If water is incompressible, how can sound propagate underwater?Is the speed of sound almost as high as the speed of light in neutron stars?How can sound waves propagate through air?Wave propagation in an incompressible flowCan someone explain how water from a garden hose can propagate in a sine/cosine wave?Why should fluids be confined for Pascal's Law to be applicableThe Mysterious Reverb in a Jar of Hair GelUsing sinusoids to represent sound wavesHow does underwater sound sound?Breaking the sound barrier underwaterHow does sound propagate up a tall building?

Compactness Theorem- Why not Counterexample?

What is the fastest way to do Array Table Lookup with an Integer Index?

Cheap antenna for new HF HAM

How does one calculate the distribution of the Matt Colville way of rolling stats?

Escape the labyrinth!

Can the U.S. president make military decisions without consulting anyone?

I feel like most of my characters are the same, what can I do?

Is it true that, "just ten trading days represent 63 per cent of the returns of the past 50 years"?

Wired to Wireless Doorbell

What can a pilot do if an air traffic controller is incapacitated?

Repeat elements in list, but the number of times each element is repeated is provided by a separate list

How use custom order in folder on Windows 7 and 10

Can multiple wall timers turn lights on or off when required?

How do I improve in sight reading?

GitHub repo with Apache License version 2 in package.json, but no full license copy nor comment headers

How do I extract code from an arduino?

Hilbert's hotel, why can't I repeat it infinitely many times?

Social leper versus social leopard

Debussy as term for bathroom?

use of the disk command

Writing a letter of recommendation for a mediocre student

How to make interviewee comfortable interviewing in lounge chairs

Is there any actual security benefit to restricting foreign IPs?

What was an "insurance cover"?



If water is incompressible, how can sound propagate underwater?


Is the speed of sound almost as high as the speed of light in neutron stars?How can sound waves propagate through air?Wave propagation in an incompressible flowCan someone explain how water from a garden hose can propagate in a sine/cosine wave?Why should fluids be confined for Pascal's Law to be applicableThe Mysterious Reverb in a Jar of Hair GelUsing sinusoids to represent sound wavesHow does underwater sound sound?Breaking the sound barrier underwaterHow does sound propagate up a tall building?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








51












$begingroup$


Since sound travels as longitudinal waves, sound waves should only be able to propagate in a medium through compressions and rarefactions. However, water, as a liquid, is generally treated as an incompressible fluid. Since compression is essential to sound propagation, how do phenomena such as whale calls and underwater speakers work?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Saurav Sumughan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$









  • 11




    $begingroup$
    Interesting side note: the sound waves inside a neutron star travel through the superfluid medium at appreciable fractions of c due to the incredibly dense (and already-compressed) nature of it. Easy to read chart and there's some math on 882.
    $endgroup$
    – Draco18s
    2 days ago







  • 64




    $begingroup$
    generally treated as usually means it isn't
    $endgroup$
    – OrangeDog
    2 days ago






  • 9




    $begingroup$
    You could also ask how sound propagates through solids, and why it seems (at least from my observation) to propagate faster in harder materials.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    2 days ago






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    Please note you could also reverse the argument: assuming incompressibility makes it impossible to explain the existence of sound transmission in water. So incompressibility is the wrong assumption for the given evidence.
    $endgroup$
    – XavierStuvw
    2 days ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Wait until you learn about sound propagation in solids
    $endgroup$
    – slebetman
    2 days ago

















51












$begingroup$


Since sound travels as longitudinal waves, sound waves should only be able to propagate in a medium through compressions and rarefactions. However, water, as a liquid, is generally treated as an incompressible fluid. Since compression is essential to sound propagation, how do phenomena such as whale calls and underwater speakers work?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Saurav Sumughan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$









  • 11




    $begingroup$
    Interesting side note: the sound waves inside a neutron star travel through the superfluid medium at appreciable fractions of c due to the incredibly dense (and already-compressed) nature of it. Easy to read chart and there's some math on 882.
    $endgroup$
    – Draco18s
    2 days ago







  • 64




    $begingroup$
    generally treated as usually means it isn't
    $endgroup$
    – OrangeDog
    2 days ago






  • 9




    $begingroup$
    You could also ask how sound propagates through solids, and why it seems (at least from my observation) to propagate faster in harder materials.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    2 days ago






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    Please note you could also reverse the argument: assuming incompressibility makes it impossible to explain the existence of sound transmission in water. So incompressibility is the wrong assumption for the given evidence.
    $endgroup$
    – XavierStuvw
    2 days ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Wait until you learn about sound propagation in solids
    $endgroup$
    – slebetman
    2 days ago













51












51








51


7



$begingroup$


Since sound travels as longitudinal waves, sound waves should only be able to propagate in a medium through compressions and rarefactions. However, water, as a liquid, is generally treated as an incompressible fluid. Since compression is essential to sound propagation, how do phenomena such as whale calls and underwater speakers work?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Saurav Sumughan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




Since sound travels as longitudinal waves, sound waves should only be able to propagate in a medium through compressions and rarefactions. However, water, as a liquid, is generally treated as an incompressible fluid. Since compression is essential to sound propagation, how do phenomena such as whale calls and underwater speakers work?







fluid-dynamics waves pressure acoustics






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Saurav Sumughan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Saurav Sumughan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 48 mins ago









knzhou

55.9k14 gold badges159 silver badges269 bronze badges




55.9k14 gold badges159 silver badges269 bronze badges






New contributor



Saurav Sumughan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked Sep 15 at 22:22









Saurav SumughanSaurav Sumughan

3732 silver badges6 bronze badges




3732 silver badges6 bronze badges




New contributor



Saurav Sumughan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Saurav Sumughan is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 11




    $begingroup$
    Interesting side note: the sound waves inside a neutron star travel through the superfluid medium at appreciable fractions of c due to the incredibly dense (and already-compressed) nature of it. Easy to read chart and there's some math on 882.
    $endgroup$
    – Draco18s
    2 days ago







  • 64




    $begingroup$
    generally treated as usually means it isn't
    $endgroup$
    – OrangeDog
    2 days ago






  • 9




    $begingroup$
    You could also ask how sound propagates through solids, and why it seems (at least from my observation) to propagate faster in harder materials.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    2 days ago






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    Please note you could also reverse the argument: assuming incompressibility makes it impossible to explain the existence of sound transmission in water. So incompressibility is the wrong assumption for the given evidence.
    $endgroup$
    – XavierStuvw
    2 days ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Wait until you learn about sound propagation in solids
    $endgroup$
    – slebetman
    2 days ago












  • 11




    $begingroup$
    Interesting side note: the sound waves inside a neutron star travel through the superfluid medium at appreciable fractions of c due to the incredibly dense (and already-compressed) nature of it. Easy to read chart and there's some math on 882.
    $endgroup$
    – Draco18s
    2 days ago







  • 64




    $begingroup$
    generally treated as usually means it isn't
    $endgroup$
    – OrangeDog
    2 days ago






  • 9




    $begingroup$
    You could also ask how sound propagates through solids, and why it seems (at least from my observation) to propagate faster in harder materials.
    $endgroup$
    – jamesqf
    2 days ago






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    Please note you could also reverse the argument: assuming incompressibility makes it impossible to explain the existence of sound transmission in water. So incompressibility is the wrong assumption for the given evidence.
    $endgroup$
    – XavierStuvw
    2 days ago






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Wait until you learn about sound propagation in solids
    $endgroup$
    – slebetman
    2 days ago







11




11




$begingroup$
Interesting side note: the sound waves inside a neutron star travel through the superfluid medium at appreciable fractions of c due to the incredibly dense (and already-compressed) nature of it. Easy to read chart and there's some math on 882.
$endgroup$
– Draco18s
2 days ago





$begingroup$
Interesting side note: the sound waves inside a neutron star travel through the superfluid medium at appreciable fractions of c due to the incredibly dense (and already-compressed) nature of it. Easy to read chart and there's some math on 882.
$endgroup$
– Draco18s
2 days ago





64




64




$begingroup$
generally treated as usually means it isn't
$endgroup$
– OrangeDog
2 days ago




$begingroup$
generally treated as usually means it isn't
$endgroup$
– OrangeDog
2 days ago




9




9




$begingroup$
You could also ask how sound propagates through solids, and why it seems (at least from my observation) to propagate faster in harder materials.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
2 days ago




$begingroup$
You could also ask how sound propagates through solids, and why it seems (at least from my observation) to propagate faster in harder materials.
$endgroup$
– jamesqf
2 days ago




11




11




$begingroup$
Please note you could also reverse the argument: assuming incompressibility makes it impossible to explain the existence of sound transmission in water. So incompressibility is the wrong assumption for the given evidence.
$endgroup$
– XavierStuvw
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Please note you could also reverse the argument: assuming incompressibility makes it impossible to explain the existence of sound transmission in water. So incompressibility is the wrong assumption for the given evidence.
$endgroup$
– XavierStuvw
2 days ago




5




5




$begingroup$
Wait until you learn about sound propagation in solids
$endgroup$
– slebetman
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Wait until you learn about sound propagation in solids
$endgroup$
– slebetman
2 days ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















112














$begingroup$

Water is compressible (nothing can be completely incompressible). Treating water as incompressible is just a (usually very good) approximation. Therefore, longitudinal waves are possible.



Wikipedia reports the bulk modulus to be about $2.2 mathrmGPa$. This puts the speed of sound in water at about
$$v=sqrtfracbetarho=sqrtfrac2.2 mathrmGPa1000 mathrmkg/m^3approx1500 mathrmm/s$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 58




    $begingroup$
    For comparison's sake, the speed of sound in normal Earth air is around 343 meters per second.
    $endgroup$
    – Nzall
    2 days ago







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @Nzall So it travels faster in water?
    $endgroup$
    – Cloud
    yesterday






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    @Cloud Yes, it does
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    It travels faster which might be related to it not dispersing as much, making it a much more effective tool for echo location in that environment. On the other hand, light doesn't travel so well underwater as it does on land. This might account for more underwater creatures investing in echo location over sight when compared to land ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Rohit Pandey
    8 mins ago










  • $begingroup$
    @AaronStevens - "nothing can be completely incompressible" what about black holes?
    $endgroup$
    – Rohit Pandey
    6 mins ago


















54














$begingroup$

If for your purposes of your task you can treat water as uncompressible, then you can also assume that sound propagates instantly in it. Indeed there will be no sound waves in this case, the movement will be just propagated instantly from source to the observer.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$










  • 32




    $begingroup$
    Right. In somewhat less infinity-suspicious terms, the wavelength will be much larger than the size of the system you consider.
    $endgroup$
    – leftaroundabout
    2 days ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    So is the maximum theoretical density of matter that where the speed of sound equals the speed of light in a vacuum?
    $endgroup$
    – DrMcCleod
    2 days ago






  • 18




    $begingroup$
    @DrMcCleod It's not about matter density, it's about compressibility. But it doesn't matter much in practice, since long before you reach those, the simplified models we usually use (like bulk modulus) no longer work anyway. But we did "observe" sound moving through neutron stars, and even there, we expect the speed of sound to be about 60% of the speed of light (physics.stackexchange.com/a/54786/40441). Not much denser after that, you get a black hole, so the real limit is probably not much higher than that (assuming the sound spreads due to electromagnetism, of course).
    $endgroup$
    – Luaan
    2 days ago


















13














$begingroup$


Since sound travels as longitudinal waves, sound waves should only be able to propagate in a medium through compressions and rarefactions. However, water, as a liquid, is generally treated as an incompressible fluid.




The underwater environment is characterized as an inhomogeneous medium, such inhomogeneity is due to point-to-point changes in underwater characteristics such as temperature, salinity, and pressure (depth), and other factors (see below). Such variation of sound speeds along the propagation path of acoustic signals causes refraction and often yields a continuous change in the gazing angle of a propagating signal.



Early experiments with water compressibility have been recorded almost 260 years ago, see: J. Canton, "Experiments to prove that water is not incompressible", journal_cover Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 52 (1761) 640-643. (Archive.org).



Visit the London South Bank University webpage: "Explanation of the Density Anomalies of Water", section: "D13   Water has an unusually low compressibility (0.46 GPa$underline^-1$, compare CCl4 1.05 GPa$underline^-1$, at 25 °C) $underline^[f]$", on their "Water Structure and Science" website for more than you could ever want to know about water:



[f] Others take a contrary view, stating that water's compressibility is twice that expected [53b]. This difference is down to the viewpoint and different theoretical expectations. In both cases, water's compressibility is unexpected; either being greater than expected due to water's open structure or less than expected (in spite of its open structure) due to the cohesive nature of its extensive hydrogen-bonding.

[53 a-b] (a) H. E. Stanley, S. V. Budyrev, M. Canpolat, M. Meyer, O. Mishima, M. R. Sadr-Lahijany, A. Scala and F. W. Starr, The puzzling statistical physics of liquid water, Physica A 257 (1998) 213-232. (b) H. E. Stanley, P. Kumar, L. Xu, Z. Yan, M. G. Mazza, S. V. Buldyrev, S.-H. Chen and F. Mallamace, The puzzling unsolved mysteries of liquid water: Some recent progress, Physica A 386 (2007) 729-743.




"Although commonly erroneously thought to be incompressible, water has been understood to be compressible for over 250 years. It may be considered that water should have a high isothermal compressibility ($beta_T$) and adiabatic compressibility ($beta_S$), as the large cavities in liquid water allows plenty of scope for the water structure to collapse under pressure without water molecules approaching close enough to repel each other.



$beta_T = - left [ frac partial Vpartial P right ]_T times frac 1V = left [ frac partial rhopartial P right ]_T times frac 1rho = left [ frac partial L n rhopartial L n P right ]_T = - left [ frac partial ^2 Gpartial P^2 right ]_T times frac 1V = frac left< middle ( delta V middle)^2 right>k_BTV
$



$beta_S = - left [ frac partial Vpartial P right ]_S times frac 1V = - left [ frac partial ^2 Hpartial P^2 right ]_S times frac 1V$



$left ( frac partial alpha _Ppartial P right )_T = - left ( frac partial beta _Tpartial T right )_P
$



where $beta_T, beta_S, alpha _P, k_B, P, T, N, rho, V, H$ and $S$ are the isothermal compressibility, adiabatic compressibility, thermal expansion, Boltzmann constant, pressure, temperature, number of molecules, density, volume, enthalpy and entropy respectively; the $left< , , right>$ brackets indicate the fluctuations in the values about their mean values.



The compressibility at constant temperature ($beta_T$) of water depends on fluctuations in its density. In 'normal' liquids, these fluctuations are expected to reduce with thermal motions as the liquid cools down. This is not the case for water below 46.5 °C (see below).



The deformation causes the growth in the radial distribution function peak at about 3.5 Å with increasing or pressure (and temperature), due to the collapsing structure. The low compressibility of water is due to water's high-density, again due to the cohesive nature of the extensive hydrogen-bonding. This reduces the free space (compared with other liquids) to a greater extent than the contained cavities increase it.




The speed and direction of sound in water and rock is far more complicated than the propagation of sound in ground level air. Propagation of sound is permitted by non-zero stiffness and lack of vacuum (a medium to transmit the sound). Even a steel rod will transfer sound.



As explained on the HyperPhysics website the speed of sound in gases, liquids, and solids is predictable from their density and elastic properties of the media (bulk modulus). In water it's 1482 m/s at 20°C.



Sound in liquids also travels as longitudinal waves, it is only in solids that traverse waves propagate. The manner in which sound propagates in liquids varies mostly due to depth, other minor factors are explained in detail below.



In shallow water reflections from the surface and bed play a role. When the sound source and receiver are located at the depth of the sound speed minimum, called the SOFAR or sound channel axis, some sound waves travel nearly straight, cycling above and below the axis, others almost reaching both the surface and bottom. At SOFAR depths sound waves traveling from the source at angles of less than about 12° are refracted back toward the sound speed minimum before ever reaching the surface or sea floor. Low frequency sounds are attenuated the least while high frequency sounds are most greatly attenuated in the SOFAR channel.



Sound traveling closest to the axis travels the shortest distance but at the slowest speed while sounds slightly off axis travel a curved path at a higher speed. This leads to explosions sounding like a series of bumps that get louder and louder as each path arrives at its destination.



In underwater acoustics, speed of sound depends on pressure (hence depth), temperature, suspended or dissolved contents, and salinity of seawater, thus leading to vertical speed gradients similar to those that exist in atmospheric acoustics. Sound may be absorbed by losses at the fluid boundaries. Near the surface of the sea losses can occur in a bubble layer or in ice, while at the bottom sound can penetrate into the sediment and be absorbed.




Sound speed

Approximate values for fresh water and seawater, respectively, at atmospheric pressure are 1450 and 1500 m/s for the sound speed, and 1000 and 1030 kg/m³ for the density. The speed of sound in water increases with increasing pressure, temperature and salinity. The maximum speed in pure water under atmospheric pressure is attained at about 74 °C; sound travels slower in hotter water after that point; the maximum increases with pressure. On-line calculators can be found at Technical Guides – Speed of Sound in Sea-Water and Technical Guides – Speed of Sound in Pure Water. Those webpages offer simplified and more complicated estimates of the speed of sound underwater.







Propagation of sound

Underwater acoustic propagation depends on many factors. The direction of sound propagation is determined by the sound speed gradients in the water. This is an important thing that happens in water, because the speed of sound travel in water with velocity regular. In the sea the vertical gradients are generally much larger than the horizontal ones. Combining this with a tendency towards increasing sound speed at increasing depth, due to the increasing pressure in the deep sea, causes a reversal of the sound speed gradient in the thermocline, creating an efficient waveguide at the depth, corresponding to the minimum sound speed. The sound speed profile may cause regions of low sound intensity called "Shadow Zones", and regions of high intensity called "Caustics". These may be found by ray tracing methods.



At equator and temperate latitudes in the ocean, the surface temperature is high enough to reverse the pressure effect, such that a sound speed minimum occurs at depth of a few hundred metres. The presence of this minimum creates a special channel known as Deep Sound Channel, previously known as the SOFAR (sound fixing and ranging) channel, permitting guided propagation of underwater sound for thousands of kilometres without interaction with the sea surface or the seabed. Another phenomenon in the deep sea is the formation of sound focusing areas, known as Convergence Zones. In this case sound is refracted downward from a near-surface source and then back up again. The horizontal distance from the source at which this occurs depends on the positive and negative sound speed gradients. A surface duct can also occur in both deep and moderately shallow water when there is upward refraction, for example due to cold surface temperatures. Propagation is by repeated sound bounces off the surface.




Wikipedia's webpage on the speed of sound, section: "High-precision measurements in air", lists the speed of sound in air as "... at 0 °C. The result was 331.45 ± 0.01 m/s for dry air at STP, for frequencies from 93 Hz to 1,500 Hz.".



Wikipedia lists the speed of sound in freshwater as "1481 m/s at 20 °C" but in seawater the calculations become more complex due to temperature and pressure resulting in a sound speed profile (SSP).



Here is an example SSP at a location north of Hawaii:



SSP example



Propagation of sound in solids, such as rock, are subject to volumetric deformations (compression) and shear deformations (shearing) called pressure waves (longitudinal waves) and shear waves (transverse waves), respectively.




In earthquakes, the corresponding seismic waves are called P-waves (primary waves) and S-waves (secondary waves), respectively. The sound velocities of these two types of waves propagating in a homogeneous 3-dimensional solid are respectively given by



$$c_mathrm solid,p =sqrt frac K+frac 43Grho =sqrt frac E(1-nu )rho (1+nu )(1-2nu ),$$



$$c_mathrm solid,s =sqrt frac Grho ,$$



where



$K$ is the bulk modulus of the elastic materials;
$G$ is the shear modulus of the elastic materials;
$E$ is the Young's modulus;
$ρ$ is the density;
$ν$ is Poisson's ratio.



The last quantity is not an independent one, as $E = 3K(1 − 2ν)$. Note that the speed of pressure waves depends both on the pressure and shear resistance properties of the material, while the speed of shear waves depends on the shear properties only.



Typically, pressure waves travel faster in materials than do shear waves, and in earthquakes this is the reason that the onset of an earthquake is often preceded by a quick upward-downward shock, before arrival of waves that produce a side-to-side motion.




Similar to seawater the propagation of sound within the Earth isn't a simple formula:



SSP in Earth



Typical speeds of sound are 330 m/s in air, 1450 m/s in water, but are about 5000 m/s in granite for p-waves; s-waves travel approximately 60% of the speed of their accompanying p-wave. S-waves can not travel through liquids, that includes the Earth's core.




Since compression is essential to sound propogation, how do phenomena such as whale calls and underwater speakers work?




Water is compressible. The propagation of sound is possible in gases, liquids and solids.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$






















    1














    $begingroup$

    Well basically the incompressibility of the water is just an approximation. You can always compress the water molecules; in fact, let's show how the phenomenon of propagation happens.



    We know that compression of the molecules by giving them a potential energy, so if we make them vibrate this will create a difference of pressure. The energy will be transferred to the other molecules, and thus the sound wave will propagate through the medium depending on the nature of the medium. If it is a gas the velocity of propagation will be less since the molecules are farther from each other than in liquids. The speed of sound in water will be much higher because the molecules now are closer together, so the transfer of the energy and vibration will be faster than in the air.



    That's why when you drown your head into the water you can never localize a sound source. The sound wave will hit your ears at the same time due to the speed of propagation $Vapprox 1500 mathrmm/s$






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor



    user212525 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





    $endgroup$










    • 4




      $begingroup$
      I have edited your question this time, but please make sure to make your answer readable. Use punctuation to separate your sentences. Also, please make sure to use full words (nothing like "cuz" instead of "because". It is also helpful to separate your answer into paragraphs rather than just posting a wall of text.
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      2 days ago











    protected by AccidentalFourierTransform 2 days ago



    Thank you for your interest in this question.
    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    112














    $begingroup$

    Water is compressible (nothing can be completely incompressible). Treating water as incompressible is just a (usually very good) approximation. Therefore, longitudinal waves are possible.



    Wikipedia reports the bulk modulus to be about $2.2 mathrmGPa$. This puts the speed of sound in water at about
    $$v=sqrtfracbetarho=sqrtfrac2.2 mathrmGPa1000 mathrmkg/m^3approx1500 mathrmm/s$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 58




      $begingroup$
      For comparison's sake, the speed of sound in normal Earth air is around 343 meters per second.
      $endgroup$
      – Nzall
      2 days ago







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Nzall So it travels faster in water?
      $endgroup$
      – Cloud
      yesterday






    • 8




      $begingroup$
      @Cloud Yes, it does
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      It travels faster which might be related to it not dispersing as much, making it a much more effective tool for echo location in that environment. On the other hand, light doesn't travel so well underwater as it does on land. This might account for more underwater creatures investing in echo location over sight when compared to land ones.
      $endgroup$
      – Rohit Pandey
      8 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AaronStevens - "nothing can be completely incompressible" what about black holes?
      $endgroup$
      – Rohit Pandey
      6 mins ago















    112














    $begingroup$

    Water is compressible (nothing can be completely incompressible). Treating water as incompressible is just a (usually very good) approximation. Therefore, longitudinal waves are possible.



    Wikipedia reports the bulk modulus to be about $2.2 mathrmGPa$. This puts the speed of sound in water at about
    $$v=sqrtfracbetarho=sqrtfrac2.2 mathrmGPa1000 mathrmkg/m^3approx1500 mathrmm/s$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 58




      $begingroup$
      For comparison's sake, the speed of sound in normal Earth air is around 343 meters per second.
      $endgroup$
      – Nzall
      2 days ago







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Nzall So it travels faster in water?
      $endgroup$
      – Cloud
      yesterday






    • 8




      $begingroup$
      @Cloud Yes, it does
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      It travels faster which might be related to it not dispersing as much, making it a much more effective tool for echo location in that environment. On the other hand, light doesn't travel so well underwater as it does on land. This might account for more underwater creatures investing in echo location over sight when compared to land ones.
      $endgroup$
      – Rohit Pandey
      8 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AaronStevens - "nothing can be completely incompressible" what about black holes?
      $endgroup$
      – Rohit Pandey
      6 mins ago













    112














    112










    112







    $begingroup$

    Water is compressible (nothing can be completely incompressible). Treating water as incompressible is just a (usually very good) approximation. Therefore, longitudinal waves are possible.



    Wikipedia reports the bulk modulus to be about $2.2 mathrmGPa$. This puts the speed of sound in water at about
    $$v=sqrtfracbetarho=sqrtfrac2.2 mathrmGPa1000 mathrmkg/m^3approx1500 mathrmm/s$$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Water is compressible (nothing can be completely incompressible). Treating water as incompressible is just a (usually very good) approximation. Therefore, longitudinal waves are possible.



    Wikipedia reports the bulk modulus to be about $2.2 mathrmGPa$. This puts the speed of sound in water at about
    $$v=sqrtfracbetarho=sqrtfrac2.2 mathrmGPa1000 mathrmkg/m^3approx1500 mathrmm/s$$







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Sep 16 at 3:00

























    answered Sep 15 at 22:36









    Aaron StevensAaron Stevens

    23.7k5 gold badges47 silver badges80 bronze badges




    23.7k5 gold badges47 silver badges80 bronze badges










    • 58




      $begingroup$
      For comparison's sake, the speed of sound in normal Earth air is around 343 meters per second.
      $endgroup$
      – Nzall
      2 days ago







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Nzall So it travels faster in water?
      $endgroup$
      – Cloud
      yesterday






    • 8




      $begingroup$
      @Cloud Yes, it does
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      It travels faster which might be related to it not dispersing as much, making it a much more effective tool for echo location in that environment. On the other hand, light doesn't travel so well underwater as it does on land. This might account for more underwater creatures investing in echo location over sight when compared to land ones.
      $endgroup$
      – Rohit Pandey
      8 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AaronStevens - "nothing can be completely incompressible" what about black holes?
      $endgroup$
      – Rohit Pandey
      6 mins ago












    • 58




      $begingroup$
      For comparison's sake, the speed of sound in normal Earth air is around 343 meters per second.
      $endgroup$
      – Nzall
      2 days ago







    • 5




      $begingroup$
      @Nzall So it travels faster in water?
      $endgroup$
      – Cloud
      yesterday






    • 8




      $begingroup$
      @Cloud Yes, it does
      $endgroup$
      – Aaron Stevens
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      It travels faster which might be related to it not dispersing as much, making it a much more effective tool for echo location in that environment. On the other hand, light doesn't travel so well underwater as it does on land. This might account for more underwater creatures investing in echo location over sight when compared to land ones.
      $endgroup$
      – Rohit Pandey
      8 mins ago










    • $begingroup$
      @AaronStevens - "nothing can be completely incompressible" what about black holes?
      $endgroup$
      – Rohit Pandey
      6 mins ago







    58




    58




    $begingroup$
    For comparison's sake, the speed of sound in normal Earth air is around 343 meters per second.
    $endgroup$
    – Nzall
    2 days ago





    $begingroup$
    For comparison's sake, the speed of sound in normal Earth air is around 343 meters per second.
    $endgroup$
    – Nzall
    2 days ago





    5




    5




    $begingroup$
    @Nzall So it travels faster in water?
    $endgroup$
    – Cloud
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @Nzall So it travels faster in water?
    $endgroup$
    – Cloud
    yesterday




    8




    8




    $begingroup$
    @Cloud Yes, it does
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @Cloud Yes, it does
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    It travels faster which might be related to it not dispersing as much, making it a much more effective tool for echo location in that environment. On the other hand, light doesn't travel so well underwater as it does on land. This might account for more underwater creatures investing in echo location over sight when compared to land ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Rohit Pandey
    8 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    It travels faster which might be related to it not dispersing as much, making it a much more effective tool for echo location in that environment. On the other hand, light doesn't travel so well underwater as it does on land. This might account for more underwater creatures investing in echo location over sight when compared to land ones.
    $endgroup$
    – Rohit Pandey
    8 mins ago












    $begingroup$
    @AaronStevens - "nothing can be completely incompressible" what about black holes?
    $endgroup$
    – Rohit Pandey
    6 mins ago




    $begingroup$
    @AaronStevens - "nothing can be completely incompressible" what about black holes?
    $endgroup$
    – Rohit Pandey
    6 mins ago













    54














    $begingroup$

    If for your purposes of your task you can treat water as uncompressible, then you can also assume that sound propagates instantly in it. Indeed there will be no sound waves in this case, the movement will be just propagated instantly from source to the observer.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 32




      $begingroup$
      Right. In somewhat less infinity-suspicious terms, the wavelength will be much larger than the size of the system you consider.
      $endgroup$
      – leftaroundabout
      2 days ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      So is the maximum theoretical density of matter that where the speed of sound equals the speed of light in a vacuum?
      $endgroup$
      – DrMcCleod
      2 days ago






    • 18




      $begingroup$
      @DrMcCleod It's not about matter density, it's about compressibility. But it doesn't matter much in practice, since long before you reach those, the simplified models we usually use (like bulk modulus) no longer work anyway. But we did "observe" sound moving through neutron stars, and even there, we expect the speed of sound to be about 60% of the speed of light (physics.stackexchange.com/a/54786/40441). Not much denser after that, you get a black hole, so the real limit is probably not much higher than that (assuming the sound spreads due to electromagnetism, of course).
      $endgroup$
      – Luaan
      2 days ago















    54














    $begingroup$

    If for your purposes of your task you can treat water as uncompressible, then you can also assume that sound propagates instantly in it. Indeed there will be no sound waves in this case, the movement will be just propagated instantly from source to the observer.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 32




      $begingroup$
      Right. In somewhat less infinity-suspicious terms, the wavelength will be much larger than the size of the system you consider.
      $endgroup$
      – leftaroundabout
      2 days ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      So is the maximum theoretical density of matter that where the speed of sound equals the speed of light in a vacuum?
      $endgroup$
      – DrMcCleod
      2 days ago






    • 18




      $begingroup$
      @DrMcCleod It's not about matter density, it's about compressibility. But it doesn't matter much in practice, since long before you reach those, the simplified models we usually use (like bulk modulus) no longer work anyway. But we did "observe" sound moving through neutron stars, and even there, we expect the speed of sound to be about 60% of the speed of light (physics.stackexchange.com/a/54786/40441). Not much denser after that, you get a black hole, so the real limit is probably not much higher than that (assuming the sound spreads due to electromagnetism, of course).
      $endgroup$
      – Luaan
      2 days ago













    54














    54










    54







    $begingroup$

    If for your purposes of your task you can treat water as uncompressible, then you can also assume that sound propagates instantly in it. Indeed there will be no sound waves in this case, the movement will be just propagated instantly from source to the observer.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    If for your purposes of your task you can treat water as uncompressible, then you can also assume that sound propagates instantly in it. Indeed there will be no sound waves in this case, the movement will be just propagated instantly from source to the observer.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago









    Aaron Stevens

    23.7k5 gold badges47 silver badges80 bronze badges




    23.7k5 gold badges47 silver badges80 bronze badges










    answered 2 days ago









    Dmitry GrigoryevDmitry Grigoryev

    3,7381 gold badge9 silver badges27 bronze badges




    3,7381 gold badge9 silver badges27 bronze badges










    • 32




      $begingroup$
      Right. In somewhat less infinity-suspicious terms, the wavelength will be much larger than the size of the system you consider.
      $endgroup$
      – leftaroundabout
      2 days ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      So is the maximum theoretical density of matter that where the speed of sound equals the speed of light in a vacuum?
      $endgroup$
      – DrMcCleod
      2 days ago






    • 18




      $begingroup$
      @DrMcCleod It's not about matter density, it's about compressibility. But it doesn't matter much in practice, since long before you reach those, the simplified models we usually use (like bulk modulus) no longer work anyway. But we did "observe" sound moving through neutron stars, and even there, we expect the speed of sound to be about 60% of the speed of light (physics.stackexchange.com/a/54786/40441). Not much denser after that, you get a black hole, so the real limit is probably not much higher than that (assuming the sound spreads due to electromagnetism, of course).
      $endgroup$
      – Luaan
      2 days ago












    • 32




      $begingroup$
      Right. In somewhat less infinity-suspicious terms, the wavelength will be much larger than the size of the system you consider.
      $endgroup$
      – leftaroundabout
      2 days ago






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      So is the maximum theoretical density of matter that where the speed of sound equals the speed of light in a vacuum?
      $endgroup$
      – DrMcCleod
      2 days ago






    • 18




      $begingroup$
      @DrMcCleod It's not about matter density, it's about compressibility. But it doesn't matter much in practice, since long before you reach those, the simplified models we usually use (like bulk modulus) no longer work anyway. But we did "observe" sound moving through neutron stars, and even there, we expect the speed of sound to be about 60% of the speed of light (physics.stackexchange.com/a/54786/40441). Not much denser after that, you get a black hole, so the real limit is probably not much higher than that (assuming the sound spreads due to electromagnetism, of course).
      $endgroup$
      – Luaan
      2 days ago







    32




    32




    $begingroup$
    Right. In somewhat less infinity-suspicious terms, the wavelength will be much larger than the size of the system you consider.
    $endgroup$
    – leftaroundabout
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    Right. In somewhat less infinity-suspicious terms, the wavelength will be much larger than the size of the system you consider.
    $endgroup$
    – leftaroundabout
    2 days ago




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    So is the maximum theoretical density of matter that where the speed of sound equals the speed of light in a vacuum?
    $endgroup$
    – DrMcCleod
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    So is the maximum theoretical density of matter that where the speed of sound equals the speed of light in a vacuum?
    $endgroup$
    – DrMcCleod
    2 days ago




    18




    18




    $begingroup$
    @DrMcCleod It's not about matter density, it's about compressibility. But it doesn't matter much in practice, since long before you reach those, the simplified models we usually use (like bulk modulus) no longer work anyway. But we did "observe" sound moving through neutron stars, and even there, we expect the speed of sound to be about 60% of the speed of light (physics.stackexchange.com/a/54786/40441). Not much denser after that, you get a black hole, so the real limit is probably not much higher than that (assuming the sound spreads due to electromagnetism, of course).
    $endgroup$
    – Luaan
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    @DrMcCleod It's not about matter density, it's about compressibility. But it doesn't matter much in practice, since long before you reach those, the simplified models we usually use (like bulk modulus) no longer work anyway. But we did "observe" sound moving through neutron stars, and even there, we expect the speed of sound to be about 60% of the speed of light (physics.stackexchange.com/a/54786/40441). Not much denser after that, you get a black hole, so the real limit is probably not much higher than that (assuming the sound spreads due to electromagnetism, of course).
    $endgroup$
    – Luaan
    2 days ago











    13














    $begingroup$


    Since sound travels as longitudinal waves, sound waves should only be able to propagate in a medium through compressions and rarefactions. However, water, as a liquid, is generally treated as an incompressible fluid.




    The underwater environment is characterized as an inhomogeneous medium, such inhomogeneity is due to point-to-point changes in underwater characteristics such as temperature, salinity, and pressure (depth), and other factors (see below). Such variation of sound speeds along the propagation path of acoustic signals causes refraction and often yields a continuous change in the gazing angle of a propagating signal.



    Early experiments with water compressibility have been recorded almost 260 years ago, see: J. Canton, "Experiments to prove that water is not incompressible", journal_cover Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 52 (1761) 640-643. (Archive.org).



    Visit the London South Bank University webpage: "Explanation of the Density Anomalies of Water", section: "D13   Water has an unusually low compressibility (0.46 GPa$underline^-1$, compare CCl4 1.05 GPa$underline^-1$, at 25 °C) $underline^[f]$", on their "Water Structure and Science" website for more than you could ever want to know about water:



    [f] Others take a contrary view, stating that water's compressibility is twice that expected [53b]. This difference is down to the viewpoint and different theoretical expectations. In both cases, water's compressibility is unexpected; either being greater than expected due to water's open structure or less than expected (in spite of its open structure) due to the cohesive nature of its extensive hydrogen-bonding.

    [53 a-b] (a) H. E. Stanley, S. V. Budyrev, M. Canpolat, M. Meyer, O. Mishima, M. R. Sadr-Lahijany, A. Scala and F. W. Starr, The puzzling statistical physics of liquid water, Physica A 257 (1998) 213-232. (b) H. E. Stanley, P. Kumar, L. Xu, Z. Yan, M. G. Mazza, S. V. Buldyrev, S.-H. Chen and F. Mallamace, The puzzling unsolved mysteries of liquid water: Some recent progress, Physica A 386 (2007) 729-743.




    "Although commonly erroneously thought to be incompressible, water has been understood to be compressible for over 250 years. It may be considered that water should have a high isothermal compressibility ($beta_T$) and adiabatic compressibility ($beta_S$), as the large cavities in liquid water allows plenty of scope for the water structure to collapse under pressure without water molecules approaching close enough to repel each other.



    $beta_T = - left [ frac partial Vpartial P right ]_T times frac 1V = left [ frac partial rhopartial P right ]_T times frac 1rho = left [ frac partial L n rhopartial L n P right ]_T = - left [ frac partial ^2 Gpartial P^2 right ]_T times frac 1V = frac left< middle ( delta V middle)^2 right>k_BTV
    $



    $beta_S = - left [ frac partial Vpartial P right ]_S times frac 1V = - left [ frac partial ^2 Hpartial P^2 right ]_S times frac 1V$



    $left ( frac partial alpha _Ppartial P right )_T = - left ( frac partial beta _Tpartial T right )_P
    $



    where $beta_T, beta_S, alpha _P, k_B, P, T, N, rho, V, H$ and $S$ are the isothermal compressibility, adiabatic compressibility, thermal expansion, Boltzmann constant, pressure, temperature, number of molecules, density, volume, enthalpy and entropy respectively; the $left< , , right>$ brackets indicate the fluctuations in the values about their mean values.



    The compressibility at constant temperature ($beta_T$) of water depends on fluctuations in its density. In 'normal' liquids, these fluctuations are expected to reduce with thermal motions as the liquid cools down. This is not the case for water below 46.5 °C (see below).



    The deformation causes the growth in the radial distribution function peak at about 3.5 Å with increasing or pressure (and temperature), due to the collapsing structure. The low compressibility of water is due to water's high-density, again due to the cohesive nature of the extensive hydrogen-bonding. This reduces the free space (compared with other liquids) to a greater extent than the contained cavities increase it.




    The speed and direction of sound in water and rock is far more complicated than the propagation of sound in ground level air. Propagation of sound is permitted by non-zero stiffness and lack of vacuum (a medium to transmit the sound). Even a steel rod will transfer sound.



    As explained on the HyperPhysics website the speed of sound in gases, liquids, and solids is predictable from their density and elastic properties of the media (bulk modulus). In water it's 1482 m/s at 20°C.



    Sound in liquids also travels as longitudinal waves, it is only in solids that traverse waves propagate. The manner in which sound propagates in liquids varies mostly due to depth, other minor factors are explained in detail below.



    In shallow water reflections from the surface and bed play a role. When the sound source and receiver are located at the depth of the sound speed minimum, called the SOFAR or sound channel axis, some sound waves travel nearly straight, cycling above and below the axis, others almost reaching both the surface and bottom. At SOFAR depths sound waves traveling from the source at angles of less than about 12° are refracted back toward the sound speed minimum before ever reaching the surface or sea floor. Low frequency sounds are attenuated the least while high frequency sounds are most greatly attenuated in the SOFAR channel.



    Sound traveling closest to the axis travels the shortest distance but at the slowest speed while sounds slightly off axis travel a curved path at a higher speed. This leads to explosions sounding like a series of bumps that get louder and louder as each path arrives at its destination.



    In underwater acoustics, speed of sound depends on pressure (hence depth), temperature, suspended or dissolved contents, and salinity of seawater, thus leading to vertical speed gradients similar to those that exist in atmospheric acoustics. Sound may be absorbed by losses at the fluid boundaries. Near the surface of the sea losses can occur in a bubble layer or in ice, while at the bottom sound can penetrate into the sediment and be absorbed.




    Sound speed

    Approximate values for fresh water and seawater, respectively, at atmospheric pressure are 1450 and 1500 m/s for the sound speed, and 1000 and 1030 kg/m³ for the density. The speed of sound in water increases with increasing pressure, temperature and salinity. The maximum speed in pure water under atmospheric pressure is attained at about 74 °C; sound travels slower in hotter water after that point; the maximum increases with pressure. On-line calculators can be found at Technical Guides – Speed of Sound in Sea-Water and Technical Guides – Speed of Sound in Pure Water. Those webpages offer simplified and more complicated estimates of the speed of sound underwater.







    Propagation of sound

    Underwater acoustic propagation depends on many factors. The direction of sound propagation is determined by the sound speed gradients in the water. This is an important thing that happens in water, because the speed of sound travel in water with velocity regular. In the sea the vertical gradients are generally much larger than the horizontal ones. Combining this with a tendency towards increasing sound speed at increasing depth, due to the increasing pressure in the deep sea, causes a reversal of the sound speed gradient in the thermocline, creating an efficient waveguide at the depth, corresponding to the minimum sound speed. The sound speed profile may cause regions of low sound intensity called "Shadow Zones", and regions of high intensity called "Caustics". These may be found by ray tracing methods.



    At equator and temperate latitudes in the ocean, the surface temperature is high enough to reverse the pressure effect, such that a sound speed minimum occurs at depth of a few hundred metres. The presence of this minimum creates a special channel known as Deep Sound Channel, previously known as the SOFAR (sound fixing and ranging) channel, permitting guided propagation of underwater sound for thousands of kilometres without interaction with the sea surface or the seabed. Another phenomenon in the deep sea is the formation of sound focusing areas, known as Convergence Zones. In this case sound is refracted downward from a near-surface source and then back up again. The horizontal distance from the source at which this occurs depends on the positive and negative sound speed gradients. A surface duct can also occur in both deep and moderately shallow water when there is upward refraction, for example due to cold surface temperatures. Propagation is by repeated sound bounces off the surface.




    Wikipedia's webpage on the speed of sound, section: "High-precision measurements in air", lists the speed of sound in air as "... at 0 °C. The result was 331.45 ± 0.01 m/s for dry air at STP, for frequencies from 93 Hz to 1,500 Hz.".



    Wikipedia lists the speed of sound in freshwater as "1481 m/s at 20 °C" but in seawater the calculations become more complex due to temperature and pressure resulting in a sound speed profile (SSP).



    Here is an example SSP at a location north of Hawaii:



    SSP example



    Propagation of sound in solids, such as rock, are subject to volumetric deformations (compression) and shear deformations (shearing) called pressure waves (longitudinal waves) and shear waves (transverse waves), respectively.




    In earthquakes, the corresponding seismic waves are called P-waves (primary waves) and S-waves (secondary waves), respectively. The sound velocities of these two types of waves propagating in a homogeneous 3-dimensional solid are respectively given by



    $$c_mathrm solid,p =sqrt frac K+frac 43Grho =sqrt frac E(1-nu )rho (1+nu )(1-2nu ),$$



    $$c_mathrm solid,s =sqrt frac Grho ,$$



    where



    $K$ is the bulk modulus of the elastic materials;
    $G$ is the shear modulus of the elastic materials;
    $E$ is the Young's modulus;
    $ρ$ is the density;
    $ν$ is Poisson's ratio.



    The last quantity is not an independent one, as $E = 3K(1 − 2ν)$. Note that the speed of pressure waves depends both on the pressure and shear resistance properties of the material, while the speed of shear waves depends on the shear properties only.



    Typically, pressure waves travel faster in materials than do shear waves, and in earthquakes this is the reason that the onset of an earthquake is often preceded by a quick upward-downward shock, before arrival of waves that produce a side-to-side motion.




    Similar to seawater the propagation of sound within the Earth isn't a simple formula:



    SSP in Earth



    Typical speeds of sound are 330 m/s in air, 1450 m/s in water, but are about 5000 m/s in granite for p-waves; s-waves travel approximately 60% of the speed of their accompanying p-wave. S-waves can not travel through liquids, that includes the Earth's core.




    Since compression is essential to sound propogation, how do phenomena such as whale calls and underwater speakers work?




    Water is compressible. The propagation of sound is possible in gases, liquids and solids.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



















      13














      $begingroup$


      Since sound travels as longitudinal waves, sound waves should only be able to propagate in a medium through compressions and rarefactions. However, water, as a liquid, is generally treated as an incompressible fluid.




      The underwater environment is characterized as an inhomogeneous medium, such inhomogeneity is due to point-to-point changes in underwater characteristics such as temperature, salinity, and pressure (depth), and other factors (see below). Such variation of sound speeds along the propagation path of acoustic signals causes refraction and often yields a continuous change in the gazing angle of a propagating signal.



      Early experiments with water compressibility have been recorded almost 260 years ago, see: J. Canton, "Experiments to prove that water is not incompressible", journal_cover Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 52 (1761) 640-643. (Archive.org).



      Visit the London South Bank University webpage: "Explanation of the Density Anomalies of Water", section: "D13   Water has an unusually low compressibility (0.46 GPa$underline^-1$, compare CCl4 1.05 GPa$underline^-1$, at 25 °C) $underline^[f]$", on their "Water Structure and Science" website for more than you could ever want to know about water:



      [f] Others take a contrary view, stating that water's compressibility is twice that expected [53b]. This difference is down to the viewpoint and different theoretical expectations. In both cases, water's compressibility is unexpected; either being greater than expected due to water's open structure or less than expected (in spite of its open structure) due to the cohesive nature of its extensive hydrogen-bonding.

      [53 a-b] (a) H. E. Stanley, S. V. Budyrev, M. Canpolat, M. Meyer, O. Mishima, M. R. Sadr-Lahijany, A. Scala and F. W. Starr, The puzzling statistical physics of liquid water, Physica A 257 (1998) 213-232. (b) H. E. Stanley, P. Kumar, L. Xu, Z. Yan, M. G. Mazza, S. V. Buldyrev, S.-H. Chen and F. Mallamace, The puzzling unsolved mysteries of liquid water: Some recent progress, Physica A 386 (2007) 729-743.




      "Although commonly erroneously thought to be incompressible, water has been understood to be compressible for over 250 years. It may be considered that water should have a high isothermal compressibility ($beta_T$) and adiabatic compressibility ($beta_S$), as the large cavities in liquid water allows plenty of scope for the water structure to collapse under pressure without water molecules approaching close enough to repel each other.



      $beta_T = - left [ frac partial Vpartial P right ]_T times frac 1V = left [ frac partial rhopartial P right ]_T times frac 1rho = left [ frac partial L n rhopartial L n P right ]_T = - left [ frac partial ^2 Gpartial P^2 right ]_T times frac 1V = frac left< middle ( delta V middle)^2 right>k_BTV
      $



      $beta_S = - left [ frac partial Vpartial P right ]_S times frac 1V = - left [ frac partial ^2 Hpartial P^2 right ]_S times frac 1V$



      $left ( frac partial alpha _Ppartial P right )_T = - left ( frac partial beta _Tpartial T right )_P
      $



      where $beta_T, beta_S, alpha _P, k_B, P, T, N, rho, V, H$ and $S$ are the isothermal compressibility, adiabatic compressibility, thermal expansion, Boltzmann constant, pressure, temperature, number of molecules, density, volume, enthalpy and entropy respectively; the $left< , , right>$ brackets indicate the fluctuations in the values about their mean values.



      The compressibility at constant temperature ($beta_T$) of water depends on fluctuations in its density. In 'normal' liquids, these fluctuations are expected to reduce with thermal motions as the liquid cools down. This is not the case for water below 46.5 °C (see below).



      The deformation causes the growth in the radial distribution function peak at about 3.5 Å with increasing or pressure (and temperature), due to the collapsing structure. The low compressibility of water is due to water's high-density, again due to the cohesive nature of the extensive hydrogen-bonding. This reduces the free space (compared with other liquids) to a greater extent than the contained cavities increase it.




      The speed and direction of sound in water and rock is far more complicated than the propagation of sound in ground level air. Propagation of sound is permitted by non-zero stiffness and lack of vacuum (a medium to transmit the sound). Even a steel rod will transfer sound.



      As explained on the HyperPhysics website the speed of sound in gases, liquids, and solids is predictable from their density and elastic properties of the media (bulk modulus). In water it's 1482 m/s at 20°C.



      Sound in liquids also travels as longitudinal waves, it is only in solids that traverse waves propagate. The manner in which sound propagates in liquids varies mostly due to depth, other minor factors are explained in detail below.



      In shallow water reflections from the surface and bed play a role. When the sound source and receiver are located at the depth of the sound speed minimum, called the SOFAR or sound channel axis, some sound waves travel nearly straight, cycling above and below the axis, others almost reaching both the surface and bottom. At SOFAR depths sound waves traveling from the source at angles of less than about 12° are refracted back toward the sound speed minimum before ever reaching the surface or sea floor. Low frequency sounds are attenuated the least while high frequency sounds are most greatly attenuated in the SOFAR channel.



      Sound traveling closest to the axis travels the shortest distance but at the slowest speed while sounds slightly off axis travel a curved path at a higher speed. This leads to explosions sounding like a series of bumps that get louder and louder as each path arrives at its destination.



      In underwater acoustics, speed of sound depends on pressure (hence depth), temperature, suspended or dissolved contents, and salinity of seawater, thus leading to vertical speed gradients similar to those that exist in atmospheric acoustics. Sound may be absorbed by losses at the fluid boundaries. Near the surface of the sea losses can occur in a bubble layer or in ice, while at the bottom sound can penetrate into the sediment and be absorbed.




      Sound speed

      Approximate values for fresh water and seawater, respectively, at atmospheric pressure are 1450 and 1500 m/s for the sound speed, and 1000 and 1030 kg/m³ for the density. The speed of sound in water increases with increasing pressure, temperature and salinity. The maximum speed in pure water under atmospheric pressure is attained at about 74 °C; sound travels slower in hotter water after that point; the maximum increases with pressure. On-line calculators can be found at Technical Guides – Speed of Sound in Sea-Water and Technical Guides – Speed of Sound in Pure Water. Those webpages offer simplified and more complicated estimates of the speed of sound underwater.







      Propagation of sound

      Underwater acoustic propagation depends on many factors. The direction of sound propagation is determined by the sound speed gradients in the water. This is an important thing that happens in water, because the speed of sound travel in water with velocity regular. In the sea the vertical gradients are generally much larger than the horizontal ones. Combining this with a tendency towards increasing sound speed at increasing depth, due to the increasing pressure in the deep sea, causes a reversal of the sound speed gradient in the thermocline, creating an efficient waveguide at the depth, corresponding to the minimum sound speed. The sound speed profile may cause regions of low sound intensity called "Shadow Zones", and regions of high intensity called "Caustics". These may be found by ray tracing methods.



      At equator and temperate latitudes in the ocean, the surface temperature is high enough to reverse the pressure effect, such that a sound speed minimum occurs at depth of a few hundred metres. The presence of this minimum creates a special channel known as Deep Sound Channel, previously known as the SOFAR (sound fixing and ranging) channel, permitting guided propagation of underwater sound for thousands of kilometres without interaction with the sea surface or the seabed. Another phenomenon in the deep sea is the formation of sound focusing areas, known as Convergence Zones. In this case sound is refracted downward from a near-surface source and then back up again. The horizontal distance from the source at which this occurs depends on the positive and negative sound speed gradients. A surface duct can also occur in both deep and moderately shallow water when there is upward refraction, for example due to cold surface temperatures. Propagation is by repeated sound bounces off the surface.




      Wikipedia's webpage on the speed of sound, section: "High-precision measurements in air", lists the speed of sound in air as "... at 0 °C. The result was 331.45 ± 0.01 m/s for dry air at STP, for frequencies from 93 Hz to 1,500 Hz.".



      Wikipedia lists the speed of sound in freshwater as "1481 m/s at 20 °C" but in seawater the calculations become more complex due to temperature and pressure resulting in a sound speed profile (SSP).



      Here is an example SSP at a location north of Hawaii:



      SSP example



      Propagation of sound in solids, such as rock, are subject to volumetric deformations (compression) and shear deformations (shearing) called pressure waves (longitudinal waves) and shear waves (transverse waves), respectively.




      In earthquakes, the corresponding seismic waves are called P-waves (primary waves) and S-waves (secondary waves), respectively. The sound velocities of these two types of waves propagating in a homogeneous 3-dimensional solid are respectively given by



      $$c_mathrm solid,p =sqrt frac K+frac 43Grho =sqrt frac E(1-nu )rho (1+nu )(1-2nu ),$$



      $$c_mathrm solid,s =sqrt frac Grho ,$$



      where



      $K$ is the bulk modulus of the elastic materials;
      $G$ is the shear modulus of the elastic materials;
      $E$ is the Young's modulus;
      $ρ$ is the density;
      $ν$ is Poisson's ratio.



      The last quantity is not an independent one, as $E = 3K(1 − 2ν)$. Note that the speed of pressure waves depends both on the pressure and shear resistance properties of the material, while the speed of shear waves depends on the shear properties only.



      Typically, pressure waves travel faster in materials than do shear waves, and in earthquakes this is the reason that the onset of an earthquake is often preceded by a quick upward-downward shock, before arrival of waves that produce a side-to-side motion.




      Similar to seawater the propagation of sound within the Earth isn't a simple formula:



      SSP in Earth



      Typical speeds of sound are 330 m/s in air, 1450 m/s in water, but are about 5000 m/s in granite for p-waves; s-waves travel approximately 60% of the speed of their accompanying p-wave. S-waves can not travel through liquids, that includes the Earth's core.




      Since compression is essential to sound propogation, how do phenomena such as whale calls and underwater speakers work?




      Water is compressible. The propagation of sound is possible in gases, liquids and solids.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        13














        13










        13







        $begingroup$


        Since sound travels as longitudinal waves, sound waves should only be able to propagate in a medium through compressions and rarefactions. However, water, as a liquid, is generally treated as an incompressible fluid.




        The underwater environment is characterized as an inhomogeneous medium, such inhomogeneity is due to point-to-point changes in underwater characteristics such as temperature, salinity, and pressure (depth), and other factors (see below). Such variation of sound speeds along the propagation path of acoustic signals causes refraction and often yields a continuous change in the gazing angle of a propagating signal.



        Early experiments with water compressibility have been recorded almost 260 years ago, see: J. Canton, "Experiments to prove that water is not incompressible", journal_cover Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 52 (1761) 640-643. (Archive.org).



        Visit the London South Bank University webpage: "Explanation of the Density Anomalies of Water", section: "D13   Water has an unusually low compressibility (0.46 GPa$underline^-1$, compare CCl4 1.05 GPa$underline^-1$, at 25 °C) $underline^[f]$", on their "Water Structure and Science" website for more than you could ever want to know about water:



        [f] Others take a contrary view, stating that water's compressibility is twice that expected [53b]. This difference is down to the viewpoint and different theoretical expectations. In both cases, water's compressibility is unexpected; either being greater than expected due to water's open structure or less than expected (in spite of its open structure) due to the cohesive nature of its extensive hydrogen-bonding.

        [53 a-b] (a) H. E. Stanley, S. V. Budyrev, M. Canpolat, M. Meyer, O. Mishima, M. R. Sadr-Lahijany, A. Scala and F. W. Starr, The puzzling statistical physics of liquid water, Physica A 257 (1998) 213-232. (b) H. E. Stanley, P. Kumar, L. Xu, Z. Yan, M. G. Mazza, S. V. Buldyrev, S.-H. Chen and F. Mallamace, The puzzling unsolved mysteries of liquid water: Some recent progress, Physica A 386 (2007) 729-743.




        "Although commonly erroneously thought to be incompressible, water has been understood to be compressible for over 250 years. It may be considered that water should have a high isothermal compressibility ($beta_T$) and adiabatic compressibility ($beta_S$), as the large cavities in liquid water allows plenty of scope for the water structure to collapse under pressure without water molecules approaching close enough to repel each other.



        $beta_T = - left [ frac partial Vpartial P right ]_T times frac 1V = left [ frac partial rhopartial P right ]_T times frac 1rho = left [ frac partial L n rhopartial L n P right ]_T = - left [ frac partial ^2 Gpartial P^2 right ]_T times frac 1V = frac left< middle ( delta V middle)^2 right>k_BTV
        $



        $beta_S = - left [ frac partial Vpartial P right ]_S times frac 1V = - left [ frac partial ^2 Hpartial P^2 right ]_S times frac 1V$



        $left ( frac partial alpha _Ppartial P right )_T = - left ( frac partial beta _Tpartial T right )_P
        $



        where $beta_T, beta_S, alpha _P, k_B, P, T, N, rho, V, H$ and $S$ are the isothermal compressibility, adiabatic compressibility, thermal expansion, Boltzmann constant, pressure, temperature, number of molecules, density, volume, enthalpy and entropy respectively; the $left< , , right>$ brackets indicate the fluctuations in the values about their mean values.



        The compressibility at constant temperature ($beta_T$) of water depends on fluctuations in its density. In 'normal' liquids, these fluctuations are expected to reduce with thermal motions as the liquid cools down. This is not the case for water below 46.5 °C (see below).



        The deformation causes the growth in the radial distribution function peak at about 3.5 Å with increasing or pressure (and temperature), due to the collapsing structure. The low compressibility of water is due to water's high-density, again due to the cohesive nature of the extensive hydrogen-bonding. This reduces the free space (compared with other liquids) to a greater extent than the contained cavities increase it.




        The speed and direction of sound in water and rock is far more complicated than the propagation of sound in ground level air. Propagation of sound is permitted by non-zero stiffness and lack of vacuum (a medium to transmit the sound). Even a steel rod will transfer sound.



        As explained on the HyperPhysics website the speed of sound in gases, liquids, and solids is predictable from their density and elastic properties of the media (bulk modulus). In water it's 1482 m/s at 20°C.



        Sound in liquids also travels as longitudinal waves, it is only in solids that traverse waves propagate. The manner in which sound propagates in liquids varies mostly due to depth, other minor factors are explained in detail below.



        In shallow water reflections from the surface and bed play a role. When the sound source and receiver are located at the depth of the sound speed minimum, called the SOFAR or sound channel axis, some sound waves travel nearly straight, cycling above and below the axis, others almost reaching both the surface and bottom. At SOFAR depths sound waves traveling from the source at angles of less than about 12° are refracted back toward the sound speed minimum before ever reaching the surface or sea floor. Low frequency sounds are attenuated the least while high frequency sounds are most greatly attenuated in the SOFAR channel.



        Sound traveling closest to the axis travels the shortest distance but at the slowest speed while sounds slightly off axis travel a curved path at a higher speed. This leads to explosions sounding like a series of bumps that get louder and louder as each path arrives at its destination.



        In underwater acoustics, speed of sound depends on pressure (hence depth), temperature, suspended or dissolved contents, and salinity of seawater, thus leading to vertical speed gradients similar to those that exist in atmospheric acoustics. Sound may be absorbed by losses at the fluid boundaries. Near the surface of the sea losses can occur in a bubble layer or in ice, while at the bottom sound can penetrate into the sediment and be absorbed.




        Sound speed

        Approximate values for fresh water and seawater, respectively, at atmospheric pressure are 1450 and 1500 m/s for the sound speed, and 1000 and 1030 kg/m³ for the density. The speed of sound in water increases with increasing pressure, temperature and salinity. The maximum speed in pure water under atmospheric pressure is attained at about 74 °C; sound travels slower in hotter water after that point; the maximum increases with pressure. On-line calculators can be found at Technical Guides – Speed of Sound in Sea-Water and Technical Guides – Speed of Sound in Pure Water. Those webpages offer simplified and more complicated estimates of the speed of sound underwater.







        Propagation of sound

        Underwater acoustic propagation depends on many factors. The direction of sound propagation is determined by the sound speed gradients in the water. This is an important thing that happens in water, because the speed of sound travel in water with velocity regular. In the sea the vertical gradients are generally much larger than the horizontal ones. Combining this with a tendency towards increasing sound speed at increasing depth, due to the increasing pressure in the deep sea, causes a reversal of the sound speed gradient in the thermocline, creating an efficient waveguide at the depth, corresponding to the minimum sound speed. The sound speed profile may cause regions of low sound intensity called "Shadow Zones", and regions of high intensity called "Caustics". These may be found by ray tracing methods.



        At equator and temperate latitudes in the ocean, the surface temperature is high enough to reverse the pressure effect, such that a sound speed minimum occurs at depth of a few hundred metres. The presence of this minimum creates a special channel known as Deep Sound Channel, previously known as the SOFAR (sound fixing and ranging) channel, permitting guided propagation of underwater sound for thousands of kilometres without interaction with the sea surface or the seabed. Another phenomenon in the deep sea is the formation of sound focusing areas, known as Convergence Zones. In this case sound is refracted downward from a near-surface source and then back up again. The horizontal distance from the source at which this occurs depends on the positive and negative sound speed gradients. A surface duct can also occur in both deep and moderately shallow water when there is upward refraction, for example due to cold surface temperatures. Propagation is by repeated sound bounces off the surface.




        Wikipedia's webpage on the speed of sound, section: "High-precision measurements in air", lists the speed of sound in air as "... at 0 °C. The result was 331.45 ± 0.01 m/s for dry air at STP, for frequencies from 93 Hz to 1,500 Hz.".



        Wikipedia lists the speed of sound in freshwater as "1481 m/s at 20 °C" but in seawater the calculations become more complex due to temperature and pressure resulting in a sound speed profile (SSP).



        Here is an example SSP at a location north of Hawaii:



        SSP example



        Propagation of sound in solids, such as rock, are subject to volumetric deformations (compression) and shear deformations (shearing) called pressure waves (longitudinal waves) and shear waves (transverse waves), respectively.




        In earthquakes, the corresponding seismic waves are called P-waves (primary waves) and S-waves (secondary waves), respectively. The sound velocities of these two types of waves propagating in a homogeneous 3-dimensional solid are respectively given by



        $$c_mathrm solid,p =sqrt frac K+frac 43Grho =sqrt frac E(1-nu )rho (1+nu )(1-2nu ),$$



        $$c_mathrm solid,s =sqrt frac Grho ,$$



        where



        $K$ is the bulk modulus of the elastic materials;
        $G$ is the shear modulus of the elastic materials;
        $E$ is the Young's modulus;
        $ρ$ is the density;
        $ν$ is Poisson's ratio.



        The last quantity is not an independent one, as $E = 3K(1 − 2ν)$. Note that the speed of pressure waves depends both on the pressure and shear resistance properties of the material, while the speed of shear waves depends on the shear properties only.



        Typically, pressure waves travel faster in materials than do shear waves, and in earthquakes this is the reason that the onset of an earthquake is often preceded by a quick upward-downward shock, before arrival of waves that produce a side-to-side motion.




        Similar to seawater the propagation of sound within the Earth isn't a simple formula:



        SSP in Earth



        Typical speeds of sound are 330 m/s in air, 1450 m/s in water, but are about 5000 m/s in granite for p-waves; s-waves travel approximately 60% of the speed of their accompanying p-wave. S-waves can not travel through liquids, that includes the Earth's core.




        Since compression is essential to sound propogation, how do phenomena such as whale calls and underwater speakers work?




        Water is compressible. The propagation of sound is possible in gases, liquids and solids.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$




        Since sound travels as longitudinal waves, sound waves should only be able to propagate in a medium through compressions and rarefactions. However, water, as a liquid, is generally treated as an incompressible fluid.




        The underwater environment is characterized as an inhomogeneous medium, such inhomogeneity is due to point-to-point changes in underwater characteristics such as temperature, salinity, and pressure (depth), and other factors (see below). Such variation of sound speeds along the propagation path of acoustic signals causes refraction and often yields a continuous change in the gazing angle of a propagating signal.



        Early experiments with water compressibility have been recorded almost 260 years ago, see: J. Canton, "Experiments to prove that water is not incompressible", journal_cover Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 52 (1761) 640-643. (Archive.org).



        Visit the London South Bank University webpage: "Explanation of the Density Anomalies of Water", section: "D13   Water has an unusually low compressibility (0.46 GPa$underline^-1$, compare CCl4 1.05 GPa$underline^-1$, at 25 °C) $underline^[f]$", on their "Water Structure and Science" website for more than you could ever want to know about water:



        [f] Others take a contrary view, stating that water's compressibility is twice that expected [53b]. This difference is down to the viewpoint and different theoretical expectations. In both cases, water's compressibility is unexpected; either being greater than expected due to water's open structure or less than expected (in spite of its open structure) due to the cohesive nature of its extensive hydrogen-bonding.

        [53 a-b] (a) H. E. Stanley, S. V. Budyrev, M. Canpolat, M. Meyer, O. Mishima, M. R. Sadr-Lahijany, A. Scala and F. W. Starr, The puzzling statistical physics of liquid water, Physica A 257 (1998) 213-232. (b) H. E. Stanley, P. Kumar, L. Xu, Z. Yan, M. G. Mazza, S. V. Buldyrev, S.-H. Chen and F. Mallamace, The puzzling unsolved mysteries of liquid water: Some recent progress, Physica A 386 (2007) 729-743.




        "Although commonly erroneously thought to be incompressible, water has been understood to be compressible for over 250 years. It may be considered that water should have a high isothermal compressibility ($beta_T$) and adiabatic compressibility ($beta_S$), as the large cavities in liquid water allows plenty of scope for the water structure to collapse under pressure without water molecules approaching close enough to repel each other.



        $beta_T = - left [ frac partial Vpartial P right ]_T times frac 1V = left [ frac partial rhopartial P right ]_T times frac 1rho = left [ frac partial L n rhopartial L n P right ]_T = - left [ frac partial ^2 Gpartial P^2 right ]_T times frac 1V = frac left< middle ( delta V middle)^2 right>k_BTV
        $



        $beta_S = - left [ frac partial Vpartial P right ]_S times frac 1V = - left [ frac partial ^2 Hpartial P^2 right ]_S times frac 1V$



        $left ( frac partial alpha _Ppartial P right )_T = - left ( frac partial beta _Tpartial T right )_P
        $



        where $beta_T, beta_S, alpha _P, k_B, P, T, N, rho, V, H$ and $S$ are the isothermal compressibility, adiabatic compressibility, thermal expansion, Boltzmann constant, pressure, temperature, number of molecules, density, volume, enthalpy and entropy respectively; the $left< , , right>$ brackets indicate the fluctuations in the values about their mean values.



        The compressibility at constant temperature ($beta_T$) of water depends on fluctuations in its density. In 'normal' liquids, these fluctuations are expected to reduce with thermal motions as the liquid cools down. This is not the case for water below 46.5 °C (see below).



        The deformation causes the growth in the radial distribution function peak at about 3.5 Å with increasing or pressure (and temperature), due to the collapsing structure. The low compressibility of water is due to water's high-density, again due to the cohesive nature of the extensive hydrogen-bonding. This reduces the free space (compared with other liquids) to a greater extent than the contained cavities increase it.




        The speed and direction of sound in water and rock is far more complicated than the propagation of sound in ground level air. Propagation of sound is permitted by non-zero stiffness and lack of vacuum (a medium to transmit the sound). Even a steel rod will transfer sound.



        As explained on the HyperPhysics website the speed of sound in gases, liquids, and solids is predictable from their density and elastic properties of the media (bulk modulus). In water it's 1482 m/s at 20°C.



        Sound in liquids also travels as longitudinal waves, it is only in solids that traverse waves propagate. The manner in which sound propagates in liquids varies mostly due to depth, other minor factors are explained in detail below.



        In shallow water reflections from the surface and bed play a role. When the sound source and receiver are located at the depth of the sound speed minimum, called the SOFAR or sound channel axis, some sound waves travel nearly straight, cycling above and below the axis, others almost reaching both the surface and bottom. At SOFAR depths sound waves traveling from the source at angles of less than about 12° are refracted back toward the sound speed minimum before ever reaching the surface or sea floor. Low frequency sounds are attenuated the least while high frequency sounds are most greatly attenuated in the SOFAR channel.



        Sound traveling closest to the axis travels the shortest distance but at the slowest speed while sounds slightly off axis travel a curved path at a higher speed. This leads to explosions sounding like a series of bumps that get louder and louder as each path arrives at its destination.



        In underwater acoustics, speed of sound depends on pressure (hence depth), temperature, suspended or dissolved contents, and salinity of seawater, thus leading to vertical speed gradients similar to those that exist in atmospheric acoustics. Sound may be absorbed by losses at the fluid boundaries. Near the surface of the sea losses can occur in a bubble layer or in ice, while at the bottom sound can penetrate into the sediment and be absorbed.




        Sound speed

        Approximate values for fresh water and seawater, respectively, at atmospheric pressure are 1450 and 1500 m/s for the sound speed, and 1000 and 1030 kg/m³ for the density. The speed of sound in water increases with increasing pressure, temperature and salinity. The maximum speed in pure water under atmospheric pressure is attained at about 74 °C; sound travels slower in hotter water after that point; the maximum increases with pressure. On-line calculators can be found at Technical Guides – Speed of Sound in Sea-Water and Technical Guides – Speed of Sound in Pure Water. Those webpages offer simplified and more complicated estimates of the speed of sound underwater.







        Propagation of sound

        Underwater acoustic propagation depends on many factors. The direction of sound propagation is determined by the sound speed gradients in the water. This is an important thing that happens in water, because the speed of sound travel in water with velocity regular. In the sea the vertical gradients are generally much larger than the horizontal ones. Combining this with a tendency towards increasing sound speed at increasing depth, due to the increasing pressure in the deep sea, causes a reversal of the sound speed gradient in the thermocline, creating an efficient waveguide at the depth, corresponding to the minimum sound speed. The sound speed profile may cause regions of low sound intensity called "Shadow Zones", and regions of high intensity called "Caustics". These may be found by ray tracing methods.



        At equator and temperate latitudes in the ocean, the surface temperature is high enough to reverse the pressure effect, such that a sound speed minimum occurs at depth of a few hundred metres. The presence of this minimum creates a special channel known as Deep Sound Channel, previously known as the SOFAR (sound fixing and ranging) channel, permitting guided propagation of underwater sound for thousands of kilometres without interaction with the sea surface or the seabed. Another phenomenon in the deep sea is the formation of sound focusing areas, known as Convergence Zones. In this case sound is refracted downward from a near-surface source and then back up again. The horizontal distance from the source at which this occurs depends on the positive and negative sound speed gradients. A surface duct can also occur in both deep and moderately shallow water when there is upward refraction, for example due to cold surface temperatures. Propagation is by repeated sound bounces off the surface.




        Wikipedia's webpage on the speed of sound, section: "High-precision measurements in air", lists the speed of sound in air as "... at 0 °C. The result was 331.45 ± 0.01 m/s for dry air at STP, for frequencies from 93 Hz to 1,500 Hz.".



        Wikipedia lists the speed of sound in freshwater as "1481 m/s at 20 °C" but in seawater the calculations become more complex due to temperature and pressure resulting in a sound speed profile (SSP).



        Here is an example SSP at a location north of Hawaii:



        SSP example



        Propagation of sound in solids, such as rock, are subject to volumetric deformations (compression) and shear deformations (shearing) called pressure waves (longitudinal waves) and shear waves (transverse waves), respectively.




        In earthquakes, the corresponding seismic waves are called P-waves (primary waves) and S-waves (secondary waves), respectively. The sound velocities of these two types of waves propagating in a homogeneous 3-dimensional solid are respectively given by



        $$c_mathrm solid,p =sqrt frac K+frac 43Grho =sqrt frac E(1-nu )rho (1+nu )(1-2nu ),$$



        $$c_mathrm solid,s =sqrt frac Grho ,$$



        where



        $K$ is the bulk modulus of the elastic materials;
        $G$ is the shear modulus of the elastic materials;
        $E$ is the Young's modulus;
        $ρ$ is the density;
        $ν$ is Poisson's ratio.



        The last quantity is not an independent one, as $E = 3K(1 − 2ν)$. Note that the speed of pressure waves depends both on the pressure and shear resistance properties of the material, while the speed of shear waves depends on the shear properties only.



        Typically, pressure waves travel faster in materials than do shear waves, and in earthquakes this is the reason that the onset of an earthquake is often preceded by a quick upward-downward shock, before arrival of waves that produce a side-to-side motion.




        Similar to seawater the propagation of sound within the Earth isn't a simple formula:



        SSP in Earth



        Typical speeds of sound are 330 m/s in air, 1450 m/s in water, but are about 5000 m/s in granite for p-waves; s-waves travel approximately 60% of the speed of their accompanying p-wave. S-waves can not travel through liquids, that includes the Earth's core.




        Since compression is essential to sound propogation, how do phenomena such as whale calls and underwater speakers work?




        Water is compressible. The propagation of sound is possible in gases, liquids and solids.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered 2 days ago









        RobRob

        1,8601 gold badge4 silver badges22 bronze badges




        1,8601 gold badge4 silver badges22 bronze badges
























            1














            $begingroup$

            Well basically the incompressibility of the water is just an approximation. You can always compress the water molecules; in fact, let's show how the phenomenon of propagation happens.



            We know that compression of the molecules by giving them a potential energy, so if we make them vibrate this will create a difference of pressure. The energy will be transferred to the other molecules, and thus the sound wave will propagate through the medium depending on the nature of the medium. If it is a gas the velocity of propagation will be less since the molecules are farther from each other than in liquids. The speed of sound in water will be much higher because the molecules now are closer together, so the transfer of the energy and vibration will be faster than in the air.



            That's why when you drown your head into the water you can never localize a sound source. The sound wave will hit your ears at the same time due to the speed of propagation $Vapprox 1500 mathrmm/s$






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor



            user212525 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            $endgroup$










            • 4




              $begingroup$
              I have edited your question this time, but please make sure to make your answer readable. Use punctuation to separate your sentences. Also, please make sure to use full words (nothing like "cuz" instead of "because". It is also helpful to separate your answer into paragraphs rather than just posting a wall of text.
              $endgroup$
              – Aaron Stevens
              2 days ago















            1














            $begingroup$

            Well basically the incompressibility of the water is just an approximation. You can always compress the water molecules; in fact, let's show how the phenomenon of propagation happens.



            We know that compression of the molecules by giving them a potential energy, so if we make them vibrate this will create a difference of pressure. The energy will be transferred to the other molecules, and thus the sound wave will propagate through the medium depending on the nature of the medium. If it is a gas the velocity of propagation will be less since the molecules are farther from each other than in liquids. The speed of sound in water will be much higher because the molecules now are closer together, so the transfer of the energy and vibration will be faster than in the air.



            That's why when you drown your head into the water you can never localize a sound source. The sound wave will hit your ears at the same time due to the speed of propagation $Vapprox 1500 mathrmm/s$






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor



            user212525 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            $endgroup$










            • 4




              $begingroup$
              I have edited your question this time, but please make sure to make your answer readable. Use punctuation to separate your sentences. Also, please make sure to use full words (nothing like "cuz" instead of "because". It is also helpful to separate your answer into paragraphs rather than just posting a wall of text.
              $endgroup$
              – Aaron Stevens
              2 days ago













            1














            1










            1







            $begingroup$

            Well basically the incompressibility of the water is just an approximation. You can always compress the water molecules; in fact, let's show how the phenomenon of propagation happens.



            We know that compression of the molecules by giving them a potential energy, so if we make them vibrate this will create a difference of pressure. The energy will be transferred to the other molecules, and thus the sound wave will propagate through the medium depending on the nature of the medium. If it is a gas the velocity of propagation will be less since the molecules are farther from each other than in liquids. The speed of sound in water will be much higher because the molecules now are closer together, so the transfer of the energy and vibration will be faster than in the air.



            That's why when you drown your head into the water you can never localize a sound source. The sound wave will hit your ears at the same time due to the speed of propagation $Vapprox 1500 mathrmm/s$






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor



            user212525 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            $endgroup$



            Well basically the incompressibility of the water is just an approximation. You can always compress the water molecules; in fact, let's show how the phenomenon of propagation happens.



            We know that compression of the molecules by giving them a potential energy, so if we make them vibrate this will create a difference of pressure. The energy will be transferred to the other molecules, and thus the sound wave will propagate through the medium depending on the nature of the medium. If it is a gas the velocity of propagation will be less since the molecules are farther from each other than in liquids. The speed of sound in water will be much higher because the molecules now are closer together, so the transfer of the energy and vibration will be faster than in the air.



            That's why when you drown your head into the water you can never localize a sound source. The sound wave will hit your ears at the same time due to the speed of propagation $Vapprox 1500 mathrmm/s$







            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor



            user212525 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago









            Aaron Stevens

            23.7k5 gold badges47 silver badges80 bronze badges




            23.7k5 gold badges47 silver badges80 bronze badges






            New contributor



            user212525 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            answered 2 days ago









            user212525user212525

            211 bronze badge




            211 bronze badge




            New contributor



            user212525 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.




            New contributor




            user212525 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.












            • 4




              $begingroup$
              I have edited your question this time, but please make sure to make your answer readable. Use punctuation to separate your sentences. Also, please make sure to use full words (nothing like "cuz" instead of "because". It is also helpful to separate your answer into paragraphs rather than just posting a wall of text.
              $endgroup$
              – Aaron Stevens
              2 days ago












            • 4




              $begingroup$
              I have edited your question this time, but please make sure to make your answer readable. Use punctuation to separate your sentences. Also, please make sure to use full words (nothing like "cuz" instead of "because". It is also helpful to separate your answer into paragraphs rather than just posting a wall of text.
              $endgroup$
              – Aaron Stevens
              2 days ago







            4




            4




            $begingroup$
            I have edited your question this time, but please make sure to make your answer readable. Use punctuation to separate your sentences. Also, please make sure to use full words (nothing like "cuz" instead of "because". It is also helpful to separate your answer into paragraphs rather than just posting a wall of text.
            $endgroup$
            – Aaron Stevens
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            I have edited your question this time, but please make sure to make your answer readable. Use punctuation to separate your sentences. Also, please make sure to use full words (nothing like "cuz" instead of "because". It is also helpful to separate your answer into paragraphs rather than just posting a wall of text.
            $endgroup$
            – Aaron Stevens
            2 days ago





            protected by AccidentalFourierTransform 2 days ago



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



            Popular posts from this blog

            19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

            Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

            Черчино Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију46°09′29″ СГШ; 9°30′29″ ИГД / 46.15809° СГШ; 9.50814° ИГД / 46.15809; 9.5081446°09′29″ СГШ; 9°30′29″ ИГД / 46.15809° СГШ; 9.50814° ИГД / 46.15809; 9.508143179111„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”Званични веб-сајтпроширитиуу