How many numbers in the matrix?Smith Normal Form and lower triangular Toeplitz Matricescriterion for deciding whether the product of a sequence of Givens rotations can reach the full special orthogonal groupHow to write this result (successive Schur complements compose nicely)Partitioned inverse 3x3 block matrixWhat is the criterion for a matrix containing vectors and their permutations being invertible?A linear combination problemHow to find the set of vectors which are as nearly orthogonal as possible?Is this totally unimodular family?How to find eigenvalues of following block matrices?A conjecture about the submatrix of orthogonal matrix

How many numbers in the matrix?


Smith Normal Form and lower triangular Toeplitz Matricescriterion for deciding whether the product of a sequence of Givens rotations can reach the full special orthogonal groupHow to write this result (successive Schur complements compose nicely)Partitioned inverse 3x3 block matrixWhat is the criterion for a matrix containing vectors and their permutations being invertible?A linear combination problemHow to find the set of vectors which are as nearly orthogonal as possible?Is this totally unimodular family?How to find eigenvalues of following block matrices?A conjecture about the submatrix of orthogonal matrix













1












$begingroup$


We consider a matrix $beginbmatrixa_i,jendbmatrix$ with $r$ rows and $c$ columns. We fill this matrix only with zeros and ones.



How many ones (maximally!) we can write into the matrix $rtimes c$ to not have any rectangle with ones at its vertices? Formally:
$$
forall_i_1,i_2in1,ldots,r forall_j_1,j_2in1,ldots,c big( (i_1neq i_2 wedge j_1neq j_2) Rightarrow 0ina_i_1,j_1,a_i_1,j_2, a_i_2,j_1, a_i_2,j_2 big).
$$



For example, for $3times 3$ matrix we can fill it with 6 ones:
$$
beginbmatrix
1 & 1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 1 & 1
endbmatrix.
$$

But when we use 7 ones, then there always is a rectangle with ones at its vertices. For example:
$$beginbmatrix
mathbf 1 & mathbf 1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 \
mathbf 1 & mathbf 1 & 1
endbmatrix.
$$

But what is the maximal number of ones for matrix $rtimes c$?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor



bonawentura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    A simple (and not entirely straightforward) argument gives 2(r+c) as a weak upper bound. I suspect the answer is closer to 2max(r,c). (Actually, a tweak gives the latter, which may still be weak.) Gerhard "And What Have You Tried" Paseman, 2019.08.09.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerhard Paseman
    7 hours ago
















1












$begingroup$


We consider a matrix $beginbmatrixa_i,jendbmatrix$ with $r$ rows and $c$ columns. We fill this matrix only with zeros and ones.



How many ones (maximally!) we can write into the matrix $rtimes c$ to not have any rectangle with ones at its vertices? Formally:
$$
forall_i_1,i_2in1,ldots,r forall_j_1,j_2in1,ldots,c big( (i_1neq i_2 wedge j_1neq j_2) Rightarrow 0ina_i_1,j_1,a_i_1,j_2, a_i_2,j_1, a_i_2,j_2 big).
$$



For example, for $3times 3$ matrix we can fill it with 6 ones:
$$
beginbmatrix
1 & 1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 1 & 1
endbmatrix.
$$

But when we use 7 ones, then there always is a rectangle with ones at its vertices. For example:
$$beginbmatrix
mathbf 1 & mathbf 1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 \
mathbf 1 & mathbf 1 & 1
endbmatrix.
$$

But what is the maximal number of ones for matrix $rtimes c$?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor



bonawentura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    A simple (and not entirely straightforward) argument gives 2(r+c) as a weak upper bound. I suspect the answer is closer to 2max(r,c). (Actually, a tweak gives the latter, which may still be weak.) Gerhard "And What Have You Tried" Paseman, 2019.08.09.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerhard Paseman
    7 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


We consider a matrix $beginbmatrixa_i,jendbmatrix$ with $r$ rows and $c$ columns. We fill this matrix only with zeros and ones.



How many ones (maximally!) we can write into the matrix $rtimes c$ to not have any rectangle with ones at its vertices? Formally:
$$
forall_i_1,i_2in1,ldots,r forall_j_1,j_2in1,ldots,c big( (i_1neq i_2 wedge j_1neq j_2) Rightarrow 0ina_i_1,j_1,a_i_1,j_2, a_i_2,j_1, a_i_2,j_2 big).
$$



For example, for $3times 3$ matrix we can fill it with 6 ones:
$$
beginbmatrix
1 & 1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 1 & 1
endbmatrix.
$$

But when we use 7 ones, then there always is a rectangle with ones at its vertices. For example:
$$beginbmatrix
mathbf 1 & mathbf 1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 \
mathbf 1 & mathbf 1 & 1
endbmatrix.
$$

But what is the maximal number of ones for matrix $rtimes c$?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor



bonawentura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




We consider a matrix $beginbmatrixa_i,jendbmatrix$ with $r$ rows and $c$ columns. We fill this matrix only with zeros and ones.



How many ones (maximally!) we can write into the matrix $rtimes c$ to not have any rectangle with ones at its vertices? Formally:
$$
forall_i_1,i_2in1,ldots,r forall_j_1,j_2in1,ldots,c big( (i_1neq i_2 wedge j_1neq j_2) Rightarrow 0ina_i_1,j_1,a_i_1,j_2, a_i_2,j_1, a_i_2,j_2 big).
$$



For example, for $3times 3$ matrix we can fill it with 6 ones:
$$
beginbmatrix
1 & 1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 \
0 & 1 & 1
endbmatrix.
$$

But when we use 7 ones, then there always is a rectangle with ones at its vertices. For example:
$$beginbmatrix
mathbf 1 & mathbf 1 & 0 \
1 & 0 & 1 \
mathbf 1 & mathbf 1 & 1
endbmatrix.
$$

But what is the maximal number of ones for matrix $rtimes c$?







co.combinatorics matrices






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor



bonawentura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor



bonawentura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor



bonawentura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









bonawenturabonawentura

83 bronze badges




83 bronze badges




New contributor



bonawentura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




bonawentura is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • $begingroup$
    A simple (and not entirely straightforward) argument gives 2(r+c) as a weak upper bound. I suspect the answer is closer to 2max(r,c). (Actually, a tweak gives the latter, which may still be weak.) Gerhard "And What Have You Tried" Paseman, 2019.08.09.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerhard Paseman
    7 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    A simple (and not entirely straightforward) argument gives 2(r+c) as a weak upper bound. I suspect the answer is closer to 2max(r,c). (Actually, a tweak gives the latter, which may still be weak.) Gerhard "And What Have You Tried" Paseman, 2019.08.09.
    $endgroup$
    – Gerhard Paseman
    7 hours ago
















$begingroup$
A simple (and not entirely straightforward) argument gives 2(r+c) as a weak upper bound. I suspect the answer is closer to 2max(r,c). (Actually, a tweak gives the latter, which may still be weak.) Gerhard "And What Have You Tried" Paseman, 2019.08.09.
$endgroup$
– Gerhard Paseman
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
A simple (and not entirely straightforward) argument gives 2(r+c) as a weak upper bound. I suspect the answer is closer to 2max(r,c). (Actually, a tweak gives the latter, which may still be weak.) Gerhard "And What Have You Tried" Paseman, 2019.08.09.
$endgroup$
– Gerhard Paseman
7 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

It seems you just want to maximise the number of ones so that there is no
$$left[matrix1&1\1&1right]$$
as a not-necessarily-contiguous $2times 2$ submatrix.



Equivalently, how many edges can a bipartite graph with sides of size $r$ and $s$ have without having any 4-cycles?



This is the first non-trivial case of the Zarankiewicz problem.



The square case is A001197(n)-1.



There is a table of values and bounds in this paper. I have more exact values near the diagonal.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$














  • $begingroup$
    In particular, see OEIS sequences A191873 and A001197.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Also A072567.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Pratt
    6 hours ago



















1












$begingroup$

For an $n times n$ matrix, you can get $3 (n-1)$ ones by putting them in all entries except $(1,1)$ of the first row, first column and main diagonal. That's optimal at least for $n le 5$.



But for $6 times 6$ the optimal solution has $16$ ones, e.g.



$$ left[ begin arraycccccc 0&1&1&1&0&0\ 0&1&0&0
&1&1\ 1&1&0&0&0&0\ 1&0&1&0&1&0
\ 1&0&0&1&0&1\ 0&0&0&1&1&0
end array right]
$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$

















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "504"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    bonawentura is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f338028%2fhow-many-numbers-in-the-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    It seems you just want to maximise the number of ones so that there is no
    $$left[matrix1&1\1&1right]$$
    as a not-necessarily-contiguous $2times 2$ submatrix.



    Equivalently, how many edges can a bipartite graph with sides of size $r$ and $s$ have without having any 4-cycles?



    This is the first non-trivial case of the Zarankiewicz problem.



    The square case is A001197(n)-1.



    There is a table of values and bounds in this paper. I have more exact values near the diagonal.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      In particular, see OEIS sequences A191873 and A001197.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Israel
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Also A072567.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob Pratt
      6 hours ago
















    5












    $begingroup$

    It seems you just want to maximise the number of ones so that there is no
    $$left[matrix1&1\1&1right]$$
    as a not-necessarily-contiguous $2times 2$ submatrix.



    Equivalently, how many edges can a bipartite graph with sides of size $r$ and $s$ have without having any 4-cycles?



    This is the first non-trivial case of the Zarankiewicz problem.



    The square case is A001197(n)-1.



    There is a table of values and bounds in this paper. I have more exact values near the diagonal.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      In particular, see OEIS sequences A191873 and A001197.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Israel
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Also A072567.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob Pratt
      6 hours ago














    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    It seems you just want to maximise the number of ones so that there is no
    $$left[matrix1&1\1&1right]$$
    as a not-necessarily-contiguous $2times 2$ submatrix.



    Equivalently, how many edges can a bipartite graph with sides of size $r$ and $s$ have without having any 4-cycles?



    This is the first non-trivial case of the Zarankiewicz problem.



    The square case is A001197(n)-1.



    There is a table of values and bounds in this paper. I have more exact values near the diagonal.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    It seems you just want to maximise the number of ones so that there is no
    $$left[matrix1&1\1&1right]$$
    as a not-necessarily-contiguous $2times 2$ submatrix.



    Equivalently, how many edges can a bipartite graph with sides of size $r$ and $s$ have without having any 4-cycles?



    This is the first non-trivial case of the Zarankiewicz problem.



    The square case is A001197(n)-1.



    There is a table of values and bounds in this paper. I have more exact values near the diagonal.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 7 hours ago

























    answered 7 hours ago









    Brendan McKayBrendan McKay

    26.6k1 gold badge54 silver badges109 bronze badges




    26.6k1 gold badge54 silver badges109 bronze badges














    • $begingroup$
      In particular, see OEIS sequences A191873 and A001197.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Israel
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Also A072567.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob Pratt
      6 hours ago

















    • $begingroup$
      In particular, see OEIS sequences A191873 and A001197.
      $endgroup$
      – Robert Israel
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Also A072567.
      $endgroup$
      – Rob Pratt
      6 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    In particular, see OEIS sequences A191873 and A001197.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    7 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    In particular, see OEIS sequences A191873 and A001197.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Israel
    7 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    Also A072567.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Pratt
    6 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    Also A072567.
    $endgroup$
    – Rob Pratt
    6 hours ago












    1












    $begingroup$

    For an $n times n$ matrix, you can get $3 (n-1)$ ones by putting them in all entries except $(1,1)$ of the first row, first column and main diagonal. That's optimal at least for $n le 5$.



    But for $6 times 6$ the optimal solution has $16$ ones, e.g.



    $$ left[ begin arraycccccc 0&1&1&1&0&0\ 0&1&0&0
    &1&1\ 1&1&0&0&0&0\ 1&0&1&0&1&0
    \ 1&0&0&1&0&1\ 0&0&0&1&1&0
    end array right]
    $$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



















      1












      $begingroup$

      For an $n times n$ matrix, you can get $3 (n-1)$ ones by putting them in all entries except $(1,1)$ of the first row, first column and main diagonal. That's optimal at least for $n le 5$.



      But for $6 times 6$ the optimal solution has $16$ ones, e.g.



      $$ left[ begin arraycccccc 0&1&1&1&0&0\ 0&1&0&0
      &1&1\ 1&1&0&0&0&0\ 1&0&1&0&1&0
      \ 1&0&0&1&0&1\ 0&0&0&1&1&0
      end array right]
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        For an $n times n$ matrix, you can get $3 (n-1)$ ones by putting them in all entries except $(1,1)$ of the first row, first column and main diagonal. That's optimal at least for $n le 5$.



        But for $6 times 6$ the optimal solution has $16$ ones, e.g.



        $$ left[ begin arraycccccc 0&1&1&1&0&0\ 0&1&0&0
        &1&1\ 1&1&0&0&0&0\ 1&0&1&0&1&0
        \ 1&0&0&1&0&1\ 0&0&0&1&1&0
        end array right]
        $$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        For an $n times n$ matrix, you can get $3 (n-1)$ ones by putting them in all entries except $(1,1)$ of the first row, first column and main diagonal. That's optimal at least for $n le 5$.



        But for $6 times 6$ the optimal solution has $16$ ones, e.g.



        $$ left[ begin arraycccccc 0&1&1&1&0&0\ 0&1&0&0
        &1&1\ 1&1&0&0&0&0\ 1&0&1&0&1&0
        \ 1&0&0&1&0&1\ 0&0&0&1&1&0
        end array right]
        $$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago

























        answered 7 hours ago









        Robert IsraelRobert Israel

        45.2k54 silver badges125 bronze badges




        45.2k54 silver badges125 bronze badges























            bonawentura is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            bonawentura is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            bonawentura is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            bonawentura is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f338028%2fhow-many-numbers-in-the-matrix%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

            Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

            Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)