Cycle of actions and voice signals on a multipitch climbAnchor without cordelette?Abandoning a multi pitch climbWhat do I do if I lose my belay plate?What to do at the top of a sport climb“Tag line”/“pull cord” for multipitch trad: what kind and when needed?Efficient and reliable method for managing a nut tool while following on a trad climb?Leader injured during multipitch trad climb, what to do?How to top belay 2 climbers at the same time on multi-pitch climb?Is there any difference between a harness used for rock climbing vs for mountaineering?What extra gear to take up a multipitch climb?
Would the USA be eligible to join the European Union?
Units of measurement, especially length, when body parts vary in size among races
Is it really Security Misconfiguration to show a version number?
Why not demand President's/candidate's financial records instead of tax returns?
What unique challenges/limitations will I face if I start a career as a pilot at 45 years old?
Did DOS zero out the BSS area when it loaded a program?
What should we do with manuals from the 80s?
Cases with long math equation
What is a "soap"?
Will using a resistor in series with a LED to control its voltage increase the total energy expenditure?
Do you "gain" 1st level?
Are there examples in Tanach of 3 or more parties having an ongoing conversation?
How can I communicate my issues with a potential date's pushy behavior?
Word for an event that will likely never happen again
How do I ask for 2-3 days per week remote work in a job interview?
Lípínguapua dopo Pêpê
A trip to the library
Is there a fallacy about "appeal to 'big words'"?
Cycle of actions and voice signals on a multipitch climb
Why is the result of ('b'+'a'+ + 'a' + 'a').toLowerCase() 'banana'?
Attacking the Hydra
How to not forget things?
Does fossil fuels use since 1990 account for half of all the fossil fuels used in history?
Is there a way to proportionalize fixed costs in a MILP?
Cycle of actions and voice signals on a multipitch climb
Anchor without cordelette?Abandoning a multi pitch climbWhat do I do if I lose my belay plate?What to do at the top of a sport climb“Tag line”/“pull cord” for multipitch trad: what kind and when needed?Efficient and reliable method for managing a nut tool while following on a trad climb?Leader injured during multipitch trad climb, what to do?How to top belay 2 climbers at the same time on multi-pitch climb?Is there any difference between a harness used for rock climbing vs for mountaineering?What extra gear to take up a multipitch climb?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?
rock-climbing mountaineering
add a comment |
When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?
rock-climbing mountaineering
add a comment |
When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?
rock-climbing mountaineering
When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?
rock-climbing mountaineering
rock-climbing mountaineering
asked 10 hours ago
Ben CrowellBen Crowell
19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges
19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.
Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.
Betty: "On belay?"
Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."
Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."
Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.
Betty: "Alice, off belay!"
Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"
Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"
Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"
Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"
Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."
Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."
For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.
add a comment |
The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:
(I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)
- Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.
- Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.
All other commands are redundant.
1
I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.
– imsodin
9 hours ago
1
Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)
– Jasper
9 hours ago
The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.
– Jasper
7 hours ago
add a comment |
@BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).
There's two safety-critical moments:
Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.
Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.
Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?
Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.
The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.
Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "395"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22858%2fcycle-of-actions-and-voice-signals-on-a-multipitch-climb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.
Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.
Betty: "On belay?"
Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."
Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."
Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.
Betty: "Alice, off belay!"
Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"
Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"
Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"
Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"
Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."
Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."
For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.
add a comment |
Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.
Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.
Betty: "On belay?"
Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."
Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."
Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.
Betty: "Alice, off belay!"
Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"
Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"
Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"
Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"
Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."
Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."
For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.
add a comment |
Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.
Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.
Betty: "On belay?"
Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."
Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."
Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.
Betty: "Alice, off belay!"
Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"
Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"
Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"
Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"
Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."
Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."
For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.
Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.
Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.
Betty: "On belay?"
Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."
Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."
Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.
Betty: "Alice, off belay!"
Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"
Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"
Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"
Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"
Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."
Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."
For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.
edited 10 hours ago
answered 10 hours ago
Ben CrowellBen Crowell
19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges
19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:
(I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)
- Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.
- Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.
All other commands are redundant.
1
I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.
– imsodin
9 hours ago
1
Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)
– Jasper
9 hours ago
The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.
– Jasper
7 hours ago
add a comment |
The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:
(I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)
- Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.
- Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.
All other commands are redundant.
1
I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.
– imsodin
9 hours ago
1
Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)
– Jasper
9 hours ago
The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.
– Jasper
7 hours ago
add a comment |
The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:
(I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)
- Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.
- Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.
All other commands are redundant.
The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:
(I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)
- Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.
- Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.
All other commands are redundant.
edited 9 hours ago
answered 9 hours ago
JasperJasper
9192 silver badges14 bronze badges
9192 silver badges14 bronze badges
1
I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.
– imsodin
9 hours ago
1
Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)
– Jasper
9 hours ago
The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.
– Jasper
7 hours ago
add a comment |
1
I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.
– imsodin
9 hours ago
1
Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)
– Jasper
9 hours ago
The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.
– Jasper
7 hours ago
1
1
I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.
– imsodin
9 hours ago
I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.
– imsodin
9 hours ago
1
1
Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)
– Jasper
9 hours ago
Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)
– Jasper
9 hours ago
The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.
– Jasper
7 hours ago
The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.
– Jasper
7 hours ago
add a comment |
@BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).
There's two safety-critical moments:
Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.
Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.
Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?
Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.
The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.
Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).
add a comment |
@BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).
There's two safety-critical moments:
Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.
Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.
Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?
Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.
The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.
Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).
add a comment |
@BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).
There's two safety-critical moments:
Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.
Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.
Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?
Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.
The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.
Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).
@BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).
There's two safety-critical moments:
Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.
Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.
Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?
Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.
The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.
Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).
answered 9 hours ago
imsodinimsodin
19.6k2 gold badges67 silver badges122 bronze badges
19.6k2 gold badges67 silver badges122 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to The Great Outdoors Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22858%2fcycle-of-actions-and-voice-signals-on-a-multipitch-climb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown