A DVR algebra with weird automorphismsDoes there exist a discrete valuation subring $R$ of $K((t))$ ($K$ a number field) of residue characteristic $p$ with $mathrmFrac(R) = K((t))$?When does glueing affine schemes produce affine/separated schemes?When does the normalization have regular special fiber?Is the transcendence degree of a domain over a subfield the same as that of the fraction field of that domain?Are all henselian fields algebraic over complete fields?Are there ever exotic isomorphisms between quotients of F[x]?PAC field : Algebraically closed field :: ? : Henselian local ringHomologue of the Inertia group and of the Frobenius theorem for the group of values of a valuationIs the restriction of a graded automorphism of a polynomial ring to a polynomial subring linearizeable?Valuative criterion to extend morphism of schemesIf $f,g in D[x,y]$ are algebraically dependent over $D$, then $f,g in D[h]$ for some $hin D[x,y]$?Invertibility under base change for the Weyl algebra instead of for the polynomial algebra

A DVR algebra with weird automorphisms


Does there exist a discrete valuation subring $R$ of $K((t))$ ($K$ a number field) of residue characteristic $p$ with $mathrmFrac(R) = K((t))$?When does glueing affine schemes produce affine/separated schemes?When does the normalization have regular special fiber?Is the transcendence degree of a domain over a subfield the same as that of the fraction field of that domain?Are all henselian fields algebraic over complete fields?Are there ever exotic isomorphisms between quotients of F[x]?PAC field : Algebraically closed field :: ? : Henselian local ringHomologue of the Inertia group and of the Frobenius theorem for the group of values of a valuationIs the restriction of a graded automorphism of a polynomial ring to a polynomial subring linearizeable?Valuative criterion to extend morphism of schemesIf $f,g in D[x,y]$ are algebraically dependent over $D$, then $f,g in D[h]$ for some $hin D[x,y]$?Invertibility under base change for the Weyl algebra instead of for the polynomial algebra













2












$begingroup$


Denote by $k$ an algebraically closed field. Can one produce a DVR $A$ over $k$ such that



  • the fraction field of $A$ has an automomorphism not preserving $A$

  • no non-trivial field extension of $k$ maps, as a $k$-algebra, to $A$?

This question is in part inspired by this post (though I guess the connection is not entirely clear, I will try to clarify if this gets responses).



If $k((x))$ has an automorphism not preserving $k[[x]]$, that would mean a positive answer to this question. I do not know if such automorphism exists.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor



gentbent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$
















    2












    $begingroup$


    Denote by $k$ an algebraically closed field. Can one produce a DVR $A$ over $k$ such that



    • the fraction field of $A$ has an automomorphism not preserving $A$

    • no non-trivial field extension of $k$ maps, as a $k$-algebra, to $A$?

    This question is in part inspired by this post (though I guess the connection is not entirely clear, I will try to clarify if this gets responses).



    If $k((x))$ has an automorphism not preserving $k[[x]]$, that would mean a positive answer to this question. I do not know if such automorphism exists.










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor



    gentbent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$














      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      Denote by $k$ an algebraically closed field. Can one produce a DVR $A$ over $k$ such that



      • the fraction field of $A$ has an automomorphism not preserving $A$

      • no non-trivial field extension of $k$ maps, as a $k$-algebra, to $A$?

      This question is in part inspired by this post (though I guess the connection is not entirely clear, I will try to clarify if this gets responses).



      If $k((x))$ has an automorphism not preserving $k[[x]]$, that would mean a positive answer to this question. I do not know if such automorphism exists.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor



      gentbent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      $endgroup$




      Denote by $k$ an algebraically closed field. Can one produce a DVR $A$ over $k$ such that



      • the fraction field of $A$ has an automomorphism not preserving $A$

      • no non-trivial field extension of $k$ maps, as a $k$-algebra, to $A$?

      This question is in part inspired by this post (though I guess the connection is not entirely clear, I will try to clarify if this gets responses).



      If $k((x))$ has an automorphism not preserving $k[[x]]$, that would mean a positive answer to this question. I do not know if such automorphism exists.







      ac.commutative-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor



      gentbent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor



      gentbent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor



      gentbent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      asked 9 hours ago









      gentbentgentbent

      1905 bronze badges




      1905 bronze badges




      New contributor



      gentbent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      New contributor




      gentbent is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          6












          $begingroup$

          If you do not insist on completeness, an easier example seems to be $A=k[x]_(x)subseteq k(x)$. Then the substitution map $f(x)/g(x) mapsto f(x^-1)/g(x^-1)$ defines an automophism of $k(x)$ sending $A$ to its evil twin $k[x^-1]_(x^-1),$ hence not preserving $A$, and no proper overfield of $k$ can map into $A$ since the residue field of $A$ is $k$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            5












            $begingroup$

            Every automorphism of $k((x))$ preserves $k[[x]]$. This argument is adapted from an answer of Will Sawin. Let $V$ be the set of valuations $v : k((x))^times to mathbbZ$ which are $0$ on $k^times$. As usual, we put $v(0) = infty$ for any valuation $v$. I claim that $f in k[[x]]$ if and only if $v(f) geq 0$ for all $v in V$.



            Clearly, if $f notin k[[x]]$, then $v(f)<0$ for the standard valuation $v$.



            In the other direction, let $v in V$. Choose $n$ relatively prime to the characteristic of $k$. Let $f$ be of the form $1+sum_geq 1 a_j x^j$, then $f$ has an $n^j$-th root in $k((x))$ for all $j>0$. So $n^j | v(f)$ and we deduce that $v(f)=0$ for such an $f$. Any $g in k[[x]]$ is the sum of such an $f$ and an element of $k$, so any such $g$ has $v(g) geq 0$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "504"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              gentbent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f336012%2fa-dvr-algebra-with-weird-automorphisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              6












              $begingroup$

              If you do not insist on completeness, an easier example seems to be $A=k[x]_(x)subseteq k(x)$. Then the substitution map $f(x)/g(x) mapsto f(x^-1)/g(x^-1)$ defines an automophism of $k(x)$ sending $A$ to its evil twin $k[x^-1]_(x^-1),$ hence not preserving $A$, and no proper overfield of $k$ can map into $A$ since the residue field of $A$ is $k$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                6












                $begingroup$

                If you do not insist on completeness, an easier example seems to be $A=k[x]_(x)subseteq k(x)$. Then the substitution map $f(x)/g(x) mapsto f(x^-1)/g(x^-1)$ defines an automophism of $k(x)$ sending $A$ to its evil twin $k[x^-1]_(x^-1),$ hence not preserving $A$, and no proper overfield of $k$ can map into $A$ since the residue field of $A$ is $k$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  6












                  6








                  6





                  $begingroup$

                  If you do not insist on completeness, an easier example seems to be $A=k[x]_(x)subseteq k(x)$. Then the substitution map $f(x)/g(x) mapsto f(x^-1)/g(x^-1)$ defines an automophism of $k(x)$ sending $A$ to its evil twin $k[x^-1]_(x^-1),$ hence not preserving $A$, and no proper overfield of $k$ can map into $A$ since the residue field of $A$ is $k$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  If you do not insist on completeness, an easier example seems to be $A=k[x]_(x)subseteq k(x)$. Then the substitution map $f(x)/g(x) mapsto f(x^-1)/g(x^-1)$ defines an automophism of $k(x)$ sending $A$ to its evil twin $k[x^-1]_(x^-1),$ hence not preserving $A$, and no proper overfield of $k$ can map into $A$ since the residue field of $A$ is $k$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 7 hours ago









                  Pavel ČoupekPavel Čoupek

                  3203 silver badges8 bronze badges




                  3203 silver badges8 bronze badges





















                      5












                      $begingroup$

                      Every automorphism of $k((x))$ preserves $k[[x]]$. This argument is adapted from an answer of Will Sawin. Let $V$ be the set of valuations $v : k((x))^times to mathbbZ$ which are $0$ on $k^times$. As usual, we put $v(0) = infty$ for any valuation $v$. I claim that $f in k[[x]]$ if and only if $v(f) geq 0$ for all $v in V$.



                      Clearly, if $f notin k[[x]]$, then $v(f)<0$ for the standard valuation $v$.



                      In the other direction, let $v in V$. Choose $n$ relatively prime to the characteristic of $k$. Let $f$ be of the form $1+sum_geq 1 a_j x^j$, then $f$ has an $n^j$-th root in $k((x))$ for all $j>0$. So $n^j | v(f)$ and we deduce that $v(f)=0$ for such an $f$. Any $g in k[[x]]$ is the sum of such an $f$ and an element of $k$, so any such $g$ has $v(g) geq 0$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$

















                        5












                        $begingroup$

                        Every automorphism of $k((x))$ preserves $k[[x]]$. This argument is adapted from an answer of Will Sawin. Let $V$ be the set of valuations $v : k((x))^times to mathbbZ$ which are $0$ on $k^times$. As usual, we put $v(0) = infty$ for any valuation $v$. I claim that $f in k[[x]]$ if and only if $v(f) geq 0$ for all $v in V$.



                        Clearly, if $f notin k[[x]]$, then $v(f)<0$ for the standard valuation $v$.



                        In the other direction, let $v in V$. Choose $n$ relatively prime to the characteristic of $k$. Let $f$ be of the form $1+sum_geq 1 a_j x^j$, then $f$ has an $n^j$-th root in $k((x))$ for all $j>0$. So $n^j | v(f)$ and we deduce that $v(f)=0$ for such an $f$. Any $g in k[[x]]$ is the sum of such an $f$ and an element of $k$, so any such $g$ has $v(g) geq 0$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$















                          5












                          5








                          5





                          $begingroup$

                          Every automorphism of $k((x))$ preserves $k[[x]]$. This argument is adapted from an answer of Will Sawin. Let $V$ be the set of valuations $v : k((x))^times to mathbbZ$ which are $0$ on $k^times$. As usual, we put $v(0) = infty$ for any valuation $v$. I claim that $f in k[[x]]$ if and only if $v(f) geq 0$ for all $v in V$.



                          Clearly, if $f notin k[[x]]$, then $v(f)<0$ for the standard valuation $v$.



                          In the other direction, let $v in V$. Choose $n$ relatively prime to the characteristic of $k$. Let $f$ be of the form $1+sum_geq 1 a_j x^j$, then $f$ has an $n^j$-th root in $k((x))$ for all $j>0$. So $n^j | v(f)$ and we deduce that $v(f)=0$ for such an $f$. Any $g in k[[x]]$ is the sum of such an $f$ and an element of $k$, so any such $g$ has $v(g) geq 0$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer











                          $endgroup$



                          Every automorphism of $k((x))$ preserves $k[[x]]$. This argument is adapted from an answer of Will Sawin. Let $V$ be the set of valuations $v : k((x))^times to mathbbZ$ which are $0$ on $k^times$. As usual, we put $v(0) = infty$ for any valuation $v$. I claim that $f in k[[x]]$ if and only if $v(f) geq 0$ for all $v in V$.



                          Clearly, if $f notin k[[x]]$, then $v(f)<0$ for the standard valuation $v$.



                          In the other direction, let $v in V$. Choose $n$ relatively prime to the characteristic of $k$. Let $f$ be of the form $1+sum_geq 1 a_j x^j$, then $f$ has an $n^j$-th root in $k((x))$ for all $j>0$. So $n^j | v(f)$ and we deduce that $v(f)=0$ for such an $f$. Any $g in k[[x]]$ is the sum of such an $f$ and an element of $k$, so any such $g$ has $v(g) geq 0$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited 6 hours ago

























                          answered 7 hours ago









                          David E SpeyerDavid E Speyer

                          110k10 gold badges289 silver badges554 bronze badges




                          110k10 gold badges289 silver badges554 bronze badges




















                              gentbent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              gentbent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              gentbent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              gentbent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                              Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f336012%2fa-dvr-algebra-with-weird-automorphisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                              Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                              19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу