Can an escape pod land on Earth from orbit and not be immediately detected?Would it be possible to shift Titan from its current orbit into an orbit around Earth for terraforming purposes?reasonable travel time from high earth orbit to earth/sun L4/L5 (IT restrictive world)Can you shoot someone with a bullet… from orbit?Can you catch a fish with a fishing rod… from orbit?Can I use my earth-changing invention to hide in orbit?How to escape from a small super-earth?Can sunflares hit earth, and what are they?-Question from Maze Runner seriesCan my spaceship figure out its position using Cepheid Variables?Big moon, small planet - can an earth sized moon orbit a moon sized planet?How would the transfer of mass from the Moon to Earth change the rotation, orbit and speed of the Moon and Earth?

Does the UK delegate some immigration control to the Republic of Ireland?

Does WiFi affect the quality of images downloaded from the internet?

A life of PhD: is it feasible?

Print "N NE E SE S SW W NW"

What does this line mean in Zelazny's The Courts of Chaos?

Was the Lonely Mountain, where Smaug lived, a volcano?

Can an open source licence be revoked if it violates employer's IP?

ISP is not hashing the password I log in with online. Should I take any action?

How to represent jealousy in a cute way?

Why is my Taiyaki (Cake that looks like a fish) too hard and dry?

Is there a radar system monitoring the UK mainland border?

Is Jesus the last Prophet?

Is it advisable to add a location heads-up when a scene changes in a novel?

In The Incredibles 2, why does Screenslaver's name use a pun on something that doesn't exist in the 1950s pastiche?

What publication claimed that Michael Jackson died in a nuclear holocaust?

Is it possible to have battery technology that can't be duplicated?

What is the source of 'Ma'alin bekodesh'?

What is the theme of analysis?

How can powerful telekinesis avoid violating Newton's 3rd Law?

Why would a car salesman tell me not to get my credit pulled again?

When editor does not respond to the request for withdrawal

Purpose of cylindrical attachments on Power Transmission towers

Can I use 220 V outlets on a 15 ampere breaker and wire it up as 110 V?

Approach sick days in feedback meeting



Can an escape pod land on Earth from orbit and not be immediately detected?


Would it be possible to shift Titan from its current orbit into an orbit around Earth for terraforming purposes?reasonable travel time from high earth orbit to earth/sun L4/L5 (IT restrictive world)Can you shoot someone with a bullet… from orbit?Can you catch a fish with a fishing rod… from orbit?Can I use my earth-changing invention to hide in orbit?How to escape from a small super-earth?Can sunflares hit earth, and what are they?-Question from Maze Runner seriesCan my spaceship figure out its position using Cepheid Variables?Big moon, small planet - can an earth sized moon orbit a moon sized planet?How would the transfer of mass from the Moon to Earth change the rotation, orbit and speed of the Moon and Earth?













4












$begingroup$


I'm writing a soft scifi novel that has its fair share "fi" but every now and then I feel it important to acknowledge some "sci." In this scenario, a spaceship is in orbit and about to land on Earth. It's also in communication with Earth, and under observation. But some characters want to "abandon ship" and land on Earth undetected -- or at least have a head start before they're detected. I'd prefer not to use "cloaking" as an answer (though I'm not above that if it's the only option haha!) I was thinking they could board an escape pod and just "Indiana Jones" their way to Earth. But is this at all plausible in context of existing technology?



Edit: I was unclear about the nature of this spaceship. It's not alien tech; just super cutting edge (a cut above realistic, basically). There's wiggle room in it's capabilities, but I'd like to keep it as believable as possible.










share|improve this question









New contributor



cal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Are these pods built in features to the Space Ship? Also and I want to be really sure about this, the Ship is a reasonably modern day human built space craft and not relying on super science or alien tech in anyway?
    $endgroup$
    – hszmv
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How big is the pod, and what counts as "detected" ? We don't see small asteroids until they light up in the atmosphere; if your pod can "glide" and soft-land, and add in some stealth-radar coatings, it wouldn't be too hard to land in some remote location.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    One meter wide? Sure. Two meters? Most likely. Ten meters? Maybe. Fifty meters? No way. On the other hand, if it comes ballistic from deep space it may well be mistaken for a meteoroid.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hszmv, I edited my question; hopefully this clarifies for you. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – cal
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    So far, you've said that this is an "escape pod," not a purpose build "sneak pod." There will be no stealth features built in because the builders want it to be seen. The pods purpose is to be "step 1 of being rescued."
    $endgroup$
    – ShadoCat
    7 hours ago















4












$begingroup$


I'm writing a soft scifi novel that has its fair share "fi" but every now and then I feel it important to acknowledge some "sci." In this scenario, a spaceship is in orbit and about to land on Earth. It's also in communication with Earth, and under observation. But some characters want to "abandon ship" and land on Earth undetected -- or at least have a head start before they're detected. I'd prefer not to use "cloaking" as an answer (though I'm not above that if it's the only option haha!) I was thinking they could board an escape pod and just "Indiana Jones" their way to Earth. But is this at all plausible in context of existing technology?



Edit: I was unclear about the nature of this spaceship. It's not alien tech; just super cutting edge (a cut above realistic, basically). There's wiggle room in it's capabilities, but I'd like to keep it as believable as possible.










share|improve this question









New contributor



cal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Are these pods built in features to the Space Ship? Also and I want to be really sure about this, the Ship is a reasonably modern day human built space craft and not relying on super science or alien tech in anyway?
    $endgroup$
    – hszmv
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How big is the pod, and what counts as "detected" ? We don't see small asteroids until they light up in the atmosphere; if your pod can "glide" and soft-land, and add in some stealth-radar coatings, it wouldn't be too hard to land in some remote location.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    One meter wide? Sure. Two meters? Most likely. Ten meters? Maybe. Fifty meters? No way. On the other hand, if it comes ballistic from deep space it may well be mistaken for a meteoroid.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hszmv, I edited my question; hopefully this clarifies for you. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – cal
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    So far, you've said that this is an "escape pod," not a purpose build "sneak pod." There will be no stealth features built in because the builders want it to be seen. The pods purpose is to be "step 1 of being rescued."
    $endgroup$
    – ShadoCat
    7 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


I'm writing a soft scifi novel that has its fair share "fi" but every now and then I feel it important to acknowledge some "sci." In this scenario, a spaceship is in orbit and about to land on Earth. It's also in communication with Earth, and under observation. But some characters want to "abandon ship" and land on Earth undetected -- or at least have a head start before they're detected. I'd prefer not to use "cloaking" as an answer (though I'm not above that if it's the only option haha!) I was thinking they could board an escape pod and just "Indiana Jones" their way to Earth. But is this at all plausible in context of existing technology?



Edit: I was unclear about the nature of this spaceship. It's not alien tech; just super cutting edge (a cut above realistic, basically). There's wiggle room in it's capabilities, but I'd like to keep it as believable as possible.










share|improve this question









New contributor



cal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




I'm writing a soft scifi novel that has its fair share "fi" but every now and then I feel it important to acknowledge some "sci." In this scenario, a spaceship is in orbit and about to land on Earth. It's also in communication with Earth, and under observation. But some characters want to "abandon ship" and land on Earth undetected -- or at least have a head start before they're detected. I'd prefer not to use "cloaking" as an answer (though I'm not above that if it's the only option haha!) I was thinking they could board an escape pod and just "Indiana Jones" their way to Earth. But is this at all plausible in context of existing technology?



Edit: I was unclear about the nature of this spaceship. It's not alien tech; just super cutting edge (a cut above realistic, basically). There's wiggle room in it's capabilities, but I'd like to keep it as believable as possible.







science-based space






share|improve this question









New contributor



cal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



cal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago







cal













New contributor



cal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









calcal

213




213




New contributor



cal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




cal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • $begingroup$
    Are these pods built in features to the Space Ship? Also and I want to be really sure about this, the Ship is a reasonably modern day human built space craft and not relying on super science or alien tech in anyway?
    $endgroup$
    – hszmv
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How big is the pod, and what counts as "detected" ? We don't see small asteroids until they light up in the atmosphere; if your pod can "glide" and soft-land, and add in some stealth-radar coatings, it wouldn't be too hard to land in some remote location.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    One meter wide? Sure. Two meters? Most likely. Ten meters? Maybe. Fifty meters? No way. On the other hand, if it comes ballistic from deep space it may well be mistaken for a meteoroid.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hszmv, I edited my question; hopefully this clarifies for you. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – cal
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    So far, you've said that this is an "escape pod," not a purpose build "sneak pod." There will be no stealth features built in because the builders want it to be seen. The pods purpose is to be "step 1 of being rescued."
    $endgroup$
    – ShadoCat
    7 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Are these pods built in features to the Space Ship? Also and I want to be really sure about this, the Ship is a reasonably modern day human built space craft and not relying on super science or alien tech in anyway?
    $endgroup$
    – hszmv
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How big is the pod, and what counts as "detected" ? We don't see small asteroids until they light up in the atmosphere; if your pod can "glide" and soft-land, and add in some stealth-radar coatings, it wouldn't be too hard to land in some remote location.
    $endgroup$
    – Carl Witthoft
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    One meter wide? Sure. Two meters? Most likely. Ten meters? Maybe. Fifty meters? No way. On the other hand, if it comes ballistic from deep space it may well be mistaken for a meteoroid.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Hszmv, I edited my question; hopefully this clarifies for you. Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – cal
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    So far, you've said that this is an "escape pod," not a purpose build "sneak pod." There will be no stealth features built in because the builders want it to be seen. The pods purpose is to be "step 1 of being rescued."
    $endgroup$
    – ShadoCat
    7 hours ago















$begingroup$
Are these pods built in features to the Space Ship? Also and I want to be really sure about this, the Ship is a reasonably modern day human built space craft and not relying on super science or alien tech in anyway?
$endgroup$
– hszmv
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are these pods built in features to the Space Ship? Also and I want to be really sure about this, the Ship is a reasonably modern day human built space craft and not relying on super science or alien tech in anyway?
$endgroup$
– hszmv
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
How big is the pod, and what counts as "detected" ? We don't see small asteroids until they light up in the atmosphere; if your pod can "glide" and soft-land, and add in some stealth-radar coatings, it wouldn't be too hard to land in some remote location.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
How big is the pod, and what counts as "detected" ? We don't see small asteroids until they light up in the atmosphere; if your pod can "glide" and soft-land, and add in some stealth-radar coatings, it wouldn't be too hard to land in some remote location.
$endgroup$
– Carl Witthoft
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
One meter wide? Sure. Two meters? Most likely. Ten meters? Maybe. Fifty meters? No way. On the other hand, if it comes ballistic from deep space it may well be mistaken for a meteoroid.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
One meter wide? Sure. Two meters? Most likely. Ten meters? Maybe. Fifty meters? No way. On the other hand, if it comes ballistic from deep space it may well be mistaken for a meteoroid.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Hszmv, I edited my question; hopefully this clarifies for you. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– cal
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Hszmv, I edited my question; hopefully this clarifies for you. Thanks!
$endgroup$
– cal
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
So far, you've said that this is an "escape pod," not a purpose build "sneak pod." There will be no stealth features built in because the builders want it to be seen. The pods purpose is to be "step 1 of being rescued."
$endgroup$
– ShadoCat
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
So far, you've said that this is an "escape pod," not a purpose build "sneak pod." There will be no stealth features built in because the builders want it to be seen. The pods purpose is to be "step 1 of being rescued."
$endgroup$
– ShadoCat
7 hours ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$


  • Is the ship under observation for routine traffic control or other purposes?

    If people on Earth are serious about watching, and if they are already observing the ship, breaking contact will be difficult. Aircraft like the Cobra Ball or Cobra Eye might be deployed to fill gaps in the ground coverage.

    If it is routine, Earth might rely on secondary radar and transponder, and a non-transponding pod has much better chances.


  • Are Earth nations cooperating?

    Large parts of Earth are governed by nations without sophisticated air defenses.


  • Is the capsule stealthy or deliberately visible?

    An emergency escape capsule may be designed with colorful parachutes, automatic and redundant transponders, dye markers in case of water landing, etc.


  • Consider historical lost aircraft cases.
    Steve Fossett got lost in a small aircraft over the United States, a country with quite sophisticated air traffic control. MH370 was even larger, but over the ocean.

    On the other hand, a reentry with aerobraking means a visible trail. North Korean missile tests were visible to civilians in Japan.





share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    Putting aside whether the "escape pod" has enough delta-V to break orbit, depending where they reenter it's very possible. I'd put the mother craft in a polar orbit, so they can reenter over the extreme southern Pacific, near the "pole of inaccessibility", and pass over Antarctica during the hottest part of the trip, then land in the extreme southern Atlantic near Elephant Island. With good timing (put the Pacific part during daylight, ideally near local noon), they might be visually seen by as few as several hundred people -- most of whom are in no position to immediately report the "bright meteor" passing near them.



    No, not a convenient location, but one might be able to push it as far north as the Falklands (to have a nearby airport), since the last part of the landing isn't very visual -- land in the dark with a no-longer-meteoric spaceship, even large parachutes might go completely unnoticed.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Thanks a lot! I edited my question, as I forgot to add that the ship would be under observation from Earth.
      $endgroup$
      – cal
      8 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      There are probably some ways to decrease the net brightness. An ablative hull that kept the temperature lower would dump heat at the expense of leaving a lot of stuff in a trail. As well, entering at a time when the sun is in people's eyes. Also, using a pod with very little radar signature will help. Also, some jim-jam to convince people you are still aboard, such as relayed signals or recordings or such.
      $endgroup$
      – puppetsock
      7 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      There's poor radar coverage south of Hawaii -- virtually nothing pointed at the sky that could see an orbiting craft. Reenter at noon and virtually no one will see, and over Antarctica, there's virtually no one to see.
      $endgroup$
      – Zeiss Ikon
      7 hours ago


















    2












    $begingroup$

    It's going to be very difficult to remain undetected. In fact, it's possible to see the dragon space capsule, which a reasonable size for the escape capsule, with naked eyes alone. Amateur satellite trackers could very well see the separation or the fact that there are two objects where there is supposed to be one and report it on twitter. Military/traffic control space surveillance systems radars could also detect that there are two objects when there is supposed to be one and immediately call up the people aboard said spacecraft to ask them what's going on. A super cutting edge spacecraft or one with people on it is likely to be a prime target for space surveillance. Space surveillance is likely to become more important as space technology advances.



    However, the US's current space surveillance network does not have extensive coverage though, there is minimal coverage in the southern hemisphere. A hand wave for detection by large government space surveillance radars is that they may not wish to reveal how good their radar systems are, so they may delay reporting of the separation. A bigger problem is keeping the escape pod separation secret from those onboard. This will create lots of sound and change the mass of spacecraft. The change in mass will be immediately apparent as soon as the spacecraft maneuvers.



    There are other ways for the characters to abandon ship discreetly even if the escape pod is detected. One is to make an unscheduled delivery to earth. We may have some refrigerator fail necessitating an experiment or extremely valuable medicine to be returned to earth before it gets too hot. One of the spacecraft's engine's could have an 'accident' meaning the escape pod has to be ejected so that the spacecraft can safely land. The spacecraft may dispose of some garbage before landing using a now unnecessary escape pod.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      2












      $begingroup$

      If I remember my sci-fi correctly, I think one of the more accepted methods of doing this is using the 'hide a tree in a forest method'. In other words, just hide the escape pod within a meteor shower, and use atypical methods, such as deploying the equivalent of a BASE parachute at the last possible moment, or something of that nature.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        1












        $begingroup$

        One other way to get in undetected would be to shoot a great big empty escape pod slowly over an area that is heavily covered in radars, and then send a small pod down somewhere remote. The first escape pod would attract all the attention of the satellites and radars, and they might not notice a little tiny blip off in some dark corner.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor



        Einstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        $endgroup$













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "579"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          cal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148755%2fcan-an-escape-pod-land-on-earth-from-orbit-and-not-be-immediately-detected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4












          $begingroup$


          • Is the ship under observation for routine traffic control or other purposes?

            If people on Earth are serious about watching, and if they are already observing the ship, breaking contact will be difficult. Aircraft like the Cobra Ball or Cobra Eye might be deployed to fill gaps in the ground coverage.

            If it is routine, Earth might rely on secondary radar and transponder, and a non-transponding pod has much better chances.


          • Are Earth nations cooperating?

            Large parts of Earth are governed by nations without sophisticated air defenses.


          • Is the capsule stealthy or deliberately visible?

            An emergency escape capsule may be designed with colorful parachutes, automatic and redundant transponders, dye markers in case of water landing, etc.


          • Consider historical lost aircraft cases.
            Steve Fossett got lost in a small aircraft over the United States, a country with quite sophisticated air traffic control. MH370 was even larger, but over the ocean.

            On the other hand, a reentry with aerobraking means a visible trail. North Korean missile tests were visible to civilians in Japan.





          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$

















            4












            $begingroup$


            • Is the ship under observation for routine traffic control or other purposes?

              If people on Earth are serious about watching, and if they are already observing the ship, breaking contact will be difficult. Aircraft like the Cobra Ball or Cobra Eye might be deployed to fill gaps in the ground coverage.

              If it is routine, Earth might rely on secondary radar and transponder, and a non-transponding pod has much better chances.


            • Are Earth nations cooperating?

              Large parts of Earth are governed by nations without sophisticated air defenses.


            • Is the capsule stealthy or deliberately visible?

              An emergency escape capsule may be designed with colorful parachutes, automatic and redundant transponders, dye markers in case of water landing, etc.


            • Consider historical lost aircraft cases.
              Steve Fossett got lost in a small aircraft over the United States, a country with quite sophisticated air traffic control. MH370 was even larger, but over the ocean.

              On the other hand, a reentry with aerobraking means a visible trail. North Korean missile tests were visible to civilians in Japan.





            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$















              4












              4








              4





              $begingroup$


              • Is the ship under observation for routine traffic control or other purposes?

                If people on Earth are serious about watching, and if they are already observing the ship, breaking contact will be difficult. Aircraft like the Cobra Ball or Cobra Eye might be deployed to fill gaps in the ground coverage.

                If it is routine, Earth might rely on secondary radar and transponder, and a non-transponding pod has much better chances.


              • Are Earth nations cooperating?

                Large parts of Earth are governed by nations without sophisticated air defenses.


              • Is the capsule stealthy or deliberately visible?

                An emergency escape capsule may be designed with colorful parachutes, automatic and redundant transponders, dye markers in case of water landing, etc.


              • Consider historical lost aircraft cases.
                Steve Fossett got lost in a small aircraft over the United States, a country with quite sophisticated air traffic control. MH370 was even larger, but over the ocean.

                On the other hand, a reentry with aerobraking means a visible trail. North Korean missile tests were visible to civilians in Japan.





              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$




              • Is the ship under observation for routine traffic control or other purposes?

                If people on Earth are serious about watching, and if they are already observing the ship, breaking contact will be difficult. Aircraft like the Cobra Ball or Cobra Eye might be deployed to fill gaps in the ground coverage.

                If it is routine, Earth might rely on secondary radar and transponder, and a non-transponding pod has much better chances.


              • Are Earth nations cooperating?

                Large parts of Earth are governed by nations without sophisticated air defenses.


              • Is the capsule stealthy or deliberately visible?

                An emergency escape capsule may be designed with colorful parachutes, automatic and redundant transponders, dye markers in case of water landing, etc.


              • Consider historical lost aircraft cases.
                Steve Fossett got lost in a small aircraft over the United States, a country with quite sophisticated air traffic control. MH370 was even larger, but over the ocean.

                On the other hand, a reentry with aerobraking means a visible trail. North Korean missile tests were visible to civilians in Japan.






              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered 7 hours ago









              o.m.o.m.

              65.6k797216




              65.6k797216





















                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  Putting aside whether the "escape pod" has enough delta-V to break orbit, depending where they reenter it's very possible. I'd put the mother craft in a polar orbit, so they can reenter over the extreme southern Pacific, near the "pole of inaccessibility", and pass over Antarctica during the hottest part of the trip, then land in the extreme southern Atlantic near Elephant Island. With good timing (put the Pacific part during daylight, ideally near local noon), they might be visually seen by as few as several hundred people -- most of whom are in no position to immediately report the "bright meteor" passing near them.



                  No, not a convenient location, but one might be able to push it as far north as the Falklands (to have a nearby airport), since the last part of the landing isn't very visual -- land in the dark with a no-longer-meteoric spaceship, even large parachutes might go completely unnoticed.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$












                  • $begingroup$
                    Thanks a lot! I edited my question, as I forgot to add that the ship would be under observation from Earth.
                    $endgroup$
                    – cal
                    8 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    There are probably some ways to decrease the net brightness. An ablative hull that kept the temperature lower would dump heat at the expense of leaving a lot of stuff in a trail. As well, entering at a time when the sun is in people's eyes. Also, using a pod with very little radar signature will help. Also, some jim-jam to convince people you are still aboard, such as relayed signals or recordings or such.
                    $endgroup$
                    – puppetsock
                    7 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    There's poor radar coverage south of Hawaii -- virtually nothing pointed at the sky that could see an orbiting craft. Reenter at noon and virtually no one will see, and over Antarctica, there's virtually no one to see.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Zeiss Ikon
                    7 hours ago















                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  Putting aside whether the "escape pod" has enough delta-V to break orbit, depending where they reenter it's very possible. I'd put the mother craft in a polar orbit, so they can reenter over the extreme southern Pacific, near the "pole of inaccessibility", and pass over Antarctica during the hottest part of the trip, then land in the extreme southern Atlantic near Elephant Island. With good timing (put the Pacific part during daylight, ideally near local noon), they might be visually seen by as few as several hundred people -- most of whom are in no position to immediately report the "bright meteor" passing near them.



                  No, not a convenient location, but one might be able to push it as far north as the Falklands (to have a nearby airport), since the last part of the landing isn't very visual -- land in the dark with a no-longer-meteoric spaceship, even large parachutes might go completely unnoticed.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$












                  • $begingroup$
                    Thanks a lot! I edited my question, as I forgot to add that the ship would be under observation from Earth.
                    $endgroup$
                    – cal
                    8 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    There are probably some ways to decrease the net brightness. An ablative hull that kept the temperature lower would dump heat at the expense of leaving a lot of stuff in a trail. As well, entering at a time when the sun is in people's eyes. Also, using a pod with very little radar signature will help. Also, some jim-jam to convince people you are still aboard, such as relayed signals or recordings or such.
                    $endgroup$
                    – puppetsock
                    7 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    There's poor radar coverage south of Hawaii -- virtually nothing pointed at the sky that could see an orbiting craft. Reenter at noon and virtually no one will see, and over Antarctica, there's virtually no one to see.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Zeiss Ikon
                    7 hours ago













                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  Putting aside whether the "escape pod" has enough delta-V to break orbit, depending where they reenter it's very possible. I'd put the mother craft in a polar orbit, so they can reenter over the extreme southern Pacific, near the "pole of inaccessibility", and pass over Antarctica during the hottest part of the trip, then land in the extreme southern Atlantic near Elephant Island. With good timing (put the Pacific part during daylight, ideally near local noon), they might be visually seen by as few as several hundred people -- most of whom are in no position to immediately report the "bright meteor" passing near them.



                  No, not a convenient location, but one might be able to push it as far north as the Falklands (to have a nearby airport), since the last part of the landing isn't very visual -- land in the dark with a no-longer-meteoric spaceship, even large parachutes might go completely unnoticed.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Putting aside whether the "escape pod" has enough delta-V to break orbit, depending where they reenter it's very possible. I'd put the mother craft in a polar orbit, so they can reenter over the extreme southern Pacific, near the "pole of inaccessibility", and pass over Antarctica during the hottest part of the trip, then land in the extreme southern Atlantic near Elephant Island. With good timing (put the Pacific part during daylight, ideally near local noon), they might be visually seen by as few as several hundred people -- most of whom are in no position to immediately report the "bright meteor" passing near them.



                  No, not a convenient location, but one might be able to push it as far north as the Falklands (to have a nearby airport), since the last part of the landing isn't very visual -- land in the dark with a no-longer-meteoric spaceship, even large parachutes might go completely unnoticed.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  Zeiss IkonZeiss Ikon

                  5,251926




                  5,251926











                  • $begingroup$
                    Thanks a lot! I edited my question, as I forgot to add that the ship would be under observation from Earth.
                    $endgroup$
                    – cal
                    8 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    There are probably some ways to decrease the net brightness. An ablative hull that kept the temperature lower would dump heat at the expense of leaving a lot of stuff in a trail. As well, entering at a time when the sun is in people's eyes. Also, using a pod with very little radar signature will help. Also, some jim-jam to convince people you are still aboard, such as relayed signals or recordings or such.
                    $endgroup$
                    – puppetsock
                    7 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    There's poor radar coverage south of Hawaii -- virtually nothing pointed at the sky that could see an orbiting craft. Reenter at noon and virtually no one will see, and over Antarctica, there's virtually no one to see.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Zeiss Ikon
                    7 hours ago
















                  • $begingroup$
                    Thanks a lot! I edited my question, as I forgot to add that the ship would be under observation from Earth.
                    $endgroup$
                    – cal
                    8 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    There are probably some ways to decrease the net brightness. An ablative hull that kept the temperature lower would dump heat at the expense of leaving a lot of stuff in a trail. As well, entering at a time when the sun is in people's eyes. Also, using a pod with very little radar signature will help. Also, some jim-jam to convince people you are still aboard, such as relayed signals or recordings or such.
                    $endgroup$
                    – puppetsock
                    7 hours ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    There's poor radar coverage south of Hawaii -- virtually nothing pointed at the sky that could see an orbiting craft. Reenter at noon and virtually no one will see, and over Antarctica, there's virtually no one to see.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Zeiss Ikon
                    7 hours ago















                  $begingroup$
                  Thanks a lot! I edited my question, as I forgot to add that the ship would be under observation from Earth.
                  $endgroup$
                  – cal
                  8 hours ago




                  $begingroup$
                  Thanks a lot! I edited my question, as I forgot to add that the ship would be under observation from Earth.
                  $endgroup$
                  – cal
                  8 hours ago












                  $begingroup$
                  There are probably some ways to decrease the net brightness. An ablative hull that kept the temperature lower would dump heat at the expense of leaving a lot of stuff in a trail. As well, entering at a time when the sun is in people's eyes. Also, using a pod with very little radar signature will help. Also, some jim-jam to convince people you are still aboard, such as relayed signals or recordings or such.
                  $endgroup$
                  – puppetsock
                  7 hours ago




                  $begingroup$
                  There are probably some ways to decrease the net brightness. An ablative hull that kept the temperature lower would dump heat at the expense of leaving a lot of stuff in a trail. As well, entering at a time when the sun is in people's eyes. Also, using a pod with very little radar signature will help. Also, some jim-jam to convince people you are still aboard, such as relayed signals or recordings or such.
                  $endgroup$
                  – puppetsock
                  7 hours ago












                  $begingroup$
                  There's poor radar coverage south of Hawaii -- virtually nothing pointed at the sky that could see an orbiting craft. Reenter at noon and virtually no one will see, and over Antarctica, there's virtually no one to see.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Zeiss Ikon
                  7 hours ago




                  $begingroup$
                  There's poor radar coverage south of Hawaii -- virtually nothing pointed at the sky that could see an orbiting craft. Reenter at noon and virtually no one will see, and over Antarctica, there's virtually no one to see.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Zeiss Ikon
                  7 hours ago











                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  It's going to be very difficult to remain undetected. In fact, it's possible to see the dragon space capsule, which a reasonable size for the escape capsule, with naked eyes alone. Amateur satellite trackers could very well see the separation or the fact that there are two objects where there is supposed to be one and report it on twitter. Military/traffic control space surveillance systems radars could also detect that there are two objects when there is supposed to be one and immediately call up the people aboard said spacecraft to ask them what's going on. A super cutting edge spacecraft or one with people on it is likely to be a prime target for space surveillance. Space surveillance is likely to become more important as space technology advances.



                  However, the US's current space surveillance network does not have extensive coverage though, there is minimal coverage in the southern hemisphere. A hand wave for detection by large government space surveillance radars is that they may not wish to reveal how good their radar systems are, so they may delay reporting of the separation. A bigger problem is keeping the escape pod separation secret from those onboard. This will create lots of sound and change the mass of spacecraft. The change in mass will be immediately apparent as soon as the spacecraft maneuvers.



                  There are other ways for the characters to abandon ship discreetly even if the escape pod is detected. One is to make an unscheduled delivery to earth. We may have some refrigerator fail necessitating an experiment or extremely valuable medicine to be returned to earth before it gets too hot. One of the spacecraft's engine's could have an 'accident' meaning the escape pod has to be ejected so that the spacecraft can safely land. The spacecraft may dispose of some garbage before landing using a now unnecessary escape pod.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$

















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    It's going to be very difficult to remain undetected. In fact, it's possible to see the dragon space capsule, which a reasonable size for the escape capsule, with naked eyes alone. Amateur satellite trackers could very well see the separation or the fact that there are two objects where there is supposed to be one and report it on twitter. Military/traffic control space surveillance systems radars could also detect that there are two objects when there is supposed to be one and immediately call up the people aboard said spacecraft to ask them what's going on. A super cutting edge spacecraft or one with people on it is likely to be a prime target for space surveillance. Space surveillance is likely to become more important as space technology advances.



                    However, the US's current space surveillance network does not have extensive coverage though, there is minimal coverage in the southern hemisphere. A hand wave for detection by large government space surveillance radars is that they may not wish to reveal how good their radar systems are, so they may delay reporting of the separation. A bigger problem is keeping the escape pod separation secret from those onboard. This will create lots of sound and change the mass of spacecraft. The change in mass will be immediately apparent as soon as the spacecraft maneuvers.



                    There are other ways for the characters to abandon ship discreetly even if the escape pod is detected. One is to make an unscheduled delivery to earth. We may have some refrigerator fail necessitating an experiment or extremely valuable medicine to be returned to earth before it gets too hot. One of the spacecraft's engine's could have an 'accident' meaning the escape pod has to be ejected so that the spacecraft can safely land. The spacecraft may dispose of some garbage before landing using a now unnecessary escape pod.






                    share|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$















                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      It's going to be very difficult to remain undetected. In fact, it's possible to see the dragon space capsule, which a reasonable size for the escape capsule, with naked eyes alone. Amateur satellite trackers could very well see the separation or the fact that there are two objects where there is supposed to be one and report it on twitter. Military/traffic control space surveillance systems radars could also detect that there are two objects when there is supposed to be one and immediately call up the people aboard said spacecraft to ask them what's going on. A super cutting edge spacecraft or one with people on it is likely to be a prime target for space surveillance. Space surveillance is likely to become more important as space technology advances.



                      However, the US's current space surveillance network does not have extensive coverage though, there is minimal coverage in the southern hemisphere. A hand wave for detection by large government space surveillance radars is that they may not wish to reveal how good their radar systems are, so they may delay reporting of the separation. A bigger problem is keeping the escape pod separation secret from those onboard. This will create lots of sound and change the mass of spacecraft. The change in mass will be immediately apparent as soon as the spacecraft maneuvers.



                      There are other ways for the characters to abandon ship discreetly even if the escape pod is detected. One is to make an unscheduled delivery to earth. We may have some refrigerator fail necessitating an experiment or extremely valuable medicine to be returned to earth before it gets too hot. One of the spacecraft's engine's could have an 'accident' meaning the escape pod has to be ejected so that the spacecraft can safely land. The spacecraft may dispose of some garbage before landing using a now unnecessary escape pod.






                      share|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      It's going to be very difficult to remain undetected. In fact, it's possible to see the dragon space capsule, which a reasonable size for the escape capsule, with naked eyes alone. Amateur satellite trackers could very well see the separation or the fact that there are two objects where there is supposed to be one and report it on twitter. Military/traffic control space surveillance systems radars could also detect that there are two objects when there is supposed to be one and immediately call up the people aboard said spacecraft to ask them what's going on. A super cutting edge spacecraft or one with people on it is likely to be a prime target for space surveillance. Space surveillance is likely to become more important as space technology advances.



                      However, the US's current space surveillance network does not have extensive coverage though, there is minimal coverage in the southern hemisphere. A hand wave for detection by large government space surveillance radars is that they may not wish to reveal how good their radar systems are, so they may delay reporting of the separation. A bigger problem is keeping the escape pod separation secret from those onboard. This will create lots of sound and change the mass of spacecraft. The change in mass will be immediately apparent as soon as the spacecraft maneuvers.



                      There are other ways for the characters to abandon ship discreetly even if the escape pod is detected. One is to make an unscheduled delivery to earth. We may have some refrigerator fail necessitating an experiment or extremely valuable medicine to be returned to earth before it gets too hot. One of the spacecraft's engine's could have an 'accident' meaning the escape pod has to be ejected so that the spacecraft can safely land. The spacecraft may dispose of some garbage before landing using a now unnecessary escape pod.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered 7 hours ago









                      EstimatorNoiselessEstimatorNoiseless

                      65534




                      65534





















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          If I remember my sci-fi correctly, I think one of the more accepted methods of doing this is using the 'hide a tree in a forest method'. In other words, just hide the escape pod within a meteor shower, and use atypical methods, such as deploying the equivalent of a BASE parachute at the last possible moment, or something of that nature.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            2












                            $begingroup$

                            If I remember my sci-fi correctly, I think one of the more accepted methods of doing this is using the 'hide a tree in a forest method'. In other words, just hide the escape pod within a meteor shower, and use atypical methods, such as deploying the equivalent of a BASE parachute at the last possible moment, or something of that nature.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              2












                              2








                              2





                              $begingroup$

                              If I remember my sci-fi correctly, I think one of the more accepted methods of doing this is using the 'hide a tree in a forest method'. In other words, just hide the escape pod within a meteor shower, and use atypical methods, such as deploying the equivalent of a BASE parachute at the last possible moment, or something of that nature.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              If I remember my sci-fi correctly, I think one of the more accepted methods of doing this is using the 'hide a tree in a forest method'. In other words, just hide the escape pod within a meteor shower, and use atypical methods, such as deploying the equivalent of a BASE parachute at the last possible moment, or something of that nature.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 6 hours ago









                              HalfthawedHalfthawed

                              1,561114




                              1,561114





















                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  One other way to get in undetected would be to shoot a great big empty escape pod slowly over an area that is heavily covered in radars, and then send a small pod down somewhere remote. The first escape pod would attract all the attention of the satellites and radars, and they might not notice a little tiny blip off in some dark corner.






                                  share|improve this answer








                                  New contributor



                                  Einstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                  $endgroup$

















                                    1












                                    $begingroup$

                                    One other way to get in undetected would be to shoot a great big empty escape pod slowly over an area that is heavily covered in radars, and then send a small pod down somewhere remote. The first escape pod would attract all the attention of the satellites and radars, and they might not notice a little tiny blip off in some dark corner.






                                    share|improve this answer








                                    New contributor



                                    Einstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                    $endgroup$















                                      1












                                      1








                                      1





                                      $begingroup$

                                      One other way to get in undetected would be to shoot a great big empty escape pod slowly over an area that is heavily covered in radars, and then send a small pod down somewhere remote. The first escape pod would attract all the attention of the satellites and radars, and they might not notice a little tiny blip off in some dark corner.






                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor



                                      Einstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                      $endgroup$



                                      One other way to get in undetected would be to shoot a great big empty escape pod slowly over an area that is heavily covered in radars, and then send a small pod down somewhere remote. The first escape pod would attract all the attention of the satellites and radars, and they might not notice a little tiny blip off in some dark corner.







                                      share|improve this answer








                                      New contributor



                                      Einstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer






                                      New contributor



                                      Einstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.








                                      answered 7 hours ago









                                      EinsteinEinstein

                                      212




                                      212




                                      New contributor



                                      Einstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.




                                      New contributor




                                      Einstein is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                          cal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded


















                                          cal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                          cal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                          cal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148755%2fcan-an-escape-pod-land-on-earth-from-orbit-and-not-be-immediately-detected%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                                          Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                                          19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу