Is this equation correct? And if so, is this famous?How to Proceed in Solving this EquationUniform convergence and interchanging limitOn the limit: $,lim_small xtoinftyleft[(x+1)^smallalpha-x^smallalpha-alpha,x^smallalpha-1right],$Theorem 6.16 in Baby Rudin: Is this theorem also valid for vector valued functions?Prob. 8, Chap. 6, in Baby Rudin: The Integral Test for Convergence of SeriesProb. 16, Chap. 6, in Baby Rudin: Some Properties of Riemann Zeta FucntionIf $f$ is non-negative and $sum_k=-infty^k=infty2^kpomega(2^k)<infty$ then $f$ is in $L^p(mathbb R^n)$Prove that $fracsin(x)1+$ is not Lebesgue integrableOn the integral $int_0^pi/2 fracx log left ( 1-sin x right )sin x , mathrmdx$A limit of an integral of a quotient related to fractional Sobolev space

What publication claimed that Michael Jackson died in a nuclear holocaust?

Approach sick days in feedback meeting

Can a 40amp breaker be used safely and without issue with a 40amp device on 6AWG wire?

Can an open source licence be revoked if it violates employer's IP?

How long would it take for sucrose to undergo hydrolysis in boiling water?

Fastest way from 10 to 1 with everyone in between

Must a CPU have a GPU if the motherboard provides a display port (when there isn't any separate video card)?

How can this shape perfectly cover a cube?

Why is C++ template use not recommended in space/radiated environment?

How to search for Android apps without ads?

Using if statement with ArcPy and GetCount?

Should I email my professor to clear up a (possibly very irrelevant) awkward misunderstanding?

Should I worry about having my credit pulled multiple times while car shopping?

Is it possible to install Firefox on Ubuntu with no desktop enviroment?

Can Mage Hand be used to indirectly trigger an attack?

Intersect multiple layers at once QGIS

Will users know a CardView is clickable

How can I find out about the game world without meta-influencing it?

Does an African-American baby born in Youngstown, Ohio have a higher infant mortality rate than a baby born in Iran?

Why does there seem to be an extreme lack of public trashcans in Taiwan?

Am I being scammed by a sugar daddy?

Co-worker is now managing my team, does this mean that I'm being demoted?

What does this circuit symbol mean?

In The Incredibles 2, why does Screenslaver's name use a pun on something that doesn't exist in the 1950s pastiche?



Is this equation correct? And if so, is this famous?


How to Proceed in Solving this EquationUniform convergence and interchanging limitOn the limit: $,lim_small xtoinftyleft[(x+1)^smallalpha-x^smallalpha-alpha,x^smallalpha-1right],$Theorem 6.16 in Baby Rudin: Is this theorem also valid for vector valued functions?Prob. 8, Chap. 6, in Baby Rudin: The Integral Test for Convergence of SeriesProb. 16, Chap. 6, in Baby Rudin: Some Properties of Riemann Zeta FucntionIf $f$ is non-negative and $sum_k=-infty^k=infty2^kpomega(2^k)<infty$ then $f$ is in $L^p(mathbb R^n)$Prove that $fracsin(x)x$ is not Lebesgue integrableOn the integral $int_0^pi/2 fracx log left ( 1-sin x right )sin x , mathrmdx$A limit of an integral of a quotient related to fractional Sobolev space













5












$begingroup$



$$int_1^inftyx^n e^-xdx=frac1e sum_k=0^nfracn!(n-k)!$$




My proof.1



beginalign*
&int_1^infty e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = frace^-alphaalpha, \
&Rightarrow qquad int_1^infty (-x)^n e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = sum_k=0^n fracn!k!(n-k)! (-1)^k k! frac1alpha^k(-1)^n-ke^-alpha \
&Rightarrow qquad int_1^infty x^n e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)! frace^-alphaalpha^k.
endalign*

$alpha = 1$とすれば、
beginalign*
int_1^infty x^n e^-x , mathrmdx = frac1e sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)!.
endalign*

が成り立つ。 $blacksquare$




Original images: (1, 2)










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Starlight Road is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @StarlightRoad: I won't believe you unless you show that proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    19 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certainly $Gamma (z) = int_0^infty t^z-1 e^-t dt$ is a famous function, and yours is just slightly removed. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you justify the first implication ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you justify the first implication ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    18 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A slightly more general form of this integral is number 3.351.2 (with $u=mu=1$) on page 310 of Table of Integrals, Series, and Products by Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. The indefinite integral (from which yours can be derived) is number 521 on page 379 of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 24th edition.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    18 hours ago















5












$begingroup$



$$int_1^inftyx^n e^-xdx=frac1e sum_k=0^nfracn!(n-k)!$$




My proof.1



beginalign*
&int_1^infty e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = frace^-alphaalpha, \
&Rightarrow qquad int_1^infty (-x)^n e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = sum_k=0^n fracn!k!(n-k)! (-1)^k k! frac1alpha^k(-1)^n-ke^-alpha \
&Rightarrow qquad int_1^infty x^n e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)! frace^-alphaalpha^k.
endalign*

$alpha = 1$とすれば、
beginalign*
int_1^infty x^n e^-x , mathrmdx = frac1e sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)!.
endalign*

が成り立つ。 $blacksquare$




Original images: (1, 2)










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Starlight Road is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @StarlightRoad: I won't believe you unless you show that proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    19 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certainly $Gamma (z) = int_0^infty t^z-1 e^-t dt$ is a famous function, and yours is just slightly removed. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you justify the first implication ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you justify the first implication ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    18 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A slightly more general form of this integral is number 3.351.2 (with $u=mu=1$) on page 310 of Table of Integrals, Series, and Products by Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. The indefinite integral (from which yours can be derived) is number 521 on page 379 of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 24th edition.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    18 hours ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$



$$int_1^inftyx^n e^-xdx=frac1e sum_k=0^nfracn!(n-k)!$$




My proof.1



beginalign*
&int_1^infty e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = frace^-alphaalpha, \
&Rightarrow qquad int_1^infty (-x)^n e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = sum_k=0^n fracn!k!(n-k)! (-1)^k k! frac1alpha^k(-1)^n-ke^-alpha \
&Rightarrow qquad int_1^infty x^n e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)! frace^-alphaalpha^k.
endalign*

$alpha = 1$とすれば、
beginalign*
int_1^infty x^n e^-x , mathrmdx = frac1e sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)!.
endalign*

が成り立つ。 $blacksquare$




Original images: (1, 2)










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Starlight Road is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$





$$int_1^inftyx^n e^-xdx=frac1e sum_k=0^nfracn!(n-k)!$$




My proof.1



beginalign*
&int_1^infty e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = frace^-alphaalpha, \
&Rightarrow qquad int_1^infty (-x)^n e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = sum_k=0^n fracn!k!(n-k)! (-1)^k k! frac1alpha^k(-1)^n-ke^-alpha \
&Rightarrow qquad int_1^infty x^n e^-alpha x , mathrmdx = sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)! frace^-alphaalpha^k.
endalign*

$alpha = 1$とすれば、
beginalign*
int_1^infty x^n e^-x , mathrmdx = frac1e sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)!.
endalign*

が成り立つ。 $blacksquare$




Original images: (1, 2)







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Starlight Road is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



Starlight Road is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 18 hours ago







Starlight Road













New contributor



Starlight Road is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 19 hours ago









Starlight RoadStarlight Road

263




263




New contributor



Starlight Road is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Starlight Road is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @StarlightRoad: I won't believe you unless you show that proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    19 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certainly $Gamma (z) = int_0^infty t^z-1 e^-t dt$ is a famous function, and yours is just slightly removed. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you justify the first implication ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you justify the first implication ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    18 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A slightly more general form of this integral is number 3.351.2 (with $u=mu=1$) on page 310 of Table of Integrals, Series, and Products by Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. The indefinite integral (from which yours can be derived) is number 521 on page 379 of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 24th edition.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    18 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @StarlightRoad: I won't believe you unless you show that proof.
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    19 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Certainly $Gamma (z) = int_0^infty t^z-1 e^-t dt$ is a famous function, and yours is just slightly removed. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function
    $endgroup$
    – Doug M
    18 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you justify the first implication ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    18 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    How do you justify the first implication ?
    $endgroup$
    – Yves Daoust
    18 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    A slightly more general form of this integral is number 3.351.2 (with $u=mu=1$) on page 310 of Table of Integrals, Series, and Products by Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. The indefinite integral (from which yours can be derived) is number 521 on page 379 of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 24th edition.
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    18 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
@StarlightRoad: I won't believe you unless you show that proof.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
19 hours ago




$begingroup$
@StarlightRoad: I won't believe you unless you show that proof.
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
19 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Certainly $Gamma (z) = int_0^infty t^z-1 e^-t dt$ is a famous function, and yours is just slightly removed. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function
$endgroup$
– Doug M
18 hours ago





$begingroup$
Certainly $Gamma (z) = int_0^infty t^z-1 e^-t dt$ is a famous function, and yours is just slightly removed. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function
$endgroup$
– Doug M
18 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
How do you justify the first implication ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
18 hours ago




$begingroup$
How do you justify the first implication ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
18 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
How do you justify the first implication ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
18 hours ago




$begingroup$
How do you justify the first implication ?
$endgroup$
– Yves Daoust
18 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
A slightly more general form of this integral is number 3.351.2 (with $u=mu=1$) on page 310 of Table of Integrals, Series, and Products by Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. The indefinite integral (from which yours can be derived) is number 521 on page 379 of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 24th edition.
$endgroup$
– David K
18 hours ago




$begingroup$
A slightly more general form of this integral is number 3.351.2 (with $u=mu=1$) on page 310 of Table of Integrals, Series, and Products by Gradshteyn and Ryzhik. The indefinite integral (from which yours can be derived) is number 521 on page 379 of the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 24th edition.
$endgroup$
– David K
18 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

Is it famous? probalby not. Is it known? Yes.



In:

Gradshteyn and Rhyzik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products

formula 3.351.2 is
$$
int_u^infty x^n e^-mu x dx = e^-u mu sum_k=0^n fracn!k!;
fracu^kmu^n-k+1
$$

Now if you take $u=mu=1$ you get your formula.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    7












    $begingroup$

    It depends on what it means to be famous, but it is a quite well-known formula in probability theory. Indeed, let $X$ be the sum of $(n+1)$ i.i.d. $textExp(1)$ random variables. Then




    1. $X$ has the PDF $f_X(x) = (x^n e^-x / n!) mathbf1(x > 0)$, and so,



      $$ int_1^infty x^n e^-x , mathrmdx = n! ,mathbfP(X > 1). $$




    2. $X$ can be realized as the $(n+1)$-th arrival time of the Poisson process $N = (N_t)_tgeq 0$ with unit rate, and so,



      beginalign*
      mathbfP(X > 1)
      &= mathbfP(text$(n+1)$-th arrival has not occurred by time $1$) \
      &= mathbfP(textthere are at most $n$ arrivals by time $1$) \
      &= mathbfP(N(1) leq n) = sum_k=0^n frac1k!e^-1. endalign*



    Combining two observations proves the desired identity.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      It is true and changing the summation order results in a slightly different expression, which I find easier to prove:




      $int_1^infty x^n e^-xdx = frac1esum_k = 0^n fracn!k!$




      You can prove it by using induction and integration by parts:




      case n = 0:



      $int_1^infty x^0 e^-xdx = [-e^-x]_1^infty = 0 + frac1e = frac1e frac0!0!$



      step $n rightarrow n+1$:



      $int_1^infty x^n+1 e^-xdx = [-x^n+1e^-x]_1^infty + (n+1)int_1^infty x^n e^-xdx = frac1e + (n+1)left(frac1esum_k = 0^n fracn!k! right) = frac1e left(1 + sum_k = 0^n frac(n+1)!k!right) = frac1esum_k = 0^n+1 frac(n+1)!k!$







      share|cite|improve this answer










      New contributor



      otto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      $endgroup$




















        0












        $begingroup$

        This formula can be proven by simple induction.
        Note, that we can also start with $n=0$ since both sides evaluate to $frac1e$.
        [At first I stated this to be wrong for n=0.]



        For $n=1$ we conclude $int_1^infty x e^-x, dx=frac2e=frac1esum_k=0^1 frac1!(1-k)!$ with partial integration.



        The inductive step is done similary.



        We have:



        $int_1^infty x^n+1e^-x, dx =-e^xx^n|_1^infty+(n+1)int_1^infty e^-xx^n, dx$



        $=frac1e+(n+1)sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)!$. By the inductive claim.



        $=frac1e(1+sum_k=0^n frac(n+1)!(n-k)!)$



        With an index shift, we get:



        $=frac1e(1+sum_k=1^n+1 frac(n+1)!n-(k-1)!)$



        $=frac1esum_k=0^n+1frac(n+1)!(n+1-k)!$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          The equation still holds when $n=0$
          $endgroup$
          – Julian Mejia
          16 hours ago










        • $begingroup$
          @JulianMejia You are right. I edit that.
          $endgroup$
          – Cornman
          13 hours ago











        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Starlight Road is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3259696%2fis-this-equation-correct-and-if-so-is-this-famous%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        10












        $begingroup$

        Is it famous? probalby not. Is it known? Yes.



        In:

        Gradshteyn and Rhyzik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products

        formula 3.351.2 is
        $$
        int_u^infty x^n e^-mu x dx = e^-u mu sum_k=0^n fracn!k!;
        fracu^kmu^n-k+1
        $$

        Now if you take $u=mu=1$ you get your formula.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          10












          $begingroup$

          Is it famous? probalby not. Is it known? Yes.



          In:

          Gradshteyn and Rhyzik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products

          formula 3.351.2 is
          $$
          int_u^infty x^n e^-mu x dx = e^-u mu sum_k=0^n fracn!k!;
          fracu^kmu^n-k+1
          $$

          Now if you take $u=mu=1$ you get your formula.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            10












            10








            10





            $begingroup$

            Is it famous? probalby not. Is it known? Yes.



            In:

            Gradshteyn and Rhyzik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products

            formula 3.351.2 is
            $$
            int_u^infty x^n e^-mu x dx = e^-u mu sum_k=0^n fracn!k!;
            fracu^kmu^n-k+1
            $$

            Now if you take $u=mu=1$ you get your formula.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Is it famous? probalby not. Is it known? Yes.



            In:

            Gradshteyn and Rhyzik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products

            formula 3.351.2 is
            $$
            int_u^infty x^n e^-mu x dx = e^-u mu sum_k=0^n fracn!k!;
            fracu^kmu^n-k+1
            $$

            Now if you take $u=mu=1$ you get your formula.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 18 hours ago









            GEdgarGEdgar

            64.8k369183




            64.8k369183





















                7












                $begingroup$

                It depends on what it means to be famous, but it is a quite well-known formula in probability theory. Indeed, let $X$ be the sum of $(n+1)$ i.i.d. $textExp(1)$ random variables. Then




                1. $X$ has the PDF $f_X(x) = (x^n e^-x / n!) mathbf1(x > 0)$, and so,



                  $$ int_1^infty x^n e^-x , mathrmdx = n! ,mathbfP(X > 1). $$




                2. $X$ can be realized as the $(n+1)$-th arrival time of the Poisson process $N = (N_t)_tgeq 0$ with unit rate, and so,



                  beginalign*
                  mathbfP(X > 1)
                  &= mathbfP(text$(n+1)$-th arrival has not occurred by time $1$) \
                  &= mathbfP(textthere are at most $n$ arrivals by time $1$) \
                  &= mathbfP(N(1) leq n) = sum_k=0^n frac1k!e^-1. endalign*



                Combining two observations proves the desired identity.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  7












                  $begingroup$

                  It depends on what it means to be famous, but it is a quite well-known formula in probability theory. Indeed, let $X$ be the sum of $(n+1)$ i.i.d. $textExp(1)$ random variables. Then




                  1. $X$ has the PDF $f_X(x) = (x^n e^-x / n!) mathbf1(x > 0)$, and so,



                    $$ int_1^infty x^n e^-x , mathrmdx = n! ,mathbfP(X > 1). $$




                  2. $X$ can be realized as the $(n+1)$-th arrival time of the Poisson process $N = (N_t)_tgeq 0$ with unit rate, and so,



                    beginalign*
                    mathbfP(X > 1)
                    &= mathbfP(text$(n+1)$-th arrival has not occurred by time $1$) \
                    &= mathbfP(textthere are at most $n$ arrivals by time $1$) \
                    &= mathbfP(N(1) leq n) = sum_k=0^n frac1k!e^-1. endalign*



                  Combining two observations proves the desired identity.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    7












                    7








                    7





                    $begingroup$

                    It depends on what it means to be famous, but it is a quite well-known formula in probability theory. Indeed, let $X$ be the sum of $(n+1)$ i.i.d. $textExp(1)$ random variables. Then




                    1. $X$ has the PDF $f_X(x) = (x^n e^-x / n!) mathbf1(x > 0)$, and so,



                      $$ int_1^infty x^n e^-x , mathrmdx = n! ,mathbfP(X > 1). $$




                    2. $X$ can be realized as the $(n+1)$-th arrival time of the Poisson process $N = (N_t)_tgeq 0$ with unit rate, and so,



                      beginalign*
                      mathbfP(X > 1)
                      &= mathbfP(text$(n+1)$-th arrival has not occurred by time $1$) \
                      &= mathbfP(textthere are at most $n$ arrivals by time $1$) \
                      &= mathbfP(N(1) leq n) = sum_k=0^n frac1k!e^-1. endalign*



                    Combining two observations proves the desired identity.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    It depends on what it means to be famous, but it is a quite well-known formula in probability theory. Indeed, let $X$ be the sum of $(n+1)$ i.i.d. $textExp(1)$ random variables. Then




                    1. $X$ has the PDF $f_X(x) = (x^n e^-x / n!) mathbf1(x > 0)$, and so,



                      $$ int_1^infty x^n e^-x , mathrmdx = n! ,mathbfP(X > 1). $$




                    2. $X$ can be realized as the $(n+1)$-th arrival time of the Poisson process $N = (N_t)_tgeq 0$ with unit rate, and so,



                      beginalign*
                      mathbfP(X > 1)
                      &= mathbfP(text$(n+1)$-th arrival has not occurred by time $1$) \
                      &= mathbfP(textthere are at most $n$ arrivals by time $1$) \
                      &= mathbfP(N(1) leq n) = sum_k=0^n frac1k!e^-1. endalign*



                    Combining two observations proves the desired identity.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 18 hours ago

























                    answered 18 hours ago









                    Sangchul LeeSangchul Lee

                    99k12175287




                    99k12175287





















                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        It is true and changing the summation order results in a slightly different expression, which I find easier to prove:




                        $int_1^infty x^n e^-xdx = frac1esum_k = 0^n fracn!k!$




                        You can prove it by using induction and integration by parts:




                        case n = 0:



                        $int_1^infty x^0 e^-xdx = [-e^-x]_1^infty = 0 + frac1e = frac1e frac0!0!$



                        step $n rightarrow n+1$:



                        $int_1^infty x^n+1 e^-xdx = [-x^n+1e^-x]_1^infty + (n+1)int_1^infty x^n e^-xdx = frac1e + (n+1)left(frac1esum_k = 0^n fracn!k! right) = frac1e left(1 + sum_k = 0^n frac(n+1)!k!right) = frac1esum_k = 0^n+1 frac(n+1)!k!$







                        share|cite|improve this answer










                        New contributor



                        otto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.





                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          It is true and changing the summation order results in a slightly different expression, which I find easier to prove:




                          $int_1^infty x^n e^-xdx = frac1esum_k = 0^n fracn!k!$




                          You can prove it by using induction and integration by parts:




                          case n = 0:



                          $int_1^infty x^0 e^-xdx = [-e^-x]_1^infty = 0 + frac1e = frac1e frac0!0!$



                          step $n rightarrow n+1$:



                          $int_1^infty x^n+1 e^-xdx = [-x^n+1e^-x]_1^infty + (n+1)int_1^infty x^n e^-xdx = frac1e + (n+1)left(frac1esum_k = 0^n fracn!k! right) = frac1e left(1 + sum_k = 0^n frac(n+1)!k!right) = frac1esum_k = 0^n+1 frac(n+1)!k!$







                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          New contributor



                          otto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.





                          $endgroup$















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            It is true and changing the summation order results in a slightly different expression, which I find easier to prove:




                            $int_1^infty x^n e^-xdx = frac1esum_k = 0^n fracn!k!$




                            You can prove it by using induction and integration by parts:




                            case n = 0:



                            $int_1^infty x^0 e^-xdx = [-e^-x]_1^infty = 0 + frac1e = frac1e frac0!0!$



                            step $n rightarrow n+1$:



                            $int_1^infty x^n+1 e^-xdx = [-x^n+1e^-x]_1^infty + (n+1)int_1^infty x^n e^-xdx = frac1e + (n+1)left(frac1esum_k = 0^n fracn!k! right) = frac1e left(1 + sum_k = 0^n frac(n+1)!k!right) = frac1esum_k = 0^n+1 frac(n+1)!k!$







                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            New contributor



                            otto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            $endgroup$



                            It is true and changing the summation order results in a slightly different expression, which I find easier to prove:




                            $int_1^infty x^n e^-xdx = frac1esum_k = 0^n fracn!k!$




                            You can prove it by using induction and integration by parts:




                            case n = 0:



                            $int_1^infty x^0 e^-xdx = [-e^-x]_1^infty = 0 + frac1e = frac1e frac0!0!$



                            step $n rightarrow n+1$:



                            $int_1^infty x^n+1 e^-xdx = [-x^n+1e^-x]_1^infty + (n+1)int_1^infty x^n e^-xdx = frac1e + (n+1)left(frac1esum_k = 0^n fracn!k! right) = frac1e left(1 + sum_k = 0^n frac(n+1)!k!right) = frac1esum_k = 0^n+1 frac(n+1)!k!$








                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            New contributor



                            otto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.








                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer








                            edited 19 hours ago





















                            New contributor



                            otto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.








                            answered 19 hours ago









                            ottootto

                            513




                            513




                            New contributor



                            otto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.




                            New contributor




                            otto is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                This formula can be proven by simple induction.
                                Note, that we can also start with $n=0$ since both sides evaluate to $frac1e$.
                                [At first I stated this to be wrong for n=0.]



                                For $n=1$ we conclude $int_1^infty x e^-x, dx=frac2e=frac1esum_k=0^1 frac1!(1-k)!$ with partial integration.



                                The inductive step is done similary.



                                We have:



                                $int_1^infty x^n+1e^-x, dx =-e^xx^n|_1^infty+(n+1)int_1^infty e^-xx^n, dx$



                                $=frac1e+(n+1)sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)!$. By the inductive claim.



                                $=frac1e(1+sum_k=0^n frac(n+1)!(n-k)!)$



                                With an index shift, we get:



                                $=frac1e(1+sum_k=1^n+1 frac(n+1)!n-(k-1)!)$



                                $=frac1esum_k=0^n+1frac(n+1)!(n+1-k)!$






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$












                                • $begingroup$
                                  The equation still holds when $n=0$
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Julian Mejia
                                  16 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @JulianMejia You are right. I edit that.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Cornman
                                  13 hours ago















                                0












                                $begingroup$

                                This formula can be proven by simple induction.
                                Note, that we can also start with $n=0$ since both sides evaluate to $frac1e$.
                                [At first I stated this to be wrong for n=0.]



                                For $n=1$ we conclude $int_1^infty x e^-x, dx=frac2e=frac1esum_k=0^1 frac1!(1-k)!$ with partial integration.



                                The inductive step is done similary.



                                We have:



                                $int_1^infty x^n+1e^-x, dx =-e^xx^n|_1^infty+(n+1)int_1^infty e^-xx^n, dx$



                                $=frac1e+(n+1)sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)!$. By the inductive claim.



                                $=frac1e(1+sum_k=0^n frac(n+1)!(n-k)!)$



                                With an index shift, we get:



                                $=frac1e(1+sum_k=1^n+1 frac(n+1)!n-(k-1)!)$



                                $=frac1esum_k=0^n+1frac(n+1)!(n+1-k)!$






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$












                                • $begingroup$
                                  The equation still holds when $n=0$
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Julian Mejia
                                  16 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @JulianMejia You are right. I edit that.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Cornman
                                  13 hours ago













                                0












                                0








                                0





                                $begingroup$

                                This formula can be proven by simple induction.
                                Note, that we can also start with $n=0$ since both sides evaluate to $frac1e$.
                                [At first I stated this to be wrong for n=0.]



                                For $n=1$ we conclude $int_1^infty x e^-x, dx=frac2e=frac1esum_k=0^1 frac1!(1-k)!$ with partial integration.



                                The inductive step is done similary.



                                We have:



                                $int_1^infty x^n+1e^-x, dx =-e^xx^n|_1^infty+(n+1)int_1^infty e^-xx^n, dx$



                                $=frac1e+(n+1)sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)!$. By the inductive claim.



                                $=frac1e(1+sum_k=0^n frac(n+1)!(n-k)!)$



                                With an index shift, we get:



                                $=frac1e(1+sum_k=1^n+1 frac(n+1)!n-(k-1)!)$



                                $=frac1esum_k=0^n+1frac(n+1)!(n+1-k)!$






                                share|cite|improve this answer











                                $endgroup$



                                This formula can be proven by simple induction.
                                Note, that we can also start with $n=0$ since both sides evaluate to $frac1e$.
                                [At first I stated this to be wrong for n=0.]



                                For $n=1$ we conclude $int_1^infty x e^-x, dx=frac2e=frac1esum_k=0^1 frac1!(1-k)!$ with partial integration.



                                The inductive step is done similary.



                                We have:



                                $int_1^infty x^n+1e^-x, dx =-e^xx^n|_1^infty+(n+1)int_1^infty e^-xx^n, dx$



                                $=frac1e+(n+1)sum_k=0^n fracn!(n-k)!$. By the inductive claim.



                                $=frac1e(1+sum_k=0^n frac(n+1)!(n-k)!)$



                                With an index shift, we get:



                                $=frac1e(1+sum_k=1^n+1 frac(n+1)!n-(k-1)!)$



                                $=frac1esum_k=0^n+1frac(n+1)!(n+1-k)!$







                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer








                                edited 13 hours ago

























                                answered 19 hours ago









                                CornmanCornman

                                4,37521333




                                4,37521333











                                • $begingroup$
                                  The equation still holds when $n=0$
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Julian Mejia
                                  16 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @JulianMejia You are right. I edit that.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Cornman
                                  13 hours ago
















                                • $begingroup$
                                  The equation still holds when $n=0$
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Julian Mejia
                                  16 hours ago










                                • $begingroup$
                                  @JulianMejia You are right. I edit that.
                                  $endgroup$
                                  – Cornman
                                  13 hours ago















                                $begingroup$
                                The equation still holds when $n=0$
                                $endgroup$
                                – Julian Mejia
                                16 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                The equation still holds when $n=0$
                                $endgroup$
                                – Julian Mejia
                                16 hours ago












                                $begingroup$
                                @JulianMejia You are right. I edit that.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Cornman
                                13 hours ago




                                $begingroup$
                                @JulianMejia You are right. I edit that.
                                $endgroup$
                                – Cornman
                                13 hours ago










                                Starlight Road is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Starlight Road is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Starlight Road is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Starlight Road is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3259696%2fis-this-equation-correct-and-if-so-is-this-famous%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                                Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                                19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу