Function annotation with two or more return parametersWhat does ** (double star/asterisk) and * (star/asterisk) do for parameters?How to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How to flush output of print function?How to return multiple values from a function?Using global variables in a functionLimiting floats to two decimal pointsHow to make a chain of function decorators?How do I concatenate two lists in Python?Why didn't PEP 3107 (or 484) include syntax for annotating global/local variables?function annotations in python
Select list elements based on other list
Employee is self-centered and affects the team negatively
What happens when the drag force exceeds the weight of an object falling into earth?
How do I give a darkroom course without negs from the attendees?
In the figure, a quarter circle, a semicircle and a circle are mutually tangent inside a square of side length 2. Find the radius of the circle.
Scaling rounded rectangles in Illustrator
How to increase speed on my hybrid bike with flat handlebars and 700X35C tyres?
How could a humanoid creature completely form within the span of 24 hours?
What detail can Hubble see on Mars?
How can I test a shell script in a "safe environment" to avoid harm to my computer?
My parents are Afghan
What is more safe for browsing the web: PC or smartphone?
What does the copyright in a dissertation protect exactly?
Does this website provide consistent translation into Wookiee?
My C Drive is full without reason
What is the Ancient One's mistake?
Why were the rules for Proliferate changed?
How to get the decimal part of a number in apex
If an attacker targets a creature with the Sanctuary spell cast on them, but fails the Wisdom save, can they choose not to attack anyone else?
When does WordPress.org notify sites of new version?
Is it safe to keep the GPU on 100% utilization for a very long time?
How do I minimise waste on a flight?
An adjective or a noun to describe a very small apartment / house etc
Translation of "invincible independence"
Function annotation with two or more return parameters
What does ** (double star/asterisk) and * (star/asterisk) do for parameters?How to merge two dictionaries in a single expression?How to flush output of print function?How to return multiple values from a function?Using global variables in a functionLimiting floats to two decimal pointsHow to make a chain of function decorators?How do I concatenate two lists in Python?Why didn't PEP 3107 (or 484) include syntax for annotating global/local variables?function annotations in python
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
When I write an annotation for a function which returns one parameter, I have no problems.
def func() -> str:
return "ok"
However, when I write an annotation with two or more parameters, my PyCharm gives me SyntaxError: invalid syntax.
def func() -> str, str:
return "ok - 1", "ok - 2"
I think that the parameters can be combined with a tuple, but I don't think that's the best way to do it.
My question is: how can I properly annotate a function with two or more return parameters?
Please include a PEP link, if any, in your response. I looked for the answer at PEP 484 and PEP 3107 and could not find it.
python python-3.x type-hinting
edited 29 mins ago
gmds
9,033934
asked 1 hour ago
KirillKirill
1388
add a comment |
When I write an annotation for a function which returns one parameter, I have no problems.
def func() -> str:
return "ok"
However, when I write an annotation with two or more parameters, my PyCharm gives me SyntaxError: invalid syntax.
def func() -> str, str:
return "ok - 1", "ok - 2"
I think that the parameters can be combined with a tuple, but I don't think that's the best way to do it.
My question is: how can I properly annotate a function with two or more return parameters?
Please include a PEP link, if any, in your response. I looked for the answer at PEP 484 and PEP 3107 and could not find it.
python python-3.x type-hinting
edited 29 mins ago
gmds
9,033934
asked 1 hour ago
KirillKirill
1388
add a comment |
When I write an annotation for a function which returns one parameter, I have no problems.
def func() -> str:
return "ok"
However, when I write an annotation with two or more parameters, my PyCharm gives me SyntaxError: invalid syntax.
def func() -> str, str:
return "ok - 1", "ok - 2"
I think that the parameters can be combined with a tuple, but I don't think that's the best way to do it.
My question is: how can I properly annotate a function with two or more return parameters?
Please include a PEP link, if any, in your response. I looked for the answer at PEP 484 and PEP 3107 and could not find it.
python python-3.x type-hinting
edited 29 mins ago
gmds
9,033934
asked 1 hour ago
KirillKirill
1388
When I write an annotation for a function which returns one parameter, I have no problems.
def func() -> str:
return "ok"
However, when I write an annotation with two or more parameters, my PyCharm gives me SyntaxError: invalid syntax.
def func() -> str, str:
return "ok - 1", "ok - 2"
I think that the parameters can be combined with a tuple, but I don't think that's the best way to do it.
My question is: how can I properly annotate a function with two or more return parameters?
Please include a PEP link, if any, in your response. I looked for the answer at PEP 484 and PEP 3107 and could not find it.
python python-3.x type-hinting
python python-3.x type-hinting
edited 29 mins ago
gmds
9,033934
asked 1 hour ago
KirillKirill
1388
edited 29 mins ago
gmds
9,033934
asked 1 hour ago
KirillKirill
1388
edited 29 mins ago
gmds
9,033934
edited 29 mins ago
gmds
9,033934
edited 29 mins ago
gmds
9,033934
9,033934
asked 1 hour ago
KirillKirill
1388
asked 1 hour ago
KirillKirill
1388
asked 1 hour ago
KirillKirill
1388
1388
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Use typing.Tuple:
def func() -> Tuple[str, str]:
return 'a', 'b'
This is appropriate because, conceptually, you are actually returning a single tuple containing those values. Note:
print(type(func()))
Output:
<class 'tuple'>
answered 1 hour ago
gmdsgmds
9,033934
Tupleis reasonable. It may be too strict in some cases, but there isn’t a better alternative without different tradeoffs as far as I can tell.
– kojiro
28 mins ago
@kojiro It seems to me that that would not apply in the case of return values...?
– gmds
26 mins ago
I think it still applies. The main thing about the signature isn’t that the function returns a tuple per se, but that it return an unpackable with a specific length. There are plenty of sequence types that are unpackable, but no generic unpackable type that also has length and inner-type specifiers. Tuple can specify everything, but is too strict.
– kojiro
22 mins ago
@kojiro I might be misunderstanding you, but is it not the case that functions with multiple return values specifically returntuple, as opposed to a function with a single return value that also happens to be an unpackable object that knows its length and elements' types, which would require such a specifier?
– gmds
19 mins ago
A tuple is still a single object that happens to be unpackable. That’s what I’m saying. There isn’t a way to express python returning multiple values from a function because python can’t return multiple values from a function. But it can return a sequence, and a tuple is one kind of sequence.
– kojiro
11 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f56014563%2ffunction-annotation-with-two-or-more-return-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Use typing.Tuple:
def func() -> Tuple[str, str]:
return 'a', 'b'
This is appropriate because, conceptually, you are actually returning a single tuple containing those values. Note:
print(type(func()))
Output:
<class 'tuple'>
answered 1 hour ago
gmdsgmds
9,033934
Tupleis reasonable. It may be too strict in some cases, but there isn’t a better alternative without different tradeoffs as far as I can tell.
– kojiro
28 mins ago
@kojiro It seems to me that that would not apply in the case of return values...?
– gmds
26 mins ago
I think it still applies. The main thing about the signature isn’t that the function returns a tuple per se, but that it return an unpackable with a specific length. There are plenty of sequence types that are unpackable, but no generic unpackable type that also has length and inner-type specifiers. Tuple can specify everything, but is too strict.
– kojiro
22 mins ago
@kojiro I might be misunderstanding you, but is it not the case that functions with multiple return values specifically returntuple, as opposed to a function with a single return value that also happens to be an unpackable object that knows its length and elements' types, which would require such a specifier?
– gmds
19 mins ago
A tuple is still a single object that happens to be unpackable. That’s what I’m saying. There isn’t a way to express python returning multiple values from a function because python can’t return multiple values from a function. But it can return a sequence, and a tuple is one kind of sequence.
– kojiro
11 mins ago
add a comment |
Use typing.Tuple:
def func() -> Tuple[str, str]:
return 'a', 'b'
This is appropriate because, conceptually, you are actually returning a single tuple containing those values. Note:
print(type(func()))
Output:
<class 'tuple'>
answered 1 hour ago
gmdsgmds
9,033934
Tupleis reasonable. It may be too strict in some cases, but there isn’t a better alternative without different tradeoffs as far as I can tell.
– kojiro
28 mins ago
@kojiro It seems to me that that would not apply in the case of return values...?
– gmds
26 mins ago
I think it still applies. The main thing about the signature isn’t that the function returns a tuple per se, but that it return an unpackable with a specific length. There are plenty of sequence types that are unpackable, but no generic unpackable type that also has length and inner-type specifiers. Tuple can specify everything, but is too strict.
– kojiro
22 mins ago
@kojiro I might be misunderstanding you, but is it not the case that functions with multiple return values specifically returntuple, as opposed to a function with a single return value that also happens to be an unpackable object that knows its length and elements' types, which would require such a specifier?
– gmds
19 mins ago
A tuple is still a single object that happens to be unpackable. That’s what I’m saying. There isn’t a way to express python returning multiple values from a function because python can’t return multiple values from a function. But it can return a sequence, and a tuple is one kind of sequence.
– kojiro
11 mins ago
add a comment |
Use typing.Tuple:
def func() -> Tuple[str, str]:
return 'a', 'b'
This is appropriate because, conceptually, you are actually returning a single tuple containing those values. Note:
print(type(func()))
Output:
<class 'tuple'>
answered 1 hour ago
gmdsgmds
9,033934
Use typing.Tuple:
def func() -> Tuple[str, str]:
return 'a', 'b'
This is appropriate because, conceptually, you are actually returning a single tuple containing those values. Note:
print(type(func()))
Output:
<class 'tuple'>
answered 1 hour ago
gmdsgmds
9,033934
edited 1 hour ago
answered 1 hour ago
gmdsgmds
9,033934
answered 1 hour ago
gmdsgmds
9,033934
answered 1 hour ago
gmdsgmds
9,033934
9,033934
Tupleis reasonable. It may be too strict in some cases, but there isn’t a better alternative without different tradeoffs as far as I can tell.
– kojiro
28 mins ago
@kojiro It seems to me that that would not apply in the case of return values...?
– gmds
26 mins ago
I think it still applies. The main thing about the signature isn’t that the function returns a tuple per se, but that it return an unpackable with a specific length. There are plenty of sequence types that are unpackable, but no generic unpackable type that also has length and inner-type specifiers. Tuple can specify everything, but is too strict.
– kojiro
22 mins ago
@kojiro I might be misunderstanding you, but is it not the case that functions with multiple return values specifically returntuple, as opposed to a function with a single return value that also happens to be an unpackable object that knows its length and elements' types, which would require such a specifier?
– gmds
19 mins ago
A tuple is still a single object that happens to be unpackable. That’s what I’m saying. There isn’t a way to express python returning multiple values from a function because python can’t return multiple values from a function. But it can return a sequence, and a tuple is one kind of sequence.
– kojiro
11 mins ago
add a comment |
Tupleis reasonable. It may be too strict in some cases, but there isn’t a better alternative without different tradeoffs as far as I can tell.
– kojiro
28 mins ago
@kojiro It seems to me that that would not apply in the case of return values...?
– gmds
26 mins ago
I think it still applies. The main thing about the signature isn’t that the function returns a tuple per se, but that it return an unpackable with a specific length. There are plenty of sequence types that are unpackable, but no generic unpackable type that also has length and inner-type specifiers. Tuple can specify everything, but is too strict.
– kojiro
22 mins ago
@kojiro I might be misunderstanding you, but is it not the case that functions with multiple return values specifically returntuple, as opposed to a function with a single return value that also happens to be an unpackable object that knows its length and elements' types, which would require such a specifier?
– gmds
19 mins ago
A tuple is still a single object that happens to be unpackable. That’s what I’m saying. There isn’t a way to express python returning multiple values from a function because python can’t return multiple values from a function. But it can return a sequence, and a tuple is one kind of sequence.
– kojiro
11 mins ago
Tuple is reasonable. It may be too strict in some cases, but there isn’t a better alternative without different tradeoffs as far as I can tell.– kojiro
28 mins ago
Tuple is reasonable. It may be too strict in some cases, but there isn’t a better alternative without different tradeoffs as far as I can tell.– kojiro
28 mins ago
@kojiro It seems to me that that would not apply in the case of return values...?
– gmds
26 mins ago
@kojiro It seems to me that that would not apply in the case of return values...?
– gmds
26 mins ago
I think it still applies. The main thing about the signature isn’t that the function returns a tuple per se, but that it return an unpackable with a specific length. There are plenty of sequence types that are unpackable, but no generic unpackable type that also has length and inner-type specifiers. Tuple can specify everything, but is too strict.
– kojiro
22 mins ago
I think it still applies. The main thing about the signature isn’t that the function returns a tuple per se, but that it return an unpackable with a specific length. There are plenty of sequence types that are unpackable, but no generic unpackable type that also has length and inner-type specifiers. Tuple can specify everything, but is too strict.
– kojiro
22 mins ago
@kojiro I might be misunderstanding you, but is it not the case that functions with multiple return values specifically return
tuple, as opposed to a function with a single return value that also happens to be an unpackable object that knows its length and elements' types, which would require such a specifier?– gmds
19 mins ago
@kojiro I might be misunderstanding you, but is it not the case that functions with multiple return values specifically return
tuple, as opposed to a function with a single return value that also happens to be an unpackable object that knows its length and elements' types, which would require such a specifier?– gmds
19 mins ago
A tuple is still a single object that happens to be unpackable. That’s what I’m saying. There isn’t a way to express python returning multiple values from a function because python can’t return multiple values from a function. But it can return a sequence, and a tuple is one kind of sequence.
– kojiro
11 mins ago
A tuple is still a single object that happens to be unpackable. That’s what I’m saying. There isn’t a way to express python returning multiple values from a function because python can’t return multiple values from a function. But it can return a sequence, and a tuple is one kind of sequence.
– kojiro
11 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f56014563%2ffunction-annotation-with-two-or-more-return-parameters%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
