The Sword in the StoneMaking a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magicStone Age Circuitry?Granite vs. steel swordSword with mercury coreWould a sonic sword be useful in the middle ages?How does a migratory species advance past the Stone Age?Use of metal arrowheads vs stone/bone arrowheads in iron-age society?Truth Stone: Effects on the justice system, and criminal worldThe resonating sword of doomRedox Magic 1: Stone-age FranceCan a one-dimensional blade cut everything ? (chainsaw) (Sword)
How acidic does a mixture have to be for milk to curdle?
"I you already know": is this proper English?
What is the lowest-speed bogey a jet fighter can intercept/escort?
What does "see" in "the Holy See" mean?
Integral of the integral using NIntegrate
What is the difference between 1/3, 1/2, and full casters?
How to handle a player that cannot be convinced his actions are a problem for both GM and party
What does コテッと mean?
Did the IBM PC use the 8088's NMI line?
How to avoid unconsciously copying the style of my favorite writer?
Marrying a second woman behind your wife's back: is it wrong and can Quran/Hadith prove this?
Why is it considered Acid Rain with pH <5.6
Piece-drop Mate #2
What is "I bet" in German?
Can the 2019 UA Artificer's Returning Weapon and Radiant Weapon infusions stack on the same weapon?
Trapped in an ocean Temple in Minecraft?
Decreasing star size
What's the difference between 2a and 10a charging options?
Send a single HTML email from Thunderbird, overriding the default "plain text" setting
How can I stop myself from micromanaging other PCs' actions?
How do I stop my characters falling in love?
At what rate does the volume (velocity) of a note decay?
Inadvertently nuked my disk permission structure - why?
Why are off grid solar setups only 12, 24, 48 VDC?
The Sword in the Stone
Making a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magicStone Age Circuitry?Granite vs. steel swordSword with mercury coreWould a sonic sword be useful in the middle ages?How does a migratory species advance past the Stone Age?Use of metal arrowheads vs stone/bone arrowheads in iron-age society?Truth Stone: Effects on the justice system, and criminal worldThe resonating sword of doomRedox Magic 1: Stone-age FranceCan a one-dimensional blade cut everything ? (chainsaw) (Sword)
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I am trying to recreate King Arthur's the Sword in the Stone using chemistry.
I have a couple ideas how this could be done Would any of these work or how it might work?
Arthur removes the sword from the stone and is blessed by Archbishop Brice, from Le Livre de Merlin, France, N. (Arras), 1310, Add MS 38117, f. 73v." Caption via the British Library's Medieval Manuscripts Blog.
Unlike this answer: Making a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magic I am interested how this could have been done with a substance available in 500AD.
What could be smelted or concreted then to allow a sword to be entered into it then allowed to cool or harden with no chemical bond to the sword?
The material of the stone would need to contract as it gets colder to release the sword at a certain temperature, not be so hot during insertion to effect the temper of the sword, and/or allow water or ice to permeate between the sword and stone.
Similar to using whiteout to create a barrier between the soft iron shell and the inside hard steel of a canister Damascus forge could the sword be coated with a whiteout/liquid paper like material that breaks down when wet over time?
Could water get between a designer stone and sword enough to erode or breakdown the bond between the sword and the stone?
The simplest way this could be done I can think of is thrusting the sword into a ball of lava rock that meets the edge of an ocean then moved and carved. Over time water and winter loosen the sword.
science-based technology chemistry middle-ages
$endgroup$
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to recreate King Arthur's the Sword in the Stone using chemistry.
I have a couple ideas how this could be done Would any of these work or how it might work?
Arthur removes the sword from the stone and is blessed by Archbishop Brice, from Le Livre de Merlin, France, N. (Arras), 1310, Add MS 38117, f. 73v." Caption via the British Library's Medieval Manuscripts Blog.
Unlike this answer: Making a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magic I am interested how this could have been done with a substance available in 500AD.
What could be smelted or concreted then to allow a sword to be entered into it then allowed to cool or harden with no chemical bond to the sword?
The material of the stone would need to contract as it gets colder to release the sword at a certain temperature, not be so hot during insertion to effect the temper of the sword, and/or allow water or ice to permeate between the sword and stone.
Similar to using whiteout to create a barrier between the soft iron shell and the inside hard steel of a canister Damascus forge could the sword be coated with a whiteout/liquid paper like material that breaks down when wet over time?
Could water get between a designer stone and sword enough to erode or breakdown the bond between the sword and the stone?
The simplest way this could be done I can think of is thrusting the sword into a ball of lava rock that meets the edge of an ocean then moved and carved. Over time water and winter loosen the sword.
science-based technology chemistry middle-ages
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Could you please include a clear definition of what you mean by "whiteout"? When I look it up, it just comes up with a load of film references. That product may not be available in all the countries that our members live in. Can you clarify please? Also, are you asserting that the sword is not corrosion resistant, like just a normal steel sword, what's to stop atmospheric moisture from corroding the tang and expanding to destroy the handle?
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
...Cont. At the moment your question seems to be story based and has little to do with worldbuilding. It would perhaps help if you provided context that gave us the worldbuilding problem in a nutshell.
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Confoundedbybeigefish. Whiteout is a generic term for liquid paper often known by the brand name Tipex. The white fluid painted onto paper to correct spelling mistakes when typing or writing by hand. There is an American TV show called Forged in Fire that has highlighted its use in the sword making process.
$endgroup$
– Sarriesfan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sticking the sword in lava will ruin the temper of the steel, Getting steel more than a few hundred degrees will ruin the temper.
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Whiteout will have no effect on the heat ruining the temper of the steel. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempering_(metallurgy)
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to recreate King Arthur's the Sword in the Stone using chemistry.
I have a couple ideas how this could be done Would any of these work or how it might work?
Arthur removes the sword from the stone and is blessed by Archbishop Brice, from Le Livre de Merlin, France, N. (Arras), 1310, Add MS 38117, f. 73v." Caption via the British Library's Medieval Manuscripts Blog.
Unlike this answer: Making a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magic I am interested how this could have been done with a substance available in 500AD.
What could be smelted or concreted then to allow a sword to be entered into it then allowed to cool or harden with no chemical bond to the sword?
The material of the stone would need to contract as it gets colder to release the sword at a certain temperature, not be so hot during insertion to effect the temper of the sword, and/or allow water or ice to permeate between the sword and stone.
Similar to using whiteout to create a barrier between the soft iron shell and the inside hard steel of a canister Damascus forge could the sword be coated with a whiteout/liquid paper like material that breaks down when wet over time?
Could water get between a designer stone and sword enough to erode or breakdown the bond between the sword and the stone?
The simplest way this could be done I can think of is thrusting the sword into a ball of lava rock that meets the edge of an ocean then moved and carved. Over time water and winter loosen the sword.
science-based technology chemistry middle-ages
$endgroup$
I am trying to recreate King Arthur's the Sword in the Stone using chemistry.
I have a couple ideas how this could be done Would any of these work or how it might work?
Arthur removes the sword from the stone and is blessed by Archbishop Brice, from Le Livre de Merlin, France, N. (Arras), 1310, Add MS 38117, f. 73v." Caption via the British Library's Medieval Manuscripts Blog.
Unlike this answer: Making a sword in the stone, in a medieval world without magic I am interested how this could have been done with a substance available in 500AD.
What could be smelted or concreted then to allow a sword to be entered into it then allowed to cool or harden with no chemical bond to the sword?
The material of the stone would need to contract as it gets colder to release the sword at a certain temperature, not be so hot during insertion to effect the temper of the sword, and/or allow water or ice to permeate between the sword and stone.
Similar to using whiteout to create a barrier between the soft iron shell and the inside hard steel of a canister Damascus forge could the sword be coated with a whiteout/liquid paper like material that breaks down when wet over time?
Could water get between a designer stone and sword enough to erode or breakdown the bond between the sword and the stone?
The simplest way this could be done I can think of is thrusting the sword into a ball of lava rock that meets the edge of an ocean then moved and carved. Over time water and winter loosen the sword.
science-based technology chemistry middle-ages
science-based technology chemistry middle-ages
edited 7 hours ago
Muze
asked 9 hours ago
MuzeMuze
7071 gold badge8 silver badges30 bronze badges
7071 gold badge8 silver badges30 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Could you please include a clear definition of what you mean by "whiteout"? When I look it up, it just comes up with a load of film references. That product may not be available in all the countries that our members live in. Can you clarify please? Also, are you asserting that the sword is not corrosion resistant, like just a normal steel sword, what's to stop atmospheric moisture from corroding the tang and expanding to destroy the handle?
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
...Cont. At the moment your question seems to be story based and has little to do with worldbuilding. It would perhaps help if you provided context that gave us the worldbuilding problem in a nutshell.
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Confoundedbybeigefish. Whiteout is a generic term for liquid paper often known by the brand name Tipex. The white fluid painted onto paper to correct spelling mistakes when typing or writing by hand. There is an American TV show called Forged in Fire that has highlighted its use in the sword making process.
$endgroup$
– Sarriesfan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sticking the sword in lava will ruin the temper of the steel, Getting steel more than a few hundred degrees will ruin the temper.
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Whiteout will have no effect on the heat ruining the temper of the steel. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempering_(metallurgy)
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
$begingroup$
Could you please include a clear definition of what you mean by "whiteout"? When I look it up, it just comes up with a load of film references. That product may not be available in all the countries that our members live in. Can you clarify please? Also, are you asserting that the sword is not corrosion resistant, like just a normal steel sword, what's to stop atmospheric moisture from corroding the tang and expanding to destroy the handle?
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
...Cont. At the moment your question seems to be story based and has little to do with worldbuilding. It would perhaps help if you provided context that gave us the worldbuilding problem in a nutshell.
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Confoundedbybeigefish. Whiteout is a generic term for liquid paper often known by the brand name Tipex. The white fluid painted onto paper to correct spelling mistakes when typing or writing by hand. There is an American TV show called Forged in Fire that has highlighted its use in the sword making process.
$endgroup$
– Sarriesfan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sticking the sword in lava will ruin the temper of the steel, Getting steel more than a few hundred degrees will ruin the temper.
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Whiteout will have no effect on the heat ruining the temper of the steel. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempering_(metallurgy)
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Could you please include a clear definition of what you mean by "whiteout"? When I look it up, it just comes up with a load of film references. That product may not be available in all the countries that our members live in. Can you clarify please? Also, are you asserting that the sword is not corrosion resistant, like just a normal steel sword, what's to stop atmospheric moisture from corroding the tang and expanding to destroy the handle?
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
Could you please include a clear definition of what you mean by "whiteout"? When I look it up, it just comes up with a load of film references. That product may not be available in all the countries that our members live in. Can you clarify please? Also, are you asserting that the sword is not corrosion resistant, like just a normal steel sword, what's to stop atmospheric moisture from corroding the tang and expanding to destroy the handle?
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
...Cont. At the moment your question seems to be story based and has little to do with worldbuilding. It would perhaps help if you provided context that gave us the worldbuilding problem in a nutshell.
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
...Cont. At the moment your question seems to be story based and has little to do with worldbuilding. It would perhaps help if you provided context that gave us the worldbuilding problem in a nutshell.
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Confoundedbybeigefish. Whiteout is a generic term for liquid paper often known by the brand name Tipex. The white fluid painted onto paper to correct spelling mistakes when typing or writing by hand. There is an American TV show called Forged in Fire that has highlighted its use in the sword making process.
$endgroup$
– Sarriesfan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Confoundedbybeigefish. Whiteout is a generic term for liquid paper often known by the brand name Tipex. The white fluid painted onto paper to correct spelling mistakes when typing or writing by hand. There is an American TV show called Forged in Fire that has highlighted its use in the sword making process.
$endgroup$
– Sarriesfan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sticking the sword in lava will ruin the temper of the steel, Getting steel more than a few hundred degrees will ruin the temper.
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sticking the sword in lava will ruin the temper of the steel, Getting steel more than a few hundred degrees will ruin the temper.
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Whiteout will have no effect on the heat ruining the temper of the steel. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempering_(metallurgy)
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Whiteout will have no effect on the heat ruining the temper of the steel. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempering_(metallurgy)
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
|
show 5 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You could use Roman concrete
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_concrete
Roman concrete, also called opus caementicium, was a material used in
construction during the late Roman Republic until the fading of the
Roman Empire. Roman concrete was based on a hydraulic-setting cement.
Recently, it has been found that it materially differs in several ways
from modern concrete which is based on Portland cement. Roman concrete
is durable due to its incorporation of volcanic ash, which prevents
cracks from spreading... Further
innovative developments in the material, called the Concrete
Revolution, contributed to structurally complicated forms, such as the
Pantheon dome, the world's largest and oldest unreinforced concrete
dome.
The Pantheon is 2000 years old and looking very, very good. Roman concrete is poured and cast like modern concrete, but is chemically different from modern concrete in several ways. If you are materials-science inclined, recent studies of Roman concrete make for interesting reading. To release the sword the concrete does not contract, but the metallic sword does. It needs to get really cold.
Your sword is embedded in Roman concrete and has been since Roman-trained engineers put it there 150 years before your story. Dark ages medieval Britons would know of the Romans and be familiar with their works but would likely have lost the arts of reproducing their technology - which is what really happened.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
For added spice, the way the Romans make concrete used materials not found on the British Isles, specifically pozzolanic ash, which is a sort of natural cement. So there was no reason for Britons to remember how make concrete -- they did not have raw materials anyway. The sword-in-stone must have been set up with imported materials.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP - that is a very interesting observation. I wonder if roman cement found outside Italy used imported volcanic ash? It is a long way to carry ash. Let me see...
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@AlexP: Example: the seawall in Roman Palestine. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarea_Maritima#Construction_techniques And in the text: "Herod imported over 24,000 m3 of pozzolana from the name-giving town of Putoli, today Puzzoli in Italy, to construct the two breakwaters:" So you are right - imported ash.
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Great example, and good confirmation that indeed they were perfectly able to import natural cement when they need and wanted to. Ties in with the answer, too!
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Muze: "How much roman stuff is found outside Italy at that time?" Quite a lot. Lots and lots. By the 1st century CE the vast majority of the Romans were not Italiots/Italians anyway. That's the entire idea of an "empire". (And this is where most modern empires failed. In a successful empire one doesn't go about making petty distinctions between people from the original provinces and people from other provinces. Once you got around and conquered Hispania and Syria you should make sure that Hispanians and Syrians can become senators, generals and emperors just like anybody else.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to recreate King Arthur's the Sword in the Stone using chemistry
Chemical
You could use thixotropism and come up with a sword that cannot be removed from its stone scabbard no matter how hard you pull, unless the sword is rattled gently for a couple of minutes beforehand. However, this solution is almost surely bound to undergo degradation along the years.
Mechanical
The simplest way to reproduce the effect would be with a friction lock. Basically, the Stone has a wide hollow "sleeve" inside, not so large as to perceivably alter the Stone's mass or balance; the sleeve is drilled from the bottom side of the Stone and stops a few inches from the surface of the top side, where it narrows to the exact width and thickness of the Sword's blade. So, from above, the Sword is set in the Stone. If this was the whole setup, the Sword would be very easy to extract.
But inside the sleeve you have two steel prongs as long as the blade, covered with a layer of soft lead. Once pressed against the blade, the blade bites the lead and leaves its exact impression; if the rods are kept pressed hard against the blade, the friction is so high that you will never be able to extract the blade, not even using levers. You'd break the blade hilt first.
Now the prongs are kept in place by a counterweight mechanism hosted in a small chamber beneath the stone. The mechanism can work in several ways: it can be "remote-controlled" from a nearby cloister through a wire or light chain pulled through a tube, or it can be released by placing weight on specific stones. One could even devise a "combination lock" so that you'd need to put your weight on stone A, then B, then A, then C, then B to achieve release. Of course anyone would feel the pavement stones wobble slightly, but if most of the flagstones were equally wobbly, nobody would think twice about it. If the mechanism were controlled by pulling a pin attached to an underground chain in a tube, even the wielder of the Sword would never know how the trick was done.
Approximately:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thixotropism... so it's held in place by ketchup?
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gypsum. Also known as drywall. Gypsum plaster has been used for millennia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmbk8Pfau0I
With a little artistry, you could easily cast it into the shape of a big rock around a sword. Throw in some darker sand/gravel and maybe some bigger stones, to give the appearance of natural occlusions.
The big advantage gypsum has over concrete is that it's not all that strong. A big guy could possibly pull a sword out, whereas I'd think cement/concrete would be impossible. The sword in that case is basically rebar.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can take advantage of the fact that when dissimilar materials are in contact, they will typically have differing coefficients of thermal expansion.
Basically, as solid objects get hotter, they expand, and they contract as they get cooler. The difference between the coefficients of the materials involved can be used to create a system that will release the blade under the appropriate thermal conditions.
Steel has a coefficient of expansion of around 12 nm/mK. Granite, a common, hard, weather-resistant stone has a coefficient of expansion of around 7.9 nm/mK.
This means that for every linear metre of the substance, for every degree Kelvin that its temperature increases, it will expand x nanometres.
The problem is that 7.9 and 12 are quite similar... the difference is only 4.1nm/mK, meaning that quite a large negative temperature differential would be required to cause the sword to release from the stone.
However!
The system need not be mechanically so simple as a sword in a blade-shaped hole in a solid block of granite requiring a significant, prolonged, drop in temperature to cause the blade to contract sufficiently to release from the stone.
If we were to have two blocks of granite, each forming half of a vertical cylinder split vertically through its diameter, with a blade-shaped notch in each side, so that with the sword between them, the stones don't quite meet, held together by a circular steel strap, like the steel tyre on a wooden wagon wheel, we would have a system where a relatively small increase in temperature would result in a relatively great expansion of the steel strap (because it is much longer, by a factor of Pi×Diameter than the gap between the stones). This would allow us to create a system where the sword would become loose at or above a specific temperature. By surrounding the stone with a fire, the strap could be made to expand enough, while ordinary daytime temperatures would not, or the strap could be sized to release only on the hottest of daytime temperatures.
This would also have the advantage that rhe sword would not become blunted by its compression in the stone(s), and it could be preserved from rust by filling the gap between stones with a resin.
All of this is easily achievable with iron age technology.
The steel strap could be embossed to make it look decorative, rather than the key piece of the lock, so only a wheelwright pr perhaps a blacksmith would likely consider the mechanism by which the sword might be released... and in the middle ages, knights didn't soil their hands with manual labour, or bother themselves to understand what it is that craftsmen do.
Knights guard the stone, and will allow only another knight to approach... so only a knight who actually thinks about the common people is likely to figure it out or be popular enough and receptive enough to be told and listen.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
cutting a precise sword shaped hole in granite is unfortunately not achievable with iron age technology.
$endgroup$
– John
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course it is @John. It need not be too precise, since that is what the slight gap between the stones is for. It is not a hole in the stones, it is a notch on the sides of two stones. Easy to achieve with a hammer and chisel.
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
Not with a chisel but you can saw stone easily enough as long as you are patient,
$endgroup$
– John
4 mins ago
$begingroup$
The ancient Egyptians could do it, any mason could do it in the middle ages. Masonry was how stone castles and bridges were built .
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
2 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151750%2fthe-sword-in-the-stone%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
You could use Roman concrete
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_concrete
Roman concrete, also called opus caementicium, was a material used in
construction during the late Roman Republic until the fading of the
Roman Empire. Roman concrete was based on a hydraulic-setting cement.
Recently, it has been found that it materially differs in several ways
from modern concrete which is based on Portland cement. Roman concrete
is durable due to its incorporation of volcanic ash, which prevents
cracks from spreading... Further
innovative developments in the material, called the Concrete
Revolution, contributed to structurally complicated forms, such as the
Pantheon dome, the world's largest and oldest unreinforced concrete
dome.
The Pantheon is 2000 years old and looking very, very good. Roman concrete is poured and cast like modern concrete, but is chemically different from modern concrete in several ways. If you are materials-science inclined, recent studies of Roman concrete make for interesting reading. To release the sword the concrete does not contract, but the metallic sword does. It needs to get really cold.
Your sword is embedded in Roman concrete and has been since Roman-trained engineers put it there 150 years before your story. Dark ages medieval Britons would know of the Romans and be familiar with their works but would likely have lost the arts of reproducing their technology - which is what really happened.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
For added spice, the way the Romans make concrete used materials not found on the British Isles, specifically pozzolanic ash, which is a sort of natural cement. So there was no reason for Britons to remember how make concrete -- they did not have raw materials anyway. The sword-in-stone must have been set up with imported materials.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP - that is a very interesting observation. I wonder if roman cement found outside Italy used imported volcanic ash? It is a long way to carry ash. Let me see...
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@AlexP: Example: the seawall in Roman Palestine. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarea_Maritima#Construction_techniques And in the text: "Herod imported over 24,000 m3 of pozzolana from the name-giving town of Putoli, today Puzzoli in Italy, to construct the two breakwaters:" So you are right - imported ash.
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Great example, and good confirmation that indeed they were perfectly able to import natural cement when they need and wanted to. Ties in with the answer, too!
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Muze: "How much roman stuff is found outside Italy at that time?" Quite a lot. Lots and lots. By the 1st century CE the vast majority of the Romans were not Italiots/Italians anyway. That's the entire idea of an "empire". (And this is where most modern empires failed. In a successful empire one doesn't go about making petty distinctions between people from the original provinces and people from other provinces. Once you got around and conquered Hispania and Syria you should make sure that Hispanians and Syrians can become senators, generals and emperors just like anybody else.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
You could use Roman concrete
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_concrete
Roman concrete, also called opus caementicium, was a material used in
construction during the late Roman Republic until the fading of the
Roman Empire. Roman concrete was based on a hydraulic-setting cement.
Recently, it has been found that it materially differs in several ways
from modern concrete which is based on Portland cement. Roman concrete
is durable due to its incorporation of volcanic ash, which prevents
cracks from spreading... Further
innovative developments in the material, called the Concrete
Revolution, contributed to structurally complicated forms, such as the
Pantheon dome, the world's largest and oldest unreinforced concrete
dome.
The Pantheon is 2000 years old and looking very, very good. Roman concrete is poured and cast like modern concrete, but is chemically different from modern concrete in several ways. If you are materials-science inclined, recent studies of Roman concrete make for interesting reading. To release the sword the concrete does not contract, but the metallic sword does. It needs to get really cold.
Your sword is embedded in Roman concrete and has been since Roman-trained engineers put it there 150 years before your story. Dark ages medieval Britons would know of the Romans and be familiar with their works but would likely have lost the arts of reproducing their technology - which is what really happened.
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
For added spice, the way the Romans make concrete used materials not found on the British Isles, specifically pozzolanic ash, which is a sort of natural cement. So there was no reason for Britons to remember how make concrete -- they did not have raw materials anyway. The sword-in-stone must have been set up with imported materials.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP - that is a very interesting observation. I wonder if roman cement found outside Italy used imported volcanic ash? It is a long way to carry ash. Let me see...
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@AlexP: Example: the seawall in Roman Palestine. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarea_Maritima#Construction_techniques And in the text: "Herod imported over 24,000 m3 of pozzolana from the name-giving town of Putoli, today Puzzoli in Italy, to construct the two breakwaters:" So you are right - imported ash.
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Great example, and good confirmation that indeed they were perfectly able to import natural cement when they need and wanted to. Ties in with the answer, too!
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Muze: "How much roman stuff is found outside Italy at that time?" Quite a lot. Lots and lots. By the 1st century CE the vast majority of the Romans were not Italiots/Italians anyway. That's the entire idea of an "empire". (And this is where most modern empires failed. In a successful empire one doesn't go about making petty distinctions between people from the original provinces and people from other provinces. Once you got around and conquered Hispania and Syria you should make sure that Hispanians and Syrians can become senators, generals and emperors just like anybody else.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
You could use Roman concrete
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_concrete
Roman concrete, also called opus caementicium, was a material used in
construction during the late Roman Republic until the fading of the
Roman Empire. Roman concrete was based on a hydraulic-setting cement.
Recently, it has been found that it materially differs in several ways
from modern concrete which is based on Portland cement. Roman concrete
is durable due to its incorporation of volcanic ash, which prevents
cracks from spreading... Further
innovative developments in the material, called the Concrete
Revolution, contributed to structurally complicated forms, such as the
Pantheon dome, the world's largest and oldest unreinforced concrete
dome.
The Pantheon is 2000 years old and looking very, very good. Roman concrete is poured and cast like modern concrete, but is chemically different from modern concrete in several ways. If you are materials-science inclined, recent studies of Roman concrete make for interesting reading. To release the sword the concrete does not contract, but the metallic sword does. It needs to get really cold.
Your sword is embedded in Roman concrete and has been since Roman-trained engineers put it there 150 years before your story. Dark ages medieval Britons would know of the Romans and be familiar with their works but would likely have lost the arts of reproducing their technology - which is what really happened.
$endgroup$
You could use Roman concrete
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_concrete
Roman concrete, also called opus caementicium, was a material used in
construction during the late Roman Republic until the fading of the
Roman Empire. Roman concrete was based on a hydraulic-setting cement.
Recently, it has been found that it materially differs in several ways
from modern concrete which is based on Portland cement. Roman concrete
is durable due to its incorporation of volcanic ash, which prevents
cracks from spreading... Further
innovative developments in the material, called the Concrete
Revolution, contributed to structurally complicated forms, such as the
Pantheon dome, the world's largest and oldest unreinforced concrete
dome.
The Pantheon is 2000 years old and looking very, very good. Roman concrete is poured and cast like modern concrete, but is chemically different from modern concrete in several ways. If you are materials-science inclined, recent studies of Roman concrete make for interesting reading. To release the sword the concrete does not contract, but the metallic sword does. It needs to get really cold.
Your sword is embedded in Roman concrete and has been since Roman-trained engineers put it there 150 years before your story. Dark ages medieval Britons would know of the Romans and be familiar with their works but would likely have lost the arts of reproducing their technology - which is what really happened.
answered 8 hours ago
WillkWillk
131k33 gold badges246 silver badges549 bronze badges
131k33 gold badges246 silver badges549 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
For added spice, the way the Romans make concrete used materials not found on the British Isles, specifically pozzolanic ash, which is a sort of natural cement. So there was no reason for Britons to remember how make concrete -- they did not have raw materials anyway. The sword-in-stone must have been set up with imported materials.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP - that is a very interesting observation. I wonder if roman cement found outside Italy used imported volcanic ash? It is a long way to carry ash. Let me see...
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@AlexP: Example: the seawall in Roman Palestine. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarea_Maritima#Construction_techniques And in the text: "Herod imported over 24,000 m3 of pozzolana from the name-giving town of Putoli, today Puzzoli in Italy, to construct the two breakwaters:" So you are right - imported ash.
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Great example, and good confirmation that indeed they were perfectly able to import natural cement when they need and wanted to. Ties in with the answer, too!
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Muze: "How much roman stuff is found outside Italy at that time?" Quite a lot. Lots and lots. By the 1st century CE the vast majority of the Romans were not Italiots/Italians anyway. That's the entire idea of an "empire". (And this is where most modern empires failed. In a successful empire one doesn't go about making petty distinctions between people from the original provinces and people from other provinces. Once you got around and conquered Hispania and Syria you should make sure that Hispanians and Syrians can become senators, generals and emperors just like anybody else.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
2
$begingroup$
For added spice, the way the Romans make concrete used materials not found on the British Isles, specifically pozzolanic ash, which is a sort of natural cement. So there was no reason for Britons to remember how make concrete -- they did not have raw materials anyway. The sword-in-stone must have been set up with imported materials.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP - that is a very interesting observation. I wonder if roman cement found outside Italy used imported volcanic ash? It is a long way to carry ash. Let me see...
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@AlexP: Example: the seawall in Roman Palestine. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarea_Maritima#Construction_techniques And in the text: "Herod imported over 24,000 m3 of pozzolana from the name-giving town of Putoli, today Puzzoli in Italy, to construct the two breakwaters:" So you are right - imported ash.
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
Great example, and good confirmation that indeed they were perfectly able to import natural cement when they need and wanted to. Ties in with the answer, too!
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@Muze: "How much roman stuff is found outside Italy at that time?" Quite a lot. Lots and lots. By the 1st century CE the vast majority of the Romans were not Italiots/Italians anyway. That's the entire idea of an "empire". (And this is where most modern empires failed. In a successful empire one doesn't go about making petty distinctions between people from the original provinces and people from other provinces. Once you got around and conquered Hispania and Syria you should make sure that Hispanians and Syrians can become senators, generals and emperors just like anybody else.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
For added spice, the way the Romans make concrete used materials not found on the British Isles, specifically pozzolanic ash, which is a sort of natural cement. So there was no reason for Britons to remember how make concrete -- they did not have raw materials anyway. The sword-in-stone must have been set up with imported materials.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
For added spice, the way the Romans make concrete used materials not found on the British Isles, specifically pozzolanic ash, which is a sort of natural cement. So there was no reason for Britons to remember how make concrete -- they did not have raw materials anyway. The sword-in-stone must have been set up with imported materials.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP - that is a very interesting observation. I wonder if roman cement found outside Italy used imported volcanic ash? It is a long way to carry ash. Let me see...
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP - that is a very interesting observation. I wonder if roman cement found outside Italy used imported volcanic ash? It is a long way to carry ash. Let me see...
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@AlexP: Example: the seawall in Roman Palestine. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarea_Maritima#Construction_techniques And in the text: "Herod imported over 24,000 m3 of pozzolana from the name-giving town of Putoli, today Puzzoli in Italy, to construct the two breakwaters:" So you are right - imported ash.
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@AlexP: Example: the seawall in Roman Palestine. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caesarea_Maritima#Construction_techniques And in the text: "Herod imported over 24,000 m3 of pozzolana from the name-giving town of Putoli, today Puzzoli in Italy, to construct the two breakwaters:" So you are right - imported ash.
$endgroup$
– Willk
7 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
Great example, and good confirmation that indeed they were perfectly able to import natural cement when they need and wanted to. Ties in with the answer, too!
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Great example, and good confirmation that indeed they were perfectly able to import natural cement when they need and wanted to. Ties in with the answer, too!
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@Muze: "How much roman stuff is found outside Italy at that time?" Quite a lot. Lots and lots. By the 1st century CE the vast majority of the Romans were not Italiots/Italians anyway. That's the entire idea of an "empire". (And this is where most modern empires failed. In a successful empire one doesn't go about making petty distinctions between people from the original provinces and people from other provinces. Once you got around and conquered Hispania and Syria you should make sure that Hispanians and Syrians can become senators, generals and emperors just like anybody else.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Muze: "How much roman stuff is found outside Italy at that time?" Quite a lot. Lots and lots. By the 1st century CE the vast majority of the Romans were not Italiots/Italians anyway. That's the entire idea of an "empire". (And this is where most modern empires failed. In a successful empire one doesn't go about making petty distinctions between people from the original provinces and people from other provinces. Once you got around and conquered Hispania and Syria you should make sure that Hispanians and Syrians can become senators, generals and emperors just like anybody else.)
$endgroup$
– AlexP
7 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
$begingroup$
I am trying to recreate King Arthur's the Sword in the Stone using chemistry
Chemical
You could use thixotropism and come up with a sword that cannot be removed from its stone scabbard no matter how hard you pull, unless the sword is rattled gently for a couple of minutes beforehand. However, this solution is almost surely bound to undergo degradation along the years.
Mechanical
The simplest way to reproduce the effect would be with a friction lock. Basically, the Stone has a wide hollow "sleeve" inside, not so large as to perceivably alter the Stone's mass or balance; the sleeve is drilled from the bottom side of the Stone and stops a few inches from the surface of the top side, where it narrows to the exact width and thickness of the Sword's blade. So, from above, the Sword is set in the Stone. If this was the whole setup, the Sword would be very easy to extract.
But inside the sleeve you have two steel prongs as long as the blade, covered with a layer of soft lead. Once pressed against the blade, the blade bites the lead and leaves its exact impression; if the rods are kept pressed hard against the blade, the friction is so high that you will never be able to extract the blade, not even using levers. You'd break the blade hilt first.
Now the prongs are kept in place by a counterweight mechanism hosted in a small chamber beneath the stone. The mechanism can work in several ways: it can be "remote-controlled" from a nearby cloister through a wire or light chain pulled through a tube, or it can be released by placing weight on specific stones. One could even devise a "combination lock" so that you'd need to put your weight on stone A, then B, then A, then C, then B to achieve release. Of course anyone would feel the pavement stones wobble slightly, but if most of the flagstones were equally wobbly, nobody would think twice about it. If the mechanism were controlled by pulling a pin attached to an underground chain in a tube, even the wielder of the Sword would never know how the trick was done.
Approximately:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thixotropism... so it's held in place by ketchup?
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to recreate King Arthur's the Sword in the Stone using chemistry
Chemical
You could use thixotropism and come up with a sword that cannot be removed from its stone scabbard no matter how hard you pull, unless the sword is rattled gently for a couple of minutes beforehand. However, this solution is almost surely bound to undergo degradation along the years.
Mechanical
The simplest way to reproduce the effect would be with a friction lock. Basically, the Stone has a wide hollow "sleeve" inside, not so large as to perceivably alter the Stone's mass or balance; the sleeve is drilled from the bottom side of the Stone and stops a few inches from the surface of the top side, where it narrows to the exact width and thickness of the Sword's blade. So, from above, the Sword is set in the Stone. If this was the whole setup, the Sword would be very easy to extract.
But inside the sleeve you have two steel prongs as long as the blade, covered with a layer of soft lead. Once pressed against the blade, the blade bites the lead and leaves its exact impression; if the rods are kept pressed hard against the blade, the friction is so high that you will never be able to extract the blade, not even using levers. You'd break the blade hilt first.
Now the prongs are kept in place by a counterweight mechanism hosted in a small chamber beneath the stone. The mechanism can work in several ways: it can be "remote-controlled" from a nearby cloister through a wire or light chain pulled through a tube, or it can be released by placing weight on specific stones. One could even devise a "combination lock" so that you'd need to put your weight on stone A, then B, then A, then C, then B to achieve release. Of course anyone would feel the pavement stones wobble slightly, but if most of the flagstones were equally wobbly, nobody would think twice about it. If the mechanism were controlled by pulling a pin attached to an underground chain in a tube, even the wielder of the Sword would never know how the trick was done.
Approximately:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thixotropism... so it's held in place by ketchup?
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to recreate King Arthur's the Sword in the Stone using chemistry
Chemical
You could use thixotropism and come up with a sword that cannot be removed from its stone scabbard no matter how hard you pull, unless the sword is rattled gently for a couple of minutes beforehand. However, this solution is almost surely bound to undergo degradation along the years.
Mechanical
The simplest way to reproduce the effect would be with a friction lock. Basically, the Stone has a wide hollow "sleeve" inside, not so large as to perceivably alter the Stone's mass or balance; the sleeve is drilled from the bottom side of the Stone and stops a few inches from the surface of the top side, where it narrows to the exact width and thickness of the Sword's blade. So, from above, the Sword is set in the Stone. If this was the whole setup, the Sword would be very easy to extract.
But inside the sleeve you have two steel prongs as long as the blade, covered with a layer of soft lead. Once pressed against the blade, the blade bites the lead and leaves its exact impression; if the rods are kept pressed hard against the blade, the friction is so high that you will never be able to extract the blade, not even using levers. You'd break the blade hilt first.
Now the prongs are kept in place by a counterweight mechanism hosted in a small chamber beneath the stone. The mechanism can work in several ways: it can be "remote-controlled" from a nearby cloister through a wire or light chain pulled through a tube, or it can be released by placing weight on specific stones. One could even devise a "combination lock" so that you'd need to put your weight on stone A, then B, then A, then C, then B to achieve release. Of course anyone would feel the pavement stones wobble slightly, but if most of the flagstones were equally wobbly, nobody would think twice about it. If the mechanism were controlled by pulling a pin attached to an underground chain in a tube, even the wielder of the Sword would never know how the trick was done.
Approximately:
$endgroup$
I am trying to recreate King Arthur's the Sword in the Stone using chemistry
Chemical
You could use thixotropism and come up with a sword that cannot be removed from its stone scabbard no matter how hard you pull, unless the sword is rattled gently for a couple of minutes beforehand. However, this solution is almost surely bound to undergo degradation along the years.
Mechanical
The simplest way to reproduce the effect would be with a friction lock. Basically, the Stone has a wide hollow "sleeve" inside, not so large as to perceivably alter the Stone's mass or balance; the sleeve is drilled from the bottom side of the Stone and stops a few inches from the surface of the top side, where it narrows to the exact width and thickness of the Sword's blade. So, from above, the Sword is set in the Stone. If this was the whole setup, the Sword would be very easy to extract.
But inside the sleeve you have two steel prongs as long as the blade, covered with a layer of soft lead. Once pressed against the blade, the blade bites the lead and leaves its exact impression; if the rods are kept pressed hard against the blade, the friction is so high that you will never be able to extract the blade, not even using levers. You'd break the blade hilt first.
Now the prongs are kept in place by a counterweight mechanism hosted in a small chamber beneath the stone. The mechanism can work in several ways: it can be "remote-controlled" from a nearby cloister through a wire or light chain pulled through a tube, or it can be released by placing weight on specific stones. One could even devise a "combination lock" so that you'd need to put your weight on stone A, then B, then A, then C, then B to achieve release. Of course anyone would feel the pavement stones wobble slightly, but if most of the flagstones were equally wobbly, nobody would think twice about it. If the mechanism were controlled by pulling a pin attached to an underground chain in a tube, even the wielder of the Sword would never know how the trick was done.
Approximately:
answered 6 hours ago
LSerniLSerni
32.2k2 gold badges60 silver badges104 bronze badges
32.2k2 gold badges60 silver badges104 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Thixotropism... so it's held in place by ketchup?
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thixotropism... so it's held in place by ketchup?
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thixotropism... so it's held in place by ketchup?
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
Thixotropism... so it's held in place by ketchup?
$endgroup$
– DrSheldon
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gypsum. Also known as drywall. Gypsum plaster has been used for millennia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmbk8Pfau0I
With a little artistry, you could easily cast it into the shape of a big rock around a sword. Throw in some darker sand/gravel and maybe some bigger stones, to give the appearance of natural occlusions.
The big advantage gypsum has over concrete is that it's not all that strong. A big guy could possibly pull a sword out, whereas I'd think cement/concrete would be impossible. The sword in that case is basically rebar.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gypsum. Also known as drywall. Gypsum plaster has been used for millennia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmbk8Pfau0I
With a little artistry, you could easily cast it into the shape of a big rock around a sword. Throw in some darker sand/gravel and maybe some bigger stones, to give the appearance of natural occlusions.
The big advantage gypsum has over concrete is that it's not all that strong. A big guy could possibly pull a sword out, whereas I'd think cement/concrete would be impossible. The sword in that case is basically rebar.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Gypsum. Also known as drywall. Gypsum plaster has been used for millennia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmbk8Pfau0I
With a little artistry, you could easily cast it into the shape of a big rock around a sword. Throw in some darker sand/gravel and maybe some bigger stones, to give the appearance of natural occlusions.
The big advantage gypsum has over concrete is that it's not all that strong. A big guy could possibly pull a sword out, whereas I'd think cement/concrete would be impossible. The sword in that case is basically rebar.
$endgroup$
Gypsum. Also known as drywall. Gypsum plaster has been used for millennia.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmbk8Pfau0I
With a little artistry, you could easily cast it into the shape of a big rock around a sword. Throw in some darker sand/gravel and maybe some bigger stones, to give the appearance of natural occlusions.
The big advantage gypsum has over concrete is that it's not all that strong. A big guy could possibly pull a sword out, whereas I'd think cement/concrete would be impossible. The sword in that case is basically rebar.
edited 5 hours ago
answered 6 hours ago
Ryan_LRyan_L
6,20013 silver badges33 bronze badges
6,20013 silver badges33 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can take advantage of the fact that when dissimilar materials are in contact, they will typically have differing coefficients of thermal expansion.
Basically, as solid objects get hotter, they expand, and they contract as they get cooler. The difference between the coefficients of the materials involved can be used to create a system that will release the blade under the appropriate thermal conditions.
Steel has a coefficient of expansion of around 12 nm/mK. Granite, a common, hard, weather-resistant stone has a coefficient of expansion of around 7.9 nm/mK.
This means that for every linear metre of the substance, for every degree Kelvin that its temperature increases, it will expand x nanometres.
The problem is that 7.9 and 12 are quite similar... the difference is only 4.1nm/mK, meaning that quite a large negative temperature differential would be required to cause the sword to release from the stone.
However!
The system need not be mechanically so simple as a sword in a blade-shaped hole in a solid block of granite requiring a significant, prolonged, drop in temperature to cause the blade to contract sufficiently to release from the stone.
If we were to have two blocks of granite, each forming half of a vertical cylinder split vertically through its diameter, with a blade-shaped notch in each side, so that with the sword between them, the stones don't quite meet, held together by a circular steel strap, like the steel tyre on a wooden wagon wheel, we would have a system where a relatively small increase in temperature would result in a relatively great expansion of the steel strap (because it is much longer, by a factor of Pi×Diameter than the gap between the stones). This would allow us to create a system where the sword would become loose at or above a specific temperature. By surrounding the stone with a fire, the strap could be made to expand enough, while ordinary daytime temperatures would not, or the strap could be sized to release only on the hottest of daytime temperatures.
This would also have the advantage that rhe sword would not become blunted by its compression in the stone(s), and it could be preserved from rust by filling the gap between stones with a resin.
All of this is easily achievable with iron age technology.
The steel strap could be embossed to make it look decorative, rather than the key piece of the lock, so only a wheelwright pr perhaps a blacksmith would likely consider the mechanism by which the sword might be released... and in the middle ages, knights didn't soil their hands with manual labour, or bother themselves to understand what it is that craftsmen do.
Knights guard the stone, and will allow only another knight to approach... so only a knight who actually thinks about the common people is likely to figure it out or be popular enough and receptive enough to be told and listen.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
cutting a precise sword shaped hole in granite is unfortunately not achievable with iron age technology.
$endgroup$
– John
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course it is @John. It need not be too precise, since that is what the slight gap between the stones is for. It is not a hole in the stones, it is a notch on the sides of two stones. Easy to achieve with a hammer and chisel.
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
Not with a chisel but you can saw stone easily enough as long as you are patient,
$endgroup$
– John
4 mins ago
$begingroup$
The ancient Egyptians could do it, any mason could do it in the middle ages. Masonry was how stone castles and bridges were built .
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
2 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can take advantage of the fact that when dissimilar materials are in contact, they will typically have differing coefficients of thermal expansion.
Basically, as solid objects get hotter, they expand, and they contract as they get cooler. The difference between the coefficients of the materials involved can be used to create a system that will release the blade under the appropriate thermal conditions.
Steel has a coefficient of expansion of around 12 nm/mK. Granite, a common, hard, weather-resistant stone has a coefficient of expansion of around 7.9 nm/mK.
This means that for every linear metre of the substance, for every degree Kelvin that its temperature increases, it will expand x nanometres.
The problem is that 7.9 and 12 are quite similar... the difference is only 4.1nm/mK, meaning that quite a large negative temperature differential would be required to cause the sword to release from the stone.
However!
The system need not be mechanically so simple as a sword in a blade-shaped hole in a solid block of granite requiring a significant, prolonged, drop in temperature to cause the blade to contract sufficiently to release from the stone.
If we were to have two blocks of granite, each forming half of a vertical cylinder split vertically through its diameter, with a blade-shaped notch in each side, so that with the sword between them, the stones don't quite meet, held together by a circular steel strap, like the steel tyre on a wooden wagon wheel, we would have a system where a relatively small increase in temperature would result in a relatively great expansion of the steel strap (because it is much longer, by a factor of Pi×Diameter than the gap between the stones). This would allow us to create a system where the sword would become loose at or above a specific temperature. By surrounding the stone with a fire, the strap could be made to expand enough, while ordinary daytime temperatures would not, or the strap could be sized to release only on the hottest of daytime temperatures.
This would also have the advantage that rhe sword would not become blunted by its compression in the stone(s), and it could be preserved from rust by filling the gap between stones with a resin.
All of this is easily achievable with iron age technology.
The steel strap could be embossed to make it look decorative, rather than the key piece of the lock, so only a wheelwright pr perhaps a blacksmith would likely consider the mechanism by which the sword might be released... and in the middle ages, knights didn't soil their hands with manual labour, or bother themselves to understand what it is that craftsmen do.
Knights guard the stone, and will allow only another knight to approach... so only a knight who actually thinks about the common people is likely to figure it out or be popular enough and receptive enough to be told and listen.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
cutting a precise sword shaped hole in granite is unfortunately not achievable with iron age technology.
$endgroup$
– John
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course it is @John. It need not be too precise, since that is what the slight gap between the stones is for. It is not a hole in the stones, it is a notch on the sides of two stones. Easy to achieve with a hammer and chisel.
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
Not with a chisel but you can saw stone easily enough as long as you are patient,
$endgroup$
– John
4 mins ago
$begingroup$
The ancient Egyptians could do it, any mason could do it in the middle ages. Masonry was how stone castles and bridges were built .
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
2 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We can take advantage of the fact that when dissimilar materials are in contact, they will typically have differing coefficients of thermal expansion.
Basically, as solid objects get hotter, they expand, and they contract as they get cooler. The difference between the coefficients of the materials involved can be used to create a system that will release the blade under the appropriate thermal conditions.
Steel has a coefficient of expansion of around 12 nm/mK. Granite, a common, hard, weather-resistant stone has a coefficient of expansion of around 7.9 nm/mK.
This means that for every linear metre of the substance, for every degree Kelvin that its temperature increases, it will expand x nanometres.
The problem is that 7.9 and 12 are quite similar... the difference is only 4.1nm/mK, meaning that quite a large negative temperature differential would be required to cause the sword to release from the stone.
However!
The system need not be mechanically so simple as a sword in a blade-shaped hole in a solid block of granite requiring a significant, prolonged, drop in temperature to cause the blade to contract sufficiently to release from the stone.
If we were to have two blocks of granite, each forming half of a vertical cylinder split vertically through its diameter, with a blade-shaped notch in each side, so that with the sword between them, the stones don't quite meet, held together by a circular steel strap, like the steel tyre on a wooden wagon wheel, we would have a system where a relatively small increase in temperature would result in a relatively great expansion of the steel strap (because it is much longer, by a factor of Pi×Diameter than the gap between the stones). This would allow us to create a system where the sword would become loose at or above a specific temperature. By surrounding the stone with a fire, the strap could be made to expand enough, while ordinary daytime temperatures would not, or the strap could be sized to release only on the hottest of daytime temperatures.
This would also have the advantage that rhe sword would not become blunted by its compression in the stone(s), and it could be preserved from rust by filling the gap between stones with a resin.
All of this is easily achievable with iron age technology.
The steel strap could be embossed to make it look decorative, rather than the key piece of the lock, so only a wheelwright pr perhaps a blacksmith would likely consider the mechanism by which the sword might be released... and in the middle ages, knights didn't soil their hands with manual labour, or bother themselves to understand what it is that craftsmen do.
Knights guard the stone, and will allow only another knight to approach... so only a knight who actually thinks about the common people is likely to figure it out or be popular enough and receptive enough to be told and listen.
$endgroup$
We can take advantage of the fact that when dissimilar materials are in contact, they will typically have differing coefficients of thermal expansion.
Basically, as solid objects get hotter, they expand, and they contract as they get cooler. The difference between the coefficients of the materials involved can be used to create a system that will release the blade under the appropriate thermal conditions.
Steel has a coefficient of expansion of around 12 nm/mK. Granite, a common, hard, weather-resistant stone has a coefficient of expansion of around 7.9 nm/mK.
This means that for every linear metre of the substance, for every degree Kelvin that its temperature increases, it will expand x nanometres.
The problem is that 7.9 and 12 are quite similar... the difference is only 4.1nm/mK, meaning that quite a large negative temperature differential would be required to cause the sword to release from the stone.
However!
The system need not be mechanically so simple as a sword in a blade-shaped hole in a solid block of granite requiring a significant, prolonged, drop in temperature to cause the blade to contract sufficiently to release from the stone.
If we were to have two blocks of granite, each forming half of a vertical cylinder split vertically through its diameter, with a blade-shaped notch in each side, so that with the sword between them, the stones don't quite meet, held together by a circular steel strap, like the steel tyre on a wooden wagon wheel, we would have a system where a relatively small increase in temperature would result in a relatively great expansion of the steel strap (because it is much longer, by a factor of Pi×Diameter than the gap between the stones). This would allow us to create a system where the sword would become loose at or above a specific temperature. By surrounding the stone with a fire, the strap could be made to expand enough, while ordinary daytime temperatures would not, or the strap could be sized to release only on the hottest of daytime temperatures.
This would also have the advantage that rhe sword would not become blunted by its compression in the stone(s), and it could be preserved from rust by filling the gap between stones with a resin.
All of this is easily achievable with iron age technology.
The steel strap could be embossed to make it look decorative, rather than the key piece of the lock, so only a wheelwright pr perhaps a blacksmith would likely consider the mechanism by which the sword might be released... and in the middle ages, knights didn't soil their hands with manual labour, or bother themselves to understand what it is that craftsmen do.
Knights guard the stone, and will allow only another knight to approach... so only a knight who actually thinks about the common people is likely to figure it out or be popular enough and receptive enough to be told and listen.
edited 7 mins ago
answered 18 mins ago
Monty Wild♦Monty Wild
24.8k5 gold badges66 silver badges150 bronze badges
24.8k5 gold badges66 silver badges150 bronze badges
$begingroup$
cutting a precise sword shaped hole in granite is unfortunately not achievable with iron age technology.
$endgroup$
– John
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course it is @John. It need not be too precise, since that is what the slight gap between the stones is for. It is not a hole in the stones, it is a notch on the sides of two stones. Easy to achieve with a hammer and chisel.
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
Not with a chisel but you can saw stone easily enough as long as you are patient,
$endgroup$
– John
4 mins ago
$begingroup$
The ancient Egyptians could do it, any mason could do it in the middle ages. Masonry was how stone castles and bridges were built .
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
2 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
cutting a precise sword shaped hole in granite is unfortunately not achievable with iron age technology.
$endgroup$
– John
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course it is @John. It need not be too precise, since that is what the slight gap between the stones is for. It is not a hole in the stones, it is a notch on the sides of two stones. Easy to achieve with a hammer and chisel.
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
Not with a chisel but you can saw stone easily enough as long as you are patient,
$endgroup$
– John
4 mins ago
$begingroup$
The ancient Egyptians could do it, any mason could do it in the middle ages. Masonry was how stone castles and bridges were built .
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
2 mins ago
$begingroup$
cutting a precise sword shaped hole in granite is unfortunately not achievable with iron age technology.
$endgroup$
– John
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
cutting a precise sword shaped hole in granite is unfortunately not achievable with iron age technology.
$endgroup$
– John
7 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course it is @John. It need not be too precise, since that is what the slight gap between the stones is for. It is not a hole in the stones, it is a notch on the sides of two stones. Easy to achieve with a hammer and chisel.
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
Of course it is @John. It need not be too precise, since that is what the slight gap between the stones is for. It is not a hole in the stones, it is a notch on the sides of two stones. Easy to achieve with a hammer and chisel.
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
6 mins ago
$begingroup$
Not with a chisel but you can saw stone easily enough as long as you are patient,
$endgroup$
– John
4 mins ago
$begingroup$
Not with a chisel but you can saw stone easily enough as long as you are patient,
$endgroup$
– John
4 mins ago
$begingroup$
The ancient Egyptians could do it, any mason could do it in the middle ages. Masonry was how stone castles and bridges were built .
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
2 mins ago
$begingroup$
The ancient Egyptians could do it, any mason could do it in the middle ages. Masonry was how stone castles and bridges were built .
$endgroup$
– Monty Wild♦
2 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f151750%2fthe-sword-in-the-stone%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Could you please include a clear definition of what you mean by "whiteout"? When I look it up, it just comes up with a load of film references. That product may not be available in all the countries that our members live in. Can you clarify please? Also, are you asserting that the sword is not corrosion resistant, like just a normal steel sword, what's to stop atmospheric moisture from corroding the tang and expanding to destroy the handle?
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
...Cont. At the moment your question seems to be story based and has little to do with worldbuilding. It would perhaps help if you provided context that gave us the worldbuilding problem in a nutshell.
$endgroup$
– Confounded by beige fish.
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Confoundedbybeigefish. Whiteout is a generic term for liquid paper often known by the brand name Tipex. The white fluid painted onto paper to correct spelling mistakes when typing or writing by hand. There is an American TV show called Forged in Fire that has highlighted its use in the sword making process.
$endgroup$
– Sarriesfan
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sticking the sword in lava will ruin the temper of the steel, Getting steel more than a few hundred degrees will ruin the temper.
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
Whiteout will have no effect on the heat ruining the temper of the steel. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempering_(metallurgy)
$endgroup$
– John
8 hours ago