Number of Fingers for a Math Oriented RaceWhat environment would support an electric alien species?Could fairies be a hominid subfamily?Ideas for how aliens would approach this fight?Could a solar system with large amounts of dust and debris exist?What mix of corporate structures (out of the 4 given) would be most efficient for a galaxy-wide corporate conglomerate?How would aircraft and air-life develop on High-G, Lower-Atmosphere planet?A mechanism for a level interstellar playing fieldCan someone help me with ocean currents? I'm really confused

Is a Centaur PC considered an animal when calculating carrying capacity for vehicles?

Can someone identify this unusual plane at airport?

Many many thanks

Toroidal Heyacrazy: Rainstorm

"Petrol aggregate"?

Find most "academic" implementation of doubly linked list

How to emphasise the insignificance of someone/thing – besides using "klein"

Is there an in-universe explanation given to the senior Imperial Navy Officers as to why Darth Vader serves Emperor Palpatine?

Why does this London Underground poster from 1924 have a Star of David atop a Christmas tree?

How do we improve collaboration with problematic tester team?

To what extent should we fear giving offense?

助けてくれて有難う meaning and usage

Was a star-crossed lover

Does NASA use any type of office/groupware software and which is that?

Can an object tethered to a spaceship be pulled out of event horizon?

74S vs 74LS ICs

Why did the population of Bhutan drop by 70% between 2007 and 2008?

Commercial company wants me to list all prior "inventions", give up everything not listed

Talk interpreter

Did anybody find out it was Anakin who blew up the command center?

Is the Amazon rainforest the "world's lungs"?

Grep contents before a colon

Can I use coax outlets for cable modem?

Dotted background on a flowchart



Number of Fingers for a Math Oriented Race


What environment would support an electric alien species?Could fairies be a hominid subfamily?Ideas for how aliens would approach this fight?Could a solar system with large amounts of dust and debris exist?What mix of corporate structures (out of the 4 given) would be most efficient for a galaxy-wide corporate conglomerate?How would aircraft and air-life develop on High-G, Lower-Atmosphere planet?A mechanism for a level interstellar playing fieldCan someone help me with ocean currents? I'm really confused






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


Form follows function, or that's how the saying goes. Which isn't true for some things. That is to say, a large reason why humans use a base 10 numbering system is because we have 10 fingers, not that we have 10 fingers because we use a base 10 numbering system. Except as worldbuilders, we get to do the reverse and create an alien race with the precise number of fingers that would be the most useful.



In my sci-fi setting, I'd like the most advanced race to have an extra advantage - a superior numbering system, using base 16 instead of base 10. 16 is a perfect square, almost a perfect number, and uses squares of 2 as it's landmarks of higher numbers (it's 'ten's place' is 256, it's 'hundred's place' is 4096, etc.). It handles larger numbers far better than a Base 4 system would, and easily converts to binary.



So now comes the real question - how do I design the aliens such that a base 16 system is organically produced? After all, number systems aren't designed in the modern. Eight fingers on one hand is too much for my tastes, and a four-armed, four-fingered alien on two feet doesn't seem like it would naturally arise. And, considering this the 'smart' race, I'd rather not have a solution that comes up as a result of combat with each other, something which the four-armed variation definitely suggests.



Two points - one: Yes, I know there are ancient 16-bit numbering systems that have survived to the modern era. However, they don't see widespread use today. I'm looking for a way so that I don't have to handwave and say they just developed a system like that and took over. Second - an answer which proposes a different base system will be accepted, so long as you can definitively prove it superior to my base 16 for the purposes of a sci-fi setting.



EDIT: Reminder, I'm not asking which Base numbering system is superior. As far as I'm concerned, they've all got strengths and weakness, and 16 is what I find easiest for my setting. The question is a xenobiology question about alien design and development.



EDIT II: The most common numeral system used currently, and historically, is the Hindu-Arabic numeral system, as it is so called. It is Base 10, and spread throughout the world to become the backbone of math, which has only recently begun to commonly use other bases because of programming.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    There is no “definitively better base”. The base is a trade-off. In positional numbering systems — which itself is a relatively recent piece of technology — a higher base can be written more compactly but requires memorizing a larger set of axioms (the times table for hexadecimal is 2.5x as large as the one for decimal). Prime basis have advantages, but composite bases give you more “round numbers”, witness the ubiquity of 360 — divisible by 0-12 easily, ie base 12).
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Bron
    8 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "That is to say, a large reason why humans use a base 10 numbering system is because we have 10 fingers" Citation needed. Sumerians used base 60 and had very advanced mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Trevor 60 was because 60 = (1*2*3) * (10). The 10 is still in there, the other term (6) was included because it embeds two additional small primes, making division easier. See my comments above about base 12. Same idea for base 20, which some cultures use. The base 10 part unequivocally comes from bilateral symmetry (2) with 5 fingers on each hand.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Bron
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    (1) Humans in general do not use base 10. There are languages which use other bases of numeration. (2) We don't know for certain whether there is a causal link between our ten fingers and the widespread use of base 10 representation of numbers. (3) Very many humans can think and compute mentally in base 16. They are called programmers. Older programmers can also do it in base 8. (4) Base 16 is in no way, shape or form "better" for humans than base 10. (5) Computers actually use base 2, not base 16. (6) "16-bit ancient numbering systems": citation definitely needed.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    7 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "The Hindu-Arabic numeral system [...] is Base 10, and the backbone of math": with all due respect, you have no idea what you are talking about. The decimal representation of numbers is not the backbone of mathematics; it is in fact an utterly unimportant detail.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    5 hours ago

















2












$begingroup$


Form follows function, or that's how the saying goes. Which isn't true for some things. That is to say, a large reason why humans use a base 10 numbering system is because we have 10 fingers, not that we have 10 fingers because we use a base 10 numbering system. Except as worldbuilders, we get to do the reverse and create an alien race with the precise number of fingers that would be the most useful.



In my sci-fi setting, I'd like the most advanced race to have an extra advantage - a superior numbering system, using base 16 instead of base 10. 16 is a perfect square, almost a perfect number, and uses squares of 2 as it's landmarks of higher numbers (it's 'ten's place' is 256, it's 'hundred's place' is 4096, etc.). It handles larger numbers far better than a Base 4 system would, and easily converts to binary.



So now comes the real question - how do I design the aliens such that a base 16 system is organically produced? After all, number systems aren't designed in the modern. Eight fingers on one hand is too much for my tastes, and a four-armed, four-fingered alien on two feet doesn't seem like it would naturally arise. And, considering this the 'smart' race, I'd rather not have a solution that comes up as a result of combat with each other, something which the four-armed variation definitely suggests.



Two points - one: Yes, I know there are ancient 16-bit numbering systems that have survived to the modern era. However, they don't see widespread use today. I'm looking for a way so that I don't have to handwave and say they just developed a system like that and took over. Second - an answer which proposes a different base system will be accepted, so long as you can definitively prove it superior to my base 16 for the purposes of a sci-fi setting.



EDIT: Reminder, I'm not asking which Base numbering system is superior. As far as I'm concerned, they've all got strengths and weakness, and 16 is what I find easiest for my setting. The question is a xenobiology question about alien design and development.



EDIT II: The most common numeral system used currently, and historically, is the Hindu-Arabic numeral system, as it is so called. It is Base 10, and spread throughout the world to become the backbone of math, which has only recently begun to commonly use other bases because of programming.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    There is no “definitively better base”. The base is a trade-off. In positional numbering systems — which itself is a relatively recent piece of technology — a higher base can be written more compactly but requires memorizing a larger set of axioms (the times table for hexadecimal is 2.5x as large as the one for decimal). Prime basis have advantages, but composite bases give you more “round numbers”, witness the ubiquity of 360 — divisible by 0-12 easily, ie base 12).
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Bron
    8 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "That is to say, a large reason why humans use a base 10 numbering system is because we have 10 fingers" Citation needed. Sumerians used base 60 and had very advanced mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Trevor 60 was because 60 = (1*2*3) * (10). The 10 is still in there, the other term (6) was included because it embeds two additional small primes, making division easier. See my comments above about base 12. Same idea for base 20, which some cultures use. The base 10 part unequivocally comes from bilateral symmetry (2) with 5 fingers on each hand.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Bron
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    (1) Humans in general do not use base 10. There are languages which use other bases of numeration. (2) We don't know for certain whether there is a causal link between our ten fingers and the widespread use of base 10 representation of numbers. (3) Very many humans can think and compute mentally in base 16. They are called programmers. Older programmers can also do it in base 8. (4) Base 16 is in no way, shape or form "better" for humans than base 10. (5) Computers actually use base 2, not base 16. (6) "16-bit ancient numbering systems": citation definitely needed.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    7 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "The Hindu-Arabic numeral system [...] is Base 10, and the backbone of math": with all due respect, you have no idea what you are talking about. The decimal representation of numbers is not the backbone of mathematics; it is in fact an utterly unimportant detail.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    5 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


Form follows function, or that's how the saying goes. Which isn't true for some things. That is to say, a large reason why humans use a base 10 numbering system is because we have 10 fingers, not that we have 10 fingers because we use a base 10 numbering system. Except as worldbuilders, we get to do the reverse and create an alien race with the precise number of fingers that would be the most useful.



In my sci-fi setting, I'd like the most advanced race to have an extra advantage - a superior numbering system, using base 16 instead of base 10. 16 is a perfect square, almost a perfect number, and uses squares of 2 as it's landmarks of higher numbers (it's 'ten's place' is 256, it's 'hundred's place' is 4096, etc.). It handles larger numbers far better than a Base 4 system would, and easily converts to binary.



So now comes the real question - how do I design the aliens such that a base 16 system is organically produced? After all, number systems aren't designed in the modern. Eight fingers on one hand is too much for my tastes, and a four-armed, four-fingered alien on two feet doesn't seem like it would naturally arise. And, considering this the 'smart' race, I'd rather not have a solution that comes up as a result of combat with each other, something which the four-armed variation definitely suggests.



Two points - one: Yes, I know there are ancient 16-bit numbering systems that have survived to the modern era. However, they don't see widespread use today. I'm looking for a way so that I don't have to handwave and say they just developed a system like that and took over. Second - an answer which proposes a different base system will be accepted, so long as you can definitively prove it superior to my base 16 for the purposes of a sci-fi setting.



EDIT: Reminder, I'm not asking which Base numbering system is superior. As far as I'm concerned, they've all got strengths and weakness, and 16 is what I find easiest for my setting. The question is a xenobiology question about alien design and development.



EDIT II: The most common numeral system used currently, and historically, is the Hindu-Arabic numeral system, as it is so called. It is Base 10, and spread throughout the world to become the backbone of math, which has only recently begun to commonly use other bases because of programming.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Form follows function, or that's how the saying goes. Which isn't true for some things. That is to say, a large reason why humans use a base 10 numbering system is because we have 10 fingers, not that we have 10 fingers because we use a base 10 numbering system. Except as worldbuilders, we get to do the reverse and create an alien race with the precise number of fingers that would be the most useful.



In my sci-fi setting, I'd like the most advanced race to have an extra advantage - a superior numbering system, using base 16 instead of base 10. 16 is a perfect square, almost a perfect number, and uses squares of 2 as it's landmarks of higher numbers (it's 'ten's place' is 256, it's 'hundred's place' is 4096, etc.). It handles larger numbers far better than a Base 4 system would, and easily converts to binary.



So now comes the real question - how do I design the aliens such that a base 16 system is organically produced? After all, number systems aren't designed in the modern. Eight fingers on one hand is too much for my tastes, and a four-armed, four-fingered alien on two feet doesn't seem like it would naturally arise. And, considering this the 'smart' race, I'd rather not have a solution that comes up as a result of combat with each other, something which the four-armed variation definitely suggests.



Two points - one: Yes, I know there are ancient 16-bit numbering systems that have survived to the modern era. However, they don't see widespread use today. I'm looking for a way so that I don't have to handwave and say they just developed a system like that and took over. Second - an answer which proposes a different base system will be accepted, so long as you can definitively prove it superior to my base 16 for the purposes of a sci-fi setting.



EDIT: Reminder, I'm not asking which Base numbering system is superior. As far as I'm concerned, they've all got strengths and weakness, and 16 is what I find easiest for my setting. The question is a xenobiology question about alien design and development.



EDIT II: The most common numeral system used currently, and historically, is the Hindu-Arabic numeral system, as it is so called. It is Base 10, and spread throughout the world to become the backbone of math, which has only recently begun to commonly use other bases because of programming.







science-fiction xenobiology numeral






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago







Halfthawed

















asked 8 hours ago









HalfthawedHalfthawed

5,5964 silver badges28 bronze badges




5,5964 silver badges28 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    There is no “definitively better base”. The base is a trade-off. In positional numbering systems — which itself is a relatively recent piece of technology — a higher base can be written more compactly but requires memorizing a larger set of axioms (the times table for hexadecimal is 2.5x as large as the one for decimal). Prime basis have advantages, but composite bases give you more “round numbers”, witness the ubiquity of 360 — divisible by 0-12 easily, ie base 12).
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Bron
    8 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "That is to say, a large reason why humans use a base 10 numbering system is because we have 10 fingers" Citation needed. Sumerians used base 60 and had very advanced mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Trevor 60 was because 60 = (1*2*3) * (10). The 10 is still in there, the other term (6) was included because it embeds two additional small primes, making division easier. See my comments above about base 12. Same idea for base 20, which some cultures use. The base 10 part unequivocally comes from bilateral symmetry (2) with 5 fingers on each hand.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Bron
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    (1) Humans in general do not use base 10. There are languages which use other bases of numeration. (2) We don't know for certain whether there is a causal link between our ten fingers and the widespread use of base 10 representation of numbers. (3) Very many humans can think and compute mentally in base 16. They are called programmers. Older programmers can also do it in base 8. (4) Base 16 is in no way, shape or form "better" for humans than base 10. (5) Computers actually use base 2, not base 16. (6) "16-bit ancient numbering systems": citation definitely needed.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    7 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "The Hindu-Arabic numeral system [...] is Base 10, and the backbone of math": with all due respect, you have no idea what you are talking about. The decimal representation of numbers is not the backbone of mathematics; it is in fact an utterly unimportant detail.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    5 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    There is no “definitively better base”. The base is a trade-off. In positional numbering systems — which itself is a relatively recent piece of technology — a higher base can be written more compactly but requires memorizing a larger set of axioms (the times table for hexadecimal is 2.5x as large as the one for decimal). Prime basis have advantages, but composite bases give you more “round numbers”, witness the ubiquity of 360 — divisible by 0-12 easily, ie base 12).
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Bron
    8 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    "That is to say, a large reason why humans use a base 10 numbering system is because we have 10 fingers" Citation needed. Sumerians used base 60 and had very advanced mathematics.
    $endgroup$
    – Trevor
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Trevor 60 was because 60 = (1*2*3) * (10). The 10 is still in there, the other term (6) was included because it embeds two additional small primes, making division easier. See my comments above about base 12. Same idea for base 20, which some cultures use. The base 10 part unequivocally comes from bilateral symmetry (2) with 5 fingers on each hand.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan Bron
    7 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    (1) Humans in general do not use base 10. There are languages which use other bases of numeration. (2) We don't know for certain whether there is a causal link between our ten fingers and the widespread use of base 10 representation of numbers. (3) Very many humans can think and compute mentally in base 16. They are called programmers. Older programmers can also do it in base 8. (4) Base 16 is in no way, shape or form "better" for humans than base 10. (5) Computers actually use base 2, not base 16. (6) "16-bit ancient numbering systems": citation definitely needed.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    7 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    "The Hindu-Arabic numeral system [...] is Base 10, and the backbone of math": with all due respect, you have no idea what you are talking about. The decimal representation of numbers is not the backbone of mathematics; it is in fact an utterly unimportant detail.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    5 hours ago















$begingroup$
There is no “definitively better base”. The base is a trade-off. In positional numbering systems — which itself is a relatively recent piece of technology — a higher base can be written more compactly but requires memorizing a larger set of axioms (the times table for hexadecimal is 2.5x as large as the one for decimal). Prime basis have advantages, but composite bases give you more “round numbers”, witness the ubiquity of 360 — divisible by 0-12 easily, ie base 12).
$endgroup$
– Dan Bron
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
There is no “definitively better base”. The base is a trade-off. In positional numbering systems — which itself is a relatively recent piece of technology — a higher base can be written more compactly but requires memorizing a larger set of axioms (the times table for hexadecimal is 2.5x as large as the one for decimal). Prime basis have advantages, but composite bases give you more “round numbers”, witness the ubiquity of 360 — divisible by 0-12 easily, ie base 12).
$endgroup$
– Dan Bron
8 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
"That is to say, a large reason why humans use a base 10 numbering system is because we have 10 fingers" Citation needed. Sumerians used base 60 and had very advanced mathematics.
$endgroup$
– Trevor
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
"That is to say, a large reason why humans use a base 10 numbering system is because we have 10 fingers" Citation needed. Sumerians used base 60 and had very advanced mathematics.
$endgroup$
– Trevor
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Trevor 60 was because 60 = (1*2*3) * (10). The 10 is still in there, the other term (6) was included because it embeds two additional small primes, making division easier. See my comments above about base 12. Same idea for base 20, which some cultures use. The base 10 part unequivocally comes from bilateral symmetry (2) with 5 fingers on each hand.
$endgroup$
– Dan Bron
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Trevor 60 was because 60 = (1*2*3) * (10). The 10 is still in there, the other term (6) was included because it embeds two additional small primes, making division easier. See my comments above about base 12. Same idea for base 20, which some cultures use. The base 10 part unequivocally comes from bilateral symmetry (2) with 5 fingers on each hand.
$endgroup$
– Dan Bron
7 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
(1) Humans in general do not use base 10. There are languages which use other bases of numeration. (2) We don't know for certain whether there is a causal link between our ten fingers and the widespread use of base 10 representation of numbers. (3) Very many humans can think and compute mentally in base 16. They are called programmers. Older programmers can also do it in base 8. (4) Base 16 is in no way, shape or form "better" for humans than base 10. (5) Computers actually use base 2, not base 16. (6) "16-bit ancient numbering systems": citation definitely needed.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
(1) Humans in general do not use base 10. There are languages which use other bases of numeration. (2) We don't know for certain whether there is a causal link between our ten fingers and the widespread use of base 10 representation of numbers. (3) Very many humans can think and compute mentally in base 16. They are called programmers. Older programmers can also do it in base 8. (4) Base 16 is in no way, shape or form "better" for humans than base 10. (5) Computers actually use base 2, not base 16. (6) "16-bit ancient numbering systems": citation definitely needed.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago





2




2




$begingroup$
"The Hindu-Arabic numeral system [...] is Base 10, and the backbone of math": with all due respect, you have no idea what you are talking about. The decimal representation of numbers is not the backbone of mathematics; it is in fact an utterly unimportant detail.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
"The Hindu-Arabic numeral system [...] is Base 10, and the backbone of math": with all due respect, you have no idea what you are talking about. The decimal representation of numbers is not the backbone of mathematics; it is in fact an utterly unimportant detail.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
5 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















6













$begingroup$

The same way humans can do base 12 on our hands, use the bones of the fingers, excluding thumbs (or using thumbs to keep track of sets completed).



So, take human physiology and either add a joint to each finger (16 bones on each hand) or remove a joint (8 bones on each hand, for 16 total).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$






















    3













    $begingroup$

    Just go with those four-fingered-hand aliens.
    Let me remind you, despite having 10 fingers, for quite some time, base 12 was very popular parallel system and there were even attempts to discard base 10 in favour of base 12. It still survived alongside base 60 in time measurement, and word "dozen" is used till this day.
    It doesn't need to develop very organically, and 8 fingers is already good enough start. Just assume that originally, they used base 8, but they also used base 16 for certain things like dividing their day into hours, etc.



    However, base 16 and base 8 aren't as good as you'd expect. They're indeed good now in days of computing, but base 12 and base 10 had two big advantages over offshoots of binary - division. Base 12 allows simpler division for 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and base 10, while worse, still allows 2, 4, 5, 8, 10.



    It's more likely that such a species would go for base 12, to eventually replace it in some areas by base 16 for math and science, but base 12 would likely stick around as something normal people wouldn't easily leave behind.



    A reminder of how people can get stuck in their ways is how, we could easily divide day into 20 'hours' of 100 'minutes' each, redefining meaning of hour and minute, but we don't do it.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor



    Failus Maximus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      You can argue that 12 is not a good candidate for a base, as it needlessly includes the factor 2 twice. I'd expect either a use of base 6 (simpler, more efficient) or 30 (include 2, 3, and 5 as factors).
      $endgroup$
      – cmaster
      51 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you. To understand why 12 is a good candidate, you need to understand where was base 12 used. Base twelve used dozens and grosses(144), and was used by people who mostly operated with these numbers. For example, they brought six dozen and five eggs. Or a merchant might have four grosses three dozens and two pieces of currency. Base 12, unlike base 6, is large enough to cover most numbers people used with units, dozens and grosses. Meanwhile to achieve similar coverage, you'd require 1, 6, 36, and 216. 30 is impractical - too many numbers.
      $endgroup$
      – Failus Maximus
      21 mins ago


















    3













    $begingroup$

    Give them prehensile feet



    4 fingers on each of two hands.

    4 toes on each of two feet.



    The feet don't even have to be fully prehensile. Just usable enough that they'd think to count them. After their civilization creates their math system, their culture can also move to one that wears shoes and so forth. The feet don't have to be highly visible today.



    Make it a cooperative culture



    If the math system comes from two people working together, then two pairs of hands—each with 4 fingers—gives you your perfect 16.



    Count other body parts



    When my daughter was learning math, I encouraged her to count on her body to get the process started. For numbers higher than 10, we sometimes used my fingers, sometimes her toes, and other times her face.



    8 fingers + 2 ears + 2 eyes + 2 lips + 2 nostrils = 16



    Or use any other body parts you desire, including ones that might be particular to this species.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$






















      1













      $begingroup$

      Why not a primate like species with three fingers and an opposable thumb on each hand for a total of 16 digits. Primates are largely adapted to use both hands and feet for grasping with Hominids (those silly creatures we call humans) being an exception (they have less dexterous feet than most primates, as an adaptation for bipedial locomotion necessitated some design changes. Still, it's not unheard of for a human to be quite adapt at dexterous manipulation of tools with their feet and some practice. I once met a man with no arms, who played a mean guitar and had a specially adapted steering device he used to drive a car).



      The counting system of base 16 would evolve from using all four limbs in counting, since their society would likely have equally used all limbs for movement.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$






















        0













        $begingroup$

        The base in which numbers are represented doesn't change, ease, or inform mathematics. All it changes is arithmetic.



        The number of digits, arms, feet, eyes, knuckles, gill slits, or kinks in their prehensile tails won't change the brilliance, insight, and utility of the math your species develops.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$






















          0













          $begingroup$

          Your aliens are smart. So they use the four fingers they have on one hand to represent all their 16 digits by using a different combination for each:



          • 0 = closed fist

          • 1 = only thumb stretched out

          • 2 = only index finger stretched out

          • 3 = index + thumb

          • 4 = only ring finger (there is no middle finger!)

          • 5 = ring + thumb

          • 6 = ring + index

          • 7 = ring + index + thumb

          • 8 = only pinky

          • 9 = pinky + ...

          With their two hands, they can either remember two different digits at the same time, or put them together to form a 2-digit number. This allows them to count up to 255 with their fingers.



          Your aliens actually envy the humans for our fifth finger, realizing that humans are able to count up to 1023 on their fingers alone... if only they would recognize the full power of their ten fingers!



          (Full disclosure: Even humans can learn to use their fingers efficiently, counting mindlessly from zero to 31 on a single hand, and I'm proof of that. I only need to make sure that I don't inadvertendly show someone a 4... 1 is ok, 6 is ok, 18 is reserved for concerts...)






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$

















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "579"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153914%2fnumber-of-fingers-for-a-math-oriented-race%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes








            6 Answers
            6






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            6













            $begingroup$

            The same way humans can do base 12 on our hands, use the bones of the fingers, excluding thumbs (or using thumbs to keep track of sets completed).



            So, take human physiology and either add a joint to each finger (16 bones on each hand) or remove a joint (8 bones on each hand, for 16 total).






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



















              6













              $begingroup$

              The same way humans can do base 12 on our hands, use the bones of the fingers, excluding thumbs (or using thumbs to keep track of sets completed).



              So, take human physiology and either add a joint to each finger (16 bones on each hand) or remove a joint (8 bones on each hand, for 16 total).






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                6














                6










                6







                $begingroup$

                The same way humans can do base 12 on our hands, use the bones of the fingers, excluding thumbs (or using thumbs to keep track of sets completed).



                So, take human physiology and either add a joint to each finger (16 bones on each hand) or remove a joint (8 bones on each hand, for 16 total).






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                The same way humans can do base 12 on our hands, use the bones of the fingers, excluding thumbs (or using thumbs to keep track of sets completed).



                So, take human physiology and either add a joint to each finger (16 bones on each hand) or remove a joint (8 bones on each hand, for 16 total).







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 6 hours ago

























                answered 6 hours ago









                HaihamiHaihami

                712 bronze badges




                712 bronze badges


























                    3













                    $begingroup$

                    Just go with those four-fingered-hand aliens.
                    Let me remind you, despite having 10 fingers, for quite some time, base 12 was very popular parallel system and there were even attempts to discard base 10 in favour of base 12. It still survived alongside base 60 in time measurement, and word "dozen" is used till this day.
                    It doesn't need to develop very organically, and 8 fingers is already good enough start. Just assume that originally, they used base 8, but they also used base 16 for certain things like dividing their day into hours, etc.



                    However, base 16 and base 8 aren't as good as you'd expect. They're indeed good now in days of computing, but base 12 and base 10 had two big advantages over offshoots of binary - division. Base 12 allows simpler division for 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and base 10, while worse, still allows 2, 4, 5, 8, 10.



                    It's more likely that such a species would go for base 12, to eventually replace it in some areas by base 16 for math and science, but base 12 would likely stick around as something normal people wouldn't easily leave behind.



                    A reminder of how people can get stuck in their ways is how, we could easily divide day into 20 'hours' of 100 'minutes' each, redefining meaning of hour and minute, but we don't do it.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor



                    Failus Maximus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    $endgroup$














                    • $begingroup$
                      You can argue that 12 is not a good candidate for a base, as it needlessly includes the factor 2 twice. I'd expect either a use of base 6 (simpler, more efficient) or 30 (include 2, 3, and 5 as factors).
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmaster
                      51 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you. To understand why 12 is a good candidate, you need to understand where was base 12 used. Base twelve used dozens and grosses(144), and was used by people who mostly operated with these numbers. For example, they brought six dozen and five eggs. Or a merchant might have four grosses three dozens and two pieces of currency. Base 12, unlike base 6, is large enough to cover most numbers people used with units, dozens and grosses. Meanwhile to achieve similar coverage, you'd require 1, 6, 36, and 216. 30 is impractical - too many numbers.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Failus Maximus
                      21 mins ago















                    3













                    $begingroup$

                    Just go with those four-fingered-hand aliens.
                    Let me remind you, despite having 10 fingers, for quite some time, base 12 was very popular parallel system and there were even attempts to discard base 10 in favour of base 12. It still survived alongside base 60 in time measurement, and word "dozen" is used till this day.
                    It doesn't need to develop very organically, and 8 fingers is already good enough start. Just assume that originally, they used base 8, but they also used base 16 for certain things like dividing their day into hours, etc.



                    However, base 16 and base 8 aren't as good as you'd expect. They're indeed good now in days of computing, but base 12 and base 10 had two big advantages over offshoots of binary - division. Base 12 allows simpler division for 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and base 10, while worse, still allows 2, 4, 5, 8, 10.



                    It's more likely that such a species would go for base 12, to eventually replace it in some areas by base 16 for math and science, but base 12 would likely stick around as something normal people wouldn't easily leave behind.



                    A reminder of how people can get stuck in their ways is how, we could easily divide day into 20 'hours' of 100 'minutes' each, redefining meaning of hour and minute, but we don't do it.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor



                    Failus Maximus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    $endgroup$














                    • $begingroup$
                      You can argue that 12 is not a good candidate for a base, as it needlessly includes the factor 2 twice. I'd expect either a use of base 6 (simpler, more efficient) or 30 (include 2, 3, and 5 as factors).
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmaster
                      51 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you. To understand why 12 is a good candidate, you need to understand where was base 12 used. Base twelve used dozens and grosses(144), and was used by people who mostly operated with these numbers. For example, they brought six dozen and five eggs. Or a merchant might have four grosses three dozens and two pieces of currency. Base 12, unlike base 6, is large enough to cover most numbers people used with units, dozens and grosses. Meanwhile to achieve similar coverage, you'd require 1, 6, 36, and 216. 30 is impractical - too many numbers.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Failus Maximus
                      21 mins ago













                    3














                    3










                    3







                    $begingroup$

                    Just go with those four-fingered-hand aliens.
                    Let me remind you, despite having 10 fingers, for quite some time, base 12 was very popular parallel system and there were even attempts to discard base 10 in favour of base 12. It still survived alongside base 60 in time measurement, and word "dozen" is used till this day.
                    It doesn't need to develop very organically, and 8 fingers is already good enough start. Just assume that originally, they used base 8, but they also used base 16 for certain things like dividing their day into hours, etc.



                    However, base 16 and base 8 aren't as good as you'd expect. They're indeed good now in days of computing, but base 12 and base 10 had two big advantages over offshoots of binary - division. Base 12 allows simpler division for 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and base 10, while worse, still allows 2, 4, 5, 8, 10.



                    It's more likely that such a species would go for base 12, to eventually replace it in some areas by base 16 for math and science, but base 12 would likely stick around as something normal people wouldn't easily leave behind.



                    A reminder of how people can get stuck in their ways is how, we could easily divide day into 20 'hours' of 100 'minutes' each, redefining meaning of hour and minute, but we don't do it.






                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor



                    Failus Maximus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    $endgroup$



                    Just go with those four-fingered-hand aliens.
                    Let me remind you, despite having 10 fingers, for quite some time, base 12 was very popular parallel system and there were even attempts to discard base 10 in favour of base 12. It still survived alongside base 60 in time measurement, and word "dozen" is used till this day.
                    It doesn't need to develop very organically, and 8 fingers is already good enough start. Just assume that originally, they used base 8, but they also used base 16 for certain things like dividing their day into hours, etc.



                    However, base 16 and base 8 aren't as good as you'd expect. They're indeed good now in days of computing, but base 12 and base 10 had two big advantages over offshoots of binary - division. Base 12 allows simpler division for 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9 and base 10, while worse, still allows 2, 4, 5, 8, 10.



                    It's more likely that such a species would go for base 12, to eventually replace it in some areas by base 16 for math and science, but base 12 would likely stick around as something normal people wouldn't easily leave behind.



                    A reminder of how people can get stuck in their ways is how, we could easily divide day into 20 'hours' of 100 'minutes' each, redefining meaning of hour and minute, but we don't do it.







                    share|improve this answer








                    New contributor



                    Failus Maximus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer






                    New contributor



                    Failus Maximus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.








                    answered 7 hours ago









                    Failus MaximusFailus Maximus

                    1348 bronze badges




                    1348 bronze badges




                    New contributor



                    Failus Maximus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.




                    New contributor




                    Failus Maximus is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    • $begingroup$
                      You can argue that 12 is not a good candidate for a base, as it needlessly includes the factor 2 twice. I'd expect either a use of base 6 (simpler, more efficient) or 30 (include 2, 3, and 5 as factors).
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmaster
                      51 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you. To understand why 12 is a good candidate, you need to understand where was base 12 used. Base twelve used dozens and grosses(144), and was used by people who mostly operated with these numbers. For example, they brought six dozen and five eggs. Or a merchant might have four grosses three dozens and two pieces of currency. Base 12, unlike base 6, is large enough to cover most numbers people used with units, dozens and grosses. Meanwhile to achieve similar coverage, you'd require 1, 6, 36, and 216. 30 is impractical - too many numbers.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Failus Maximus
                      21 mins ago
















                    • $begingroup$
                      You can argue that 12 is not a good candidate for a base, as it needlessly includes the factor 2 twice. I'd expect either a use of base 6 (simpler, more efficient) or 30 (include 2, 3, and 5 as factors).
                      $endgroup$
                      – cmaster
                      51 mins ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you. To understand why 12 is a good candidate, you need to understand where was base 12 used. Base twelve used dozens and grosses(144), and was used by people who mostly operated with these numbers. For example, they brought six dozen and five eggs. Or a merchant might have four grosses three dozens and two pieces of currency. Base 12, unlike base 6, is large enough to cover most numbers people used with units, dozens and grosses. Meanwhile to achieve similar coverage, you'd require 1, 6, 36, and 216. 30 is impractical - too many numbers.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Failus Maximus
                      21 mins ago















                    $begingroup$
                    You can argue that 12 is not a good candidate for a base, as it needlessly includes the factor 2 twice. I'd expect either a use of base 6 (simpler, more efficient) or 30 (include 2, 3, and 5 as factors).
                    $endgroup$
                    – cmaster
                    51 mins ago




                    $begingroup$
                    You can argue that 12 is not a good candidate for a base, as it needlessly includes the factor 2 twice. I'd expect either a use of base 6 (simpler, more efficient) or 30 (include 2, 3, and 5 as factors).
                    $endgroup$
                    – cmaster
                    51 mins ago












                    $begingroup$
                    I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you. To understand why 12 is a good candidate, you need to understand where was base 12 used. Base twelve used dozens and grosses(144), and was used by people who mostly operated with these numbers. For example, they brought six dozen and five eggs. Or a merchant might have four grosses three dozens and two pieces of currency. Base 12, unlike base 6, is large enough to cover most numbers people used with units, dozens and grosses. Meanwhile to achieve similar coverage, you'd require 1, 6, 36, and 216. 30 is impractical - too many numbers.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Failus Maximus
                    21 mins ago




                    $begingroup$
                    I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you. To understand why 12 is a good candidate, you need to understand where was base 12 used. Base twelve used dozens and grosses(144), and was used by people who mostly operated with these numbers. For example, they brought six dozen and five eggs. Or a merchant might have four grosses three dozens and two pieces of currency. Base 12, unlike base 6, is large enough to cover most numbers people used with units, dozens and grosses. Meanwhile to achieve similar coverage, you'd require 1, 6, 36, and 216. 30 is impractical - too many numbers.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Failus Maximus
                    21 mins ago











                    3













                    $begingroup$

                    Give them prehensile feet



                    4 fingers on each of two hands.

                    4 toes on each of two feet.



                    The feet don't even have to be fully prehensile. Just usable enough that they'd think to count them. After their civilization creates their math system, their culture can also move to one that wears shoes and so forth. The feet don't have to be highly visible today.



                    Make it a cooperative culture



                    If the math system comes from two people working together, then two pairs of hands—each with 4 fingers—gives you your perfect 16.



                    Count other body parts



                    When my daughter was learning math, I encouraged her to count on her body to get the process started. For numbers higher than 10, we sometimes used my fingers, sometimes her toes, and other times her face.



                    8 fingers + 2 ears + 2 eyes + 2 lips + 2 nostrils = 16



                    Or use any other body parts you desire, including ones that might be particular to this species.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



















                      3













                      $begingroup$

                      Give them prehensile feet



                      4 fingers on each of two hands.

                      4 toes on each of two feet.



                      The feet don't even have to be fully prehensile. Just usable enough that they'd think to count them. After their civilization creates their math system, their culture can also move to one that wears shoes and so forth. The feet don't have to be highly visible today.



                      Make it a cooperative culture



                      If the math system comes from two people working together, then two pairs of hands—each with 4 fingers—gives you your perfect 16.



                      Count other body parts



                      When my daughter was learning math, I encouraged her to count on her body to get the process started. For numbers higher than 10, we sometimes used my fingers, sometimes her toes, and other times her face.



                      8 fingers + 2 ears + 2 eyes + 2 lips + 2 nostrils = 16



                      Or use any other body parts you desire, including ones that might be particular to this species.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        3














                        3










                        3







                        $begingroup$

                        Give them prehensile feet



                        4 fingers on each of two hands.

                        4 toes on each of two feet.



                        The feet don't even have to be fully prehensile. Just usable enough that they'd think to count them. After their civilization creates their math system, their culture can also move to one that wears shoes and so forth. The feet don't have to be highly visible today.



                        Make it a cooperative culture



                        If the math system comes from two people working together, then two pairs of hands—each with 4 fingers—gives you your perfect 16.



                        Count other body parts



                        When my daughter was learning math, I encouraged her to count on her body to get the process started. For numbers higher than 10, we sometimes used my fingers, sometimes her toes, and other times her face.



                        8 fingers + 2 ears + 2 eyes + 2 lips + 2 nostrils = 16



                        Or use any other body parts you desire, including ones that might be particular to this species.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



                        Give them prehensile feet



                        4 fingers on each of two hands.

                        4 toes on each of two feet.



                        The feet don't even have to be fully prehensile. Just usable enough that they'd think to count them. After their civilization creates their math system, their culture can also move to one that wears shoes and so forth. The feet don't have to be highly visible today.



                        Make it a cooperative culture



                        If the math system comes from two people working together, then two pairs of hands—each with 4 fingers—gives you your perfect 16.



                        Count other body parts



                        When my daughter was learning math, I encouraged her to count on her body to get the process started. For numbers higher than 10, we sometimes used my fingers, sometimes her toes, and other times her face.



                        8 fingers + 2 ears + 2 eyes + 2 lips + 2 nostrils = 16



                        Or use any other body parts you desire, including ones that might be particular to this species.







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered 7 hours ago









                        CynCyn

                        18.8k2 gold badges37 silver badges84 bronze badges




                        18.8k2 gold badges37 silver badges84 bronze badges
























                            1













                            $begingroup$

                            Why not a primate like species with three fingers and an opposable thumb on each hand for a total of 16 digits. Primates are largely adapted to use both hands and feet for grasping with Hominids (those silly creatures we call humans) being an exception (they have less dexterous feet than most primates, as an adaptation for bipedial locomotion necessitated some design changes. Still, it's not unheard of for a human to be quite adapt at dexterous manipulation of tools with their feet and some practice. I once met a man with no arms, who played a mean guitar and had a specially adapted steering device he used to drive a car).



                            The counting system of base 16 would evolve from using all four limbs in counting, since their society would likely have equally used all limbs for movement.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



















                              1













                              $begingroup$

                              Why not a primate like species with three fingers and an opposable thumb on each hand for a total of 16 digits. Primates are largely adapted to use both hands and feet for grasping with Hominids (those silly creatures we call humans) being an exception (they have less dexterous feet than most primates, as an adaptation for bipedial locomotion necessitated some design changes. Still, it's not unheard of for a human to be quite adapt at dexterous manipulation of tools with their feet and some practice. I once met a man with no arms, who played a mean guitar and had a specially adapted steering device he used to drive a car).



                              The counting system of base 16 would evolve from using all four limbs in counting, since their society would likely have equally used all limbs for movement.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$

















                                1














                                1










                                1







                                $begingroup$

                                Why not a primate like species with three fingers and an opposable thumb on each hand for a total of 16 digits. Primates are largely adapted to use both hands and feet for grasping with Hominids (those silly creatures we call humans) being an exception (they have less dexterous feet than most primates, as an adaptation for bipedial locomotion necessitated some design changes. Still, it's not unheard of for a human to be quite adapt at dexterous manipulation of tools with their feet and some practice. I once met a man with no arms, who played a mean guitar and had a specially adapted steering device he used to drive a car).



                                The counting system of base 16 would evolve from using all four limbs in counting, since their society would likely have equally used all limbs for movement.






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$



                                Why not a primate like species with three fingers and an opposable thumb on each hand for a total of 16 digits. Primates are largely adapted to use both hands and feet for grasping with Hominids (those silly creatures we call humans) being an exception (they have less dexterous feet than most primates, as an adaptation for bipedial locomotion necessitated some design changes. Still, it's not unheard of for a human to be quite adapt at dexterous manipulation of tools with their feet and some practice. I once met a man with no arms, who played a mean guitar and had a specially adapted steering device he used to drive a car).



                                The counting system of base 16 would evolve from using all four limbs in counting, since their society would likely have equally used all limbs for movement.







                                share|improve this answer












                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer










                                answered 7 hours ago









                                hszmvhszmv

                                6,0306 silver badges17 bronze badges




                                6,0306 silver badges17 bronze badges
























                                    0













                                    $begingroup$

                                    The base in which numbers are represented doesn't change, ease, or inform mathematics. All it changes is arithmetic.



                                    The number of digits, arms, feet, eyes, knuckles, gill slits, or kinks in their prehensile tails won't change the brilliance, insight, and utility of the math your species develops.






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



















                                      0













                                      $begingroup$

                                      The base in which numbers are represented doesn't change, ease, or inform mathematics. All it changes is arithmetic.



                                      The number of digits, arms, feet, eyes, knuckles, gill slits, or kinks in their prehensile tails won't change the brilliance, insight, and utility of the math your species develops.






                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$

















                                        0














                                        0










                                        0







                                        $begingroup$

                                        The base in which numbers are represented doesn't change, ease, or inform mathematics. All it changes is arithmetic.



                                        The number of digits, arms, feet, eyes, knuckles, gill slits, or kinks in their prehensile tails won't change the brilliance, insight, and utility of the math your species develops.






                                        share|improve this answer









                                        $endgroup$



                                        The base in which numbers are represented doesn't change, ease, or inform mathematics. All it changes is arithmetic.



                                        The number of digits, arms, feet, eyes, knuckles, gill slits, or kinks in their prehensile tails won't change the brilliance, insight, and utility of the math your species develops.







                                        share|improve this answer












                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer










                                        answered 1 hour ago









                                        cmmcmm

                                        1,6475 silver badges11 bronze badges




                                        1,6475 silver badges11 bronze badges
























                                            0













                                            $begingroup$

                                            Your aliens are smart. So they use the four fingers they have on one hand to represent all their 16 digits by using a different combination for each:



                                            • 0 = closed fist

                                            • 1 = only thumb stretched out

                                            • 2 = only index finger stretched out

                                            • 3 = index + thumb

                                            • 4 = only ring finger (there is no middle finger!)

                                            • 5 = ring + thumb

                                            • 6 = ring + index

                                            • 7 = ring + index + thumb

                                            • 8 = only pinky

                                            • 9 = pinky + ...

                                            With their two hands, they can either remember two different digits at the same time, or put them together to form a 2-digit number. This allows them to count up to 255 with their fingers.



                                            Your aliens actually envy the humans for our fifth finger, realizing that humans are able to count up to 1023 on their fingers alone... if only they would recognize the full power of their ten fingers!



                                            (Full disclosure: Even humans can learn to use their fingers efficiently, counting mindlessly from zero to 31 on a single hand, and I'm proof of that. I only need to make sure that I don't inadvertendly show someone a 4... 1 is ok, 6 is ok, 18 is reserved for concerts...)






                                            share|improve this answer









                                            $endgroup$



















                                              0













                                              $begingroup$

                                              Your aliens are smart. So they use the four fingers they have on one hand to represent all their 16 digits by using a different combination for each:



                                              • 0 = closed fist

                                              • 1 = only thumb stretched out

                                              • 2 = only index finger stretched out

                                              • 3 = index + thumb

                                              • 4 = only ring finger (there is no middle finger!)

                                              • 5 = ring + thumb

                                              • 6 = ring + index

                                              • 7 = ring + index + thumb

                                              • 8 = only pinky

                                              • 9 = pinky + ...

                                              With their two hands, they can either remember two different digits at the same time, or put them together to form a 2-digit number. This allows them to count up to 255 with their fingers.



                                              Your aliens actually envy the humans for our fifth finger, realizing that humans are able to count up to 1023 on their fingers alone... if only they would recognize the full power of their ten fingers!



                                              (Full disclosure: Even humans can learn to use their fingers efficiently, counting mindlessly from zero to 31 on a single hand, and I'm proof of that. I only need to make sure that I don't inadvertendly show someone a 4... 1 is ok, 6 is ok, 18 is reserved for concerts...)






                                              share|improve this answer









                                              $endgroup$

















                                                0














                                                0










                                                0







                                                $begingroup$

                                                Your aliens are smart. So they use the four fingers they have on one hand to represent all their 16 digits by using a different combination for each:



                                                • 0 = closed fist

                                                • 1 = only thumb stretched out

                                                • 2 = only index finger stretched out

                                                • 3 = index + thumb

                                                • 4 = only ring finger (there is no middle finger!)

                                                • 5 = ring + thumb

                                                • 6 = ring + index

                                                • 7 = ring + index + thumb

                                                • 8 = only pinky

                                                • 9 = pinky + ...

                                                With their two hands, they can either remember two different digits at the same time, or put them together to form a 2-digit number. This allows them to count up to 255 with their fingers.



                                                Your aliens actually envy the humans for our fifth finger, realizing that humans are able to count up to 1023 on their fingers alone... if only they would recognize the full power of their ten fingers!



                                                (Full disclosure: Even humans can learn to use their fingers efficiently, counting mindlessly from zero to 31 on a single hand, and I'm proof of that. I only need to make sure that I don't inadvertendly show someone a 4... 1 is ok, 6 is ok, 18 is reserved for concerts...)






                                                share|improve this answer









                                                $endgroup$



                                                Your aliens are smart. So they use the four fingers they have on one hand to represent all their 16 digits by using a different combination for each:



                                                • 0 = closed fist

                                                • 1 = only thumb stretched out

                                                • 2 = only index finger stretched out

                                                • 3 = index + thumb

                                                • 4 = only ring finger (there is no middle finger!)

                                                • 5 = ring + thumb

                                                • 6 = ring + index

                                                • 7 = ring + index + thumb

                                                • 8 = only pinky

                                                • 9 = pinky + ...

                                                With their two hands, they can either remember two different digits at the same time, or put them together to form a 2-digit number. This allows them to count up to 255 with their fingers.



                                                Your aliens actually envy the humans for our fifth finger, realizing that humans are able to count up to 1023 on their fingers alone... if only they would recognize the full power of their ten fingers!



                                                (Full disclosure: Even humans can learn to use their fingers efficiently, counting mindlessly from zero to 31 on a single hand, and I'm proof of that. I only need to make sure that I don't inadvertendly show someone a 4... 1 is ok, 6 is ok, 18 is reserved for concerts...)







                                                share|improve this answer












                                                share|improve this answer



                                                share|improve this answer










                                                answered 34 mins ago









                                                cmastercmaster

                                                3,98110 silver badges16 bronze badges




                                                3,98110 silver badges16 bronze badges






























                                                    draft saved

                                                    draft discarded
















































                                                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                                    But avoid


                                                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                                    draft saved


                                                    draft discarded














                                                    StackExchange.ready(
                                                    function ()
                                                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f153914%2fnumber-of-fingers-for-a-math-oriented-race%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                                    );

                                                    Post as a guest















                                                    Required, but never shown





















































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown

































                                                    Required, but never shown














                                                    Required, but never shown












                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Required, but never shown







                                                    Popular posts from this blog

                                                    19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                                                    Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                                                    Черчино Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију46°09′29″ СГШ; 9°30′29″ ИГД / 46.15809° СГШ; 9.50814° ИГД / 46.15809; 9.5081446°09′29″ СГШ; 9°30′29″ ИГД / 46.15809° СГШ; 9.50814° ИГД / 46.15809; 9.508143179111„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”Званични веб-сајтпроширитиуу