Can't understand an ACT practice problem: Triangle appears to be isosceles, why isn't the answer 7.3~ here?Calculate depth using triginometrySine Law Homework QuestionIs it possible to solve for the unknown sides and angles in the top triangle?How can $sin(pi)$ = 0 without breaking a bunch of math rules?Are all triangles isosceles?Problem on Trigonometry and Similar trianglesArea of a regular hexagon via area of trianglesUsing the Law of Cosines results in an “invalid” answer, why?Altitude of a Triangle: Showing indeed perpendicularSo, I just learned about the “ambiguous” case of the law of sines.

What is the reason behind water not falling from a bucket at the top of loop?

How is Sword Coast North governed?

What sort of solar system / atmospheric conditions, if any, would allow for a very cold planet that still receives plenty of light from its sun?

Move label of an angle in Tikz

Why do player start with fighting for the corners in go?

Protect a 6 inch air hose from physical damage

Word to describe someone doing something even though told not to

Why do my fried eggs start browning very fast?

What do the screens say after you are set free?

How were x-ray diffraction patterns deciphered before computers?

Is verification of a blockchain computationally cheaper than recreating it?

How does Rust's 128-bit integer `i128` work on a 64-bit system?

If a Shadow Magic sorcerer casts Darkness using the Eyes of the Dark feature, can they cast another spell that requires concentration?

Backpacking with incontinence

Python π = 1 + (1/2) + (1/3) + (1/4) - (1/5) + (1/6) + (1/7) + (1/8) + (1/9) - (1/10) ...1748 Euler

speaker impedence

Can I say "Gesundheit" if someone is coughing?

What's the proper way of indicating that a car has reached its destination during a dialogue?

How to power down external drive safely

Deflecting lasers with lightsabers

How did Biff return to 2015 from 1955 without a lightning strike?

When did J.K. Rowling decide to make Ron and Hermione a couple?

Pre-Greek θάλασσα "thalassa" and Turkish talaz

What is the difference between 2/4 and 4/4 when it comes the accented beats?



Can't understand an ACT practice problem: Triangle appears to be isosceles, why isn't the answer 7.3~ here?


Calculate depth using triginometrySine Law Homework QuestionIs it possible to solve for the unknown sides and angles in the top triangle?How can $sin(pi)$ = 0 without breaking a bunch of math rules?Are all triangles isosceles?Problem on Trigonometry and Similar trianglesArea of a regular hexagon via area of trianglesUsing the Law of Cosines results in an “invalid” answer, why?Altitude of a Triangle: Showing indeed perpendicularSo, I just learned about the “ambiguous” case of the law of sines.






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


In the following picture, XY = YZ. The angle a = 40 degrees, and the length opposite is 5.



enter image description here



The problem asks to compute XY



We immediately dropped the dotted perpendicular and get two right triangles.
The length of the bottom is 2.5 in each right triangle, and therefore
$a/2 = 20^circ$



$sin 20 = 2.5 / XY$ or, $XY = 2.5 / sin 20 approx 7.3$



Their answer uses $5 / a = XY / 70$



$5 / 40 = XY / 70$
$XY = 350/40 = 8.75$



I would have thought both these answers should be the same, where did we go wrong?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
    $endgroup$
    – Gnumbertester
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago

















3












$begingroup$


In the following picture, XY = YZ. The angle a = 40 degrees, and the length opposite is 5.



enter image description here



The problem asks to compute XY



We immediately dropped the dotted perpendicular and get two right triangles.
The length of the bottom is 2.5 in each right triangle, and therefore
$a/2 = 20^circ$



$sin 20 = 2.5 / XY$ or, $XY = 2.5 / sin 20 approx 7.3$



Their answer uses $5 / a = XY / 70$



$5 / 40 = XY / 70$
$XY = 350/40 = 8.75$



I would have thought both these answers should be the same, where did we go wrong?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
    $endgroup$
    – Gnumbertester
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


In the following picture, XY = YZ. The angle a = 40 degrees, and the length opposite is 5.



enter image description here



The problem asks to compute XY



We immediately dropped the dotted perpendicular and get two right triangles.
The length of the bottom is 2.5 in each right triangle, and therefore
$a/2 = 20^circ$



$sin 20 = 2.5 / XY$ or, $XY = 2.5 / sin 20 approx 7.3$



Their answer uses $5 / a = XY / 70$



$5 / 40 = XY / 70$
$XY = 350/40 = 8.75$



I would have thought both these answers should be the same, where did we go wrong?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In the following picture, XY = YZ. The angle a = 40 degrees, and the length opposite is 5.



enter image description here



The problem asks to compute XY



We immediately dropped the dotted perpendicular and get two right triangles.
The length of the bottom is 2.5 in each right triangle, and therefore
$a/2 = 20^circ$



$sin 20 = 2.5 / XY$ or, $XY = 2.5 / sin 20 approx 7.3$



Their answer uses $5 / a = XY / 70$



$5 / 40 = XY / 70$
$XY = 350/40 = 8.75$



I would have thought both these answers should be the same, where did we go wrong?







geometry trigonometry fake-proofs






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









N. Bar

6091 silver badge17 bronze badges




6091 silver badge17 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









DovDov

1829 bronze badges




1829 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
    $endgroup$
    – Gnumbertester
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – Ross Millikan
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
    $endgroup$
    – Gnumbertester
    9 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago















$begingroup$
Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Get another book. NOW! The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XY70$ is ... baseless. It seems like they want to use the law of sins that says $frac 5sin a = frac xysin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as yours.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Their statement $5/40=XY/70$ is unjustified and wrong.
$endgroup$
– Ross Millikan
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
$endgroup$
– Gnumbertester
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Which book is this? I have an ACT book and I want to make sure it's not the same one?
$endgroup$
– Gnumbertester
9 hours ago












$begingroup$
The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
The book is probably going for the law of sines that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. But that the book would make such a typo and then actually calculate based on that typo does not speak well for the text. The OP was correct and the book was dead wrong.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

Get another book.



NOW!



The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XYangle 70$ is ... baseless.



There's no such similarity between triangle sides and the direct measure of angles. It's .... stupid... to think there would be.



But there is a similarity between sides and the SINES of angles.



I.e. The law of sines which would allow us to note:



that $frac 5sin a = frac XYsin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as your answer.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
    $endgroup$
    – Dov
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago



















4












$begingroup$

$$XY=frac2.5sin20^circ=7.3095...$$
Another way:



$$fracXYsin70^circ=frac5sin40^circ,$$ which gives the same result:
$$XY=frac5sin70^circsin40^circ=7.3095...$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
    $endgroup$
    – Dov
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dov I added something. See now.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
    $endgroup$
    – Dave L. Renfro
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3312660%2fcant-understand-an-act-practice-problem-triangle-appears-to-be-isosceles-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7












$begingroup$

Get another book.



NOW!



The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XYangle 70$ is ... baseless.



There's no such similarity between triangle sides and the direct measure of angles. It's .... stupid... to think there would be.



But there is a similarity between sides and the SINES of angles.



I.e. The law of sines which would allow us to note:



that $frac 5sin a = frac XYsin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as your answer.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
    $endgroup$
    – Dov
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago
















7












$begingroup$

Get another book.



NOW!



The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XYangle 70$ is ... baseless.



There's no such similarity between triangle sides and the direct measure of angles. It's .... stupid... to think there would be.



But there is a similarity between sides and the SINES of angles.



I.e. The law of sines which would allow us to note:



that $frac 5sin a = frac XYsin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as your answer.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
    $endgroup$
    – Dov
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago














7












7








7





$begingroup$

Get another book.



NOW!



The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XYangle 70$ is ... baseless.



There's no such similarity between triangle sides and the direct measure of angles. It's .... stupid... to think there would be.



But there is a similarity between sides and the SINES of angles.



I.e. The law of sines which would allow us to note:



that $frac 5sin a = frac XYsin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as your answer.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Get another book.



NOW!



The books answer that $frac 5angle a = frac XYangle 70$ is ... baseless.



There's no such similarity between triangle sides and the direct measure of angles. It's .... stupid... to think there would be.



But there is a similarity between sides and the SINES of angles.



I.e. The law of sines which would allow us to note:



that $frac 5sin a = frac XYsin 70$ or $frac 5sin 40=frac XYsin 70$ so $XY =5*fracsin 70sin 40 approx 7.3$. Which ... is the same as your answer.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 9 hours ago









fleabloodfleablood

77.5k2 gold badges28 silver badges95 bronze badges




77.5k2 gold badges28 silver badges95 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
    $endgroup$
    – Dov
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
    $endgroup$
    – Dov
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
$endgroup$
– Dov
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thanks! I thought I was losing my mind. Now I know that's true, but at least you showed us what was going on. And my son can go on to other problems.
$endgroup$
– Dov
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
I might be being a little harsh on the book. But the book made a typo of $frac 540 = frac xy70$ instead of $frac 5sin 40=frac xysin 70$. That's bad, but... we all make errors. But then the book made a miscalculation based on the typo. That's .... worse. I'm not sure how condemning I should be but that's the thing that should be caught. ... anyway the harm such an error can make in the utter confusion and errors it would cause and teach the students reading it is ... tragic.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago














4












$begingroup$

$$XY=frac2.5sin20^circ=7.3095...$$
Another way:



$$fracXYsin70^circ=frac5sin40^circ,$$ which gives the same result:
$$XY=frac5sin70^circsin40^circ=7.3095...$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
    $endgroup$
    – Dov
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dov I added something. See now.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
    $endgroup$
    – Dave L. Renfro
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago















4












$begingroup$

$$XY=frac2.5sin20^circ=7.3095...$$
Another way:



$$fracXYsin70^circ=frac5sin40^circ,$$ which gives the same result:
$$XY=frac5sin70^circsin40^circ=7.3095...$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
    $endgroup$
    – Dov
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dov I added something. See now.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
    $endgroup$
    – Dave L. Renfro
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

$$XY=frac2.5sin20^circ=7.3095...$$
Another way:



$$fracXYsin70^circ=frac5sin40^circ,$$ which gives the same result:
$$XY=frac5sin70^circsin40^circ=7.3095...$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



$$XY=frac2.5sin20^circ=7.3095...$$
Another way:



$$fracXYsin70^circ=frac5sin40^circ,$$ which gives the same result:
$$XY=frac5sin70^circsin40^circ=7.3095...$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 9 hours ago

























answered 9 hours ago









Michael RozenbergMichael Rozenberg

123k20 gold badges105 silver badges210 bronze badges




123k20 gold badges105 silver badges210 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
    $endgroup$
    – Dov
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dov I added something. See now.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
    $endgroup$
    – Dave L. Renfro
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
    $endgroup$
    – Dov
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @Dov I added something. See now.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Rozenberg
    9 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
    $endgroup$
    – Dave L. Renfro
    9 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    9 hours ago















$begingroup$
which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
$endgroup$
– Dov
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
which is wrong according to the answer... The other way of computing it using law of signs gets us 8.75, what's going on?
$endgroup$
– Dov
9 hours ago













$begingroup$
@Dov I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Dov I added something. See now.
$endgroup$
– Michael Rozenberg
9 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
@Dov: In the second approach, you've left off the sines in using the law of sines. (Which I now see that Rozenberg included in his answer as I was writing my comment.)
$endgroup$
– Dave L. Renfro
9 hours ago













$begingroup$
It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago




$begingroup$
It's the law of "sines" not "signs". So it would state that $frac 5sin 40 = frac XYsin 70$. To misquote it, as the book did, as $frac 540 = frac XY70$ is just plain wrong as $x ne sin x$.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
9 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3312660%2fcant-understand-an-act-practice-problem-triangle-appears-to-be-isosceles-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)