Xjyuk

Moving a wrapfig vertically to encroach partially on a subsection title

What is the origin of 落第?

Why is std::move not [[nodiscard]] in C++20?

What initially awakened the Balrog?

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what is "Subsystem for UNIX-based Applications"?

Does the Mueller report show a conspiracy between Russia and the Trump Campaign?

A proverb that is used to imply that you have unexpectedly faced a big problem

A term for a woman complaining about things/begging in a cute/childish way

After Sam didn't return home in the end, were he and Al still friends?

New Order #6: Easter Egg

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

AppleTVs create a chatty alternate WiFi network

Where is the Next Backup Size entry on iOS 12?

NERDTreeMenu Remapping

How can a team of shapeshifters communicate?

GDP with Intermediate Production

What does Turing mean by this statement?

Google .dev domain strangely redirects to https

Why complex landing gears are used instead of simple,reliability and light weight muscle wire or shape memory alloys?

Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?

Universal covering space of the real projective line?

Getting out of while loop on console

Was Kant an Intuitionist about mathematical objects?

Why datecode is SO IMPORTANT to chip manufacturers?

Is it possible for an event A to be independent from event B, but not the other way around?

1

$begingroup$

I was wondering, if event $A$ is independent from event $B$, would $B$ also be independent of event $A$? My original thought was that it should be independent, but then I realized if $A$ is independent from $B$ then we have: $$P(A|B)=P(A)label1tag1$$ and for $B$ to be independent from $A$ we need to have: $$P(B|A)=P(B)label2tag2$$ but in $ref1$ if $P(A)=0$ then $ref2$ doesn't make sense, so then $B$ wouldn't be independent from $A$?

Thank you

probability-theory independence

share|cite|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

MashpaMashpa

273

New contributor

Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

1

$begingroup$

I was wondering, if event $A$ is independent from event $B$, would $B$ also be independent of event $A$? My original thought was that it should be independent, but then I realized if $A$ is independent from $B$ then we have: $$P(A|B)=P(A)label1tag1$$ and for $B$ to be independent from $A$ we need to have: $$P(B|A)=P(B)label2tag2$$ but in $ref1$ if $P(A)=0$ then $ref2$ doesn't make sense, so then $B$ wouldn't be independent from $A$?

Thank you

probability-theory independence

share|cite|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

MashpaMashpa

273

New contributor

Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

I was wondering, if event $A$ is independent from event $B$, would $B$ also be independent of event $A$? My original thought was that it should be independent, but then I realized if $A$ is independent from $B$ then we have: $$P(A|B)=P(A)label1tag1$$ and for $B$ to be independent from $A$ we need to have: $$P(B|A)=P(B)label2tag2$$ but in $ref1$ if $P(A)=0$ then $ref2$ doesn't make sense, so then $B$ wouldn't be independent from $A$?

Thank you

probability-theory independence

share|cite|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

MashpaMashpa

273

New contributor

Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

MashpaMashpa

273

New contributor

Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|cite|improve this question

asked 3 hours ago

MashpaMashpa

273

New contributor

Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 3 hours ago

MashpaMashpa

273

New contributor

Mashpa is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked 3 hours ago

MashpaMashpa

273

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

3

$begingroup$

$P(A mid B) = P(A)$ should not be taken as the definition of independence, $P(A cap B) = P(A)P(B)$ should be taken as the definition of independence. From this we can prove $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ as a corollary, provided that $P(B) > 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

bitesizebobitesizebo

1,78828

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

$P(A|B)=P(A)$ is not the correct definition of independence. The correct definition is $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. These definitions are equivalent if $P(B)>0$. With the correct definition there is symmetry between $A$ and $B$ so $A$ independent of $B$ is same as $B$ independent of $A$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

76.4k53370

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

$P(Bmid A)$ is undefined when $P(A)=0$, so you can’t draw any conclusions about independence of the two events from it. That one reason why (despite what the Wikipedia page on conditional probability might imply) the fundamental definition of independence of two events uses their joint probability: $A$ and $B$ are independent iff $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. This definition is symmetric.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

amdamd

32k21053

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

Mashpa is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3195328%2fis-it-possible-for-an-event-a-to-be-independent-from-event-b-but-not-the-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

3

$begingroup$

$P(A mid B) = P(A)$ should not be taken as the definition of independence, $P(A cap B) = P(A)P(B)$ should be taken as the definition of independence. From this we can prove $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ as a corollary, provided that $P(B) > 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

bitesizebobitesizebo

1,78828

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

$P(A mid B) = P(A)$ should not be taken as the definition of independence, $P(A cap B) = P(A)P(B)$ should be taken as the definition of independence. From this we can prove $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ as a corollary, provided that $P(B) > 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

bitesizebobitesizebo

1,78828

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

$P(A mid B) = P(A)$ should not be taken as the definition of independence, $P(A cap B) = P(A)P(B)$ should be taken as the definition of independence. From this we can prove $P(A mid B) = P(A)$ as a corollary, provided that $P(B) > 0$.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

bitesizebobitesizebo

1,78828

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

bitesizebobitesizebo

1,78828

answered 3 hours ago

bitesizebobitesizebo

1,78828

answered 3 hours ago

bitesizebobitesizebo

1,78828

3

$begingroup$

$P(A|B)=P(A)$ is not the correct definition of independence. The correct definition is $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. These definitions are equivalent if $P(B)>0$. With the correct definition there is symmetry between $A$ and $B$ so $A$ independent of $B$ is same as $B$ independent of $A$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

76.4k53370

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

$P(A|B)=P(A)$ is not the correct definition of independence. The correct definition is $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. These definitions are equivalent if $P(B)>0$. With the correct definition there is symmetry between $A$ and $B$ so $A$ independent of $B$ is same as $B$ independent of $A$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

76.4k53370

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

$P(A|B)=P(A)$ is not the correct definition of independence. The correct definition is $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. These definitions are equivalent if $P(B)>0$. With the correct definition there is symmetry between $A$ and $B$ so $A$ independent of $B$ is same as $B$ independent of $A$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

76.4k53370

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

76.4k53370

answered 3 hours ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

76.4k53370

answered 3 hours ago

Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

76.4k53370

3

$begingroup$

$P(Bmid A)$ is undefined when $P(A)=0$, so you can’t draw any conclusions about independence of the two events from it. That one reason why (despite what the Wikipedia page on conditional probability might imply) the fundamental definition of independence of two events uses their joint probability: $A$ and $B$ are independent iff $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. This definition is symmetric.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

amdamd

32k21053

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

3

$begingroup$

$P(Bmid A)$ is undefined when $P(A)=0$, so you can’t draw any conclusions about independence of the two events from it. That one reason why (despite what the Wikipedia page on conditional probability might imply) the fundamental definition of independence of two events uses their joint probability: $A$ and $B$ are independent iff $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. This definition is symmetric.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

amdamd

32k21053

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

$P(Bmid A)$ is undefined when $P(A)=0$, so you can’t draw any conclusions about independence of the two events from it. That one reason why (despite what the Wikipedia page on conditional probability might imply) the fundamental definition of independence of two events uses their joint probability: $A$ and $B$ are independent iff $P(Acap B)=P(A)P(B)$. This definition is symmetric.

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

amdamd

32k21053

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 3 hours ago

amdamd

32k21053

answered 3 hours ago

amdamd

32k21053

answered 3 hours ago

amdamd

32k21053