Comparing Investment Style with Fama French 3 Factor ModelMulti Factor Credit Risk ModelsMissing factor in the factor modelhow can I calculate the factor loading (beta)?Using cross-sectional factor model (BARRA type) returns in a time series factor model (Fama-French type)?Fama-French three-factor model vs four-factor (Carhart) and five-factor modelFama French & Solving for AlphaHow to build Factor model like Fama & French (2014)?Fama french model: Daily excess return calculationExtend mean-variance optimisation to fama five factor

Is there a tool to measure the "maturity" of a code in Git?

Where is it? - The Google Earth Challenge Ep. 4

What is this WWII four-engine plane on skis?

How would you translate Evangelii Nuntiandi?

Is it acceptable to use decoupling capacitor ground pad as ground for oscilloscope probe?

Why is the UK still pressing on with Brexit?

Is my sink P-trap too low?

What is the difference between an engine skirt and an engine nozzle?

How to install Rasbian Stretch on Raspberry Pi 4?

Why are two-stroke engines nearly unheard of in aviation?

What is the origin of the "being immortal sucks" trope?

Can a business put whatever they want into a contract?

Can Brexit be undone in an emergency?

LeetCode: Top K Frequent Elements C#

Why is it called a stateful and a stateless firewall?

What is the word for a person who destroys monuments?

What are the typical trumpet parts in classical music?

Did slaves have slaves?

How to give my students a straightedge instead of a ruler

Comparing Investment Style with Fama French 3 Factor Model

Other than good shoes and a stick, what are some ways to preserve your knees on long hikes?

Why don't airports use arresting gears to recover energy from landing passenger planes?

Is it better to use mosfet with gate driver IC or mosfet with lower VGs on

How often is duct tape used during crewed space missions?



Comparing Investment Style with Fama French 3 Factor Model


Multi Factor Credit Risk ModelsMissing factor in the factor modelhow can I calculate the factor loading (beta)?Using cross-sectional factor model (BARRA type) returns in a time series factor model (Fama-French type)?Fama-French three-factor model vs four-factor (Carhart) and five-factor modelFama French & Solving for AlphaHow to build Factor model like Fama & French (2014)?Fama french model: Daily excess return calculationExtend mean-variance optimisation to fama five factor






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


enter image description here



How do you evaluate this? I have tried searching online but there are no matching results. Is it just a simple average of the 3 Betas? And how do we determine the investment style aggressiveness? In single factor model, β > 1 is used as proxy but this is a multi-factor model. Any help would be appreciated










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$


    enter image description here



    How do you evaluate this? I have tried searching online but there are no matching results. Is it just a simple average of the 3 Betas? And how do we determine the investment style aggressiveness? In single factor model, β > 1 is used as proxy but this is a multi-factor model. Any help would be appreciated










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$
















      2












      2








      2





      $begingroup$


      enter image description here



      How do you evaluate this? I have tried searching online but there are no matching results. Is it just a simple average of the 3 Betas? And how do we determine the investment style aggressiveness? In single factor model, β > 1 is used as proxy but this is a multi-factor model. Any help would be appreciated










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      enter image description here



      How do you evaluate this? I have tried searching online but there are no matching results. Is it just a simple average of the 3 Betas? And how do we determine the investment style aggressiveness? In single factor model, β > 1 is used as proxy but this is a multi-factor model. Any help would be appreciated







      factor-models fama-french factor-loading






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 14 hours ago









      SMLJKNNSMLJKNN

      566 bronze badges




      566 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          $begingroup$

          How do the investment styles compare?



          KIS 10 is the only one with substantial exposure to Value and Size, the other two have negligible exposure to these two factors. GS1 is typical of a portfolio of big, growing companies, such as S&P 500, market beta near 1 and with very slightly negative value and size exposure. Most investors hold this kind of portfolio, and most mutual funds have this profile. But GS1 is not an S&P 500 Index Fund since such funds target and achieve a market beta of exactly 1. CS7 is slightly more cautious that GS1, probably holds some additional cash.



          Which is most aggressive?



          Since an "average portfolio" has betas of (1,0,0), I would measure "aggressiveness" as $beta_1+|beta_2| +|beta_3|$. So KIS1 is most aggressive.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$






















            1














            $begingroup$

            This question seems rather vague, but I believe what the question can be answered by identifying the portfolio with the largest difference in the portfolio's excess return and the FF3FM expected return after subtracting the risk free rate.



            If, for example, the model prices the portfolio near the portfolio's actual excess return then you know that the portfolio is likely an indexed portfolio. The greater the difference between the model's expected return and the portfolio's actual excess return, the more likely that the portfolio uses some active management that attempts to achieve alpha through security selection--often thought of as a more aggressive style.



            Keep in mind, in my above answer, remember to take out the risk free rate from the FF3FM expected return so that you are not inflating the portfolio's actual return.



            You will have to retrieve the HML and SMB values from the model creator's website.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$

















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "204"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );














              draft saved

              draft discarded
















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48697%2fcomparing-investment-style-with-fama-french-3-factor-model%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              $begingroup$

              How do the investment styles compare?



              KIS 10 is the only one with substantial exposure to Value and Size, the other two have negligible exposure to these two factors. GS1 is typical of a portfolio of big, growing companies, such as S&P 500, market beta near 1 and with very slightly negative value and size exposure. Most investors hold this kind of portfolio, and most mutual funds have this profile. But GS1 is not an S&P 500 Index Fund since such funds target and achieve a market beta of exactly 1. CS7 is slightly more cautious that GS1, probably holds some additional cash.



              Which is most aggressive?



              Since an "average portfolio" has betas of (1,0,0), I would measure "aggressiveness" as $beta_1+|beta_2| +|beta_3|$. So KIS1 is most aggressive.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



















                2














                $begingroup$

                How do the investment styles compare?



                KIS 10 is the only one with substantial exposure to Value and Size, the other two have negligible exposure to these two factors. GS1 is typical of a portfolio of big, growing companies, such as S&P 500, market beta near 1 and with very slightly negative value and size exposure. Most investors hold this kind of portfolio, and most mutual funds have this profile. But GS1 is not an S&P 500 Index Fund since such funds target and achieve a market beta of exactly 1. CS7 is slightly more cautious that GS1, probably holds some additional cash.



                Which is most aggressive?



                Since an "average portfolio" has betas of (1,0,0), I would measure "aggressiveness" as $beta_1+|beta_2| +|beta_3|$. So KIS1 is most aggressive.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  2














                  2










                  2







                  $begingroup$

                  How do the investment styles compare?



                  KIS 10 is the only one with substantial exposure to Value and Size, the other two have negligible exposure to these two factors. GS1 is typical of a portfolio of big, growing companies, such as S&P 500, market beta near 1 and with very slightly negative value and size exposure. Most investors hold this kind of portfolio, and most mutual funds have this profile. But GS1 is not an S&P 500 Index Fund since such funds target and achieve a market beta of exactly 1. CS7 is slightly more cautious that GS1, probably holds some additional cash.



                  Which is most aggressive?



                  Since an "average portfolio" has betas of (1,0,0), I would measure "aggressiveness" as $beta_1+|beta_2| +|beta_3|$. So KIS1 is most aggressive.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  How do the investment styles compare?



                  KIS 10 is the only one with substantial exposure to Value and Size, the other two have negligible exposure to these two factors. GS1 is typical of a portfolio of big, growing companies, such as S&P 500, market beta near 1 and with very slightly negative value and size exposure. Most investors hold this kind of portfolio, and most mutual funds have this profile. But GS1 is not an S&P 500 Index Fund since such funds target and achieve a market beta of exactly 1. CS7 is slightly more cautious that GS1, probably holds some additional cash.



                  Which is most aggressive?



                  Since an "average portfolio" has betas of (1,0,0), I would measure "aggressiveness" as $beta_1+|beta_2| +|beta_3|$. So KIS1 is most aggressive.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 5 hours ago

























                  answered 5 hours ago









                  Alex CAlex C

                  7,2691 gold badge13 silver badges26 bronze badges




                  7,2691 gold badge13 silver badges26 bronze badges


























                      1














                      $begingroup$

                      This question seems rather vague, but I believe what the question can be answered by identifying the portfolio with the largest difference in the portfolio's excess return and the FF3FM expected return after subtracting the risk free rate.



                      If, for example, the model prices the portfolio near the portfolio's actual excess return then you know that the portfolio is likely an indexed portfolio. The greater the difference between the model's expected return and the portfolio's actual excess return, the more likely that the portfolio uses some active management that attempts to achieve alpha through security selection--often thought of as a more aggressive style.



                      Keep in mind, in my above answer, remember to take out the risk free rate from the FF3FM expected return so that you are not inflating the portfolio's actual return.



                      You will have to retrieve the HML and SMB values from the model creator's website.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



















                        1














                        $begingroup$

                        This question seems rather vague, but I believe what the question can be answered by identifying the portfolio with the largest difference in the portfolio's excess return and the FF3FM expected return after subtracting the risk free rate.



                        If, for example, the model prices the portfolio near the portfolio's actual excess return then you know that the portfolio is likely an indexed portfolio. The greater the difference between the model's expected return and the portfolio's actual excess return, the more likely that the portfolio uses some active management that attempts to achieve alpha through security selection--often thought of as a more aggressive style.



                        Keep in mind, in my above answer, remember to take out the risk free rate from the FF3FM expected return so that you are not inflating the portfolio's actual return.



                        You will have to retrieve the HML and SMB values from the model creator's website.






                        share|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          1














                          1










                          1







                          $begingroup$

                          This question seems rather vague, but I believe what the question can be answered by identifying the portfolio with the largest difference in the portfolio's excess return and the FF3FM expected return after subtracting the risk free rate.



                          If, for example, the model prices the portfolio near the portfolio's actual excess return then you know that the portfolio is likely an indexed portfolio. The greater the difference between the model's expected return and the portfolio's actual excess return, the more likely that the portfolio uses some active management that attempts to achieve alpha through security selection--often thought of as a more aggressive style.



                          Keep in mind, in my above answer, remember to take out the risk free rate from the FF3FM expected return so that you are not inflating the portfolio's actual return.



                          You will have to retrieve the HML and SMB values from the model creator's website.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          This question seems rather vague, but I believe what the question can be answered by identifying the portfolio with the largest difference in the portfolio's excess return and the FF3FM expected return after subtracting the risk free rate.



                          If, for example, the model prices the portfolio near the portfolio's actual excess return then you know that the portfolio is likely an indexed portfolio. The greater the difference between the model's expected return and the portfolio's actual excess return, the more likely that the portfolio uses some active management that attempts to achieve alpha through security selection--often thought of as a more aggressive style.



                          Keep in mind, in my above answer, remember to take out the risk free rate from the FF3FM expected return so that you are not inflating the portfolio's actual return.



                          You will have to retrieve the HML and SMB values from the model creator's website.







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 5 hours ago









                          Jason pJason p

                          212 bronze badges




                          212 bronze badges































                              draft saved

                              draft discarded















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48697%2fcomparing-investment-style-with-fama-french-3-factor-model%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                              Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                              19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу