Can there be multiple energy eigenstates corresponding to the same eigenvalue of a Hamiltonian (Pauli-X)?Why is the decomposition of a qubit-qutrit Hamiltonian in terms of Pauli and Gell-Mann matrices not unique?Is the Pauli group for $n$-qubits a basis for $mathbbC^2^ntimes 2^n$?Is there a simple rule for the inverse of a Clifford circuit's stabilizer table?How does the stated Pauli decomposition for $operatornameCPcdot Acdot CP$ arise?Definition of the Pauli group and the Clifford groupDecomposition of a matrix in the Pauli basis
Is it uncompelling to continue the story with lower stakes?
Why does the friction act on the inward direction when a car makes a turn on a level road?
Accurately recalling the key - can everyone do it?
Can there be multiple energy eigenstates corresponding to the same eigenvalue of a Hamiltonian (Pauli-X)?
What printing process is this?
Is there a general term for the items in a directory?
Why wasn't interlaced CRT scanning done back and forth?
Reasons for using monsters as bioweapons
Is law enforcement responsible for damages made by a search warrant?
Why does BezierFunction not follow BezierCurve at npts>4?
Does WSL2 runs Linux in a virtual machine or alongside windows Kernel?
Why do my fried eggs start browning very fast?
In MTG, was there ever a five-color deck that worked well?
Is an "are" omitted in this sentence
Is Norway in the Single Market?
Export economy of Mars
What is it exactly about flying a Flyboard across the English channel that made Zapata's thighs burn?
Went to a big 4 but got fired for underperformance in a year recently - Now every one thinks I'm pro - How to balance expectations?
Write The Shortest Program to Calculate Height of a Binary Tree
Different answers of calculations in LuaLaTeX on local computer, lua compiler and on overleaf
On the expression "sun-down"
In-Cabinet (sink base) electrical box - Metal or Plastic?
Partial Fractions: Why does this shortcut method work?
Skipping same old introductions
Can there be multiple energy eigenstates corresponding to the same eigenvalue of a Hamiltonian (Pauli-X)?
Why is the decomposition of a qubit-qutrit Hamiltonian in terms of Pauli and Gell-Mann matrices not unique?Is the Pauli group for $n$-qubits a basis for $mathbbC^2^ntimes 2^n$?Is there a simple rule for the inverse of a Clifford circuit's stabilizer table?How does the stated Pauli decomposition for $operatornameCPcdot Acdot CP$ arise?Definition of the Pauli group and the Clifford groupDecomposition of a matrix in the Pauli basis
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
all. I am a high-school student who has recently familiarized himself with linear algebra and is looking to understand quantum computing. So, I bought the classic textbook "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information" by Nielsen and Chuang.
In the book, I came across the problem: find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Pauli matrices.
I started out with the Pauli-X matrix and correctly found its eigenvalues to be 1 and -1.
When I set about finding the eigenvectors (using the standard methods of linear algebra), however, I found that for an eigenvalue of 1, any scalar multiple of (1 1) would do, and for -1, it could be any scalar multiple of (-1 1).
So suppose that a qubit has a Hamiltonian of hωX (this is an example in the book). Its energy eigenvalues are hω and -hω, and its energy eigenstates are the same as the unit eigenvectors of X.
But based on the results of my above calculation, there are two options per eigenvalue. For hω they are $frac1sqrt2(|0rangle + |1rangle)$ and $frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle -|1rangle)$, and for -hω they are $frac1sqrt2(|0rangle - |1rangle)$ and $frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle + |1rangle)$. For each case, aren't these states distinct? Are they both right? The textbook only acknowledges the first state in each case.
pauli-gates
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
all. I am a high-school student who has recently familiarized himself with linear algebra and is looking to understand quantum computing. So, I bought the classic textbook "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information" by Nielsen and Chuang.
In the book, I came across the problem: find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Pauli matrices.
I started out with the Pauli-X matrix and correctly found its eigenvalues to be 1 and -1.
When I set about finding the eigenvectors (using the standard methods of linear algebra), however, I found that for an eigenvalue of 1, any scalar multiple of (1 1) would do, and for -1, it could be any scalar multiple of (-1 1).
So suppose that a qubit has a Hamiltonian of hωX (this is an example in the book). Its energy eigenvalues are hω and -hω, and its energy eigenstates are the same as the unit eigenvectors of X.
But based on the results of my above calculation, there are two options per eigenvalue. For hω they are $frac1sqrt2(|0rangle + |1rangle)$ and $frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle -|1rangle)$, and for -hω they are $frac1sqrt2(|0rangle - |1rangle)$ and $frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle + |1rangle)$. For each case, aren't these states distinct? Are they both right? The textbook only acknowledges the first state in each case.
pauli-gates
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
all. I am a high-school student who has recently familiarized himself with linear algebra and is looking to understand quantum computing. So, I bought the classic textbook "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information" by Nielsen and Chuang.
In the book, I came across the problem: find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Pauli matrices.
I started out with the Pauli-X matrix and correctly found its eigenvalues to be 1 and -1.
When I set about finding the eigenvectors (using the standard methods of linear algebra), however, I found that for an eigenvalue of 1, any scalar multiple of (1 1) would do, and for -1, it could be any scalar multiple of (-1 1).
So suppose that a qubit has a Hamiltonian of hωX (this is an example in the book). Its energy eigenvalues are hω and -hω, and its energy eigenstates are the same as the unit eigenvectors of X.
But based on the results of my above calculation, there are two options per eigenvalue. For hω they are $frac1sqrt2(|0rangle + |1rangle)$ and $frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle -|1rangle)$, and for -hω they are $frac1sqrt2(|0rangle - |1rangle)$ and $frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle + |1rangle)$. For each case, aren't these states distinct? Are they both right? The textbook only acknowledges the first state in each case.
pauli-gates
New contributor
$endgroup$
all. I am a high-school student who has recently familiarized himself with linear algebra and is looking to understand quantum computing. So, I bought the classic textbook "Quantum Computation and Quantum Information" by Nielsen and Chuang.
In the book, I came across the problem: find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the Pauli matrices.
I started out with the Pauli-X matrix and correctly found its eigenvalues to be 1 and -1.
When I set about finding the eigenvectors (using the standard methods of linear algebra), however, I found that for an eigenvalue of 1, any scalar multiple of (1 1) would do, and for -1, it could be any scalar multiple of (-1 1).
So suppose that a qubit has a Hamiltonian of hωX (this is an example in the book). Its energy eigenvalues are hω and -hω, and its energy eigenstates are the same as the unit eigenvectors of X.
But based on the results of my above calculation, there are two options per eigenvalue. For hω they are $frac1sqrt2(|0rangle + |1rangle)$ and $frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle -|1rangle)$, and for -hω they are $frac1sqrt2(|0rangle - |1rangle)$ and $frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle + |1rangle)$. For each case, aren't these states distinct? Are they both right? The textbook only acknowledges the first state in each case.
pauli-gates
pauli-gates
New contributor
New contributor
edited 8 hours ago
Mariia Mykhailova
3,1451 gold badge3 silver badges20 bronze badges
3,1451 gold badge3 silver badges20 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
QFTUNIverseQFTUNIverse
111 bronze badge
111 bronze badge
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The quantum states that differ by a global phase (i.e., by a complex number multiple which has absolute value of 1) are considered the same quantum state, since they can not be distinguished using any operations or measurements.
Thus, the eigenstates for hω are
$|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(|0rangle + |1rangle)$,
$-|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle -|1rangle)$,
$i|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(i|0rangle + i|1rangle)$- and any other state you can obtain from $|+rangle$ by multiplying it by a complex number and normalizing it.
The convention is usually to pick coefficients so that the state has a real positive number as the first coefficient.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I hope other people on this site are as quick to respond as you!
$endgroup$
– QFTUNIverse
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For your more general question in the title, the answer is yes. This is more of a lesson in linear algebra than in quantum computing. What you found out is that actually the set of eigenvectors of a matrix $A$ corresponding to a given eigenvalue $lambda$ forms a vector subspace of the space upon which $A$ acts, this is called the eigenspace of $lambda$, $E_lambda$. As a matter of fact, if $A v_1=lambda v_1$ and $Av_2=lambda v_2$, then $A(alpha v_1+v_2)=lambda(alpha v_1+v_2)$, hence if $v_1,v_2in E_lambda$ then $alpha v_1+v_2in E_lambda$ for all $alpha in mathbbC$.
Now you might ask, are there even cases where there are two different vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$ that are in the same eigenspace? Well you found a trivial one, where the eigenspace is one dimensional, i.e.
$$ E_pm1=mathrmspanleft(frac1sqrt2(|0ranglepm|1rangle)right)$$
they're one dimensional vector spaces, as as you noticed you can multiply the vector by any constant and it stays an eigenvector, but consider the matrix
$$ A=beginpmatrix
0&1&0\1&0&0\0&0&1
endpmatrix$$
you still have the eigenvalue $1$, but now it's different as
$$v_1=beginpmatrix1\1\0
endpmatrixv_2=beginpmatrix0\0\1
endpmatrix $$
are two linearly independent eigenvectors with the same eigenvalue, meaning that in this case
$$ E_1=mathrmspan(v_1,v_2)$$
the eigenspace is two dimensional, all linear combination of these two is an eigenvector with eigenvalue one. In this case we say that the eigenvalue is degenerate, specifically twofold degenerate or with degeneracy 2.
The most extreme example if of course the identity matrix, which has only one eigenvalue, $1$, and the eigenspace is the whole vector space.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "694"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
QFTUNIverse is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6941%2fcan-there-be-multiple-energy-eigenstates-corresponding-to-the-same-eigenvalue-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The quantum states that differ by a global phase (i.e., by a complex number multiple which has absolute value of 1) are considered the same quantum state, since they can not be distinguished using any operations or measurements.
Thus, the eigenstates for hω are
$|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(|0rangle + |1rangle)$,
$-|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle -|1rangle)$,
$i|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(i|0rangle + i|1rangle)$- and any other state you can obtain from $|+rangle$ by multiplying it by a complex number and normalizing it.
The convention is usually to pick coefficients so that the state has a real positive number as the first coefficient.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I hope other people on this site are as quick to respond as you!
$endgroup$
– QFTUNIverse
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The quantum states that differ by a global phase (i.e., by a complex number multiple which has absolute value of 1) are considered the same quantum state, since they can not be distinguished using any operations or measurements.
Thus, the eigenstates for hω are
$|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(|0rangle + |1rangle)$,
$-|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle -|1rangle)$,
$i|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(i|0rangle + i|1rangle)$- and any other state you can obtain from $|+rangle$ by multiplying it by a complex number and normalizing it.
The convention is usually to pick coefficients so that the state has a real positive number as the first coefficient.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I hope other people on this site are as quick to respond as you!
$endgroup$
– QFTUNIverse
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The quantum states that differ by a global phase (i.e., by a complex number multiple which has absolute value of 1) are considered the same quantum state, since they can not be distinguished using any operations or measurements.
Thus, the eigenstates for hω are
$|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(|0rangle + |1rangle)$,
$-|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle -|1rangle)$,
$i|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(i|0rangle + i|1rangle)$- and any other state you can obtain from $|+rangle$ by multiplying it by a complex number and normalizing it.
The convention is usually to pick coefficients so that the state has a real positive number as the first coefficient.
$endgroup$
The quantum states that differ by a global phase (i.e., by a complex number multiple which has absolute value of 1) are considered the same quantum state, since they can not be distinguished using any operations or measurements.
Thus, the eigenstates for hω are
$|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(|0rangle + |1rangle)$,
$-|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(-|0rangle -|1rangle)$,
$i|+rangle = frac1sqrt2(i|0rangle + i|1rangle)$- and any other state you can obtain from $|+rangle$ by multiplying it by a complex number and normalizing it.
The convention is usually to pick coefficients so that the state has a real positive number as the first coefficient.
answered 8 hours ago
Mariia MykhailovaMariia Mykhailova
3,1451 gold badge3 silver badges20 bronze badges
3,1451 gold badge3 silver badges20 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I hope other people on this site are as quick to respond as you!
$endgroup$
– QFTUNIverse
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I hope other people on this site are as quick to respond as you!
$endgroup$
– QFTUNIverse
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I hope other people on this site are as quick to respond as you!
$endgroup$
– QFTUNIverse
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you very much. I hope other people on this site are as quick to respond as you!
$endgroup$
– QFTUNIverse
8 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For your more general question in the title, the answer is yes. This is more of a lesson in linear algebra than in quantum computing. What you found out is that actually the set of eigenvectors of a matrix $A$ corresponding to a given eigenvalue $lambda$ forms a vector subspace of the space upon which $A$ acts, this is called the eigenspace of $lambda$, $E_lambda$. As a matter of fact, if $A v_1=lambda v_1$ and $Av_2=lambda v_2$, then $A(alpha v_1+v_2)=lambda(alpha v_1+v_2)$, hence if $v_1,v_2in E_lambda$ then $alpha v_1+v_2in E_lambda$ for all $alpha in mathbbC$.
Now you might ask, are there even cases where there are two different vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$ that are in the same eigenspace? Well you found a trivial one, where the eigenspace is one dimensional, i.e.
$$ E_pm1=mathrmspanleft(frac1sqrt2(|0ranglepm|1rangle)right)$$
they're one dimensional vector spaces, as as you noticed you can multiply the vector by any constant and it stays an eigenvector, but consider the matrix
$$ A=beginpmatrix
0&1&0\1&0&0\0&0&1
endpmatrix$$
you still have the eigenvalue $1$, but now it's different as
$$v_1=beginpmatrix1\1\0
endpmatrixv_2=beginpmatrix0\0\1
endpmatrix $$
are two linearly independent eigenvectors with the same eigenvalue, meaning that in this case
$$ E_1=mathrmspan(v_1,v_2)$$
the eigenspace is two dimensional, all linear combination of these two is an eigenvector with eigenvalue one. In this case we say that the eigenvalue is degenerate, specifically twofold degenerate or with degeneracy 2.
The most extreme example if of course the identity matrix, which has only one eigenvalue, $1$, and the eigenspace is the whole vector space.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For your more general question in the title, the answer is yes. This is more of a lesson in linear algebra than in quantum computing. What you found out is that actually the set of eigenvectors of a matrix $A$ corresponding to a given eigenvalue $lambda$ forms a vector subspace of the space upon which $A$ acts, this is called the eigenspace of $lambda$, $E_lambda$. As a matter of fact, if $A v_1=lambda v_1$ and $Av_2=lambda v_2$, then $A(alpha v_1+v_2)=lambda(alpha v_1+v_2)$, hence if $v_1,v_2in E_lambda$ then $alpha v_1+v_2in E_lambda$ for all $alpha in mathbbC$.
Now you might ask, are there even cases where there are two different vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$ that are in the same eigenspace? Well you found a trivial one, where the eigenspace is one dimensional, i.e.
$$ E_pm1=mathrmspanleft(frac1sqrt2(|0ranglepm|1rangle)right)$$
they're one dimensional vector spaces, as as you noticed you can multiply the vector by any constant and it stays an eigenvector, but consider the matrix
$$ A=beginpmatrix
0&1&0\1&0&0\0&0&1
endpmatrix$$
you still have the eigenvalue $1$, but now it's different as
$$v_1=beginpmatrix1\1\0
endpmatrixv_2=beginpmatrix0\0\1
endpmatrix $$
are two linearly independent eigenvectors with the same eigenvalue, meaning that in this case
$$ E_1=mathrmspan(v_1,v_2)$$
the eigenspace is two dimensional, all linear combination of these two is an eigenvector with eigenvalue one. In this case we say that the eigenvalue is degenerate, specifically twofold degenerate or with degeneracy 2.
The most extreme example if of course the identity matrix, which has only one eigenvalue, $1$, and the eigenspace is the whole vector space.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For your more general question in the title, the answer is yes. This is more of a lesson in linear algebra than in quantum computing. What you found out is that actually the set of eigenvectors of a matrix $A$ corresponding to a given eigenvalue $lambda$ forms a vector subspace of the space upon which $A$ acts, this is called the eigenspace of $lambda$, $E_lambda$. As a matter of fact, if $A v_1=lambda v_1$ and $Av_2=lambda v_2$, then $A(alpha v_1+v_2)=lambda(alpha v_1+v_2)$, hence if $v_1,v_2in E_lambda$ then $alpha v_1+v_2in E_lambda$ for all $alpha in mathbbC$.
Now you might ask, are there even cases where there are two different vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$ that are in the same eigenspace? Well you found a trivial one, where the eigenspace is one dimensional, i.e.
$$ E_pm1=mathrmspanleft(frac1sqrt2(|0ranglepm|1rangle)right)$$
they're one dimensional vector spaces, as as you noticed you can multiply the vector by any constant and it stays an eigenvector, but consider the matrix
$$ A=beginpmatrix
0&1&0\1&0&0\0&0&1
endpmatrix$$
you still have the eigenvalue $1$, but now it's different as
$$v_1=beginpmatrix1\1\0
endpmatrixv_2=beginpmatrix0\0\1
endpmatrix $$
are two linearly independent eigenvectors with the same eigenvalue, meaning that in this case
$$ E_1=mathrmspan(v_1,v_2)$$
the eigenspace is two dimensional, all linear combination of these two is an eigenvector with eigenvalue one. In this case we say that the eigenvalue is degenerate, specifically twofold degenerate or with degeneracy 2.
The most extreme example if of course the identity matrix, which has only one eigenvalue, $1$, and the eigenspace is the whole vector space.
$endgroup$
For your more general question in the title, the answer is yes. This is more of a lesson in linear algebra than in quantum computing. What you found out is that actually the set of eigenvectors of a matrix $A$ corresponding to a given eigenvalue $lambda$ forms a vector subspace of the space upon which $A$ acts, this is called the eigenspace of $lambda$, $E_lambda$. As a matter of fact, if $A v_1=lambda v_1$ and $Av_2=lambda v_2$, then $A(alpha v_1+v_2)=lambda(alpha v_1+v_2)$, hence if $v_1,v_2in E_lambda$ then $alpha v_1+v_2in E_lambda$ for all $alpha in mathbbC$.
Now you might ask, are there even cases where there are two different vectors $v_1$ and $v_2$ that are in the same eigenspace? Well you found a trivial one, where the eigenspace is one dimensional, i.e.
$$ E_pm1=mathrmspanleft(frac1sqrt2(|0ranglepm|1rangle)right)$$
they're one dimensional vector spaces, as as you noticed you can multiply the vector by any constant and it stays an eigenvector, but consider the matrix
$$ A=beginpmatrix
0&1&0\1&0&0\0&0&1
endpmatrix$$
you still have the eigenvalue $1$, but now it's different as
$$v_1=beginpmatrix1\1\0
endpmatrixv_2=beginpmatrix0\0\1
endpmatrix $$
are two linearly independent eigenvectors with the same eigenvalue, meaning that in this case
$$ E_1=mathrmspan(v_1,v_2)$$
the eigenspace is two dimensional, all linear combination of these two is an eigenvector with eigenvalue one. In this case we say that the eigenvalue is degenerate, specifically twofold degenerate or with degeneracy 2.
The most extreme example if of course the identity matrix, which has only one eigenvalue, $1$, and the eigenspace is the whole vector space.
answered 4 hours ago
user2723984user2723984
4109 bronze badges
4109 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
QFTUNIverse is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
QFTUNIverse is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
QFTUNIverse is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
QFTUNIverse is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6941%2fcan-there-be-multiple-energy-eigenstates-corresponding-to-the-same-eigenvalue-of%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown