Does Ubuntu reduces battery life?Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?Should I use UPS with my laptop to extend the battery life?Some questions on laptop batteryNotebook no longer recognizes battery. What are my options?Increasing Laptop Battery Service LifePrevent i7 from overclocking while on batteryWhy wont new hard drive use battery power?Lenovo Energy Management - Battery life on dual bootBattery indicator can't refresh battery stateLaptop won't boot without power cable connectedDoes dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?

Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?

Summoning A Technology Based Demon

Would people understand me speaking German all over Europe?

Does Ubuntu reduces battery life?

How can Paypal know my card is being used in another account?

Is there an antonym (a complementary antonym) for "spicy" or "hot" regarding food (I DO NOT mean "seasoned", but "hot")?

How do I make my photos have more impact?

Why put copper in between battery contacts and clamps?

Why does aggregate initialization not work anymore since C++20 if a constructor is explicitly defaulted or deleted?

Rampant sharing of authorship among colleagues in the name of "collaboration". Is not taking part in it a death knell for a future in academia?

Argand formula and more for quaternions?

Accidentally deleted everything from a directory on my Macbook using terminal

Do the books ever say oliphaunts aren’t elephants?

In syntax, why cannot we say things like "he took walked at the park"? but can say "he took a walk at the park"?

What force enables us to walk? Friction or normal reaction?

What are the closest international airports in different countries?

Is it unprofessional to mention your cover letter and resume are best viewed in Chrome?

Composing fill in the blanks

To find islands of 1 and 0 in matrix

Why did House of Representatives need to condemn Trumps Tweets?

Can Papyrus be folded?

8086 stack segment and avoiding overflow in interrupts

Alternatives to minimizing loss in regression

Why would an invisible personal shield be necessary?



Does Ubuntu reduces battery life?


Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?Should I use UPS with my laptop to extend the battery life?Some questions on laptop batteryNotebook no longer recognizes battery. What are my options?Increasing Laptop Battery Service LifePrevent i7 from overclocking while on batteryWhy wont new hard drive use battery power?Lenovo Energy Management - Battery life on dual bootBattery indicator can't refresh battery stateLaptop won't boot without power cable connectedDoes dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















This questions is loosely related to Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life? .In that question i have asked if Dual boot decrease battery life.Here i have asked does Ubuntu decreases battery life.



Does Ubuntu decreases life of battery ?I dual-booted my laptop with Ubuntu 17 and Windows 10 one year back.After one year, my laptop battery backup has reduced to 40 minutes.Answer provided in above link says dual boot does not harms battery .Hence i suspect that if might be possible that Ubuntu decreases life of battery.I don't know but i have experienced that Ubuntu drains battery faster than windows ?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 4





    No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

    – GabrielaGarcia
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

    – Ronaldo
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

    – Nobody
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    @nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

    – davidgo
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

    – user1068838
    1 hour ago


















2















This questions is loosely related to Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life? .In that question i have asked if Dual boot decrease battery life.Here i have asked does Ubuntu decreases battery life.



Does Ubuntu decreases life of battery ?I dual-booted my laptop with Ubuntu 17 and Windows 10 one year back.After one year, my laptop battery backup has reduced to 40 minutes.Answer provided in above link says dual boot does not harms battery .Hence i suspect that if might be possible that Ubuntu decreases life of battery.I don't know but i have experienced that Ubuntu drains battery faster than windows ?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 4





    No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

    – GabrielaGarcia
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

    – Ronaldo
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

    – Nobody
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    @nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

    – davidgo
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

    – user1068838
    1 hour ago














2












2








2








This questions is loosely related to Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life? .In that question i have asked if Dual boot decrease battery life.Here i have asked does Ubuntu decreases battery life.



Does Ubuntu decreases life of battery ?I dual-booted my laptop with Ubuntu 17 and Windows 10 one year back.After one year, my laptop battery backup has reduced to 40 minutes.Answer provided in above link says dual boot does not harms battery .Hence i suspect that if might be possible that Ubuntu decreases life of battery.I don't know but i have experienced that Ubuntu drains battery faster than windows ?










share|improve this question









New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











This questions is loosely related to Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life? .In that question i have asked if Dual boot decrease battery life.Here i have asked does Ubuntu decreases battery life.



Does Ubuntu decreases life of battery ?I dual-booted my laptop with Ubuntu 17 and Windows 10 one year back.After one year, my laptop battery backup has reduced to 40 minutes.Answer provided in above link says dual boot does not harms battery .Hence i suspect that if might be possible that Ubuntu decreases life of battery.I don't know but i have experienced that Ubuntu drains battery faster than windows ?







ubuntu laptop battery






share|improve this question









New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 53 mins ago







user1068838













New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 13 hours ago









user1068838user1068838

671 silver badge5 bronze badges




671 silver badge5 bronze badges




New contributor



user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




user1068838 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 4





    No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

    – GabrielaGarcia
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

    – Ronaldo
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

    – Nobody
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    @nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

    – davidgo
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

    – user1068838
    1 hour ago













  • 4





    No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

    – GabrielaGarcia
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

    – Ronaldo
    11 hours ago






  • 1





    I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

    – Nobody
    11 hours ago






  • 4





    @nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

    – davidgo
    9 hours ago






  • 1





    @Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

    – user1068838
    1 hour ago








4




4





No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

– GabrielaGarcia
11 hours ago





No, Ubuntu does NOT decrease the battery life, even if it drains it faster when used instead of Windows. It seems you selectively understood what was answered. No, dear, your battery is OLD, end of story. It happens to all batteries sooner or later. There are no software culprits here no matter how hard you're trying to find a scape goat.

– GabrielaGarcia
11 hours ago




1




1





I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

– Ronaldo
11 hours ago





I think a more reasonable cause of batery degradation would be related to the fourth topic (Don’t leave your laptop on permanent charge) in this article: link.

– Ronaldo
11 hours ago




1




1





I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

– Nobody
11 hours ago





I downvoted because you are ignoring what people write and repeat your question all over the place.

– Nobody
11 hours ago




4




4





@nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

– davidgo
9 hours ago





@nobody And I upvoted because the actual answer is a nuanced, and its valuable to the community! (I also disagree with both you and GabrielaGarcia - and Ive done a significant amount of testing and research here.)

– davidgo
9 hours ago




1




1





@Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

– user1068838
1 hour ago






@Nobody I am not repeating my question .That question was related to dual boot , here i am just asking about ubuntu .If on that place would have edited my question after i accepted the answer then it would have been unfair .Also i am not asking this question just for self benefit since my battery is already dead.It will help others too .Also you can see the answer provided by davidgo is different from the answers provided on the link .Hence my question is bit different .

– user1068838
1 hour ago











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7














Without extra care, yes, although this can be mitigated/avoided, and the main cause is just wear and tear. The problem is not Linux per-se, but the vendors focus on Windows optimizations for battery life, and heavier power draw kills a battery faster.



The main things which degrade a rechargeable Lithium based battery are:



  • Heavy discharge

  • Full charge, particularly keeping full charge.

  • Number of charge/discharge cycles

  • Heat

  • Storing battery fully charged/Discharge.

  • Age - maximum capacity of a perfectly maintained battery still decreases with age.

Because Linux is heavier on battery then Windows, the amount of heat is higher, causing faster wear. Similarly you likely have more charge/discharge cycles because battery us used more.



Some mitigations/trade-offs to improve battery -



  1. If your BIOS supports it, set maximum charge to less the 80% (or even 70%) - shorter work time, much longer battery life in net terms.

  2. Use powertop to reduce power draw.

  3. If you are a road warrior, try charging when you are not using laptop to reduce heat. Likewise a slower charger will do less damage.
    3a. It seems discharging from 80-40% once is less stressful then discharging 80-60% twice.

  4. Don't let your battery level fall below 20%

  5. Try keep the laptop comfortably cool. Leaving it on in a backpack causes heat buildup.

  6. Slow charging and/or using a larger battery causes less wear for a similar amount of usage because it helps with the above.

(Where numbers are used above they are indicative only)






share|improve this answer


































    4














    Good answer by davidgo, and that should be your starting point for understanding and minimizing the issue. But the wording of the question implies that you're thinking about this in a slightly wrong way, and I'll focus on that aspect.



    You keep referring to Ubuntu "decreasing" battery life, and that's not really an appropriate way to look at it. Say one OS is better than another at optimizing battery life. If you use the better one as a baseline, the other OS won't be as good in that respect, so it kinda looks like battery life is "decreased" in relative terms.



    But really, "batteries decrease battery life". When batteries are a source of power, any battery is a disposable item. Everything you do or don't do affects battery life a little. davidgo's answer lists the major factors.



    If one OS uses a little more power than another, that might lead to recharging more often. So some factors can affect other factors. But if you get the daily run time you need even with the OS that uses more power, you might recharge at the same frequency and from a discharge level that, for practical purposes, is in the same range. So your usage pattern may be a bigger factor than the OS.



    The point is that batteries have a finite life. There are things you can do to optimize and extend the life a little. To the extent it's practical to do those things, they can't hurt. But finite battery life is a characteristic of operating from batteries. In the scheme of things, a few months difference in battery life doesn't represent a big cost. It doesn't make sense to let it drive important decisions.



    You own the computer because it is a tool to help you accomplish things important to you. People spend extra money to get a keyboard or mouse that they can use more efficiently, or a high-resolution monitor so they can see more of their work at once. The same applies to the OS. You pick an OS because of what it allows you to do, and things like the user interface that make it easier for you to get your work done. You don't pick it because one will save you a few dollars every couple of years on battery replacement. For that matter, if you are comparing Windows and Ubuntu, Windows costs money and Ubuntu is free. So if Windows saves you a few dollars on battery replacement, you've already paid money for that.



    Ubuntu doesn't "reduce" battery life. It might yield a slightly different life. But as they say, "that's life".






    share|improve this answer

























    • You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

      – user1068838
      1 hour ago


















    0














    No.



    How fast the capacity of a battery drops over usage cycles is largely independent of the software running on the laptop. It mostly depends on amount of charge cycles, average relative charge amount, temperature, battery controller (which is not part of the operating system) and a bunch of other factors.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

      – davidgo
      9 hours ago













    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "3"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    user1068838 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1465822%2fdoes-ubuntu-reduces-battery-life%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    Without extra care, yes, although this can be mitigated/avoided, and the main cause is just wear and tear. The problem is not Linux per-se, but the vendors focus on Windows optimizations for battery life, and heavier power draw kills a battery faster.



    The main things which degrade a rechargeable Lithium based battery are:



    • Heavy discharge

    • Full charge, particularly keeping full charge.

    • Number of charge/discharge cycles

    • Heat

    • Storing battery fully charged/Discharge.

    • Age - maximum capacity of a perfectly maintained battery still decreases with age.

    Because Linux is heavier on battery then Windows, the amount of heat is higher, causing faster wear. Similarly you likely have more charge/discharge cycles because battery us used more.



    Some mitigations/trade-offs to improve battery -



    1. If your BIOS supports it, set maximum charge to less the 80% (or even 70%) - shorter work time, much longer battery life in net terms.

    2. Use powertop to reduce power draw.

    3. If you are a road warrior, try charging when you are not using laptop to reduce heat. Likewise a slower charger will do less damage.
      3a. It seems discharging from 80-40% once is less stressful then discharging 80-60% twice.

    4. Don't let your battery level fall below 20%

    5. Try keep the laptop comfortably cool. Leaving it on in a backpack causes heat buildup.

    6. Slow charging and/or using a larger battery causes less wear for a similar amount of usage because it helps with the above.

    (Where numbers are used above they are indicative only)






    share|improve this answer































      7














      Without extra care, yes, although this can be mitigated/avoided, and the main cause is just wear and tear. The problem is not Linux per-se, but the vendors focus on Windows optimizations for battery life, and heavier power draw kills a battery faster.



      The main things which degrade a rechargeable Lithium based battery are:



      • Heavy discharge

      • Full charge, particularly keeping full charge.

      • Number of charge/discharge cycles

      • Heat

      • Storing battery fully charged/Discharge.

      • Age - maximum capacity of a perfectly maintained battery still decreases with age.

      Because Linux is heavier on battery then Windows, the amount of heat is higher, causing faster wear. Similarly you likely have more charge/discharge cycles because battery us used more.



      Some mitigations/trade-offs to improve battery -



      1. If your BIOS supports it, set maximum charge to less the 80% (or even 70%) - shorter work time, much longer battery life in net terms.

      2. Use powertop to reduce power draw.

      3. If you are a road warrior, try charging when you are not using laptop to reduce heat. Likewise a slower charger will do less damage.
        3a. It seems discharging from 80-40% once is less stressful then discharging 80-60% twice.

      4. Don't let your battery level fall below 20%

      5. Try keep the laptop comfortably cool. Leaving it on in a backpack causes heat buildup.

      6. Slow charging and/or using a larger battery causes less wear for a similar amount of usage because it helps with the above.

      (Where numbers are used above they are indicative only)






      share|improve this answer





























        7












        7








        7







        Without extra care, yes, although this can be mitigated/avoided, and the main cause is just wear and tear. The problem is not Linux per-se, but the vendors focus on Windows optimizations for battery life, and heavier power draw kills a battery faster.



        The main things which degrade a rechargeable Lithium based battery are:



        • Heavy discharge

        • Full charge, particularly keeping full charge.

        • Number of charge/discharge cycles

        • Heat

        • Storing battery fully charged/Discharge.

        • Age - maximum capacity of a perfectly maintained battery still decreases with age.

        Because Linux is heavier on battery then Windows, the amount of heat is higher, causing faster wear. Similarly you likely have more charge/discharge cycles because battery us used more.



        Some mitigations/trade-offs to improve battery -



        1. If your BIOS supports it, set maximum charge to less the 80% (or even 70%) - shorter work time, much longer battery life in net terms.

        2. Use powertop to reduce power draw.

        3. If you are a road warrior, try charging when you are not using laptop to reduce heat. Likewise a slower charger will do less damage.
          3a. It seems discharging from 80-40% once is less stressful then discharging 80-60% twice.

        4. Don't let your battery level fall below 20%

        5. Try keep the laptop comfortably cool. Leaving it on in a backpack causes heat buildup.

        6. Slow charging and/or using a larger battery causes less wear for a similar amount of usage because it helps with the above.

        (Where numbers are used above they are indicative only)






        share|improve this answer















        Without extra care, yes, although this can be mitigated/avoided, and the main cause is just wear and tear. The problem is not Linux per-se, but the vendors focus on Windows optimizations for battery life, and heavier power draw kills a battery faster.



        The main things which degrade a rechargeable Lithium based battery are:



        • Heavy discharge

        • Full charge, particularly keeping full charge.

        • Number of charge/discharge cycles

        • Heat

        • Storing battery fully charged/Discharge.

        • Age - maximum capacity of a perfectly maintained battery still decreases with age.

        Because Linux is heavier on battery then Windows, the amount of heat is higher, causing faster wear. Similarly you likely have more charge/discharge cycles because battery us used more.



        Some mitigations/trade-offs to improve battery -



        1. If your BIOS supports it, set maximum charge to less the 80% (or even 70%) - shorter work time, much longer battery life in net terms.

        2. Use powertop to reduce power draw.

        3. If you are a road warrior, try charging when you are not using laptop to reduce heat. Likewise a slower charger will do less damage.
          3a. It seems discharging from 80-40% once is less stressful then discharging 80-60% twice.

        4. Don't let your battery level fall below 20%

        5. Try keep the laptop comfortably cool. Leaving it on in a backpack causes heat buildup.

        6. Slow charging and/or using a larger battery causes less wear for a similar amount of usage because it helps with the above.

        (Where numbers are used above they are indicative only)







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago

























        answered 9 hours ago









        davidgodavidgo

        47.1k7 gold badges60 silver badges97 bronze badges




        47.1k7 gold badges60 silver badges97 bronze badges


























            4














            Good answer by davidgo, and that should be your starting point for understanding and minimizing the issue. But the wording of the question implies that you're thinking about this in a slightly wrong way, and I'll focus on that aspect.



            You keep referring to Ubuntu "decreasing" battery life, and that's not really an appropriate way to look at it. Say one OS is better than another at optimizing battery life. If you use the better one as a baseline, the other OS won't be as good in that respect, so it kinda looks like battery life is "decreased" in relative terms.



            But really, "batteries decrease battery life". When batteries are a source of power, any battery is a disposable item. Everything you do or don't do affects battery life a little. davidgo's answer lists the major factors.



            If one OS uses a little more power than another, that might lead to recharging more often. So some factors can affect other factors. But if you get the daily run time you need even with the OS that uses more power, you might recharge at the same frequency and from a discharge level that, for practical purposes, is in the same range. So your usage pattern may be a bigger factor than the OS.



            The point is that batteries have a finite life. There are things you can do to optimize and extend the life a little. To the extent it's practical to do those things, they can't hurt. But finite battery life is a characteristic of operating from batteries. In the scheme of things, a few months difference in battery life doesn't represent a big cost. It doesn't make sense to let it drive important decisions.



            You own the computer because it is a tool to help you accomplish things important to you. People spend extra money to get a keyboard or mouse that they can use more efficiently, or a high-resolution monitor so they can see more of their work at once. The same applies to the OS. You pick an OS because of what it allows you to do, and things like the user interface that make it easier for you to get your work done. You don't pick it because one will save you a few dollars every couple of years on battery replacement. For that matter, if you are comparing Windows and Ubuntu, Windows costs money and Ubuntu is free. So if Windows saves you a few dollars on battery replacement, you've already paid money for that.



            Ubuntu doesn't "reduce" battery life. It might yield a slightly different life. But as they say, "that's life".






            share|improve this answer

























            • You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

              – user1068838
              1 hour ago















            4














            Good answer by davidgo, and that should be your starting point for understanding and minimizing the issue. But the wording of the question implies that you're thinking about this in a slightly wrong way, and I'll focus on that aspect.



            You keep referring to Ubuntu "decreasing" battery life, and that's not really an appropriate way to look at it. Say one OS is better than another at optimizing battery life. If you use the better one as a baseline, the other OS won't be as good in that respect, so it kinda looks like battery life is "decreased" in relative terms.



            But really, "batteries decrease battery life". When batteries are a source of power, any battery is a disposable item. Everything you do or don't do affects battery life a little. davidgo's answer lists the major factors.



            If one OS uses a little more power than another, that might lead to recharging more often. So some factors can affect other factors. But if you get the daily run time you need even with the OS that uses more power, you might recharge at the same frequency and from a discharge level that, for practical purposes, is in the same range. So your usage pattern may be a bigger factor than the OS.



            The point is that batteries have a finite life. There are things you can do to optimize and extend the life a little. To the extent it's practical to do those things, they can't hurt. But finite battery life is a characteristic of operating from batteries. In the scheme of things, a few months difference in battery life doesn't represent a big cost. It doesn't make sense to let it drive important decisions.



            You own the computer because it is a tool to help you accomplish things important to you. People spend extra money to get a keyboard or mouse that they can use more efficiently, or a high-resolution monitor so they can see more of their work at once. The same applies to the OS. You pick an OS because of what it allows you to do, and things like the user interface that make it easier for you to get your work done. You don't pick it because one will save you a few dollars every couple of years on battery replacement. For that matter, if you are comparing Windows and Ubuntu, Windows costs money and Ubuntu is free. So if Windows saves you a few dollars on battery replacement, you've already paid money for that.



            Ubuntu doesn't "reduce" battery life. It might yield a slightly different life. But as they say, "that's life".






            share|improve this answer

























            • You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

              – user1068838
              1 hour ago













            4












            4








            4







            Good answer by davidgo, and that should be your starting point for understanding and minimizing the issue. But the wording of the question implies that you're thinking about this in a slightly wrong way, and I'll focus on that aspect.



            You keep referring to Ubuntu "decreasing" battery life, and that's not really an appropriate way to look at it. Say one OS is better than another at optimizing battery life. If you use the better one as a baseline, the other OS won't be as good in that respect, so it kinda looks like battery life is "decreased" in relative terms.



            But really, "batteries decrease battery life". When batteries are a source of power, any battery is a disposable item. Everything you do or don't do affects battery life a little. davidgo's answer lists the major factors.



            If one OS uses a little more power than another, that might lead to recharging more often. So some factors can affect other factors. But if you get the daily run time you need even with the OS that uses more power, you might recharge at the same frequency and from a discharge level that, for practical purposes, is in the same range. So your usage pattern may be a bigger factor than the OS.



            The point is that batteries have a finite life. There are things you can do to optimize and extend the life a little. To the extent it's practical to do those things, they can't hurt. But finite battery life is a characteristic of operating from batteries. In the scheme of things, a few months difference in battery life doesn't represent a big cost. It doesn't make sense to let it drive important decisions.



            You own the computer because it is a tool to help you accomplish things important to you. People spend extra money to get a keyboard or mouse that they can use more efficiently, or a high-resolution monitor so they can see more of their work at once. The same applies to the OS. You pick an OS because of what it allows you to do, and things like the user interface that make it easier for you to get your work done. You don't pick it because one will save you a few dollars every couple of years on battery replacement. For that matter, if you are comparing Windows and Ubuntu, Windows costs money and Ubuntu is free. So if Windows saves you a few dollars on battery replacement, you've already paid money for that.



            Ubuntu doesn't "reduce" battery life. It might yield a slightly different life. But as they say, "that's life".






            share|improve this answer













            Good answer by davidgo, and that should be your starting point for understanding and minimizing the issue. But the wording of the question implies that you're thinking about this in a slightly wrong way, and I'll focus on that aspect.



            You keep referring to Ubuntu "decreasing" battery life, and that's not really an appropriate way to look at it. Say one OS is better than another at optimizing battery life. If you use the better one as a baseline, the other OS won't be as good in that respect, so it kinda looks like battery life is "decreased" in relative terms.



            But really, "batteries decrease battery life". When batteries are a source of power, any battery is a disposable item. Everything you do or don't do affects battery life a little. davidgo's answer lists the major factors.



            If one OS uses a little more power than another, that might lead to recharging more often. So some factors can affect other factors. But if you get the daily run time you need even with the OS that uses more power, you might recharge at the same frequency and from a discharge level that, for practical purposes, is in the same range. So your usage pattern may be a bigger factor than the OS.



            The point is that batteries have a finite life. There are things you can do to optimize and extend the life a little. To the extent it's practical to do those things, they can't hurt. But finite battery life is a characteristic of operating from batteries. In the scheme of things, a few months difference in battery life doesn't represent a big cost. It doesn't make sense to let it drive important decisions.



            You own the computer because it is a tool to help you accomplish things important to you. People spend extra money to get a keyboard or mouse that they can use more efficiently, or a high-resolution monitor so they can see more of their work at once. The same applies to the OS. You pick an OS because of what it allows you to do, and things like the user interface that make it easier for you to get your work done. You don't pick it because one will save you a few dollars every couple of years on battery replacement. For that matter, if you are comparing Windows and Ubuntu, Windows costs money and Ubuntu is free. So if Windows saves you a few dollars on battery replacement, you've already paid money for that.



            Ubuntu doesn't "reduce" battery life. It might yield a slightly different life. But as they say, "that's life".







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 7 hours ago









            fixer1234fixer1234

            21.4k14 gold badges53 silver badges87 bronze badges




            21.4k14 gold badges53 silver badges87 bronze badges















            • You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

              – user1068838
              1 hour ago

















            • You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

              – user1068838
              1 hour ago
















            You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

            – user1068838
            1 hour ago





            You are right .My most of work is on Ubuntu and i like it .I will not remove it for saving few dollars :)

            – user1068838
            1 hour ago











            0














            No.



            How fast the capacity of a battery drops over usage cycles is largely independent of the software running on the laptop. It mostly depends on amount of charge cycles, average relative charge amount, temperature, battery controller (which is not part of the operating system) and a bunch of other factors.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 3





              This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

              – davidgo
              9 hours ago















            0














            No.



            How fast the capacity of a battery drops over usage cycles is largely independent of the software running on the laptop. It mostly depends on amount of charge cycles, average relative charge amount, temperature, battery controller (which is not part of the operating system) and a bunch of other factors.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 3





              This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

              – davidgo
              9 hours ago













            0












            0








            0







            No.



            How fast the capacity of a battery drops over usage cycles is largely independent of the software running on the laptop. It mostly depends on amount of charge cycles, average relative charge amount, temperature, battery controller (which is not part of the operating system) and a bunch of other factors.






            share|improve this answer













            No.



            How fast the capacity of a battery drops over usage cycles is largely independent of the software running on the laptop. It mostly depends on amount of charge cycles, average relative charge amount, temperature, battery controller (which is not part of the operating system) and a bunch of other factors.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 11 hours ago









            NobodyNobody

            1778 bronze badges




            1778 bronze badges










            • 3





              This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

              – davidgo
              9 hours ago












            • 3





              This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

              – davidgo
              9 hours ago







            3




            3





            This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

            – davidgo
            9 hours ago





            This is wrong because Typicsl Linux (but not Android) is way heavier on battery then Windows because vendors optimise for Windows and ignore Linux. This is well documented, and unsurprisingly the experience of the OP as stated.

            – davidgo
            9 hours ago










            user1068838 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            user1068838 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            user1068838 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            user1068838 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Super User!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsuperuser.com%2fquestions%2f1465822%2fdoes-ubuntu-reduces-battery-life%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

            Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

            Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)