Injectivity radius of manifolds with boundaryhow to define the injectivity radius of manifolds with boundary?Injectivity radius and the cut locusThe continuity of Injectivity radiusGeodesics on manifolds with boundaryA property of geodesic triangles in manifolds with lower bounds on curvature and injectivity radiushow to define the injectivity radius of manifolds with boundary?Lower bound for the normal injectivity radiusMinimizing geodesics in incomplete Riemannian manifolds
Injectivity radius of manifolds with boundary
how to define the injectivity radius of manifolds with boundary?Injectivity radius and the cut locusThe continuity of Injectivity radiusGeodesics on manifolds with boundaryA property of geodesic triangles in manifolds with lower bounds on curvature and injectivity radiushow to define the injectivity radius of manifolds with boundary?Lower bound for the normal injectivity radiusMinimizing geodesics in incomplete Riemannian manifolds
$begingroup$
This question stems from the discussion in:
how to define the injectivity radius of manifolds with boundary?
Suppose $(M,g)$ is a compact Riemannian manifold with boundary. In this context, let the injectivity radius of a point $x$ be the minimum distance from $x$ at which there is a point $y$ with more than one length-minimizing geodesic connecting $x$ to $y$.
Is it true that the injectivity radius as defined this way is bounded below by some nonzero value? If so, is there a standard reference for this fact?
In the discussion linked above, the following theorem is referenced:
Corollary 2. If for a complete Riemannian manifold with boundary, M, the
sectional curvatures of the interior and the outward sectional curvatures of the
boundary are no greater than $K$, then $N(p,fracpi2K)$ is open in M and the
distance function from p is convex on $N(p,fracpi2K)$.
Where $N(p,fracpi2K)$ is the set of points connected to $p$ by a unique geodesic of lenght $fracpi2K$ or less.
(Reference Paper)
https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1993-339-02/S0002-9947-1993-1113693-1/S0002-9947-1993-1113693-1.pdf
This seems like it is close to the result I am looking for. Earlier in the paper, it is also stated that there are no conjugate points in $N(p,fracpiK)$.
Is there a simple step from this result that proves that the injectivity radius is nonzero?
reference-request dg.differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question stems from the discussion in:
how to define the injectivity radius of manifolds with boundary?
Suppose $(M,g)$ is a compact Riemannian manifold with boundary. In this context, let the injectivity radius of a point $x$ be the minimum distance from $x$ at which there is a point $y$ with more than one length-minimizing geodesic connecting $x$ to $y$.
Is it true that the injectivity radius as defined this way is bounded below by some nonzero value? If so, is there a standard reference for this fact?
In the discussion linked above, the following theorem is referenced:
Corollary 2. If for a complete Riemannian manifold with boundary, M, the
sectional curvatures of the interior and the outward sectional curvatures of the
boundary are no greater than $K$, then $N(p,fracpi2K)$ is open in M and the
distance function from p is convex on $N(p,fracpi2K)$.
Where $N(p,fracpi2K)$ is the set of points connected to $p$ by a unique geodesic of lenght $fracpi2K$ or less.
(Reference Paper)
https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1993-339-02/S0002-9947-1993-1113693-1/S0002-9947-1993-1113693-1.pdf
This seems like it is close to the result I am looking for. Earlier in the paper, it is also stated that there are no conjugate points in $N(p,fracpiK)$.
Is there a simple step from this result that proves that the injectivity radius is nonzero?
reference-request dg.differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This question stems from the discussion in:
how to define the injectivity radius of manifolds with boundary?
Suppose $(M,g)$ is a compact Riemannian manifold with boundary. In this context, let the injectivity radius of a point $x$ be the minimum distance from $x$ at which there is a point $y$ with more than one length-minimizing geodesic connecting $x$ to $y$.
Is it true that the injectivity radius as defined this way is bounded below by some nonzero value? If so, is there a standard reference for this fact?
In the discussion linked above, the following theorem is referenced:
Corollary 2. If for a complete Riemannian manifold with boundary, M, the
sectional curvatures of the interior and the outward sectional curvatures of the
boundary are no greater than $K$, then $N(p,fracpi2K)$ is open in M and the
distance function from p is convex on $N(p,fracpi2K)$.
Where $N(p,fracpi2K)$ is the set of points connected to $p$ by a unique geodesic of lenght $fracpi2K$ or less.
(Reference Paper)
https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1993-339-02/S0002-9947-1993-1113693-1/S0002-9947-1993-1113693-1.pdf
This seems like it is close to the result I am looking for. Earlier in the paper, it is also stated that there are no conjugate points in $N(p,fracpiK)$.
Is there a simple step from this result that proves that the injectivity radius is nonzero?
reference-request dg.differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
$endgroup$
This question stems from the discussion in:
how to define the injectivity radius of manifolds with boundary?
Suppose $(M,g)$ is a compact Riemannian manifold with boundary. In this context, let the injectivity radius of a point $x$ be the minimum distance from $x$ at which there is a point $y$ with more than one length-minimizing geodesic connecting $x$ to $y$.
Is it true that the injectivity radius as defined this way is bounded below by some nonzero value? If so, is there a standard reference for this fact?
In the discussion linked above, the following theorem is referenced:
Corollary 2. If for a complete Riemannian manifold with boundary, M, the
sectional curvatures of the interior and the outward sectional curvatures of the
boundary are no greater than $K$, then $N(p,fracpi2K)$ is open in M and the
distance function from p is convex on $N(p,fracpi2K)$.
Where $N(p,fracpi2K)$ is the set of points connected to $p$ by a unique geodesic of lenght $fracpi2K$ or less.
(Reference Paper)
https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/1993-339-02/S0002-9947-1993-1113693-1/S0002-9947-1993-1113693-1.pdf
This seems like it is close to the result I am looking for. Earlier in the paper, it is also stated that there are no conjugate points in $N(p,fracpiK)$.
Is there a simple step from this result that proves that the injectivity radius is nonzero?
reference-request dg.differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
reference-request dg.differential-geometry riemannian-geometry
asked 8 hours ago
Ryan VaughnRyan Vaughn
635 bronze badges
635 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, they show that any compact Riemannian manifold with boundary is locally $mathrmCAT(kappa)$ for some $kappainmathbbR$.
In particular the injectivity radius is positive.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "504"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f338804%2finjectivity-radius-of-manifolds-with-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Yes, they show that any compact Riemannian manifold with boundary is locally $mathrmCAT(kappa)$ for some $kappainmathbbR$.
In particular the injectivity radius is positive.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, they show that any compact Riemannian manifold with boundary is locally $mathrmCAT(kappa)$ for some $kappainmathbbR$.
In particular the injectivity radius is positive.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, they show that any compact Riemannian manifold with boundary is locally $mathrmCAT(kappa)$ for some $kappainmathbbR$.
In particular the injectivity radius is positive.
$endgroup$
Yes, they show that any compact Riemannian manifold with boundary is locally $mathrmCAT(kappa)$ for some $kappainmathbbR$.
In particular the injectivity radius is positive.
answered 7 hours ago
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a23e8/a23e89798b8a86ee39960b24eda4609bc4ef63c4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a23e8/a23e89798b8a86ee39960b24eda4609bc4ef63c4" alt=""
Anton PetruninAnton Petrunin
27.5k5 gold badges84 silver badges205 bronze badges
27.5k5 gold badges84 silver badges205 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f338804%2finjectivity-radius-of-manifolds-with-boundary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown