Where is the “conservation” in the first law of thermodynamics?first law of thermodynamics and conservation of energyHow to use the first law of thermodynamics for simple mechanical systems?first law of thermodynamics and conservation of energyThermodynamics problemWhy doesn't the adiabatic reduction of first law of thermodynamics, $W = -Delta U,$ hold for non-conservative forces?First law of thermodynamics, internal energyInternal energy in first law of thermodynamicsIs the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) also applicable to power?Confusion on a phrasing of the First Law of ThermodynamicsWhat is the difference between first law of thermodynamics and Kelvin-Planck statement?
Why we don't have vaccination against all diseases which are caused by microbes?
Why my earth simulation is slower than the reality?
Are there any plans for handling people floating away during an EVA?
What's that rattling noise from parked jets?
Is there such a thing as too inconvenient?
What does it mean to have a subnet mask /32?
Have only girls been born for a long time in this village?
Are required indicators necessary for radio buttons?
Is a butterfly one or two animals?
Why doesn't the Falcon-9 first stage use three legs to land?
Why would the US President need briefings on UFOs?
How to "know" if I have a passion?
Why is Boris Johnson visiting only Paris & Berlin if every member of the EU needs to agree on a withdrawal deal?
Can you feel passing through the sound barrier in an F-16?
The sound of thunder's like a whip
Do I have to learn /o/ or /ɔ/ separately?
Why don't politicians push for fossil fuel reduction by pointing out their scarcity?
Taking out number of subarrays from an array which contains all the distinct elements of that array
!I!n!s!e!r!t! !n!b!e!t!w!e!e!n!
Overwrite file only if data
Would nanotechnology-scale devices be vulnerable to EMP?
Why doesn't mathematics collapse even though humans quite often make mistakes in their proofs?
Can pay be witheld for hours cleaning up after closing time?
Where is the "conservation" in the first law of thermodynamics?
Where is the “conservation” in the first law of thermodynamics?
first law of thermodynamics and conservation of energyHow to use the first law of thermodynamics for simple mechanical systems?first law of thermodynamics and conservation of energyThermodynamics problemWhy doesn't the adiabatic reduction of first law of thermodynamics, $W = -Delta U,$ hold for non-conservative forces?First law of thermodynamics, internal energyInternal energy in first law of thermodynamicsIs the first law of thermodynamics (conservation of energy) also applicable to power?Confusion on a phrasing of the First Law of ThermodynamicsWhat is the difference between first law of thermodynamics and Kelvin-Planck statement?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
I am learning the basics of Thermodynamics.
Everywhere I read about the first law, it states "conservation of energy", and talks about how internal energy equals heat and work transfer.
I am aware of work transfer being considered positive and negative depending on the point of view we want to set.
That is okay.
But it confuses me to see the word "conservation".
If we take a very simple or at least very common real process like putting a plastic bottle completely filled with liquid water into a freezer (or whatever environment that is constantly under 273 K) and wait for thermal equilibrium to happen, the bottle will have expanded because water will have frozen increasing its volume and pushing the bottle's limits.
In this case:
The system (the bottle) has lost or given away a whatever amount of heat and it will also have generated a work transfer (to make the bottle expand).
It doesn't matter if we consider that work positive once or negative twice, in both cases energy has left the system in the form of work.
The total amount of internal energy of the system has clearly decreased.
So apparently there isn't really any "conservation" happening.
I do not intend to hate on thermodynamics, it's actually beautiful, I just want to understand the semantics.
I read other similar questions like this one, but in none did I find a clear answer.
thermodynamics energy-conservation
edited 3 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
112k13 gold badges219 silver badges1334 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Alvaro FranzAlvaro Franz
347 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am learning the basics of Thermodynamics.
Everywhere I read about the first law, it states "conservation of energy", and talks about how internal energy equals heat and work transfer.
I am aware of work transfer being considered positive and negative depending on the point of view we want to set.
That is okay.
But it confuses me to see the word "conservation".
If we take a very simple or at least very common real process like putting a plastic bottle completely filled with liquid water into a freezer (or whatever environment that is constantly under 273 K) and wait for thermal equilibrium to happen, the bottle will have expanded because water will have frozen increasing its volume and pushing the bottle's limits.
In this case:
The system (the bottle) has lost or given away a whatever amount of heat and it will also have generated a work transfer (to make the bottle expand).
It doesn't matter if we consider that work positive once or negative twice, in both cases energy has left the system in the form of work.
The total amount of internal energy of the system has clearly decreased.
So apparently there isn't really any "conservation" happening.
I do not intend to hate on thermodynamics, it's actually beautiful, I just want to understand the semantics.
I read other similar questions like this one, but in none did I find a clear answer.
thermodynamics energy-conservation
edited 3 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
112k13 gold badges219 silver badges1334 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Alvaro FranzAlvaro Franz
347 bronze badges
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
It's conservation of total energy, not just the system's energy.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
In your example, the system would have to be the bottle AND the freezer, and the conservation of energy would imply that whatever heat was lost by the bottle must have been absorbed by the freezer. In general you want to consider closed systems, i.e. systems which do not interact with the environment (as the bottle taken alone is doing with the freezer).
$endgroup$
– Jxx
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"conservation of energy", and talks about how internal energy equals heat and work transfer. This is wrong. It should be change in internal energy.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This is an input - output = accumulation kind of thing. It's like a bank account, for which "conservation of money" exists. Deposits - Payments (checks) = change in bank balance. If money was disappearing, the FEDs would have to come in and arrest someone. In the first law, the change in internal energy is analogous to the change in bank balance. Heat added minus work done is analogous to deposits minus payments (although unlike a bank account, heat added and work done can both be positive or negative).
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am learning the basics of Thermodynamics.
Everywhere I read about the first law, it states "conservation of energy", and talks about how internal energy equals heat and work transfer.
I am aware of work transfer being considered positive and negative depending on the point of view we want to set.
That is okay.
But it confuses me to see the word "conservation".
If we take a very simple or at least very common real process like putting a plastic bottle completely filled with liquid water into a freezer (or whatever environment that is constantly under 273 K) and wait for thermal equilibrium to happen, the bottle will have expanded because water will have frozen increasing its volume and pushing the bottle's limits.
In this case:
The system (the bottle) has lost or given away a whatever amount of heat and it will also have generated a work transfer (to make the bottle expand).
It doesn't matter if we consider that work positive once or negative twice, in both cases energy has left the system in the form of work.
The total amount of internal energy of the system has clearly decreased.
So apparently there isn't really any "conservation" happening.
I do not intend to hate on thermodynamics, it's actually beautiful, I just want to understand the semantics.
I read other similar questions like this one, but in none did I find a clear answer.
thermodynamics energy-conservation
edited 3 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
112k13 gold badges219 silver badges1334 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Alvaro FranzAlvaro Franz
347 bronze badges
$endgroup$
I am learning the basics of Thermodynamics.
Everywhere I read about the first law, it states "conservation of energy", and talks about how internal energy equals heat and work transfer.
I am aware of work transfer being considered positive and negative depending on the point of view we want to set.
That is okay.
But it confuses me to see the word "conservation".
If we take a very simple or at least very common real process like putting a plastic bottle completely filled with liquid water into a freezer (or whatever environment that is constantly under 273 K) and wait for thermal equilibrium to happen, the bottle will have expanded because water will have frozen increasing its volume and pushing the bottle's limits.
In this case:
The system (the bottle) has lost or given away a whatever amount of heat and it will also have generated a work transfer (to make the bottle expand).
It doesn't matter if we consider that work positive once or negative twice, in both cases energy has left the system in the form of work.
The total amount of internal energy of the system has clearly decreased.
So apparently there isn't really any "conservation" happening.
I do not intend to hate on thermodynamics, it's actually beautiful, I just want to understand the semantics.
I read other similar questions like this one, but in none did I find a clear answer.
thermodynamics energy-conservation
thermodynamics energy-conservation
edited 3 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
112k13 gold badges219 silver badges1334 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Alvaro FranzAlvaro Franz
347 bronze badges
edited 3 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
112k13 gold badges219 silver badges1334 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Alvaro FranzAlvaro Franz
347 bronze badges
edited 3 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
112k13 gold badges219 silver badges1334 bronze badges
edited 3 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
112k13 gold badges219 silver badges1334 bronze badges
edited 3 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
112k13 gold badges219 silver badges1334 bronze badges
112k13 gold badges219 silver badges1334 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Alvaro FranzAlvaro Franz
347 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Alvaro FranzAlvaro Franz
347 bronze badges
asked 8 hours ago
Alvaro FranzAlvaro Franz
347 bronze badges
347 bronze badges
2
$begingroup$
It's conservation of total energy, not just the system's energy.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
In your example, the system would have to be the bottle AND the freezer, and the conservation of energy would imply that whatever heat was lost by the bottle must have been absorbed by the freezer. In general you want to consider closed systems, i.e. systems which do not interact with the environment (as the bottle taken alone is doing with the freezer).
$endgroup$
– Jxx
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"conservation of energy", and talks about how internal energy equals heat and work transfer. This is wrong. It should be change in internal energy.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This is an input - output = accumulation kind of thing. It's like a bank account, for which "conservation of money" exists. Deposits - Payments (checks) = change in bank balance. If money was disappearing, the FEDs would have to come in and arrest someone. In the first law, the change in internal energy is analogous to the change in bank balance. Heat added minus work done is analogous to deposits minus payments (although unlike a bank account, heat added and work done can both be positive or negative).
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
It's conservation of total energy, not just the system's energy.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
In your example, the system would have to be the bottle AND the freezer, and the conservation of energy would imply that whatever heat was lost by the bottle must have been absorbed by the freezer. In general you want to consider closed systems, i.e. systems which do not interact with the environment (as the bottle taken alone is doing with the freezer).
$endgroup$
– Jxx
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"conservation of energy", and talks about how internal energy equals heat and work transfer. This is wrong. It should be change in internal energy.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This is an input - output = accumulation kind of thing. It's like a bank account, for which "conservation of money" exists. Deposits - Payments (checks) = change in bank balance. If money was disappearing, the FEDs would have to come in and arrest someone. In the first law, the change in internal energy is analogous to the change in bank balance. Heat added minus work done is analogous to deposits minus payments (although unlike a bank account, heat added and work done can both be positive or negative).
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
It's conservation of total energy, not just the system's energy.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
It's conservation of total energy, not just the system's energy.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
In your example, the system would have to be the bottle AND the freezer, and the conservation of energy would imply that whatever heat was lost by the bottle must have been absorbed by the freezer. In general you want to consider closed systems, i.e. systems which do not interact with the environment (as the bottle taken alone is doing with the freezer).
$endgroup$
– Jxx
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
In your example, the system would have to be the bottle AND the freezer, and the conservation of energy would imply that whatever heat was lost by the bottle must have been absorbed by the freezer. In general you want to consider closed systems, i.e. systems which do not interact with the environment (as the bottle taken alone is doing with the freezer).
$endgroup$
– Jxx
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"conservation of energy", and talks about how internal energy equals heat and work transfer. This is wrong. It should be change in internal energy.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
"conservation of energy", and talks about how internal energy equals heat and work transfer. This is wrong. It should be change in internal energy.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
This is an input - output = accumulation kind of thing. It's like a bank account, for which "conservation of money" exists. Deposits - Payments (checks) = change in bank balance. If money was disappearing, the FEDs would have to come in and arrest someone. In the first law, the change in internal energy is analogous to the change in bank balance. Heat added minus work done is analogous to deposits minus payments (although unlike a bank account, heat added and work done can both be positive or negative).
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is an input - output = accumulation kind of thing. It's like a bank account, for which "conservation of money" exists. Deposits - Payments (checks) = change in bank balance. If money was disappearing, the FEDs would have to come in and arrest someone. In the first law, the change in internal energy is analogous to the change in bank balance. Heat added minus work done is analogous to deposits minus payments (although unlike a bank account, heat added and work done can both be positive or negative).
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm not sure why people are saying this only applies to closed systems. This law actually applies to all systems. The first law is conservation of energy. It says the change in energy is equal to the energy that enters/leaves it in the form of work or heat. i.e.
$$Delta U=W+Q$$
where $U$ is the internal energy, $W$ is the work done on the system, and $Q$ is the heat that enters the system. This equation essentially just says we can track where the energy of our system is coming from/going to. It isn't suddenly appearing from or disappearing to some "unknown nowhere". It's energy conservation.
In your system, heat left the system, and the system did some work on the environment I suppose (though this might be negligible). In any case, $Q<0$ and $W<0$, so it should be no surprise that $Delta U<0$. Energy has left your system (and has gone somewhere else), so the internal energy has decreased. Energy conservation is true, and it's present in the first law here.
answered 7 hours ago
Aaron StevensAaron Stevens
21.2k4 gold badges37 silver badges75 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In engineering, a closed system is one in which no mass enters of leaves, but one which can exchange of heat and work with the surroundings. What you are envisioning as a closed system is what we call an "isolated system."
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ChetMiller Ah ok, thanks. I have removed my parenthetical comment. In any case, the first law still applies to all systems.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The energy of the water in the bottle has definitely decreased, but it's not a closed system. The freezer pumps the heat out, which heats up the external environment.
answered 8 hours ago
Jeff BassJeff Bass
10510 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good answer, but I think you should highlight the "closed system" part. This law applies to closed systems only.
$endgroup$
– FGSUZ
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FGSUZ I don't think that's true
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
“Conserved” doesn’t mean “never changes”. It means “this stuff is real, and the only way you have less or more is if some is taken away or added”. You can then follow that additions or subtractions.
Since your cold bottle has less energy, the conservation law says that energy has not disappeared, it’s just gone somewhere. You can find it. You can figure out how it got there.
answered 1 hour ago
Bob JacobsenBob Jacobsen
7,41711 silver badges23 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f497904%2fwhere-is-the-conservation-in-the-first-law-of-thermodynamics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I'm not sure why people are saying this only applies to closed systems. This law actually applies to all systems. The first law is conservation of energy. It says the change in energy is equal to the energy that enters/leaves it in the form of work or heat. i.e.
$$Delta U=W+Q$$
where $U$ is the internal energy, $W$ is the work done on the system, and $Q$ is the heat that enters the system. This equation essentially just says we can track where the energy of our system is coming from/going to. It isn't suddenly appearing from or disappearing to some "unknown nowhere". It's energy conservation.
In your system, heat left the system, and the system did some work on the environment I suppose (though this might be negligible). In any case, $Q<0$ and $W<0$, so it should be no surprise that $Delta U<0$. Energy has left your system (and has gone somewhere else), so the internal energy has decreased. Energy conservation is true, and it's present in the first law here.
answered 7 hours ago
Aaron StevensAaron Stevens
21.2k4 gold badges37 silver badges75 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In engineering, a closed system is one in which no mass enters of leaves, but one which can exchange of heat and work with the surroundings. What you are envisioning as a closed system is what we call an "isolated system."
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ChetMiller Ah ok, thanks. I have removed my parenthetical comment. In any case, the first law still applies to all systems.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not sure why people are saying this only applies to closed systems. This law actually applies to all systems. The first law is conservation of energy. It says the change in energy is equal to the energy that enters/leaves it in the form of work or heat. i.e.
$$Delta U=W+Q$$
where $U$ is the internal energy, $W$ is the work done on the system, and $Q$ is the heat that enters the system. This equation essentially just says we can track where the energy of our system is coming from/going to. It isn't suddenly appearing from or disappearing to some "unknown nowhere". It's energy conservation.
In your system, heat left the system, and the system did some work on the environment I suppose (though this might be negligible). In any case, $Q<0$ and $W<0$, so it should be no surprise that $Delta U<0$. Energy has left your system (and has gone somewhere else), so the internal energy has decreased. Energy conservation is true, and it's present in the first law here.
answered 7 hours ago
Aaron StevensAaron Stevens
21.2k4 gold badges37 silver badges75 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
In engineering, a closed system is one in which no mass enters of leaves, but one which can exchange of heat and work with the surroundings. What you are envisioning as a closed system is what we call an "isolated system."
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ChetMiller Ah ok, thanks. I have removed my parenthetical comment. In any case, the first law still applies to all systems.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm not sure why people are saying this only applies to closed systems. This law actually applies to all systems. The first law is conservation of energy. It says the change in energy is equal to the energy that enters/leaves it in the form of work or heat. i.e.
$$Delta U=W+Q$$
where $U$ is the internal energy, $W$ is the work done on the system, and $Q$ is the heat that enters the system. This equation essentially just says we can track where the energy of our system is coming from/going to. It isn't suddenly appearing from or disappearing to some "unknown nowhere". It's energy conservation.
In your system, heat left the system, and the system did some work on the environment I suppose (though this might be negligible). In any case, $Q<0$ and $W<0$, so it should be no surprise that $Delta U<0$. Energy has left your system (and has gone somewhere else), so the internal energy has decreased. Energy conservation is true, and it's present in the first law here.
answered 7 hours ago
Aaron StevensAaron Stevens
21.2k4 gold badges37 silver badges75 bronze badges
$endgroup$
I'm not sure why people are saying this only applies to closed systems. This law actually applies to all systems. The first law is conservation of energy. It says the change in energy is equal to the energy that enters/leaves it in the form of work or heat. i.e.
$$Delta U=W+Q$$
where $U$ is the internal energy, $W$ is the work done on the system, and $Q$ is the heat that enters the system. This equation essentially just says we can track where the energy of our system is coming from/going to. It isn't suddenly appearing from or disappearing to some "unknown nowhere". It's energy conservation.
In your system, heat left the system, and the system did some work on the environment I suppose (though this might be negligible). In any case, $Q<0$ and $W<0$, so it should be no surprise that $Delta U<0$. Energy has left your system (and has gone somewhere else), so the internal energy has decreased. Energy conservation is true, and it's present in the first law here.
answered 7 hours ago
Aaron StevensAaron Stevens
21.2k4 gold badges37 silver badges75 bronze badges
edited 6 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
Aaron StevensAaron Stevens
21.2k4 gold badges37 silver badges75 bronze badges
answered 7 hours ago
Aaron StevensAaron Stevens
21.2k4 gold badges37 silver badges75 bronze badges
answered 7 hours ago
Aaron StevensAaron Stevens
21.2k4 gold badges37 silver badges75 bronze badges
21.2k4 gold badges37 silver badges75 bronze badges
$begingroup$
In engineering, a closed system is one in which no mass enters of leaves, but one which can exchange of heat and work with the surroundings. What you are envisioning as a closed system is what we call an "isolated system."
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ChetMiller Ah ok, thanks. I have removed my parenthetical comment. In any case, the first law still applies to all systems.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In engineering, a closed system is one in which no mass enters of leaves, but one which can exchange of heat and work with the surroundings. What you are envisioning as a closed system is what we call an "isolated system."
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ChetMiller Ah ok, thanks. I have removed my parenthetical comment. In any case, the first law still applies to all systems.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
In engineering, a closed system is one in which no mass enters of leaves, but one which can exchange of heat and work with the surroundings. What you are envisioning as a closed system is what we call an "isolated system."
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
In engineering, a closed system is one in which no mass enters of leaves, but one which can exchange of heat and work with the surroundings. What you are envisioning as a closed system is what we call an "isolated system."
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ChetMiller Ah ok, thanks. I have removed my parenthetical comment. In any case, the first law still applies to all systems.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ChetMiller Ah ok, thanks. I have removed my parenthetical comment. In any case, the first law still applies to all systems.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The energy of the water in the bottle has definitely decreased, but it's not a closed system. The freezer pumps the heat out, which heats up the external environment.
answered 8 hours ago
Jeff BassJeff Bass
10510 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good answer, but I think you should highlight the "closed system" part. This law applies to closed systems only.
$endgroup$
– FGSUZ
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FGSUZ I don't think that's true
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The energy of the water in the bottle has definitely decreased, but it's not a closed system. The freezer pumps the heat out, which heats up the external environment.
answered 8 hours ago
Jeff BassJeff Bass
10510 bronze badges
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Good answer, but I think you should highlight the "closed system" part. This law applies to closed systems only.
$endgroup$
– FGSUZ
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FGSUZ I don't think that's true
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The energy of the water in the bottle has definitely decreased, but it's not a closed system. The freezer pumps the heat out, which heats up the external environment.
answered 8 hours ago
Jeff BassJeff Bass
10510 bronze badges
$endgroup$
The energy of the water in the bottle has definitely decreased, but it's not a closed system. The freezer pumps the heat out, which heats up the external environment.
answered 8 hours ago
Jeff BassJeff Bass
10510 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
Jeff BassJeff Bass
10510 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
Jeff BassJeff Bass
10510 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
Jeff BassJeff Bass
10510 bronze badges
10510 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Good answer, but I think you should highlight the "closed system" part. This law applies to closed systems only.
$endgroup$
– FGSUZ
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FGSUZ I don't think that's true
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Good answer, but I think you should highlight the "closed system" part. This law applies to closed systems only.
$endgroup$
– FGSUZ
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FGSUZ I don't think that's true
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good answer, but I think you should highlight the "closed system" part. This law applies to closed systems only.
$endgroup$
– FGSUZ
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Good answer, but I think you should highlight the "closed system" part. This law applies to closed systems only.
$endgroup$
– FGSUZ
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FGSUZ I don't think that's true
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@FGSUZ I don't think that's true
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
6 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
“Conserved” doesn’t mean “never changes”. It means “this stuff is real, and the only way you have less or more is if some is taken away or added”. You can then follow that additions or subtractions.
Since your cold bottle has less energy, the conservation law says that energy has not disappeared, it’s just gone somewhere. You can find it. You can figure out how it got there.
answered 1 hour ago
Bob JacobsenBob Jacobsen
7,41711 silver badges23 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
“Conserved” doesn’t mean “never changes”. It means “this stuff is real, and the only way you have less or more is if some is taken away or added”. You can then follow that additions or subtractions.
Since your cold bottle has less energy, the conservation law says that energy has not disappeared, it’s just gone somewhere. You can find it. You can figure out how it got there.
answered 1 hour ago
Bob JacobsenBob Jacobsen
7,41711 silver badges23 bronze badges
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
“Conserved” doesn’t mean “never changes”. It means “this stuff is real, and the only way you have less or more is if some is taken away or added”. You can then follow that additions or subtractions.
Since your cold bottle has less energy, the conservation law says that energy has not disappeared, it’s just gone somewhere. You can find it. You can figure out how it got there.
answered 1 hour ago
Bob JacobsenBob Jacobsen
7,41711 silver badges23 bronze badges
$endgroup$
“Conserved” doesn’t mean “never changes”. It means “this stuff is real, and the only way you have less or more is if some is taken away or added”. You can then follow that additions or subtractions.
Since your cold bottle has less energy, the conservation law says that energy has not disappeared, it’s just gone somewhere. You can find it. You can figure out how it got there.
answered 1 hour ago
Bob JacobsenBob Jacobsen
7,41711 silver badges23 bronze badges
answered 1 hour ago
Bob JacobsenBob Jacobsen
7,41711 silver badges23 bronze badges
answered 1 hour ago
Bob JacobsenBob Jacobsen
7,41711 silver badges23 bronze badges
answered 1 hour ago
Bob JacobsenBob Jacobsen
7,41711 silver badges23 bronze badges
7,41711 silver badges23 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f497904%2fwhere-is-the-conservation-in-the-first-law-of-thermodynamics%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
It's conservation of total energy, not just the system's energy.
$endgroup$
– knzhou
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
In your example, the system would have to be the bottle AND the freezer, and the conservation of energy would imply that whatever heat was lost by the bottle must have been absorbed by the freezer. In general you want to consider closed systems, i.e. systems which do not interact with the environment (as the bottle taken alone is doing with the freezer).
$endgroup$
– Jxx
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
"conservation of energy", and talks about how internal energy equals heat and work transfer. This is wrong. It should be change in internal energy.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
7 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
This is an input - output = accumulation kind of thing. It's like a bank account, for which "conservation of money" exists. Deposits - Payments (checks) = change in bank balance. If money was disappearing, the FEDs would have to come in and arrest someone. In the first law, the change in internal energy is analogous to the change in bank balance. Heat added minus work done is analogous to deposits minus payments (although unlike a bank account, heat added and work done can both be positive or negative).
$endgroup$
– Chet Miller
7 hours ago