how to know this integral finite or infiniteEntropy of Cauchy (Lorentz) DistributionProof with probability inequalities and infinite sequencesHow to prove whether the mean of a probability density function existsConditional expectation student's t distributionProve that $ mathbbE[XY] - mathbbE[X] mathbbE[Y] = int_- infty^infty int_- infty^infty (F(x,y)-F_X(x) F_Y(y)) ,dx,dy,$How to calculate the mean of standard deviation when data are drawn from a Gaussian population?Variance of a random variable $X$ as a function of the survival function $S(x)$
Writing a system of Linear Equations
How to draw a Venn diagram for X - (Y intersect Z)?
What did the first ever Hunger Games look like?
Persuading players to be less attached to a pre-session 0 character concept
How often is duct tape used during crewed space missions?
Impossible Scrabble Words
Is my sink P-trap too low?
What is the origin of the "being immortal sucks" trope?
Are articles good enough to be the main source of information for PhD research?
Permutations in Disguise
Why does '/' contain '..'?
What does "boys rule, girls drool" mean?
In Bb5 systems against the Sicilian, why does White exchange their b5 bishop without playing a6?
Why would short-haul flights be pressurised at a higher cabin pressure?
How to generate short fixed length cryptographic hashes?
L and epsilon factors of Gelbart-Jacquet lifts
Is it safe to unplug a blinking USB drive after 'safely' ejecting it?
What is the difference between an engine skirt and an engine nozzle?
Updating without Composer
Can a business put whatever they want into a contract?
How to make classical firearms effective on space habitats despite the coriolis effect?
Why is belonging not transitive?
Are there any “Third Order” acronyms used in space exploration?
Statistical tests for benchmark comparison
how to know this integral finite or infinite
Entropy of Cauchy (Lorentz) DistributionProof with probability inequalities and infinite sequencesHow to prove whether the mean of a probability density function existsConditional expectation student's t distributionProve that $ mathbbE[XY] - mathbbE[X] mathbbE[Y] = int_- infty^infty int_- infty^infty (F(x,y)-F_X(x) F_Y(y)) ,dx,dy,$How to calculate the mean of standard deviation when data are drawn from a Gaussian population?Variance of a random variable $X$ as a function of the survival function $S(x)$
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
In here, i want to show this entropy exist or not exist, namely i
should calculate the integral of $int_0^cfrac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex,dx$. If the result is $ <infty$, we can say the entropy exists, otherwise it does not exist.
beginequation*
int_0^1f(x)log f(x),dx geq int_0^c frac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex , dx
endequation* where $x in (0,c)$
mathematical-statistics entropy nonparametric-density
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
In here, i want to show this entropy exist or not exist, namely i
should calculate the integral of $int_0^cfrac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex,dx$. If the result is $ <infty$, we can say the entropy exists, otherwise it does not exist.
beginequation*
int_0^1f(x)log f(x),dx geq int_0^c frac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex , dx
endequation* where $x in (0,c)$
mathematical-statistics entropy nonparametric-density
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
$int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
In here, i want to show this entropy exist or not exist, namely i
should calculate the integral of $int_0^cfrac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex,dx$. If the result is $ <infty$, we can say the entropy exists, otherwise it does not exist.
beginequation*
int_0^1f(x)log f(x),dx geq int_0^c frac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex , dx
endequation* where $x in (0,c)$
mathematical-statistics entropy nonparametric-density
$endgroup$
In here, i want to show this entropy exist or not exist, namely i
should calculate the integral of $int_0^cfrac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex,dx$. If the result is $ <infty$, we can say the entropy exists, otherwise it does not exist.
beginequation*
int_0^1f(x)log f(x),dx geq int_0^c frac1xlog^2fracexfrac12 logfracex , dx
endequation* where $x in (0,c)$
mathematical-statistics entropy nonparametric-density
mathematical-statistics entropy nonparametric-density
edited 6 hours ago
Michael Hardy
4,82415 silver badges31 bronze badges
4,82415 silver badges31 bronze badges
asked 9 hours ago
mhmtmhmt
133 bronze badges
133 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
$int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
$int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
9 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
$int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
9 hours ago
$begingroup$
$int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
9 hours ago
add a comment
|
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$int_0^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx $$
substitute $t=e/x$ (and use $dt/dx=-e/x^2$)
$$int_e/c^inftyfrace^2tlog tfrac12dt = log(log(t)) bigvert_e/c^infty$$
which diverges because $log(log(t))$ becomes infinite as $t to infty$
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
By u-substitution,
beginaligned
& int_0^c frac1xlog^2 fracex frac12 logfracex , dx
= int_0^c frac12 left(logfracex right)^-1 frac1x dx \[8pt]
& u=logfracex=1-log(x), qquad du=-fracdxx\[8pt]
= & -frac12int u^-1 , du quad text(ignore limits for now) \[8pt]
= & -frac12 log u \[8pt]
= & left. -frac12 log(1-log x) right|_a^c, ~~ textin lim a rightarrow 0\[8pt]
= & -frac12 lim_arightarrow 0 log(1-log c) -log(1-log a)
endaligned
And we see the limit doesn't exist. So, no, the entropy doesn't exist.
And I see that Martijn Weterings beat me to the punch 12 minutes ago! OK, he had it first. :)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
$endgroup$
– mhmt
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "65"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f427352%2fhow-to-know-this-integral-finite-or-infinite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$$int_0^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx $$
substitute $t=e/x$ (and use $dt/dx=-e/x^2$)
$$int_e/c^inftyfrace^2tlog tfrac12dt = log(log(t)) bigvert_e/c^infty$$
which diverges because $log(log(t))$ becomes infinite as $t to infty$
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
$$int_0^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx $$
substitute $t=e/x$ (and use $dt/dx=-e/x^2$)
$$int_e/c^inftyfrace^2tlog tfrac12dt = log(log(t)) bigvert_e/c^infty$$
which diverges because $log(log(t))$ becomes infinite as $t to infty$
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
$$int_0^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx $$
substitute $t=e/x$ (and use $dt/dx=-e/x^2$)
$$int_e/c^inftyfrace^2tlog tfrac12dt = log(log(t)) bigvert_e/c^infty$$
which diverges because $log(log(t))$ becomes infinite as $t to infty$
$endgroup$
$$int_0^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx $$
substitute $t=e/x$ (and use $dt/dx=-e/x^2$)
$$int_e/c^inftyfrace^2tlog tfrac12dt = log(log(t)) bigvert_e/c^infty$$
which diverges because $log(log(t))$ becomes infinite as $t to infty$
answered 8 hours ago
Martijn WeteringsMartijn Weterings
16k24 silver badges70 bronze badges
16k24 silver badges70 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
By u-substitution,
beginaligned
& int_0^c frac1xlog^2 fracex frac12 logfracex , dx
= int_0^c frac12 left(logfracex right)^-1 frac1x dx \[8pt]
& u=logfracex=1-log(x), qquad du=-fracdxx\[8pt]
= & -frac12int u^-1 , du quad text(ignore limits for now) \[8pt]
= & -frac12 log u \[8pt]
= & left. -frac12 log(1-log x) right|_a^c, ~~ textin lim a rightarrow 0\[8pt]
= & -frac12 lim_arightarrow 0 log(1-log c) -log(1-log a)
endaligned
And we see the limit doesn't exist. So, no, the entropy doesn't exist.
And I see that Martijn Weterings beat me to the punch 12 minutes ago! OK, he had it first. :)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
$endgroup$
– mhmt
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
By u-substitution,
beginaligned
& int_0^c frac1xlog^2 fracex frac12 logfracex , dx
= int_0^c frac12 left(logfracex right)^-1 frac1x dx \[8pt]
& u=logfracex=1-log(x), qquad du=-fracdxx\[8pt]
= & -frac12int u^-1 , du quad text(ignore limits for now) \[8pt]
= & -frac12 log u \[8pt]
= & left. -frac12 log(1-log x) right|_a^c, ~~ textin lim a rightarrow 0\[8pt]
= & -frac12 lim_arightarrow 0 log(1-log c) -log(1-log a)
endaligned
And we see the limit doesn't exist. So, no, the entropy doesn't exist.
And I see that Martijn Weterings beat me to the punch 12 minutes ago! OK, he had it first. :)
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
$endgroup$
– mhmt
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
By u-substitution,
beginaligned
& int_0^c frac1xlog^2 fracex frac12 logfracex , dx
= int_0^c frac12 left(logfracex right)^-1 frac1x dx \[8pt]
& u=logfracex=1-log(x), qquad du=-fracdxx\[8pt]
= & -frac12int u^-1 , du quad text(ignore limits for now) \[8pt]
= & -frac12 log u \[8pt]
= & left. -frac12 log(1-log x) right|_a^c, ~~ textin lim a rightarrow 0\[8pt]
= & -frac12 lim_arightarrow 0 log(1-log c) -log(1-log a)
endaligned
And we see the limit doesn't exist. So, no, the entropy doesn't exist.
And I see that Martijn Weterings beat me to the punch 12 minutes ago! OK, he had it first. :)
$endgroup$
By u-substitution,
beginaligned
& int_0^c frac1xlog^2 fracex frac12 logfracex , dx
= int_0^c frac12 left(logfracex right)^-1 frac1x dx \[8pt]
& u=logfracex=1-log(x), qquad du=-fracdxx\[8pt]
= & -frac12int u^-1 , du quad text(ignore limits for now) \[8pt]
= & -frac12 log u \[8pt]
= & left. -frac12 log(1-log x) right|_a^c, ~~ textin lim a rightarrow 0\[8pt]
= & -frac12 lim_arightarrow 0 log(1-log c) -log(1-log a)
endaligned
And we see the limit doesn't exist. So, no, the entropy doesn't exist.
And I see that Martijn Weterings beat me to the punch 12 minutes ago! OK, he had it first. :)
edited 6 hours ago
Michael Hardy
4,82415 silver badges31 bronze badges
4,82415 silver badges31 bronze badges
answered 8 hours ago
Peter LeopoldPeter Leopold
1,3343 silver badges18 bronze badges
1,3343 silver badges18 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
$endgroup$
– mhmt
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
$endgroup$
– mhmt
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
6 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
@MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I find the change of variables u = log(e/x) more elegant. But this is not really integration by parts.
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MartijnWeterings. Quite right. It is u-sub not by-parts. Of course!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
$endgroup$
– mhmt
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thanks Martijn Weterings and Peter Leopold, for your clearly explaining
$endgroup$
– mhmt
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
See my edits for proper MathJax usage.
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
6 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@MichaelHardy, thank you for the edits. I'm a bit astonished that it is considered "proper MathJax usage" to left justify a set of sequentially-derived equations on the '=' sign. Aligning equations on the central '=' sign is considered proper $AMS ~LaTeX$ style, I believe. (See 117 of ams.org/publications/authors/AMS-StyleGuide-online.pdf.) But I guess your point is that MathJax is not $LaTeX$. OK!
$endgroup$
– Peter Leopold
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f427352%2fhow-to-know-this-integral-finite-or-infinite%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
$int_b^cfrac1xlogfracexfrac12dx = -log(log(1/x)+1)bigvert_b^c$ this won't converge when $b=0$ for a proof you might try to change variables $t=e/x$
$endgroup$
– Martijn Weterings
9 hours ago