Poisson distribution: why does time between events follow an exponential distribution?The Number of Exponential Summands in a Fixed Interval is Poisson

X-shaped crossword

Can a magnetic field of an object be stronger than its gravity?

Secure offsite backup, even in the case of hacker root access

Working in the USA for living expenses only; allowed on VWP?

What flavor of zksnark in tezos

What are they doing to this poor rocket?

What does it mean by "d-ism of Leibniz" and "dotage of Newton" in simple English?

Java 8: How to convert String to Map<String,List<String>>?

What is a simple, physical situation where complex numbers emerge naturally?

Can you please explain this joke: "I'm going bananas is what I tell my bananas before I leave the house"?

Personalization conditions switching doesn`t work in Experience Editor (9.1.0, Initial Release)

What happens if you do emergency landing on a US base in middle of the ocean?

Accidentally cashed a check twice

What is the history of the check mark / tick mark?

I wrote a scene that the majority of my readers loved. How do I get back to that place while writing my new book?

Building a road to escape Earth's gravity by making a pyramid on Antartica

Applicants clearly not having the skills they advertise

Old black and white movie: glowing black rocks slowly turn you into stone upon touch

What happened to all the nuclear material being smuggled after the fall of the USSR?

Convert camelCase and PascalCase to Title Case

Opposite of "Squeaky wheel gets the grease"

Word for a small burst of laughter that can't be held back

Is it OK to bring delicacies from hometown as tokens of gratitude for an out-of-town interview?

PhD student with mental health issues and bad performance



Poisson distribution: why does time between events follow an exponential distribution?


The Number of Exponential Summands in a Fixed Interval is Poisson






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I was reading an article, and came across the following:




Purchase count follows a Poisson distribution with rate λ. In other
words, the timing of these purchases is somewhat random, but the rate
(in counts/unit time) is constant. In turn, this implies that the
inter-purchase time at the customer level should follow an exponential
distribution.




It's been quite a while since I did any statistics so I am struggling with the definitions of a Poisson distribution. What I understand by the "rate is constant" is that if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?



Where I believe I am confused is with the final sentence. Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on? Doesn't this contradict the idea that we have a constant rate of purchase?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    $$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    5 hours ago

















3












$begingroup$


I was reading an article, and came across the following:




Purchase count follows a Poisson distribution with rate λ. In other
words, the timing of these purchases is somewhat random, but the rate
(in counts/unit time) is constant. In turn, this implies that the
inter-purchase time at the customer level should follow an exponential
distribution.




It's been quite a while since I did any statistics so I am struggling with the definitions of a Poisson distribution. What I understand by the "rate is constant" is that if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?



Where I believe I am confused is with the final sentence. Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on? Doesn't this contradict the idea that we have a constant rate of purchase?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    $$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    5 hours ago













3












3








3


1



$begingroup$


I was reading an article, and came across the following:




Purchase count follows a Poisson distribution with rate λ. In other
words, the timing of these purchases is somewhat random, but the rate
(in counts/unit time) is constant. In turn, this implies that the
inter-purchase time at the customer level should follow an exponential
distribution.




It's been quite a while since I did any statistics so I am struggling with the definitions of a Poisson distribution. What I understand by the "rate is constant" is that if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?



Where I believe I am confused is with the final sentence. Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on? Doesn't this contradict the idea that we have a constant rate of purchase?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I was reading an article, and came across the following:




Purchase count follows a Poisson distribution with rate λ. In other
words, the timing of these purchases is somewhat random, but the rate
(in counts/unit time) is constant. In turn, this implies that the
inter-purchase time at the customer level should follow an exponential
distribution.




It's been quite a while since I did any statistics so I am struggling with the definitions of a Poisson distribution. What I understand by the "rate is constant" is that if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?



Where I believe I am confused is with the final sentence. Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on? Doesn't this contradict the idea that we have a constant rate of purchase?







poisson-distribution






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 9 hours ago









J. StottJ. Stott

163




163











  • $begingroup$
    For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    $$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    5 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
    $endgroup$
    – whuber
    8 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    $$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
    $endgroup$
    – Michael Hardy
    5 hours ago















$begingroup$
For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
$endgroup$
– whuber
8 hours ago





$begingroup$
For a full account of this, including definitions, see stats.stackexchange.com/questions/214421. For related posts, see stats.stackexchange.com/… Another useful search (focusing on "memoryless") is stats.stackexchange.com/….
$endgroup$
– whuber
8 hours ago













$begingroup$
$$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
$$$$ "if a customer purchases 1 thing on average in a week, they purchase 4 things on average in a four-week period. Is this correct?" $textbfYes.$ $$$$ "Is this saying that the time between a customers purchases would grow exponentially as time goes on?" $textbfNo,$ that's not what it means at all. $qquad$
$endgroup$
– Michael Hardy
5 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

Exponential distribution doesn't imply that time between events grows exponentially. All it tells you is that probability to wait longer between events declines very quickly with waiting time. The probability density is:$$lambda e^-lambda t$$ where $lambda$ is Poisson intensity, i.e. average number of events in unit of time, and $t$ is the waiting time. The average waiting time is obviously $1/lambda$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    Let $X_t$ be the number of arrivals in the Poisson process with rate $lambda$ between time $0$ and time $tge0.$ Then we have
    $$
    Pr(X_t=x) = frac(lambda t)^x e^-lambda tx! text for x=0,1,2,3,ldots
    $$



    Let $T$ be the time until the first arrival.



    Then the following two events are really both the same event:
    $$
    Big[ X_t=0Big]. qquad Big[ T>t Big].
    $$

    So they both have the same probability. Thus
    $$
    Pr(T>t) = Pr(X_t=0) = frac(lambda t)^0 e^-lambda t0! = e^-lambda t.
    $$

    So
    $$
    Pr(T>t) = e^-lambda t text for tge0.
    $$

    That says $T$ is exponentially distributed.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "65"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f411018%2fpoisson-distribution-why-does-time-between-events-follow-an-exponential-distrib%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2












      $begingroup$

      Exponential distribution doesn't imply that time between events grows exponentially. All it tells you is that probability to wait longer between events declines very quickly with waiting time. The probability density is:$$lambda e^-lambda t$$ where $lambda$ is Poisson intensity, i.e. average number of events in unit of time, and $t$ is the waiting time. The average waiting time is obviously $1/lambda$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        2












        $begingroup$

        Exponential distribution doesn't imply that time between events grows exponentially. All it tells you is that probability to wait longer between events declines very quickly with waiting time. The probability density is:$$lambda e^-lambda t$$ where $lambda$ is Poisson intensity, i.e. average number of events in unit of time, and $t$ is the waiting time. The average waiting time is obviously $1/lambda$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Exponential distribution doesn't imply that time between events grows exponentially. All it tells you is that probability to wait longer between events declines very quickly with waiting time. The probability density is:$$lambda e^-lambda t$$ where $lambda$ is Poisson intensity, i.e. average number of events in unit of time, and $t$ is the waiting time. The average waiting time is obviously $1/lambda$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Exponential distribution doesn't imply that time between events grows exponentially. All it tells you is that probability to wait longer between events declines very quickly with waiting time. The probability density is:$$lambda e^-lambda t$$ where $lambda$ is Poisson intensity, i.e. average number of events in unit of time, and $t$ is the waiting time. The average waiting time is obviously $1/lambda$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 9 hours ago









          AksakalAksakal

          40.4k453121




          40.4k453121























              2












              $begingroup$

              Let $X_t$ be the number of arrivals in the Poisson process with rate $lambda$ between time $0$ and time $tge0.$ Then we have
              $$
              Pr(X_t=x) = frac(lambda t)^x e^-lambda tx! text for x=0,1,2,3,ldots
              $$



              Let $T$ be the time until the first arrival.



              Then the following two events are really both the same event:
              $$
              Big[ X_t=0Big]. qquad Big[ T>t Big].
              $$

              So they both have the same probability. Thus
              $$
              Pr(T>t) = Pr(X_t=0) = frac(lambda t)^0 e^-lambda t0! = e^-lambda t.
              $$

              So
              $$
              Pr(T>t) = e^-lambda t text for tge0.
              $$

              That says $T$ is exponentially distributed.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                Let $X_t$ be the number of arrivals in the Poisson process with rate $lambda$ between time $0$ and time $tge0.$ Then we have
                $$
                Pr(X_t=x) = frac(lambda t)^x e^-lambda tx! text for x=0,1,2,3,ldots
                $$



                Let $T$ be the time until the first arrival.



                Then the following two events are really both the same event:
                $$
                Big[ X_t=0Big]. qquad Big[ T>t Big].
                $$

                So they both have the same probability. Thus
                $$
                Pr(T>t) = Pr(X_t=0) = frac(lambda t)^0 e^-lambda t0! = e^-lambda t.
                $$

                So
                $$
                Pr(T>t) = e^-lambda t text for tge0.
                $$

                That says $T$ is exponentially distributed.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Let $X_t$ be the number of arrivals in the Poisson process with rate $lambda$ between time $0$ and time $tge0.$ Then we have
                  $$
                  Pr(X_t=x) = frac(lambda t)^x e^-lambda tx! text for x=0,1,2,3,ldots
                  $$



                  Let $T$ be the time until the first arrival.



                  Then the following two events are really both the same event:
                  $$
                  Big[ X_t=0Big]. qquad Big[ T>t Big].
                  $$

                  So they both have the same probability. Thus
                  $$
                  Pr(T>t) = Pr(X_t=0) = frac(lambda t)^0 e^-lambda t0! = e^-lambda t.
                  $$

                  So
                  $$
                  Pr(T>t) = e^-lambda t text for tge0.
                  $$

                  That says $T$ is exponentially distributed.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Let $X_t$ be the number of arrivals in the Poisson process with rate $lambda$ between time $0$ and time $tge0.$ Then we have
                  $$
                  Pr(X_t=x) = frac(lambda t)^x e^-lambda tx! text for x=0,1,2,3,ldots
                  $$



                  Let $T$ be the time until the first arrival.



                  Then the following two events are really both the same event:
                  $$
                  Big[ X_t=0Big]. qquad Big[ T>t Big].
                  $$

                  So they both have the same probability. Thus
                  $$
                  Pr(T>t) = Pr(X_t=0) = frac(lambda t)^0 e^-lambda t0! = e^-lambda t.
                  $$

                  So
                  $$
                  Pr(T>t) = e^-lambda t text for tge0.
                  $$

                  That says $T$ is exponentially distributed.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 6 hours ago









                  Michael HardyMichael Hardy

                  4,2791430




                  4,2791430



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f411018%2fpoisson-distribution-why-does-time-between-events-follow-an-exponential-distrib%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                      Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                      19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу