Polynomial satisfying a relation for all positive integersCalculate the Gauss integral without squaring it firstFind a nontrivial unit polynomial in $mathbb Z_4[x]$Ideas and methods in deciding solvability of rational expression equals integerA lot of confusion in the “Polynomial Remainder Theorem”?$N|K$ normal $Rightarrow F in K[X]$ factors into $F=Q_1cdots Q_r$ with $textdeg(Q_1)=dots=textdeg(Q_r)$Is there a generalization for the inverse of certain kinds of polynomials, if not for all?$[F:mathbbQ]$ where $F$ is splitting field over $mathbbQ$ of $f = x^3 + x^2 + 1$Formula for $1/f(x)$ where $f$ is a polynomialIf two polynomials over integers are equivalent, are the same polynomial expressions defined over positive integers also equivalent?Proof verification of if $x_n$ is monotone then $y_n = 1over x_1 + x_2 + dots + x_n$ is monotone

How to have poached eggs in "sphere form"?

Would people understand me speaking German all over Europe?

How to efficiently shred a lot of cabbage?

What would the United Kingdom's "optimal" Brexit deal look like?

Why does Canada require bilingualism in a lot of federal government posts?

Complaints from (junior) developers against solution architects: how can we show the benefits of our work and improve relationships?

Little Lost Robot

Antonym of "Megalomania"

Does Ubuntu reduces battery life?

What do I lose by going Paladin 17 / Warlock 3, instead of taking 1 additional level or 1 fewer level in Warlock?

Why were contact sensors put on three of the Lunar Module's four legs? Did they ever bend and stick out sideways?

how to understand the error info "Illegal parameter number in definition of reserved@a. ...t2+cdots+sqrt2}}_n项 , cdots 收敛.$}"

In syntax, why cannot we say things like "he took walked at the park"? but can say "he took a walk at the park"?

Did Vladimir Lenin have a cat?

Is it okay for me to decline a project on ethical grounds?

Argand formula and more for quaternions?

Why tantalum for the Hayabusa bullets?

How to store my pliers and wire cutters on my desk?

Is every compact set is closed in any topological space?

Do 3/8 (37.5%) of Quadratics Have No x-Intercepts?

Why would an invisible personal shield be necessary?

Does dual boot harm a laptop battery or reduce its life?

Boots or trail runners with reference to blisters?

Is it safe if the neutral lead is exposed and disconnected?



Polynomial satisfying a relation for all positive integers


Calculate the Gauss integral without squaring it firstFind a nontrivial unit polynomial in $mathbb Z_4[x]$Ideas and methods in deciding solvability of rational expression equals integerA lot of confusion in the “Polynomial Remainder Theorem”?$N|K$ normal $Rightarrow F in K[X]$ factors into $F=Q_1cdots Q_r$ with $textdeg(Q_1)=dots=textdeg(Q_r)$Is there a generalization for the inverse of certain kinds of polynomials, if not for all?$[F:mathbbQ]$ where $F$ is splitting field over $mathbbQ$ of $f = x^3 + x^2 + 1$Formula for $1/f(x)$ where $f$ is a polynomialIf two polynomials over integers are equivalent, are the same polynomial expressions defined over positive integers also equivalent?Proof verification of if $x_n$ is monotone then $y_n = 1over x_1 + x_2 + dots + x_n$ is monotone






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$



Let $P in mathbbR[X]$ such that $$P(1)+P(2)+dots+P(n)=n^5,$$
$forall nin mathbbN$. Compute $Pleft(frac32right)$.




I think that from that relation it is mandatory that $deg P=5$, but from the given relation we also have that $P(1)+P(2)+...+P(n-1)=(n-1)^5$, so it follows that $P(n)=n^5-(n-1)^5,forall nin mathbbN$, so $deg P=4$.

I know that this only holds for positive integers, but it still seems kind of contradictory to me. Anyway, I don't know if any of my ideas actually help to solve the actual task, so I am looking forward to seeing your ideas.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Even if you assumed $deg P(x)=5$, you have a number of values to interpolate to determine the six required coefficients. It would turn out a posteriori that the coefficient of $x^5$ is zero. The summation here acts much like an integration, raising the degree of $P$ by one.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    4 hours ago


















5












$begingroup$



Let $P in mathbbR[X]$ such that $$P(1)+P(2)+dots+P(n)=n^5,$$
$forall nin mathbbN$. Compute $Pleft(frac32right)$.




I think that from that relation it is mandatory that $deg P=5$, but from the given relation we also have that $P(1)+P(2)+...+P(n-1)=(n-1)^5$, so it follows that $P(n)=n^5-(n-1)^5,forall nin mathbbN$, so $deg P=4$.

I know that this only holds for positive integers, but it still seems kind of contradictory to me. Anyway, I don't know if any of my ideas actually help to solve the actual task, so I am looking forward to seeing your ideas.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Even if you assumed $deg P(x)=5$, you have a number of values to interpolate to determine the six required coefficients. It would turn out a posteriori that the coefficient of $x^5$ is zero. The summation here acts much like an integration, raising the degree of $P$ by one.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    4 hours ago














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$



Let $P in mathbbR[X]$ such that $$P(1)+P(2)+dots+P(n)=n^5,$$
$forall nin mathbbN$. Compute $Pleft(frac32right)$.




I think that from that relation it is mandatory that $deg P=5$, but from the given relation we also have that $P(1)+P(2)+...+P(n-1)=(n-1)^5$, so it follows that $P(n)=n^5-(n-1)^5,forall nin mathbbN$, so $deg P=4$.

I know that this only holds for positive integers, but it still seems kind of contradictory to me. Anyway, I don't know if any of my ideas actually help to solve the actual task, so I am looking forward to seeing your ideas.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Let $P in mathbbR[X]$ such that $$P(1)+P(2)+dots+P(n)=n^5,$$
$forall nin mathbbN$. Compute $Pleft(frac32right)$.




I think that from that relation it is mandatory that $deg P=5$, but from the given relation we also have that $P(1)+P(2)+...+P(n-1)=(n-1)^5$, so it follows that $P(n)=n^5-(n-1)^5,forall nin mathbbN$, so $deg P=4$.

I know that this only holds for positive integers, but it still seems kind of contradictory to me. Anyway, I don't know if any of my ideas actually help to solve the actual task, so I am looking forward to seeing your ideas.







algebra-precalculus polynomials






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 7 hours ago









J. W. Tanner

12.6k1 gold badge9 silver badges28 bronze badges




12.6k1 gold badge9 silver badges28 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









Math GuyMath Guy

3427 bronze badges




3427 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Even if you assumed $deg P(x)=5$, you have a number of values to interpolate to determine the six required coefficients. It would turn out a posteriori that the coefficient of $x^5$ is zero. The summation here acts much like an integration, raising the degree of $P$ by one.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    4 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Even if you assumed $deg P(x)=5$, you have a number of values to interpolate to determine the six required coefficients. It would turn out a posteriori that the coefficient of $x^5$ is zero. The summation here acts much like an integration, raising the degree of $P$ by one.
    $endgroup$
    – hardmath
    4 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Even if you assumed $deg P(x)=5$, you have a number of values to interpolate to determine the six required coefficients. It would turn out a posteriori that the coefficient of $x^5$ is zero. The summation here acts much like an integration, raising the degree of $P$ by one.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
Even if you assumed $deg P(x)=5$, you have a number of values to interpolate to determine the six required coefficients. It would turn out a posteriori that the coefficient of $x^5$ is zero. The summation here acts much like an integration, raising the degree of $P$ by one.
$endgroup$
– hardmath
4 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

It is not contradictory. Consider $P(x)=x$ of degree $1$ then
$$P(1)+P(2)+dots +P(n)=1+2+dots +n=fracn(n+1)2$$
which is of degree $2$. Note also that the sum has not a fixed number of terms, it increases with $n$.



As regards your specific problem, the polynomial $$P(x)-(x^5-(x-1)^5)$$ has infinite zeros, i.e. all the positive integers, so it is the zero polynomial and we may conclude that
$$P(x)=x^5-(x-1)^5.$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$






















    2












    $begingroup$

    In fact we have that
    $$
    eqalign{
    & sumlimits_k = 1^n P(k) = n^,5 quad left| ;left( 1 le right)n in N right.quad Rightarrow cr
    & Rightarrow quad left matrix
    P(1) = 1 hfill cr
    sumlimits_k = 1^n + 1 P(k) - sumlimits_k = 1^n P(k) = P(n + 1) = left( n + 1 right)^,5 - n^,5 hfill cr right.quad Rightarrow cr
    & Rightarrow quad P(n) = n^,5 - left( n - 1 right)^,5 quad left
    $$



    To solve your perplexity about $P(n)$ being of degree $4$ wrt to the sum giving a degree of $5$

    consider that the sum of a polynomial with variable upper bound produce the same effect as
    the integral: i.e. it raises the degree by $1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3308751%2fpolynomial-satisfying-a-relation-for-all-positive-integers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      5












      $begingroup$

      It is not contradictory. Consider $P(x)=x$ of degree $1$ then
      $$P(1)+P(2)+dots +P(n)=1+2+dots +n=fracn(n+1)2$$
      which is of degree $2$. Note also that the sum has not a fixed number of terms, it increases with $n$.



      As regards your specific problem, the polynomial $$P(x)-(x^5-(x-1)^5)$$ has infinite zeros, i.e. all the positive integers, so it is the zero polynomial and we may conclude that
      $$P(x)=x^5-(x-1)^5.$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



















        5












        $begingroup$

        It is not contradictory. Consider $P(x)=x$ of degree $1$ then
        $$P(1)+P(2)+dots +P(n)=1+2+dots +n=fracn(n+1)2$$
        which is of degree $2$. Note also that the sum has not a fixed number of terms, it increases with $n$.



        As regards your specific problem, the polynomial $$P(x)-(x^5-(x-1)^5)$$ has infinite zeros, i.e. all the positive integers, so it is the zero polynomial and we may conclude that
        $$P(x)=x^5-(x-1)^5.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$

















          5












          5








          5





          $begingroup$

          It is not contradictory. Consider $P(x)=x$ of degree $1$ then
          $$P(1)+P(2)+dots +P(n)=1+2+dots +n=fracn(n+1)2$$
          which is of degree $2$. Note also that the sum has not a fixed number of terms, it increases with $n$.



          As regards your specific problem, the polynomial $$P(x)-(x^5-(x-1)^5)$$ has infinite zeros, i.e. all the positive integers, so it is the zero polynomial and we may conclude that
          $$P(x)=x^5-(x-1)^5.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          It is not contradictory. Consider $P(x)=x$ of degree $1$ then
          $$P(1)+P(2)+dots +P(n)=1+2+dots +n=fracn(n+1)2$$
          which is of degree $2$. Note also that the sum has not a fixed number of terms, it increases with $n$.



          As regards your specific problem, the polynomial $$P(x)-(x^5-(x-1)^5)$$ has infinite zeros, i.e. all the positive integers, so it is the zero polynomial and we may conclude that
          $$P(x)=x^5-(x-1)^5.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 9 hours ago

























          answered 9 hours ago









          Robert ZRobert Z

          107k10 gold badges76 silver badges149 bronze badges




          107k10 gold badges76 silver badges149 bronze badges


























              2












              $begingroup$

              In fact we have that
              $$
              eqalign{
              & sumlimits_k = 1^n P(k) = n^,5 quad left| ;left( 1 le right)n in N right.quad Rightarrow cr
              & Rightarrow quad left matrix
              P(1) = 1 hfill cr
              sumlimits_k = 1^n + 1 P(k) - sumlimits_k = 1^n P(k) = P(n + 1) = left( n + 1 right)^,5 - n^,5 hfill cr right.quad Rightarrow cr
              & Rightarrow quad P(n) = n^,5 - left( n - 1 right)^,5 quad left
              $$



              To solve your perplexity about $P(n)$ being of degree $4$ wrt to the sum giving a degree of $5$

              consider that the sum of a polynomial with variable upper bound produce the same effect as
              the integral: i.e. it raises the degree by $1$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



















                2












                $begingroup$

                In fact we have that
                $$
                eqalign{
                & sumlimits_k = 1^n P(k) = n^,5 quad left| ;left( 1 le right)n in N right.quad Rightarrow cr
                & Rightarrow quad left matrix
                P(1) = 1 hfill cr
                sumlimits_k = 1^n + 1 P(k) - sumlimits_k = 1^n P(k) = P(n + 1) = left( n + 1 right)^,5 - n^,5 hfill cr right.quad Rightarrow cr
                & Rightarrow quad P(n) = n^,5 - left( n - 1 right)^,5 quad left
                $$



                To solve your perplexity about $P(n)$ being of degree $4$ wrt to the sum giving a degree of $5$

                consider that the sum of a polynomial with variable upper bound produce the same effect as
                the integral: i.e. it raises the degree by $1$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  In fact we have that
                  $$
                  eqalign{
                  & sumlimits_k = 1^n P(k) = n^,5 quad left| ;left( 1 le right)n in N right.quad Rightarrow cr
                  & Rightarrow quad left matrix
                  P(1) = 1 hfill cr
                  sumlimits_k = 1^n + 1 P(k) - sumlimits_k = 1^n P(k) = P(n + 1) = left( n + 1 right)^,5 - n^,5 hfill cr right.quad Rightarrow cr
                  & Rightarrow quad P(n) = n^,5 - left( n - 1 right)^,5 quad left
                  $$



                  To solve your perplexity about $P(n)$ being of degree $4$ wrt to the sum giving a degree of $5$

                  consider that the sum of a polynomial with variable upper bound produce the same effect as
                  the integral: i.e. it raises the degree by $1$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  In fact we have that
                  $$
                  eqalign{
                  & sumlimits_k = 1^n P(k) = n^,5 quad left| ;left( 1 le right)n in N right.quad Rightarrow cr
                  & Rightarrow quad left matrix
                  P(1) = 1 hfill cr
                  sumlimits_k = 1^n + 1 P(k) - sumlimits_k = 1^n P(k) = P(n + 1) = left( n + 1 right)^,5 - n^,5 hfill cr right.quad Rightarrow cr
                  & Rightarrow quad P(n) = n^,5 - left( n - 1 right)^,5 quad left
                  $$



                  To solve your perplexity about $P(n)$ being of degree $4$ wrt to the sum giving a degree of $5$

                  consider that the sum of a polynomial with variable upper bound produce the same effect as
                  the integral: i.e. it raises the degree by $1$.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 8 hours ago









                  G CabG Cab

                  22.6k3 gold badges13 silver badges45 bronze badges




                  22.6k3 gold badges13 silver badges45 bronze badges






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3308751%2fpolynomial-satisfying-a-relation-for-all-positive-integers%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                      Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                      19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу