Xjyuk

Output the Arecibo Message

What is the most efficient way to store a numeric range?

How come people say “Would of”?

How to notate time signature switching consistently every measure

How to display lines in a file like ls displays files in a directory?

What is the meaning of Triage in Cybersec world?

Finding the area between two curves with Integrate

Time travel alters history but people keep saying nothing's changed

Falsification in Math vs Science

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

Likelihood that a superbug or lethal virus could come from a landfill

What could be the right powersource for 15 seconds lifespan disposable giant chainsaw?

How much of the clove should I use when using big garlic heads?

How can I have a shield and a way of attacking with a ranged weapon at the same time?

Does HR tell a hiring manager about salary negotiations?

What is this sharp, curved notch on my knife for?

Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?

Is it safe to harvest rainwater that fell on solar panels?

Kerning for subscripts of sigma?

How do I free up internal storage if I don't have any apps downloaded?

What is this business jet?

A word that means fill it to the required quantity

Can you cast a spell on someone in the Ethereal Plane, if you are on the Material Plane and have the True Seeing spell active?

Why are there uneven bright areas in this photo of black hole?

Is there a way to generate a uniformly distributed point on a sphere from a fixed amount of random real numbers?

2

1

$begingroup$

The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.

geometry

share|cite|improve this question

edited 3 mins ago

robjohn♦

271k27313642

asked 2 hours ago

The Zach ManThe Zach Man

1007

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
  $endgroup$
  – robjohn♦
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
  $endgroup$
  – robjohn♦
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
  $endgroup$
  – The Zach Man
  22 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

2

1

$begingroup$

The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.

geometry

share|cite|improve this question

edited 3 mins ago

robjohn♦

271k27313642

asked 2 hours ago

The Zach ManThe Zach Man

1007

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  So what you want is a uniform distribution. It would be helpful to state this explicitly.
  $endgroup$
  – robjohn♦
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Distribute longitude uniformly and the sine of the latitude uniformly. Then the distribution of points on the sphere will be uniform.
  $endgroup$
  – robjohn♦
  2 hours ago
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @robjohn thank you, you're right that I forgot to specify that.
  $endgroup$
  – The Zach Man
  22 mins ago
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The obvious solution of Lattitude & Longitude doesn't work because it generates points more densely near the poles, and the other thing I came up with (Pick a random point in the unit cube, if it's in the sphere map it to the surface, and restart if it's outside) doesn't always find a point within a fixed number of tries.

geometry

share|cite|improve this question

edited 3 mins ago

robjohn♦

271k27313642

asked 2 hours ago

The Zach ManThe Zach Man

1007

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this question

edited 3 mins ago

robjohn♦

271k27313642

asked 2 hours ago

The Zach ManThe Zach Man

1007

share|cite|improve this question

edited 3 mins ago

robjohn♦

271k27313642

asked 2 hours ago

The Zach ManThe Zach Man

1007

edited 3 mins ago

robjohn♦

271k27313642

edited 3 mins ago

robjohn♦

271k27313642

asked 2 hours ago

The Zach ManThe Zach Man

1007

asked 2 hours ago

The Zach ManThe Zach Man

1007

2 Answers
2

active

oldest

votes

2

$begingroup$

The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.

For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either

$mathrmlat=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrmlon=2pi u_2$

or

$z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt1-z^2cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt1-z^2sin(2pi u_2)$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 38 mins ago

robjohn♦robjohn

271k27313642

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.

Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.

(The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

49k757107

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3184449%2fis-there-a-way-to-generate-a-uniformly-distributed-point-on-a-sphere-from-a-fixe%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

2

$begingroup$

The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.

For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either

$mathrmlat=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrmlon=2pi u_2$

or

$z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt1-z^2cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt1-z^2sin(2pi u_2)$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 38 mins ago

robjohn♦robjohn

271k27313642

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.

For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either

$mathrmlat=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrmlon=2pi u_2$

or

$z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt1-z^2cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt1-z^2sin(2pi u_2)$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 38 mins ago

robjohn♦robjohn

271k27313642

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

The Lambert cylindrical equal area projection maps the sphere to a cylinder, area to equal area. It is easy to generate a uniform distribution on a cylinder. Simply map it back to the sphere.

For $(u_1,u_2)$ uniform on $[0,1]^2$, either

$mathrmlat=arcsin(2u_1-1),mathrmlon=2pi u_2$

or

$z=2u_1-1,x=sqrt1-z^2cos(2pi u_2),y=sqrt1-z^2sin(2pi u_2)$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 38 mins ago

robjohn♦robjohn

271k27313642

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 38 mins ago

robjohn♦robjohn

271k27313642

answered 38 mins ago

robjohn♦robjohn

271k27313642

answered 38 mins ago

robjohn♦robjohn

271k27313642

2

$begingroup$

Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.

Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.

(The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

49k757107

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

2

$begingroup$

Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.

Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.

(The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

49k757107

$endgroup$

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

Your method, even though it doesn't finish in a fixed number of times, is a reasonable way to do it. Each trial succeeds with probability $fracpi6$, which is better than $frac12$: the average number of trials is less than $2$.

Another standard method is to use the normal distribution. Generate $x, y, z$ independently from a standard normal distribution, then take the point $(x,y,z)$ and divide it by $sqrtx^2+y^2+z^2$ as you did for points inside the cube. The multivariate normal distribution is rotationally symmetric, so this will get you evenly distributed points on the sphere.

(The Box–Muller transform is one way to generate normally distributed random numbers, and some versions of it do not use rejection sampling, so they can be done with a "fixed amount" of randomness.)

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

49k757107

$endgroup$

share|cite|improve this answer

answered 2 hours ago

Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

49k757107

answered 2 hours ago

Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

49k757107

answered 2 hours ago

Misha LavrovMisha Lavrov

49k757107