Find the 3D region containing the origin bounded by given planesUsing Mathematica to help to determine the consistency of and numerically solve systems of non-linear equationsHow to represent the lines that are formed by the intersection of two planes?Solving equations bounded by a regionRegion bounded by the curveFinding possible lattice planes of a crystal structureDrawing convex cone with given vectorsChanging the basis vectors of a 2D density plotFinding Intersections Between Arbitrary Surface and A LineGenerate convex-hull of a 15 dimensional spaceFind all integer tuples in a bounded region

Find the 3D region containing the origin bounded by given planes

Reference for electronegativities of different metal oxidation states

How to choose the correct exposure for flower photography?

Could a chemically propelled craft travel directly between Earth and Mars spaceports?

Can a problematic AL DM/organizer prevent me from running a separatate AL-legal game at the same store?

How does the "reverse syntax" in Middle English work?

Have the writers and actors of Game Of Thrones responded to its poor reception?

Germany rejected my entry to Schengen countries

What does it mean for a program to be 32 or 64 bit?

In How Many Ways Can We Partition a Set Into Smaller Subsets So The Sum of the Numbers In Each Subset Is Equal?

Does a windmilling propeller create more drag than a stopped propeller in an engine out scenario

Bash Read: Reading comma separated list, last element is missed

Can the bitcoin lightning network support more than 8 decimal places?

Precedent for disabled Kings

Chain rule instead of product rule

How come Arya Stark wasn't hurt by this in Game of Thrones Season 8 Episode 5?

Would it be possible to set up a franchise in the ancient world?

Is it wise to pay off mortgage with 401k?

Why is python script running in background consuming 100 % CPU?

Can I have a delimited macro with a literal # in the parameter text?

Very serious stuff - Salesforce bug enabled "Modify All"

Why are Marine Le Pen's possible connections with Steve Bannon something worth investigating?

Why favour the standard WP loop over iterating over (new WP_Query())->get_posts()?

Why does Taylor’s series “work”?



Find the 3D region containing the origin bounded by given planes


Using Mathematica to help to determine the consistency of and numerically solve systems of non-linear equationsHow to represent the lines that are formed by the intersection of two planes?Solving equations bounded by a regionRegion bounded by the curveFinding possible lattice planes of a crystal structureDrawing convex cone with given vectorsChanging the basis vectors of a 2D density plotFinding Intersections Between Arbitrary Surface and A LineGenerate convex-hull of a 15 dimensional spaceFind all integer tuples in a bounded region













1












$begingroup$


I'm writing a code to generate the Wigner-Seitz cell of the reciprocal lattice for a given set of lattice translation vectors. For example, consider the Body Centered Cubic (BCC) lattice whose basis translation vectors are given by



a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;


The reciprocal basis vectors are then defined according to



d = 2 Pi;
v = a1.(a2[Cross]a3);
b1 = d/v (a2[Cross]a3);
b2 = d/v (a3[Cross]a1);
b3 = d/v (a1[Cross]a2);


The reciprocal lattice is then defined by the set of reciprocal lattice vectors, the set of all linear combinations of integer multiples of reciprocal basis vectors, i.e.



$$vecG = n_1 vecb_1 + n_2 vecb_2 + n_3 vecb_3, qquad n_i in mathbbZ$$



The Wigner-Seitz cell (in this case the First Brillouin Zone) is defined as the region containing the origin which is bounded by the perpendicular bisecting planes of the reciprocal lattice vectors. We generally can accomplish this by only considering the first, second, and maybe third closest reciprocal lattice points to the origin. In the case of BCC, for example, the following vectors will suffice:



recipvecs = 
Select[Flatten[
Table[n1 b1 + n2 b2 + n3 b3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1], 2],
Norm[#] <= 2 d &];


Question: Given these vectors, how can I construct the Wigner-Seitz cell?



For example, one possibility is to construct the equations for all the planes



planes = (x, y, z - (#/2)).# == 0 & /@ reciplattice


(note there is a redundancy for the origin, which just gives True, this can be removed). Now the issue is going to be to rewrite each of these equations as an inequality such that the half-space defined by the inequality contains the origin. I don't think that would be too difficult, but not every one of the equations can be solved for any one of the coordinates, e.g. we cannot solve every equation for $z$, like



Solve[#, z] & /@ planes


Some of the equations will have to be solved for $x$ or $y$ before being turned into inequalities. I think I could find a brute force solution but I'm hoping there's something more elegant.



Ultimately I'd like to obtain the inequalities that define the region so that I can visualize it with RegionPlot3D and use it to Select points from a mesh.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    1












    $begingroup$


    I'm writing a code to generate the Wigner-Seitz cell of the reciprocal lattice for a given set of lattice translation vectors. For example, consider the Body Centered Cubic (BCC) lattice whose basis translation vectors are given by



    a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
    a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
    a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;


    The reciprocal basis vectors are then defined according to



    d = 2 Pi;
    v = a1.(a2[Cross]a3);
    b1 = d/v (a2[Cross]a3);
    b2 = d/v (a3[Cross]a1);
    b3 = d/v (a1[Cross]a2);


    The reciprocal lattice is then defined by the set of reciprocal lattice vectors, the set of all linear combinations of integer multiples of reciprocal basis vectors, i.e.



    $$vecG = n_1 vecb_1 + n_2 vecb_2 + n_3 vecb_3, qquad n_i in mathbbZ$$



    The Wigner-Seitz cell (in this case the First Brillouin Zone) is defined as the region containing the origin which is bounded by the perpendicular bisecting planes of the reciprocal lattice vectors. We generally can accomplish this by only considering the first, second, and maybe third closest reciprocal lattice points to the origin. In the case of BCC, for example, the following vectors will suffice:



    recipvecs = 
    Select[Flatten[
    Table[n1 b1 + n2 b2 + n3 b3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1], 2],
    Norm[#] <= 2 d &];


    Question: Given these vectors, how can I construct the Wigner-Seitz cell?



    For example, one possibility is to construct the equations for all the planes



    planes = (x, y, z - (#/2)).# == 0 & /@ reciplattice


    (note there is a redundancy for the origin, which just gives True, this can be removed). Now the issue is going to be to rewrite each of these equations as an inequality such that the half-space defined by the inequality contains the origin. I don't think that would be too difficult, but not every one of the equations can be solved for any one of the coordinates, e.g. we cannot solve every equation for $z$, like



    Solve[#, z] & /@ planes


    Some of the equations will have to be solved for $x$ or $y$ before being turned into inequalities. I think I could find a brute force solution but I'm hoping there's something more elegant.



    Ultimately I'd like to obtain the inequalities that define the region so that I can visualize it with RegionPlot3D and use it to Select points from a mesh.










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I'm writing a code to generate the Wigner-Seitz cell of the reciprocal lattice for a given set of lattice translation vectors. For example, consider the Body Centered Cubic (BCC) lattice whose basis translation vectors are given by



      a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
      a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
      a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;


      The reciprocal basis vectors are then defined according to



      d = 2 Pi;
      v = a1.(a2[Cross]a3);
      b1 = d/v (a2[Cross]a3);
      b2 = d/v (a3[Cross]a1);
      b3 = d/v (a1[Cross]a2);


      The reciprocal lattice is then defined by the set of reciprocal lattice vectors, the set of all linear combinations of integer multiples of reciprocal basis vectors, i.e.



      $$vecG = n_1 vecb_1 + n_2 vecb_2 + n_3 vecb_3, qquad n_i in mathbbZ$$



      The Wigner-Seitz cell (in this case the First Brillouin Zone) is defined as the region containing the origin which is bounded by the perpendicular bisecting planes of the reciprocal lattice vectors. We generally can accomplish this by only considering the first, second, and maybe third closest reciprocal lattice points to the origin. In the case of BCC, for example, the following vectors will suffice:



      recipvecs = 
      Select[Flatten[
      Table[n1 b1 + n2 b2 + n3 b3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1], 2],
      Norm[#] <= 2 d &];


      Question: Given these vectors, how can I construct the Wigner-Seitz cell?



      For example, one possibility is to construct the equations for all the planes



      planes = (x, y, z - (#/2)).# == 0 & /@ reciplattice


      (note there is a redundancy for the origin, which just gives True, this can be removed). Now the issue is going to be to rewrite each of these equations as an inequality such that the half-space defined by the inequality contains the origin. I don't think that would be too difficult, but not every one of the equations can be solved for any one of the coordinates, e.g. we cannot solve every equation for $z$, like



      Solve[#, z] & /@ planes


      Some of the equations will have to be solved for $x$ or $y$ before being turned into inequalities. I think I could find a brute force solution but I'm hoping there's something more elegant.



      Ultimately I'd like to obtain the inequalities that define the region so that I can visualize it with RegionPlot3D and use it to Select points from a mesh.










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm writing a code to generate the Wigner-Seitz cell of the reciprocal lattice for a given set of lattice translation vectors. For example, consider the Body Centered Cubic (BCC) lattice whose basis translation vectors are given by



      a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
      a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
      a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;


      The reciprocal basis vectors are then defined according to



      d = 2 Pi;
      v = a1.(a2[Cross]a3);
      b1 = d/v (a2[Cross]a3);
      b2 = d/v (a3[Cross]a1);
      b3 = d/v (a1[Cross]a2);


      The reciprocal lattice is then defined by the set of reciprocal lattice vectors, the set of all linear combinations of integer multiples of reciprocal basis vectors, i.e.



      $$vecG = n_1 vecb_1 + n_2 vecb_2 + n_3 vecb_3, qquad n_i in mathbbZ$$



      The Wigner-Seitz cell (in this case the First Brillouin Zone) is defined as the region containing the origin which is bounded by the perpendicular bisecting planes of the reciprocal lattice vectors. We generally can accomplish this by only considering the first, second, and maybe third closest reciprocal lattice points to the origin. In the case of BCC, for example, the following vectors will suffice:



      recipvecs = 
      Select[Flatten[
      Table[n1 b1 + n2 b2 + n3 b3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1], 2],
      Norm[#] <= 2 d &];


      Question: Given these vectors, how can I construct the Wigner-Seitz cell?



      For example, one possibility is to construct the equations for all the planes



      planes = (x, y, z - (#/2)).# == 0 & /@ reciplattice


      (note there is a redundancy for the origin, which just gives True, this can be removed). Now the issue is going to be to rewrite each of these equations as an inequality such that the half-space defined by the inequality contains the origin. I don't think that would be too difficult, but not every one of the equations can be solved for any one of the coordinates, e.g. we cannot solve every equation for $z$, like



      Solve[#, z] & /@ planes


      Some of the equations will have to be solved for $x$ or $y$ before being turned into inequalities. I think I could find a brute force solution but I'm hoping there's something more elegant.



      Ultimately I'd like to obtain the inequalities that define the region so that I can visualize it with RegionPlot3D and use it to Select points from a mesh.







      list-manipulation equation-solving graphics programming






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago







      Kai

















      asked 5 hours ago









      KaiKai

      55719




      55719




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Unfortunately, VoronoiMesh does not work in 3D. So we do it manually.



          the crystal lattice vectors:



          a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
          a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
          a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;


          the reciprocal lattice vectors: (Inverse is easier than using cross products, but ultimately the same thing)



          B = b1, b2, b3 = 2π*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];


          an inequality defining the perpendicular bisecting plane of a reciprocal lattice point v:



          pbp[0, 0, 0, r_] = True;
          pbp[v_, r_] := v.r/v.v <= 1/2


          make a list of such inequalities, And them, and simplify: (here you may have to go to larger s to get all the constraints, as you said)



          With[s = 1,
          WS[x_, y_, z_] = FullSimplify[
          And @@ Flatten[Table[pbp[n1,n2,n3.B, x,y,z], n1,-s,s, n2,-s,s, n3,-s,s]]]]



          -2 π <= y + z <= 2 π && z <= 2 π + x && x <= 2 π + z && y <= 2 π + x && x <= 2 π + y && -2 π <= x + z <= 2 π && z <= 2 π + y && y <= 2 π + z && -2 π <= x + y <= 2 π




          make a 3D plot of the Wigner-Seitz cell: (use more PlotPoints to make it prettier)



          With[t = 2π,
          RegionPlot3D[WS[x, y, z], x, -t, t, y, -t, t, z, -t, t]]


          enter image description here



          You can also check if a point is in the Wigner-Seitz cell or not:



          WS[0.1, 0.2, 0.3]
          (* True *)
          WS[3.1, 3.2, 0.3]
          (* False *)





          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$




















            2












            $begingroup$

            It is really unfortunate that we don't have a 3D implementation of VoronoiMesh.



            Borrowing quite a lot from Roman, the following tries to compute the extremal points of the Wigner-Seitz cells and applies ConvexHullMesh to the result in order to obtain the precise polyhedron.



            a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
            a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
            a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;
            B = b1, b2, b3 = 2 π*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];
            pts = Flatten[Table[b1, b2, b3.n1, n2, n3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1], 2];
            G = NearestNeighborGraph[pts, VertexCoordinates -> pts];
            neighbors = Rest[VertexOutComponent[G, 0, 0, 0, 1]];
            rhs = MapThread[Dot, neighbors, neighbors]/2;
            subsets = Subsets[Range[Length[neighbors]], 3];

            q = Module[A, x,
            Table[
            A = neighbors[[s]];
            If[Det[A] != 0,
            x = LinearSolve[A, rhs[[s]]];
            If[And @@ Thread[neighbors.x <= rhs], x, Nothing],
            Nothing
            ],
            s, subsets]
            ];
            R = ConvexHullMesh[q]


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$




















              1












              $begingroup$

              The other answers are great and very enlightening, I had already found a brute force solution but I took elements of both @Henrik Schumacher and @Roman's answers to produce this nice minimal one for what I wanted. I think both of their answers are better in that they provide more functionality.



              d = 2 Pi;
              a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
              a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
              a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;
              b1, b2, b3 = d*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];
              reciplattice =
              Select[Flatten[
              Table[n1 b1 + n2 b2 + n3 b3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1],
              2], 0 < Norm[#] <= 2 d &];
              region = And@@FullSimplify[(x, y, z - (#/2)).# <= 0 & /@ reciplattice]


              And plotting it with



              e = d + 0.1;
              fbz = RegionPlot3D[region, x, -e, e, y, -e, e, z, -e, e,
              PlotPoints -> 60]


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













                Your Answer








                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "387"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: false,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: null,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198588%2ffind-the-3d-region-containing-the-origin-bounded-by-given-planes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes








                3 Answers
                3






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                3












                $begingroup$

                Unfortunately, VoronoiMesh does not work in 3D. So we do it manually.



                the crystal lattice vectors:



                a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;


                the reciprocal lattice vectors: (Inverse is easier than using cross products, but ultimately the same thing)



                B = b1, b2, b3 = 2π*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];


                an inequality defining the perpendicular bisecting plane of a reciprocal lattice point v:



                pbp[0, 0, 0, r_] = True;
                pbp[v_, r_] := v.r/v.v <= 1/2


                make a list of such inequalities, And them, and simplify: (here you may have to go to larger s to get all the constraints, as you said)



                With[s = 1,
                WS[x_, y_, z_] = FullSimplify[
                And @@ Flatten[Table[pbp[n1,n2,n3.B, x,y,z], n1,-s,s, n2,-s,s, n3,-s,s]]]]



                -2 π <= y + z <= 2 π && z <= 2 π + x && x <= 2 π + z && y <= 2 π + x && x <= 2 π + y && -2 π <= x + z <= 2 π && z <= 2 π + y && y <= 2 π + z && -2 π <= x + y <= 2 π




                make a 3D plot of the Wigner-Seitz cell: (use more PlotPoints to make it prettier)



                With[t = 2π,
                RegionPlot3D[WS[x, y, z], x, -t, t, y, -t, t, z, -t, t]]


                enter image description here



                You can also check if a point is in the Wigner-Seitz cell or not:



                WS[0.1, 0.2, 0.3]
                (* True *)
                WS[3.1, 3.2, 0.3]
                (* False *)





                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  Unfortunately, VoronoiMesh does not work in 3D. So we do it manually.



                  the crystal lattice vectors:



                  a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                  a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                  a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;


                  the reciprocal lattice vectors: (Inverse is easier than using cross products, but ultimately the same thing)



                  B = b1, b2, b3 = 2π*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];


                  an inequality defining the perpendicular bisecting plane of a reciprocal lattice point v:



                  pbp[0, 0, 0, r_] = True;
                  pbp[v_, r_] := v.r/v.v <= 1/2


                  make a list of such inequalities, And them, and simplify: (here you may have to go to larger s to get all the constraints, as you said)



                  With[s = 1,
                  WS[x_, y_, z_] = FullSimplify[
                  And @@ Flatten[Table[pbp[n1,n2,n3.B, x,y,z], n1,-s,s, n2,-s,s, n3,-s,s]]]]



                  -2 π <= y + z <= 2 π && z <= 2 π + x && x <= 2 π + z && y <= 2 π + x && x <= 2 π + y && -2 π <= x + z <= 2 π && z <= 2 π + y && y <= 2 π + z && -2 π <= x + y <= 2 π




                  make a 3D plot of the Wigner-Seitz cell: (use more PlotPoints to make it prettier)



                  With[t = 2π,
                  RegionPlot3D[WS[x, y, z], x, -t, t, y, -t, t, z, -t, t]]


                  enter image description here



                  You can also check if a point is in the Wigner-Seitz cell or not:



                  WS[0.1, 0.2, 0.3]
                  (* True *)
                  WS[3.1, 3.2, 0.3]
                  (* False *)





                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    Unfortunately, VoronoiMesh does not work in 3D. So we do it manually.



                    the crystal lattice vectors:



                    a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                    a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                    a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;


                    the reciprocal lattice vectors: (Inverse is easier than using cross products, but ultimately the same thing)



                    B = b1, b2, b3 = 2π*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];


                    an inequality defining the perpendicular bisecting plane of a reciprocal lattice point v:



                    pbp[0, 0, 0, r_] = True;
                    pbp[v_, r_] := v.r/v.v <= 1/2


                    make a list of such inequalities, And them, and simplify: (here you may have to go to larger s to get all the constraints, as you said)



                    With[s = 1,
                    WS[x_, y_, z_] = FullSimplify[
                    And @@ Flatten[Table[pbp[n1,n2,n3.B, x,y,z], n1,-s,s, n2,-s,s, n3,-s,s]]]]



                    -2 π <= y + z <= 2 π && z <= 2 π + x && x <= 2 π + z && y <= 2 π + x && x <= 2 π + y && -2 π <= x + z <= 2 π && z <= 2 π + y && y <= 2 π + z && -2 π <= x + y <= 2 π




                    make a 3D plot of the Wigner-Seitz cell: (use more PlotPoints to make it prettier)



                    With[t = 2π,
                    RegionPlot3D[WS[x, y, z], x, -t, t, y, -t, t, z, -t, t]]


                    enter image description here



                    You can also check if a point is in the Wigner-Seitz cell or not:



                    WS[0.1, 0.2, 0.3]
                    (* True *)
                    WS[3.1, 3.2, 0.3]
                    (* False *)





                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    Unfortunately, VoronoiMesh does not work in 3D. So we do it manually.



                    the crystal lattice vectors:



                    a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                    a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                    a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;


                    the reciprocal lattice vectors: (Inverse is easier than using cross products, but ultimately the same thing)



                    B = b1, b2, b3 = 2π*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];


                    an inequality defining the perpendicular bisecting plane of a reciprocal lattice point v:



                    pbp[0, 0, 0, r_] = True;
                    pbp[v_, r_] := v.r/v.v <= 1/2


                    make a list of such inequalities, And them, and simplify: (here you may have to go to larger s to get all the constraints, as you said)



                    With[s = 1,
                    WS[x_, y_, z_] = FullSimplify[
                    And @@ Flatten[Table[pbp[n1,n2,n3.B, x,y,z], n1,-s,s, n2,-s,s, n3,-s,s]]]]



                    -2 π <= y + z <= 2 π && z <= 2 π + x && x <= 2 π + z && y <= 2 π + x && x <= 2 π + y && -2 π <= x + z <= 2 π && z <= 2 π + y && y <= 2 π + z && -2 π <= x + y <= 2 π




                    make a 3D plot of the Wigner-Seitz cell: (use more PlotPoints to make it prettier)



                    With[t = 2π,
                    RegionPlot3D[WS[x, y, z], x, -t, t, y, -t, t, z, -t, t]]


                    enter image description here



                    You can also check if a point is in the Wigner-Seitz cell or not:



                    WS[0.1, 0.2, 0.3]
                    (* True *)
                    WS[3.1, 3.2, 0.3]
                    (* False *)






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited 4 hours ago

























                    answered 4 hours ago









                    RomanRoman

                    8,53511238




                    8,53511238





















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        It is really unfortunate that we don't have a 3D implementation of VoronoiMesh.



                        Borrowing quite a lot from Roman, the following tries to compute the extremal points of the Wigner-Seitz cells and applies ConvexHullMesh to the result in order to obtain the precise polyhedron.



                        a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                        a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                        a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;
                        B = b1, b2, b3 = 2 π*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];
                        pts = Flatten[Table[b1, b2, b3.n1, n2, n3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1], 2];
                        G = NearestNeighborGraph[pts, VertexCoordinates -> pts];
                        neighbors = Rest[VertexOutComponent[G, 0, 0, 0, 1]];
                        rhs = MapThread[Dot, neighbors, neighbors]/2;
                        subsets = Subsets[Range[Length[neighbors]], 3];

                        q = Module[A, x,
                        Table[
                        A = neighbors[[s]];
                        If[Det[A] != 0,
                        x = LinearSolve[A, rhs[[s]]];
                        If[And @@ Thread[neighbors.x <= rhs], x, Nothing],
                        Nothing
                        ],
                        s, subsets]
                        ];
                        R = ConvexHullMesh[q]


                        enter image description here






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          It is really unfortunate that we don't have a 3D implementation of VoronoiMesh.



                          Borrowing quite a lot from Roman, the following tries to compute the extremal points of the Wigner-Seitz cells and applies ConvexHullMesh to the result in order to obtain the precise polyhedron.



                          a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                          a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                          a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;
                          B = b1, b2, b3 = 2 π*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];
                          pts = Flatten[Table[b1, b2, b3.n1, n2, n3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1], 2];
                          G = NearestNeighborGraph[pts, VertexCoordinates -> pts];
                          neighbors = Rest[VertexOutComponent[G, 0, 0, 0, 1]];
                          rhs = MapThread[Dot, neighbors, neighbors]/2;
                          subsets = Subsets[Range[Length[neighbors]], 3];

                          q = Module[A, x,
                          Table[
                          A = neighbors[[s]];
                          If[Det[A] != 0,
                          x = LinearSolve[A, rhs[[s]]];
                          If[And @@ Thread[neighbors.x <= rhs], x, Nothing],
                          Nothing
                          ],
                          s, subsets]
                          ];
                          R = ConvexHullMesh[q]


                          enter image description here






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            It is really unfortunate that we don't have a 3D implementation of VoronoiMesh.



                            Borrowing quite a lot from Roman, the following tries to compute the extremal points of the Wigner-Seitz cells and applies ConvexHullMesh to the result in order to obtain the precise polyhedron.



                            a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                            a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                            a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;
                            B = b1, b2, b3 = 2 π*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];
                            pts = Flatten[Table[b1, b2, b3.n1, n2, n3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1], 2];
                            G = NearestNeighborGraph[pts, VertexCoordinates -> pts];
                            neighbors = Rest[VertexOutComponent[G, 0, 0, 0, 1]];
                            rhs = MapThread[Dot, neighbors, neighbors]/2;
                            subsets = Subsets[Range[Length[neighbors]], 3];

                            q = Module[A, x,
                            Table[
                            A = neighbors[[s]];
                            If[Det[A] != 0,
                            x = LinearSolve[A, rhs[[s]]];
                            If[And @@ Thread[neighbors.x <= rhs], x, Nothing],
                            Nothing
                            ],
                            s, subsets]
                            ];
                            R = ConvexHullMesh[q]


                            enter image description here






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            It is really unfortunate that we don't have a 3D implementation of VoronoiMesh.



                            Borrowing quite a lot from Roman, the following tries to compute the extremal points of the Wigner-Seitz cells and applies ConvexHullMesh to the result in order to obtain the precise polyhedron.



                            a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                            a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                            a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;
                            B = b1, b2, b3 = 2 π*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];
                            pts = Flatten[Table[b1, b2, b3.n1, n2, n3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1], 2];
                            G = NearestNeighborGraph[pts, VertexCoordinates -> pts];
                            neighbors = Rest[VertexOutComponent[G, 0, 0, 0, 1]];
                            rhs = MapThread[Dot, neighbors, neighbors]/2;
                            subsets = Subsets[Range[Length[neighbors]], 3];

                            q = Module[A, x,
                            Table[
                            A = neighbors[[s]];
                            If[Det[A] != 0,
                            x = LinearSolve[A, rhs[[s]]];
                            If[And @@ Thread[neighbors.x <= rhs], x, Nothing],
                            Nothing
                            ],
                            s, subsets]
                            ];
                            R = ConvexHullMesh[q]


                            enter image description here







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 3 hours ago









                            Henrik SchumacherHenrik Schumacher

                            62.5k586175




                            62.5k586175





















                                1












                                $begingroup$

                                The other answers are great and very enlightening, I had already found a brute force solution but I took elements of both @Henrik Schumacher and @Roman's answers to produce this nice minimal one for what I wanted. I think both of their answers are better in that they provide more functionality.



                                d = 2 Pi;
                                a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                                a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                                a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;
                                b1, b2, b3 = d*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];
                                reciplattice =
                                Select[Flatten[
                                Table[n1 b1 + n2 b2 + n3 b3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1],
                                2], 0 < Norm[#] <= 2 d &];
                                region = And@@FullSimplify[(x, y, z - (#/2)).# <= 0 & /@ reciplattice]


                                And plotting it with



                                e = d + 0.1;
                                fbz = RegionPlot3D[region, x, -e, e, y, -e, e, z, -e, e,
                                PlotPoints -> 60]


                                enter image description here






                                share|improve this answer









                                $endgroup$

















                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  The other answers are great and very enlightening, I had already found a brute force solution but I took elements of both @Henrik Schumacher and @Roman's answers to produce this nice minimal one for what I wanted. I think both of their answers are better in that they provide more functionality.



                                  d = 2 Pi;
                                  a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                                  a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                                  a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;
                                  b1, b2, b3 = d*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];
                                  reciplattice =
                                  Select[Flatten[
                                  Table[n1 b1 + n2 b2 + n3 b3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1],
                                  2], 0 < Norm[#] <= 2 d &];
                                  region = And@@FullSimplify[(x, y, z - (#/2)).# <= 0 & /@ reciplattice]


                                  And plotting it with



                                  e = d + 0.1;
                                  fbz = RegionPlot3D[region, x, -e, e, y, -e, e, z, -e, e,
                                  PlotPoints -> 60]


                                  enter image description here






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$















                                    1












                                    1








                                    1





                                    $begingroup$

                                    The other answers are great and very enlightening, I had already found a brute force solution but I took elements of both @Henrik Schumacher and @Roman's answers to produce this nice minimal one for what I wanted. I think both of their answers are better in that they provide more functionality.



                                    d = 2 Pi;
                                    a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                                    a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                                    a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;
                                    b1, b2, b3 = d*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];
                                    reciplattice =
                                    Select[Flatten[
                                    Table[n1 b1 + n2 b2 + n3 b3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1],
                                    2], 0 < Norm[#] <= 2 d &];
                                    region = And@@FullSimplify[(x, y, z - (#/2)).# <= 0 & /@ reciplattice]


                                    And plotting it with



                                    e = d + 0.1;
                                    fbz = RegionPlot3D[region, x, -e, e, y, -e, e, z, -e, e,
                                    PlotPoints -> 60]


                                    enter image description here






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$



                                    The other answers are great and very enlightening, I had already found a brute force solution but I took elements of both @Henrik Schumacher and @Roman's answers to produce this nice minimal one for what I wanted. I think both of their answers are better in that they provide more functionality.



                                    d = 2 Pi;
                                    a1 = -1, 1, 1/2;
                                    a2 = 1, -1, 1/2;
                                    a3 = 1, 1, -1/2;
                                    b1, b2, b3 = d*Inverse[Transpose[a1, a2, a3]];
                                    reciplattice =
                                    Select[Flatten[
                                    Table[n1 b1 + n2 b2 + n3 b3, n1, -1, 1, n2, -1, 1, n3, -1, 1],
                                    2], 0 < Norm[#] <= 2 d &];
                                    region = And@@FullSimplify[(x, y, z - (#/2)).# <= 0 & /@ reciplattice]


                                    And plotting it with



                                    e = d + 0.1;
                                    fbz = RegionPlot3D[region, x, -e, e, y, -e, e, z, -e, e,
                                    PlotPoints -> 60]


                                    enter image description here







                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 3 hours ago









                                    KaiKai

                                    55719




                                    55719



























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded
















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid


                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                        Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198588%2ffind-the-3d-region-containing-the-origin-bounded-by-given-planes%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                                        Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                                        19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу