Why does the weaker C–H bond have a higher wavenumber than the C=O bond?What does the peak separation of carbon dioxide IR rotational-vibrational spectrum corresponds to and why?Does DCl have a higher rotational partition function (qrot) than HCl? And if so why?Why does nitrous oxide have 300 times the global warming potential of CO2?Why does the C–C bond have extremely weak absorptions?For two compounds that are symmetrical, why does the more compact one have a higher melting point?Why do the unsaturated ketones have C-O bond weaker than saturated ketones? How it is related to resonance structures?Why does ethane release more energy than ethyne when burned?CO-vibration in metal carbonylWhy do Ketones Have Lower Wavenumbers than Esters?
Do sharpies or markers damage soft rock climbing gear?
Can I use coax outlets for cable modem?
How to determine algebraically whether an equation has an infinite solutions or not?
Videos of surgery
How to force GCC to assume that a floating-point expression is non-negative?
How could a self contained organic body propel itself in space
Why does Windows store Wi-Fi passwords in a reversible format?
Units in general relativity
Alternatives to Network Backup
Why didn't Doc believe Marty was from the future?
What is Soda Fountain Etiquette?
Is the internet in Madagascar faster than in UK?
Why did Lucius make a deal out of Buckbeak hurting Draco but not about Draco being turned into a ferret?
How do solar inverter systems easily add AC power sources together?
If I said I had $100 when asked, but I actually had $200, would I be lying by omission?
Why is there not a willingness from the world to step in between Pakistan and India?
Can a character use multiple reactions in response to the same trigger?
How to say "I only speak one which is English." in French?
How can I add lights and a switch downstream of a pull-chain fixture?
Why can't you say don't instead of won't?
What is the sound/audio equivalent of "unsightly"?
How can I download a file from a host I can only SSH to through another host?
Fantasy Macro Economics: What would Merfolk Trade?
Why is explainability not one of the criteria for publication?
Why does the weaker C–H bond have a higher wavenumber than the C=O bond?
What does the peak separation of carbon dioxide IR rotational-vibrational spectrum corresponds to and why?Does DCl have a higher rotational partition function (qrot) than HCl? And if so why?Why does nitrous oxide have 300 times the global warming potential of CO2?Why does the C–C bond have extremely weak absorptions?For two compounds that are symmetrical, why does the more compact one have a higher melting point?Why do the unsaturated ketones have C-O bond weaker than saturated ketones? How it is related to resonance structures?Why does ethane release more energy than ethyne when burned?CO-vibration in metal carbonylWhy do Ketones Have Lower Wavenumbers than Esters?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
My understanding is that a stronger bond has a higher wavenumber in IR spectrum. But why does the C–H vibration have a higher wavenumber than the C=O vibration? The latter is a double bond, so I think it should be a stronger bond than the C–H single bond.
physical-chemistry analytical-chemistry ir-spectroscopy
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My understanding is that a stronger bond has a higher wavenumber in IR spectrum. But why does the C–H vibration have a higher wavenumber than the C=O vibration? The latter is a double bond, so I think it should be a stronger bond than the C–H single bond.
physical-chemistry analytical-chemistry ir-spectroscopy
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
My understanding is that a stronger bond has a higher wavenumber in IR spectrum. But why does the C–H vibration have a higher wavenumber than the C=O vibration? The latter is a double bond, so I think it should be a stronger bond than the C–H single bond.
physical-chemistry analytical-chemistry ir-spectroscopy
New contributor
$endgroup$
My understanding is that a stronger bond has a higher wavenumber in IR spectrum. But why does the C–H vibration have a higher wavenumber than the C=O vibration? The latter is a double bond, so I think it should be a stronger bond than the C–H single bond.
physical-chemistry analytical-chemistry ir-spectroscopy
physical-chemistry analytical-chemistry ir-spectroscopy
New contributor
New contributor
edited 7 hours ago
orthocresol♦
43k7 gold badges134 silver badges264 bronze badges
43k7 gold badges134 silver badges264 bronze badges
New contributor
asked 8 hours ago
michael morganmichael morgan
241 bronze badge
241 bronze badge
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A property of the harmonic oscillator is that the oscillation frequency, $omega$, is dependent not only on $k$ (the spring constant) but also on the mass $m$ of the object:
$$omega = sqrtfrackm$$
We can crudely model a chemical bond as a two-body harmonic oscillator, which largely obeys the same rule, except that the mass must be replaced with the reduced mass $mu$, defined by:
$$frac1mu = frac1m_1 + frac1m_2$$
where $m_1$ and $m_2$ are the masses of the two bodies. So, for a C–H bond, we have
$$frac1mu_ceCH = frac1pu12 u + frac1pu1 u implies mu_ceCH = pu0.923 u$$
and for a C=O bond, we have
$$frac1mu_ceCO = frac1pu12 u + frac1pu16 u implies mu_ceCO = pu6.86 u$$
From J. Chem. Phys. 1946, 14 (5), 305–320 the force constant $k$ for the C=O bond in formaldehyde is approximately $2.46$ times that for the C–H bond in methane (the units are in the old cgs system, so I am lazy to quote the actual values).
So, we can come up with a very rough theoretical estimate. The wavenumber used in IR spectroscopy, denoted by $barnu$, is directly proportional to the (angular) frequency $omega$.
$$beginalign
fracbarnu_ceCHbarnu_ceCO &= fracomega_ceCH / 2pi comega_ceCO / 2pi c \
&= fracomega_ceCHomega_ceCO \
&= sqrtfrack_ceCHk_ceCO cdot fracmu_ceCOmu_ceCH \
&= sqrtfrac12.46 cdot fracpu6.86 upu0.923 u \
&= 1.74
endalign$$
This is not too far from the experimental value of $pu2900 cm-1/pu1730 cm-1 = 1.68$ (using values in the middle of the typical ranges for alkanes and aldehydes).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks. Did not realize the mass matter that much.
$endgroup$
– michael morgan
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@michaelmorgan please consider upvoting / accepting one of the answers if they helped you; see also chemistry.stackexchange.com/help/someone-answers
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
According to Skoog, Analytical Chemistry:
Using classical mechanics, assuming a diatomic molecule, the frequency of vibration $nu$ may be described by
$$nu = frac12pi sqrtfrackmu $$
where $k$ represents the force constant of this bond, and $mu$ the reduced mass of the particles bond together, defined as
$$mu = fracm_1 cdot m_2 m_1 + m_2$$
An equivalent quantum chemical / mechanial description includes $c$, the speed of light, yielding a result expressing the radiation in wavenumbers:
$$barnu = frac12pi cdot c sqrtfrackmu $$
So (1), with the same reduced mass $mu$, the observed frequency increases with increasing force constant $k$. And (2) $nu$ equally increases while lowering the reduced mass $mu$.
Skoog further mentions as typical force constant of single bonds the range of $3 times 10^2 ldots 8 times 10^2,puN m^-1 $ with an average of $5 times 10^2,puN m^-1$; while stating $1 times 10^3,puN m^-1$ and $1.5 times 10^3,puN m^-1$ for typical double, and triple bonds, respecitively.
Consequently, for a carbonyl $ceC=O$ double bond, assuming as the mass $m_1$ of a carbon atom of
$$m_1 = frac12 times 10^-3,pukg / mol 6.0 times 10^23,puatoms / mol times 1,puatom = 2.0 times 10^-26,pukg$$
and for oxygen a mass $m_2 = 2.7 times 10^-26,pukg / atom$,
yields a reduced mass $mu = 1.1 times 10^-26,pukg$. Using the above mentioned equation determines as vibration frequency (in wavenumbers) a value of
$$barnu = 5.3 times 10^-12,pus cdot cm^-1 sqrtfrac1 times 10^3,puN cdot m^-11.1 times 10^-26,pukg = 1.6 times 10^3pucm^-1$$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
michael morgan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f119664%2fwhy-does-the-weaker-c-h-bond-have-a-higher-wavenumber-than-the-c-o-bond%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
A property of the harmonic oscillator is that the oscillation frequency, $omega$, is dependent not only on $k$ (the spring constant) but also on the mass $m$ of the object:
$$omega = sqrtfrackm$$
We can crudely model a chemical bond as a two-body harmonic oscillator, which largely obeys the same rule, except that the mass must be replaced with the reduced mass $mu$, defined by:
$$frac1mu = frac1m_1 + frac1m_2$$
where $m_1$ and $m_2$ are the masses of the two bodies. So, for a C–H bond, we have
$$frac1mu_ceCH = frac1pu12 u + frac1pu1 u implies mu_ceCH = pu0.923 u$$
and for a C=O bond, we have
$$frac1mu_ceCO = frac1pu12 u + frac1pu16 u implies mu_ceCO = pu6.86 u$$
From J. Chem. Phys. 1946, 14 (5), 305–320 the force constant $k$ for the C=O bond in formaldehyde is approximately $2.46$ times that for the C–H bond in methane (the units are in the old cgs system, so I am lazy to quote the actual values).
So, we can come up with a very rough theoretical estimate. The wavenumber used in IR spectroscopy, denoted by $barnu$, is directly proportional to the (angular) frequency $omega$.
$$beginalign
fracbarnu_ceCHbarnu_ceCO &= fracomega_ceCH / 2pi comega_ceCO / 2pi c \
&= fracomega_ceCHomega_ceCO \
&= sqrtfrack_ceCHk_ceCO cdot fracmu_ceCOmu_ceCH \
&= sqrtfrac12.46 cdot fracpu6.86 upu0.923 u \
&= 1.74
endalign$$
This is not too far from the experimental value of $pu2900 cm-1/pu1730 cm-1 = 1.68$ (using values in the middle of the typical ranges for alkanes and aldehydes).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks. Did not realize the mass matter that much.
$endgroup$
– michael morgan
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@michaelmorgan please consider upvoting / accepting one of the answers if they helped you; see also chemistry.stackexchange.com/help/someone-answers
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A property of the harmonic oscillator is that the oscillation frequency, $omega$, is dependent not only on $k$ (the spring constant) but also on the mass $m$ of the object:
$$omega = sqrtfrackm$$
We can crudely model a chemical bond as a two-body harmonic oscillator, which largely obeys the same rule, except that the mass must be replaced with the reduced mass $mu$, defined by:
$$frac1mu = frac1m_1 + frac1m_2$$
where $m_1$ and $m_2$ are the masses of the two bodies. So, for a C–H bond, we have
$$frac1mu_ceCH = frac1pu12 u + frac1pu1 u implies mu_ceCH = pu0.923 u$$
and for a C=O bond, we have
$$frac1mu_ceCO = frac1pu12 u + frac1pu16 u implies mu_ceCO = pu6.86 u$$
From J. Chem. Phys. 1946, 14 (5), 305–320 the force constant $k$ for the C=O bond in formaldehyde is approximately $2.46$ times that for the C–H bond in methane (the units are in the old cgs system, so I am lazy to quote the actual values).
So, we can come up with a very rough theoretical estimate. The wavenumber used in IR spectroscopy, denoted by $barnu$, is directly proportional to the (angular) frequency $omega$.
$$beginalign
fracbarnu_ceCHbarnu_ceCO &= fracomega_ceCH / 2pi comega_ceCO / 2pi c \
&= fracomega_ceCHomega_ceCO \
&= sqrtfrack_ceCHk_ceCO cdot fracmu_ceCOmu_ceCH \
&= sqrtfrac12.46 cdot fracpu6.86 upu0.923 u \
&= 1.74
endalign$$
This is not too far from the experimental value of $pu2900 cm-1/pu1730 cm-1 = 1.68$ (using values in the middle of the typical ranges for alkanes and aldehydes).
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks. Did not realize the mass matter that much.
$endgroup$
– michael morgan
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@michaelmorgan please consider upvoting / accepting one of the answers if they helped you; see also chemistry.stackexchange.com/help/someone-answers
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A property of the harmonic oscillator is that the oscillation frequency, $omega$, is dependent not only on $k$ (the spring constant) but also on the mass $m$ of the object:
$$omega = sqrtfrackm$$
We can crudely model a chemical bond as a two-body harmonic oscillator, which largely obeys the same rule, except that the mass must be replaced with the reduced mass $mu$, defined by:
$$frac1mu = frac1m_1 + frac1m_2$$
where $m_1$ and $m_2$ are the masses of the two bodies. So, for a C–H bond, we have
$$frac1mu_ceCH = frac1pu12 u + frac1pu1 u implies mu_ceCH = pu0.923 u$$
and for a C=O bond, we have
$$frac1mu_ceCO = frac1pu12 u + frac1pu16 u implies mu_ceCO = pu6.86 u$$
From J. Chem. Phys. 1946, 14 (5), 305–320 the force constant $k$ for the C=O bond in formaldehyde is approximately $2.46$ times that for the C–H bond in methane (the units are in the old cgs system, so I am lazy to quote the actual values).
So, we can come up with a very rough theoretical estimate. The wavenumber used in IR spectroscopy, denoted by $barnu$, is directly proportional to the (angular) frequency $omega$.
$$beginalign
fracbarnu_ceCHbarnu_ceCO &= fracomega_ceCH / 2pi comega_ceCO / 2pi c \
&= fracomega_ceCHomega_ceCO \
&= sqrtfrack_ceCHk_ceCO cdot fracmu_ceCOmu_ceCH \
&= sqrtfrac12.46 cdot fracpu6.86 upu0.923 u \
&= 1.74
endalign$$
This is not too far from the experimental value of $pu2900 cm-1/pu1730 cm-1 = 1.68$ (using values in the middle of the typical ranges for alkanes and aldehydes).
$endgroup$
A property of the harmonic oscillator is that the oscillation frequency, $omega$, is dependent not only on $k$ (the spring constant) but also on the mass $m$ of the object:
$$omega = sqrtfrackm$$
We can crudely model a chemical bond as a two-body harmonic oscillator, which largely obeys the same rule, except that the mass must be replaced with the reduced mass $mu$, defined by:
$$frac1mu = frac1m_1 + frac1m_2$$
where $m_1$ and $m_2$ are the masses of the two bodies. So, for a C–H bond, we have
$$frac1mu_ceCH = frac1pu12 u + frac1pu1 u implies mu_ceCH = pu0.923 u$$
and for a C=O bond, we have
$$frac1mu_ceCO = frac1pu12 u + frac1pu16 u implies mu_ceCO = pu6.86 u$$
From J. Chem. Phys. 1946, 14 (5), 305–320 the force constant $k$ for the C=O bond in formaldehyde is approximately $2.46$ times that for the C–H bond in methane (the units are in the old cgs system, so I am lazy to quote the actual values).
So, we can come up with a very rough theoretical estimate. The wavenumber used in IR spectroscopy, denoted by $barnu$, is directly proportional to the (angular) frequency $omega$.
$$beginalign
fracbarnu_ceCHbarnu_ceCO &= fracomega_ceCH / 2pi comega_ceCO / 2pi c \
&= fracomega_ceCHomega_ceCO \
&= sqrtfrack_ceCHk_ceCO cdot fracmu_ceCOmu_ceCH \
&= sqrtfrac12.46 cdot fracpu6.86 upu0.923 u \
&= 1.74
endalign$$
This is not too far from the experimental value of $pu2900 cm-1/pu1730 cm-1 = 1.68$ (using values in the middle of the typical ranges for alkanes and aldehydes).
answered 7 hours ago
orthocresol♦orthocresol
43k7 gold badges134 silver badges264 bronze badges
43k7 gold badges134 silver badges264 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thanks. Did not realize the mass matter that much.
$endgroup$
– michael morgan
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@michaelmorgan please consider upvoting / accepting one of the answers if they helped you; see also chemistry.stackexchange.com/help/someone-answers
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks. Did not realize the mass matter that much.
$endgroup$
– michael morgan
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@michaelmorgan please consider upvoting / accepting one of the answers if they helped you; see also chemistry.stackexchange.com/help/someone-answers
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. Did not realize the mass matter that much.
$endgroup$
– michael morgan
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks. Did not realize the mass matter that much.
$endgroup$
– michael morgan
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@michaelmorgan please consider upvoting / accepting one of the answers if they helped you; see also chemistry.stackexchange.com/help/someone-answers
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@michaelmorgan please consider upvoting / accepting one of the answers if they helped you; see also chemistry.stackexchange.com/help/someone-answers
$endgroup$
– orthocresol♦
5 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
According to Skoog, Analytical Chemistry:
Using classical mechanics, assuming a diatomic molecule, the frequency of vibration $nu$ may be described by
$$nu = frac12pi sqrtfrackmu $$
where $k$ represents the force constant of this bond, and $mu$ the reduced mass of the particles bond together, defined as
$$mu = fracm_1 cdot m_2 m_1 + m_2$$
An equivalent quantum chemical / mechanial description includes $c$, the speed of light, yielding a result expressing the radiation in wavenumbers:
$$barnu = frac12pi cdot c sqrtfrackmu $$
So (1), with the same reduced mass $mu$, the observed frequency increases with increasing force constant $k$. And (2) $nu$ equally increases while lowering the reduced mass $mu$.
Skoog further mentions as typical force constant of single bonds the range of $3 times 10^2 ldots 8 times 10^2,puN m^-1 $ with an average of $5 times 10^2,puN m^-1$; while stating $1 times 10^3,puN m^-1$ and $1.5 times 10^3,puN m^-1$ for typical double, and triple bonds, respecitively.
Consequently, for a carbonyl $ceC=O$ double bond, assuming as the mass $m_1$ of a carbon atom of
$$m_1 = frac12 times 10^-3,pukg / mol 6.0 times 10^23,puatoms / mol times 1,puatom = 2.0 times 10^-26,pukg$$
and for oxygen a mass $m_2 = 2.7 times 10^-26,pukg / atom$,
yields a reduced mass $mu = 1.1 times 10^-26,pukg$. Using the above mentioned equation determines as vibration frequency (in wavenumbers) a value of
$$barnu = 5.3 times 10^-12,pus cdot cm^-1 sqrtfrac1 times 10^3,puN cdot m^-11.1 times 10^-26,pukg = 1.6 times 10^3pucm^-1$$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
According to Skoog, Analytical Chemistry:
Using classical mechanics, assuming a diatomic molecule, the frequency of vibration $nu$ may be described by
$$nu = frac12pi sqrtfrackmu $$
where $k$ represents the force constant of this bond, and $mu$ the reduced mass of the particles bond together, defined as
$$mu = fracm_1 cdot m_2 m_1 + m_2$$
An equivalent quantum chemical / mechanial description includes $c$, the speed of light, yielding a result expressing the radiation in wavenumbers:
$$barnu = frac12pi cdot c sqrtfrackmu $$
So (1), with the same reduced mass $mu$, the observed frequency increases with increasing force constant $k$. And (2) $nu$ equally increases while lowering the reduced mass $mu$.
Skoog further mentions as typical force constant of single bonds the range of $3 times 10^2 ldots 8 times 10^2,puN m^-1 $ with an average of $5 times 10^2,puN m^-1$; while stating $1 times 10^3,puN m^-1$ and $1.5 times 10^3,puN m^-1$ for typical double, and triple bonds, respecitively.
Consequently, for a carbonyl $ceC=O$ double bond, assuming as the mass $m_1$ of a carbon atom of
$$m_1 = frac12 times 10^-3,pukg / mol 6.0 times 10^23,puatoms / mol times 1,puatom = 2.0 times 10^-26,pukg$$
and for oxygen a mass $m_2 = 2.7 times 10^-26,pukg / atom$,
yields a reduced mass $mu = 1.1 times 10^-26,pukg$. Using the above mentioned equation determines as vibration frequency (in wavenumbers) a value of
$$barnu = 5.3 times 10^-12,pus cdot cm^-1 sqrtfrac1 times 10^3,puN cdot m^-11.1 times 10^-26,pukg = 1.6 times 10^3pucm^-1$$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
According to Skoog, Analytical Chemistry:
Using classical mechanics, assuming a diatomic molecule, the frequency of vibration $nu$ may be described by
$$nu = frac12pi sqrtfrackmu $$
where $k$ represents the force constant of this bond, and $mu$ the reduced mass of the particles bond together, defined as
$$mu = fracm_1 cdot m_2 m_1 + m_2$$
An equivalent quantum chemical / mechanial description includes $c$, the speed of light, yielding a result expressing the radiation in wavenumbers:
$$barnu = frac12pi cdot c sqrtfrackmu $$
So (1), with the same reduced mass $mu$, the observed frequency increases with increasing force constant $k$. And (2) $nu$ equally increases while lowering the reduced mass $mu$.
Skoog further mentions as typical force constant of single bonds the range of $3 times 10^2 ldots 8 times 10^2,puN m^-1 $ with an average of $5 times 10^2,puN m^-1$; while stating $1 times 10^3,puN m^-1$ and $1.5 times 10^3,puN m^-1$ for typical double, and triple bonds, respecitively.
Consequently, for a carbonyl $ceC=O$ double bond, assuming as the mass $m_1$ of a carbon atom of
$$m_1 = frac12 times 10^-3,pukg / mol 6.0 times 10^23,puatoms / mol times 1,puatom = 2.0 times 10^-26,pukg$$
and for oxygen a mass $m_2 = 2.7 times 10^-26,pukg / atom$,
yields a reduced mass $mu = 1.1 times 10^-26,pukg$. Using the above mentioned equation determines as vibration frequency (in wavenumbers) a value of
$$barnu = 5.3 times 10^-12,pus cdot cm^-1 sqrtfrac1 times 10^3,puN cdot m^-11.1 times 10^-26,pukg = 1.6 times 10^3pucm^-1$$.
$endgroup$
According to Skoog, Analytical Chemistry:
Using classical mechanics, assuming a diatomic molecule, the frequency of vibration $nu$ may be described by
$$nu = frac12pi sqrtfrackmu $$
where $k$ represents the force constant of this bond, and $mu$ the reduced mass of the particles bond together, defined as
$$mu = fracm_1 cdot m_2 m_1 + m_2$$
An equivalent quantum chemical / mechanial description includes $c$, the speed of light, yielding a result expressing the radiation in wavenumbers:
$$barnu = frac12pi cdot c sqrtfrackmu $$
So (1), with the same reduced mass $mu$, the observed frequency increases with increasing force constant $k$. And (2) $nu$ equally increases while lowering the reduced mass $mu$.
Skoog further mentions as typical force constant of single bonds the range of $3 times 10^2 ldots 8 times 10^2,puN m^-1 $ with an average of $5 times 10^2,puN m^-1$; while stating $1 times 10^3,puN m^-1$ and $1.5 times 10^3,puN m^-1$ for typical double, and triple bonds, respecitively.
Consequently, for a carbonyl $ceC=O$ double bond, assuming as the mass $m_1$ of a carbon atom of
$$m_1 = frac12 times 10^-3,pukg / mol 6.0 times 10^23,puatoms / mol times 1,puatom = 2.0 times 10^-26,pukg$$
and for oxygen a mass $m_2 = 2.7 times 10^-26,pukg / atom$,
yields a reduced mass $mu = 1.1 times 10^-26,pukg$. Using the above mentioned equation determines as vibration frequency (in wavenumbers) a value of
$$barnu = 5.3 times 10^-12,pus cdot cm^-1 sqrtfrac1 times 10^3,puN cdot m^-11.1 times 10^-26,pukg = 1.6 times 10^3pucm^-1$$.
answered 6 hours ago
ButtonwoodButtonwood
10.7k1 gold badge22 silver badges46 bronze badges
10.7k1 gold badge22 silver badges46 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
michael morgan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
michael morgan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
michael morgan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
michael morgan is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f119664%2fwhy-does-the-weaker-c-h-bond-have-a-higher-wavenumber-than-the-c-o-bond%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown