Why do the keys in the circle of fifths have the pattern of accidentals that they do?Why is music theory built so tightly around the C Major scale?Is there a name for this phenomenon in the circle of fifths?How are keys in the circle of fifths related?Are the I IV V chords the heart of music and harmony?Are there geometric symmetries in musical harmonics?Learning the Circle of FIfthsIs the circle of fifths misnamed?Is this pattern between Primary and Secondary chord notes important?E# note in the D# Major scale. What does it mean?Why does the circle of fifths only show some notes that are enharmonically equivalent?

Can a US President have someone sent to prison?

I hit a pipe with a mower and now it won't turn

Being paid less than a "junior" colleague

Can I ask to speak to my future colleagues before accepting an offer?

Why are there so many religions and gods?

Was it really unprofessional of me to leave without asking for a raise first?

What does Mildred mean by this line in Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri?

Do the 26 richest billionaires own as much wealth as the poorest 3.8 billion people?

Do space suits measure "methane" levels or other biological gases?

The Confused Alien

One folder two different locations on ubuntu 18.04

Most importants new papers in computational complexity

Should I report a leak of confidential HR information?

Details of video memory access arbitration in Space Invaders

How exactly is a normal force exerted, at the molecular level?

Can a police officer film me on their personal device in my own home?

How do I tell the reader that my character is autistic in Fantasy?

Understanding Lasso Regression's sparsity geometrically

Is there a nice way to assign std::minmax(a, b) to std::tie(a, b)?

Automatically convert a number to use the correct SI unit prefix

Can a single server be associated with multiple domains?

What is the highest number of sneak attacks that a Pure/High Level Rogue (Level 17+) can make in one round?

Can I travel from Germany to England alone as an unaccompanied minor?

Is there a way for presidents to legally extend their terms beyond the maximum of four years?



Why do the keys in the circle of fifths have the pattern of accidentals that they do?


Why is music theory built so tightly around the C Major scale?Is there a name for this phenomenon in the circle of fifths?How are keys in the circle of fifths related?Are the I IV V chords the heart of music and harmony?Are there geometric symmetries in musical harmonics?Learning the Circle of FIfthsIs the circle of fifths misnamed?Is this pattern between Primary and Secondary chord notes important?E# note in the D# Major scale. What does it mean?Why does the circle of fifths only show some notes that are enharmonically equivalent?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















I'm attempting to fully understand the circle of fifths, and I noticed that in the clockwise direction, the sharps are added in their own circle of fifths starting at F. I'm wondering why this pattern appears; I've tried looking at a piano and seeing if there is any special change in the pattern of black keys that happens when you go up a fifth, but I haven't found anything. To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale, but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.










share|improve this question







New contributor



Vityou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    3















    I'm attempting to fully understand the circle of fifths, and I noticed that in the clockwise direction, the sharps are added in their own circle of fifths starting at F. I'm wondering why this pattern appears; I've tried looking at a piano and seeing if there is any special change in the pattern of black keys that happens when you go up a fifth, but I haven't found anything. To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale, but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.










    share|improve this question







    New contributor



    Vityou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      3












      3








      3








      I'm attempting to fully understand the circle of fifths, and I noticed that in the clockwise direction, the sharps are added in their own circle of fifths starting at F. I'm wondering why this pattern appears; I've tried looking at a piano and seeing if there is any special change in the pattern of black keys that happens when you go up a fifth, but I haven't found anything. To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale, but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      Vityou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I'm attempting to fully understand the circle of fifths, and I noticed that in the clockwise direction, the sharps are added in their own circle of fifths starting at F. I'm wondering why this pattern appears; I've tried looking at a piano and seeing if there is any special change in the pattern of black keys that happens when you go up a fifth, but I haven't found anything. To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale, but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.







      theory intervals accidentals






      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      Vityou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor



      Vityou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor



      Vityou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 9 hours ago









      VityouVityou

      162 bronze badges




      162 bronze badges




      New contributor



      Vityou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      Vityou is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3















          To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale,




          That is exactly the reason. When the diatonic scale is transposed to start on tonics other than C (or A for relative minor) you must make adjustments with sharps/flats to maintain the diatonic pattern.




          ...but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.




          I think you may be misunderstanding the key signature circle of fifths. The tonics are arranged in fifths to show the alteration of sharps/flats one by one. It's a circle of key signatures arranged in fifths.



          You may be mistaking the key signature circle of fifths for a chord progression.



          There is a circle of fifths chord progression but it moves by diatonic fifths through the seven diatonic chords.



          They are similar, but not the same thing.




          I'm not sure this is what your asking about but...



          The diatonic major scale is two tetrachords (series of four tones), those two tetrachords are major consisting of two whole steps followed by a half step. The starting notes for the two tetrachords are a perfect fifth apart. So, when we start on C...



          [C D E F ] ...is a major tetra chord and gives us the first half of the scale, then go up a perfect fifth for the second major tetrachord and the second half of the scale...



          [G A B C ] ...the second tetrachord is major, so we do not need to add sharps.



          The full scale is [C D E F ][G A B C ].



          Now we go up a perfect fifth to start the next scale, and so start on G...



          [G A B C ] ...for the first half of the scale, go up a perfect fifth for the second half...



          [D E F A ] ...that tetrachord is minor! we need to make it major with F#. Notice that it is the third we changed.



          The full scale is [G A B C ][D E F# G ].



          Now we go up a perfect fifth to start the next scale - we will will keep the previous sharps added - and start on D...



          [D E F# G ] ...is our first half major tetrachord and we go up a perfect fifth for the second half...



          [A B C D ] ...this tetrachord is also minor, so we put a sharp on the third and use C#...



          The full scale is [D E F# G ][A B C# D ].



          If you keep following this pattern of moving up to the next tetrachord by a perfect fifth, and maintain the sharps added in the previous stages, you only need to add one sharp to the next new tetrachord - to alter the third of the tetrachord - to change it from minor to major.



          I hope this helps illustrate why moving up by perfect fifths results in sharps added one by one.






          share|improve this answer
































            2















            To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale.




            This is exactly correct, and there's not much more to it. The major scale requires the seventh scale degree to be a half-step below the tonic, as with C major. When you build a major scale on G, you have to raise the seventh scale degree, which is F#. When you go up a fifth to build a major scale on D, you keep that F# as the third, and you have to raise the seventh scale degree from C to C#. When you go up a fifth to A major, you again have to raise the seventh scale degree from G to G#.




            but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.




            It's because it's always the seventh scale degree of the corresponding major scale. Just like the tonic of each scale, the seventh degree is a fifth higher than the seventh degree of the preceding scale in the circle.






            share|improve this answer






























              0














              As the first answer indicates there is a specific pattern to the major scale. It is built from whole and half step intervals, specifically



              (W - W - H) - W - (W - W - H)



              The parentheses are placed around a smaller grouping of intervals called a tetrachord (a 4 note sequence). Notice that the same exact tetra chord appears twice in the construction of the major scale. This means that scales that differ by a 5th have a lot of common tones and are sometimes referred to in music theory as being compatible keys.



              I disagree with some of the statements made in the previous answer. While it is somewhat true that the structure of the major scale is a coincidence the relation between different keys is not. You can't just stack them in any order are see a simple pattern. Only the stacking in 5ths (or 4ths) will reveal this pattern and it is related to the structure of the scale using tetrachords.



              As for changing key, this construction makes it very easy. To move up a 5th from where you are all you have to do is augment the 4th of the key you are in. Example: Modulate from C to G, raise the F. To modulate down a 5th all you need to do is drop the 7th of the key you are in. Example: from C to F, drop the B to Bb. On an instrument like guitar this makes reading key changes very easy without moving position by several frets. Now you may wonder how this helps if a key modulates to the relative minor third above the current key. Perhaps it doesn't, but a lot classical music (and this is classical music theory) makes use of compatible keys in modulation (even a lot of modern music does too). So this is a common type of modulation and it helps to memorize it. In Jazz there are other types of modulations that make use of modern harmony ideas. A few that come to mind are the Coltrane and Parker cycles, that modulate by thirds instead of 5ths and 4ths. Another is Pat Martino's way of seeing multiple keys as connected by the diminished form.



              If you abandon the major scale as the building block of melody you will lose the circle of 5ths connection, it may be replaced by another circle.






              share|improve this answer























              • My answer does not use the word "coincidence." What statement do you disagree with?

                – phoog
                5 hours ago













              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "240"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              Vityou is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f86169%2fwhy-do-the-keys-in-the-circle-of-fifths-have-the-pattern-of-accidentals-that-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3















              To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale,




              That is exactly the reason. When the diatonic scale is transposed to start on tonics other than C (or A for relative minor) you must make adjustments with sharps/flats to maintain the diatonic pattern.




              ...but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.




              I think you may be misunderstanding the key signature circle of fifths. The tonics are arranged in fifths to show the alteration of sharps/flats one by one. It's a circle of key signatures arranged in fifths.



              You may be mistaking the key signature circle of fifths for a chord progression.



              There is a circle of fifths chord progression but it moves by diatonic fifths through the seven diatonic chords.



              They are similar, but not the same thing.




              I'm not sure this is what your asking about but...



              The diatonic major scale is two tetrachords (series of four tones), those two tetrachords are major consisting of two whole steps followed by a half step. The starting notes for the two tetrachords are a perfect fifth apart. So, when we start on C...



              [C D E F ] ...is a major tetra chord and gives us the first half of the scale, then go up a perfect fifth for the second major tetrachord and the second half of the scale...



              [G A B C ] ...the second tetrachord is major, so we do not need to add sharps.



              The full scale is [C D E F ][G A B C ].



              Now we go up a perfect fifth to start the next scale, and so start on G...



              [G A B C ] ...for the first half of the scale, go up a perfect fifth for the second half...



              [D E F A ] ...that tetrachord is minor! we need to make it major with F#. Notice that it is the third we changed.



              The full scale is [G A B C ][D E F# G ].



              Now we go up a perfect fifth to start the next scale - we will will keep the previous sharps added - and start on D...



              [D E F# G ] ...is our first half major tetrachord and we go up a perfect fifth for the second half...



              [A B C D ] ...this tetrachord is also minor, so we put a sharp on the third and use C#...



              The full scale is [D E F# G ][A B C# D ].



              If you keep following this pattern of moving up to the next tetrachord by a perfect fifth, and maintain the sharps added in the previous stages, you only need to add one sharp to the next new tetrachord - to alter the third of the tetrachord - to change it from minor to major.



              I hope this helps illustrate why moving up by perfect fifths results in sharps added one by one.






              share|improve this answer





























                3















                To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale,




                That is exactly the reason. When the diatonic scale is transposed to start on tonics other than C (or A for relative minor) you must make adjustments with sharps/flats to maintain the diatonic pattern.




                ...but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.




                I think you may be misunderstanding the key signature circle of fifths. The tonics are arranged in fifths to show the alteration of sharps/flats one by one. It's a circle of key signatures arranged in fifths.



                You may be mistaking the key signature circle of fifths for a chord progression.



                There is a circle of fifths chord progression but it moves by diatonic fifths through the seven diatonic chords.



                They are similar, but not the same thing.




                I'm not sure this is what your asking about but...



                The diatonic major scale is two tetrachords (series of four tones), those two tetrachords are major consisting of two whole steps followed by a half step. The starting notes for the two tetrachords are a perfect fifth apart. So, when we start on C...



                [C D E F ] ...is a major tetra chord and gives us the first half of the scale, then go up a perfect fifth for the second major tetrachord and the second half of the scale...



                [G A B C ] ...the second tetrachord is major, so we do not need to add sharps.



                The full scale is [C D E F ][G A B C ].



                Now we go up a perfect fifth to start the next scale, and so start on G...



                [G A B C ] ...for the first half of the scale, go up a perfect fifth for the second half...



                [D E F A ] ...that tetrachord is minor! we need to make it major with F#. Notice that it is the third we changed.



                The full scale is [G A B C ][D E F# G ].



                Now we go up a perfect fifth to start the next scale - we will will keep the previous sharps added - and start on D...



                [D E F# G ] ...is our first half major tetrachord and we go up a perfect fifth for the second half...



                [A B C D ] ...this tetrachord is also minor, so we put a sharp on the third and use C#...



                The full scale is [D E F# G ][A B C# D ].



                If you keep following this pattern of moving up to the next tetrachord by a perfect fifth, and maintain the sharps added in the previous stages, you only need to add one sharp to the next new tetrachord - to alter the third of the tetrachord - to change it from minor to major.



                I hope this helps illustrate why moving up by perfect fifths results in sharps added one by one.






                share|improve this answer



























                  3












                  3








                  3








                  To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale,




                  That is exactly the reason. When the diatonic scale is transposed to start on tonics other than C (or A for relative minor) you must make adjustments with sharps/flats to maintain the diatonic pattern.




                  ...but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.




                  I think you may be misunderstanding the key signature circle of fifths. The tonics are arranged in fifths to show the alteration of sharps/flats one by one. It's a circle of key signatures arranged in fifths.



                  You may be mistaking the key signature circle of fifths for a chord progression.



                  There is a circle of fifths chord progression but it moves by diatonic fifths through the seven diatonic chords.



                  They are similar, but not the same thing.




                  I'm not sure this is what your asking about but...



                  The diatonic major scale is two tetrachords (series of four tones), those two tetrachords are major consisting of two whole steps followed by a half step. The starting notes for the two tetrachords are a perfect fifth apart. So, when we start on C...



                  [C D E F ] ...is a major tetra chord and gives us the first half of the scale, then go up a perfect fifth for the second major tetrachord and the second half of the scale...



                  [G A B C ] ...the second tetrachord is major, so we do not need to add sharps.



                  The full scale is [C D E F ][G A B C ].



                  Now we go up a perfect fifth to start the next scale, and so start on G...



                  [G A B C ] ...for the first half of the scale, go up a perfect fifth for the second half...



                  [D E F A ] ...that tetrachord is minor! we need to make it major with F#. Notice that it is the third we changed.



                  The full scale is [G A B C ][D E F# G ].



                  Now we go up a perfect fifth to start the next scale - we will will keep the previous sharps added - and start on D...



                  [D E F# G ] ...is our first half major tetrachord and we go up a perfect fifth for the second half...



                  [A B C D ] ...this tetrachord is also minor, so we put a sharp on the third and use C#...



                  The full scale is [D E F# G ][A B C# D ].



                  If you keep following this pattern of moving up to the next tetrachord by a perfect fifth, and maintain the sharps added in the previous stages, you only need to add one sharp to the next new tetrachord - to alter the third of the tetrachord - to change it from minor to major.



                  I hope this helps illustrate why moving up by perfect fifths results in sharps added one by one.






                  share|improve this answer
















                  To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale,




                  That is exactly the reason. When the diatonic scale is transposed to start on tonics other than C (or A for relative minor) you must make adjustments with sharps/flats to maintain the diatonic pattern.




                  ...but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.




                  I think you may be misunderstanding the key signature circle of fifths. The tonics are arranged in fifths to show the alteration of sharps/flats one by one. It's a circle of key signatures arranged in fifths.



                  You may be mistaking the key signature circle of fifths for a chord progression.



                  There is a circle of fifths chord progression but it moves by diatonic fifths through the seven diatonic chords.



                  They are similar, but not the same thing.




                  I'm not sure this is what your asking about but...



                  The diatonic major scale is two tetrachords (series of four tones), those two tetrachords are major consisting of two whole steps followed by a half step. The starting notes for the two tetrachords are a perfect fifth apart. So, when we start on C...



                  [C D E F ] ...is a major tetra chord and gives us the first half of the scale, then go up a perfect fifth for the second major tetrachord and the second half of the scale...



                  [G A B C ] ...the second tetrachord is major, so we do not need to add sharps.



                  The full scale is [C D E F ][G A B C ].



                  Now we go up a perfect fifth to start the next scale, and so start on G...



                  [G A B C ] ...for the first half of the scale, go up a perfect fifth for the second half...



                  [D E F A ] ...that tetrachord is minor! we need to make it major with F#. Notice that it is the third we changed.



                  The full scale is [G A B C ][D E F# G ].



                  Now we go up a perfect fifth to start the next scale - we will will keep the previous sharps added - and start on D...



                  [D E F# G ] ...is our first half major tetrachord and we go up a perfect fifth for the second half...



                  [A B C D ] ...this tetrachord is also minor, so we put a sharp on the third and use C#...



                  The full scale is [D E F# G ][A B C# D ].



                  If you keep following this pattern of moving up to the next tetrachord by a perfect fifth, and maintain the sharps added in the previous stages, you only need to add one sharp to the next new tetrachord - to alter the third of the tetrachord - to change it from minor to major.



                  I hope this helps illustrate why moving up by perfect fifths results in sharps added one by one.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 6 hours ago

























                  answered 7 hours ago









                  Michael CurtisMichael Curtis

                  15.2k10 silver badges51 bronze badges




                  15.2k10 silver badges51 bronze badges























                      2















                      To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale.




                      This is exactly correct, and there's not much more to it. The major scale requires the seventh scale degree to be a half-step below the tonic, as with C major. When you build a major scale on G, you have to raise the seventh scale degree, which is F#. When you go up a fifth to build a major scale on D, you keep that F# as the third, and you have to raise the seventh scale degree from C to C#. When you go up a fifth to A major, you again have to raise the seventh scale degree from G to G#.




                      but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.




                      It's because it's always the seventh scale degree of the corresponding major scale. Just like the tonic of each scale, the seventh degree is a fifth higher than the seventh degree of the preceding scale in the circle.






                      share|improve this answer



























                        2















                        To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale.




                        This is exactly correct, and there's not much more to it. The major scale requires the seventh scale degree to be a half-step below the tonic, as with C major. When you build a major scale on G, you have to raise the seventh scale degree, which is F#. When you go up a fifth to build a major scale on D, you keep that F# as the third, and you have to raise the seventh scale degree from C to C#. When you go up a fifth to A major, you again have to raise the seventh scale degree from G to G#.




                        but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.




                        It's because it's always the seventh scale degree of the corresponding major scale. Just like the tonic of each scale, the seventh degree is a fifth higher than the seventh degree of the preceding scale in the circle.






                        share|improve this answer

























                          2












                          2








                          2








                          To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale.




                          This is exactly correct, and there's not much more to it. The major scale requires the seventh scale degree to be a half-step below the tonic, as with C major. When you build a major scale on G, you have to raise the seventh scale degree, which is F#. When you go up a fifth to build a major scale on D, you keep that F# as the third, and you have to raise the seventh scale degree from C to C#. When you go up a fifth to A major, you again have to raise the seventh scale degree from G to G#.




                          but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.




                          It's because it's always the seventh scale degree of the corresponding major scale. Just like the tonic of each scale, the seventh degree is a fifth higher than the seventh degree of the preceding scale in the circle.






                          share|improve this answer














                          To me it just seems that each key just happens to have those sharps due to the pattern of the major scale.




                          This is exactly correct, and there's not much more to it. The major scale requires the seventh scale degree to be a half-step below the tonic, as with C major. When you build a major scale on G, you have to raise the seventh scale degree, which is F#. When you go up a fifth to build a major scale on D, you keep that F# as the third, and you have to raise the seventh scale degree from C to C#. When you go up a fifth to A major, you again have to raise the seventh scale degree from G to G#.




                          but I'm wondering what the underlying reason is that the sharps are added around the circle of fifths in their own little circle of fifths.




                          It's because it's always the seventh scale degree of the corresponding major scale. Just like the tonic of each scale, the seventh degree is a fifth higher than the seventh degree of the preceding scale in the circle.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 8 hours ago









                          phoogphoog

                          1,2476 silver badges9 bronze badges




                          1,2476 silver badges9 bronze badges





















                              0














                              As the first answer indicates there is a specific pattern to the major scale. It is built from whole and half step intervals, specifically



                              (W - W - H) - W - (W - W - H)



                              The parentheses are placed around a smaller grouping of intervals called a tetrachord (a 4 note sequence). Notice that the same exact tetra chord appears twice in the construction of the major scale. This means that scales that differ by a 5th have a lot of common tones and are sometimes referred to in music theory as being compatible keys.



                              I disagree with some of the statements made in the previous answer. While it is somewhat true that the structure of the major scale is a coincidence the relation between different keys is not. You can't just stack them in any order are see a simple pattern. Only the stacking in 5ths (or 4ths) will reveal this pattern and it is related to the structure of the scale using tetrachords.



                              As for changing key, this construction makes it very easy. To move up a 5th from where you are all you have to do is augment the 4th of the key you are in. Example: Modulate from C to G, raise the F. To modulate down a 5th all you need to do is drop the 7th of the key you are in. Example: from C to F, drop the B to Bb. On an instrument like guitar this makes reading key changes very easy without moving position by several frets. Now you may wonder how this helps if a key modulates to the relative minor third above the current key. Perhaps it doesn't, but a lot classical music (and this is classical music theory) makes use of compatible keys in modulation (even a lot of modern music does too). So this is a common type of modulation and it helps to memorize it. In Jazz there are other types of modulations that make use of modern harmony ideas. A few that come to mind are the Coltrane and Parker cycles, that modulate by thirds instead of 5ths and 4ths. Another is Pat Martino's way of seeing multiple keys as connected by the diminished form.



                              If you abandon the major scale as the building block of melody you will lose the circle of 5ths connection, it may be replaced by another circle.






                              share|improve this answer























                              • My answer does not use the word "coincidence." What statement do you disagree with?

                                – phoog
                                5 hours ago















                              0














                              As the first answer indicates there is a specific pattern to the major scale. It is built from whole and half step intervals, specifically



                              (W - W - H) - W - (W - W - H)



                              The parentheses are placed around a smaller grouping of intervals called a tetrachord (a 4 note sequence). Notice that the same exact tetra chord appears twice in the construction of the major scale. This means that scales that differ by a 5th have a lot of common tones and are sometimes referred to in music theory as being compatible keys.



                              I disagree with some of the statements made in the previous answer. While it is somewhat true that the structure of the major scale is a coincidence the relation between different keys is not. You can't just stack them in any order are see a simple pattern. Only the stacking in 5ths (or 4ths) will reveal this pattern and it is related to the structure of the scale using tetrachords.



                              As for changing key, this construction makes it very easy. To move up a 5th from where you are all you have to do is augment the 4th of the key you are in. Example: Modulate from C to G, raise the F. To modulate down a 5th all you need to do is drop the 7th of the key you are in. Example: from C to F, drop the B to Bb. On an instrument like guitar this makes reading key changes very easy without moving position by several frets. Now you may wonder how this helps if a key modulates to the relative minor third above the current key. Perhaps it doesn't, but a lot classical music (and this is classical music theory) makes use of compatible keys in modulation (even a lot of modern music does too). So this is a common type of modulation and it helps to memorize it. In Jazz there are other types of modulations that make use of modern harmony ideas. A few that come to mind are the Coltrane and Parker cycles, that modulate by thirds instead of 5ths and 4ths. Another is Pat Martino's way of seeing multiple keys as connected by the diminished form.



                              If you abandon the major scale as the building block of melody you will lose the circle of 5ths connection, it may be replaced by another circle.






                              share|improve this answer























                              • My answer does not use the word "coincidence." What statement do you disagree with?

                                – phoog
                                5 hours ago













                              0












                              0








                              0







                              As the first answer indicates there is a specific pattern to the major scale. It is built from whole and half step intervals, specifically



                              (W - W - H) - W - (W - W - H)



                              The parentheses are placed around a smaller grouping of intervals called a tetrachord (a 4 note sequence). Notice that the same exact tetra chord appears twice in the construction of the major scale. This means that scales that differ by a 5th have a lot of common tones and are sometimes referred to in music theory as being compatible keys.



                              I disagree with some of the statements made in the previous answer. While it is somewhat true that the structure of the major scale is a coincidence the relation between different keys is not. You can't just stack them in any order are see a simple pattern. Only the stacking in 5ths (or 4ths) will reveal this pattern and it is related to the structure of the scale using tetrachords.



                              As for changing key, this construction makes it very easy. To move up a 5th from where you are all you have to do is augment the 4th of the key you are in. Example: Modulate from C to G, raise the F. To modulate down a 5th all you need to do is drop the 7th of the key you are in. Example: from C to F, drop the B to Bb. On an instrument like guitar this makes reading key changes very easy without moving position by several frets. Now you may wonder how this helps if a key modulates to the relative minor third above the current key. Perhaps it doesn't, but a lot classical music (and this is classical music theory) makes use of compatible keys in modulation (even a lot of modern music does too). So this is a common type of modulation and it helps to memorize it. In Jazz there are other types of modulations that make use of modern harmony ideas. A few that come to mind are the Coltrane and Parker cycles, that modulate by thirds instead of 5ths and 4ths. Another is Pat Martino's way of seeing multiple keys as connected by the diminished form.



                              If you abandon the major scale as the building block of melody you will lose the circle of 5ths connection, it may be replaced by another circle.






                              share|improve this answer













                              As the first answer indicates there is a specific pattern to the major scale. It is built from whole and half step intervals, specifically



                              (W - W - H) - W - (W - W - H)



                              The parentheses are placed around a smaller grouping of intervals called a tetrachord (a 4 note sequence). Notice that the same exact tetra chord appears twice in the construction of the major scale. This means that scales that differ by a 5th have a lot of common tones and are sometimes referred to in music theory as being compatible keys.



                              I disagree with some of the statements made in the previous answer. While it is somewhat true that the structure of the major scale is a coincidence the relation between different keys is not. You can't just stack them in any order are see a simple pattern. Only the stacking in 5ths (or 4ths) will reveal this pattern and it is related to the structure of the scale using tetrachords.



                              As for changing key, this construction makes it very easy. To move up a 5th from where you are all you have to do is augment the 4th of the key you are in. Example: Modulate from C to G, raise the F. To modulate down a 5th all you need to do is drop the 7th of the key you are in. Example: from C to F, drop the B to Bb. On an instrument like guitar this makes reading key changes very easy without moving position by several frets. Now you may wonder how this helps if a key modulates to the relative minor third above the current key. Perhaps it doesn't, but a lot classical music (and this is classical music theory) makes use of compatible keys in modulation (even a lot of modern music does too). So this is a common type of modulation and it helps to memorize it. In Jazz there are other types of modulations that make use of modern harmony ideas. A few that come to mind are the Coltrane and Parker cycles, that modulate by thirds instead of 5ths and 4ths. Another is Pat Martino's way of seeing multiple keys as connected by the diminished form.



                              If you abandon the major scale as the building block of melody you will lose the circle of 5ths connection, it may be replaced by another circle.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 8 hours ago









                              ggcgggcg

                              6,1125 silver badges25 bronze badges




                              6,1125 silver badges25 bronze badges












                              • My answer does not use the word "coincidence." What statement do you disagree with?

                                – phoog
                                5 hours ago

















                              • My answer does not use the word "coincidence." What statement do you disagree with?

                                – phoog
                                5 hours ago
















                              My answer does not use the word "coincidence." What statement do you disagree with?

                              – phoog
                              5 hours ago





                              My answer does not use the word "coincidence." What statement do you disagree with?

                              – phoog
                              5 hours ago










                              Vityou is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              Vityou is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              Vityou is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              Vityou is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f86169%2fwhy-do-the-keys-in-the-circle-of-fifths-have-the-pattern-of-accidentals-that-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                              Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                              Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)