What would earth look like at night in medieval times?How to Mimimize Air Loss in Space-Based Cities?Would we ever find an alien space probe?How to fight a kitty army?What if aliens invading Earth turned out to be invisible?Alien electromagnetic visionWhat would be different if a person has broader visual spectrum than normalWhat would a medieval mech look like?What would a recession look like in medieval times?Peeping at Antipodes: How long would it take to peek around the sun using modern technology?Macroevolution in an isolated room

Does ultrasonic bath cleaning damage laboratory volumetric glassware calibration?

Is adding a new player (or players) a DM decision, or a group decision?

What are the benefits of using the X Card safety tool in comparison to plain communication?

How come I was asked by a CBP officer why I was in the US?

Short and long term plans in a closed game in the Sicilian Defense

Change CPU MHz from Registry

Why is the G major to Bb major resolution so strong?

What sort of mathematical problems are there in AI that people are working on?

Dimensions of list used in test

How well known and how commonly used was Huffman coding in 1979?

A player is constantly pestering me about rules, what do I do as a DM?

Fedora boot screen shows both Fedora logo and Lenovo logo. Why and How?

Why is C++ initial allocation so much larger than C's?

Should I hide continue button until tasks are completed?

What would earth look like at night in medieval times?

Why aren't (poly-)cotton tents more popular?

How to get cool night-vision without lame drawbacks?

Is it damaging to turn off a small fridge for two days every week?

How can I convince my reader that I will not use a certain trope?

Animation advice please

Why doesn't a marching band have strings?

Why is the voltage measurement of this circuit different when the switch is on?

How can I get more energy without spending coins?

No IMPLICIT_CONVERSION warning in this query plan



What would earth look like at night in medieval times?


How to Mimimize Air Loss in Space-Based Cities?Would we ever find an alien space probe?How to fight a kitty army?What if aliens invading Earth turned out to be invisible?Alien electromagnetic visionWhat would be different if a person has broader visual spectrum than normalWhat would a medieval mech look like?What would a recession look like in medieval times?Peeping at Antipodes: How long would it take to peek around the sun using modern technology?Macroevolution in an isolated room






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2












$begingroup$


Background: Aliens are debating whether to launch an invasion of Earth in medieval times, say the year 1000. They launch a satellite to orbit earth and send pictures of Earth to see whether it is worth taking.



What would images of the Earth look like? I am guessing that the day half would look sorta the same as it does now. The night half is what I am really concerned about, since electric lights don't exist yet. Would lamps and fires be visible from space? Would the aliens be able to see areas of high population based on the brightness of the area?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I don't know if map-making is the right tag for this; please comment if there is a better one.
    $endgroup$
    – Bilbo Baggins
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not an answer, but looking at daylight satellite pictures would actually give a lot of information.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Wealthy areas (mostly China) might have a little night life in the largest, wealthiest cities. But nothing like we're used to today. Remember, 95% of humans were impoverished rural peasants, often fighting starvation and pestilence. Night lighting of any sort was expensive and often dangerous. Most folks went to sleep soon after sundown.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    7 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$


Background: Aliens are debating whether to launch an invasion of Earth in medieval times, say the year 1000. They launch a satellite to orbit earth and send pictures of Earth to see whether it is worth taking.



What would images of the Earth look like? I am guessing that the day half would look sorta the same as it does now. The night half is what I am really concerned about, since electric lights don't exist yet. Would lamps and fires be visible from space? Would the aliens be able to see areas of high population based on the brightness of the area?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    I don't know if map-making is the right tag for this; please comment if there is a better one.
    $endgroup$
    – Bilbo Baggins
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not an answer, but looking at daylight satellite pictures would actually give a lot of information.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Wealthy areas (mostly China) might have a little night life in the largest, wealthiest cities. But nothing like we're used to today. Remember, 95% of humans were impoverished rural peasants, often fighting starvation and pestilence. Night lighting of any sort was expensive and often dangerous. Most folks went to sleep soon after sundown.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    7 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$


Background: Aliens are debating whether to launch an invasion of Earth in medieval times, say the year 1000. They launch a satellite to orbit earth and send pictures of Earth to see whether it is worth taking.



What would images of the Earth look like? I am guessing that the day half would look sorta the same as it does now. The night half is what I am really concerned about, since electric lights don't exist yet. Would lamps and fires be visible from space? Would the aliens be able to see areas of high population based on the brightness of the area?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




Background: Aliens are debating whether to launch an invasion of Earth in medieval times, say the year 1000. They launch a satellite to orbit earth and send pictures of Earth to see whether it is worth taking.



What would images of the Earth look like? I am guessing that the day half would look sorta the same as it does now. The night half is what I am really concerned about, since electric lights don't exist yet. Would lamps and fires be visible from space? Would the aliens be able to see areas of high population based on the brightness of the area?







science-based aliens medieval earth map-making






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









Bilbo BagginsBilbo Baggins

86214 bronze badges




86214 bronze badges











  • $begingroup$
    I don't know if map-making is the right tag for this; please comment if there is a better one.
    $endgroup$
    – Bilbo Baggins
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not an answer, but looking at daylight satellite pictures would actually give a lot of information.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Wealthy areas (mostly China) might have a little night life in the largest, wealthiest cities. But nothing like we're used to today. Remember, 95% of humans were impoverished rural peasants, often fighting starvation and pestilence. Night lighting of any sort was expensive and often dangerous. Most folks went to sleep soon after sundown.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    7 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    I don't know if map-making is the right tag for this; please comment if there is a better one.
    $endgroup$
    – Bilbo Baggins
    8 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Not an answer, but looking at daylight satellite pictures would actually give a lot of information.
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander
    8 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Wealthy areas (mostly China) might have a little night life in the largest, wealthiest cities. But nothing like we're used to today. Remember, 95% of humans were impoverished rural peasants, often fighting starvation and pestilence. Night lighting of any sort was expensive and often dangerous. Most folks went to sleep soon after sundown.
    $endgroup$
    – user535733
    7 hours ago
















$begingroup$
I don't know if map-making is the right tag for this; please comment if there is a better one.
$endgroup$
– Bilbo Baggins
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
I don't know if map-making is the right tag for this; please comment if there is a better one.
$endgroup$
– Bilbo Baggins
8 hours ago












$begingroup$
Not an answer, but looking at daylight satellite pictures would actually give a lot of information.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
8 hours ago




$begingroup$
Not an answer, but looking at daylight satellite pictures would actually give a lot of information.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
8 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Wealthy areas (mostly China) might have a little night life in the largest, wealthiest cities. But nothing like we're used to today. Remember, 95% of humans were impoverished rural peasants, often fighting starvation and pestilence. Night lighting of any sort was expensive and often dangerous. Most folks went to sleep soon after sundown.
$endgroup$
– user535733
7 hours ago





$begingroup$
Wealthy areas (mostly China) might have a little night life in the largest, wealthiest cities. But nothing like we're used to today. Remember, 95% of humans were impoverished rural peasants, often fighting starvation and pestilence. Night lighting of any sort was expensive and often dangerous. Most folks went to sleep soon after sundown.
$endgroup$
– user535733
7 hours ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

They'd be spotted



If the aliens were orbiting at the altitude of the ISS, and if the eyes of the aliens are similar to ours, and they were looking at the earth without telescopes, they would be able to see fires burning at night. In the 1940's Selig Hecht and his associates measured that the light from a flickering candle could be seen at a distance of up to 30 miles. The ISS orbits over 8 times this distance away from the earth, so you'd need your fire to be 64 times brighter in order to see it (due to the inverse square law). So it's totally reasonable for a substantial fire to give off the same amount of light as 64 candles, or anything giving off as much light as a modern 60 watt incandescent bulb. The real question is whether people are burning outdoor fires all night in your world in any significant way, my guess would be that they would burn fires inside when they were close to population centers, and only have outdoor fires if they were away from home in the woods.



Please also consider why the aliens want to invade, do they want the people? That seems unlikely. Maybe it'd be better for aliens to look at factors other than the population of an intelligent species for their criteria of whether or not to invade. What do aliens really want, given that they already have sufficient technology to travel through space?






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    How would they distinguish artificial fire from the much more common natural fires?
    $endgroup$
    – Gimelist
    4 hours ago


















2












$begingroup$

At best, it would look kind of like North Korea in modern times:



enter image description here



Kind of nice, in a way...






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    It's irrelevant, unless you're proposing a technology dichotomy



    Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? Ignoring the fact that they'd at least have the technology for thermal imagery (detecting fires, lanterns, even people and animals, by their heat emissions), they could easily have uber-cool Star Trek grade "biosigns" detection.



    Which means it doesn't matter at all what the surface looks like, day or night.



    However, just for fun...



    Year 1,000 CE, Daytime



    With rare exception, the surface of the Earth would look like pristine, unadulterated habitat. The aliens would look down on a planet 99.99% free of all pollution (not including forest fires). They would see deserts, forests, glaciers, islands, lakes... and not a single electric light or asphalted road.



    The rare exceptions are the handful of cities with 100,000+ populations. There were certainly a few, but very, very, few. Some thing Kaifeng, China; Baghdad, Iraq; and/or Cordoba, Spain could fit into that category.



    Cities of this size would look a little patch-work, like looking down on cultivated land from the top of a mountain. But to be honest (and now that I think about it), the patchwork of farms would likely be much more visible than the crisscross of dirt or early cobble roads (and a handful of Roman concrete roads).



    Frankly, I believe in the year 1,000 that the Earth would look barely inhabited at all — assuming all you have to look with is a telescope.



    Year 1,000 CE, Night time



    But, no electric lights. That means the much less powerful, much less likely to be on-all-night, and much more sparse use of lanterns and fires. Rather than the bright, almost pixelated look of a modern city at night, the aliens would see, maybe, a half-dozen or dozen areas where there was a soft orange glow (if even that, from space).



    I wouldn't be surprised if your aliens saw anything other than black, with the possible exception of lightning strikes and active volcanoes.



    Again, assuming all they have to look with is a telescope.



    Conclusion



    But it's inconceivable that the only thing they have to work with is a telescope. They can cross intragalactic distances — but optics are all they have to work with. Even if the only thing they have to work with is broad-spectrum electromagnetic radiation (which includes thermal), the odds are in my favor that they could count the hair on a woman's head from high orbit.



    I don't believe your aliens would have trouble evaluating the Earth at all. If anything, without all those pesky humans gobbling up all the resources, the Earth in year 1,000 CE would look pretty plum.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? That's exactly what we have done with all our probes, from the Vikings to New Horizons
      $endgroup$
      – L.Dutch
      9 mins ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f149405%2fwhat-would-earth-look-like-at-night-in-medieval-times%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5












    $begingroup$

    They'd be spotted



    If the aliens were orbiting at the altitude of the ISS, and if the eyes of the aliens are similar to ours, and they were looking at the earth without telescopes, they would be able to see fires burning at night. In the 1940's Selig Hecht and his associates measured that the light from a flickering candle could be seen at a distance of up to 30 miles. The ISS orbits over 8 times this distance away from the earth, so you'd need your fire to be 64 times brighter in order to see it (due to the inverse square law). So it's totally reasonable for a substantial fire to give off the same amount of light as 64 candles, or anything giving off as much light as a modern 60 watt incandescent bulb. The real question is whether people are burning outdoor fires all night in your world in any significant way, my guess would be that they would burn fires inside when they were close to population centers, and only have outdoor fires if they were away from home in the woods.



    Please also consider why the aliens want to invade, do they want the people? That seems unlikely. Maybe it'd be better for aliens to look at factors other than the population of an intelligent species for their criteria of whether or not to invade. What do aliens really want, given that they already have sufficient technology to travel through space?






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      How would they distinguish artificial fire from the much more common natural fires?
      $endgroup$
      – Gimelist
      4 hours ago















    5












    $begingroup$

    They'd be spotted



    If the aliens were orbiting at the altitude of the ISS, and if the eyes of the aliens are similar to ours, and they were looking at the earth without telescopes, they would be able to see fires burning at night. In the 1940's Selig Hecht and his associates measured that the light from a flickering candle could be seen at a distance of up to 30 miles. The ISS orbits over 8 times this distance away from the earth, so you'd need your fire to be 64 times brighter in order to see it (due to the inverse square law). So it's totally reasonable for a substantial fire to give off the same amount of light as 64 candles, or anything giving off as much light as a modern 60 watt incandescent bulb. The real question is whether people are burning outdoor fires all night in your world in any significant way, my guess would be that they would burn fires inside when they were close to population centers, and only have outdoor fires if they were away from home in the woods.



    Please also consider why the aliens want to invade, do they want the people? That seems unlikely. Maybe it'd be better for aliens to look at factors other than the population of an intelligent species for their criteria of whether or not to invade. What do aliens really want, given that they already have sufficient technology to travel through space?






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      How would they distinguish artificial fire from the much more common natural fires?
      $endgroup$
      – Gimelist
      4 hours ago













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    They'd be spotted



    If the aliens were orbiting at the altitude of the ISS, and if the eyes of the aliens are similar to ours, and they were looking at the earth without telescopes, they would be able to see fires burning at night. In the 1940's Selig Hecht and his associates measured that the light from a flickering candle could be seen at a distance of up to 30 miles. The ISS orbits over 8 times this distance away from the earth, so you'd need your fire to be 64 times brighter in order to see it (due to the inverse square law). So it's totally reasonable for a substantial fire to give off the same amount of light as 64 candles, or anything giving off as much light as a modern 60 watt incandescent bulb. The real question is whether people are burning outdoor fires all night in your world in any significant way, my guess would be that they would burn fires inside when they were close to population centers, and only have outdoor fires if they were away from home in the woods.



    Please also consider why the aliens want to invade, do they want the people? That seems unlikely. Maybe it'd be better for aliens to look at factors other than the population of an intelligent species for their criteria of whether or not to invade. What do aliens really want, given that they already have sufficient technology to travel through space?






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    They'd be spotted



    If the aliens were orbiting at the altitude of the ISS, and if the eyes of the aliens are similar to ours, and they were looking at the earth without telescopes, they would be able to see fires burning at night. In the 1940's Selig Hecht and his associates measured that the light from a flickering candle could be seen at a distance of up to 30 miles. The ISS orbits over 8 times this distance away from the earth, so you'd need your fire to be 64 times brighter in order to see it (due to the inverse square law). So it's totally reasonable for a substantial fire to give off the same amount of light as 64 candles, or anything giving off as much light as a modern 60 watt incandescent bulb. The real question is whether people are burning outdoor fires all night in your world in any significant way, my guess would be that they would burn fires inside when they were close to population centers, and only have outdoor fires if they were away from home in the woods.



    Please also consider why the aliens want to invade, do they want the people? That seems unlikely. Maybe it'd be better for aliens to look at factors other than the population of an intelligent species for their criteria of whether or not to invade. What do aliens really want, given that they already have sufficient technology to travel through space?







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 8 hours ago









    MathaddictMathaddict

    5,8437 silver badges36 bronze badges




    5,8437 silver badges36 bronze badges











    • $begingroup$
      How would they distinguish artificial fire from the much more common natural fires?
      $endgroup$
      – Gimelist
      4 hours ago
















    • $begingroup$
      How would they distinguish artificial fire from the much more common natural fires?
      $endgroup$
      – Gimelist
      4 hours ago















    $begingroup$
    How would they distinguish artificial fire from the much more common natural fires?
    $endgroup$
    – Gimelist
    4 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    How would they distinguish artificial fire from the much more common natural fires?
    $endgroup$
    – Gimelist
    4 hours ago













    2












    $begingroup$

    At best, it would look kind of like North Korea in modern times:



    enter image description here



    Kind of nice, in a way...






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      2












      $begingroup$

      At best, it would look kind of like North Korea in modern times:



      enter image description here



      Kind of nice, in a way...






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        2












        2








        2





        $begingroup$

        At best, it would look kind of like North Korea in modern times:



        enter image description here



        Kind of nice, in a way...






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        At best, it would look kind of like North Korea in modern times:



        enter image description here



        Kind of nice, in a way...







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 5 hours ago









        elemtilaselemtilas

        16.8k4 gold badges37 silver badges72 bronze badges




        16.8k4 gold badges37 silver badges72 bronze badges





















            2












            $begingroup$

            It's irrelevant, unless you're proposing a technology dichotomy



            Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? Ignoring the fact that they'd at least have the technology for thermal imagery (detecting fires, lanterns, even people and animals, by their heat emissions), they could easily have uber-cool Star Trek grade "biosigns" detection.



            Which means it doesn't matter at all what the surface looks like, day or night.



            However, just for fun...



            Year 1,000 CE, Daytime



            With rare exception, the surface of the Earth would look like pristine, unadulterated habitat. The aliens would look down on a planet 99.99% free of all pollution (not including forest fires). They would see deserts, forests, glaciers, islands, lakes... and not a single electric light or asphalted road.



            The rare exceptions are the handful of cities with 100,000+ populations. There were certainly a few, but very, very, few. Some thing Kaifeng, China; Baghdad, Iraq; and/or Cordoba, Spain could fit into that category.



            Cities of this size would look a little patch-work, like looking down on cultivated land from the top of a mountain. But to be honest (and now that I think about it), the patchwork of farms would likely be much more visible than the crisscross of dirt or early cobble roads (and a handful of Roman concrete roads).



            Frankly, I believe in the year 1,000 that the Earth would look barely inhabited at all — assuming all you have to look with is a telescope.



            Year 1,000 CE, Night time



            But, no electric lights. That means the much less powerful, much less likely to be on-all-night, and much more sparse use of lanterns and fires. Rather than the bright, almost pixelated look of a modern city at night, the aliens would see, maybe, a half-dozen or dozen areas where there was a soft orange glow (if even that, from space).



            I wouldn't be surprised if your aliens saw anything other than black, with the possible exception of lightning strikes and active volcanoes.



            Again, assuming all they have to look with is a telescope.



            Conclusion



            But it's inconceivable that the only thing they have to work with is a telescope. They can cross intragalactic distances — but optics are all they have to work with. Even if the only thing they have to work with is broad-spectrum electromagnetic radiation (which includes thermal), the odds are in my favor that they could count the hair on a woman's head from high orbit.



            I don't believe your aliens would have trouble evaluating the Earth at all. If anything, without all those pesky humans gobbling up all the resources, the Earth in year 1,000 CE would look pretty plum.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? That's exactly what we have done with all our probes, from the Vikings to New Horizons
              $endgroup$
              – L.Dutch
              9 mins ago















            2












            $begingroup$

            It's irrelevant, unless you're proposing a technology dichotomy



            Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? Ignoring the fact that they'd at least have the technology for thermal imagery (detecting fires, lanterns, even people and animals, by their heat emissions), they could easily have uber-cool Star Trek grade "biosigns" detection.



            Which means it doesn't matter at all what the surface looks like, day or night.



            However, just for fun...



            Year 1,000 CE, Daytime



            With rare exception, the surface of the Earth would look like pristine, unadulterated habitat. The aliens would look down on a planet 99.99% free of all pollution (not including forest fires). They would see deserts, forests, glaciers, islands, lakes... and not a single electric light or asphalted road.



            The rare exceptions are the handful of cities with 100,000+ populations. There were certainly a few, but very, very, few. Some thing Kaifeng, China; Baghdad, Iraq; and/or Cordoba, Spain could fit into that category.



            Cities of this size would look a little patch-work, like looking down on cultivated land from the top of a mountain. But to be honest (and now that I think about it), the patchwork of farms would likely be much more visible than the crisscross of dirt or early cobble roads (and a handful of Roman concrete roads).



            Frankly, I believe in the year 1,000 that the Earth would look barely inhabited at all — assuming all you have to look with is a telescope.



            Year 1,000 CE, Night time



            But, no electric lights. That means the much less powerful, much less likely to be on-all-night, and much more sparse use of lanterns and fires. Rather than the bright, almost pixelated look of a modern city at night, the aliens would see, maybe, a half-dozen or dozen areas where there was a soft orange glow (if even that, from space).



            I wouldn't be surprised if your aliens saw anything other than black, with the possible exception of lightning strikes and active volcanoes.



            Again, assuming all they have to look with is a telescope.



            Conclusion



            But it's inconceivable that the only thing they have to work with is a telescope. They can cross intragalactic distances — but optics are all they have to work with. Even if the only thing they have to work with is broad-spectrum electromagnetic radiation (which includes thermal), the odds are in my favor that they could count the hair on a woman's head from high orbit.



            I don't believe your aliens would have trouble evaluating the Earth at all. If anything, without all those pesky humans gobbling up all the resources, the Earth in year 1,000 CE would look pretty plum.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? That's exactly what we have done with all our probes, from the Vikings to New Horizons
              $endgroup$
              – L.Dutch
              9 mins ago













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            It's irrelevant, unless you're proposing a technology dichotomy



            Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? Ignoring the fact that they'd at least have the technology for thermal imagery (detecting fires, lanterns, even people and animals, by their heat emissions), they could easily have uber-cool Star Trek grade "biosigns" detection.



            Which means it doesn't matter at all what the surface looks like, day or night.



            However, just for fun...



            Year 1,000 CE, Daytime



            With rare exception, the surface of the Earth would look like pristine, unadulterated habitat. The aliens would look down on a planet 99.99% free of all pollution (not including forest fires). They would see deserts, forests, glaciers, islands, lakes... and not a single electric light or asphalted road.



            The rare exceptions are the handful of cities with 100,000+ populations. There were certainly a few, but very, very, few. Some thing Kaifeng, China; Baghdad, Iraq; and/or Cordoba, Spain could fit into that category.



            Cities of this size would look a little patch-work, like looking down on cultivated land from the top of a mountain. But to be honest (and now that I think about it), the patchwork of farms would likely be much more visible than the crisscross of dirt or early cobble roads (and a handful of Roman concrete roads).



            Frankly, I believe in the year 1,000 that the Earth would look barely inhabited at all — assuming all you have to look with is a telescope.



            Year 1,000 CE, Night time



            But, no electric lights. That means the much less powerful, much less likely to be on-all-night, and much more sparse use of lanterns and fires. Rather than the bright, almost pixelated look of a modern city at night, the aliens would see, maybe, a half-dozen or dozen areas where there was a soft orange glow (if even that, from space).



            I wouldn't be surprised if your aliens saw anything other than black, with the possible exception of lightning strikes and active volcanoes.



            Again, assuming all they have to look with is a telescope.



            Conclusion



            But it's inconceivable that the only thing they have to work with is a telescope. They can cross intragalactic distances — but optics are all they have to work with. Even if the only thing they have to work with is broad-spectrum electromagnetic radiation (which includes thermal), the odds are in my favor that they could count the hair on a woman's head from high orbit.



            I don't believe your aliens would have trouble evaluating the Earth at all. If anything, without all those pesky humans gobbling up all the resources, the Earth in year 1,000 CE would look pretty plum.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            It's irrelevant, unless you're proposing a technology dichotomy



            Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? Ignoring the fact that they'd at least have the technology for thermal imagery (detecting fires, lanterns, even people and animals, by their heat emissions), they could easily have uber-cool Star Trek grade "biosigns" detection.



            Which means it doesn't matter at all what the surface looks like, day or night.



            However, just for fun...



            Year 1,000 CE, Daytime



            With rare exception, the surface of the Earth would look like pristine, unadulterated habitat. The aliens would look down on a planet 99.99% free of all pollution (not including forest fires). They would see deserts, forests, glaciers, islands, lakes... and not a single electric light or asphalted road.



            The rare exceptions are the handful of cities with 100,000+ populations. There were certainly a few, but very, very, few. Some thing Kaifeng, China; Baghdad, Iraq; and/or Cordoba, Spain could fit into that category.



            Cities of this size would look a little patch-work, like looking down on cultivated land from the top of a mountain. But to be honest (and now that I think about it), the patchwork of farms would likely be much more visible than the crisscross of dirt or early cobble roads (and a handful of Roman concrete roads).



            Frankly, I believe in the year 1,000 that the Earth would look barely inhabited at all — assuming all you have to look with is a telescope.



            Year 1,000 CE, Night time



            But, no electric lights. That means the much less powerful, much less likely to be on-all-night, and much more sparse use of lanterns and fires. Rather than the bright, almost pixelated look of a modern city at night, the aliens would see, maybe, a half-dozen or dozen areas where there was a soft orange glow (if even that, from space).



            I wouldn't be surprised if your aliens saw anything other than black, with the possible exception of lightning strikes and active volcanoes.



            Again, assuming all they have to look with is a telescope.



            Conclusion



            But it's inconceivable that the only thing they have to work with is a telescope. They can cross intragalactic distances — but optics are all they have to work with. Even if the only thing they have to work with is broad-spectrum electromagnetic radiation (which includes thermal), the odds are in my favor that they could count the hair on a woman's head from high orbit.



            I don't believe your aliens would have trouble evaluating the Earth at all. If anything, without all those pesky humans gobbling up all the resources, the Earth in year 1,000 CE would look pretty plum.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 3 hours ago









            JBHJBH

            55.4k8 gold badges127 silver badges268 bronze badges




            55.4k8 gold badges127 silver badges268 bronze badges











            • $begingroup$
              Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? That's exactly what we have done with all our probes, from the Vikings to New Horizons
              $endgroup$
              – L.Dutch
              9 mins ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? That's exactly what we have done with all our probes, from the Vikings to New Horizons
              $endgroup$
              – L.Dutch
              9 mins ago















            $begingroup$
            Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? That's exactly what we have done with all our probes, from the Vikings to New Horizons
            $endgroup$
            – L.Dutch
            9 mins ago




            $begingroup$
            Aliens have traveled all the way to Earth, but the only way they have to examine the planet from a distance is optics? That's exactly what we have done with all our probes, from the Vikings to New Horizons
            $endgroup$
            – L.Dutch
            9 mins ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f149405%2fwhat-would-earth-look-like-at-night-in-medieval-times%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

            Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

            Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)