Does this Wild Magic result affect the sorcerer or just other creatures?If a paladin becomes Large, at what point does the paladin's aura originate?Does the Holy Nimbus emanate actual sunlight?Can a Symbol spell affect the same creature more than once?What happens if I can't see a space within 10 feet for the purposes of Blink?Does hurling the flame from Produce Flame cost another action?Does Wild Magic continue if I am unconscious/dead?Would continually decreasing your height with Wild Magic Surges eventually make you vanish from existence?Can Wild Magic Surges restore hit points and spell slots to a Simulacrum of a Wild Magic Sorcerer?Does the Maddening Darkness spell affect creatures in its radius if they have 9th-level magical light illuminating it?Does the spell Wall of Fire shed light?If a sorcerer casts Sickening Radiance with the Careful Spell metamagic option, does he have to spend a sorcery point every round?

Is there a term for the belief that "if it's legal, it's moral"?

Drawing people along with x and y axis

Can there be an UN resolution to remove a country from the UNSC?

How do I professionally let my manager know I'll quit over smoking in the office?

Dates on degrees don’t make sense – will people care?

What's the difference between a deep fryer and a chip pan?

Are all instances of trolls turning to stone ultimately references back to Tolkien?

What's currently blocking the construction of the wall between Mexico and the US?

Explain why a line can never intersect a plane in exactly two points.

Is it illegal to withhold someone's passport and green card in California?

How would modern naval warfare have to have developed differently for battleships to still be relevant in the 21st century?

How long would it take to cross the Channel in 1890's?

How to draw this center trajectory of rolling ball?

Would it be a copyright violation if I made a character’s full name refer to a song?

Why is prior to creation called holy?

What did River say when she woke from her proto-comatose state?

Java TreeMap.floorKey() equivalent for std::map

Greeting with "Ho"

Can you find x?

How many people are necessary to maintain modern civilisation?

How is hair tissue mineral analysis performed?

Do I have to explain the mechanical superiority of the player-character within the fiction of the game?

Why does Linux list NVMe drives as /dev/nvme0 instead of /dev/sda?

Suggested order for Amazon Prime Doctor Who series



Does this Wild Magic result affect the sorcerer or just other creatures?


If a paladin becomes Large, at what point does the paladin's aura originate?Does the Holy Nimbus emanate actual sunlight?Can a Symbol spell affect the same creature more than once?What happens if I can't see a space within 10 feet for the purposes of Blink?Does hurling the flame from Produce Flame cost another action?Does Wild Magic continue if I am unconscious/dead?Would continually decreasing your height with Wild Magic Surges eventually make you vanish from existence?Can Wild Magic Surges restore hit points and spell slots to a Simulacrum of a Wild Magic Sorcerer?Does the Maddening Darkness spell affect creatures in its radius if they have 9th-level magical light illuminating it?Does the spell Wall of Fire shed light?If a sorcerer casts Sickening Radiance with the Careful Spell metamagic option, does he have to spend a sorcery point every round?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








8












$begingroup$


A result of 75 or 76 on the Wild Magic Surge table triggers this effect:




You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute. Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until the end of its next turn.




Does this blindness affect the sorcerer who triggered the surge (since she will always be within 5' of herself?



Or are only other creatures affected by it?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
    $endgroup$
    – findusl
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
    $endgroup$
    – Bagahnoodles
    6 hours ago


















8












$begingroup$


A result of 75 or 76 on the Wild Magic Surge table triggers this effect:




You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute. Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until the end of its next turn.




Does this blindness affect the sorcerer who triggered the surge (since she will always be within 5' of herself?



Or are only other creatures affected by it?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
    $endgroup$
    – findusl
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
    $endgroup$
    – Bagahnoodles
    6 hours ago














8












8








8





$begingroup$


A result of 75 or 76 on the Wild Magic Surge table triggers this effect:




You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute. Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until the end of its next turn.




Does this blindness affect the sorcerer who triggered the surge (since she will always be within 5' of herself?



Or are only other creatures affected by it?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




A result of 75 or 76 on the Wild Magic Surge table triggers this effect:




You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute. Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until the end of its next turn.




Does this blindness affect the sorcerer who triggered the surge (since she will always be within 5' of herself?



Or are only other creatures affected by it?







dnd-5e class-feature sorcerer wild-magic






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









RykaraRykara

8,4572765




8,4572765







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
    $endgroup$
    – findusl
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
    $endgroup$
    – Bagahnoodles
    6 hours ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
    $endgroup$
    – findusl
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
    $endgroup$
    – Bagahnoodles
    6 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
$endgroup$
– findusl
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Interesting thing, this would even blind you if a wall was between you and the other creature because it doesn't have the "that can see you" part.
$endgroup$
– findusl
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
@findusl That may be worth another question. But i'm not sure how the light would extend past a wall. This isn't like a Paladin's magical aura.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
@NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
$endgroup$
– Bagahnoodles
6 hours ago





$begingroup$
@NautArch Well to be fair, it IS wild magic...
$endgroup$
– Bagahnoodles
6 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















11












$begingroup$

Most likely only other creatures



This is similar to Aura effects in that:




You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute




While this doesn't use the word 'aura', the mechanical effect is similar in that you are the effect emanates from you in a specific radius. If we utilize this mechanical similarity, we can look at other Aura effects or spell effects with similar mechanics.



These all have different language in how the aura works that state (pulling from Paladin's Aura of Protection):




whenever you or a friendly creature within 10 feet of you...




Aura of Life also has differing language that states:




Each nonhostile creature in the aura (including you)




Every mechanic that involves something emanating from yourself includes langauge like the above. I have yet to find any mechanic that shows otherwise.



But it's awful wording



Reading it as-is does seem like you count. The only reasoning I've got otherwise I have above, but in a vacuum the blindness would extend to you. However, the support I've given above does strongly suggest that you aren't included by the absence of language that includes yourself.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$

Strictly she is affected, but you may want to decide that she isn't affected.




75-76 You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute.
Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until
the end of its next turn.




She is a creature within 5 feet of herself (0 even, she is the point of origin) and she will be blinded. She isn't exempt from effects unless the description states otherwise. If someone casts fireball on themselves, they will be affected.



For all purposes it is phrased like a Sphere (PHB 204):




You select a sphere’s point of origin, and the sphere extends outward
from that point. The sphere’s size is expressed as a radius in feet
that extends from the point. A sphere’s point of origin is included in
the sphere’s area of effect.




A sphere’s point of origin is included in the sphere’s area of effect this is also true for aura type of effects which have the person as the point of origin, but if you compare it to other rolls on the Wild Magic Surge table (PHB 104):




95-96. You and all creatures within 30 feet of you gain vulnerability
to piercing damage for the next minute.




You will notice that the wording is messy. It makes this awfully explicit that this might not be how the wording is intended. So I would recommend you to rule it as if she is exempt, and also extend that rule so that she is exempt from the 69-70 invisibility effect. Alternatively and strictly RAW, follow what the effects say. For both rolls, the latter would mean that she would be affected - she becomes blind on a 75-76 and invisible on a 69-70.



Compare further how the invisibility effects are worded (and be dismayed at their wording):




69-70 Each creature within 30 feet of you becomes invisible for the
next minute. The invisibility ends on a creature when it attacks or
casts a spell.



89-90 You become invisible for the next minute. During that
time, other creatures can’t hear you. The invisibility ends if you
attack or cast a spell.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150228%2fdoes-this-wild-magic-result-affect-the-sorcerer-or-just-other-creatures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11












    $begingroup$

    Most likely only other creatures



    This is similar to Aura effects in that:




    You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute




    While this doesn't use the word 'aura', the mechanical effect is similar in that you are the effect emanates from you in a specific radius. If we utilize this mechanical similarity, we can look at other Aura effects or spell effects with similar mechanics.



    These all have different language in how the aura works that state (pulling from Paladin's Aura of Protection):




    whenever you or a friendly creature within 10 feet of you...




    Aura of Life also has differing language that states:




    Each nonhostile creature in the aura (including you)




    Every mechanic that involves something emanating from yourself includes langauge like the above. I have yet to find any mechanic that shows otherwise.



    But it's awful wording



    Reading it as-is does seem like you count. The only reasoning I've got otherwise I have above, but in a vacuum the blindness would extend to you. However, the support I've given above does strongly suggest that you aren't included by the absence of language that includes yourself.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago















    11












    $begingroup$

    Most likely only other creatures



    This is similar to Aura effects in that:




    You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute




    While this doesn't use the word 'aura', the mechanical effect is similar in that you are the effect emanates from you in a specific radius. If we utilize this mechanical similarity, we can look at other Aura effects or spell effects with similar mechanics.



    These all have different language in how the aura works that state (pulling from Paladin's Aura of Protection):




    whenever you or a friendly creature within 10 feet of you...




    Aura of Life also has differing language that states:




    Each nonhostile creature in the aura (including you)




    Every mechanic that involves something emanating from yourself includes langauge like the above. I have yet to find any mechanic that shows otherwise.



    But it's awful wording



    Reading it as-is does seem like you count. The only reasoning I've got otherwise I have above, but in a vacuum the blindness would extend to you. However, the support I've given above does strongly suggest that you aren't included by the absence of language that includes yourself.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago













    11












    11








    11





    $begingroup$

    Most likely only other creatures



    This is similar to Aura effects in that:




    You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute




    While this doesn't use the word 'aura', the mechanical effect is similar in that you are the effect emanates from you in a specific radius. If we utilize this mechanical similarity, we can look at other Aura effects or spell effects with similar mechanics.



    These all have different language in how the aura works that state (pulling from Paladin's Aura of Protection):




    whenever you or a friendly creature within 10 feet of you...




    Aura of Life also has differing language that states:




    Each nonhostile creature in the aura (including you)




    Every mechanic that involves something emanating from yourself includes langauge like the above. I have yet to find any mechanic that shows otherwise.



    But it's awful wording



    Reading it as-is does seem like you count. The only reasoning I've got otherwise I have above, but in a vacuum the blindness would extend to you. However, the support I've given above does strongly suggest that you aren't included by the absence of language that includes yourself.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Most likely only other creatures



    This is similar to Aura effects in that:




    You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute




    While this doesn't use the word 'aura', the mechanical effect is similar in that you are the effect emanates from you in a specific radius. If we utilize this mechanical similarity, we can look at other Aura effects or spell effects with similar mechanics.



    These all have different language in how the aura works that state (pulling from Paladin's Aura of Protection):




    whenever you or a friendly creature within 10 feet of you...




    Aura of Life also has differing language that states:




    Each nonhostile creature in the aura (including you)




    Every mechanic that involves something emanating from yourself includes langauge like the above. I have yet to find any mechanic that shows otherwise.



    But it's awful wording



    Reading it as-is does seem like you count. The only reasoning I've got otherwise I have above, but in a vacuum the blindness would extend to you. However, the support I've given above does strongly suggest that you aren't included by the absence of language that includes yourself.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago

























    answered 8 hours ago









    NautArchNautArch

    69.7k11269467




    69.7k11269467











    • $begingroup$
      "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      5 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
      $endgroup$
      – Akixkisu
      5 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    "You emit bright light in a 60-foot radius and dim light 30 feet beyond that. Your enemies in the bright light have disadvantage on saving throws against any spell that deals fire or radiant damage." PHB 61, and here we have it again explicitly using the enemy language. - it is the same old they do what is in their description spiel.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You can basically almost feel that it was inteded to read that way, but it isn't which is fairly annoying.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    @Akixkisu Yup, that one is another that has a specific who. In this case, it's "enemies". It doesn't state that you are included. When you are included, it's always stated so.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    5 hours ago












    $begingroup$
    I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    I'm strongly inclined that it follows sphere logic and that includes the point or person of origin.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    Yup we share a common goal, better to share information than not.
    $endgroup$
    – Akixkisu
    5 hours ago













    2












    $begingroup$

    Strictly she is affected, but you may want to decide that she isn't affected.




    75-76 You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute.
    Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until
    the end of its next turn.




    She is a creature within 5 feet of herself (0 even, she is the point of origin) and she will be blinded. She isn't exempt from effects unless the description states otherwise. If someone casts fireball on themselves, they will be affected.



    For all purposes it is phrased like a Sphere (PHB 204):




    You select a sphere’s point of origin, and the sphere extends outward
    from that point. The sphere’s size is expressed as a radius in feet
    that extends from the point. A sphere’s point of origin is included in
    the sphere’s area of effect.




    A sphere’s point of origin is included in the sphere’s area of effect this is also true for aura type of effects which have the person as the point of origin, but if you compare it to other rolls on the Wild Magic Surge table (PHB 104):




    95-96. You and all creatures within 30 feet of you gain vulnerability
    to piercing damage for the next minute.




    You will notice that the wording is messy. It makes this awfully explicit that this might not be how the wording is intended. So I would recommend you to rule it as if she is exempt, and also extend that rule so that she is exempt from the 69-70 invisibility effect. Alternatively and strictly RAW, follow what the effects say. For both rolls, the latter would mean that she would be affected - she becomes blind on a 75-76 and invisible on a 69-70.



    Compare further how the invisibility effects are worded (and be dismayed at their wording):




    69-70 Each creature within 30 feet of you becomes invisible for the
    next minute. The invisibility ends on a creature when it attacks or
    casts a spell.



    89-90 You become invisible for the next minute. During that
    time, other creatures can’t hear you. The invisibility ends if you
    attack or cast a spell.







    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      Strictly she is affected, but you may want to decide that she isn't affected.




      75-76 You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute.
      Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until
      the end of its next turn.




      She is a creature within 5 feet of herself (0 even, she is the point of origin) and she will be blinded. She isn't exempt from effects unless the description states otherwise. If someone casts fireball on themselves, they will be affected.



      For all purposes it is phrased like a Sphere (PHB 204):




      You select a sphere’s point of origin, and the sphere extends outward
      from that point. The sphere’s size is expressed as a radius in feet
      that extends from the point. A sphere’s point of origin is included in
      the sphere’s area of effect.




      A sphere’s point of origin is included in the sphere’s area of effect this is also true for aura type of effects which have the person as the point of origin, but if you compare it to other rolls on the Wild Magic Surge table (PHB 104):




      95-96. You and all creatures within 30 feet of you gain vulnerability
      to piercing damage for the next minute.




      You will notice that the wording is messy. It makes this awfully explicit that this might not be how the wording is intended. So I would recommend you to rule it as if she is exempt, and also extend that rule so that she is exempt from the 69-70 invisibility effect. Alternatively and strictly RAW, follow what the effects say. For both rolls, the latter would mean that she would be affected - she becomes blind on a 75-76 and invisible on a 69-70.



      Compare further how the invisibility effects are worded (and be dismayed at their wording):




      69-70 Each creature within 30 feet of you becomes invisible for the
      next minute. The invisibility ends on a creature when it attacks or
      casts a spell.



      89-90 You become invisible for the next minute. During that
      time, other creatures can’t hear you. The invisibility ends if you
      attack or cast a spell.







      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        Strictly she is affected, but you may want to decide that she isn't affected.




        75-76 You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute.
        Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until
        the end of its next turn.




        She is a creature within 5 feet of herself (0 even, she is the point of origin) and she will be blinded. She isn't exempt from effects unless the description states otherwise. If someone casts fireball on themselves, they will be affected.



        For all purposes it is phrased like a Sphere (PHB 204):




        You select a sphere’s point of origin, and the sphere extends outward
        from that point. The sphere’s size is expressed as a radius in feet
        that extends from the point. A sphere’s point of origin is included in
        the sphere’s area of effect.




        A sphere’s point of origin is included in the sphere’s area of effect this is also true for aura type of effects which have the person as the point of origin, but if you compare it to other rolls on the Wild Magic Surge table (PHB 104):




        95-96. You and all creatures within 30 feet of you gain vulnerability
        to piercing damage for the next minute.




        You will notice that the wording is messy. It makes this awfully explicit that this might not be how the wording is intended. So I would recommend you to rule it as if she is exempt, and also extend that rule so that she is exempt from the 69-70 invisibility effect. Alternatively and strictly RAW, follow what the effects say. For both rolls, the latter would mean that she would be affected - she becomes blind on a 75-76 and invisible on a 69-70.



        Compare further how the invisibility effects are worded (and be dismayed at their wording):




        69-70 Each creature within 30 feet of you becomes invisible for the
        next minute. The invisibility ends on a creature when it attacks or
        casts a spell.



        89-90 You become invisible for the next minute. During that
        time, other creatures can’t hear you. The invisibility ends if you
        attack or cast a spell.







        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Strictly she is affected, but you may want to decide that she isn't affected.




        75-76 You glow with bright light in a 30-foot radius for the next minute.
        Any creature that ends its turn within 5 feet of you is blinded until
        the end of its next turn.




        She is a creature within 5 feet of herself (0 even, she is the point of origin) and she will be blinded. She isn't exempt from effects unless the description states otherwise. If someone casts fireball on themselves, they will be affected.



        For all purposes it is phrased like a Sphere (PHB 204):




        You select a sphere’s point of origin, and the sphere extends outward
        from that point. The sphere’s size is expressed as a radius in feet
        that extends from the point. A sphere’s point of origin is included in
        the sphere’s area of effect.




        A sphere’s point of origin is included in the sphere’s area of effect this is also true for aura type of effects which have the person as the point of origin, but if you compare it to other rolls on the Wild Magic Surge table (PHB 104):




        95-96. You and all creatures within 30 feet of you gain vulnerability
        to piercing damage for the next minute.




        You will notice that the wording is messy. It makes this awfully explicit that this might not be how the wording is intended. So I would recommend you to rule it as if she is exempt, and also extend that rule so that she is exempt from the 69-70 invisibility effect. Alternatively and strictly RAW, follow what the effects say. For both rolls, the latter would mean that she would be affected - she becomes blind on a 75-76 and invisible on a 69-70.



        Compare further how the invisibility effects are worded (and be dismayed at their wording):




        69-70 Each creature within 30 feet of you becomes invisible for the
        next minute. The invisibility ends on a creature when it attacks or
        casts a spell.



        89-90 You become invisible for the next minute. During that
        time, other creatures can’t hear you. The invisibility ends if you
        attack or cast a spell.








        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 5 hours ago

























        answered 7 hours ago









        AkixkisuAkixkisu

        4,90321852




        4,90321852



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150228%2fdoes-this-wild-magic-result-affect-the-sorcerer-or-just-other-creatures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

            Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

            Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)