What is the delta-v required to get a mass in Earth orbit into the sun using a SINGLE transfer?How much less delta-v would it take to reach the Sun using Venus and Earth flyby's compared to direct?Can you tack against the sun using a solar sail?How to calculate delta-v required for a planet-to-planet Hohmann transfer?What is the flight plan to get Gaia in orbit around the Sun–Earth $L_2$ Lagrangian point?Calculate Delta-V for a Hohmann transfer to a higher orbitHow can the delta-V to a specific altitude in Earth orbit be calculated?How much delta v does it take to get to the Sun-Earth Lagrange 3 point?Calculating dV to raise apoapsis at an arbitrary point of an orbitThe delta V required for given cordinates intersection on given timeHow to find the transfer orbit from a initial circular orbit to a final elliptical orbit

Dynamic Picklist Value Retrieval

How to make a pipe-divided tuple?

If every star in the universe except the Sun were destroyed, would we die?

What can we do about our 9-month-old putting fingers down his throat?

pipe command output to convert?

How to interpret or parse this confusing 'NOT' and 'AND' legal clause

After a few interviews, What should I do after told to wait?

Filling attribute tables with values from the same attribute table

Why did Boris Johnson call for new elections?

Are fast interviews red flags?

More than three domains hosted on the same IP address

How should Thaumaturgy's "three times as loud as normal" be interpreted?

Project Euler problem #112

GFCI No Equipment Ground not testing

Statistical closeness implies computational indistinguishability

I won a car in a poker game. How is that taxed in Canada?

Why did Tony's Arc Reactor do this?

Supervisor wants me to support a diploma-thesis SW tool after I graduated

Bit floating sequence

Why has Marx's "Das Kapital" been translated to "Capital" in English and not "The Capital"

How can electricity be positive when electrons are negative?

How do English-speaking kids loudly request something?

How do I write a vertically-stacked definition of a sequence?

Is Sanskrit really the mother of all languages?



What is the delta-v required to get a mass in Earth orbit into the sun using a SINGLE transfer?


How much less delta-v would it take to reach the Sun using Venus and Earth flyby's compared to direct?Can you tack against the sun using a solar sail?How to calculate delta-v required for a planet-to-planet Hohmann transfer?What is the flight plan to get Gaia in orbit around the Sun–Earth $L_2$ Lagrangian point?Calculate Delta-V for a Hohmann transfer to a higher orbitHow can the delta-V to a specific altitude in Earth orbit be calculated?How much delta v does it take to get to the Sun-Earth Lagrange 3 point?Calculating dV to raise apoapsis at an arbitrary point of an orbitThe delta V required for given cordinates intersection on given timeHow to find the transfer orbit from a initial circular orbit to a final elliptical orbit






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I've seen this several related questions to this, but they tend to focus on complex maneuvers to minimize the delta-V. If I wanted to mass-drive, railgun or tether-spin a mass so that it would eventually crash-dive into the sun, what is that value?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$


    I've seen this several related questions to this, but they tend to focus on complex maneuvers to minimize the delta-V. If I wanted to mass-drive, railgun or tether-spin a mass so that it would eventually crash-dive into the sun, what is that value?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$
















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I've seen this several related questions to this, but they tend to focus on complex maneuvers to minimize the delta-V. If I wanted to mass-drive, railgun or tether-spin a mass so that it would eventually crash-dive into the sun, what is that value?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I've seen this several related questions to this, but they tend to focus on complex maneuvers to minimize the delta-V. If I wanted to mass-drive, railgun or tether-spin a mass so that it would eventually crash-dive into the sun, what is that value?







      orbital-maneuver






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 8 hours ago







      Chris B. Behrens

















      asked 8 hours ago









      Chris B. BehrensChris B. Behrens

      9185 silver badges19 bronze badges




      9185 silver badges19 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          $begingroup$

          It costs approximately 30km/s to transfer from LEO to the Sun according to this delta-v map.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$






















            7














            $begingroup$

            Actually the answer is a bit more complex than "Earth orbits at 30 m/s, so you have to stop that velocity and drop in. Thus the delta-V is 30 km/s." The question states that you start from Earth orbit, and that makes a big difference.



            Let's assume an almost ideal situation: the object to be sent to the sun is in a 200-km (Low!!) LEO, whose orbit plane is parallel to the ecliptic plane, so there's no out-of-plane component to the required delta-V. At that altitude, the object orbits Earth at about 7.78 km/s.



            Also, the question says you need only to get to the sun, you don't have to dive straight-line into it. That will save some more delta-V.



            It makes a little difference if you start from Earth at its perihelion, at its aphelion, or somewhere in between. I'll treat the two extreme cases.



            If Earth is at perihelion, its heliocentric velocity is ~30.29 km/s. At that distance from the sun, a very eccentric orbit with perihelion at the sun's photosphere (guaranteed complete entry!) would have an aphelion velocity of ~2.91 km/s. If the object were in free space (not orbiting Earth, but moving around the sun at Earth's orbital velocity), the delta-V would be the difference of those two, 28.38 km/s. And that's a useful number: it tells you that when you've escaped Earth's gravity, you have to be receding from Earth at 28.38 km/s with respect to Earth's barycenter, in the direction opposite to Earth's velocity vector. That relative speed after escaping the gravity field is called the "V-infinity", i.e. the velocity the object would have at essentially infinite distance from the primary.



            But the object is not in free space, it's in LEO. Assuming an impulsive delta-V (instantaneous, so no losses due to increasing altitude as a finite-duration burn progresses)(but boy oh boy, what a kick that would be!), the delta-V needed at 200 km altitude to yield a V-infinity of 28.38 km/s is ~21.72 km/s. Immediately after the delta-V the object would be going 29.50 km/s relative to Earth's surface, parallel to the surface. As it ascends through the gravity field it would decelerate, winding up moving essentially radially away from Earth at 28.38 km/s. If the delta-V is timed properly, that V-infinity is directed "backward", so the object's heliocentric velocity would be 2.91 km/s, and it falls into the sun's photosphere.



            So in that scenario, the required delta-V is ~21.72 km/s.



            But if Earth is at aphelion, its orbit velocity is down to ~29.29 km/s. From there the eccentric orbit that grazes the sun's photosphere has an aphelion velocity of ~2.82 km/s, so the Earth-centered V-infinity needed is the difference of those two, ~26.47 km/s. The delta-V required to get that v-infinity from the 200 km orbit is ~20.89 km/s.



            Initiating "the plunge" from Earth's aphelion saves ~0.83 km/s of delta-V over initiating from perihelion.



            If, for some reason, you want to do the straight-line plunge into the sun, the delta-V goes up. Now you need a V-infinity equal to Earth's orbit velocity. From the 200 km orbit at Earth's perihelion that delta-V is ~24.44 km/s, and from aphelion it is ~23.51 km/s.



            Note that all these are quite different from the 30 km/s result if you do the simple free-space stop'n'drop.



            No references, I did all these calculations myself using introductory orbital mechanics formulae. I assumed only Earth's GM, I didn't include the moon. The result would vary somewhat with the position of the moon when you do this mad dash.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              Very nice answer! So I've just asked How much less delta-v would it take to reach the Sun using Venus and Earth flyby's compared to direct?
              $endgroup$
              – uhoh
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @uhoh Thanks again, @uhoh! Actually, it's faster to do a few Venus and Earth gravity assists to get out to Jupiter with a high V-infinity of approach, then use a Jupiter flyby for the stop'n'drop.
              $endgroup$
              – Tom Spilker
              1 hour ago










            • $begingroup$
              I'd love to see anything in LEO that can impart 20.89km/s of delta V to anything.
              $endgroup$
              – Joshua
              7 mins ago














            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "508"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );














            draft saved

            draft discarded
















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38604%2fwhat-is-the-delta-v-required-to-get-a-mass-in-earth-orbit-into-the-sun-using-a-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4














            $begingroup$

            It costs approximately 30km/s to transfer from LEO to the Sun according to this delta-v map.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



















              4














              $begingroup$

              It costs approximately 30km/s to transfer from LEO to the Sun according to this delta-v map.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                4














                4










                4







                $begingroup$

                It costs approximately 30km/s to transfer from LEO to the Sun according to this delta-v map.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                It costs approximately 30km/s to transfer from LEO to the Sun according to this delta-v map.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered 8 hours ago









                Avi CherryAvi Cherry

                2021 silver badge7 bronze badges




                2021 silver badge7 bronze badges


























                    7














                    $begingroup$

                    Actually the answer is a bit more complex than "Earth orbits at 30 m/s, so you have to stop that velocity and drop in. Thus the delta-V is 30 km/s." The question states that you start from Earth orbit, and that makes a big difference.



                    Let's assume an almost ideal situation: the object to be sent to the sun is in a 200-km (Low!!) LEO, whose orbit plane is parallel to the ecliptic plane, so there's no out-of-plane component to the required delta-V. At that altitude, the object orbits Earth at about 7.78 km/s.



                    Also, the question says you need only to get to the sun, you don't have to dive straight-line into it. That will save some more delta-V.



                    It makes a little difference if you start from Earth at its perihelion, at its aphelion, or somewhere in between. I'll treat the two extreme cases.



                    If Earth is at perihelion, its heliocentric velocity is ~30.29 km/s. At that distance from the sun, a very eccentric orbit with perihelion at the sun's photosphere (guaranteed complete entry!) would have an aphelion velocity of ~2.91 km/s. If the object were in free space (not orbiting Earth, but moving around the sun at Earth's orbital velocity), the delta-V would be the difference of those two, 28.38 km/s. And that's a useful number: it tells you that when you've escaped Earth's gravity, you have to be receding from Earth at 28.38 km/s with respect to Earth's barycenter, in the direction opposite to Earth's velocity vector. That relative speed after escaping the gravity field is called the "V-infinity", i.e. the velocity the object would have at essentially infinite distance from the primary.



                    But the object is not in free space, it's in LEO. Assuming an impulsive delta-V (instantaneous, so no losses due to increasing altitude as a finite-duration burn progresses)(but boy oh boy, what a kick that would be!), the delta-V needed at 200 km altitude to yield a V-infinity of 28.38 km/s is ~21.72 km/s. Immediately after the delta-V the object would be going 29.50 km/s relative to Earth's surface, parallel to the surface. As it ascends through the gravity field it would decelerate, winding up moving essentially radially away from Earth at 28.38 km/s. If the delta-V is timed properly, that V-infinity is directed "backward", so the object's heliocentric velocity would be 2.91 km/s, and it falls into the sun's photosphere.



                    So in that scenario, the required delta-V is ~21.72 km/s.



                    But if Earth is at aphelion, its orbit velocity is down to ~29.29 km/s. From there the eccentric orbit that grazes the sun's photosphere has an aphelion velocity of ~2.82 km/s, so the Earth-centered V-infinity needed is the difference of those two, ~26.47 km/s. The delta-V required to get that v-infinity from the 200 km orbit is ~20.89 km/s.



                    Initiating "the plunge" from Earth's aphelion saves ~0.83 km/s of delta-V over initiating from perihelion.



                    If, for some reason, you want to do the straight-line plunge into the sun, the delta-V goes up. Now you need a V-infinity equal to Earth's orbit velocity. From the 200 km orbit at Earth's perihelion that delta-V is ~24.44 km/s, and from aphelion it is ~23.51 km/s.



                    Note that all these are quite different from the 30 km/s result if you do the simple free-space stop'n'drop.



                    No references, I did all these calculations myself using introductory orbital mechanics formulae. I assumed only Earth's GM, I didn't include the moon. The result would vary somewhat with the position of the moon when you do this mad dash.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$














                    • $begingroup$
                      Very nice answer! So I've just asked How much less delta-v would it take to reach the Sun using Venus and Earth flyby's compared to direct?
                      $endgroup$
                      – uhoh
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @uhoh Thanks again, @uhoh! Actually, it's faster to do a few Venus and Earth gravity assists to get out to Jupiter with a high V-infinity of approach, then use a Jupiter flyby for the stop'n'drop.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tom Spilker
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'd love to see anything in LEO that can impart 20.89km/s of delta V to anything.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Joshua
                      7 mins ago
















                    7














                    $begingroup$

                    Actually the answer is a bit more complex than "Earth orbits at 30 m/s, so you have to stop that velocity and drop in. Thus the delta-V is 30 km/s." The question states that you start from Earth orbit, and that makes a big difference.



                    Let's assume an almost ideal situation: the object to be sent to the sun is in a 200-km (Low!!) LEO, whose orbit plane is parallel to the ecliptic plane, so there's no out-of-plane component to the required delta-V. At that altitude, the object orbits Earth at about 7.78 km/s.



                    Also, the question says you need only to get to the sun, you don't have to dive straight-line into it. That will save some more delta-V.



                    It makes a little difference if you start from Earth at its perihelion, at its aphelion, or somewhere in between. I'll treat the two extreme cases.



                    If Earth is at perihelion, its heliocentric velocity is ~30.29 km/s. At that distance from the sun, a very eccentric orbit with perihelion at the sun's photosphere (guaranteed complete entry!) would have an aphelion velocity of ~2.91 km/s. If the object were in free space (not orbiting Earth, but moving around the sun at Earth's orbital velocity), the delta-V would be the difference of those two, 28.38 km/s. And that's a useful number: it tells you that when you've escaped Earth's gravity, you have to be receding from Earth at 28.38 km/s with respect to Earth's barycenter, in the direction opposite to Earth's velocity vector. That relative speed after escaping the gravity field is called the "V-infinity", i.e. the velocity the object would have at essentially infinite distance from the primary.



                    But the object is not in free space, it's in LEO. Assuming an impulsive delta-V (instantaneous, so no losses due to increasing altitude as a finite-duration burn progresses)(but boy oh boy, what a kick that would be!), the delta-V needed at 200 km altitude to yield a V-infinity of 28.38 km/s is ~21.72 km/s. Immediately after the delta-V the object would be going 29.50 km/s relative to Earth's surface, parallel to the surface. As it ascends through the gravity field it would decelerate, winding up moving essentially radially away from Earth at 28.38 km/s. If the delta-V is timed properly, that V-infinity is directed "backward", so the object's heliocentric velocity would be 2.91 km/s, and it falls into the sun's photosphere.



                    So in that scenario, the required delta-V is ~21.72 km/s.



                    But if Earth is at aphelion, its orbit velocity is down to ~29.29 km/s. From there the eccentric orbit that grazes the sun's photosphere has an aphelion velocity of ~2.82 km/s, so the Earth-centered V-infinity needed is the difference of those two, ~26.47 km/s. The delta-V required to get that v-infinity from the 200 km orbit is ~20.89 km/s.



                    Initiating "the plunge" from Earth's aphelion saves ~0.83 km/s of delta-V over initiating from perihelion.



                    If, for some reason, you want to do the straight-line plunge into the sun, the delta-V goes up. Now you need a V-infinity equal to Earth's orbit velocity. From the 200 km orbit at Earth's perihelion that delta-V is ~24.44 km/s, and from aphelion it is ~23.51 km/s.



                    Note that all these are quite different from the 30 km/s result if you do the simple free-space stop'n'drop.



                    No references, I did all these calculations myself using introductory orbital mechanics formulae. I assumed only Earth's GM, I didn't include the moon. The result would vary somewhat with the position of the moon when you do this mad dash.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$














                    • $begingroup$
                      Very nice answer! So I've just asked How much less delta-v would it take to reach the Sun using Venus and Earth flyby's compared to direct?
                      $endgroup$
                      – uhoh
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @uhoh Thanks again, @uhoh! Actually, it's faster to do a few Venus and Earth gravity assists to get out to Jupiter with a high V-infinity of approach, then use a Jupiter flyby for the stop'n'drop.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tom Spilker
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'd love to see anything in LEO that can impart 20.89km/s of delta V to anything.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Joshua
                      7 mins ago














                    7














                    7










                    7







                    $begingroup$

                    Actually the answer is a bit more complex than "Earth orbits at 30 m/s, so you have to stop that velocity and drop in. Thus the delta-V is 30 km/s." The question states that you start from Earth orbit, and that makes a big difference.



                    Let's assume an almost ideal situation: the object to be sent to the sun is in a 200-km (Low!!) LEO, whose orbit plane is parallel to the ecliptic plane, so there's no out-of-plane component to the required delta-V. At that altitude, the object orbits Earth at about 7.78 km/s.



                    Also, the question says you need only to get to the sun, you don't have to dive straight-line into it. That will save some more delta-V.



                    It makes a little difference if you start from Earth at its perihelion, at its aphelion, or somewhere in between. I'll treat the two extreme cases.



                    If Earth is at perihelion, its heliocentric velocity is ~30.29 km/s. At that distance from the sun, a very eccentric orbit with perihelion at the sun's photosphere (guaranteed complete entry!) would have an aphelion velocity of ~2.91 km/s. If the object were in free space (not orbiting Earth, but moving around the sun at Earth's orbital velocity), the delta-V would be the difference of those two, 28.38 km/s. And that's a useful number: it tells you that when you've escaped Earth's gravity, you have to be receding from Earth at 28.38 km/s with respect to Earth's barycenter, in the direction opposite to Earth's velocity vector. That relative speed after escaping the gravity field is called the "V-infinity", i.e. the velocity the object would have at essentially infinite distance from the primary.



                    But the object is not in free space, it's in LEO. Assuming an impulsive delta-V (instantaneous, so no losses due to increasing altitude as a finite-duration burn progresses)(but boy oh boy, what a kick that would be!), the delta-V needed at 200 km altitude to yield a V-infinity of 28.38 km/s is ~21.72 km/s. Immediately after the delta-V the object would be going 29.50 km/s relative to Earth's surface, parallel to the surface. As it ascends through the gravity field it would decelerate, winding up moving essentially radially away from Earth at 28.38 km/s. If the delta-V is timed properly, that V-infinity is directed "backward", so the object's heliocentric velocity would be 2.91 km/s, and it falls into the sun's photosphere.



                    So in that scenario, the required delta-V is ~21.72 km/s.



                    But if Earth is at aphelion, its orbit velocity is down to ~29.29 km/s. From there the eccentric orbit that grazes the sun's photosphere has an aphelion velocity of ~2.82 km/s, so the Earth-centered V-infinity needed is the difference of those two, ~26.47 km/s. The delta-V required to get that v-infinity from the 200 km orbit is ~20.89 km/s.



                    Initiating "the plunge" from Earth's aphelion saves ~0.83 km/s of delta-V over initiating from perihelion.



                    If, for some reason, you want to do the straight-line plunge into the sun, the delta-V goes up. Now you need a V-infinity equal to Earth's orbit velocity. From the 200 km orbit at Earth's perihelion that delta-V is ~24.44 km/s, and from aphelion it is ~23.51 km/s.



                    Note that all these are quite different from the 30 km/s result if you do the simple free-space stop'n'drop.



                    No references, I did all these calculations myself using introductory orbital mechanics formulae. I assumed only Earth's GM, I didn't include the moon. The result would vary somewhat with the position of the moon when you do this mad dash.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Actually the answer is a bit more complex than "Earth orbits at 30 m/s, so you have to stop that velocity and drop in. Thus the delta-V is 30 km/s." The question states that you start from Earth orbit, and that makes a big difference.



                    Let's assume an almost ideal situation: the object to be sent to the sun is in a 200-km (Low!!) LEO, whose orbit plane is parallel to the ecliptic plane, so there's no out-of-plane component to the required delta-V. At that altitude, the object orbits Earth at about 7.78 km/s.



                    Also, the question says you need only to get to the sun, you don't have to dive straight-line into it. That will save some more delta-V.



                    It makes a little difference if you start from Earth at its perihelion, at its aphelion, or somewhere in between. I'll treat the two extreme cases.



                    If Earth is at perihelion, its heliocentric velocity is ~30.29 km/s. At that distance from the sun, a very eccentric orbit with perihelion at the sun's photosphere (guaranteed complete entry!) would have an aphelion velocity of ~2.91 km/s. If the object were in free space (not orbiting Earth, but moving around the sun at Earth's orbital velocity), the delta-V would be the difference of those two, 28.38 km/s. And that's a useful number: it tells you that when you've escaped Earth's gravity, you have to be receding from Earth at 28.38 km/s with respect to Earth's barycenter, in the direction opposite to Earth's velocity vector. That relative speed after escaping the gravity field is called the "V-infinity", i.e. the velocity the object would have at essentially infinite distance from the primary.



                    But the object is not in free space, it's in LEO. Assuming an impulsive delta-V (instantaneous, so no losses due to increasing altitude as a finite-duration burn progresses)(but boy oh boy, what a kick that would be!), the delta-V needed at 200 km altitude to yield a V-infinity of 28.38 km/s is ~21.72 km/s. Immediately after the delta-V the object would be going 29.50 km/s relative to Earth's surface, parallel to the surface. As it ascends through the gravity field it would decelerate, winding up moving essentially radially away from Earth at 28.38 km/s. If the delta-V is timed properly, that V-infinity is directed "backward", so the object's heliocentric velocity would be 2.91 km/s, and it falls into the sun's photosphere.



                    So in that scenario, the required delta-V is ~21.72 km/s.



                    But if Earth is at aphelion, its orbit velocity is down to ~29.29 km/s. From there the eccentric orbit that grazes the sun's photosphere has an aphelion velocity of ~2.82 km/s, so the Earth-centered V-infinity needed is the difference of those two, ~26.47 km/s. The delta-V required to get that v-infinity from the 200 km orbit is ~20.89 km/s.



                    Initiating "the plunge" from Earth's aphelion saves ~0.83 km/s of delta-V over initiating from perihelion.



                    If, for some reason, you want to do the straight-line plunge into the sun, the delta-V goes up. Now you need a V-infinity equal to Earth's orbit velocity. From the 200 km orbit at Earth's perihelion that delta-V is ~24.44 km/s, and from aphelion it is ~23.51 km/s.



                    Note that all these are quite different from the 30 km/s result if you do the simple free-space stop'n'drop.



                    No references, I did all these calculations myself using introductory orbital mechanics formulae. I assumed only Earth's GM, I didn't include the moon. The result would vary somewhat with the position of the moon when you do this mad dash.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 6 hours ago









                    Tom SpilkerTom Spilker

                    13k38 silver badges62 bronze badges




                    13k38 silver badges62 bronze badges














                    • $begingroup$
                      Very nice answer! So I've just asked How much less delta-v would it take to reach the Sun using Venus and Earth flyby's compared to direct?
                      $endgroup$
                      – uhoh
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @uhoh Thanks again, @uhoh! Actually, it's faster to do a few Venus and Earth gravity assists to get out to Jupiter with a high V-infinity of approach, then use a Jupiter flyby for the stop'n'drop.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tom Spilker
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'd love to see anything in LEO that can impart 20.89km/s of delta V to anything.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Joshua
                      7 mins ago

















                    • $begingroup$
                      Very nice answer! So I've just asked How much less delta-v would it take to reach the Sun using Venus and Earth flyby's compared to direct?
                      $endgroup$
                      – uhoh
                      3 hours ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      @uhoh Thanks again, @uhoh! Actually, it's faster to do a few Venus and Earth gravity assists to get out to Jupiter with a high V-infinity of approach, then use a Jupiter flyby for the stop'n'drop.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Tom Spilker
                      1 hour ago










                    • $begingroup$
                      I'd love to see anything in LEO that can impart 20.89km/s of delta V to anything.
                      $endgroup$
                      – Joshua
                      7 mins ago
















                    $begingroup$
                    Very nice answer! So I've just asked How much less delta-v would it take to reach the Sun using Venus and Earth flyby's compared to direct?
                    $endgroup$
                    – uhoh
                    3 hours ago




                    $begingroup$
                    Very nice answer! So I've just asked How much less delta-v would it take to reach the Sun using Venus and Earth flyby's compared to direct?
                    $endgroup$
                    – uhoh
                    3 hours ago












                    $begingroup$
                    @uhoh Thanks again, @uhoh! Actually, it's faster to do a few Venus and Earth gravity assists to get out to Jupiter with a high V-infinity of approach, then use a Jupiter flyby for the stop'n'drop.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Tom Spilker
                    1 hour ago




                    $begingroup$
                    @uhoh Thanks again, @uhoh! Actually, it's faster to do a few Venus and Earth gravity assists to get out to Jupiter with a high V-infinity of approach, then use a Jupiter flyby for the stop'n'drop.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Tom Spilker
                    1 hour ago












                    $begingroup$
                    I'd love to see anything in LEO that can impart 20.89km/s of delta V to anything.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Joshua
                    7 mins ago





                    $begingroup$
                    I'd love to see anything in LEO that can impart 20.89km/s of delta V to anything.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Joshua
                    7 mins ago



















                    draft saved

                    draft discarded















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f38604%2fwhat-is-the-delta-v-required-to-get-a-mass-in-earth-orbit-into-the-sun-using-a-s%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                    Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                    Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)