Did the Cheela on Dragon's Egg have twelve-stranded “DNA”?“There were either twelve sexes or none.”Did they ever deal with non-relativistic kinematics on Dragon's Egg?

Where can/should I, as a high schooler, publish a paper regarding the derivation of a formula?

Are the A380 engines interchangeable (given they are not all equipped with reverse)?

Another solution to create a set with two conditions

Architectural feasibility of a tiered circular stone keep

What verb is かまされる?

How do we calculate energy of food?

Can RMSE and MAE have the same value?

Heyacrazy: No Diagonals

How do I get toddlers to stop asking for food every hour?

Could George I (of Great Britain) speak English?

Is it okay to keep opened loose leaf tea packages in the freezer?

Showing that the limit of non-eigenvector goes to infinity

Two questions about typesetting a Roman missal

What is the difference between "Grippe" and "Männergrippe"?

How to find out the average duration of the peer-review process for a given journal?

What is the best type of paint to paint a shipping container?

Do Bayesian credible intervals treat the estimated parameter as a random variable?

Non-visual Computers - thoughts?

How do you harvest carrots in creative mode?

The No-Free-Lunch Theorem and K-NN consistency

How do I prevent other wifi networks from showing up on my computer?

Why do all fields in a QFT transform like *irreducible* representations of some group?

Do they have Supervillain(s)?

How long do you think advanced cybernetic implants would plausibly last?



Did the Cheela on Dragon's Egg have twelve-stranded “DNA”?


“There were either twelve sexes or none.”Did they ever deal with non-relativistic kinematics on Dragon's Egg?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.



I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?



Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?










share|improve this question
































    4















    The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.



    I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?



    Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?










    share|improve this question




























      4












      4








      4








      The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.



      I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?



      Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?










      share|improve this question
















      The answer to my question “There were either twelve sexes or none.” explains that there were actually either five sexes or none.



      I remember being confused at the time how DNA (or similar genetic material) would work with multiple sexes, but where did the twelve come from?



      Is it possible that in the intervening years I mixed it up with twelve-stranded DNA-like genetic material from the Cheela on Dragon's Egg?







      genetics dragons-egg






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago







      uhoh

















      asked 9 hours ago









      uhohuhoh

      2,34514 silver badges47 bronze badges




      2,34514 silver badges47 bronze badges























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3















          There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.



          Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:




          The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
          through.




          I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.



          On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:




          The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.



          From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.







          share|improve this answer

























          • okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

            – uhoh
            8 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "186"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217966%2fdid-the-cheela-on-dragons-egg-have-twelve-stranded-dna%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3















          There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.



          Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:




          The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
          through.




          I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.



          On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:




          The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.



          From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.







          share|improve this answer

























          • okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

            – uhoh
            8 hours ago















          3















          There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.



          Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:




          The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
          through.




          I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.



          On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:




          The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.



          From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.







          share|improve this answer

























          • okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

            – uhoh
            8 hours ago













          3














          3










          3









          There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.



          Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:




          The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
          through.




          I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.



          On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:




          The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.



          From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.







          share|improve this answer













          There is no mention of twelve-stranded DNA in the book.



          Cheela biology is described in some technical detail:




          The cheela biophysicists would not determine the genetic coding mechanism for the cheela for dozens of generations, but when they did, both they and the humans would be surprised at how different it was. Because of the high temperatures on the neutron star that attempted to disrupt everything into random chaos, and the all-pervasive magnetic field that lined everything up along the magnetic field lines, the cheela genetic structure was a triply-redundant linear strand of complex nuclear molecules. As the duplicating enzymes would copy the genetic molecule, the check at each triply redundant site provided an automatically correcting copying mechanism; if one of the three linear strands had mutated, the copying enzyme would be governed by majority rule, and the new triple strand would have the mutation corrected. If two mutations had occurred and all three sites were different, the enzyme would self-destruct, taking the faulty gene with it. It was only when the two mutations were the same that an error was able to creep
          through.




          I don't know enough biology to understand all this, but it seems to be three strands rather than twelve.



          On the other hand, the number twelve does show up a lot in more obvious parts of the cheela body. From the Technical Appendix:




          The cheela use a base 12 number system (they have twelve eyes) and their next unit of time after the turn is a great of turns or 144 turns. They occasionally use a dozen turns, but it has never had the same significance as the week does to humans. A great of turns is 28.7 seconds, while a human year is 31.6 million seconds. The ratio of a human year to a cheela great of turns is 1.1 million to one.



          From studying the history of the cheela we have learned that a cheela spends about 12 greats (six minutes) as a hatchling; 12 greats as a young apprentice, 30 greats (15 minutes) as a worker, 12 greats as an Old One tending eggs and hatchlings, then the rest of its life (maximum of 24 greats or 12 minutes) as an Aged One. All of these indications lead to the conclusion that the effective relative time scale between the cheela and humans is approximately one million to one.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 8 hours ago









          Rand al'ThorRand al'Thor

          102k47 gold badges491 silver badges685 bronze badges




          102k47 gold badges491 silver badges685 bronze badges















          • okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

            – uhoh
            8 hours ago

















          • okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

            – uhoh
            8 hours ago
















          okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

          – uhoh
          8 hours ago





          okay, triply-redundant, not twelve-stranded. But I think they did use at least some of those twelve eyestalks during DNA exchanges.

          – uhoh
          8 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f217966%2fdid-the-cheela-on-dragons-egg-have-twelve-stranded-dna%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

          Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

          19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу