A basic question on circuits and matrix representationSWAP gate(s) in the $R(lambda^-1)$ step of the HHL circuit for $4times 4$ systemsDecomposition of arbitrary 2 qubit operatorSolving a circuit implementing a two-level unitary operationMatrix representation and CX gateHow to construct matrix of regular and “flipped” 2-qubit CNOT?Square root of CNOT and spectral decomposition of the Hadamard gateMatrix representation of multiple qubit gates (Hadamard transform on single wire)Tensorial notation for this quantum XOR circuitUnderstanding CNOT gate for indirect measurementHow to create an Ising coupling gate with Qiskit

How to foreshadow to avoid a 'deus ex machina'-construction

Just how much information should you share with a former client?

How to prevent a single-element caster from being useless against immune foes?

Why don't short runways use ramps for takeoff?

Scam? Checks via Email

Can hardware wallets actually display the amount of funds leaving your control?

How do I make my photos have more impact?

What clothes would flying-people wear?

Why are subdominants unstable?

My employer is refusing to give me the pay that was advertised after an internal job move

How did astronauts using rovers tell direction without compasses on the Moon?

Reading electrical clamp tester higher voltage/amp 400A

Why raspberry pi 4b claims that it's processor is armv7l when in official specification it's ARM v8? How to change it?

Are all French verb conjugation tenses and moods practical and efficient?

Why did I lose on time with 3 pawns vs Knight. Shouldn't it be a draw?

Is it okay for me to decline a project on ethical grounds?

"DDoouubbllee ssppeeaakk!!"

Avoiding Implicit Conversion in Constructor. Explicit keyword doesn't help here

Can machine learning learn a function like finding maximum from a list?

Efficiently finding furthest two nodes in a graph

How does Asimov's second law deal with contradictory orders from different people?

How close to the Sun would you have to be to hear it?

How do discovery writers hibernate?

Why tantalum for the Hayabusa bullets?



A basic question on circuits and matrix representation


SWAP gate(s) in the $R(lambda^-1)$ step of the HHL circuit for $4times 4$ systemsDecomposition of arbitrary 2 qubit operatorSolving a circuit implementing a two-level unitary operationMatrix representation and CX gateHow to construct matrix of regular and “flipped” 2-qubit CNOT?Square root of CNOT and spectral decomposition of the Hadamard gateMatrix representation of multiple qubit gates (Hadamard transform on single wire)Tensorial notation for this quantum XOR circuitUnderstanding CNOT gate for indirect measurementHow to create an Ising coupling gate with Qiskit






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3












$begingroup$


I have several (rather basic) questions on matrix representation of circuits and I would be very grateful to anyone that could clear up my confusion, thank you in advance.



1) When reading circuit diagrams I know that the input qubit goes in the left hand side. So If we are reading a circuit and it's gates go in the order a,b,c does that mean when we want to write out its matrix representation we multiply the matrices in the order c,a,b . For example if we have a circuit which consists of a swap gate followed by a Hadamard gate on the second qubit , followed by a Hadamard gate on the first qubit , then to calculate it's matrix representation we would have to calculate it in the order $(H_1otimes I)(Iotimes H_2)Swap$, correct ? (as this reflects the order of application of gates on the qubit state).



2)If we are given a gate $S=beginpmatrix1 &0 \0 &i endpmatrix$, but it is on the top line of a two line circuit with a line connecting it to the second (In other words it's a control gate ), I know that the first qubit is the control and the second is the target but I'm unsure of how to write it , should it be $S=beginpmatrix1 & 0 &0&0 \ 0 &-i &0&0\0&0&1&0\0&0&0&-i endpmatrix$,



or should it be



$ S=beginpmatrix1 & 0 &0&0 \ 0 &1 &0&0\0&0&-i&0\0&0&0&-i endpmatrix$,










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$


    I have several (rather basic) questions on matrix representation of circuits and I would be very grateful to anyone that could clear up my confusion, thank you in advance.



    1) When reading circuit diagrams I know that the input qubit goes in the left hand side. So If we are reading a circuit and it's gates go in the order a,b,c does that mean when we want to write out its matrix representation we multiply the matrices in the order c,a,b . For example if we have a circuit which consists of a swap gate followed by a Hadamard gate on the second qubit , followed by a Hadamard gate on the first qubit , then to calculate it's matrix representation we would have to calculate it in the order $(H_1otimes I)(Iotimes H_2)Swap$, correct ? (as this reflects the order of application of gates on the qubit state).



    2)If we are given a gate $S=beginpmatrix1 &0 \0 &i endpmatrix$, but it is on the top line of a two line circuit with a line connecting it to the second (In other words it's a control gate ), I know that the first qubit is the control and the second is the target but I'm unsure of how to write it , should it be $S=beginpmatrix1 & 0 &0&0 \ 0 &-i &0&0\0&0&1&0\0&0&0&-i endpmatrix$,



    or should it be



    $ S=beginpmatrix1 & 0 &0&0 \ 0 &1 &0&0\0&0&-i&0\0&0&0&-i endpmatrix$,










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$
















      3












      3








      3





      $begingroup$


      I have several (rather basic) questions on matrix representation of circuits and I would be very grateful to anyone that could clear up my confusion, thank you in advance.



      1) When reading circuit diagrams I know that the input qubit goes in the left hand side. So If we are reading a circuit and it's gates go in the order a,b,c does that mean when we want to write out its matrix representation we multiply the matrices in the order c,a,b . For example if we have a circuit which consists of a swap gate followed by a Hadamard gate on the second qubit , followed by a Hadamard gate on the first qubit , then to calculate it's matrix representation we would have to calculate it in the order $(H_1otimes I)(Iotimes H_2)Swap$, correct ? (as this reflects the order of application of gates on the qubit state).



      2)If we are given a gate $S=beginpmatrix1 &0 \0 &i endpmatrix$, but it is on the top line of a two line circuit with a line connecting it to the second (In other words it's a control gate ), I know that the first qubit is the control and the second is the target but I'm unsure of how to write it , should it be $S=beginpmatrix1 & 0 &0&0 \ 0 &-i &0&0\0&0&1&0\0&0&0&-i endpmatrix$,



      or should it be



      $ S=beginpmatrix1 & 0 &0&0 \ 0 &1 &0&0\0&0&-i&0\0&0&0&-i endpmatrix$,










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I have several (rather basic) questions on matrix representation of circuits and I would be very grateful to anyone that could clear up my confusion, thank you in advance.



      1) When reading circuit diagrams I know that the input qubit goes in the left hand side. So If we are reading a circuit and it's gates go in the order a,b,c does that mean when we want to write out its matrix representation we multiply the matrices in the order c,a,b . For example if we have a circuit which consists of a swap gate followed by a Hadamard gate on the second qubit , followed by a Hadamard gate on the first qubit , then to calculate it's matrix representation we would have to calculate it in the order $(H_1otimes I)(Iotimes H_2)Swap$, correct ? (as this reflects the order of application of gates on the qubit state).



      2)If we are given a gate $S=beginpmatrix1 &0 \0 &i endpmatrix$, but it is on the top line of a two line circuit with a line connecting it to the second (In other words it's a control gate ), I know that the first qubit is the control and the second is the target but I'm unsure of how to write it , should it be $S=beginpmatrix1 & 0 &0&0 \ 0 &-i &0&0\0&0&1&0\0&0&0&-i endpmatrix$,



      or should it be



      $ S=beginpmatrix1 & 0 &0&0 \ 0 &1 &0&0\0&0&-i&0\0&0&0&-i endpmatrix$,







      circuit-construction matrix-representation






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      bhapibhapi

      3578 bronze badges




      3578 bronze badges























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          1. Yes, in the circuit the qubit "enters" to the left, and exits to the right, but when applying the gates to a state you must apply the one on the far left first, then the next and so on, so concretely you do write them down right to left, but it's just a consequence of writing the operator that we want to apply on the left of the vector, while our natural way of writing dictates a "time direction" left to right. As an example the following circuit

          enter image description here



          implements the operation



          $$(Iotimes mathrmCNOT)(mathrmCNOTotimes I)(Hotimes Iotimes I)|000rangle $$



          1. A controlled gate does nothing if the first qubit is $0$ and performs the gate if it is $1$, you can represent it this way

          $$mathrmCS=|0ranglelangle0|otimes I + |1ranglelangle1|otimes S $$
          Hence in matrix form it would be



          $$mathrmCS=beginpmatrix
          I&0\0&S
          endpmatrix =beginpmatrix
          1&0&0&0\0&1&0&0\0&0&1&0\0&0&0&i
          endpmatrix$$






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for succinctly answering all my questions :)
            $endgroup$
            – bhapi
            5 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "694"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6907%2fa-basic-question-on-circuits-and-matrix-representation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          1. Yes, in the circuit the qubit "enters" to the left, and exits to the right, but when applying the gates to a state you must apply the one on the far left first, then the next and so on, so concretely you do write them down right to left, but it's just a consequence of writing the operator that we want to apply on the left of the vector, while our natural way of writing dictates a "time direction" left to right. As an example the following circuit

          enter image description here



          implements the operation



          $$(Iotimes mathrmCNOT)(mathrmCNOTotimes I)(Hotimes Iotimes I)|000rangle $$



          1. A controlled gate does nothing if the first qubit is $0$ and performs the gate if it is $1$, you can represent it this way

          $$mathrmCS=|0ranglelangle0|otimes I + |1ranglelangle1|otimes S $$
          Hence in matrix form it would be



          $$mathrmCS=beginpmatrix
          I&0\0&S
          endpmatrix =beginpmatrix
          1&0&0&0\0&1&0&0\0&0&1&0\0&0&0&i
          endpmatrix$$






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for succinctly answering all my questions :)
            $endgroup$
            – bhapi
            5 hours ago















          3












          $begingroup$

          1. Yes, in the circuit the qubit "enters" to the left, and exits to the right, but when applying the gates to a state you must apply the one on the far left first, then the next and so on, so concretely you do write them down right to left, but it's just a consequence of writing the operator that we want to apply on the left of the vector, while our natural way of writing dictates a "time direction" left to right. As an example the following circuit

          enter image description here



          implements the operation



          $$(Iotimes mathrmCNOT)(mathrmCNOTotimes I)(Hotimes Iotimes I)|000rangle $$



          1. A controlled gate does nothing if the first qubit is $0$ and performs the gate if it is $1$, you can represent it this way

          $$mathrmCS=|0ranglelangle0|otimes I + |1ranglelangle1|otimes S $$
          Hence in matrix form it would be



          $$mathrmCS=beginpmatrix
          I&0\0&S
          endpmatrix =beginpmatrix
          1&0&0&0\0&1&0&0\0&0&1&0\0&0&0&i
          endpmatrix$$






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for succinctly answering all my questions :)
            $endgroup$
            – bhapi
            5 hours ago













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          1. Yes, in the circuit the qubit "enters" to the left, and exits to the right, but when applying the gates to a state you must apply the one on the far left first, then the next and so on, so concretely you do write them down right to left, but it's just a consequence of writing the operator that we want to apply on the left of the vector, while our natural way of writing dictates a "time direction" left to right. As an example the following circuit

          enter image description here



          implements the operation



          $$(Iotimes mathrmCNOT)(mathrmCNOTotimes I)(Hotimes Iotimes I)|000rangle $$



          1. A controlled gate does nothing if the first qubit is $0$ and performs the gate if it is $1$, you can represent it this way

          $$mathrmCS=|0ranglelangle0|otimes I + |1ranglelangle1|otimes S $$
          Hence in matrix form it would be



          $$mathrmCS=beginpmatrix
          I&0\0&S
          endpmatrix =beginpmatrix
          1&0&0&0\0&1&0&0\0&0&1&0\0&0&0&i
          endpmatrix$$






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          1. Yes, in the circuit the qubit "enters" to the left, and exits to the right, but when applying the gates to a state you must apply the one on the far left first, then the next and so on, so concretely you do write them down right to left, but it's just a consequence of writing the operator that we want to apply on the left of the vector, while our natural way of writing dictates a "time direction" left to right. As an example the following circuit

          enter image description here



          implements the operation



          $$(Iotimes mathrmCNOT)(mathrmCNOTotimes I)(Hotimes Iotimes I)|000rangle $$



          1. A controlled gate does nothing if the first qubit is $0$ and performs the gate if it is $1$, you can represent it this way

          $$mathrmCS=|0ranglelangle0|otimes I + |1ranglelangle1|otimes S $$
          Hence in matrix form it would be



          $$mathrmCS=beginpmatrix
          I&0\0&S
          endpmatrix =beginpmatrix
          1&0&0&0\0&1&0&0\0&0&1&0\0&0&0&i
          endpmatrix$$







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 6 hours ago









          user2723984user2723984

          3158 bronze badges




          3158 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for succinctly answering all my questions :)
            $endgroup$
            – bhapi
            5 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Thank you for succinctly answering all my questions :)
            $endgroup$
            – bhapi
            5 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Thank you for succinctly answering all my questions :)
          $endgroup$
          – bhapi
          5 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Thank you for succinctly answering all my questions :)
          $endgroup$
          – bhapi
          5 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Quantum Computing Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fquantumcomputing.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f6907%2fa-basic-question-on-circuits-and-matrix-representation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

          Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

          19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу