If two Lore Bards used the Cutting Words feature on an ability check or attack, would they stack?When a creature is hit with more than one fireball simultaneously, do they take damage from all of them?Can a Lore bard's Cutting Words feature cancel a critical hit?Does Cutting Words reduce the damage taken by every target of an AoE spell or attack?How much does a bard know when they decide to use Cutting Words?How can a DM deal with abilities that affect how an attack roll is resolved?What part of a multi-type damage roll is reduced by a non-type-specific effect?Can a Lore bard use Cutting Words against the attack roll/ability check of a sorcerer's Subtle spell?Can Sentinel at Death's Door and Cutting Words combine to make a critical hit miss?What happens when two opposing instances of Bend Luck are applied to the same roll by multiple Wild Magic sorcerers?Can either the Nondetection or Mind Blank spells prevent information about oneself being divined from others through the Legend Lore spell?

What are some interesting features that are common cross-linguistically but don't exist in English?

Lost property on Portuguese trains

How do I make my image comply with the requirements of this photography competition?

Does this VCO produce a sine wave or square wave

How much does Commander Data weigh?

I don't have the theoretical background in my PhD topic. I can't justify getting the degree

Showing that the limit of non-eigenvector goes to infinity

Did anyone try to find the little box that held Professor Moriarty and his wife after the crash?

If two Lore Bards used the Cutting Words feature on an ability check or attack, would they stack?

Prove your innocence

Is "The life is beautiful" incorrect or just very non-idiomatic?

Duplicate Files

If an earthquake can destroy buildings why it cant kill us according to physics?

Why are non-collision-resistant hash functions considered insecure for signing self-generated information

Transposing from C to Cm?

Why do banks “park” their money at the European Central Bank?

Two questions about typesetting a Roman missal

Uri tokenizer as a simple state machine

Why doesn't 'd /= d' throw a division by zero exception?

What is the best type of paint to paint a shipping container?

How do I get toddlers to stop asking for food every hour?

Are modern clipless shoes and pedals that much better than toe clips and straps?

Duplicate instruments in unison in an orchestra

How would a Creature that needs to be seen by Humans evolve?



If two Lore Bards used the Cutting Words feature on an ability check or attack, would they stack?


When a creature is hit with more than one fireball simultaneously, do they take damage from all of them?Can a Lore bard's Cutting Words feature cancel a critical hit?Does Cutting Words reduce the damage taken by every target of an AoE spell or attack?How much does a bard know when they decide to use Cutting Words?How can a DM deal with abilities that affect how an attack roll is resolved?What part of a multi-type damage roll is reduced by a non-type-specific effect?Can a Lore bard use Cutting Words against the attack roll/ability check of a sorcerer's Subtle spell?Can Sentinel at Death's Door and Cutting Words combine to make a critical hit miss?What happens when two opposing instances of Bend Luck are applied to the same roll by multiple Wild Magic sorcerers?Can either the Nondetection or Mind Blank spells prevent information about oneself being divined from others through the Legend Lore spell?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








9












$begingroup$


Let's say the party had two Lore Bards, and both used Cutting Words on a creature who tried to attack.



Does that stack, since they are separate penalties and not enduring effects (like bless)? Or would it still fall under the "same name features don't stack" rule?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




















    9












    $begingroup$


    Let's say the party had two Lore Bards, and both used Cutting Words on a creature who tried to attack.



    Does that stack, since they are separate penalties and not enduring effects (like bless)? Or would it still fall under the "same name features don't stack" rule?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      9












      9








      9


      1



      $begingroup$


      Let's say the party had two Lore Bards, and both used Cutting Words on a creature who tried to attack.



      Does that stack, since they are separate penalties and not enduring effects (like bless)? Or would it still fall under the "same name features don't stack" rule?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let's say the party had two Lore Bards, and both used Cutting Words on a creature who tried to attack.



      Does that stack, since they are separate penalties and not enduring effects (like bless)? Or would it still fall under the "same name features don't stack" rule?







      dnd-5e class-feature bard stacking simultaneous-effects






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 32 mins ago









      V2Blast

      33.8k5 gold badges123 silver badges212 bronze badges




      33.8k5 gold badges123 silver badges212 bronze badges










      asked 11 hours ago









      CyanicCyanic

      6141 silver badge18 bronze badges




      6141 silver badge18 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5













          $begingroup$

          They would stack because they have no duration



          The rules on stacking/combining game effects states (page 252):




          [W]hen two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them — the most potent one — apply while the durations of the effects overlap




          I would argue that modifiers to rolls do not actually have a duration and so they cannot actually overlap, so the clause about stacking effects won't apply.



          This is similar to the answer to a similar question about simultaneous fireballs which argues that you would take damage twice because the spells (and their damage) are instantaneous effects without duration.



          Similarly the modifier of Cutting Words does not have any sort of persisting effect that you could call a duration, it simply happens.



          Because modifiers do not have a duration and nothing with a duration is causing the modifiers to occur (such as with the bless spell) two uses of Cutting Words can combine against a single attack.




          A small additional note:

          The actual applications of Cutting Words are not even happening at the same time. Though they would result from the same trigger the optional rules on simultaneous events from Xanathar's states:




          If two or more things happen at the same time on a character or monster's turn, the person at the game table-whether player or DM-who controls that creature decides the order in which those things happen. For example, if two effects occur at the end of a player character's turn, the player decides which of the two effects happens first.




          This means that the modifiers from Cutting Words would not actually get applied at the same time, it would be one and then the other. So even if instantaneous were a duration the use of this rule would make it so that those durations were not overlapping and thus the stacking effects rule would not apply.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
            $endgroup$
            – J. A. Streich
            9 hours ago



















          2













          $begingroup$

          Combining Effects



          No, the rule for Combining Game Effects says that s of the same name don't stack effects while they overlap.




          “Different game features can
          affect a target at the same time. But when two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them—the most potent one—apply while the durations of the effects overlap. For example, if a target is ignited by a fire elemental’s Fire Form trait, the ongoing fire damage doesn’t increase if the burning target is subjected to that trait again. Game features include spells,
          class features, feats, racial traits, monster abilities, and magic items. See the related rule in the ‘Combining Magical Effects’ section of chapter 10 in the Player’s Handbook.




          Similar to the fire example, Cutting Words reads:




          you learn how to use your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others.




          You shouldn't be able to become "more distracted and confused" on a single attack.



          But it is Instantaneous



          Now, Cutting Words doesn't have a duration, but in the case of cutting words they are happening at the same time, so they are clearly over lapping as they are both happening when the attack is happening (not just same round 6 seconds, but as the effect is landing). It would be hard to argue that they aren't happening at the same time as they are both reactions to the same split second action.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
            $endgroup$
            – Allan Mills
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
            $endgroup$
            – Medix2
            7 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154105%2fif-two-lore-bards-used-the-cutting-words-feature-on-an-ability-check-or-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          5













          $begingroup$

          They would stack because they have no duration



          The rules on stacking/combining game effects states (page 252):




          [W]hen two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them — the most potent one — apply while the durations of the effects overlap




          I would argue that modifiers to rolls do not actually have a duration and so they cannot actually overlap, so the clause about stacking effects won't apply.



          This is similar to the answer to a similar question about simultaneous fireballs which argues that you would take damage twice because the spells (and their damage) are instantaneous effects without duration.



          Similarly the modifier of Cutting Words does not have any sort of persisting effect that you could call a duration, it simply happens.



          Because modifiers do not have a duration and nothing with a duration is causing the modifiers to occur (such as with the bless spell) two uses of Cutting Words can combine against a single attack.




          A small additional note:

          The actual applications of Cutting Words are not even happening at the same time. Though they would result from the same trigger the optional rules on simultaneous events from Xanathar's states:




          If two or more things happen at the same time on a character or monster's turn, the person at the game table-whether player or DM-who controls that creature decides the order in which those things happen. For example, if two effects occur at the end of a player character's turn, the player decides which of the two effects happens first.




          This means that the modifiers from Cutting Words would not actually get applied at the same time, it would be one and then the other. So even if instantaneous were a duration the use of this rule would make it so that those durations were not overlapping and thus the stacking effects rule would not apply.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
            $endgroup$
            – J. A. Streich
            9 hours ago
















          5













          $begingroup$

          They would stack because they have no duration



          The rules on stacking/combining game effects states (page 252):




          [W]hen two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them — the most potent one — apply while the durations of the effects overlap




          I would argue that modifiers to rolls do not actually have a duration and so they cannot actually overlap, so the clause about stacking effects won't apply.



          This is similar to the answer to a similar question about simultaneous fireballs which argues that you would take damage twice because the spells (and their damage) are instantaneous effects without duration.



          Similarly the modifier of Cutting Words does not have any sort of persisting effect that you could call a duration, it simply happens.



          Because modifiers do not have a duration and nothing with a duration is causing the modifiers to occur (such as with the bless spell) two uses of Cutting Words can combine against a single attack.




          A small additional note:

          The actual applications of Cutting Words are not even happening at the same time. Though they would result from the same trigger the optional rules on simultaneous events from Xanathar's states:




          If two or more things happen at the same time on a character or monster's turn, the person at the game table-whether player or DM-who controls that creature decides the order in which those things happen. For example, if two effects occur at the end of a player character's turn, the player decides which of the two effects happens first.




          This means that the modifiers from Cutting Words would not actually get applied at the same time, it would be one and then the other. So even if instantaneous were a duration the use of this rule would make it so that those durations were not overlapping and thus the stacking effects rule would not apply.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
            $endgroup$
            – J. A. Streich
            9 hours ago














          5














          5










          5







          $begingroup$

          They would stack because they have no duration



          The rules on stacking/combining game effects states (page 252):




          [W]hen two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them — the most potent one — apply while the durations of the effects overlap




          I would argue that modifiers to rolls do not actually have a duration and so they cannot actually overlap, so the clause about stacking effects won't apply.



          This is similar to the answer to a similar question about simultaneous fireballs which argues that you would take damage twice because the spells (and their damage) are instantaneous effects without duration.



          Similarly the modifier of Cutting Words does not have any sort of persisting effect that you could call a duration, it simply happens.



          Because modifiers do not have a duration and nothing with a duration is causing the modifiers to occur (such as with the bless spell) two uses of Cutting Words can combine against a single attack.




          A small additional note:

          The actual applications of Cutting Words are not even happening at the same time. Though they would result from the same trigger the optional rules on simultaneous events from Xanathar's states:




          If two or more things happen at the same time on a character or monster's turn, the person at the game table-whether player or DM-who controls that creature decides the order in which those things happen. For example, if two effects occur at the end of a player character's turn, the player decides which of the two effects happens first.




          This means that the modifiers from Cutting Words would not actually get applied at the same time, it would be one and then the other. So even if instantaneous were a duration the use of this rule would make it so that those durations were not overlapping and thus the stacking effects rule would not apply.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          They would stack because they have no duration



          The rules on stacking/combining game effects states (page 252):




          [W]hen two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them — the most potent one — apply while the durations of the effects overlap




          I would argue that modifiers to rolls do not actually have a duration and so they cannot actually overlap, so the clause about stacking effects won't apply.



          This is similar to the answer to a similar question about simultaneous fireballs which argues that you would take damage twice because the spells (and their damage) are instantaneous effects without duration.



          Similarly the modifier of Cutting Words does not have any sort of persisting effect that you could call a duration, it simply happens.



          Because modifiers do not have a duration and nothing with a duration is causing the modifiers to occur (such as with the bless spell) two uses of Cutting Words can combine against a single attack.




          A small additional note:

          The actual applications of Cutting Words are not even happening at the same time. Though they would result from the same trigger the optional rules on simultaneous events from Xanathar's states:




          If two or more things happen at the same time on a character or monster's turn, the person at the game table-whether player or DM-who controls that creature decides the order in which those things happen. For example, if two effects occur at the end of a player character's turn, the player decides which of the two effects happens first.




          This means that the modifiers from Cutting Words would not actually get applied at the same time, it would be one and then the other. So even if instantaneous were a duration the use of this rule would make it so that those durations were not overlapping and thus the stacking effects rule would not apply.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 7 hours ago

























          answered 10 hours ago









          Medix2Medix2

          7,4762 gold badges20 silver badges80 bronze badges




          7,4762 gold badges20 silver badges80 bronze badges










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
            $endgroup$
            – J. A. Streich
            9 hours ago













          • 1




            $begingroup$
            OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
            $endgroup$
            – J. A. Streich
            9 hours ago








          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
          $endgroup$
          – J. A. Streich
          9 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          OOOOoooo.... that is something I didn't think about. Feels broken, but you might be technically correct ("the best kind of correct" - Futurama).
          $endgroup$
          – J. A. Streich
          9 hours ago














          2













          $begingroup$

          Combining Effects



          No, the rule for Combining Game Effects says that s of the same name don't stack effects while they overlap.




          “Different game features can
          affect a target at the same time. But when two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them—the most potent one—apply while the durations of the effects overlap. For example, if a target is ignited by a fire elemental’s Fire Form trait, the ongoing fire damage doesn’t increase if the burning target is subjected to that trait again. Game features include spells,
          class features, feats, racial traits, monster abilities, and magic items. See the related rule in the ‘Combining Magical Effects’ section of chapter 10 in the Player’s Handbook.




          Similar to the fire example, Cutting Words reads:




          you learn how to use your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others.




          You shouldn't be able to become "more distracted and confused" on a single attack.



          But it is Instantaneous



          Now, Cutting Words doesn't have a duration, but in the case of cutting words they are happening at the same time, so they are clearly over lapping as they are both happening when the attack is happening (not just same round 6 seconds, but as the effect is landing). It would be hard to argue that they aren't happening at the same time as they are both reactions to the same split second action.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
            $endgroup$
            – Allan Mills
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
            $endgroup$
            – Medix2
            7 hours ago















          2













          $begingroup$

          Combining Effects



          No, the rule for Combining Game Effects says that s of the same name don't stack effects while they overlap.




          “Different game features can
          affect a target at the same time. But when two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them—the most potent one—apply while the durations of the effects overlap. For example, if a target is ignited by a fire elemental’s Fire Form trait, the ongoing fire damage doesn’t increase if the burning target is subjected to that trait again. Game features include spells,
          class features, feats, racial traits, monster abilities, and magic items. See the related rule in the ‘Combining Magical Effects’ section of chapter 10 in the Player’s Handbook.




          Similar to the fire example, Cutting Words reads:




          you learn how to use your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others.




          You shouldn't be able to become "more distracted and confused" on a single attack.



          But it is Instantaneous



          Now, Cutting Words doesn't have a duration, but in the case of cutting words they are happening at the same time, so they are clearly over lapping as they are both happening when the attack is happening (not just same round 6 seconds, but as the effect is landing). It would be hard to argue that they aren't happening at the same time as they are both reactions to the same split second action.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
            $endgroup$
            – Allan Mills
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
            $endgroup$
            – Medix2
            7 hours ago













          2














          2










          2







          $begingroup$

          Combining Effects



          No, the rule for Combining Game Effects says that s of the same name don't stack effects while they overlap.




          “Different game features can
          affect a target at the same time. But when two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them—the most potent one—apply while the durations of the effects overlap. For example, if a target is ignited by a fire elemental’s Fire Form trait, the ongoing fire damage doesn’t increase if the burning target is subjected to that trait again. Game features include spells,
          class features, feats, racial traits, monster abilities, and magic items. See the related rule in the ‘Combining Magical Effects’ section of chapter 10 in the Player’s Handbook.




          Similar to the fire example, Cutting Words reads:




          you learn how to use your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others.




          You shouldn't be able to become "more distracted and confused" on a single attack.



          But it is Instantaneous



          Now, Cutting Words doesn't have a duration, but in the case of cutting words they are happening at the same time, so they are clearly over lapping as they are both happening when the attack is happening (not just same round 6 seconds, but as the effect is landing). It would be hard to argue that they aren't happening at the same time as they are both reactions to the same split second action.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Combining Effects



          No, the rule for Combining Game Effects says that s of the same name don't stack effects while they overlap.




          “Different game features can
          affect a target at the same time. But when two or more game features have the same name, only the effects of one of them—the most potent one—apply while the durations of the effects overlap. For example, if a target is ignited by a fire elemental’s Fire Form trait, the ongoing fire damage doesn’t increase if the burning target is subjected to that trait again. Game features include spells,
          class features, feats, racial traits, monster abilities, and magic items. See the related rule in the ‘Combining Magical Effects’ section of chapter 10 in the Player’s Handbook.




          Similar to the fire example, Cutting Words reads:




          you learn how to use your wit to distract, confuse, and otherwise sap the confidence and competence of others.




          You shouldn't be able to become "more distracted and confused" on a single attack.



          But it is Instantaneous



          Now, Cutting Words doesn't have a duration, but in the case of cutting words they are happening at the same time, so they are clearly over lapping as they are both happening when the attack is happening (not just same round 6 seconds, but as the effect is landing). It would be hard to argue that they aren't happening at the same time as they are both reactions to the same split second action.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 9 hours ago

























          answered 10 hours ago









          J. A. StreichJ. A. Streich

          28.8k2 gold badges83 silver badges142 bronze badges




          28.8k2 gold badges83 silver badges142 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
            $endgroup$
            – Allan Mills
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
            $endgroup$
            – Medix2
            7 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
            $endgroup$
            – Allan Mills
            7 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
            $endgroup$
            – Medix2
            7 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
          $endgroup$
          – Allan Mills
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Think about this, what if you had two characters with the Warcaster feat. An enemy is adjacent to them and moves in a way that provokes an AoO from both of them at the same time. Both of them respond by casting the same damage spell (eg. inflict wounds) at it and both hit. Since both spells are hitting at the same time then, by your logic, only one of the spells does damage.
          $endgroup$
          – Allan Mills
          7 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
          $endgroup$
          – Medix2
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @allanmills I at least would use the Xanathar's simultaneous events optional rule. So they aren't actually hitting at the same time
          $endgroup$
          – Medix2
          7 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f154105%2fif-two-lore-bards-used-the-cutting-words-feature-on-an-ability-check-or-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

          Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

          Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)