Is this fuse time-current curve wrong?How does a fuse blow at its current rating, regardless of voltage?Fuse rating and safetyIs there a standard stating how fast a fast fuse is, how slow a slow fuse is?Zener Diode + fuse overvoltage protection for LEDs with constant current driver- fast or slow blow fuse?Replacing the fast tube fuse with polymer fusefast or slow fuse in transformerSmall step down transformer fuse, primary or secondary?Is this fuse on a mains switch adequate?Will a 300A HV connector fail before a 600A fuse does?Question on fuses specifications
The symbol "~" is not showing up
What is this green alien supposed to be on the American covers of the "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"?
''Habitable'' planet close to a star
Pi 3 B+ no audio device found
Should I be able to keep my company purchased standing desk when I leave my job?
How fast does a character need to move to be effectively invisible?
Why does "git status" show I'm on the master branch and "git branch" does not in a newly created repository?
Is the Münchhausen trilemma really a trilemma?
Improve quality of image bars
How to find location on Cambridge-Mildenhall railway that still has tracks/rails?
Wordplay addition paradox
Does the Intel 8085 CPU use real memory addresses?
Was Apollo 13 radio blackout on reentry longer than expected?
When designing an adventure, how can I ensure a continuous player experience in a setting that's likely to favor TPKs?
Why doesn't philosophy have higher standards for its arguments?
What is the difference between a Hosaka, Ono-Sendai, and a "deck"?
Is this artwork (used in a video game) real?
Why don't commercial aircraft adopt a slightly more seaplane-like design to allow safer ditching in case of emergency?
How can I obtain a complete list of the kinds of atomic expressions in the Wolfram Language using only the language itself?
How possible is a successful landing just with 1 wing?
What are "full piece" and "half piece" in chess?
Optimising the Selection of MaxValue in Association
A scene of Jimmy diversity
FPGA CPUs, how to find the max speed?
Is this fuse time-current curve wrong?
How does a fuse blow at its current rating, regardless of voltage?Fuse rating and safetyIs there a standard stating how fast a fast fuse is, how slow a slow fuse is?Zener Diode + fuse overvoltage protection for LEDs with constant current driver- fast or slow blow fuse?Replacing the fast tube fuse with polymer fusefast or slow fuse in transformerSmall step down transformer fuse, primary or secondary?Is this fuse on a mains switch adequate?Will a 300A HV connector fail before a 600A fuse does?Question on fuses specifications
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I'm looking at the datasheet for the Bel 0ADKC /0ADKP fuses.
In it is this:
These curves don't seem correct. Notice that the curves for fuses with >= 800mA asymptotically approaches a value that doesn't match their rated current.
Is there some assumption I am unaware of? Or is this graph in error?
This isn't the case with other curves that I see, but those were fast-acting fuses and these are time-delay fuses.
For comparison these are the curves for the fast-acting Bel 0DAC/0ADAP fuses and the curves do approach the rated current.
fuses
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm looking at the datasheet for the Bel 0ADKC /0ADKP fuses.
In it is this:
These curves don't seem correct. Notice that the curves for fuses with >= 800mA asymptotically approaches a value that doesn't match their rated current.
Is there some assumption I am unaware of? Or is this graph in error?
This isn't the case with other curves that I see, but those were fast-acting fuses and these are time-delay fuses.
For comparison these are the curves for the fast-acting Bel 0DAC/0ADAP fuses and the curves do approach the rated current.
fuses
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm looking at the datasheet for the Bel 0ADKC /0ADKP fuses.
In it is this:
These curves don't seem correct. Notice that the curves for fuses with >= 800mA asymptotically approaches a value that doesn't match their rated current.
Is there some assumption I am unaware of? Or is this graph in error?
This isn't the case with other curves that I see, but those were fast-acting fuses and these are time-delay fuses.
For comparison these are the curves for the fast-acting Bel 0DAC/0ADAP fuses and the curves do approach the rated current.
fuses
$endgroup$
I'm looking at the datasheet for the Bel 0ADKC /0ADKP fuses.
In it is this:
These curves don't seem correct. Notice that the curves for fuses with >= 800mA asymptotically approaches a value that doesn't match their rated current.
Is there some assumption I am unaware of? Or is this graph in error?
This isn't the case with other curves that I see, but those were fast-acting fuses and these are time-delay fuses.
For comparison these are the curves for the fast-acting Bel 0DAC/0ADAP fuses and the curves do approach the rated current.
fuses
fuses
edited 1 hour ago
laptop2d
34.4k12 gold badges40 silver badges101 bronze badges
34.4k12 gold badges40 silver badges101 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
DKNguyenDKNguyen
4,5731 gold badge5 silver badges23 bronze badges
4,5731 gold badge5 silver badges23 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
They don't match the blow current. The graphs are the current that the fuses blow at (not the rating with one number). The reason for this being is it takes temperature to blow the fuses and then the fuse material must break down. This process does not happen instantaneously, its a phase change process. So the longer you dwell above the temperature, the more it will break down. If the current is exactly at the point of breakdown, it could take a long time to break down the fuse material down.
To really blow a fuse, you must go beyond the blow current, the more you go beyond the blow current, the faster it will blow.
It's also why currents close to the blow current should not be approached for long periods of time (like between 700mA and 800mA) as the curve probably also extends to this region but was not tested.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So I guess for slow-blow fuses they just didn't bother to test them over such a long period of time. The curves for the fast acting 0DAC/0ADAP fuses do go all the way to their rated current.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, 10000 seconds is a long time. It would be interesting to go longer
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, sorry, got the graph wrong. I swear the I've see some that go to hrs, but I could be wrong
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I actually had problems like this in a product and the fuses weren't blowing fast enough. We had to switch to a lower current fuse.
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah. Most of the time I need fuses it's to protect some power transistors from overcurrent but I think the fuses are too slow, even when you use fast-acting fuses and rate them a bit lower than the average current through the transistors (i.e. the current is expected to be peaky, but if it sits at the peaky level for too long it should blow). I could also oversize the transistors and have the fuse blow before the transistors are in danger but that's $$$.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Have a look at Littlefuse's Fuseology application guide where much of this is discussed.
The graph Y-axis is in seconds. 10,000 s is < 3 hours. A year - and I would be selecting fuses for life measured in years rather than hours - is about 32 Ms so if you extend the Y-axis by three decades (100k, 1M, 10M) and extrapolate the curves you will be close to the rated current.
Relevant highlights from the Littlefuse application guide:
CURRENT RATING: The nominal amperage value of the
fuse. It is established by the manufacturer as a value of
current which the fuse can carry, based on a controlled set
of test conditions (See RERATING).
Under the heading of Nuisance Tripping we can read:
For example, one prevalent cause of nuisance opening in
conventional power supplies is the failure to adequately
consider the fuse’s nominal melting I2t rating. The fuse
cannot be selected solely on the basis of normal operating
current and ambient temperature. In this application, the
fuse’s nominal melting I2t rating must also meet the inrush
current requirements created by the input capacitor of the
power supply’s smoothing filter.
The procedure for converting various waveforms into I2t
circuit demand is given in the FUSE SELECTION GUIDE.
For trouble-free, long-life fuse protection, it is good design
practice to select a fuse such that the I2t of the waveform
is no more than 20% of the nominal melting I2t rating of
the fuse. Refer to the section on PULSES in the FUSE
SELECTION GUIDE.
In addition when selecting a fuse you should note:
RERATING: For 25ºC ambient temperatures, it is
recommended that fuses be operated at no more than
75% of the nominal current rating established using the
controlled test conditions. These test conditions are part of
UL/CSA/ANCE (Mexico) 248-14 “Fuses for Supplementary
Overcurrent Protection,” whose primary objective is
to specify common test standards necessary for the
continued control of manufactured items intended for
protection against fire, etc.
It's an interesting subject but a read of the linked article will be worthwhile.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes those are correct. Fuses pretty much don't blow at their rated current.
I remember testing 12A fast fuse at 15A and it took a few minutes.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f448804%2fis-this-fuse-time-current-curve-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
They don't match the blow current. The graphs are the current that the fuses blow at (not the rating with one number). The reason for this being is it takes temperature to blow the fuses and then the fuse material must break down. This process does not happen instantaneously, its a phase change process. So the longer you dwell above the temperature, the more it will break down. If the current is exactly at the point of breakdown, it could take a long time to break down the fuse material down.
To really blow a fuse, you must go beyond the blow current, the more you go beyond the blow current, the faster it will blow.
It's also why currents close to the blow current should not be approached for long periods of time (like between 700mA and 800mA) as the curve probably also extends to this region but was not tested.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So I guess for slow-blow fuses they just didn't bother to test them over such a long period of time. The curves for the fast acting 0DAC/0ADAP fuses do go all the way to their rated current.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, 10000 seconds is a long time. It would be interesting to go longer
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, sorry, got the graph wrong. I swear the I've see some that go to hrs, but I could be wrong
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I actually had problems like this in a product and the fuses weren't blowing fast enough. We had to switch to a lower current fuse.
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah. Most of the time I need fuses it's to protect some power transistors from overcurrent but I think the fuses are too slow, even when you use fast-acting fuses and rate them a bit lower than the average current through the transistors (i.e. the current is expected to be peaky, but if it sits at the peaky level for too long it should blow). I could also oversize the transistors and have the fuse blow before the transistors are in danger but that's $$$.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
They don't match the blow current. The graphs are the current that the fuses blow at (not the rating with one number). The reason for this being is it takes temperature to blow the fuses and then the fuse material must break down. This process does not happen instantaneously, its a phase change process. So the longer you dwell above the temperature, the more it will break down. If the current is exactly at the point of breakdown, it could take a long time to break down the fuse material down.
To really blow a fuse, you must go beyond the blow current, the more you go beyond the blow current, the faster it will blow.
It's also why currents close to the blow current should not be approached for long periods of time (like between 700mA and 800mA) as the curve probably also extends to this region but was not tested.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So I guess for slow-blow fuses they just didn't bother to test them over such a long period of time. The curves for the fast acting 0DAC/0ADAP fuses do go all the way to their rated current.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, 10000 seconds is a long time. It would be interesting to go longer
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, sorry, got the graph wrong. I swear the I've see some that go to hrs, but I could be wrong
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I actually had problems like this in a product and the fuses weren't blowing fast enough. We had to switch to a lower current fuse.
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah. Most of the time I need fuses it's to protect some power transistors from overcurrent but I think the fuses are too slow, even when you use fast-acting fuses and rate them a bit lower than the average current through the transistors (i.e. the current is expected to be peaky, but if it sits at the peaky level for too long it should blow). I could also oversize the transistors and have the fuse blow before the transistors are in danger but that's $$$.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
They don't match the blow current. The graphs are the current that the fuses blow at (not the rating with one number). The reason for this being is it takes temperature to blow the fuses and then the fuse material must break down. This process does not happen instantaneously, its a phase change process. So the longer you dwell above the temperature, the more it will break down. If the current is exactly at the point of breakdown, it could take a long time to break down the fuse material down.
To really blow a fuse, you must go beyond the blow current, the more you go beyond the blow current, the faster it will blow.
It's also why currents close to the blow current should not be approached for long periods of time (like between 700mA and 800mA) as the curve probably also extends to this region but was not tested.
$endgroup$
They don't match the blow current. The graphs are the current that the fuses blow at (not the rating with one number). The reason for this being is it takes temperature to blow the fuses and then the fuse material must break down. This process does not happen instantaneously, its a phase change process. So the longer you dwell above the temperature, the more it will break down. If the current is exactly at the point of breakdown, it could take a long time to break down the fuse material down.
To really blow a fuse, you must go beyond the blow current, the more you go beyond the blow current, the faster it will blow.
It's also why currents close to the blow current should not be approached for long periods of time (like between 700mA and 800mA) as the curve probably also extends to this region but was not tested.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 10 hours ago
laptop2dlaptop2d
34.4k12 gold badges40 silver badges101 bronze badges
34.4k12 gold badges40 silver badges101 bronze badges
$begingroup$
So I guess for slow-blow fuses they just didn't bother to test them over such a long period of time. The curves for the fast acting 0DAC/0ADAP fuses do go all the way to their rated current.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, 10000 seconds is a long time. It would be interesting to go longer
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, sorry, got the graph wrong. I swear the I've see some that go to hrs, but I could be wrong
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I actually had problems like this in a product and the fuses weren't blowing fast enough. We had to switch to a lower current fuse.
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah. Most of the time I need fuses it's to protect some power transistors from overcurrent but I think the fuses are too slow, even when you use fast-acting fuses and rate them a bit lower than the average current through the transistors (i.e. the current is expected to be peaky, but if it sits at the peaky level for too long it should blow). I could also oversize the transistors and have the fuse blow before the transistors are in danger but that's $$$.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
So I guess for slow-blow fuses they just didn't bother to test them over such a long period of time. The curves for the fast acting 0DAC/0ADAP fuses do go all the way to their rated current.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, 10000 seconds is a long time. It would be interesting to go longer
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, sorry, got the graph wrong. I swear the I've see some that go to hrs, but I could be wrong
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I actually had problems like this in a product and the fuses weren't blowing fast enough. We had to switch to a lower current fuse.
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah. Most of the time I need fuses it's to protect some power transistors from overcurrent but I think the fuses are too slow, even when you use fast-acting fuses and rate them a bit lower than the average current through the transistors (i.e. the current is expected to be peaky, but if it sits at the peaky level for too long it should blow). I could also oversize the transistors and have the fuse blow before the transistors are in danger but that's $$$.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
So I guess for slow-blow fuses they just didn't bother to test them over such a long period of time. The curves for the fast acting 0DAC/0ADAP fuses do go all the way to their rated current.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
So I guess for slow-blow fuses they just didn't bother to test them over such a long period of time. The curves for the fast acting 0DAC/0ADAP fuses do go all the way to their rated current.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
10 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, 10000 seconds is a long time. It would be interesting to go longer
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yes, 10000 seconds is a long time. It would be interesting to go longer
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, sorry, got the graph wrong. I swear the I've see some that go to hrs, but I could be wrong
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah, sorry, got the graph wrong. I swear the I've see some that go to hrs, but I could be wrong
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I actually had problems like this in a product and the fuses weren't blowing fast enough. We had to switch to a lower current fuse.
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
I actually had problems like this in a product and the fuses weren't blowing fast enough. We had to switch to a lower current fuse.
$endgroup$
– laptop2d
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah. Most of the time I need fuses it's to protect some power transistors from overcurrent but I think the fuses are too slow, even when you use fast-acting fuses and rate them a bit lower than the average current through the transistors (i.e. the current is expected to be peaky, but if it sits at the peaky level for too long it should blow). I could also oversize the transistors and have the fuse blow before the transistors are in danger but that's $$$.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yeah. Most of the time I need fuses it's to protect some power transistors from overcurrent but I think the fuses are too slow, even when you use fast-acting fuses and rate them a bit lower than the average current through the transistors (i.e. the current is expected to be peaky, but if it sits at the peaky level for too long it should blow). I could also oversize the transistors and have the fuse blow before the transistors are in danger but that's $$$.
$endgroup$
– DKNguyen
9 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Have a look at Littlefuse's Fuseology application guide where much of this is discussed.
The graph Y-axis is in seconds. 10,000 s is < 3 hours. A year - and I would be selecting fuses for life measured in years rather than hours - is about 32 Ms so if you extend the Y-axis by three decades (100k, 1M, 10M) and extrapolate the curves you will be close to the rated current.
Relevant highlights from the Littlefuse application guide:
CURRENT RATING: The nominal amperage value of the
fuse. It is established by the manufacturer as a value of
current which the fuse can carry, based on a controlled set
of test conditions (See RERATING).
Under the heading of Nuisance Tripping we can read:
For example, one prevalent cause of nuisance opening in
conventional power supplies is the failure to adequately
consider the fuse’s nominal melting I2t rating. The fuse
cannot be selected solely on the basis of normal operating
current and ambient temperature. In this application, the
fuse’s nominal melting I2t rating must also meet the inrush
current requirements created by the input capacitor of the
power supply’s smoothing filter.
The procedure for converting various waveforms into I2t
circuit demand is given in the FUSE SELECTION GUIDE.
For trouble-free, long-life fuse protection, it is good design
practice to select a fuse such that the I2t of the waveform
is no more than 20% of the nominal melting I2t rating of
the fuse. Refer to the section on PULSES in the FUSE
SELECTION GUIDE.
In addition when selecting a fuse you should note:
RERATING: For 25ºC ambient temperatures, it is
recommended that fuses be operated at no more than
75% of the nominal current rating established using the
controlled test conditions. These test conditions are part of
UL/CSA/ANCE (Mexico) 248-14 “Fuses for Supplementary
Overcurrent Protection,” whose primary objective is
to specify common test standards necessary for the
continued control of manufactured items intended for
protection against fire, etc.
It's an interesting subject but a read of the linked article will be worthwhile.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Have a look at Littlefuse's Fuseology application guide where much of this is discussed.
The graph Y-axis is in seconds. 10,000 s is < 3 hours. A year - and I would be selecting fuses for life measured in years rather than hours - is about 32 Ms so if you extend the Y-axis by three decades (100k, 1M, 10M) and extrapolate the curves you will be close to the rated current.
Relevant highlights from the Littlefuse application guide:
CURRENT RATING: The nominal amperage value of the
fuse. It is established by the manufacturer as a value of
current which the fuse can carry, based on a controlled set
of test conditions (See RERATING).
Under the heading of Nuisance Tripping we can read:
For example, one prevalent cause of nuisance opening in
conventional power supplies is the failure to adequately
consider the fuse’s nominal melting I2t rating. The fuse
cannot be selected solely on the basis of normal operating
current and ambient temperature. In this application, the
fuse’s nominal melting I2t rating must also meet the inrush
current requirements created by the input capacitor of the
power supply’s smoothing filter.
The procedure for converting various waveforms into I2t
circuit demand is given in the FUSE SELECTION GUIDE.
For trouble-free, long-life fuse protection, it is good design
practice to select a fuse such that the I2t of the waveform
is no more than 20% of the nominal melting I2t rating of
the fuse. Refer to the section on PULSES in the FUSE
SELECTION GUIDE.
In addition when selecting a fuse you should note:
RERATING: For 25ºC ambient temperatures, it is
recommended that fuses be operated at no more than
75% of the nominal current rating established using the
controlled test conditions. These test conditions are part of
UL/CSA/ANCE (Mexico) 248-14 “Fuses for Supplementary
Overcurrent Protection,” whose primary objective is
to specify common test standards necessary for the
continued control of manufactured items intended for
protection against fire, etc.
It's an interesting subject but a read of the linked article will be worthwhile.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Have a look at Littlefuse's Fuseology application guide where much of this is discussed.
The graph Y-axis is in seconds. 10,000 s is < 3 hours. A year - and I would be selecting fuses for life measured in years rather than hours - is about 32 Ms so if you extend the Y-axis by three decades (100k, 1M, 10M) and extrapolate the curves you will be close to the rated current.
Relevant highlights from the Littlefuse application guide:
CURRENT RATING: The nominal amperage value of the
fuse. It is established by the manufacturer as a value of
current which the fuse can carry, based on a controlled set
of test conditions (See RERATING).
Under the heading of Nuisance Tripping we can read:
For example, one prevalent cause of nuisance opening in
conventional power supplies is the failure to adequately
consider the fuse’s nominal melting I2t rating. The fuse
cannot be selected solely on the basis of normal operating
current and ambient temperature. In this application, the
fuse’s nominal melting I2t rating must also meet the inrush
current requirements created by the input capacitor of the
power supply’s smoothing filter.
The procedure for converting various waveforms into I2t
circuit demand is given in the FUSE SELECTION GUIDE.
For trouble-free, long-life fuse protection, it is good design
practice to select a fuse such that the I2t of the waveform
is no more than 20% of the nominal melting I2t rating of
the fuse. Refer to the section on PULSES in the FUSE
SELECTION GUIDE.
In addition when selecting a fuse you should note:
RERATING: For 25ºC ambient temperatures, it is
recommended that fuses be operated at no more than
75% of the nominal current rating established using the
controlled test conditions. These test conditions are part of
UL/CSA/ANCE (Mexico) 248-14 “Fuses for Supplementary
Overcurrent Protection,” whose primary objective is
to specify common test standards necessary for the
continued control of manufactured items intended for
protection against fire, etc.
It's an interesting subject but a read of the linked article will be worthwhile.
$endgroup$
Have a look at Littlefuse's Fuseology application guide where much of this is discussed.
The graph Y-axis is in seconds. 10,000 s is < 3 hours. A year - and I would be selecting fuses for life measured in years rather than hours - is about 32 Ms so if you extend the Y-axis by three decades (100k, 1M, 10M) and extrapolate the curves you will be close to the rated current.
Relevant highlights from the Littlefuse application guide:
CURRENT RATING: The nominal amperage value of the
fuse. It is established by the manufacturer as a value of
current which the fuse can carry, based on a controlled set
of test conditions (See RERATING).
Under the heading of Nuisance Tripping we can read:
For example, one prevalent cause of nuisance opening in
conventional power supplies is the failure to adequately
consider the fuse’s nominal melting I2t rating. The fuse
cannot be selected solely on the basis of normal operating
current and ambient temperature. In this application, the
fuse’s nominal melting I2t rating must also meet the inrush
current requirements created by the input capacitor of the
power supply’s smoothing filter.
The procedure for converting various waveforms into I2t
circuit demand is given in the FUSE SELECTION GUIDE.
For trouble-free, long-life fuse protection, it is good design
practice to select a fuse such that the I2t of the waveform
is no more than 20% of the nominal melting I2t rating of
the fuse. Refer to the section on PULSES in the FUSE
SELECTION GUIDE.
In addition when selecting a fuse you should note:
RERATING: For 25ºC ambient temperatures, it is
recommended that fuses be operated at no more than
75% of the nominal current rating established using the
controlled test conditions. These test conditions are part of
UL/CSA/ANCE (Mexico) 248-14 “Fuses for Supplementary
Overcurrent Protection,” whose primary objective is
to specify common test standards necessary for the
continued control of manufactured items intended for
protection against fire, etc.
It's an interesting subject but a read of the linked article will be worthwhile.
answered 9 hours ago
TransistorTransistor
95.5k8 gold badges95 silver badges209 bronze badges
95.5k8 gold badges95 silver badges209 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes those are correct. Fuses pretty much don't blow at their rated current.
I remember testing 12A fast fuse at 15A and it took a few minutes.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes those are correct. Fuses pretty much don't blow at their rated current.
I remember testing 12A fast fuse at 15A and it took a few minutes.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes those are correct. Fuses pretty much don't blow at their rated current.
I remember testing 12A fast fuse at 15A and it took a few minutes.
New contributor
$endgroup$
Yes those are correct. Fuses pretty much don't blow at their rated current.
I remember testing 12A fast fuse at 15A and it took a few minutes.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 9 hours ago
morzhmorzh
162 bronze badges
162 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f448804%2fis-this-fuse-time-current-curve-wrong%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown