how to know this integral finite or infiniteEntropy of Cauchy (Lorentz) DistributionProof with probability inequalities and infinite sequencesHow to prove whether the mean of a probability density function existsConditional expectation student's t distributionProve that $ mathbbE[XY] - mathbbE[X] mathbbE[Y] = int_- infty^infty int_- infty^infty (F(x,y)-F_X(x) F_Y(y)) ,dx,dy,$How to calculate the mean of standard deviation when data are drawn from a Gaussian population?Variance of a random variable $X$ as a function of the survival function $S(x)$

Writing a system of Linear Equations

How to draw a Venn diagram for X - (Y intersect Z)?

What did the first ever Hunger Games look like?

Persuading players to be less attached to a pre-session 0 character concept

How often is duct tape used during crewed space missions?

Impossible Scrabble Words

Is my sink P-trap too low?

What is the origin of the "being immortal sucks" trope?

Are articles good enough to be the main source of information for PhD research?

Permutations in Disguise

Why does '/' contain '..'?

What does "boys rule, girls drool" mean?

In Bb5 systems against the Sicilian, why does White exchange their b5 bishop without playing a6?

Why would short-haul flights be pressurised at a higher cabin pressure?

How to generate short fixed length cryptographic hashes?

L and epsilon factors of Gelbart-Jacquet lifts

Is it safe to unplug a blinking USB drive after 'safely' ejecting it?

What is the difference between an engine skirt and an engine nozzle?

Updating without Composer

Can a business put whatever they want into a contract?

How to make classical firearms effective on space habitats despite the coriolis effect?

Why is belonging not transitive?

Are there any “Third Order” acronyms used in space exploration?

Statistical tests for benchmark comparison



how to know this integral finite or infinite


Entropy of Cauchy (Lorentz) DistributionProof with probability inequalities and infinite sequencesHow to prove whether the mean of a probability density function existsConditional expectation student's t distributionProve that $ mathbbE[XY] - mathbbE[X] mathbbE[Y] = int_- infty^infty int_- infty^infty (F(x,y)-F_X(x) F_Y(y)) ,dx,dy,$How to calculate the mean of standard deviation when data are drawn from a Gaussian population?Variance of a random variable $X$ as a function of the survival function $S(x)$






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


In here, i want to show this entropy exist or not exist, namely i
should calculate the integral of $int_0^cfrac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex,dx$. If the result is $ <infty$, we can say the entropy exists, otherwise it does not exist.
beginequation*
int_0^1f(x)log f(x),dx geq int_0^c frac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex , dx
endequation*
where $x in (0,c)$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
    $endgroup$
    – Martijn Weterings
    9 hours ago


















1












$begingroup$


In here, i want to show this entropy exist or not exist, namely i
should calculate the integral of $int_0^cfrac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex,dx$. If the result is $ <infty$, we can say the entropy exists, otherwise it does not exist.
beginequation*
int_0^1f(x)log f(x),dx geq int_0^c frac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex , dx
endequation*
where $x in (0,c)$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
    $endgroup$
    – Martijn Weterings
    9 hours ago














1












1








1





$begingroup$


In here, i want to show this entropy exist or not exist, namely i
should calculate the integral of $int_0^cfrac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex,dx$. If the result is $ <infty$, we can say the entropy exists, otherwise it does not exist.
beginequation*
int_0^1f(x)log f(x),dx geq int_0^c frac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex , dx
endequation*
where $x in (0,c)$










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




In here, i want to show this entropy exist or not exist, namely i
should calculate the integral of $int_0^cfrac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex,dx$. If the result is $ <infty$, we can say the entropy exists, otherwise it does not exist.
beginequation*
int_0^1f(x)log f(x),dx geq int_0^c frac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex , dx
endequation*
where $x in (0,c)$







mathematical-statistics entropy nonparametric-density






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









Michael Hardy

4,82415 silver badges31 bronze badges




4,82415 silver badges31 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









mhmtmhmt

133 bronze badges




133 bronze badges










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
    $endgroup$
    – Martijn Weterings
    9 hours ago













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
    $endgroup$
    – Martijn Weterings
    9 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
$int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
9 hours ago





$begingroup$
$int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
9 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














$begingroup$

$$int_0^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx $$



substitute $t=e/x$ (and use $dt/dx=-e/x^2$)



$$int_e/c^inftyfrace^2tlog tfrac12dt = log(log(t)) bigvert_e/c^infty$$



which diverges because $log(log(t))$ becomes infinite as $t to infty$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    2














    $begingroup$

    By u-substitution,



    beginaligned
    & int_0^c frac1xlog^2 fracex frac12 logfracex , dx
    = int_0^c frac12 left(logfracex right)^-1 frac1x dx \[8pt]
    & u=logfracex=1-log(x), qquad du=-fracdxx\[8pt]
    = & -frac12int u^-1 , du quad text(ignore limits for now) \[8pt]
    = & -frac12 log u \[8pt]
    = & left. -frac12 log(1-log x) right|_a^c, ~~ textin lim a rightarrow 0\[8pt]
    = & -frac12 lim_arightarrow 0 log(1-log c) -log(1-log a)
    endaligned

    And we see the limit doesn't exist. So, no, the entropy doesn't exist.



    And I see that Martijn Weterings beat me to the punch 12 minutes ago! OK, he had it first. :)






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$










    • 1




      $begingroup$
      I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
      $endgroup$
      – Martijn Weterings
      8 hours ago











    • $begingroup$
      @MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Leopold
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
      $endgroup$
      – mhmt
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael Hardy
      6 hours ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
      $endgroup$
      – Peter Leopold
      5 hours ago














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "65"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );














    draft saved

    draft discarded
















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f427352%2fhow-to-know-this-integral-finite-or-infinite%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    $begingroup$

    $$int_0^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx $$



    substitute $t=e/x$ (and use $dt/dx=-e/x^2$)



    $$int_e/c^inftyfrace^2tlog tfrac12dt = log(log(t)) bigvert_e/c^infty$$



    which diverges because $log(log(t))$ becomes infinite as $t to infty$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



















      2














      $begingroup$

      $$int_0^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx $$



      substitute $t=e/x$ (and use $dt/dx=-e/x^2$)



      $$int_e/c^inftyfrace^2tlog tfrac12dt = log(log(t)) bigvert_e/c^infty$$



      which diverges because $log(log(t))$ becomes infinite as $t to infty$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        2














        2










        2







        $begingroup$

        $$int_0^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx $$



        substitute $t=e/x$ (and use $dt/dx=-e/x^2$)



        $$int_e/c^inftyfrace^2tlog tfrac12dt = log(log(t)) bigvert_e/c^infty$$



        which diverges because $log(log(t))$ becomes infinite as $t to infty$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $$int_0^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx $$



        substitute $t=e/x$ (and use $dt/dx=-e/x^2$)



        $$int_e/c^inftyfrace^2tlog tfrac12dt = log(log(t)) bigvert_e/c^infty$$



        which diverges because $log(log(t))$ becomes infinite as $t to infty$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 8 hours ago









        Martijn WeteringsMartijn Weterings

        16k24 silver badges70 bronze badges




        16k24 silver badges70 bronze badges


























            2














            $begingroup$

            By u-substitution,



            beginaligned
            & int_0^c frac1xlog^2 fracex frac12 logfracex , dx
            = int_0^c frac12 left(logfracex right)^-1 frac1x dx \[8pt]
            & u=logfracex=1-log(x), qquad du=-fracdxx\[8pt]
            = & -frac12int u^-1 , du quad text(ignore limits for now) \[8pt]
            = & -frac12 log u \[8pt]
            = & left. -frac12 log(1-log x) right|_a^c, ~~ textin lim a rightarrow 0\[8pt]
            = & -frac12 lim_arightarrow 0 log(1-log c) -log(1-log a)
            endaligned

            And we see the limit doesn't exist. So, no, the entropy doesn't exist.



            And I see that Martijn Weterings beat me to the punch 12 minutes ago! OK, he had it first. :)






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$










            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
              $endgroup$
              – Martijn Weterings
              8 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Leopold
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
              $endgroup$
              – mhmt
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
              $endgroup$
              – Michael Hardy
              6 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Leopold
              5 hours ago
















            2














            $begingroup$

            By u-substitution,



            beginaligned
            & int_0^c frac1xlog^2 fracex frac12 logfracex , dx
            = int_0^c frac12 left(logfracex right)^-1 frac1x dx \[8pt]
            & u=logfracex=1-log(x), qquad du=-fracdxx\[8pt]
            = & -frac12int u^-1 , du quad text(ignore limits for now) \[8pt]
            = & -frac12 log u \[8pt]
            = & left. -frac12 log(1-log x) right|_a^c, ~~ textin lim a rightarrow 0\[8pt]
            = & -frac12 lim_arightarrow 0 log(1-log c) -log(1-log a)
            endaligned

            And we see the limit doesn't exist. So, no, the entropy doesn't exist.



            And I see that Martijn Weterings beat me to the punch 12 minutes ago! OK, he had it first. :)






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$










            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
              $endgroup$
              – Martijn Weterings
              8 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Leopold
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
              $endgroup$
              – mhmt
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
              $endgroup$
              – Michael Hardy
              6 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Leopold
              5 hours ago














            2














            2










            2







            $begingroup$

            By u-substitution,



            beginaligned
            & int_0^c frac1xlog^2 fracex frac12 logfracex , dx
            = int_0^c frac12 left(logfracex right)^-1 frac1x dx \[8pt]
            & u=logfracex=1-log(x), qquad du=-fracdxx\[8pt]
            = & -frac12int u^-1 , du quad text(ignore limits for now) \[8pt]
            = & -frac12 log u \[8pt]
            = & left. -frac12 log(1-log x) right|_a^c, ~~ textin lim a rightarrow 0\[8pt]
            = & -frac12 lim_arightarrow 0 log(1-log c) -log(1-log a)
            endaligned

            And we see the limit doesn't exist. So, no, the entropy doesn't exist.



            And I see that Martijn Weterings beat me to the punch 12 minutes ago! OK, he had it first. :)






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            By u-substitution,



            beginaligned
            & int_0^c frac1xlog^2 fracex frac12 logfracex , dx
            = int_0^c frac12 left(logfracex right)^-1 frac1x dx \[8pt]
            & u=logfracex=1-log(x), qquad du=-fracdxx\[8pt]
            = & -frac12int u^-1 , du quad text(ignore limits for now) \[8pt]
            = & -frac12 log u \[8pt]
            = & left. -frac12 log(1-log x) right|_a^c, ~~ textin lim a rightarrow 0\[8pt]
            = & -frac12 lim_arightarrow 0 log(1-log c) -log(1-log a)
            endaligned

            And we see the limit doesn't exist. So, no, the entropy doesn't exist.



            And I see that Martijn Weterings beat me to the punch 12 minutes ago! OK, he had it first. :)







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 6 hours ago









            Michael Hardy

            4,82415 silver badges31 bronze badges




            4,82415 silver badges31 bronze badges










            answered 8 hours ago









            Peter LeopoldPeter Leopold

            1,3343 silver badges18 bronze badges




            1,3343 silver badges18 bronze badges










            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
              $endgroup$
              – Martijn Weterings
              8 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Leopold
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
              $endgroup$
              – mhmt
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
              $endgroup$
              – Michael Hardy
              6 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Leopold
              5 hours ago













            • 1




              $begingroup$
              I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
              $endgroup$
              – Martijn Weterings
              8 hours ago











            • $begingroup$
              @MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Leopold
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
              $endgroup$
              – mhmt
              8 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
              $endgroup$
              – Michael Hardy
              6 hours ago






            • 1




              $begingroup$
              @MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
              $endgroup$
              – Peter Leopold
              5 hours ago








            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
            $endgroup$
            – Martijn Weterings
            8 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
            $endgroup$
            – Martijn Weterings
            8 hours ago













            $begingroup$
            @MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Leopold
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Leopold
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
            $endgroup$
            – mhmt
            8 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
            $endgroup$
            – mhmt
            8 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
            $endgroup$
            – Michael Hardy
            6 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
            $endgroup$
            – Michael Hardy
            6 hours ago




            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            @MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Leopold
            5 hours ago





            $begingroup$
            @MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
            $endgroup$
            – Peter Leopold
            5 hours ago



















            draft saved

            draft discarded















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f427352%2fhow-to-know-this-integral-finite-or-infinite%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Sahara Skak | Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: SaharaWikivoyage raisfeerer: Sahara26° N, 13° O

            The fall designs the understood secretary. Looking glass Science Shock Discovery Hot Everybody Loves Raymond Smile 곳 서비스 성실하다 Defas Kaloolon Definition: To combine or impregnate with sulphur or any of its compounds as to sulphurize caoutchouc in vulcanizing Flame colored Reason Useful Thin Help 갖다 유명하다 낙엽 장례식 Country Iron Definition: A fencer a gladiator one who exhibits his skill in the use of the sword Definition: The American black throated bunting Spiza Americana Nostalgic Needy Method to my madness 시키다 평가되다 전부 소설가 우아하다 Argument Tin Feeling Representative Gym Music Gaur Chicken 일쑤 코치 편 학생증 The harbor values the sugar. Vasagle Yammoe Enstatite Definition: Capable of being limited Road Neighborly Five Refer Built Kangaroo 비비다 Degree Release Bargain Horse 하루 형님 유교 석 동부 괴롭히다 경제력

            19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу