Comparing Investment Style with Fama French 3 Factor ModelMulti Factor Credit Risk ModelsMissing factor in the factor modelhow can I calculate the factor loading (beta)?Using cross-sectional factor model (BARRA type) returns in a time series factor model (Fama-French type)?Fama-French three-factor model vs four-factor (Carhart) and five-factor modelFama French & Solving for AlphaHow to build Factor model like Fama & French (2014)?Fama french model: Daily excess return calculationExtend mean-variance optimisation to fama five factor
Is there a tool to measure the "maturity" of a code in Git?
Where is it? - The Google Earth Challenge Ep. 4
What is this WWII four-engine plane on skis?
How would you translate Evangelii Nuntiandi?
Is it acceptable to use decoupling capacitor ground pad as ground for oscilloscope probe?
Why is the UK still pressing on with Brexit?
Is my sink P-trap too low?
What is the difference between an engine skirt and an engine nozzle?
How to install Rasbian Stretch on Raspberry Pi 4?
Why are two-stroke engines nearly unheard of in aviation?
What is the origin of the "being immortal sucks" trope?
Can a business put whatever they want into a contract?
Can Brexit be undone in an emergency?
LeetCode: Top K Frequent Elements C#
Why is it called a stateful and a stateless firewall?
What is the word for a person who destroys monuments?
What are the typical trumpet parts in classical music?
Did slaves have slaves?
How to give my students a straightedge instead of a ruler
Comparing Investment Style with Fama French 3 Factor Model
Other than good shoes and a stick, what are some ways to preserve your knees on long hikes?
Why don't airports use arresting gears to recover energy from landing passenger planes?
Is it better to use mosfet with gate driver IC or mosfet with lower VGs on
How often is duct tape used during crewed space missions?
Comparing Investment Style with Fama French 3 Factor Model
Multi Factor Credit Risk ModelsMissing factor in the factor modelhow can I calculate the factor loading (beta)?Using cross-sectional factor model (BARRA type) returns in a time series factor model (Fama-French type)?Fama-French three-factor model vs four-factor (Carhart) and five-factor modelFama French & Solving for AlphaHow to build Factor model like Fama & French (2014)?Fama french model: Daily excess return calculationExtend mean-variance optimisation to fama five factor
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
How do you evaluate this? I have tried searching online but there are no matching results. Is it just a simple average of the 3 Betas? And how do we determine the investment style aggressiveness? In single factor model, β > 1 is used as proxy but this is a multi-factor model. Any help would be appreciated
factor-models fama-french factor-loading
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
How do you evaluate this? I have tried searching online but there are no matching results. Is it just a simple average of the 3 Betas? And how do we determine the investment style aggressiveness? In single factor model, β > 1 is used as proxy but this is a multi-factor model. Any help would be appreciated
factor-models fama-french factor-loading
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
How do you evaluate this? I have tried searching online but there are no matching results. Is it just a simple average of the 3 Betas? And how do we determine the investment style aggressiveness? In single factor model, β > 1 is used as proxy but this is a multi-factor model. Any help would be appreciated
factor-models fama-french factor-loading
$endgroup$
How do you evaluate this? I have tried searching online but there are no matching results. Is it just a simple average of the 3 Betas? And how do we determine the investment style aggressiveness? In single factor model, β > 1 is used as proxy but this is a multi-factor model. Any help would be appreciated
factor-models fama-french factor-loading
factor-models fama-french factor-loading
asked 14 hours ago
SMLJKNNSMLJKNN
566 bronze badges
566 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
How do the investment styles compare?
KIS 10 is the only one with substantial exposure to Value and Size, the other two have negligible exposure to these two factors. GS1 is typical of a portfolio of big, growing companies, such as S&P 500, market beta near 1 and with very slightly negative value and size exposure. Most investors hold this kind of portfolio, and most mutual funds have this profile. But GS1 is not an S&P 500 Index Fund since such funds target and achieve a market beta of exactly 1. CS7 is slightly more cautious that GS1, probably holds some additional cash.
Which is most aggressive?
Since an "average portfolio" has betas of (1,0,0), I would measure "aggressiveness" as $beta_1+|beta_2| +|beta_3|$. So KIS1 is most aggressive.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This question seems rather vague, but I believe what the question can be answered by identifying the portfolio with the largest difference in the portfolio's excess return and the FF3FM expected return after subtracting the risk free rate.
If, for example, the model prices the portfolio near the portfolio's actual excess return then you know that the portfolio is likely an indexed portfolio. The greater the difference between the model's expected return and the portfolio's actual excess return, the more likely that the portfolio uses some active management that attempts to achieve alpha through security selection--often thought of as a more aggressive style.
Keep in mind, in my above answer, remember to take out the risk free rate from the FF3FM expected return so that you are not inflating the portfolio's actual return.
You will have to retrieve the HML and SMB values from the model creator's website.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "204"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48697%2fcomparing-investment-style-with-fama-french-3-factor-model%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
How do the investment styles compare?
KIS 10 is the only one with substantial exposure to Value and Size, the other two have negligible exposure to these two factors. GS1 is typical of a portfolio of big, growing companies, such as S&P 500, market beta near 1 and with very slightly negative value and size exposure. Most investors hold this kind of portfolio, and most mutual funds have this profile. But GS1 is not an S&P 500 Index Fund since such funds target and achieve a market beta of exactly 1. CS7 is slightly more cautious that GS1, probably holds some additional cash.
Which is most aggressive?
Since an "average portfolio" has betas of (1,0,0), I would measure "aggressiveness" as $beta_1+|beta_2| +|beta_3|$. So KIS1 is most aggressive.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
How do the investment styles compare?
KIS 10 is the only one with substantial exposure to Value and Size, the other two have negligible exposure to these two factors. GS1 is typical of a portfolio of big, growing companies, such as S&P 500, market beta near 1 and with very slightly negative value and size exposure. Most investors hold this kind of portfolio, and most mutual funds have this profile. But GS1 is not an S&P 500 Index Fund since such funds target and achieve a market beta of exactly 1. CS7 is slightly more cautious that GS1, probably holds some additional cash.
Which is most aggressive?
Since an "average portfolio" has betas of (1,0,0), I would measure "aggressiveness" as $beta_1+|beta_2| +|beta_3|$. So KIS1 is most aggressive.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
How do the investment styles compare?
KIS 10 is the only one with substantial exposure to Value and Size, the other two have negligible exposure to these two factors. GS1 is typical of a portfolio of big, growing companies, such as S&P 500, market beta near 1 and with very slightly negative value and size exposure. Most investors hold this kind of portfolio, and most mutual funds have this profile. But GS1 is not an S&P 500 Index Fund since such funds target and achieve a market beta of exactly 1. CS7 is slightly more cautious that GS1, probably holds some additional cash.
Which is most aggressive?
Since an "average portfolio" has betas of (1,0,0), I would measure "aggressiveness" as $beta_1+|beta_2| +|beta_3|$. So KIS1 is most aggressive.
$endgroup$
How do the investment styles compare?
KIS 10 is the only one with substantial exposure to Value and Size, the other two have negligible exposure to these two factors. GS1 is typical of a portfolio of big, growing companies, such as S&P 500, market beta near 1 and with very slightly negative value and size exposure. Most investors hold this kind of portfolio, and most mutual funds have this profile. But GS1 is not an S&P 500 Index Fund since such funds target and achieve a market beta of exactly 1. CS7 is slightly more cautious that GS1, probably holds some additional cash.
Which is most aggressive?
Since an "average portfolio" has betas of (1,0,0), I would measure "aggressiveness" as $beta_1+|beta_2| +|beta_3|$. So KIS1 is most aggressive.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 5 hours ago
Alex CAlex C
7,2691 gold badge13 silver badges26 bronze badges
7,2691 gold badge13 silver badges26 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This question seems rather vague, but I believe what the question can be answered by identifying the portfolio with the largest difference in the portfolio's excess return and the FF3FM expected return after subtracting the risk free rate.
If, for example, the model prices the portfolio near the portfolio's actual excess return then you know that the portfolio is likely an indexed portfolio. The greater the difference between the model's expected return and the portfolio's actual excess return, the more likely that the portfolio uses some active management that attempts to achieve alpha through security selection--often thought of as a more aggressive style.
Keep in mind, in my above answer, remember to take out the risk free rate from the FF3FM expected return so that you are not inflating the portfolio's actual return.
You will have to retrieve the HML and SMB values from the model creator's website.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This question seems rather vague, but I believe what the question can be answered by identifying the portfolio with the largest difference in the portfolio's excess return and the FF3FM expected return after subtracting the risk free rate.
If, for example, the model prices the portfolio near the portfolio's actual excess return then you know that the portfolio is likely an indexed portfolio. The greater the difference between the model's expected return and the portfolio's actual excess return, the more likely that the portfolio uses some active management that attempts to achieve alpha through security selection--often thought of as a more aggressive style.
Keep in mind, in my above answer, remember to take out the risk free rate from the FF3FM expected return so that you are not inflating the portfolio's actual return.
You will have to retrieve the HML and SMB values from the model creator's website.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
This question seems rather vague, but I believe what the question can be answered by identifying the portfolio with the largest difference in the portfolio's excess return and the FF3FM expected return after subtracting the risk free rate.
If, for example, the model prices the portfolio near the portfolio's actual excess return then you know that the portfolio is likely an indexed portfolio. The greater the difference between the model's expected return and the portfolio's actual excess return, the more likely that the portfolio uses some active management that attempts to achieve alpha through security selection--often thought of as a more aggressive style.
Keep in mind, in my above answer, remember to take out the risk free rate from the FF3FM expected return so that you are not inflating the portfolio's actual return.
You will have to retrieve the HML and SMB values from the model creator's website.
$endgroup$
This question seems rather vague, but I believe what the question can be answered by identifying the portfolio with the largest difference in the portfolio's excess return and the FF3FM expected return after subtracting the risk free rate.
If, for example, the model prices the portfolio near the portfolio's actual excess return then you know that the portfolio is likely an indexed portfolio. The greater the difference between the model's expected return and the portfolio's actual excess return, the more likely that the portfolio uses some active management that attempts to achieve alpha through security selection--often thought of as a more aggressive style.
Keep in mind, in my above answer, remember to take out the risk free rate from the FF3FM expected return so that you are not inflating the portfolio's actual return.
You will have to retrieve the HML and SMB values from the model creator's website.
answered 5 hours ago
Jason pJason p
212 bronze badges
212 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantitative Finance Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquant.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f48697%2fcomparing-investment-style-with-fama-french-3-factor-model%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown