Kerning for subscripts of sigma? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSubscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeXMargin kerning in Xe(La)TeX for TeXlive 2010: how to enable?Fix math mode kerning of “C”Kerning of subscriptsPair kerning strategies in (pdf)LaTeXKerning and long subscripts or superscriptsKerning super- and subscripts “semantically”Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeXMicrotype kerning won't work with quotationmarksKerning of HyphensIs there a LuaLaTeX solution to adjust superscript kerning on large delimiters?
How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?
Accepted by European university, rejected by all American ones I applied to? Possible reasons?
Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?
Falsification in Math vs Science
Why didn't the Event Horizon Telescope team mention Sagittarius A*?
Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?
Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?
What information about me do stores get via my credit card?
Slides for 30 min~1 hr Skype tenure track application interview
Dropping list elements from nested list after evaluation
Did any laptop computers have a built-in 5 1/4 inch floppy drive?
Why isn't the circumferential light around the M87 black hole's event horizon symmetric?
If I can cast sorceries at instant speed, can I use sorcery-speed activated abilities at instant speed?
Can you cast a spell on someone in the Ethereal Plane, if you are on the Material Plane and have the True Seeing spell active?
If I score a critical hit on an 18 or higher, what are my chances of getting a critical hit if I roll 3d20?
How to type a long/em dash `—`
What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?
Worn-tile Scrabble
Geography at the pixel level
What's the name of these plastic connectors
Why couldn't they take pictures of a closer black hole?
Pokemon Turn Based battle (Python)
A word that means fill it to the required quantity
What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation
Kerning for subscripts of sigma?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSubscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeXMargin kerning in Xe(La)TeX for TeXlive 2010: how to enable?Fix math mode kerning of “C”Kerning of subscriptsPair kerning strategies in (pdf)LaTeXKerning and long subscripts or superscriptsKerning super- and subscripts “semantically”Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeXMicrotype kerning won't work with quotationmarksKerning of HyphensIs there a LuaLaTeX solution to adjust superscript kerning on large delimiters?
Is there any way to reduce the distance inside σ₀ and between sigma
and its subscript in general in the following setup automatically? That is, each time you type in sigma_0
(or sigma_1
etc.), you wish the actual output to be more consistent with sigma_!0
(or sigma_!1
etc.).
Input:
documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0]
[sigma_!0 sigma_!0]
enddocument
Output so far:
As you see, in the upper line the left zero seems to be more close to the right σ (which doesn't make any sense) than to the left one (which would make sense). The kerning in the lower line makes more sense.
I guess, this would be easier than Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeX, since we already have sigma
as a macro and can redefine it.
For which letters in the subscript position the kerning should be improved (and how) is intentionally left unspecified; improving the kerning in sigma_<any single arabic digit or any single Latin small letter>
or sigma_<any nonempty sequence of arabic digits and Latin small letters>
would suffice as a start. Of course, for σ_mathrmT we might need less kerning (e.g., only -1mu rather than -3mu), and that's why capital Latin letters would need more work (and are not asked for in the first step). As of now, I intend to use the following subscripts: all the digits, i, j, k, k (yes, this one upright), n, i + 1, i - 1.
xetex microtype kerning
add a comment |
Is there any way to reduce the distance inside σ₀ and between sigma
and its subscript in general in the following setup automatically? That is, each time you type in sigma_0
(or sigma_1
etc.), you wish the actual output to be more consistent with sigma_!0
(or sigma_!1
etc.).
Input:
documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0]
[sigma_!0 sigma_!0]
enddocument
Output so far:
As you see, in the upper line the left zero seems to be more close to the right σ (which doesn't make any sense) than to the left one (which would make sense). The kerning in the lower line makes more sense.
I guess, this would be easier than Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeX, since we already have sigma
as a macro and can redefine it.
For which letters in the subscript position the kerning should be improved (and how) is intentionally left unspecified; improving the kerning in sigma_<any single arabic digit or any single Latin small letter>
or sigma_<any nonempty sequence of arabic digits and Latin small letters>
would suffice as a start. Of course, for σ_mathrmT we might need less kerning (e.g., only -1mu rather than -3mu), and that's why capital Latin letters would need more work (and are not asked for in the first step). As of now, I intend to use the following subscripts: all the digits, i, j, k, k (yes, this one upright), n, i + 1, i - 1.
xetex microtype kerning
Do you want to change the behaviour forsigma_<any single number>
, or forsigma_<any single character>
, orsigma_<anything>
, or somthing else?
– Phelype Oleinik
4 hours ago
@PhelypeOleinik Question updated.
– user49915
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Is there any way to reduce the distance inside σ₀ and between sigma
and its subscript in general in the following setup automatically? That is, each time you type in sigma_0
(or sigma_1
etc.), you wish the actual output to be more consistent with sigma_!0
(or sigma_!1
etc.).
Input:
documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0]
[sigma_!0 sigma_!0]
enddocument
Output so far:
As you see, in the upper line the left zero seems to be more close to the right σ (which doesn't make any sense) than to the left one (which would make sense). The kerning in the lower line makes more sense.
I guess, this would be easier than Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeX, since we already have sigma
as a macro and can redefine it.
For which letters in the subscript position the kerning should be improved (and how) is intentionally left unspecified; improving the kerning in sigma_<any single arabic digit or any single Latin small letter>
or sigma_<any nonempty sequence of arabic digits and Latin small letters>
would suffice as a start. Of course, for σ_mathrmT we might need less kerning (e.g., only -1mu rather than -3mu), and that's why capital Latin letters would need more work (and are not asked for in the first step). As of now, I intend to use the following subscripts: all the digits, i, j, k, k (yes, this one upright), n, i + 1, i - 1.
xetex microtype kerning
Is there any way to reduce the distance inside σ₀ and between sigma
and its subscript in general in the following setup automatically? That is, each time you type in sigma_0
(or sigma_1
etc.), you wish the actual output to be more consistent with sigma_!0
(or sigma_!1
etc.).
Input:
documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0]
[sigma_!0 sigma_!0]
enddocument
Output so far:
As you see, in the upper line the left zero seems to be more close to the right σ (which doesn't make any sense) than to the left one (which would make sense). The kerning in the lower line makes more sense.
I guess, this would be easier than Subscript kerning for specific letters in XeLaTeX, since we already have sigma
as a macro and can redefine it.
For which letters in the subscript position the kerning should be improved (and how) is intentionally left unspecified; improving the kerning in sigma_<any single arabic digit or any single Latin small letter>
or sigma_<any nonempty sequence of arabic digits and Latin small letters>
would suffice as a start. Of course, for σ_mathrmT we might need less kerning (e.g., only -1mu rather than -3mu), and that's why capital Latin letters would need more work (and are not asked for in the first step). As of now, I intend to use the following subscripts: all the digits, i, j, k, k (yes, this one upright), n, i + 1, i - 1.
xetex microtype kerning
xetex microtype kerning
edited 1 hour ago
user49915
asked 4 hours ago
user49915user49915
764122
764122
Do you want to change the behaviour forsigma_<any single number>
, or forsigma_<any single character>
, orsigma_<anything>
, or somthing else?
– Phelype Oleinik
4 hours ago
@PhelypeOleinik Question updated.
– user49915
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Do you want to change the behaviour forsigma_<any single number>
, or forsigma_<any single character>
, orsigma_<anything>
, or somthing else?
– Phelype Oleinik
4 hours ago
@PhelypeOleinik Question updated.
– user49915
3 hours ago
Do you want to change the behaviour for
sigma_<any single number>
, or for sigma_<any single character>
, or sigma_<anything>
, or somthing else?– Phelype Oleinik
4 hours ago
Do you want to change the behaviour for
sigma_<any single number>
, or for sigma_<any single character>
, or sigma_<anything>
, or somthing else?– Phelype Oleinik
4 hours ago
@PhelypeOleinik Question updated.
– user49915
3 hours ago
@PhelypeOleinik Question updated.
– user49915
3 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I defined a command AddtoKernList<token list><mu kern>
which will add the first token of the <token list>
to a lookup table (the assignment is local). Later on, the sigma
command is redefined to to check for a subscript; if the subscript is found, then it looks the first token in the subscript in the lookup list. If that token is found, mkern<mu kern>
is applied right before the subscript.
I search for the subscript using peek_catcode_remove:NTF
. I could've significantly reduced the code if I had used xparse
's e
-type arguments, as Henri Menke suggested (thanks :-) and egreg did. I'll keep my answer with the first approach, however.
With the defined commands, the input:
$sigma_abc sigma^a_0 sigma_0^b sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernList0-thinmuskip
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernListT-1mu
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
produces (with LuaTeX and lua-visual-debug
to show the negative kern):
Notice that the order of subscript and superscript does not matter (anymore, thanks to far too many lines of code) and notice also that the character is kerned only after the AddtoKernList
instruction. To add temporarily a token to this list, do the assignment in a group.
Code:
documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackagelua-visual-debug
usepackageluatexbase
usepackageunravel
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
ExplSyntaxOn
tl_new:N l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
AtBeginDocument
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
NewDocumentCommandAddtoKernListmm
tl_put_right:Nn l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1 tex_mskip:D #2 scan_stop: #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_sigma_check_superscript:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1
exp_args:NNf
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_superscript:
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_superscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_sub_after_sup:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_sub_after_sup:n #1
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_sub_after_sup:nn #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_superscript_token #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_sub_after_sup:nn #1 #2
exp_args:NNf
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #2
c_math_superscript_token #1
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 q_stop
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 #2 q_stop
exp_args:NNo
tl_case:NnF #1
l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1
#2
ExplSyntaxOff
begindocument
$sigma_abc sigma^a_0 sigma_0^b sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernList0-thinmuskip
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernListT-1mu
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
enddocument
If you prefer the e
-type argument you can add my lookup list to egreg's answer:
AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma
ExplSyntaxOn
tl_new:N l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
NewDocumentCommandAddtoKernListmm
tl_put_right:Nn l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1 tex_mskip:D #2 scan_stop: #1
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 q_stop
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 #2 q_stop
exp_args:NNo
tl_case:NnF #1
l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1
#2
cs_new_eq:NN CheckKernListUse __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n
ExplSyntaxOff
NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
tracingall
csname exp_args:NNfendcsname
standardsigma_
IfValueT#1CheckKernListUse#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%
To make it work for bothsigma_a^b
andsigma^b_a
you could use ane
-type argument (“embellishments”).
– Henri Menke
3 hours ago
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@HenriMenke Thanks for the idea :-) I completely forgot about those. I didn't know, however, that the order in which the arguments were used didn't matter.
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@user49915 If I understand correctly, you want to have a list of characters and the amount of kern to apply to each, is that it?
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@PhelypeOleinik Either the list you mention or a macro which works equivalently to having this list. The list doesn't have to be big, though; I've edited the question and specified the characters that I will use, and you may feel free to take them (or take some others if you wish).
– user49915
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
I'd use the e
argument type of xparse
.
documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
Extension=.otf,
range="2A3E,
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
%mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma
NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
standardsigma
IfValueT#1_!#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0^2 sigma^2_0]
[standardsigma_!0 standardsigma_!0^2 standardsigma^2_!0]
enddocument
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.
– egreg
2 hours ago
I'm afraid that some sub/superscripts might need a little bit different kerning, e.g.sigma_top
. There is no overlap, of course, but I'm feeling slightly uneasy about allowing for all possible subscripts to be moved left by 3mu.
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I don't know what subscripts you want to use next tosigma
. You probably should kern less than -3mu generally.
– egreg
2 hours ago
Initially: all the digits, i, j, k, k, n, i + 1, i - 1.
– user49915
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484404%2fkerning-for-subscripts-of-sigma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I defined a command AddtoKernList<token list><mu kern>
which will add the first token of the <token list>
to a lookup table (the assignment is local). Later on, the sigma
command is redefined to to check for a subscript; if the subscript is found, then it looks the first token in the subscript in the lookup list. If that token is found, mkern<mu kern>
is applied right before the subscript.
I search for the subscript using peek_catcode_remove:NTF
. I could've significantly reduced the code if I had used xparse
's e
-type arguments, as Henri Menke suggested (thanks :-) and egreg did. I'll keep my answer with the first approach, however.
With the defined commands, the input:
$sigma_abc sigma^a_0 sigma_0^b sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernList0-thinmuskip
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernListT-1mu
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
produces (with LuaTeX and lua-visual-debug
to show the negative kern):
Notice that the order of subscript and superscript does not matter (anymore, thanks to far too many lines of code) and notice also that the character is kerned only after the AddtoKernList
instruction. To add temporarily a token to this list, do the assignment in a group.
Code:
documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackagelua-visual-debug
usepackageluatexbase
usepackageunravel
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
ExplSyntaxOn
tl_new:N l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
AtBeginDocument
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
NewDocumentCommandAddtoKernListmm
tl_put_right:Nn l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1 tex_mskip:D #2 scan_stop: #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_sigma_check_superscript:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1
exp_args:NNf
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_superscript:
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_superscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_sub_after_sup:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_sub_after_sup:n #1
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_sub_after_sup:nn #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_superscript_token #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_sub_after_sup:nn #1 #2
exp_args:NNf
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #2
c_math_superscript_token #1
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 q_stop
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 #2 q_stop
exp_args:NNo
tl_case:NnF #1
l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1
#2
ExplSyntaxOff
begindocument
$sigma_abc sigma^a_0 sigma_0^b sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernList0-thinmuskip
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernListT-1mu
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
enddocument
If you prefer the e
-type argument you can add my lookup list to egreg's answer:
AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma
ExplSyntaxOn
tl_new:N l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
NewDocumentCommandAddtoKernListmm
tl_put_right:Nn l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1 tex_mskip:D #2 scan_stop: #1
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 q_stop
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 #2 q_stop
exp_args:NNo
tl_case:NnF #1
l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1
#2
cs_new_eq:NN CheckKernListUse __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n
ExplSyntaxOff
NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
tracingall
csname exp_args:NNfendcsname
standardsigma_
IfValueT#1CheckKernListUse#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%
To make it work for bothsigma_a^b
andsigma^b_a
you could use ane
-type argument (“embellishments”).
– Henri Menke
3 hours ago
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@HenriMenke Thanks for the idea :-) I completely forgot about those. I didn't know, however, that the order in which the arguments were used didn't matter.
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@user49915 If I understand correctly, you want to have a list of characters and the amount of kern to apply to each, is that it?
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@PhelypeOleinik Either the list you mention or a macro which works equivalently to having this list. The list doesn't have to be big, though; I've edited the question and specified the characters that I will use, and you may feel free to take them (or take some others if you wish).
– user49915
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
I defined a command AddtoKernList<token list><mu kern>
which will add the first token of the <token list>
to a lookup table (the assignment is local). Later on, the sigma
command is redefined to to check for a subscript; if the subscript is found, then it looks the first token in the subscript in the lookup list. If that token is found, mkern<mu kern>
is applied right before the subscript.
I search for the subscript using peek_catcode_remove:NTF
. I could've significantly reduced the code if I had used xparse
's e
-type arguments, as Henri Menke suggested (thanks :-) and egreg did. I'll keep my answer with the first approach, however.
With the defined commands, the input:
$sigma_abc sigma^a_0 sigma_0^b sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernList0-thinmuskip
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernListT-1mu
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
produces (with LuaTeX and lua-visual-debug
to show the negative kern):
Notice that the order of subscript and superscript does not matter (anymore, thanks to far too many lines of code) and notice also that the character is kerned only after the AddtoKernList
instruction. To add temporarily a token to this list, do the assignment in a group.
Code:
documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackagelua-visual-debug
usepackageluatexbase
usepackageunravel
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
ExplSyntaxOn
tl_new:N l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
AtBeginDocument
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
NewDocumentCommandAddtoKernListmm
tl_put_right:Nn l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1 tex_mskip:D #2 scan_stop: #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_sigma_check_superscript:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1
exp_args:NNf
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_superscript:
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_superscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_sub_after_sup:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_sub_after_sup:n #1
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_sub_after_sup:nn #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_superscript_token #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_sub_after_sup:nn #1 #2
exp_args:NNf
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #2
c_math_superscript_token #1
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 q_stop
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 #2 q_stop
exp_args:NNo
tl_case:NnF #1
l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1
#2
ExplSyntaxOff
begindocument
$sigma_abc sigma^a_0 sigma_0^b sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernList0-thinmuskip
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernListT-1mu
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
enddocument
If you prefer the e
-type argument you can add my lookup list to egreg's answer:
AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma
ExplSyntaxOn
tl_new:N l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
NewDocumentCommandAddtoKernListmm
tl_put_right:Nn l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1 tex_mskip:D #2 scan_stop: #1
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 q_stop
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 #2 q_stop
exp_args:NNo
tl_case:NnF #1
l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1
#2
cs_new_eq:NN CheckKernListUse __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n
ExplSyntaxOff
NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
tracingall
csname exp_args:NNfendcsname
standardsigma_
IfValueT#1CheckKernListUse#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%
To make it work for bothsigma_a^b
andsigma^b_a
you could use ane
-type argument (“embellishments”).
– Henri Menke
3 hours ago
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@HenriMenke Thanks for the idea :-) I completely forgot about those. I didn't know, however, that the order in which the arguments were used didn't matter.
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@user49915 If I understand correctly, you want to have a list of characters and the amount of kern to apply to each, is that it?
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@PhelypeOleinik Either the list you mention or a macro which works equivalently to having this list. The list doesn't have to be big, though; I've edited the question and specified the characters that I will use, and you may feel free to take them (or take some others if you wish).
– user49915
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
I defined a command AddtoKernList<token list><mu kern>
which will add the first token of the <token list>
to a lookup table (the assignment is local). Later on, the sigma
command is redefined to to check for a subscript; if the subscript is found, then it looks the first token in the subscript in the lookup list. If that token is found, mkern<mu kern>
is applied right before the subscript.
I search for the subscript using peek_catcode_remove:NTF
. I could've significantly reduced the code if I had used xparse
's e
-type arguments, as Henri Menke suggested (thanks :-) and egreg did. I'll keep my answer with the first approach, however.
With the defined commands, the input:
$sigma_abc sigma^a_0 sigma_0^b sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernList0-thinmuskip
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernListT-1mu
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
produces (with LuaTeX and lua-visual-debug
to show the negative kern):
Notice that the order of subscript and superscript does not matter (anymore, thanks to far too many lines of code) and notice also that the character is kerned only after the AddtoKernList
instruction. To add temporarily a token to this list, do the assignment in a group.
Code:
documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackagelua-visual-debug
usepackageluatexbase
usepackageunravel
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
ExplSyntaxOn
tl_new:N l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
AtBeginDocument
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
NewDocumentCommandAddtoKernListmm
tl_put_right:Nn l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1 tex_mskip:D #2 scan_stop: #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_sigma_check_superscript:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1
exp_args:NNf
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_superscript:
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_superscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_sub_after_sup:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_sub_after_sup:n #1
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_sub_after_sup:nn #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_superscript_token #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_sub_after_sup:nn #1 #2
exp_args:NNf
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #2
c_math_superscript_token #1
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 q_stop
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 #2 q_stop
exp_args:NNo
tl_case:NnF #1
l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1
#2
ExplSyntaxOff
begindocument
$sigma_abc sigma^a_0 sigma_0^b sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernList0-thinmuskip
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernListT-1mu
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
enddocument
If you prefer the e
-type argument you can add my lookup list to egreg's answer:
AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma
ExplSyntaxOn
tl_new:N l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
NewDocumentCommandAddtoKernListmm
tl_put_right:Nn l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1 tex_mskip:D #2 scan_stop: #1
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 q_stop
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 #2 q_stop
exp_args:NNo
tl_case:NnF #1
l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1
#2
cs_new_eq:NN CheckKernListUse __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n
ExplSyntaxOff
NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
tracingall
csname exp_args:NNfendcsname
standardsigma_
IfValueT#1CheckKernListUse#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%
I defined a command AddtoKernList<token list><mu kern>
which will add the first token of the <token list>
to a lookup table (the assignment is local). Later on, the sigma
command is redefined to to check for a subscript; if the subscript is found, then it looks the first token in the subscript in the lookup list. If that token is found, mkern<mu kern>
is applied right before the subscript.
I search for the subscript using peek_catcode_remove:NTF
. I could've significantly reduced the code if I had used xparse
's e
-type arguments, as Henri Menke suggested (thanks :-) and egreg did. I'll keep my answer with the first approach, however.
With the defined commands, the input:
$sigma_abc sigma^a_0 sigma_0^b sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernList0-thinmuskip
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernListT-1mu
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
produces (with LuaTeX and lua-visual-debug
to show the negative kern):
Notice that the order of subscript and superscript does not matter (anymore, thanks to far too many lines of code) and notice also that the character is kerned only after the AddtoKernList
instruction. To add temporarily a token to this list, do the assignment in a group.
Code:
documentclass[varwidth]standalone
usepackagelua-visual-debug
usepackageluatexbase
usepackageunravel
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
setmainfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX]TeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,range=setminus]Asana Math
setmathfont[Ligatures=TeX,Extension=.otf,range="2A3E,BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold]XITSMath-Regular%%% The fat semicolon
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
ExplSyntaxOn
tl_new:N l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
AtBeginDocument
cs_new_eq:NN __userxlixk_actual_sigma: sigma
RenewDocumentCommandsigma
__userxlixk_sigma:
NewDocumentCommandAddtoKernListmm
tl_put_right:Nn l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1 tex_mskip:D #2 scan_stop: #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma:
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n
__userxlixk_sigma_check_superscript:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_group:n #1
exp_args:NNf
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_superscript:
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_superscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_check_sub_after_sup:n
__userxlixk_actual_sigma:
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_check_sub_after_sup:n #1
peek_catcode_remove:NTF c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_sigma_sub_after_sup:nn #1
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_superscript_token #1
cs_new_protected:Npn __userxlixk_sigma_sub_after_sup:nn #1 #2
exp_args:NNf
__userxlixk_actual_sigma: c_math_subscript_token
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #2
c_math_superscript_token #1
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 q_stop
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 #2 q_stop
exp_args:NNo
tl_case:NnF #1
l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1
#2
ExplSyntaxOff
begindocument
$sigma_abc sigma^a_0 sigma_0^b sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernList0-thinmuskip
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
AddtoKernListT-1mu
$sigma_abc sigma_0^a sigma^b_0 sigma^c_T$
enddocument
If you prefer the e
-type argument you can add my lookup list to egreg's answer:
AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma
ExplSyntaxOn
tl_new:N l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
NewDocumentCommandAddtoKernListmm
tl_put_right:Nn l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1 tex_mskip:D #2 scan_stop: #1
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n #1
__userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 q_stop
cs_new:Npn __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:Nw #1 #2 q_stop
exp_args:NNo
tl_case:NnF #1
l__userxlixk_kern_case_tl
#1
#2
cs_new_eq:NN CheckKernListUse __userxlixk_check_kern_list_use:n
ExplSyntaxOff
NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
tracingall
csname exp_args:NNfendcsname
standardsigma_
IfValueT#1CheckKernListUse#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%
edited 44 mins ago
answered 3 hours ago
Phelype OleinikPhelype Oleinik
25.1k54690
25.1k54690
To make it work for bothsigma_a^b
andsigma^b_a
you could use ane
-type argument (“embellishments”).
– Henri Menke
3 hours ago
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@HenriMenke Thanks for the idea :-) I completely forgot about those. I didn't know, however, that the order in which the arguments were used didn't matter.
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@user49915 If I understand correctly, you want to have a list of characters and the amount of kern to apply to each, is that it?
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@PhelypeOleinik Either the list you mention or a macro which works equivalently to having this list. The list doesn't have to be big, though; I've edited the question and specified the characters that I will use, and you may feel free to take them (or take some others if you wish).
– user49915
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
To make it work for bothsigma_a^b
andsigma^b_a
you could use ane
-type argument (“embellishments”).
– Henri Menke
3 hours ago
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@HenriMenke Thanks for the idea :-) I completely forgot about those. I didn't know, however, that the order in which the arguments were used didn't matter.
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@user49915 If I understand correctly, you want to have a list of characters and the amount of kern to apply to each, is that it?
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@PhelypeOleinik Either the list you mention or a macro which works equivalently to having this list. The list doesn't have to be big, though; I've edited the question and specified the characters that I will use, and you may feel free to take them (or take some others if you wish).
– user49915
1 hour ago
To make it work for both
sigma_a^b
and sigma^b_a
you could use an e
-type argument (“embellishments”).– Henri Menke
3 hours ago
To make it work for both
sigma_a^b
and sigma^b_a
you could use an e
-type argument (“embellishments”).– Henri Menke
3 hours ago
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?
– user49915
2 hours ago
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric rather than checking that the whole subscript is single-token?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@HenriMenke Thanks for the idea :-) I completely forgot about those. I didn't know, however, that the order in which the arguments were used didn't matter.
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@HenriMenke Thanks for the idea :-) I completely forgot about those. I didn't know, however, that the order in which the arguments were used didn't matter.
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@user49915 If I understand correctly, you want to have a list of characters and the amount of kern to apply to each, is that it?
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@user49915 If I understand correctly, you want to have a list of characters and the amount of kern to apply to each, is that it?
– Phelype Oleinik
1 hour ago
@PhelypeOleinik Either the list you mention or a macro which works equivalently to having this list. The list doesn't have to be big, though; I've edited the question and specified the characters that I will use, and you may feel free to take them (or take some others if you wish).
– user49915
1 hour ago
@PhelypeOleinik Either the list you mention or a macro which works equivalently to having this list. The list doesn't have to be big, though; I've edited the question and specified the characters that I will use, and you may feel free to take them (or take some others if you wish).
– user49915
1 hour ago
|
show 3 more comments
I'd use the e
argument type of xparse
.
documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
Extension=.otf,
range="2A3E,
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
%mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma
NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
standardsigma
IfValueT#1_!#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0^2 sigma^2_0]
[standardsigma_!0 standardsigma_!0^2 standardsigma^2_!0]
enddocument
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.
– egreg
2 hours ago
I'm afraid that some sub/superscripts might need a little bit different kerning, e.g.sigma_top
. There is no overlap, of course, but I'm feeling slightly uneasy about allowing for all possible subscripts to be moved left by 3mu.
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I don't know what subscripts you want to use next tosigma
. You probably should kern less than -3mu generally.
– egreg
2 hours ago
Initially: all the digits, i, j, k, k, n, i + 1, i - 1.
– user49915
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I'd use the e
argument type of xparse
.
documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
Extension=.otf,
range="2A3E,
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
%mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma
NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
standardsigma
IfValueT#1_!#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0^2 sigma^2_0]
[standardsigma_!0 standardsigma_!0^2 standardsigma^2_!0]
enddocument
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.
– egreg
2 hours ago
I'm afraid that some sub/superscripts might need a little bit different kerning, e.g.sigma_top
. There is no overlap, of course, but I'm feeling slightly uneasy about allowing for all possible subscripts to be moved left by 3mu.
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I don't know what subscripts you want to use next tosigma
. You probably should kern less than -3mu generally.
– egreg
2 hours ago
Initially: all the digits, i, j, k, k, n, i + 1, i - 1.
– user49915
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I'd use the e
argument type of xparse
.
documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
Extension=.otf,
range="2A3E,
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
%mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma
NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
standardsigma
IfValueT#1_!#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0^2 sigma^2_0]
[standardsigma_!0 standardsigma_!0^2 standardsigma^2_!0]
enddocument
I'd use the e
argument type of xparse
.
documentclassbook
usepackagefontspec
usepackage[american,british,french,norsk,german,ngerman]babel
usepackagemathtools
usepackageamssymb
usepackageunicode-math
usepackage[babel=true,verbose=errors]microtype
setmainfontTeX Gyre Termes
setsansfontTeX Gyre Heros[Scale=0.88]
setmonofontTeX Gyre Cursor
setmathfontTeX Gyre Termes Math
setmathfontAsana Math[
range=setminus,
]
setmathfontXITSMath-Regular[
Extension=.otf,
range="2A3E,
BoldFont=XITSMath-Bold,
]
%mathtoolssetmathic=true %%% See http://tex.stackexchange.com/a/3496/
AtBeginDocument%
letstandardsigmasigma
letsigmakernedsigma
NewDocumentCommandkernedsigmae_^%
standardsigma
IfValueT#1_!#1%
IfValueT#2^#2%
begindocument
[sigma_0 sigma_0^2 sigma^2_0]
[standardsigma_!0 standardsigma_!0^2 standardsigma^2_!0]
enddocument
answered 2 hours ago
egregegreg
733k8919313254
733k8919313254
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.
– egreg
2 hours ago
I'm afraid that some sub/superscripts might need a little bit different kerning, e.g.sigma_top
. There is no overlap, of course, but I'm feeling slightly uneasy about allowing for all possible subscripts to be moved left by 3mu.
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I don't know what subscripts you want to use next tosigma
. You probably should kern less than -3mu generally.
– egreg
2 hours ago
Initially: all the digits, i, j, k, k, n, i + 1, i - 1.
– user49915
2 hours ago
add a comment |
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.
– egreg
2 hours ago
I'm afraid that some sub/superscripts might need a little bit different kerning, e.g.sigma_top
. There is no overlap, of course, but I'm feeling slightly uneasy about allowing for all possible subscripts to be moved left by 3mu.
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I don't know what subscripts you want to use next tosigma
. You probably should kern less than -3mu generally.
– egreg
2 hours ago
Initially: all the digits, i, j, k, k, n, i + 1, i - 1.
– user49915
2 hours ago
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?
– user49915
2 hours ago
First, thanks! Second, could you adapt your code slightly such that it checks that the first subscript letter (or all subscript letters, it doesn't matter as of now) is small alphanumeric? We don't really know whether it would produce a pleasant kerning for all other possible subscripts, would we?
– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.
– egreg
2 hours ago
@user49915 I'm not sure what could be the difference. One can quite easily exclude some symbols from being kerned.
– egreg
2 hours ago
I'm afraid that some sub/superscripts might need a little bit different kerning, e.g.
sigma_top
. There is no overlap, of course, but I'm feeling slightly uneasy about allowing for all possible subscripts to be moved left by 3mu.– user49915
2 hours ago
I'm afraid that some sub/superscripts might need a little bit different kerning, e.g.
sigma_top
. There is no overlap, of course, but I'm feeling slightly uneasy about allowing for all possible subscripts to be moved left by 3mu.– user49915
2 hours ago
@user49915 I don't know what subscripts you want to use next to
sigma
. You probably should kern less than -3mu generally.– egreg
2 hours ago
@user49915 I don't know what subscripts you want to use next to
sigma
. You probably should kern less than -3mu generally.– egreg
2 hours ago
Initially: all the digits, i, j, k, k, n, i + 1, i - 1.
– user49915
2 hours ago
Initially: all the digits, i, j, k, k, n, i + 1, i - 1.
– user49915
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484404%2fkerning-for-subscripts-of-sigma%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you want to change the behaviour for
sigma_<any single number>
, or forsigma_<any single character>
, orsigma_<anything>
, or somthing else?– Phelype Oleinik
4 hours ago
@PhelypeOleinik Question updated.
– user49915
3 hours ago