USGS Relief map (GeoTIFF raster) misaligns with vector layers (QGIS)Importing a PostGIS and a Delimited Text layer in QGIS, not overlappingHow to project TIGER & WGS84 to Spherical Mercator?Problem with spatial reference system / shapefile projectionUSGS GeoTiff extent via GDALTrouble calculating areas in QGIS using field calculatorAlign vector and raster layers with D3Fixing artifacts in rendered ocean polygonsLoading NAD83 and WGS84 layers together in QGIS?CRS problem after raster reproject via QGIS WarpProjecting NLCD data as WGS84 using QGIS?

Is it possible to have 2 different but equal size real number sets that have the same mean and standard deviation?

Printing Pascal’s triangle for n number of rows in Python

Are polynomials with the same roots identical?

Fermat's statement about the ancients: How serious was he?

Is it expected that a reader will skip parts of what you write?

Return a String containing only alphabets without spaces

Excel division by 0 error when trying to average results of formulas

With Ubuntu 18.04, how can I have a hot corner that locks the computer?

What would be the way to say "just saying" in German? (Not the literal translation)

Should I put programming books I wrote a few years ago on my resume?

Why are MBA programs closing?

Smart-expansion of a range to a list of numbers

First sign that you should look for another job?

Should I refuse being named as co-author of a bad quality paper?

Non-aqueous eyes?

Does putting salt first make it easier for attacker to bruteforce the hash?

How to publish items after pipeline is finished?

What aircraft was used as Air Force One for the flight between Southampton and Shannon?

Separate SPI data

Does the new finding on "reversing a quantum jump mid-flight" rule out any interpretations of QM?

Why Does Mama Coco Look Old After Going to the Other World?

How to communicate to my GM that not being allowed to use stealth isn't fun for me?

Solve Riddle With Algebra

Why can my keyboard only digest 6 keypresses at a time?



USGS Relief map (GeoTIFF raster) misaligns with vector layers (QGIS)


Importing a PostGIS and a Delimited Text layer in QGIS, not overlappingHow to project TIGER & WGS84 to Spherical Mercator?Problem with spatial reference system / shapefile projectionUSGS GeoTiff extent via GDALTrouble calculating areas in QGIS using field calculatorAlign vector and raster layers with D3Fixing artifacts in rendered ocean polygonsLoading NAD83 and WGS84 layers together in QGIS?CRS problem after raster reproject via QGIS WarpProjecting NLCD data as WGS84 using QGIS?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















I'm trying to correct the alignment of three layers (described below), but I'm not entirely sure how to go about re-projecting raster layers to my other layers. Ultimately my goal is to clip the relief map to the park boundaries, to look similar to Grossenbacher's map. There are some park boundaries to remove/exclude, but I first want to make sure everything is aligned.



The main thing that is confusing me is the many different projections of my layers, and which one to choose as the main projection. As well as correctly re-projecting the raster layer.



enter image description hereenter image description here



Layer 1 (brown, TIGER census tracts)



  • CRS: EPSG:4269 - NAD83 - Geographic


  • Source: https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TGRGDB16/


Layer 2 (yellow, National Park boundaries)



  • CRS: EPSG:3857 - WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator - Projected


  • Source: https://public-nps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/national-park-service-park-unit-boundaries


Layer 3 (gray, USGS Relief map [Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution])



  • CRS: Generated CRS (+proj=laea +lat_0=45 +lon_0=-100 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD83 +units=m +no_defs) - Projected


  • Source: https://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/atlasftp.html#srgy48i










share|improve this question
























  • The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

    – csk
    8 hours ago











  • If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

    – csk
    8 hours ago











  • And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

    – James R.
    7 hours ago











  • "The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

    – csk
    7 hours ago

















1















I'm trying to correct the alignment of three layers (described below), but I'm not entirely sure how to go about re-projecting raster layers to my other layers. Ultimately my goal is to clip the relief map to the park boundaries, to look similar to Grossenbacher's map. There are some park boundaries to remove/exclude, but I first want to make sure everything is aligned.



The main thing that is confusing me is the many different projections of my layers, and which one to choose as the main projection. As well as correctly re-projecting the raster layer.



enter image description hereenter image description here



Layer 1 (brown, TIGER census tracts)



  • CRS: EPSG:4269 - NAD83 - Geographic


  • Source: https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TGRGDB16/


Layer 2 (yellow, National Park boundaries)



  • CRS: EPSG:3857 - WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator - Projected


  • Source: https://public-nps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/national-park-service-park-unit-boundaries


Layer 3 (gray, USGS Relief map [Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution])



  • CRS: Generated CRS (+proj=laea +lat_0=45 +lon_0=-100 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD83 +units=m +no_defs) - Projected


  • Source: https://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/atlasftp.html#srgy48i










share|improve this question
























  • The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

    – csk
    8 hours ago











  • If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

    – csk
    8 hours ago











  • And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

    – James R.
    7 hours ago











  • "The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

    – csk
    7 hours ago













1












1








1








I'm trying to correct the alignment of three layers (described below), but I'm not entirely sure how to go about re-projecting raster layers to my other layers. Ultimately my goal is to clip the relief map to the park boundaries, to look similar to Grossenbacher's map. There are some park boundaries to remove/exclude, but I first want to make sure everything is aligned.



The main thing that is confusing me is the many different projections of my layers, and which one to choose as the main projection. As well as correctly re-projecting the raster layer.



enter image description hereenter image description here



Layer 1 (brown, TIGER census tracts)



  • CRS: EPSG:4269 - NAD83 - Geographic


  • Source: https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TGRGDB16/


Layer 2 (yellow, National Park boundaries)



  • CRS: EPSG:3857 - WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator - Projected


  • Source: https://public-nps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/national-park-service-park-unit-boundaries


Layer 3 (gray, USGS Relief map [Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution])



  • CRS: Generated CRS (+proj=laea +lat_0=45 +lon_0=-100 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD83 +units=m +no_defs) - Projected


  • Source: https://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/atlasftp.html#srgy48i










share|improve this question
















I'm trying to correct the alignment of three layers (described below), but I'm not entirely sure how to go about re-projecting raster layers to my other layers. Ultimately my goal is to clip the relief map to the park boundaries, to look similar to Grossenbacher's map. There are some park boundaries to remove/exclude, but I first want to make sure everything is aligned.



The main thing that is confusing me is the many different projections of my layers, and which one to choose as the main projection. As well as correctly re-projecting the raster layer.



enter image description hereenter image description here



Layer 1 (brown, TIGER census tracts)



  • CRS: EPSG:4269 - NAD83 - Geographic


  • Source: https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TGRGDB16/


Layer 2 (yellow, National Park boundaries)



  • CRS: EPSG:3857 - WGS 84 / Pseudo-Mercator - Projected


  • Source: https://public-nps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/national-park-service-park-unit-boundaries


Layer 3 (gray, USGS Relief map [Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution])



  • CRS: Generated CRS (+proj=laea +lat_0=45 +lon_0=-100 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +datum=NAD83 +units=m +no_defs) - Projected


  • Source: https://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/atlasftp.html#srgy48i







qgis raster coordinate-system






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago







James R.

















asked 8 hours ago









James R.James R.

135




135












  • The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

    – csk
    8 hours ago











  • If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

    – csk
    8 hours ago











  • And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

    – James R.
    7 hours ago











  • "The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

    – csk
    7 hours ago

















  • The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

    – csk
    8 hours ago











  • If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

    – csk
    8 hours ago











  • And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

    – csk
    7 hours ago











  • I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

    – James R.
    7 hours ago











  • "The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

    – csk
    7 hours ago
















The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

– csk
8 hours ago





The main CRS of your map doesn't matter for this purpose. As long as the CRS of each layer is correctly assigned, QGIS can display them so that they line up. This feature is called "on-the-fly reprojection; in QGIS 3 it happens automatically, and in earlier versions you could turn it on and off through project properties menu. If you have OTF reprojection turned on, the problem might be that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS. The most common cause would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. Or maybe the "generated CRS" is incorrect.

– csk
8 hours ago













If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

– csk
8 hours ago





If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS. Also, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then see if you can find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer.

– csk
8 hours ago













And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

– csk
7 hours ago





And can you provide links to the original source data? You can use the edit link under your question to add them.

– csk
7 hours ago













I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

– James R.
7 hours ago





I remove/added all the layers without making any changes in the CRS, but I'm still getting same results. Also, didn't find anything in the metadata of the relief map. Anything else I can do?

– James R.
7 hours ago













"The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

– csk
7 hours ago





"The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection." It looks like you have the Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection version. Try setting the CRS (in the layer properties) to a CRS in the "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area" section of the CRS selector. EPSG:2163 (US National Atlas Equal Area) sounds like a reasonable one to try.

– csk
7 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3














From the screenshot, it's clear that this is a projection issue. The layers all have sufficient detail, that their misalignment cannot be due to low resolution. Also, they are offset by varying amounts in different places. So, to fix this issue we have to figure out the cause of the projection issue. Here are the various things to check:



  1. If using a version of QGIS older than 3.0, make sure on-the-fly reprojection is turned on. This feature allows you to have layers in different CRS's displayed on the same map. QGIS displays them projected into the same CRS, without any need to change the source data. In QGIS 3.0 and later, on-the-fly reprojection is always on.



  2. Once we know that you have OTF reprojection turned on (or are using QGIS 3.0 or later), the most likely cause is that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS.



    • The most common cause of an incorrect CRS would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS.


    • Another possible cause is that the layer did not automatically load with the correct CRS. To fix this, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then try to find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer. Change the CRS of the layer in the layer properties to the correct CRS. You may need to make a few guesses, and try a few different CRS's until you find the right one.



In this case, the most likely culprit is the Relief map layer (full name: Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution), because it's in a "generated CRS." Always be suspicious of a layer that automatically loads in a "generated CRS."



The Relief layer doesn't have any helpful information in the metadata or layer properties. However, if we go to the source website, at the very bottom of the page is the information we need:




The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.




Now we know this layer is either in a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection or an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.



On this page, we can see a list of all the related layers. There are layers called



  • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution" and

  • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution Albers Projection"

Obviously the one with "Albers Projection" in the name is in an Albers projection, so by process of elimination we can assume that our layer is in Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection.



So now we go into the layer properties and change the CRS to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection. In the CRS selector window, in the section called "Coordinate Reference Systems of the World, scroll down until you find the section called "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area." (Don't be enticed by "Lambert Conformal Conic.")



enter image description here



QGIS has 21 options for Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projections, but fortunately only one of them sounds remotely reasonable for this area of interest: US National Atlas Equal Area EPSG:2163



Notes:



  • If there's more than one reasonable-sounding CRS, try them all, and use the one that makes the layer correctly align with the other layers.

  • This method depends on having at least one layer that you know is correctly aligned. If you're not sure that any of your layers is in the correct CRS, then you can't use them for comparison. Instead, use the QuickMapServices plugin to obtain a basemap such as Open Street Map.





share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "79"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f325192%2fusgs-relief-map-geotiff-raster-misaligns-with-vector-layers-qgis%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    From the screenshot, it's clear that this is a projection issue. The layers all have sufficient detail, that their misalignment cannot be due to low resolution. Also, they are offset by varying amounts in different places. So, to fix this issue we have to figure out the cause of the projection issue. Here are the various things to check:



    1. If using a version of QGIS older than 3.0, make sure on-the-fly reprojection is turned on. This feature allows you to have layers in different CRS's displayed on the same map. QGIS displays them projected into the same CRS, without any need to change the source data. In QGIS 3.0 and later, on-the-fly reprojection is always on.



    2. Once we know that you have OTF reprojection turned on (or are using QGIS 3.0 or later), the most likely cause is that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS.



      • The most common cause of an incorrect CRS would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS.


      • Another possible cause is that the layer did not automatically load with the correct CRS. To fix this, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then try to find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer. Change the CRS of the layer in the layer properties to the correct CRS. You may need to make a few guesses, and try a few different CRS's until you find the right one.



    In this case, the most likely culprit is the Relief map layer (full name: Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution), because it's in a "generated CRS." Always be suspicious of a layer that automatically loads in a "generated CRS."



    The Relief layer doesn't have any helpful information in the metadata or layer properties. However, if we go to the source website, at the very bottom of the page is the information we need:




    The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.




    Now we know this layer is either in a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection or an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.



    On this page, we can see a list of all the related layers. There are layers called



    • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution" and

    • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution Albers Projection"

    Obviously the one with "Albers Projection" in the name is in an Albers projection, so by process of elimination we can assume that our layer is in Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection.



    So now we go into the layer properties and change the CRS to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection. In the CRS selector window, in the section called "Coordinate Reference Systems of the World, scroll down until you find the section called "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area." (Don't be enticed by "Lambert Conformal Conic.")



    enter image description here



    QGIS has 21 options for Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projections, but fortunately only one of them sounds remotely reasonable for this area of interest: US National Atlas Equal Area EPSG:2163



    Notes:



    • If there's more than one reasonable-sounding CRS, try them all, and use the one that makes the layer correctly align with the other layers.

    • This method depends on having at least one layer that you know is correctly aligned. If you're not sure that any of your layers is in the correct CRS, then you can't use them for comparison. Instead, use the QuickMapServices plugin to obtain a basemap such as Open Street Map.





    share|improve this answer



























      3














      From the screenshot, it's clear that this is a projection issue. The layers all have sufficient detail, that their misalignment cannot be due to low resolution. Also, they are offset by varying amounts in different places. So, to fix this issue we have to figure out the cause of the projection issue. Here are the various things to check:



      1. If using a version of QGIS older than 3.0, make sure on-the-fly reprojection is turned on. This feature allows you to have layers in different CRS's displayed on the same map. QGIS displays them projected into the same CRS, without any need to change the source data. In QGIS 3.0 and later, on-the-fly reprojection is always on.



      2. Once we know that you have OTF reprojection turned on (or are using QGIS 3.0 or later), the most likely cause is that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS.



        • The most common cause of an incorrect CRS would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS.


        • Another possible cause is that the layer did not automatically load with the correct CRS. To fix this, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then try to find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer. Change the CRS of the layer in the layer properties to the correct CRS. You may need to make a few guesses, and try a few different CRS's until you find the right one.



      In this case, the most likely culprit is the Relief map layer (full name: Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution), because it's in a "generated CRS." Always be suspicious of a layer that automatically loads in a "generated CRS."



      The Relief layer doesn't have any helpful information in the metadata or layer properties. However, if we go to the source website, at the very bottom of the page is the information we need:




      The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.




      Now we know this layer is either in a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection or an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.



      On this page, we can see a list of all the related layers. There are layers called



      • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution" and

      • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution Albers Projection"

      Obviously the one with "Albers Projection" in the name is in an Albers projection, so by process of elimination we can assume that our layer is in Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection.



      So now we go into the layer properties and change the CRS to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection. In the CRS selector window, in the section called "Coordinate Reference Systems of the World, scroll down until you find the section called "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area." (Don't be enticed by "Lambert Conformal Conic.")



      enter image description here



      QGIS has 21 options for Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projections, but fortunately only one of them sounds remotely reasonable for this area of interest: US National Atlas Equal Area EPSG:2163



      Notes:



      • If there's more than one reasonable-sounding CRS, try them all, and use the one that makes the layer correctly align with the other layers.

      • This method depends on having at least one layer that you know is correctly aligned. If you're not sure that any of your layers is in the correct CRS, then you can't use them for comparison. Instead, use the QuickMapServices plugin to obtain a basemap such as Open Street Map.





      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3







        From the screenshot, it's clear that this is a projection issue. The layers all have sufficient detail, that their misalignment cannot be due to low resolution. Also, they are offset by varying amounts in different places. So, to fix this issue we have to figure out the cause of the projection issue. Here are the various things to check:



        1. If using a version of QGIS older than 3.0, make sure on-the-fly reprojection is turned on. This feature allows you to have layers in different CRS's displayed on the same map. QGIS displays them projected into the same CRS, without any need to change the source data. In QGIS 3.0 and later, on-the-fly reprojection is always on.



        2. Once we know that you have OTF reprojection turned on (or are using QGIS 3.0 or later), the most likely cause is that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS.



          • The most common cause of an incorrect CRS would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS.


          • Another possible cause is that the layer did not automatically load with the correct CRS. To fix this, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then try to find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer. Change the CRS of the layer in the layer properties to the correct CRS. You may need to make a few guesses, and try a few different CRS's until you find the right one.



        In this case, the most likely culprit is the Relief map layer (full name: Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution), because it's in a "generated CRS." Always be suspicious of a layer that automatically loads in a "generated CRS."



        The Relief layer doesn't have any helpful information in the metadata or layer properties. However, if we go to the source website, at the very bottom of the page is the information we need:




        The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.




        Now we know this layer is either in a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection or an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.



        On this page, we can see a list of all the related layers. There are layers called



        • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution" and

        • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution Albers Projection"

        Obviously the one with "Albers Projection" in the name is in an Albers projection, so by process of elimination we can assume that our layer is in Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection.



        So now we go into the layer properties and change the CRS to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection. In the CRS selector window, in the section called "Coordinate Reference Systems of the World, scroll down until you find the section called "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area." (Don't be enticed by "Lambert Conformal Conic.")



        enter image description here



        QGIS has 21 options for Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projections, but fortunately only one of them sounds remotely reasonable for this area of interest: US National Atlas Equal Area EPSG:2163



        Notes:



        • If there's more than one reasonable-sounding CRS, try them all, and use the one that makes the layer correctly align with the other layers.

        • This method depends on having at least one layer that you know is correctly aligned. If you're not sure that any of your layers is in the correct CRS, then you can't use them for comparison. Instead, use the QuickMapServices plugin to obtain a basemap such as Open Street Map.





        share|improve this answer













        From the screenshot, it's clear that this is a projection issue. The layers all have sufficient detail, that their misalignment cannot be due to low resolution. Also, they are offset by varying amounts in different places. So, to fix this issue we have to figure out the cause of the projection issue. Here are the various things to check:



        1. If using a version of QGIS older than 3.0, make sure on-the-fly reprojection is turned on. This feature allows you to have layers in different CRS's displayed on the same map. QGIS displays them projected into the same CRS, without any need to change the source data. In QGIS 3.0 and later, on-the-fly reprojection is always on.



        2. Once we know that you have OTF reprojection turned on (or are using QGIS 3.0 or later), the most likely cause is that one or more layers has an incorrect CRS.



          • The most common cause of an incorrect CRS would be if you (incorrectly) changed one of the layer's CRS through the layer properties. If you did change the CRS (in the layer property) of any of these layers, remove that layer from your map and add it back in. This will hopefully reset the layer back to its intended CRS.


          • Another possible cause is that the layer did not automatically load with the correct CRS. To fix this, look up the metadata / layer description of the relief map and see what CRS it's supposed to be in. Then try to find a pre-loaded CRS to use for that layer. Change the CRS of the layer in the layer properties to the correct CRS. You may need to make a few guesses, and try a few different CRS's until you find the right one.



        In this case, the most likely culprit is the Relief map layer (full name: Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution), because it's in a "generated CRS." Always be suspicious of a layer that automatically loads in a "generated CRS."



        The Relief layer doesn't have any helpful information in the metadata or layer properties. However, if we go to the source website, at the very bottom of the page is the information we need:




        The Grayscale United States Shaded Relief – 200 Meter Resolution map layer is available in both a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection and an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.




        Now we know this layer is either in a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection or an Albers Conical Equal-Area projection.



        On this page, we can see a list of all the related layers. There are layers called



        • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution" and

        • "Shaded Relief Land - Gray - Conterminous United States 200 Meter Resolution Albers Projection"

        Obviously the one with "Albers Projection" in the name is in an Albers projection, so by process of elimination we can assume that our layer is in Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection.



        So now we go into the layer properties and change the CRS to a Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projection. In the CRS selector window, in the section called "Coordinate Reference Systems of the World, scroll down until you find the section called "Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area." (Don't be enticed by "Lambert Conformal Conic.")



        enter image description here



        QGIS has 21 options for Lambert Azimuthal Equal-Area projections, but fortunately only one of them sounds remotely reasonable for this area of interest: US National Atlas Equal Area EPSG:2163



        Notes:



        • If there's more than one reasonable-sounding CRS, try them all, and use the one that makes the layer correctly align with the other layers.

        • This method depends on having at least one layer that you know is correctly aligned. If you're not sure that any of your layers is in the correct CRS, then you can't use them for comparison. Instead, use the QuickMapServices plugin to obtain a basemap such as Open Street Map.






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 6 hours ago









        cskcsk

        11.8k1337




        11.8k1337



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Geographic Information Systems Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgis.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f325192%2fusgs-relief-map-geotiff-raster-misaligns-with-vector-layers-qgis%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

            Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

            Smell Mother Skizze Discussion Tachometer Jar Alligator Star 끌다 자세 의문 과학적t Barbaric The round system critiques the connection. Definition: A wind instrument of music in use among the Spaniards Nasty Level 이상 분노 금년 월급 근교 Cloth Owner Permissible Shock Purring Parched Raise 오전 장면 햄 서투르다 The smash instructs the squeamish instrument. Large Nosy Nalpure Chalk Travel Crayon Bite your tongue The Hulk 신호 대사 사과하다 The work boosts the knowledgeable size. Steeplump Level Wooden Shake Teaching Jump 이제 복도 접다 공중전화 부지런하다 Rub Average Ruthless Busyglide Glost oven Didelphia Control A fly on the wall Jaws 지하철 거