A DVR algebra with weird automorphismsDoes there exist a discrete valuation subring $R$ of $K((t))$ ($K$ a number field) of residue characteristic $p$ with $mathrmFrac(R) = K((t))$?When does glueing affine schemes produce affine/separated schemes?When does the normalization have regular special fiber?Is the transcendence degree of a domain over a subfield the same as that of the fraction field of that domain?Are all henselian fields algebraic over complete fields?Are there ever exotic isomorphisms between quotients of F[x]?PAC field : Algebraically closed field :: ? : Henselian local ringHomologue of the Inertia group and of the Frobenius theorem for the group of values of a valuationIs the restriction of a graded automorphism of a polynomial ring to a polynomial subring linearizeable?Valuative criterion to extend morphism of schemesIf $f,g in D[x,y]$ are algebraically dependent over $D$, then $f,g in D[h]$ for some $hin D[x,y]$?Invertibility under base change for the Weyl algebra instead of for the polynomial algebra
A DVR algebra with weird automorphisms
Does there exist a discrete valuation subring $R$ of $K((t))$ ($K$ a number field) of residue characteristic $p$ with $mathrmFrac(R) = K((t))$?When does glueing affine schemes produce affine/separated schemes?When does the normalization have regular special fiber?Is the transcendence degree of a domain over a subfield the same as that of the fraction field of that domain?Are all henselian fields algebraic over complete fields?Are there ever exotic isomorphisms between quotients of F[x]?PAC field : Algebraically closed field :: ? : Henselian local ringHomologue of the Inertia group and of the Frobenius theorem for the group of values of a valuationIs the restriction of a graded automorphism of a polynomial ring to a polynomial subring linearizeable?Valuative criterion to extend morphism of schemesIf $f,g in D[x,y]$ are algebraically dependent over $D$, then $f,g in D[h]$ for some $hin D[x,y]$?Invertibility under base change for the Weyl algebra instead of for the polynomial algebra
$begingroup$
Denote by $k$ an algebraically closed field. Can one produce a DVR $A$ over $k$ such that
- the fraction field of $A$ has an automomorphism not preserving $A$
- no non-trivial field extension of $k$ maps, as a $k$-algebra, to $A$?
This question is in part inspired by this post (though I guess the connection is not entirely clear, I will try to clarify if this gets responses).
If $k((x))$ has an automorphism not preserving $k[[x]]$, that would mean a positive answer to this question. I do not know if such automorphism exists.
ac.commutative-algebra
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Denote by $k$ an algebraically closed field. Can one produce a DVR $A$ over $k$ such that
- the fraction field of $A$ has an automomorphism not preserving $A$
- no non-trivial field extension of $k$ maps, as a $k$-algebra, to $A$?
This question is in part inspired by this post (though I guess the connection is not entirely clear, I will try to clarify if this gets responses).
If $k((x))$ has an automorphism not preserving $k[[x]]$, that would mean a positive answer to this question. I do not know if such automorphism exists.
ac.commutative-algebra
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Denote by $k$ an algebraically closed field. Can one produce a DVR $A$ over $k$ such that
- the fraction field of $A$ has an automomorphism not preserving $A$
- no non-trivial field extension of $k$ maps, as a $k$-algebra, to $A$?
This question is in part inspired by this post (though I guess the connection is not entirely clear, I will try to clarify if this gets responses).
If $k((x))$ has an automorphism not preserving $k[[x]]$, that would mean a positive answer to this question. I do not know if such automorphism exists.
ac.commutative-algebra
New contributor
$endgroup$
Denote by $k$ an algebraically closed field. Can one produce a DVR $A$ over $k$ such that
- the fraction field of $A$ has an automomorphism not preserving $A$
- no non-trivial field extension of $k$ maps, as a $k$-algebra, to $A$?
This question is in part inspired by this post (though I guess the connection is not entirely clear, I will try to clarify if this gets responses).
If $k((x))$ has an automorphism not preserving $k[[x]]$, that would mean a positive answer to this question. I do not know if such automorphism exists.
ac.commutative-algebra
ac.commutative-algebra
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked 9 hours ago
gentbentgentbent
1905 bronze badges
1905 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you do not insist on completeness, an easier example seems to be $A=k[x]_(x)subseteq k(x)$. Then the substitution map $f(x)/g(x) mapsto f(x^-1)/g(x^-1)$ defines an automophism of $k(x)$ sending $A$ to its evil twin $k[x^-1]_(x^-1),$ hence not preserving $A$, and no proper overfield of $k$ can map into $A$ since the residue field of $A$ is $k$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every automorphism of $k((x))$ preserves $k[[x]]$. This argument is adapted from an answer of Will Sawin. Let $V$ be the set of valuations $v : k((x))^times to mathbbZ$ which are $0$ on $k^times$. As usual, we put $v(0) = infty$ for any valuation $v$. I claim that $f in k[[x]]$ if and only if $v(f) geq 0$ for all $v in V$.
Clearly, if $f notin k[[x]]$, then $v(f)<0$ for the standard valuation $v$.
In the other direction, let $v in V$. Choose $n$ relatively prime to the characteristic of $k$. Let $f$ be of the form $1+sum_geq 1 a_j x^j$, then $f$ has an $n^j$-th root in $k((x))$ for all $j>0$. So $n^j | v(f)$ and we deduce that $v(f)=0$ for such an $f$. Any $g in k[[x]]$ is the sum of such an $f$ and an element of $k$, so any such $g$ has $v(g) geq 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
gentbent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f336012%2fa-dvr-algebra-with-weird-automorphisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you do not insist on completeness, an easier example seems to be $A=k[x]_(x)subseteq k(x)$. Then the substitution map $f(x)/g(x) mapsto f(x^-1)/g(x^-1)$ defines an automophism of $k(x)$ sending $A$ to its evil twin $k[x^-1]_(x^-1),$ hence not preserving $A$, and no proper overfield of $k$ can map into $A$ since the residue field of $A$ is $k$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you do not insist on completeness, an easier example seems to be $A=k[x]_(x)subseteq k(x)$. Then the substitution map $f(x)/g(x) mapsto f(x^-1)/g(x^-1)$ defines an automophism of $k(x)$ sending $A$ to its evil twin $k[x^-1]_(x^-1),$ hence not preserving $A$, and no proper overfield of $k$ can map into $A$ since the residue field of $A$ is $k$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you do not insist on completeness, an easier example seems to be $A=k[x]_(x)subseteq k(x)$. Then the substitution map $f(x)/g(x) mapsto f(x^-1)/g(x^-1)$ defines an automophism of $k(x)$ sending $A$ to its evil twin $k[x^-1]_(x^-1),$ hence not preserving $A$, and no proper overfield of $k$ can map into $A$ since the residue field of $A$ is $k$.
$endgroup$
If you do not insist on completeness, an easier example seems to be $A=k[x]_(x)subseteq k(x)$. Then the substitution map $f(x)/g(x) mapsto f(x^-1)/g(x^-1)$ defines an automophism of $k(x)$ sending $A$ to its evil twin $k[x^-1]_(x^-1),$ hence not preserving $A$, and no proper overfield of $k$ can map into $A$ since the residue field of $A$ is $k$.
answered 7 hours ago
Pavel ČoupekPavel Čoupek
3203 silver badges8 bronze badges
3203 silver badges8 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every automorphism of $k((x))$ preserves $k[[x]]$. This argument is adapted from an answer of Will Sawin. Let $V$ be the set of valuations $v : k((x))^times to mathbbZ$ which are $0$ on $k^times$. As usual, we put $v(0) = infty$ for any valuation $v$. I claim that $f in k[[x]]$ if and only if $v(f) geq 0$ for all $v in V$.
Clearly, if $f notin k[[x]]$, then $v(f)<0$ for the standard valuation $v$.
In the other direction, let $v in V$. Choose $n$ relatively prime to the characteristic of $k$. Let $f$ be of the form $1+sum_geq 1 a_j x^j$, then $f$ has an $n^j$-th root in $k((x))$ for all $j>0$. So $n^j | v(f)$ and we deduce that $v(f)=0$ for such an $f$. Any $g in k[[x]]$ is the sum of such an $f$ and an element of $k$, so any such $g$ has $v(g) geq 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every automorphism of $k((x))$ preserves $k[[x]]$. This argument is adapted from an answer of Will Sawin. Let $V$ be the set of valuations $v : k((x))^times to mathbbZ$ which are $0$ on $k^times$. As usual, we put $v(0) = infty$ for any valuation $v$. I claim that $f in k[[x]]$ if and only if $v(f) geq 0$ for all $v in V$.
Clearly, if $f notin k[[x]]$, then $v(f)<0$ for the standard valuation $v$.
In the other direction, let $v in V$. Choose $n$ relatively prime to the characteristic of $k$. Let $f$ be of the form $1+sum_geq 1 a_j x^j$, then $f$ has an $n^j$-th root in $k((x))$ for all $j>0$. So $n^j | v(f)$ and we deduce that $v(f)=0$ for such an $f$. Any $g in k[[x]]$ is the sum of such an $f$ and an element of $k$, so any such $g$ has $v(g) geq 0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Every automorphism of $k((x))$ preserves $k[[x]]$. This argument is adapted from an answer of Will Sawin. Let $V$ be the set of valuations $v : k((x))^times to mathbbZ$ which are $0$ on $k^times$. As usual, we put $v(0) = infty$ for any valuation $v$. I claim that $f in k[[x]]$ if and only if $v(f) geq 0$ for all $v in V$.
Clearly, if $f notin k[[x]]$, then $v(f)<0$ for the standard valuation $v$.
In the other direction, let $v in V$. Choose $n$ relatively prime to the characteristic of $k$. Let $f$ be of the form $1+sum_geq 1 a_j x^j$, then $f$ has an $n^j$-th root in $k((x))$ for all $j>0$. So $n^j | v(f)$ and we deduce that $v(f)=0$ for such an $f$. Any $g in k[[x]]$ is the sum of such an $f$ and an element of $k$, so any such $g$ has $v(g) geq 0$.
$endgroup$
Every automorphism of $k((x))$ preserves $k[[x]]$. This argument is adapted from an answer of Will Sawin. Let $V$ be the set of valuations $v : k((x))^times to mathbbZ$ which are $0$ on $k^times$. As usual, we put $v(0) = infty$ for any valuation $v$. I claim that $f in k[[x]]$ if and only if $v(f) geq 0$ for all $v in V$.
Clearly, if $f notin k[[x]]$, then $v(f)<0$ for the standard valuation $v$.
In the other direction, let $v in V$. Choose $n$ relatively prime to the characteristic of $k$. Let $f$ be of the form $1+sum_geq 1 a_j x^j$, then $f$ has an $n^j$-th root in $k((x))$ for all $j>0$. So $n^j | v(f)$ and we deduce that $v(f)=0$ for such an $f$. Any $g in k[[x]]$ is the sum of such an $f$ and an element of $k$, so any such $g$ has $v(g) geq 0$.
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
David E SpeyerDavid E Speyer
110k10 gold badges289 silver badges554 bronze badges
110k10 gold badges289 silver badges554 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
gentbent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
gentbent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
gentbent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
gentbent is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f336012%2fa-dvr-algebra-with-weird-automorphisms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown