Prove your innocenceA double-agent with a conundrumMurderer, Car and ColourSeeking SidekicksThe harsh password changeFind your way to the control roomA Prison Officer's PasswordBirdies and Tigers and Bears, Oh My!What do chess and wordoku have to do with each other? - Clue Thirty-OneThe Evicted TenantDo I Work with an Orangutan?A strange hotel

Why is Boris Johnson visiting only Paris & Berlin if every member of the EU needs to agree on a withdrawal deal?

Did it used to be possible to target a zone?

Can I double-dip a flight and claim it for both United and Lufthansa status miles?

Mathematical uses of string theory

Photoshop CS6 - Remove glare/hue from image

Was there ever a treaty between 2 entities with significantly different translations to the detriment of one party?

Sun setting in East!

C++20 constexpr std::copy optimizations for run-time

Is “I am getting married with my sister” ambiguous?

Is "The life is beautiful" incorrect or just very non-idiomatic?

Is a player able to change alignment midway through an adventure?

Justifying the use of directed energy weapons

Singleton Design Pattern implementation in a not traditional way

How do applicants for an NSF fellowship come up with a research plan for the research statement part of the applications

How to use "Du hast/ Du hattest'?

Why did this happen to Thanos's ships at the end of "Avengers: Endgame"?

Can realistic planetary invasion have any meaningful strategy?

Why is my Earth simulation slower than the reality?

Why in most German places is the church the tallest building?

What magic extends life or grants immortality?

Can you feel passing through the sound barrier in an F-16?

What are some interesting features that are common cross-linguistically but don't exist in English?

What to say to a student who has failed?

Can pay be witheld for hours cleaning up after closing time?



Prove your innocence


A double-agent with a conundrumMurderer, Car and ColourSeeking SidekicksThe harsh password changeFind your way to the control roomA Prison Officer's PasswordBirdies and Tigers and Bears, Oh My!What do chess and wordoku have to do with each other? - Clue Thirty-OneThe Evicted TenantDo I Work with an Orangutan?A strange hotel






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








6












$begingroup$


Inspired by A double-agent with a conundrum. Everything is hypothetical and while the choice of countries are important, they serve no political purpose.



Tension between the US and China is rising. You are a senior officer working for the CIA, in charge of protecting secret technology from the hands of Chinese spies. You also appear in public often, making you the target of many hostile groups.



One day, there appeared a video, showing you conversing and divulging classified information to China's intelligence counterpart. Espionage, if charged, means maximum security prison for life. The problem? That was not you. You believed that the Chinese government hired a body double and faked the video from mainland China to frame you into espionage. You have to prove your innocence before it's too late, because the system will err on the side of guilt except there exist a "smoking gun" evidence.



You scrutinized the video. It started with the title "CIA senior officer at a secret meeting in Denver, August 2nd 2019." The video then cut to a likeness of you, sitting opposite a desk from two other Chinese senior ranking officers. The video seems to be captured by a hidden high quality camera. The faces were blurred in the video, but the voice sounded exactly like yours. The room was white, illuminated by bright florescence light. Besides the desk, chairs, and a clock on the wall, the room was bare. Nothing about the furniture could have told you anything about their origin. Your likeness was able to capture you quite well, copy your very mannerism and accent. He must have watched a lot of your interviews. He even wore everything that you have, down to the wrist watch. You know that everything talked about in the video are true, but the Chinese could have known that already from previous espionage attempts. The metadata was stripped bare, and no one knows who tipped the video in the first place. You also cannot unblur the face to show that it is actually not you.



Suddenly, you had an idea. You went back to your computer and used one last forensics trick...Bingo! The Chinese might tried very hard in hiding anything that revealed the video's actual location, but this showed that the video is recorded in China and not in America! Coupled with the fact that you never left America, you have found the smoking gun for you innocence!




What is your evidence?











share|improve this question









$endgroup$




















    6












    $begingroup$


    Inspired by A double-agent with a conundrum. Everything is hypothetical and while the choice of countries are important, they serve no political purpose.



    Tension between the US and China is rising. You are a senior officer working for the CIA, in charge of protecting secret technology from the hands of Chinese spies. You also appear in public often, making you the target of many hostile groups.



    One day, there appeared a video, showing you conversing and divulging classified information to China's intelligence counterpart. Espionage, if charged, means maximum security prison for life. The problem? That was not you. You believed that the Chinese government hired a body double and faked the video from mainland China to frame you into espionage. You have to prove your innocence before it's too late, because the system will err on the side of guilt except there exist a "smoking gun" evidence.



    You scrutinized the video. It started with the title "CIA senior officer at a secret meeting in Denver, August 2nd 2019." The video then cut to a likeness of you, sitting opposite a desk from two other Chinese senior ranking officers. The video seems to be captured by a hidden high quality camera. The faces were blurred in the video, but the voice sounded exactly like yours. The room was white, illuminated by bright florescence light. Besides the desk, chairs, and a clock on the wall, the room was bare. Nothing about the furniture could have told you anything about their origin. Your likeness was able to capture you quite well, copy your very mannerism and accent. He must have watched a lot of your interviews. He even wore everything that you have, down to the wrist watch. You know that everything talked about in the video are true, but the Chinese could have known that already from previous espionage attempts. The metadata was stripped bare, and no one knows who tipped the video in the first place. You also cannot unblur the face to show that it is actually not you.



    Suddenly, you had an idea. You went back to your computer and used one last forensics trick...Bingo! The Chinese might tried very hard in hiding anything that revealed the video's actual location, but this showed that the video is recorded in China and not in America! Coupled with the fact that you never left America, you have found the smoking gun for you innocence!




    What is your evidence?











    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$
















      6












      6








      6


      1



      $begingroup$


      Inspired by A double-agent with a conundrum. Everything is hypothetical and while the choice of countries are important, they serve no political purpose.



      Tension between the US and China is rising. You are a senior officer working for the CIA, in charge of protecting secret technology from the hands of Chinese spies. You also appear in public often, making you the target of many hostile groups.



      One day, there appeared a video, showing you conversing and divulging classified information to China's intelligence counterpart. Espionage, if charged, means maximum security prison for life. The problem? That was not you. You believed that the Chinese government hired a body double and faked the video from mainland China to frame you into espionage. You have to prove your innocence before it's too late, because the system will err on the side of guilt except there exist a "smoking gun" evidence.



      You scrutinized the video. It started with the title "CIA senior officer at a secret meeting in Denver, August 2nd 2019." The video then cut to a likeness of you, sitting opposite a desk from two other Chinese senior ranking officers. The video seems to be captured by a hidden high quality camera. The faces were blurred in the video, but the voice sounded exactly like yours. The room was white, illuminated by bright florescence light. Besides the desk, chairs, and a clock on the wall, the room was bare. Nothing about the furniture could have told you anything about their origin. Your likeness was able to capture you quite well, copy your very mannerism and accent. He must have watched a lot of your interviews. He even wore everything that you have, down to the wrist watch. You know that everything talked about in the video are true, but the Chinese could have known that already from previous espionage attempts. The metadata was stripped bare, and no one knows who tipped the video in the first place. You also cannot unblur the face to show that it is actually not you.



      Suddenly, you had an idea. You went back to your computer and used one last forensics trick...Bingo! The Chinese might tried very hard in hiding anything that revealed the video's actual location, but this showed that the video is recorded in China and not in America! Coupled with the fact that you never left America, you have found the smoking gun for you innocence!




      What is your evidence?











      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      Inspired by A double-agent with a conundrum. Everything is hypothetical and while the choice of countries are important, they serve no political purpose.



      Tension between the US and China is rising. You are a senior officer working for the CIA, in charge of protecting secret technology from the hands of Chinese spies. You also appear in public often, making you the target of many hostile groups.



      One day, there appeared a video, showing you conversing and divulging classified information to China's intelligence counterpart. Espionage, if charged, means maximum security prison for life. The problem? That was not you. You believed that the Chinese government hired a body double and faked the video from mainland China to frame you into espionage. You have to prove your innocence before it's too late, because the system will err on the side of guilt except there exist a "smoking gun" evidence.



      You scrutinized the video. It started with the title "CIA senior officer at a secret meeting in Denver, August 2nd 2019." The video then cut to a likeness of you, sitting opposite a desk from two other Chinese senior ranking officers. The video seems to be captured by a hidden high quality camera. The faces were blurred in the video, but the voice sounded exactly like yours. The room was white, illuminated by bright florescence light. Besides the desk, chairs, and a clock on the wall, the room was bare. Nothing about the furniture could have told you anything about their origin. Your likeness was able to capture you quite well, copy your very mannerism and accent. He must have watched a lot of your interviews. He even wore everything that you have, down to the wrist watch. You know that everything talked about in the video are true, but the Chinese could have known that already from previous espionage attempts. The metadata was stripped bare, and no one knows who tipped the video in the first place. You also cannot unblur the face to show that it is actually not you.



      Suddenly, you had an idea. You went back to your computer and used one last forensics trick...Bingo! The Chinese might tried very hard in hiding anything that revealed the video's actual location, but this showed that the video is recorded in China and not in America! Coupled with the fact that you never left America, you have found the smoking gun for you innocence!




      What is your evidence?








      knowledge story






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      Minh TranMinh Tran

      1,6051 gold badge7 silver badges33 bronze badges




      1,6051 gold badge7 silver badges33 bronze badges























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          13













          $begingroup$

          I don't think there's anything in the story that shows that the (fictional) Chinese didn't fake this right, but here's a thing that seems like it might be easy to get wrong and possible to detect:




          The US uses 60Hz electrity and China uses 50Hz electricity, which will produce different speeds of lighting flicker from those fluorescent lights (a kind of lighting that is consistently very flickery). If the lighting flicker rate matches the video's frame rate, then there will be either no visible artefacts or there will be more or less static variation in brightness across the image as a result. If it mismatches substantially, then successive frames will either vary in overall brightness or vary in spatial brightness variation, depending on the details of the camera. Either way, if we know the video's frame rate then we should be able to tell whether the lighting is powered by 50Hz or 60Hz electricity.




          Some caveats:




          It is possible to reprocess video to change its frame rate. It is possible to rig up your own electricity generation so as to produce electricity at a frequency different from what the mains gives you.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
            $endgroup$
            – Arnaud Mortier
            7 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "559"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87302%2fprove-your-innocence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          13













          $begingroup$

          I don't think there's anything in the story that shows that the (fictional) Chinese didn't fake this right, but here's a thing that seems like it might be easy to get wrong and possible to detect:




          The US uses 60Hz electrity and China uses 50Hz electricity, which will produce different speeds of lighting flicker from those fluorescent lights (a kind of lighting that is consistently very flickery). If the lighting flicker rate matches the video's frame rate, then there will be either no visible artefacts or there will be more or less static variation in brightness across the image as a result. If it mismatches substantially, then successive frames will either vary in overall brightness or vary in spatial brightness variation, depending on the details of the camera. Either way, if we know the video's frame rate then we should be able to tell whether the lighting is powered by 50Hz or 60Hz electricity.




          Some caveats:




          It is possible to reprocess video to change its frame rate. It is possible to rig up your own electricity generation so as to produce electricity at a frequency different from what the mains gives you.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
            $endgroup$
            – Arnaud Mortier
            7 hours ago















          13













          $begingroup$

          I don't think there's anything in the story that shows that the (fictional) Chinese didn't fake this right, but here's a thing that seems like it might be easy to get wrong and possible to detect:




          The US uses 60Hz electrity and China uses 50Hz electricity, which will produce different speeds of lighting flicker from those fluorescent lights (a kind of lighting that is consistently very flickery). If the lighting flicker rate matches the video's frame rate, then there will be either no visible artefacts or there will be more or less static variation in brightness across the image as a result. If it mismatches substantially, then successive frames will either vary in overall brightness or vary in spatial brightness variation, depending on the details of the camera. Either way, if we know the video's frame rate then we should be able to tell whether the lighting is powered by 50Hz or 60Hz electricity.




          Some caveats:




          It is possible to reprocess video to change its frame rate. It is possible to rig up your own electricity generation so as to produce electricity at a frequency different from what the mains gives you.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$










          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
            $endgroup$
            – Arnaud Mortier
            7 hours ago













          13














          13










          13







          $begingroup$

          I don't think there's anything in the story that shows that the (fictional) Chinese didn't fake this right, but here's a thing that seems like it might be easy to get wrong and possible to detect:




          The US uses 60Hz electrity and China uses 50Hz electricity, which will produce different speeds of lighting flicker from those fluorescent lights (a kind of lighting that is consistently very flickery). If the lighting flicker rate matches the video's frame rate, then there will be either no visible artefacts or there will be more or less static variation in brightness across the image as a result. If it mismatches substantially, then successive frames will either vary in overall brightness or vary in spatial brightness variation, depending on the details of the camera. Either way, if we know the video's frame rate then we should be able to tell whether the lighting is powered by 50Hz or 60Hz electricity.




          Some caveats:




          It is possible to reprocess video to change its frame rate. It is possible to rig up your own electricity generation so as to produce electricity at a frequency different from what the mains gives you.







          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          I don't think there's anything in the story that shows that the (fictional) Chinese didn't fake this right, but here's a thing that seems like it might be easy to get wrong and possible to detect:




          The US uses 60Hz electrity and China uses 50Hz electricity, which will produce different speeds of lighting flicker from those fluorescent lights (a kind of lighting that is consistently very flickery). If the lighting flicker rate matches the video's frame rate, then there will be either no visible artefacts or there will be more or less static variation in brightness across the image as a result. If it mismatches substantially, then successive frames will either vary in overall brightness or vary in spatial brightness variation, depending on the details of the camera. Either way, if we know the video's frame rate then we should be able to tell whether the lighting is powered by 50Hz or 60Hz electricity.




          Some caveats:




          It is possible to reprocess video to change its frame rate. It is possible to rig up your own electricity generation so as to produce electricity at a frequency different from what the mains gives you.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 7 hours ago









          Gareth McCaughanGareth McCaughan

          79.4k3 gold badges201 silver badges307 bronze badges




          79.4k3 gold badges201 silver badges307 bronze badges










          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
            $endgroup$
            – Arnaud Mortier
            7 hours ago












          • 2




            $begingroup$
            Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
            $endgroup$
            – Arnaud Mortier
            7 hours ago







          2




          2




          $begingroup$
          Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
          $endgroup$
          – Arnaud Mortier
          7 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Nice idea! I was thinking about what to make of the clock, but anything I could come up with was boring.
          $endgroup$
          – Arnaud Mortier
          7 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87302%2fprove-your-innocence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

          Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

          19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу