Steampunk helicopterWhat alternate course of technological advacement could realistically have occured?In what ways would Earth's landscape (with fauna and flora) be different if humanity had never affected it?How would humans adapt if robots take all the high-paying jobs, leaving only low-wage jobs?What would happen if I showed the Vikings advanced technology?How exactly would trading information take place if there were two virtually identical worlds that could message each other?A time travelers impact on historyCoil Gun Equivalents To Modern Firearm TypesDesigning an icy-surface vehicle for -70° without electronic circuits onboardSteam engine in the 14-15th centuryHow can an advanced civilization forget how to manufacture its technology?

Returning the argument of a function if the argument is not of the right type

How did the hit man miss?

Why would guns not work in the dungeon?

Email about missed connecting flight compensation 5 months after flight, is there a point?

Are neural networks prone to catastrophic forgetting?

Why did my rum cake turn black?

Extract an attribute value from XML

Can I use "candidate" as a verb?

I quit, and boss offered me 3 month "grace period" where I could still come back

The monorail explodes before I can get on it

Why does resistance reduce when a conductive fabric is stretched?

Why did the Japanese attack the Aleutians at the same time as Midway?

Repeating redundant information after dialogues, to avoid or not?

<schwitz>, <zwinker> etc. Does German always use 2nd Person Singular Imperative verbs for emoticons? If so, why?

What would the EU do if an EU member declared war on another EU member?

How might the United Kingdom become a republic?

Grammy Winners Grading

When did the Roman Empire fall according to contemporaries?

Stuck Apple Mail - how to reset?

Password maker in c#

Cubic programming and beyond?

Why isn't there research to build a standard lunar, or Martian mobility platform?

How do I determine whether a permit is required for a new gas line?

Supporting developers who insist on using their pet language



Steampunk helicopter


What alternate course of technological advacement could realistically have occured?In what ways would Earth's landscape (with fauna and flora) be different if humanity had never affected it?How would humans adapt if robots take all the high-paying jobs, leaving only low-wage jobs?What would happen if I showed the Vikings advanced technology?How exactly would trading information take place if there were two virtually identical worlds that could message each other?A time travelers impact on historyCoil Gun Equivalents To Modern Firearm TypesDesigning an icy-surface vehicle for -70° without electronic circuits onboardSteam engine in the 14-15th centuryHow can an advanced civilization forget how to manufacture its technology?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


In an alternate reality scenario that takes place during the renaissance, how can the world create a helicopter? Aside from the obvious need for machines, factories, and aviation knowledge, what other obstacles would inventors face and how would they overcome them (swashplate, engine, etc.)?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean "Renaissance" (pre-industrial era) or "Steampunk" (industrial era)?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This borders on High Concept in it's broadness of scope. Also the period confusion makes it notably difficult to even start looking at properly.
    $endgroup$
    – Ash
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You cannot have machines and factories in the Renaissance. Technology is a mountain, you cannot have the summit without the rest of the mountain. If you have machines, factories, aviation knowledge, advanced materials etc. then you also you have masses of well-paid literate workers; you have an advanced economy; you have good knowledge of mathematics and physics: that world is not the world of the Renaissance. One thing historical materialism got right: it is the economic base (including trade, technology, and science) which determines the ideological, artistic, judicial etc. superstructure.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    P.S. What has steampunk to do with the Renaissance? Steampunk is usually Victorian / Belle Époque / Gilded Age. There were no steam engines in the Renaissance.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago

















2












$begingroup$


In an alternate reality scenario that takes place during the renaissance, how can the world create a helicopter? Aside from the obvious need for machines, factories, and aviation knowledge, what other obstacles would inventors face and how would they overcome them (swashplate, engine, etc.)?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean "Renaissance" (pre-industrial era) or "Steampunk" (industrial era)?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This borders on High Concept in it's broadness of scope. Also the period confusion makes it notably difficult to even start looking at properly.
    $endgroup$
    – Ash
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You cannot have machines and factories in the Renaissance. Technology is a mountain, you cannot have the summit without the rest of the mountain. If you have machines, factories, aviation knowledge, advanced materials etc. then you also you have masses of well-paid literate workers; you have an advanced economy; you have good knowledge of mathematics and physics: that world is not the world of the Renaissance. One thing historical materialism got right: it is the economic base (including trade, technology, and science) which determines the ideological, artistic, judicial etc. superstructure.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    P.S. What has steampunk to do with the Renaissance? Steampunk is usually Victorian / Belle Époque / Gilded Age. There were no steam engines in the Renaissance.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$


In an alternate reality scenario that takes place during the renaissance, how can the world create a helicopter? Aside from the obvious need for machines, factories, and aviation knowledge, what other obstacles would inventors face and how would they overcome them (swashplate, engine, etc.)?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




In an alternate reality scenario that takes place during the renaissance, how can the world create a helicopter? Aside from the obvious need for machines, factories, and aviation knowledge, what other obstacles would inventors face and how would they overcome them (swashplate, engine, etc.)?







technology alternate-history






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









EDL

3,3404 silver badges21 bronze badges




3,3404 silver badges21 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









Eric cliffordEric clifford

4081 silver badge11 bronze badges




4081 silver badge11 bronze badges







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean "Renaissance" (pre-industrial era) or "Steampunk" (industrial era)?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This borders on High Concept in it's broadness of scope. Also the period confusion makes it notably difficult to even start looking at properly.
    $endgroup$
    – Ash
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You cannot have machines and factories in the Renaissance. Technology is a mountain, you cannot have the summit without the rest of the mountain. If you have machines, factories, aviation knowledge, advanced materials etc. then you also you have masses of well-paid literate workers; you have an advanced economy; you have good knowledge of mathematics and physics: that world is not the world of the Renaissance. One thing historical materialism got right: it is the economic base (including trade, technology, and science) which determines the ideological, artistic, judicial etc. superstructure.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    P.S. What has steampunk to do with the Renaissance? Steampunk is usually Victorian / Belle Époque / Gilded Age. There were no steam engines in the Renaissance.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you mean "Renaissance" (pre-industrial era) or "Steampunk" (industrial era)?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    This borders on High Concept in it's broadness of scope. Also the period confusion makes it notably difficult to even start looking at properly.
    $endgroup$
    – Ash
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    You cannot have machines and factories in the Renaissance. Technology is a mountain, you cannot have the summit without the rest of the mountain. If you have machines, factories, aviation knowledge, advanced materials etc. then you also you have masses of well-paid literate workers; you have an advanced economy; you have good knowledge of mathematics and physics: that world is not the world of the Renaissance. One thing historical materialism got right: it is the economic base (including trade, technology, and science) which determines the ideological, artistic, judicial etc. superstructure.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    P.S. What has steampunk to do with the Renaissance? Steampunk is usually Victorian / Belle Époque / Gilded Age. There were no steam engines in the Renaissance.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
Do you mean "Renaissance" (pre-industrial era) or "Steampunk" (industrial era)?
$endgroup$
– Alexander
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Do you mean "Renaissance" (pre-industrial era) or "Steampunk" (industrial era)?
$endgroup$
– Alexander
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
This borders on High Concept in it's broadness of scope. Also the period confusion makes it notably difficult to even start looking at properly.
$endgroup$
– Ash
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
This borders on High Concept in it's broadness of scope. Also the period confusion makes it notably difficult to even start looking at properly.
$endgroup$
– Ash
8 hours ago













$begingroup$
You cannot have machines and factories in the Renaissance. Technology is a mountain, you cannot have the summit without the rest of the mountain. If you have machines, factories, aviation knowledge, advanced materials etc. then you also you have masses of well-paid literate workers; you have an advanced economy; you have good knowledge of mathematics and physics: that world is not the world of the Renaissance. One thing historical materialism got right: it is the economic base (including trade, technology, and science) which determines the ideological, artistic, judicial etc. superstructure.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
You cannot have machines and factories in the Renaissance. Technology is a mountain, you cannot have the summit without the rest of the mountain. If you have machines, factories, aviation knowledge, advanced materials etc. then you also you have masses of well-paid literate workers; you have an advanced economy; you have good knowledge of mathematics and physics: that world is not the world of the Renaissance. One thing historical materialism got right: it is the economic base (including trade, technology, and science) which determines the ideological, artistic, judicial etc. superstructure.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago





2




2




$begingroup$
P.S. What has steampunk to do with the Renaissance? Steampunk is usually Victorian / Belle Époque / Gilded Age. There were no steam engines in the Renaissance.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
P.S. What has steampunk to do with the Renaissance? Steampunk is usually Victorian / Belle Époque / Gilded Age. There were no steam engines in the Renaissance.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















6












$begingroup$

Forget it.



To make a helicopter fly, you need a relatively high power-to-weight ratio. Early helicopters used piston engines, but most modern designs use gas turbines. Still, they have problems getting their payload airborne, especially in hot and high conditions.



With anything remotely like the renaissance, your power plants will have insufficient power-to-weight. Engines, gearboxes, airframe, everything will be much heavier for the same performance. If present-day helicopters are only marginally able to fly, yours will shake itself apart on the ground. So there are three options:



  • Improve the technology so that it is "renaissance" in name only. Steel and alloys, precision engineering, industrial-scale chemical engineering, and all that.

  • Go for a mode of flight that is "easier." Turn an early hot air (or hydrogen?) balloon into a powered airship, cruising along at single-digit mph, maybe.

  • Tell a story that is so fascinating that readers are willing to ignore how impossible it is.





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    As noted, steam engines are fare too heavy (or have a low power to weight ratio), particularly if you are trying to "invent" one in the 1500's. Alternatives like Stirling engines would be somewhat better (since they don't have the mass of the water and boiler to go with them), but not by enough. Relatively high power to weight ratio Stirling engines had to wait until the 20th century, when auto makers considered them as a possible alternative to IC engines for cars. This combined a true need with the benefits of having a large and very sophisticated technological foundation to draw upon.



    However, there is one extremely wild handwave which might be barely possible: Leonardo da Vinci creates a turbine powered helicopter.



    Leonardo was massively ahead of his time, but most of his inventions were impractical for the period because there was no compact power source available. His clockwork powered "car" does work as advertised, but modern replicas only go about 40 metres before the springs unwind. The team of men cranking away on his "tank" can move modern replicas over flat, firmly packed ground, but there is no possible way it could actually move cross country. The flying machines could possibly work as gliders with the wings outstretched, but no human could ever pump the mechanism fast or hard enough for the flapping motion to make it fly.



    enter image description here



    Leonardo's car



    enter image description here



    Leonardo's tank



    enter image description here



    The Great Bird



    However, Leonardo also invented an early heat engine, utilizing the energy from a stove to turn a spit:



    enter image description here



    Leonardo's roasting jack



    If Leonardo were to consider how to harness the energy from the jack to turn the airscrew of the helicopter, there is a (very low) probability that he might generate enough lift to at least hover briefly. Even assuming complete success, Leonardo's helicopter has no real means of control, and likely would be unflyable.



    enter image description here



    Leonardo's helicopter



    The most probable means of success would be to have some sort of clutching mechanism, and spin the airscrew up to speed by an external mechanism, such as a team of horses pulling a rope wrapped around the axle of the airscrew. Once aloft, the pilot engages the clutch and the "jack" keeps the airscrew spinning quickly enough for a relatively controlled descent. The device might "jump" into the air to the height of a low tower (3 or possibly 4 stories) then spin down to earth at a relatively slow speed (enough to walk away from).



    Sadly, this story would likely repeat from the Renaissance to the late industrial age (like it did in our time line; the first successful helicopter flights took place just before WWII. Even autogyros did not fly until the 1920's, and they are far easier to create since the rotor freewheels and has no thrust delivered to it).



    So Leonardo could put in heroic efforts, but end up with an entertaining toy for the Duke d'Sforza. With the technological base of the 1500's, that is about all that would be possible.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      2












      $begingroup$

      Propeller speed



      Leonardo da Vince, rather famously, sketched out the design for a mock helicopter.



      Helicopter



      I'm not saying this specific design would work, I'm saying that the Renaissance definitely had people with the knowledge and the drive to make such helicopter if they felt like it. The math required isn't complex The main problem is that you specified steampunk, which, while a fantastic genre, uses steam powered engines. And those are heavy. Really heavy. To the point where they wouldn't work.



      Helicopter lift follows the equation: L = .5p(v^2)ACL, where



      • L = Lift (Newtons)

      • p = air density (kg)

      • v^2 = speed of the spinning blade (meters per second)

      • A = disk area of the rotor (meters)

      • CL = Lift coefficient (this is a coefficient that must be calculated based on the angle of the rotor and other factors - I don't know much about it, but it's between .2 and even up to 1.75)

      Of course, the large the disk area, the slower it goes because it's heavier and the motor can't catch up. A steam engine is very heavy - and takes a lot of fuel. According to this website, that all adds up to 12 gross pounds per horsepower, and yes, that's not for all helicopters, but it's a good starting point. 5443g to 745.7 watts or 7.3 grams per watts, and that gives us a maximum weight to power ratio of 137 W/kg. Which no steam engine has. So you just need to cheat. That's fine. The rule of steampunk is that you get one free pass, so all you need is an engine that works absurdly better than any steam engine has a right to do so.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        0












        $begingroup$

        There may be one way to make a "helicopter" with steampunk technology: hybrid lift.



        As noted in other answers, a steam engine can't come close to lifting itself, even if you use highly refined liquid fuel and a closed vapor system to minimize the weight of water -- but if you have a large, slow rotor made like a dirigible envelope (rigid structure enclosing bags of lifting gas), it doesn't have to move very fast to produce a tremendous amount of dynamic lift.



        In the end, this would probably be less efficient than a steam powered Zeppelin, and even more vulnerable to weather, but you could handwave it to at least fly.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150795%2fsteampunk-helicopter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          6












          $begingroup$

          Forget it.



          To make a helicopter fly, you need a relatively high power-to-weight ratio. Early helicopters used piston engines, but most modern designs use gas turbines. Still, they have problems getting their payload airborne, especially in hot and high conditions.



          With anything remotely like the renaissance, your power plants will have insufficient power-to-weight. Engines, gearboxes, airframe, everything will be much heavier for the same performance. If present-day helicopters are only marginally able to fly, yours will shake itself apart on the ground. So there are three options:



          • Improve the technology so that it is "renaissance" in name only. Steel and alloys, precision engineering, industrial-scale chemical engineering, and all that.

          • Go for a mode of flight that is "easier." Turn an early hot air (or hydrogen?) balloon into a powered airship, cruising along at single-digit mph, maybe.

          • Tell a story that is so fascinating that readers are willing to ignore how impossible it is.





          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$

















            6












            $begingroup$

            Forget it.



            To make a helicopter fly, you need a relatively high power-to-weight ratio. Early helicopters used piston engines, but most modern designs use gas turbines. Still, they have problems getting their payload airborne, especially in hot and high conditions.



            With anything remotely like the renaissance, your power plants will have insufficient power-to-weight. Engines, gearboxes, airframe, everything will be much heavier for the same performance. If present-day helicopters are only marginally able to fly, yours will shake itself apart on the ground. So there are three options:



            • Improve the technology so that it is "renaissance" in name only. Steel and alloys, precision engineering, industrial-scale chemical engineering, and all that.

            • Go for a mode of flight that is "easier." Turn an early hot air (or hydrogen?) balloon into a powered airship, cruising along at single-digit mph, maybe.

            • Tell a story that is so fascinating that readers are willing to ignore how impossible it is.





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$















              6












              6








              6





              $begingroup$

              Forget it.



              To make a helicopter fly, you need a relatively high power-to-weight ratio. Early helicopters used piston engines, but most modern designs use gas turbines. Still, they have problems getting their payload airborne, especially in hot and high conditions.



              With anything remotely like the renaissance, your power plants will have insufficient power-to-weight. Engines, gearboxes, airframe, everything will be much heavier for the same performance. If present-day helicopters are only marginally able to fly, yours will shake itself apart on the ground. So there are three options:



              • Improve the technology so that it is "renaissance" in name only. Steel and alloys, precision engineering, industrial-scale chemical engineering, and all that.

              • Go for a mode of flight that is "easier." Turn an early hot air (or hydrogen?) balloon into a powered airship, cruising along at single-digit mph, maybe.

              • Tell a story that is so fascinating that readers are willing to ignore how impossible it is.





              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Forget it.



              To make a helicopter fly, you need a relatively high power-to-weight ratio. Early helicopters used piston engines, but most modern designs use gas turbines. Still, they have problems getting their payload airborne, especially in hot and high conditions.



              With anything remotely like the renaissance, your power plants will have insufficient power-to-weight. Engines, gearboxes, airframe, everything will be much heavier for the same performance. If present-day helicopters are only marginally able to fly, yours will shake itself apart on the ground. So there are three options:



              • Improve the technology so that it is "renaissance" in name only. Steel and alloys, precision engineering, industrial-scale chemical engineering, and all that.

              • Go for a mode of flight that is "easier." Turn an early hot air (or hydrogen?) balloon into a powered airship, cruising along at single-digit mph, maybe.

              • Tell a story that is so fascinating that readers are willing to ignore how impossible it is.






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 8 hours ago









              o.m.o.m.

              66.6k7 gold badges99 silver badges220 bronze badges




              66.6k7 gold badges99 silver badges220 bronze badges























                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  As noted, steam engines are fare too heavy (or have a low power to weight ratio), particularly if you are trying to "invent" one in the 1500's. Alternatives like Stirling engines would be somewhat better (since they don't have the mass of the water and boiler to go with them), but not by enough. Relatively high power to weight ratio Stirling engines had to wait until the 20th century, when auto makers considered them as a possible alternative to IC engines for cars. This combined a true need with the benefits of having a large and very sophisticated technological foundation to draw upon.



                  However, there is one extremely wild handwave which might be barely possible: Leonardo da Vinci creates a turbine powered helicopter.



                  Leonardo was massively ahead of his time, but most of his inventions were impractical for the period because there was no compact power source available. His clockwork powered "car" does work as advertised, but modern replicas only go about 40 metres before the springs unwind. The team of men cranking away on his "tank" can move modern replicas over flat, firmly packed ground, but there is no possible way it could actually move cross country. The flying machines could possibly work as gliders with the wings outstretched, but no human could ever pump the mechanism fast or hard enough for the flapping motion to make it fly.



                  enter image description here



                  Leonardo's car



                  enter image description here



                  Leonardo's tank



                  enter image description here



                  The Great Bird



                  However, Leonardo also invented an early heat engine, utilizing the energy from a stove to turn a spit:



                  enter image description here



                  Leonardo's roasting jack



                  If Leonardo were to consider how to harness the energy from the jack to turn the airscrew of the helicopter, there is a (very low) probability that he might generate enough lift to at least hover briefly. Even assuming complete success, Leonardo's helicopter has no real means of control, and likely would be unflyable.



                  enter image description here



                  Leonardo's helicopter



                  The most probable means of success would be to have some sort of clutching mechanism, and spin the airscrew up to speed by an external mechanism, such as a team of horses pulling a rope wrapped around the axle of the airscrew. Once aloft, the pilot engages the clutch and the "jack" keeps the airscrew spinning quickly enough for a relatively controlled descent. The device might "jump" into the air to the height of a low tower (3 or possibly 4 stories) then spin down to earth at a relatively slow speed (enough to walk away from).



                  Sadly, this story would likely repeat from the Renaissance to the late industrial age (like it did in our time line; the first successful helicopter flights took place just before WWII. Even autogyros did not fly until the 1920's, and they are far easier to create since the rotor freewheels and has no thrust delivered to it).



                  So Leonardo could put in heroic efforts, but end up with an entertaining toy for the Duke d'Sforza. With the technological base of the 1500's, that is about all that would be possible.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$

















                    3












                    $begingroup$

                    As noted, steam engines are fare too heavy (or have a low power to weight ratio), particularly if you are trying to "invent" one in the 1500's. Alternatives like Stirling engines would be somewhat better (since they don't have the mass of the water and boiler to go with them), but not by enough. Relatively high power to weight ratio Stirling engines had to wait until the 20th century, when auto makers considered them as a possible alternative to IC engines for cars. This combined a true need with the benefits of having a large and very sophisticated technological foundation to draw upon.



                    However, there is one extremely wild handwave which might be barely possible: Leonardo da Vinci creates a turbine powered helicopter.



                    Leonardo was massively ahead of his time, but most of his inventions were impractical for the period because there was no compact power source available. His clockwork powered "car" does work as advertised, but modern replicas only go about 40 metres before the springs unwind. The team of men cranking away on his "tank" can move modern replicas over flat, firmly packed ground, but there is no possible way it could actually move cross country. The flying machines could possibly work as gliders with the wings outstretched, but no human could ever pump the mechanism fast or hard enough for the flapping motion to make it fly.



                    enter image description here



                    Leonardo's car



                    enter image description here



                    Leonardo's tank



                    enter image description here



                    The Great Bird



                    However, Leonardo also invented an early heat engine, utilizing the energy from a stove to turn a spit:



                    enter image description here



                    Leonardo's roasting jack



                    If Leonardo were to consider how to harness the energy from the jack to turn the airscrew of the helicopter, there is a (very low) probability that he might generate enough lift to at least hover briefly. Even assuming complete success, Leonardo's helicopter has no real means of control, and likely would be unflyable.



                    enter image description here



                    Leonardo's helicopter



                    The most probable means of success would be to have some sort of clutching mechanism, and spin the airscrew up to speed by an external mechanism, such as a team of horses pulling a rope wrapped around the axle of the airscrew. Once aloft, the pilot engages the clutch and the "jack" keeps the airscrew spinning quickly enough for a relatively controlled descent. The device might "jump" into the air to the height of a low tower (3 or possibly 4 stories) then spin down to earth at a relatively slow speed (enough to walk away from).



                    Sadly, this story would likely repeat from the Renaissance to the late industrial age (like it did in our time line; the first successful helicopter flights took place just before WWII. Even autogyros did not fly until the 1920's, and they are far easier to create since the rotor freewheels and has no thrust delivered to it).



                    So Leonardo could put in heroic efforts, but end up with an entertaining toy for the Duke d'Sforza. With the technological base of the 1500's, that is about all that would be possible.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$















                      3












                      3








                      3





                      $begingroup$

                      As noted, steam engines are fare too heavy (or have a low power to weight ratio), particularly if you are trying to "invent" one in the 1500's. Alternatives like Stirling engines would be somewhat better (since they don't have the mass of the water and boiler to go with them), but not by enough. Relatively high power to weight ratio Stirling engines had to wait until the 20th century, when auto makers considered them as a possible alternative to IC engines for cars. This combined a true need with the benefits of having a large and very sophisticated technological foundation to draw upon.



                      However, there is one extremely wild handwave which might be barely possible: Leonardo da Vinci creates a turbine powered helicopter.



                      Leonardo was massively ahead of his time, but most of his inventions were impractical for the period because there was no compact power source available. His clockwork powered "car" does work as advertised, but modern replicas only go about 40 metres before the springs unwind. The team of men cranking away on his "tank" can move modern replicas over flat, firmly packed ground, but there is no possible way it could actually move cross country. The flying machines could possibly work as gliders with the wings outstretched, but no human could ever pump the mechanism fast or hard enough for the flapping motion to make it fly.



                      enter image description here



                      Leonardo's car



                      enter image description here



                      Leonardo's tank



                      enter image description here



                      The Great Bird



                      However, Leonardo also invented an early heat engine, utilizing the energy from a stove to turn a spit:



                      enter image description here



                      Leonardo's roasting jack



                      If Leonardo were to consider how to harness the energy from the jack to turn the airscrew of the helicopter, there is a (very low) probability that he might generate enough lift to at least hover briefly. Even assuming complete success, Leonardo's helicopter has no real means of control, and likely would be unflyable.



                      enter image description here



                      Leonardo's helicopter



                      The most probable means of success would be to have some sort of clutching mechanism, and spin the airscrew up to speed by an external mechanism, such as a team of horses pulling a rope wrapped around the axle of the airscrew. Once aloft, the pilot engages the clutch and the "jack" keeps the airscrew spinning quickly enough for a relatively controlled descent. The device might "jump" into the air to the height of a low tower (3 or possibly 4 stories) then spin down to earth at a relatively slow speed (enough to walk away from).



                      Sadly, this story would likely repeat from the Renaissance to the late industrial age (like it did in our time line; the first successful helicopter flights took place just before WWII. Even autogyros did not fly until the 1920's, and they are far easier to create since the rotor freewheels and has no thrust delivered to it).



                      So Leonardo could put in heroic efforts, but end up with an entertaining toy for the Duke d'Sforza. With the technological base of the 1500's, that is about all that would be possible.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      As noted, steam engines are fare too heavy (or have a low power to weight ratio), particularly if you are trying to "invent" one in the 1500's. Alternatives like Stirling engines would be somewhat better (since they don't have the mass of the water and boiler to go with them), but not by enough. Relatively high power to weight ratio Stirling engines had to wait until the 20th century, when auto makers considered them as a possible alternative to IC engines for cars. This combined a true need with the benefits of having a large and very sophisticated technological foundation to draw upon.



                      However, there is one extremely wild handwave which might be barely possible: Leonardo da Vinci creates a turbine powered helicopter.



                      Leonardo was massively ahead of his time, but most of his inventions were impractical for the period because there was no compact power source available. His clockwork powered "car" does work as advertised, but modern replicas only go about 40 metres before the springs unwind. The team of men cranking away on his "tank" can move modern replicas over flat, firmly packed ground, but there is no possible way it could actually move cross country. The flying machines could possibly work as gliders with the wings outstretched, but no human could ever pump the mechanism fast or hard enough for the flapping motion to make it fly.



                      enter image description here



                      Leonardo's car



                      enter image description here



                      Leonardo's tank



                      enter image description here



                      The Great Bird



                      However, Leonardo also invented an early heat engine, utilizing the energy from a stove to turn a spit:



                      enter image description here



                      Leonardo's roasting jack



                      If Leonardo were to consider how to harness the energy from the jack to turn the airscrew of the helicopter, there is a (very low) probability that he might generate enough lift to at least hover briefly. Even assuming complete success, Leonardo's helicopter has no real means of control, and likely would be unflyable.



                      enter image description here



                      Leonardo's helicopter



                      The most probable means of success would be to have some sort of clutching mechanism, and spin the airscrew up to speed by an external mechanism, such as a team of horses pulling a rope wrapped around the axle of the airscrew. Once aloft, the pilot engages the clutch and the "jack" keeps the airscrew spinning quickly enough for a relatively controlled descent. The device might "jump" into the air to the height of a low tower (3 or possibly 4 stories) then spin down to earth at a relatively slow speed (enough to walk away from).



                      Sadly, this story would likely repeat from the Renaissance to the late industrial age (like it did in our time line; the first successful helicopter flights took place just before WWII. Even autogyros did not fly until the 1920's, and they are far easier to create since the rotor freewheels and has no thrust delivered to it).



                      So Leonardo could put in heroic efforts, but end up with an entertaining toy for the Duke d'Sforza. With the technological base of the 1500's, that is about all that would be possible.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 3 hours ago









                      ThucydidesThucydides

                      83.8k6 gold badges80 silver badges255 bronze badges




                      83.8k6 gold badges80 silver badges255 bronze badges





















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          Propeller speed



                          Leonardo da Vince, rather famously, sketched out the design for a mock helicopter.



                          Helicopter



                          I'm not saying this specific design would work, I'm saying that the Renaissance definitely had people with the knowledge and the drive to make such helicopter if they felt like it. The math required isn't complex The main problem is that you specified steampunk, which, while a fantastic genre, uses steam powered engines. And those are heavy. Really heavy. To the point where they wouldn't work.



                          Helicopter lift follows the equation: L = .5p(v^2)ACL, where



                          • L = Lift (Newtons)

                          • p = air density (kg)

                          • v^2 = speed of the spinning blade (meters per second)

                          • A = disk area of the rotor (meters)

                          • CL = Lift coefficient (this is a coefficient that must be calculated based on the angle of the rotor and other factors - I don't know much about it, but it's between .2 and even up to 1.75)

                          Of course, the large the disk area, the slower it goes because it's heavier and the motor can't catch up. A steam engine is very heavy - and takes a lot of fuel. According to this website, that all adds up to 12 gross pounds per horsepower, and yes, that's not for all helicopters, but it's a good starting point. 5443g to 745.7 watts or 7.3 grams per watts, and that gives us a maximum weight to power ratio of 137 W/kg. Which no steam engine has. So you just need to cheat. That's fine. The rule of steampunk is that you get one free pass, so all you need is an engine that works absurdly better than any steam engine has a right to do so.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            2












                            $begingroup$

                            Propeller speed



                            Leonardo da Vince, rather famously, sketched out the design for a mock helicopter.



                            Helicopter



                            I'm not saying this specific design would work, I'm saying that the Renaissance definitely had people with the knowledge and the drive to make such helicopter if they felt like it. The math required isn't complex The main problem is that you specified steampunk, which, while a fantastic genre, uses steam powered engines. And those are heavy. Really heavy. To the point where they wouldn't work.



                            Helicopter lift follows the equation: L = .5p(v^2)ACL, where



                            • L = Lift (Newtons)

                            • p = air density (kg)

                            • v^2 = speed of the spinning blade (meters per second)

                            • A = disk area of the rotor (meters)

                            • CL = Lift coefficient (this is a coefficient that must be calculated based on the angle of the rotor and other factors - I don't know much about it, but it's between .2 and even up to 1.75)

                            Of course, the large the disk area, the slower it goes because it's heavier and the motor can't catch up. A steam engine is very heavy - and takes a lot of fuel. According to this website, that all adds up to 12 gross pounds per horsepower, and yes, that's not for all helicopters, but it's a good starting point. 5443g to 745.7 watts or 7.3 grams per watts, and that gives us a maximum weight to power ratio of 137 W/kg. Which no steam engine has. So you just need to cheat. That's fine. The rule of steampunk is that you get one free pass, so all you need is an engine that works absurdly better than any steam engine has a right to do so.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              2












                              2








                              2





                              $begingroup$

                              Propeller speed



                              Leonardo da Vince, rather famously, sketched out the design for a mock helicopter.



                              Helicopter



                              I'm not saying this specific design would work, I'm saying that the Renaissance definitely had people with the knowledge and the drive to make such helicopter if they felt like it. The math required isn't complex The main problem is that you specified steampunk, which, while a fantastic genre, uses steam powered engines. And those are heavy. Really heavy. To the point where they wouldn't work.



                              Helicopter lift follows the equation: L = .5p(v^2)ACL, where



                              • L = Lift (Newtons)

                              • p = air density (kg)

                              • v^2 = speed of the spinning blade (meters per second)

                              • A = disk area of the rotor (meters)

                              • CL = Lift coefficient (this is a coefficient that must be calculated based on the angle of the rotor and other factors - I don't know much about it, but it's between .2 and even up to 1.75)

                              Of course, the large the disk area, the slower it goes because it's heavier and the motor can't catch up. A steam engine is very heavy - and takes a lot of fuel. According to this website, that all adds up to 12 gross pounds per horsepower, and yes, that's not for all helicopters, but it's a good starting point. 5443g to 745.7 watts or 7.3 grams per watts, and that gives us a maximum weight to power ratio of 137 W/kg. Which no steam engine has. So you just need to cheat. That's fine. The rule of steampunk is that you get one free pass, so all you need is an engine that works absurdly better than any steam engine has a right to do so.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              Propeller speed



                              Leonardo da Vince, rather famously, sketched out the design for a mock helicopter.



                              Helicopter



                              I'm not saying this specific design would work, I'm saying that the Renaissance definitely had people with the knowledge and the drive to make such helicopter if they felt like it. The math required isn't complex The main problem is that you specified steampunk, which, while a fantastic genre, uses steam powered engines. And those are heavy. Really heavy. To the point where they wouldn't work.



                              Helicopter lift follows the equation: L = .5p(v^2)ACL, where



                              • L = Lift (Newtons)

                              • p = air density (kg)

                              • v^2 = speed of the spinning blade (meters per second)

                              • A = disk area of the rotor (meters)

                              • CL = Lift coefficient (this is a coefficient that must be calculated based on the angle of the rotor and other factors - I don't know much about it, but it's between .2 and even up to 1.75)

                              Of course, the large the disk area, the slower it goes because it's heavier and the motor can't catch up. A steam engine is very heavy - and takes a lot of fuel. According to this website, that all adds up to 12 gross pounds per horsepower, and yes, that's not for all helicopters, but it's a good starting point. 5443g to 745.7 watts or 7.3 grams per watts, and that gives us a maximum weight to power ratio of 137 W/kg. Which no steam engine has. So you just need to cheat. That's fine. The rule of steampunk is that you get one free pass, so all you need is an engine that works absurdly better than any steam engine has a right to do so.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 8 hours ago









                              HalfthawedHalfthawed

                              3,3134 silver badges18 bronze badges




                              3,3134 silver badges18 bronze badges





















                                  0












                                  $begingroup$

                                  There may be one way to make a "helicopter" with steampunk technology: hybrid lift.



                                  As noted in other answers, a steam engine can't come close to lifting itself, even if you use highly refined liquid fuel and a closed vapor system to minimize the weight of water -- but if you have a large, slow rotor made like a dirigible envelope (rigid structure enclosing bags of lifting gas), it doesn't have to move very fast to produce a tremendous amount of dynamic lift.



                                  In the end, this would probably be less efficient than a steam powered Zeppelin, and even more vulnerable to weather, but you could handwave it to at least fly.






                                  share|improve this answer









                                  $endgroup$

















                                    0












                                    $begingroup$

                                    There may be one way to make a "helicopter" with steampunk technology: hybrid lift.



                                    As noted in other answers, a steam engine can't come close to lifting itself, even if you use highly refined liquid fuel and a closed vapor system to minimize the weight of water -- but if you have a large, slow rotor made like a dirigible envelope (rigid structure enclosing bags of lifting gas), it doesn't have to move very fast to produce a tremendous amount of dynamic lift.



                                    In the end, this would probably be less efficient than a steam powered Zeppelin, and even more vulnerable to weather, but you could handwave it to at least fly.






                                    share|improve this answer









                                    $endgroup$















                                      0












                                      0








                                      0





                                      $begingroup$

                                      There may be one way to make a "helicopter" with steampunk technology: hybrid lift.



                                      As noted in other answers, a steam engine can't come close to lifting itself, even if you use highly refined liquid fuel and a closed vapor system to minimize the weight of water -- but if you have a large, slow rotor made like a dirigible envelope (rigid structure enclosing bags of lifting gas), it doesn't have to move very fast to produce a tremendous amount of dynamic lift.



                                      In the end, this would probably be less efficient than a steam powered Zeppelin, and even more vulnerable to weather, but you could handwave it to at least fly.






                                      share|improve this answer









                                      $endgroup$



                                      There may be one way to make a "helicopter" with steampunk technology: hybrid lift.



                                      As noted in other answers, a steam engine can't come close to lifting itself, even if you use highly refined liquid fuel and a closed vapor system to minimize the weight of water -- but if you have a large, slow rotor made like a dirigible envelope (rigid structure enclosing bags of lifting gas), it doesn't have to move very fast to produce a tremendous amount of dynamic lift.



                                      In the end, this would probably be less efficient than a steam powered Zeppelin, and even more vulnerable to weather, but you could handwave it to at least fly.







                                      share|improve this answer












                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer










                                      answered 7 hours ago









                                      Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon

                                      7,13612 silver badges34 bronze badges




                                      7,13612 silver badges34 bronze badges



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150795%2fsteampunk-helicopter%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                                          Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                                          19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу