How does Query decide the order in which the functions are applied?Struggling to understand QueryHow to keep Collect[] result in order?How do I get a two-term polynomial with a leading negative sign to display in the correct (i.e. textbook) order?Possible bug involving Dataset/Query and RightCompositionPreventing Keys from appearing in Query Output (+ the casting of Ascending/Descending operators)Is the output to Solve ordered or are the solutions randomly placed?Simplifying a reverse Fold for a Queryhow to order a parameter by power?How to filter this nested list of AssociationHow to pull out the underlying query syntax being used by dataset?
My colleague treats me like he's my boss, yet we're on the same level
Should a TA point out a professor's mistake while attending their lecture?
Can the inductive kick be discharged without a freewheeling diode, in this example?
Fishing from underwater domes
What's the origin of the concept of alternate dimensions/realities?
Why haven't the British protested Brexit as ardently as the Hong Kong protesters?
Can authors email you PDFs of their textbook for free?
Can a system of three stars exist?
Understanding data transmission rates over copper wire
Calculate Landau's function
How would a disabled person earn their living in a medieval-type town?
Moving DNS hosting for Active site to Route 53 - with G Suite MX TTL of 1 week
LINQ Extension methods MinBy and MaxBy
Am I required to correct my opponent's assumptions about my morph creatures?
Break down the phrase "shitsurei shinakereba naranaindesu"
What caused the end of cybernetic implants?
Confidence intervals for the mean of a sample of counts
How can I portray a character with no fear of death, without them sounding utterly bored?
Can a pet cat attune to a magical item?
What kind of electrical outlet is this? Red, winking-face shape
How to save money by shopping at a variety of grocery stores?
Is Borg adaptation only temporary?
Necessity of tenure for lifetime academic research
How could reincarnation magic be limited to prevent overuse?
How does Query decide the order in which the functions are applied?
Struggling to understand QueryHow to keep Collect[] result in order?How do I get a two-term polynomial with a leading negative sign to display in the correct (i.e. textbook) order?Possible bug involving Dataset/Query and RightCompositionPreventing Keys from appearing in Query Output (+ the casting of Ascending/Descending operators)Is the output to Solve ordered or are the solutions randomly placed?Simplifying a reverse Fold for a Queryhow to order a parameter by power?How to filter this nested list of AssociationHow to pull out the underlying query syntax being used by dataset?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
First of all I know that Query
is a nice way to organize your functions that are applying at specific levels of an expression. But I don't understand the order in which they are applied.
Consider the following dataset as an example.
data=
<
If I were to apply the following Query on this dataset:
Query[
ReverseSortBy["field 3"],
StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
]@data
Then I get:
"78", "45", "12"
This means that first the function ReverseSortBy["field 3"]
is applied to the entire expression to reverse the order based on "field 3" and then on each sub level the function StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
is applied to get the joined values from the two fields.
Note the order of application cannot be the other way since if StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
is applied on each sub level then the association structure is lost and then ReverseSortBy
will not be able to find the Key
"field 3"
by which to reverse the list of associations.
So following the same idea I add another function:
Query[
ReverseSortBy["field 3"]@*Select[#"field 3">3&],
StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
]@data
The functions must be getting applied from outer to inwards but this fails! Since now magically the order of application has changed from inner to outer.
Note the Map
allows me to move inner level function to outer level and thereby controlling the order precisely as follows to make the above Query
work:
Query[
Map[StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&]@*ReverseSortBy["field 3"]@*Select[#"field 3">3&]
]@data
I get
"78", "45"
as expected! But why did the second Query changed the order of function application and failed? What are the rules governing function application order inside Query
?
query order
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all I know that Query
is a nice way to organize your functions that are applying at specific levels of an expression. But I don't understand the order in which they are applied.
Consider the following dataset as an example.
data=
<
If I were to apply the following Query on this dataset:
Query[
ReverseSortBy["field 3"],
StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
]@data
Then I get:
"78", "45", "12"
This means that first the function ReverseSortBy["field 3"]
is applied to the entire expression to reverse the order based on "field 3" and then on each sub level the function StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
is applied to get the joined values from the two fields.
Note the order of application cannot be the other way since if StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
is applied on each sub level then the association structure is lost and then ReverseSortBy
will not be able to find the Key
"field 3"
by which to reverse the list of associations.
So following the same idea I add another function:
Query[
ReverseSortBy["field 3"]@*Select[#"field 3">3&],
StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
]@data
The functions must be getting applied from outer to inwards but this fails! Since now magically the order of application has changed from inner to outer.
Note the Map
allows me to move inner level function to outer level and thereby controlling the order precisely as follows to make the above Query
work:
Query[
Map[StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&]@*ReverseSortBy["field 3"]@*Select[#"field 3">3&]
]@data
I get
"78", "45"
as expected! But why did the second Query changed the order of function application and failed? What are the rules governing function application order inside Query
?
query order
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
similar: Struggling to understand Query.
$endgroup$
– WReach
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
First of all I know that Query
is a nice way to organize your functions that are applying at specific levels of an expression. But I don't understand the order in which they are applied.
Consider the following dataset as an example.
data=
<
If I were to apply the following Query on this dataset:
Query[
ReverseSortBy["field 3"],
StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
]@data
Then I get:
"78", "45", "12"
This means that first the function ReverseSortBy["field 3"]
is applied to the entire expression to reverse the order based on "field 3" and then on each sub level the function StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
is applied to get the joined values from the two fields.
Note the order of application cannot be the other way since if StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
is applied on each sub level then the association structure is lost and then ReverseSortBy
will not be able to find the Key
"field 3"
by which to reverse the list of associations.
So following the same idea I add another function:
Query[
ReverseSortBy["field 3"]@*Select[#"field 3">3&],
StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
]@data
The functions must be getting applied from outer to inwards but this fails! Since now magically the order of application has changed from inner to outer.
Note the Map
allows me to move inner level function to outer level and thereby controlling the order precisely as follows to make the above Query
work:
Query[
Map[StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&]@*ReverseSortBy["field 3"]@*Select[#"field 3">3&]
]@data
I get
"78", "45"
as expected! But why did the second Query changed the order of function application and failed? What are the rules governing function application order inside Query
?
query order
$endgroup$
First of all I know that Query
is a nice way to organize your functions that are applying at specific levels of an expression. But I don't understand the order in which they are applied.
Consider the following dataset as an example.
data=
<
If I were to apply the following Query on this dataset:
Query[
ReverseSortBy["field 3"],
StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
]@data
Then I get:
"78", "45", "12"
This means that first the function ReverseSortBy["field 3"]
is applied to the entire expression to reverse the order based on "field 3" and then on each sub level the function StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
is applied to get the joined values from the two fields.
Note the order of application cannot be the other way since if StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
is applied on each sub level then the association structure is lost and then ReverseSortBy
will not be able to find the Key
"field 3"
by which to reverse the list of associations.
So following the same idea I add another function:
Query[
ReverseSortBy["field 3"]@*Select[#"field 3">3&],
StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&
]@data
The functions must be getting applied from outer to inwards but this fails! Since now magically the order of application has changed from inner to outer.
Note the Map
allows me to move inner level function to outer level and thereby controlling the order precisely as follows to make the above Query
work:
Query[
Map[StringJoin[ToString/@#"field 1",#"field 2"]&]@*ReverseSortBy["field 3"]@*Select[#"field 3">3&]
]@data
I get
"78", "45"
as expected! But why did the second Query changed the order of function application and failed? What are the rules governing function application order inside Query
?
query order
query order
asked 8 hours ago
user13892user13892
1,9137 silver badges19 bronze badges
1,9137 silver badges19 bronze badges
$begingroup$
similar: Struggling to understand Query.
$endgroup$
– WReach
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
similar: Struggling to understand Query.
$endgroup$
– WReach
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
similar: Struggling to understand Query.
$endgroup$
– WReach
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
similar: Struggling to understand Query.
$endgroup$
– WReach
2 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
@Lee's answer shows how to circumvent the problem by using RightComposition
(/*
) instead of Composition
(@*
), but it does not explain why this works. I will try to explain the "Why" in this answer.
Let's first look at the original example and see how the order is decided. The following is based on the extensive documentation of Query
:
Query
differentiates between two types of operators: "Ascending" and "Descending". First, "descending" operators are applied starting from the outermost one, then "ascending" operators are applied starting from the innermost one:
An "ascending" operator is applied after all subsequent operators have been applied to deeper levels. … »
A "descending" operator is applied to corresponding parts of the original dataset, before subsequent operators are applied at deeper levels. … »
- "Descending" operators include everything that somehow selects parts of the structure (
"key"
,i;;j
,All
,Select[…], …
), or rearranges it (Sort
,SortBy[…]
, …) - Everything else is considered an "ascending" operator. In particular, this includes any unknown operators and custom functions.
With this, we understand why the first example works: As a "descending" operator, ReverseSortBy[…]
is applied before the "ascending" operator StringJoin[…]&
.
In the second case, the first operator is of the form …@*…
or Composition[…,…]
. Since this is not of any of the forms recognized as "descending" operator, both operators are "ascending". This means the inner one is applied first, followed by the outer one.
Now, why does …/*…
(i.e. RightComposition
) work? This is due to the special handling of RightComposition
by Query
. From the "Details & Options" section:
- When one or more descending operators are composed with one or more ascending operators (e.g.
desc /* asc
), the descending part will be applied, then subsequent operators will be applied to deeper levels, and lastly the ascending part will be applied to the result. »
This means that Query
recognizes ReverseSortBy[…]/*Select[…]
as composition of two "descending" operators, which are therefore applied before the "ascending" operator. Select[…]@*ReverseSortBy[…]
on the other hand is not recognized in an analogous way. Unfortunately, I don't know why it was implemented this way, I myself have stumbled over this asymmetry several times already.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Excellent explanation @Lukas Lang.
$endgroup$
– Lee
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using RightComposition in the expression which fails will produce the result you are looking for:
data =
<;
Query[ReverseSortBy["field 3"] /* Select[#"field 3" > 3 &],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &]@data
You can see the difference between Composition
and RightComposition
by viewing the compiled form of the Query with Normal
:
Query[ReverseSortBy["field 3"] @* Select[#"field 3" > 3 &],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &] // Normal
Query[Select[#"field 3" > 3 &] /* ReverseSortBy["field 3"],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &] // Normal
The first expression fails when applied to data
because the output of Map
is a list of strings, whereas Select
is expecting an Association
with a key of "field 3".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204619%2fhow-does-query-decide-the-order-in-which-the-functions-are-applied%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
@Lee's answer shows how to circumvent the problem by using RightComposition
(/*
) instead of Composition
(@*
), but it does not explain why this works. I will try to explain the "Why" in this answer.
Let's first look at the original example and see how the order is decided. The following is based on the extensive documentation of Query
:
Query
differentiates between two types of operators: "Ascending" and "Descending". First, "descending" operators are applied starting from the outermost one, then "ascending" operators are applied starting from the innermost one:
An "ascending" operator is applied after all subsequent operators have been applied to deeper levels. … »
A "descending" operator is applied to corresponding parts of the original dataset, before subsequent operators are applied at deeper levels. … »
- "Descending" operators include everything that somehow selects parts of the structure (
"key"
,i;;j
,All
,Select[…], …
), or rearranges it (Sort
,SortBy[…]
, …) - Everything else is considered an "ascending" operator. In particular, this includes any unknown operators and custom functions.
With this, we understand why the first example works: As a "descending" operator, ReverseSortBy[…]
is applied before the "ascending" operator StringJoin[…]&
.
In the second case, the first operator is of the form …@*…
or Composition[…,…]
. Since this is not of any of the forms recognized as "descending" operator, both operators are "ascending". This means the inner one is applied first, followed by the outer one.
Now, why does …/*…
(i.e. RightComposition
) work? This is due to the special handling of RightComposition
by Query
. From the "Details & Options" section:
- When one or more descending operators are composed with one or more ascending operators (e.g.
desc /* asc
), the descending part will be applied, then subsequent operators will be applied to deeper levels, and lastly the ascending part will be applied to the result. »
This means that Query
recognizes ReverseSortBy[…]/*Select[…]
as composition of two "descending" operators, which are therefore applied before the "ascending" operator. Select[…]@*ReverseSortBy[…]
on the other hand is not recognized in an analogous way. Unfortunately, I don't know why it was implemented this way, I myself have stumbled over this asymmetry several times already.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Excellent explanation @Lukas Lang.
$endgroup$
– Lee
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@Lee's answer shows how to circumvent the problem by using RightComposition
(/*
) instead of Composition
(@*
), but it does not explain why this works. I will try to explain the "Why" in this answer.
Let's first look at the original example and see how the order is decided. The following is based on the extensive documentation of Query
:
Query
differentiates between two types of operators: "Ascending" and "Descending". First, "descending" operators are applied starting from the outermost one, then "ascending" operators are applied starting from the innermost one:
An "ascending" operator is applied after all subsequent operators have been applied to deeper levels. … »
A "descending" operator is applied to corresponding parts of the original dataset, before subsequent operators are applied at deeper levels. … »
- "Descending" operators include everything that somehow selects parts of the structure (
"key"
,i;;j
,All
,Select[…], …
), or rearranges it (Sort
,SortBy[…]
, …) - Everything else is considered an "ascending" operator. In particular, this includes any unknown operators and custom functions.
With this, we understand why the first example works: As a "descending" operator, ReverseSortBy[…]
is applied before the "ascending" operator StringJoin[…]&
.
In the second case, the first operator is of the form …@*…
or Composition[…,…]
. Since this is not of any of the forms recognized as "descending" operator, both operators are "ascending". This means the inner one is applied first, followed by the outer one.
Now, why does …/*…
(i.e. RightComposition
) work? This is due to the special handling of RightComposition
by Query
. From the "Details & Options" section:
- When one or more descending operators are composed with one or more ascending operators (e.g.
desc /* asc
), the descending part will be applied, then subsequent operators will be applied to deeper levels, and lastly the ascending part will be applied to the result. »
This means that Query
recognizes ReverseSortBy[…]/*Select[…]
as composition of two "descending" operators, which are therefore applied before the "ascending" operator. Select[…]@*ReverseSortBy[…]
on the other hand is not recognized in an analogous way. Unfortunately, I don't know why it was implemented this way, I myself have stumbled over this asymmetry several times already.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Excellent explanation @Lukas Lang.
$endgroup$
– Lee
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@Lee's answer shows how to circumvent the problem by using RightComposition
(/*
) instead of Composition
(@*
), but it does not explain why this works. I will try to explain the "Why" in this answer.
Let's first look at the original example and see how the order is decided. The following is based on the extensive documentation of Query
:
Query
differentiates between two types of operators: "Ascending" and "Descending". First, "descending" operators are applied starting from the outermost one, then "ascending" operators are applied starting from the innermost one:
An "ascending" operator is applied after all subsequent operators have been applied to deeper levels. … »
A "descending" operator is applied to corresponding parts of the original dataset, before subsequent operators are applied at deeper levels. … »
- "Descending" operators include everything that somehow selects parts of the structure (
"key"
,i;;j
,All
,Select[…], …
), or rearranges it (Sort
,SortBy[…]
, …) - Everything else is considered an "ascending" operator. In particular, this includes any unknown operators and custom functions.
With this, we understand why the first example works: As a "descending" operator, ReverseSortBy[…]
is applied before the "ascending" operator StringJoin[…]&
.
In the second case, the first operator is of the form …@*…
or Composition[…,…]
. Since this is not of any of the forms recognized as "descending" operator, both operators are "ascending". This means the inner one is applied first, followed by the outer one.
Now, why does …/*…
(i.e. RightComposition
) work? This is due to the special handling of RightComposition
by Query
. From the "Details & Options" section:
- When one or more descending operators are composed with one or more ascending operators (e.g.
desc /* asc
), the descending part will be applied, then subsequent operators will be applied to deeper levels, and lastly the ascending part will be applied to the result. »
This means that Query
recognizes ReverseSortBy[…]/*Select[…]
as composition of two "descending" operators, which are therefore applied before the "ascending" operator. Select[…]@*ReverseSortBy[…]
on the other hand is not recognized in an analogous way. Unfortunately, I don't know why it was implemented this way, I myself have stumbled over this asymmetry several times already.
$endgroup$
@Lee's answer shows how to circumvent the problem by using RightComposition
(/*
) instead of Composition
(@*
), but it does not explain why this works. I will try to explain the "Why" in this answer.
Let's first look at the original example and see how the order is decided. The following is based on the extensive documentation of Query
:
Query
differentiates between two types of operators: "Ascending" and "Descending". First, "descending" operators are applied starting from the outermost one, then "ascending" operators are applied starting from the innermost one:
An "ascending" operator is applied after all subsequent operators have been applied to deeper levels. … »
A "descending" operator is applied to corresponding parts of the original dataset, before subsequent operators are applied at deeper levels. … »
- "Descending" operators include everything that somehow selects parts of the structure (
"key"
,i;;j
,All
,Select[…], …
), or rearranges it (Sort
,SortBy[…]
, …) - Everything else is considered an "ascending" operator. In particular, this includes any unknown operators and custom functions.
With this, we understand why the first example works: As a "descending" operator, ReverseSortBy[…]
is applied before the "ascending" operator StringJoin[…]&
.
In the second case, the first operator is of the form …@*…
or Composition[…,…]
. Since this is not of any of the forms recognized as "descending" operator, both operators are "ascending". This means the inner one is applied first, followed by the outer one.
Now, why does …/*…
(i.e. RightComposition
) work? This is due to the special handling of RightComposition
by Query
. From the "Details & Options" section:
- When one or more descending operators are composed with one or more ascending operators (e.g.
desc /* asc
), the descending part will be applied, then subsequent operators will be applied to deeper levels, and lastly the ascending part will be applied to the result. »
This means that Query
recognizes ReverseSortBy[…]/*Select[…]
as composition of two "descending" operators, which are therefore applied before the "ascending" operator. Select[…]@*ReverseSortBy[…]
on the other hand is not recognized in an analogous way. Unfortunately, I don't know why it was implemented this way, I myself have stumbled over this asymmetry several times already.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
Lukas LangLukas Lang
8,9691 gold badge11 silver badges34 bronze badges
8,9691 gold badge11 silver badges34 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Excellent explanation @Lukas Lang.
$endgroup$
– Lee
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Excellent explanation @Lukas Lang.
$endgroup$
– Lee
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Excellent explanation @Lukas Lang.
$endgroup$
– Lee
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Excellent explanation @Lukas Lang.
$endgroup$
– Lee
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using RightComposition in the expression which fails will produce the result you are looking for:
data =
<;
Query[ReverseSortBy["field 3"] /* Select[#"field 3" > 3 &],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &]@data
You can see the difference between Composition
and RightComposition
by viewing the compiled form of the Query with Normal
:
Query[ReverseSortBy["field 3"] @* Select[#"field 3" > 3 &],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &] // Normal
Query[Select[#"field 3" > 3 &] /* ReverseSortBy["field 3"],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &] // Normal
The first expression fails when applied to data
because the output of Map
is a list of strings, whereas Select
is expecting an Association
with a key of "field 3".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using RightComposition in the expression which fails will produce the result you are looking for:
data =
<;
Query[ReverseSortBy["field 3"] /* Select[#"field 3" > 3 &],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &]@data
You can see the difference between Composition
and RightComposition
by viewing the compiled form of the Query with Normal
:
Query[ReverseSortBy["field 3"] @* Select[#"field 3" > 3 &],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &] // Normal
Query[Select[#"field 3" > 3 &] /* ReverseSortBy["field 3"],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &] // Normal
The first expression fails when applied to data
because the output of Map
is a list of strings, whereas Select
is expecting an Association
with a key of "field 3".
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Using RightComposition in the expression which fails will produce the result you are looking for:
data =
<;
Query[ReverseSortBy["field 3"] /* Select[#"field 3" > 3 &],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &]@data
You can see the difference between Composition
and RightComposition
by viewing the compiled form of the Query with Normal
:
Query[ReverseSortBy["field 3"] @* Select[#"field 3" > 3 &],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &] // Normal
Query[Select[#"field 3" > 3 &] /* ReverseSortBy["field 3"],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &] // Normal
The first expression fails when applied to data
because the output of Map
is a list of strings, whereas Select
is expecting an Association
with a key of "field 3".
$endgroup$
Using RightComposition in the expression which fails will produce the result you are looking for:
data =
<;
Query[ReverseSortBy["field 3"] /* Select[#"field 3" > 3 &],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &]@data
You can see the difference between Composition
and RightComposition
by viewing the compiled form of the Query with Normal
:
Query[ReverseSortBy["field 3"] @* Select[#"field 3" > 3 &],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &] // Normal
Query[Select[#"field 3" > 3 &] /* ReverseSortBy["field 3"],
StringJoin[ToString /@ #"field 1", #"field 2"] &] // Normal
The first expression fails when applied to data
because the output of Map
is a list of strings, whereas Select
is expecting an Association
with a key of "field 3".
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
LeeLee
7092 silver badges8 bronze badges
7092 silver badges8 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204619%2fhow-does-query-decide-the-order-in-which-the-functions-are-applied%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
similar: Struggling to understand Query.
$endgroup$
– WReach
2 hours ago