Why Is Abelian Gauge Theory So Special?What is a “free” non-Abelian Yang-Mill's theory?(coordinates) Invariance/Covariance of Chern-Simons theory and Yang-Mills theoryEquations of motion for the Yang-Mills $SU(2)$ theoryEinstein-Yang-Mills ConnectionsLattice gauge theory + Chern-Simons TheoryHodge star operator in Yang-Mills theory and derivation of the YM equationsInterpretation of the field strength tensor in Yang-Mills TheoryMistake or Rewriting of Yang-Mills in NakaharaClassical Yang-Mills equation of motion with both electric and magnetic sources?Global Part of Non-Abelian Gauge Transformation

Does ultrasonic bath cleaning damage laboratory volumetric glassware calibration?

Can an Officer film me on their personal device in my own home?

Are there any vegetarian astronauts?

The difference between Rad1 and Rfd1

Does anycast addressing add additional latency in any way?

Should I include salary information on my CV?

Can I use the PWM pins as regular digital input/output pins?

Why does the numerical solution of an ODE move away from an unstable equilibrium?

A player is constantly pestering me about rules, what do I do as a DM?

Difference between 'demás' and 'otros'?

What is the olden name for sideburns?

Can I travel from Germany to England alone as an unaccompanied minor?

Transitive action of a discrete group on a compact space

Procedurally generate regions on island

Was "I have the farts, again" broadcast from the Moon to the whole world?

How do I spend money in Sweden and Denmark?

How fast can a ship with rotating habitats be accelerated?

For people who believe in Jesus and not the devil, what happend in the desert?

What are good ways to spray paint a QR code on a footpath?

Do sudoku answers always have a single minimal clue set?

How to determine what is the correct level of detail when modelling?

ArcGIS Intersect Tool not splitting lines as expected?

Should I report a leak of confidential HR information?

Why isn’t the tax system continuous rather than bracketed?



Why Is Abelian Gauge Theory So Special?


What is a “free” non-Abelian Yang-Mill's theory?(coordinates) Invariance/Covariance of Chern-Simons theory and Yang-Mills theoryEquations of motion for the Yang-Mills $SU(2)$ theoryEinstein-Yang-Mills ConnectionsLattice gauge theory + Chern-Simons TheoryHodge star operator in Yang-Mills theory and derivation of the YM equationsInterpretation of the field strength tensor in Yang-Mills TheoryMistake or Rewriting of Yang-Mills in NakaharaClassical Yang-Mills equation of motion with both electric and magnetic sources?Global Part of Non-Abelian Gauge Transformation






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


I have a perhaps stupid question about Maxwell equations.



Let $G$ be a generic Lie group. We consider a $G$-gauge theory. Let $A$ be the associated connection $1$-form, and $F=dA+Awedge A$ be the corresponding curvature tensor. The Yang-Mills equations can be written as



$$Dstar F=star J tag1.1$$



$$DF=0 tag1.2$$



Equation (1.1) follows from variation of the Lagrangian, and equation (1.2) is the Bianchi identity, which holds universally.



If the gauge group $G$ is replaced by $U(1)$, then naively one would expect the Yang-Mills equations to stay the same except $F=dA$.



However, as we all know, the Maxwell equations are



$$dstar F=star J$$



$$dF=ddA=0$$



Is there any deep geometrical reasons why $U(1)$ gauge theory is so special that one has to replace the covariant differential operator $D$ by the de-Rham differential $d$?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$


















    1












    $begingroup$


    I have a perhaps stupid question about Maxwell equations.



    Let $G$ be a generic Lie group. We consider a $G$-gauge theory. Let $A$ be the associated connection $1$-form, and $F=dA+Awedge A$ be the corresponding curvature tensor. The Yang-Mills equations can be written as



    $$Dstar F=star J tag1.1$$



    $$DF=0 tag1.2$$



    Equation (1.1) follows from variation of the Lagrangian, and equation (1.2) is the Bianchi identity, which holds universally.



    If the gauge group $G$ is replaced by $U(1)$, then naively one would expect the Yang-Mills equations to stay the same except $F=dA$.



    However, as we all know, the Maxwell equations are



    $$dstar F=star J$$



    $$dF=ddA=0$$



    Is there any deep geometrical reasons why $U(1)$ gauge theory is so special that one has to replace the covariant differential operator $D$ by the de-Rham differential $d$?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$














      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      I have a perhaps stupid question about Maxwell equations.



      Let $G$ be a generic Lie group. We consider a $G$-gauge theory. Let $A$ be the associated connection $1$-form, and $F=dA+Awedge A$ be the corresponding curvature tensor. The Yang-Mills equations can be written as



      $$Dstar F=star J tag1.1$$



      $$DF=0 tag1.2$$



      Equation (1.1) follows from variation of the Lagrangian, and equation (1.2) is the Bianchi identity, which holds universally.



      If the gauge group $G$ is replaced by $U(1)$, then naively one would expect the Yang-Mills equations to stay the same except $F=dA$.



      However, as we all know, the Maxwell equations are



      $$dstar F=star J$$



      $$dF=ddA=0$$



      Is there any deep geometrical reasons why $U(1)$ gauge theory is so special that one has to replace the covariant differential operator $D$ by the de-Rham differential $d$?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have a perhaps stupid question about Maxwell equations.



      Let $G$ be a generic Lie group. We consider a $G$-gauge theory. Let $A$ be the associated connection $1$-form, and $F=dA+Awedge A$ be the corresponding curvature tensor. The Yang-Mills equations can be written as



      $$Dstar F=star J tag1.1$$



      $$DF=0 tag1.2$$



      Equation (1.1) follows from variation of the Lagrangian, and equation (1.2) is the Bianchi identity, which holds universally.



      If the gauge group $G$ is replaced by $U(1)$, then naively one would expect the Yang-Mills equations to stay the same except $F=dA$.



      However, as we all know, the Maxwell equations are



      $$dstar F=star J$$



      $$dF=ddA=0$$



      Is there any deep geometrical reasons why $U(1)$ gauge theory is so special that one has to replace the covariant differential operator $D$ by the de-Rham differential $d$?







      differential-geometry gauge-theory maxwell-equations yang-mills






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 9 hours ago









      The Last Knight of Silk RoadThe Last Knight of Silk Road

      7242 silver badges13 bronze badges




      7242 silver badges13 bronze badges




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          Normally the $D$ would be the covariant derivative in the adjoint representation (because $F$ and $star F$ transform in the adjoint of the gauge group).



          For abelian gauge theories the adjoint representation is the trivial one (the representation with charge zero). You can either see this because $f^abc = 0$ or because the photon is electrically neutral. Hence $D$ in the adjoint representation for an abelian gauge theory is just $d$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$




















            3












            $begingroup$

            We don't "replace" the gauge covariant derivative by the ordinary differential, it is simply that case that $DF = mathrmdF$, since the adjoint representation of $mathrmU(1)$ is trivial.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$















              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "151"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487724%2fwhy-is-abelian-gauge-theory-so-special%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1












              $begingroup$

              Normally the $D$ would be the covariant derivative in the adjoint representation (because $F$ and $star F$ transform in the adjoint of the gauge group).



              For abelian gauge theories the adjoint representation is the trivial one (the representation with charge zero). You can either see this because $f^abc = 0$ or because the photon is electrically neutral. Hence $D$ in the adjoint representation for an abelian gauge theory is just $d$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                Normally the $D$ would be the covariant derivative in the adjoint representation (because $F$ and $star F$ transform in the adjoint of the gauge group).



                For abelian gauge theories the adjoint representation is the trivial one (the representation with charge zero). You can either see this because $f^abc = 0$ or because the photon is electrically neutral. Hence $D$ in the adjoint representation for an abelian gauge theory is just $d$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  Normally the $D$ would be the covariant derivative in the adjoint representation (because $F$ and $star F$ transform in the adjoint of the gauge group).



                  For abelian gauge theories the adjoint representation is the trivial one (the representation with charge zero). You can either see this because $f^abc = 0$ or because the photon is electrically neutral. Hence $D$ in the adjoint representation for an abelian gauge theory is just $d$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Normally the $D$ would be the covariant derivative in the adjoint representation (because $F$ and $star F$ transform in the adjoint of the gauge group).



                  For abelian gauge theories the adjoint representation is the trivial one (the representation with charge zero). You can either see this because $f^abc = 0$ or because the photon is electrically neutral. Hence $D$ in the adjoint representation for an abelian gauge theory is just $d$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  MannyCMannyC

                  1,5641 gold badge4 silver badges15 bronze badges




                  1,5641 gold badge4 silver badges15 bronze badges























                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      We don't "replace" the gauge covariant derivative by the ordinary differential, it is simply that case that $DF = mathrmdF$, since the adjoint representation of $mathrmU(1)$ is trivial.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$

















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        We don't "replace" the gauge covariant derivative by the ordinary differential, it is simply that case that $DF = mathrmdF$, since the adjoint representation of $mathrmU(1)$ is trivial.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$















                          3












                          3








                          3





                          $begingroup$

                          We don't "replace" the gauge covariant derivative by the ordinary differential, it is simply that case that $DF = mathrmdF$, since the adjoint representation of $mathrmU(1)$ is trivial.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          We don't "replace" the gauge covariant derivative by the ordinary differential, it is simply that case that $DF = mathrmdF$, since the adjoint representation of $mathrmU(1)$ is trivial.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 8 hours ago









                          ACuriousMindACuriousMind

                          74.5k18 gold badges137 silver badges340 bronze badges




                          74.5k18 gold badges137 silver badges340 bronze badges



























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f487724%2fwhy-is-abelian-gauge-theory-so-special%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                              Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                              19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу