How does NAND gate work? (Very basic question)Why doesn't current flow through the common part of a circuit?What is the voltage of Vo in this circuit without a closed loop?How does the OR gate work?If there is a branch and the two paths lead back to the same ground, will they both recieve power?How does a Miller cap physically create a pole in circuits?Detecting a connection to a distinct circuit with no current returnIs the flow of current in this RL circuit ambiguously defined?Question About Current Flow DirectionWhat's the reason for this symmetry argument?Will I be able to keep this circuit on by routing the emitter to the base?

What happened to Rhaegal?

Why are notes ordered like they are on a piano?

Save terminal output to a txt file

Does hiding behind 5-ft-wide cover give full cover?

Packet sniffer for MacOS Mojave and above

If 1. e4 c6 is considered as a sound defense for black, why is 1. c3 so rare?

Has any spacecraft ever had the ability to directly communicate with civilian air traffic control?

What happened to Ghost?

Why debootstrap can only run as root?

Pressure to defend the relevance of one's area of mathematics

Power LED from 3.3V Power Pin without Resistor

Is lying to get "gardening leave" fraud?

Does higher resolution in an image imply more bits per pixel?

Map one pandas column using two dictionaries

I’ve officially counted to infinity!

What was the state of the German rail system in 1944?

I caught several of my students plagiarizing. Could it be my fault as a teacher?

Hang 20lb projector screen on Hardieplank

Why do computer-science majors learn calculus?

Junior developer struggles: how to communicate with management?

Survey Confirmation - Emphasize the question or the answer?

Was the ancestor of SCSI, the SASI protocol, nothing more than a draft?

Why do freehub and cassette have only one position that matches?

Why is the SNP putting so much emphasis on currency plans?



How does NAND gate work? (Very basic question)


Why doesn't current flow through the common part of a circuit?What is the voltage of Vo in this circuit without a closed loop?How does the OR gate work?If there is a branch and the two paths lead back to the same ground, will they both recieve power?How does a Miller cap physically create a pole in circuits?Detecting a connection to a distinct circuit with no current returnIs the flow of current in this RL circuit ambiguously defined?Question About Current Flow DirectionWhat's the reason for this symmetry argument?Will I be able to keep this circuit on by routing the emitter to the base?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


I'll preface this question by saying that I am a software developer just starting to learn the basics of electronics, so it's very likely I'm missing some fundamental intuition here.



Below is a mechanical NAND gate with two switches. I think it's supposed to be obvious that when the switches are closed, the output Q is 0 rather than 1. I don't see why this is.



I see that when the two switches are closed, there is a path from V+ to ground, and that current will flow to ground. But there's also a path from V+ to Q, so won't some current still flow to the output, putting it in a 1 state?



The intuition I'm using (which may be totally wrong) is this:



  • Current acts like water gushing from V+ down all available paths.

  • At a junction, current will flow through both paths in an amount inversely proportional to resistance. In this case, both paths have no additional resistance so they should split the current equally.

  • The boolean equivalent of a 1 is that current is flowing through a point.

Please help me understand what I'm missing! And if you can point me to a book or online resource explaining these fundamentals, that would be very helpful. I've tried looking at a lot of "circuit tutorial" content on Google, but surprisingly haven't been able to resolve my confusion here.



schematic diagram










share|improve this question









New contributor




rampatowl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The source impedance of the switch is 0 while in normal logic it is <=50 Ohms so the load impedance being much higher permits many loads to applied without significant change in voltage. For TTL, the limit was 10 units of load. But for static CMOS , the limit depends on the equivalent input capacitance and current limit of the switch as this affects rise/fall time. T=RC
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$


I'll preface this question by saying that I am a software developer just starting to learn the basics of electronics, so it's very likely I'm missing some fundamental intuition here.



Below is a mechanical NAND gate with two switches. I think it's supposed to be obvious that when the switches are closed, the output Q is 0 rather than 1. I don't see why this is.



I see that when the two switches are closed, there is a path from V+ to ground, and that current will flow to ground. But there's also a path from V+ to Q, so won't some current still flow to the output, putting it in a 1 state?



The intuition I'm using (which may be totally wrong) is this:



  • Current acts like water gushing from V+ down all available paths.

  • At a junction, current will flow through both paths in an amount inversely proportional to resistance. In this case, both paths have no additional resistance so they should split the current equally.

  • The boolean equivalent of a 1 is that current is flowing through a point.

Please help me understand what I'm missing! And if you can point me to a book or online resource explaining these fundamentals, that would be very helpful. I've tried looking at a lot of "circuit tutorial" content on Google, but surprisingly haven't been able to resolve my confusion here.



schematic diagram










share|improve this question









New contributor




rampatowl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    The source impedance of the switch is 0 while in normal logic it is <=50 Ohms so the load impedance being much higher permits many loads to applied without significant change in voltage. For TTL, the limit was 10 units of load. But for static CMOS , the limit depends on the equivalent input capacitance and current limit of the switch as this affects rise/fall time. T=RC
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


I'll preface this question by saying that I am a software developer just starting to learn the basics of electronics, so it's very likely I'm missing some fundamental intuition here.



Below is a mechanical NAND gate with two switches. I think it's supposed to be obvious that when the switches are closed, the output Q is 0 rather than 1. I don't see why this is.



I see that when the two switches are closed, there is a path from V+ to ground, and that current will flow to ground. But there's also a path from V+ to Q, so won't some current still flow to the output, putting it in a 1 state?



The intuition I'm using (which may be totally wrong) is this:



  • Current acts like water gushing from V+ down all available paths.

  • At a junction, current will flow through both paths in an amount inversely proportional to resistance. In this case, both paths have no additional resistance so they should split the current equally.

  • The boolean equivalent of a 1 is that current is flowing through a point.

Please help me understand what I'm missing! And if you can point me to a book or online resource explaining these fundamentals, that would be very helpful. I've tried looking at a lot of "circuit tutorial" content on Google, but surprisingly haven't been able to resolve my confusion here.



schematic diagram










share|improve this question









New contributor




rampatowl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I'll preface this question by saying that I am a software developer just starting to learn the basics of electronics, so it's very likely I'm missing some fundamental intuition here.



Below is a mechanical NAND gate with two switches. I think it's supposed to be obvious that when the switches are closed, the output Q is 0 rather than 1. I don't see why this is.



I see that when the two switches are closed, there is a path from V+ to ground, and that current will flow to ground. But there's also a path from V+ to Q, so won't some current still flow to the output, putting it in a 1 state?



The intuition I'm using (which may be totally wrong) is this:



  • Current acts like water gushing from V+ down all available paths.

  • At a junction, current will flow through both paths in an amount inversely proportional to resistance. In this case, both paths have no additional resistance so they should split the current equally.

  • The boolean equivalent of a 1 is that current is flowing through a point.

Please help me understand what I'm missing! And if you can point me to a book or online resource explaining these fundamentals, that would be very helpful. I've tried looking at a lot of "circuit tutorial" content on Google, but surprisingly haven't been able to resolve my confusion here.



schematic diagram







circuit-analysis logic-gates






share|improve this question









New contributor




rampatowl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




rampatowl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









SamGibson

11.8k41739




11.8k41739






New contributor




rampatowl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









rampatowlrampatowl

1083




1083




New contributor




rampatowl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





rampatowl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






rampatowl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    The source impedance of the switch is 0 while in normal logic it is <=50 Ohms so the load impedance being much higher permits many loads to applied without significant change in voltage. For TTL, the limit was 10 units of load. But for static CMOS , the limit depends on the equivalent input capacitance and current limit of the switch as this affects rise/fall time. T=RC
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    The source impedance of the switch is 0 while in normal logic it is <=50 Ohms so the load impedance being much higher permits many loads to applied without significant change in voltage. For TTL, the limit was 10 units of load. But for static CMOS , the limit depends on the equivalent input capacitance and current limit of the switch as this affects rise/fall time. T=RC
    $endgroup$
    – Sunnyskyguy EE75
    3 hours ago
















$begingroup$
The source impedance of the switch is 0 while in normal logic it is <=50 Ohms so the load impedance being much higher permits many loads to applied without significant change in voltage. For TTL, the limit was 10 units of load. But for static CMOS , the limit depends on the equivalent input capacitance and current limit of the switch as this affects rise/fall time. T=RC
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
The source impedance of the switch is 0 while in normal logic it is <=50 Ohms so the load impedance being much higher permits many loads to applied without significant change in voltage. For TTL, the limit was 10 units of load. But for static CMOS , the limit depends on the equivalent input capacitance and current limit of the switch as this affects rise/fall time. T=RC
$endgroup$
– Sunnyskyguy EE75
3 hours ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$


The boolean equivalent of a 1 is that current is flowing through a point.




That's the fundamental confusion leading to difficulty in understanding the circuit.



Single ended logic like this encodes state as voltage not current.



Inputs of logic gates are designed to source or sink very little current, so the output of the previous stage is easily able to impose its intended voltage on the connection between output and the following input with very little current needing to flow.



Current-mode signaling does exist, but it's generally used only in noisy situations, for example the time-tested 4-20 mA current loop standard.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Gotcha. Can you explain why the voltage of Q is only positive when there is no path from V+ to ground?
    $endgroup$
    – rampatowl
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Because in a "tug of war" the low resistance switches win over the pulling resistor in imposing the voltage on their far side.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Stratton
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh of course! So is the rule something like: to determine whether an input pin is high or low, look at every defined component it is connected to, and it will take on the value of the defined component with the least resistance along the path to that component?
    $endgroup$
    – rampatowl
    2 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Approximately: but not just the components but what is behind them, in this case "stiff" voltage rails. And if the difference in resistances is not drastic then the voltage may end up intermediate.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Stratton
    2 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Thanks, I appreciate the help!
    $endgroup$
    – rampatowl
    2 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$

I also had this problem since I started learning a bit about electronics (I'm also a software engineer).



Electricity always wants to balance. If there is GND, all electricity will flow to there (actually the electrons move in reverse direction but let's ignore that for now).



This means if the switches are closed, and if Q > 0 V, all electricity will flow to GND, meaning Q will be 0 V in a very short time (read: almost instantly).



However, when one of the switches is open, the voltage from V+ will flow to Q if Q has less voltage than V+ (which is likely so), so Q will end up having the same voltage as V+.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    First off the "N" means that it inverts the input the schematic is sort of doing the same but it gets off track of how the gates work. If you drew it with a relay it would make more sense





    schematic





    simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



    You need to study pull down and pull up resistors, the value of the resistor limits the voltage, current is not an issue really because this is all at "logic level". I had a hard time with the logic stuff at first and then all of a sudden it all made sense, good luck my friend.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    vaporlock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      I found very useful the simple description of a NAND gate to act thusly
      "any zero in causes a one out".



      This circuit will do that





      schematic





      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Looks like an 'OR' gate to me... but maybe I just don't understand how you intend for those switches to work (that's a problem with your answer -- you didn't even try to describe their behavior)
        $endgroup$
        – Ben Voigt
        1 hour ago











      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
      StackExchange.schematics.init();
      );
      , "cicuitlab");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "135"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      rampatowl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f436144%2fhow-does-nand-gate-work-very-basic-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3












      $begingroup$


      The boolean equivalent of a 1 is that current is flowing through a point.




      That's the fundamental confusion leading to difficulty in understanding the circuit.



      Single ended logic like this encodes state as voltage not current.



      Inputs of logic gates are designed to source or sink very little current, so the output of the previous stage is easily able to impose its intended voltage on the connection between output and the following input with very little current needing to flow.



      Current-mode signaling does exist, but it's generally used only in noisy situations, for example the time-tested 4-20 mA current loop standard.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Gotcha. Can you explain why the voltage of Q is only positive when there is no path from V+ to ground?
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Because in a "tug of war" the low resistance switches win over the pulling resistor in imposing the voltage on their far side.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Stratton
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Oh of course! So is the rule something like: to determine whether an input pin is high or low, look at every defined component it is connected to, and it will take on the value of the defined component with the least resistance along the path to that component?
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Approximately: but not just the components but what is behind them, in this case "stiff" voltage rails. And if the difference in resistances is not drastic then the voltage may end up intermediate.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Stratton
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Thanks, I appreciate the help!
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago















      3












      $begingroup$


      The boolean equivalent of a 1 is that current is flowing through a point.




      That's the fundamental confusion leading to difficulty in understanding the circuit.



      Single ended logic like this encodes state as voltage not current.



      Inputs of logic gates are designed to source or sink very little current, so the output of the previous stage is easily able to impose its intended voltage on the connection between output and the following input with very little current needing to flow.



      Current-mode signaling does exist, but it's generally used only in noisy situations, for example the time-tested 4-20 mA current loop standard.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Gotcha. Can you explain why the voltage of Q is only positive when there is no path from V+ to ground?
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Because in a "tug of war" the low resistance switches win over the pulling resistor in imposing the voltage on their far side.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Stratton
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Oh of course! So is the rule something like: to determine whether an input pin is high or low, look at every defined component it is connected to, and it will take on the value of the defined component with the least resistance along the path to that component?
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Approximately: but not just the components but what is behind them, in this case "stiff" voltage rails. And if the difference in resistances is not drastic then the voltage may end up intermediate.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Stratton
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Thanks, I appreciate the help!
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago













      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      The boolean equivalent of a 1 is that current is flowing through a point.




      That's the fundamental confusion leading to difficulty in understanding the circuit.



      Single ended logic like this encodes state as voltage not current.



      Inputs of logic gates are designed to source or sink very little current, so the output of the previous stage is easily able to impose its intended voltage on the connection between output and the following input with very little current needing to flow.



      Current-mode signaling does exist, but it's generally used only in noisy situations, for example the time-tested 4-20 mA current loop standard.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$




      The boolean equivalent of a 1 is that current is flowing through a point.




      That's the fundamental confusion leading to difficulty in understanding the circuit.



      Single ended logic like this encodes state as voltage not current.



      Inputs of logic gates are designed to source or sink very little current, so the output of the previous stage is easily able to impose its intended voltage on the connection between output and the following input with very little current needing to flow.



      Current-mode signaling does exist, but it's generally used only in noisy situations, for example the time-tested 4-20 mA current loop standard.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited 3 hours ago

























      answered 3 hours ago









      Chris StrattonChris Stratton

      23.8k22867




      23.8k22867











      • $begingroup$
        Gotcha. Can you explain why the voltage of Q is only positive when there is no path from V+ to ground?
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Because in a "tug of war" the low resistance switches win over the pulling resistor in imposing the voltage on their far side.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Stratton
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Oh of course! So is the rule something like: to determine whether an input pin is high or low, look at every defined component it is connected to, and it will take on the value of the defined component with the least resistance along the path to that component?
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Approximately: but not just the components but what is behind them, in this case "stiff" voltage rails. And if the difference in resistances is not drastic then the voltage may end up intermediate.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Stratton
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Thanks, I appreciate the help!
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago
















      • $begingroup$
        Gotcha. Can you explain why the voltage of Q is only positive when there is no path from V+ to ground?
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Because in a "tug of war" the low resistance switches win over the pulling resistor in imposing the voltage on their far side.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Stratton
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Oh of course! So is the rule something like: to determine whether an input pin is high or low, look at every defined component it is connected to, and it will take on the value of the defined component with the least resistance along the path to that component?
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Approximately: but not just the components but what is behind them, in this case "stiff" voltage rails. And if the difference in resistances is not drastic then the voltage may end up intermediate.
        $endgroup$
        – Chris Stratton
        2 hours ago










      • $begingroup$
        Thanks, I appreciate the help!
        $endgroup$
        – rampatowl
        2 hours ago















      $begingroup$
      Gotcha. Can you explain why the voltage of Q is only positive when there is no path from V+ to ground?
      $endgroup$
      – rampatowl
      2 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Gotcha. Can you explain why the voltage of Q is only positive when there is no path from V+ to ground?
      $endgroup$
      – rampatowl
      2 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Because in a "tug of war" the low resistance switches win over the pulling resistor in imposing the voltage on their far side.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Stratton
      2 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Because in a "tug of war" the low resistance switches win over the pulling resistor in imposing the voltage on their far side.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Stratton
      2 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Oh of course! So is the rule something like: to determine whether an input pin is high or low, look at every defined component it is connected to, and it will take on the value of the defined component with the least resistance along the path to that component?
      $endgroup$
      – rampatowl
      2 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Oh of course! So is the rule something like: to determine whether an input pin is high or low, look at every defined component it is connected to, and it will take on the value of the defined component with the least resistance along the path to that component?
      $endgroup$
      – rampatowl
      2 hours ago




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      Approximately: but not just the components but what is behind them, in this case "stiff" voltage rails. And if the difference in resistances is not drastic then the voltage may end up intermediate.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Stratton
      2 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Approximately: but not just the components but what is behind them, in this case "stiff" voltage rails. And if the difference in resistances is not drastic then the voltage may end up intermediate.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Stratton
      2 hours ago












      $begingroup$
      Thanks, I appreciate the help!
      $endgroup$
      – rampatowl
      2 hours ago




      $begingroup$
      Thanks, I appreciate the help!
      $endgroup$
      – rampatowl
      2 hours ago













      1












      $begingroup$

      I also had this problem since I started learning a bit about electronics (I'm also a software engineer).



      Electricity always wants to balance. If there is GND, all electricity will flow to there (actually the electrons move in reverse direction but let's ignore that for now).



      This means if the switches are closed, and if Q > 0 V, all electricity will flow to GND, meaning Q will be 0 V in a very short time (read: almost instantly).



      However, when one of the switches is open, the voltage from V+ will flow to Q if Q has less voltage than V+ (which is likely so), so Q will end up having the same voltage as V+.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        I also had this problem since I started learning a bit about electronics (I'm also a software engineer).



        Electricity always wants to balance. If there is GND, all electricity will flow to there (actually the electrons move in reverse direction but let's ignore that for now).



        This means if the switches are closed, and if Q > 0 V, all electricity will flow to GND, meaning Q will be 0 V in a very short time (read: almost instantly).



        However, when one of the switches is open, the voltage from V+ will flow to Q if Q has less voltage than V+ (which is likely so), so Q will end up having the same voltage as V+.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          I also had this problem since I started learning a bit about electronics (I'm also a software engineer).



          Electricity always wants to balance. If there is GND, all electricity will flow to there (actually the electrons move in reverse direction but let's ignore that for now).



          This means if the switches are closed, and if Q > 0 V, all electricity will flow to GND, meaning Q will be 0 V in a very short time (read: almost instantly).



          However, when one of the switches is open, the voltage from V+ will flow to Q if Q has less voltage than V+ (which is likely so), so Q will end up having the same voltage as V+.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I also had this problem since I started learning a bit about electronics (I'm also a software engineer).



          Electricity always wants to balance. If there is GND, all electricity will flow to there (actually the electrons move in reverse direction but let's ignore that for now).



          This means if the switches are closed, and if Q > 0 V, all electricity will flow to GND, meaning Q will be 0 V in a very short time (read: almost instantly).



          However, when one of the switches is open, the voltage from V+ will flow to Q if Q has less voltage than V+ (which is likely so), so Q will end up having the same voltage as V+.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 3 hours ago









          Michel KeijzersMichel Keijzers

          7,26093373




          7,26093373





















              1












              $begingroup$

              First off the "N" means that it inverts the input the schematic is sort of doing the same but it gets off track of how the gates work. If you drew it with a relay it would make more sense





              schematic





              simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



              You need to study pull down and pull up resistors, the value of the resistor limits the voltage, current is not an issue really because this is all at "logic level". I had a hard time with the logic stuff at first and then all of a sudden it all made sense, good luck my friend.






              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              vaporlock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.






              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                First off the "N" means that it inverts the input the schematic is sort of doing the same but it gets off track of how the gates work. If you drew it with a relay it would make more sense





                schematic





                simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



                You need to study pull down and pull up resistors, the value of the resistor limits the voltage, current is not an issue really because this is all at "logic level". I had a hard time with the logic stuff at first and then all of a sudden it all made sense, good luck my friend.






                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                vaporlock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  First off the "N" means that it inverts the input the schematic is sort of doing the same but it gets off track of how the gates work. If you drew it with a relay it would make more sense





                  schematic





                  simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



                  You need to study pull down and pull up resistors, the value of the resistor limits the voltage, current is not an issue really because this is all at "logic level". I had a hard time with the logic stuff at first and then all of a sudden it all made sense, good luck my friend.






                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  vaporlock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$



                  First off the "N" means that it inverts the input the schematic is sort of doing the same but it gets off track of how the gates work. If you drew it with a relay it would make more sense





                  schematic





                  simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab



                  You need to study pull down and pull up resistors, the value of the resistor limits the voltage, current is not an issue really because this is all at "logic level". I had a hard time with the logic stuff at first and then all of a sudden it all made sense, good luck my friend.







                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  vaporlock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 hours ago





















                  New contributor




                  vaporlock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered 2 hours ago









                  vaporlockvaporlock

                  113




                  113




                  New contributor




                  vaporlock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  vaporlock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  vaporlock is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      I found very useful the simple description of a NAND gate to act thusly
                      "any zero in causes a one out".



                      This circuit will do that





                      schematic





                      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Looks like an 'OR' gate to me... but maybe I just don't understand how you intend for those switches to work (that's a problem with your answer -- you didn't even try to describe their behavior)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ben Voigt
                        1 hour ago















                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      I found very useful the simple description of a NAND gate to act thusly
                      "any zero in causes a one out".



                      This circuit will do that





                      schematic





                      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Looks like an 'OR' gate to me... but maybe I just don't understand how you intend for those switches to work (that's a problem with your answer -- you didn't even try to describe their behavior)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ben Voigt
                        1 hour ago













                      0












                      0








                      0





                      $begingroup$

                      I found very useful the simple description of a NAND gate to act thusly
                      "any zero in causes a one out".



                      This circuit will do that





                      schematic





                      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      I found very useful the simple description of a NAND gate to act thusly
                      "any zero in causes a one out".



                      This circuit will do that





                      schematic





                      simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 1 hour ago









                      analogsystemsrfanalogsystemsrf

                      16.6k2823




                      16.6k2823











                      • $begingroup$
                        Looks like an 'OR' gate to me... but maybe I just don't understand how you intend for those switches to work (that's a problem with your answer -- you didn't even try to describe their behavior)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ben Voigt
                        1 hour ago
















                      • $begingroup$
                        Looks like an 'OR' gate to me... but maybe I just don't understand how you intend for those switches to work (that's a problem with your answer -- you didn't even try to describe their behavior)
                        $endgroup$
                        – Ben Voigt
                        1 hour ago















                      $begingroup$
                      Looks like an 'OR' gate to me... but maybe I just don't understand how you intend for those switches to work (that's a problem with your answer -- you didn't even try to describe their behavior)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ben Voigt
                      1 hour ago




                      $begingroup$
                      Looks like an 'OR' gate to me... but maybe I just don't understand how you intend for those switches to work (that's a problem with your answer -- you didn't even try to describe their behavior)
                      $endgroup$
                      – Ben Voigt
                      1 hour ago










                      rampatowl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      rampatowl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      rampatowl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      rampatowl is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f436144%2fhow-does-nand-gate-work-very-basic-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                      Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                      Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)