Cycle of actions and voice signals on a multipitch climbAnchor without cordelette?Abandoning a multi pitch climbWhat do I do if I lose my belay plate?What to do at the top of a sport climb“Tag line”/“pull cord” for multipitch trad: what kind and when needed?Efficient and reliable method for managing a nut tool while following on a trad climb?Leader injured during multipitch trad climb, what to do?How to top belay 2 climbers at the same time on multi-pitch climb?Is there any difference between a harness used for rock climbing vs for mountaineering?What extra gear to take up a multipitch climb?

Would the USA be eligible to join the European Union?

Units of measurement, especially length, when body parts vary in size among races

Is it really Security Misconfiguration to show a version number?

Why not demand President's/candidate's financial records instead of tax returns?

What unique challenges/limitations will I face if I start a career as a pilot at 45 years old?

Did DOS zero out the BSS area when it loaded a program?

What should we do with manuals from the 80s?

Cases with long math equation

What is a "soap"?

Will using a resistor in series with a LED to control its voltage increase the total energy expenditure?

Do you "gain" 1st level?

Are there examples in Tanach of 3 or more parties having an ongoing conversation?

How can I communicate my issues with a potential date's pushy behavior?

Word for an event that will likely never happen again

How do I ask for 2-3 days per week remote work in a job interview?

Lípínguapua dopo Pêpê

A trip to the library

Is there a fallacy about "appeal to 'big words'"?

Cycle of actions and voice signals on a multipitch climb

Why is the result of ('b'+'a'+ + 'a' + 'a').toLowerCase() 'banana'?

Attacking the Hydra

How to not forget things?

Does fossil fuels use since 1990 account for half of all the fossil fuels used in history?

Is there a way to proportionalize fixed costs in a MILP?



Cycle of actions and voice signals on a multipitch climb


Anchor without cordelette?Abandoning a multi pitch climbWhat do I do if I lose my belay plate?What to do at the top of a sport climb“Tag line”/“pull cord” for multipitch trad: what kind and when needed?Efficient and reliable method for managing a nut tool while following on a trad climb?Leader injured during multipitch trad climb, what to do?How to top belay 2 climbers at the same time on multi-pitch climb?Is there any difference between a harness used for rock climbing vs for mountaineering?What extra gear to take up a multipitch climb?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?










share|improve this question






























    3















    When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?










    share|improve this question


























      3












      3








      3








      When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?










      share|improve this question














      When climbing multipitch, what is the cycle of things you do when climbing each pitch, and what are the associated voice signals?







      rock-climbing mountaineering






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 10 hours ago









      Ben CrowellBen Crowell

      19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges




      19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.



          Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.



          Betty: "On belay?"



          Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."



          Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."



          Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.



          Betty: "Alice, off belay!"



          Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"



          Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"



          Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"



          Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"



          Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."



          Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."



          For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.






          share|improve this answer


































            3














            The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:



            (I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)



            1. Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.

            2. Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.

            All other commands are redundant.






            share|improve this answer






















            • 1





              I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

              – imsodin
              9 hours ago







            • 1





              Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

              – Jasper
              9 hours ago











            • The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

              – Jasper
              7 hours ago


















            0














            @BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).



            There's two safety-critical moments:



            1. Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.


            2. Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.


            Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?



            1. Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.


            2. The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.


            Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).






            share|improve this answer



























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "395"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22858%2fcycle-of-actions-and-voice-signals-on-a-multipitch-climb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              3














              Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.



              Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.



              Betty: "On belay?"



              Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."



              Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."



              Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.



              Betty: "Alice, off belay!"



              Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"



              Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"



              Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"



              Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"



              Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."



              Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."



              For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.






              share|improve this answer































                3














                Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.



                Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.



                Betty: "On belay?"



                Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."



                Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."



                Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.



                Betty: "Alice, off belay!"



                Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"



                Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"



                Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"



                Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"



                Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."



                Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."



                For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.






                share|improve this answer





























                  3












                  3








                  3







                  Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.



                  Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.



                  Betty: "On belay?"



                  Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."



                  Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."



                  Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.



                  Betty: "Alice, off belay!"



                  Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"



                  Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"



                  Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"



                  Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"



                  Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."



                  Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."



                  For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.






                  share|improve this answer















                  Alice and Betty are climbing in a team of two. Let's start the cycle with both climbers together at a belay, both tied in to the anchor with clove hitches. Betty is going to lead the next pitch. The standard set of voice signals in America, which I'll use below, are the ones introduced by Paul Petzoldt. When the climbers address each other by name, it's so that there won't be confusion between different teams that are near each other.



                  Betty gets together all the gear for her lead. If Alice and Betty are alternating leads, then Betty's end of the rope is already on top, and if they're using two cordelettes to construct their anchors, then Betty already has the cordelette that she cleaned from the previous anchor. If they're not swapping leads, and this will be the second pitch in a row that Betty is leading, then the rope needs to be flipped over, and Betty needs to get the other cordelette from Alice.



                  Betty: "On belay?"



                  Alice puts Betty on belay. "Belay on."



                  Betty unties her clove. As a courtesy or in case it isn't clear, she can say "Climbing," to which Alice would answer "Climb."



                  Betty does her lead, gets to the next belay station, builds an anchor, and ties in.



                  Betty: "Alice, off belay!"



                  Alice takes the rope out of her belay device. "Betty, belay off!"



                  Betty pulls up the rest of the rope. When it's taut and pulling up on Alice's harness, Alice yells, "Betty, that's me!"



                  Betty puts Alice on belay. "Alice, belay on!"



                  Alice takes the anchor apart. When she's ready to climb, she yells "Betty, climbing!" so that Betty has a heads-up to expect that she needs to start pulling up rope. Betty responds, "Alice, climb!"



                  Alice climbs the pitch, cleaning the gear. When she gets to the new anchor, she ties in. "Off belay."



                  Betty takes her off belay. "Belay off."



                  For situations where voice communication may be impossible, and the climbers may not even be able to see each other, they should discuss in advance how to handle that. Some people use systems of rope tugs, but in my experience those don't work very well. If the leader yells down "off belay" but there is no communication, then they can just pull up the rope slowly while the follower continues to feed it out through the belay device. If this type of situation is anticipated, then sometimes they will discuss this in advance, and the leader will just promise to put the follower on belay within a few minutes once the rope feels taut. If the rope may not be long enough to finish the pitch, sometimes people will agree in advance to simulclimb a short portion at the end so that the leader can reach the belay.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 10 hours ago

























                  answered 10 hours ago









                  Ben CrowellBen Crowell

                  19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges




                  19k66 silver badges128 bronze badges


























                      3














                      The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:



                      (I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)



                      1. Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.

                      2. Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.

                      All other commands are redundant.






                      share|improve this answer






















                      • 1





                        I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                        – imsodin
                        9 hours ago







                      • 1





                        Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                        – Jasper
                        9 hours ago











                      • The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                        – Jasper
                        7 hours ago















                      3














                      The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:



                      (I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)



                      1. Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.

                      2. Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.

                      All other commands are redundant.






                      share|improve this answer






















                      • 1





                        I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                        – imsodin
                        9 hours ago







                      • 1





                        Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                        – Jasper
                        9 hours ago











                      • The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                        – Jasper
                        7 hours ago













                      3












                      3








                      3







                      The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:



                      (I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)



                      1. Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.

                      2. Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.

                      All other commands are redundant.






                      share|improve this answer















                      The German mountaineer and safety expert Pit Schubert advocates to reduce the signals down to two:



                      (I'm reusing @Ben Crowell's terms since I know only the German words)



                      1. Leader to belay: "Alice, off belay" (German: "Stand!") when the leader has built their own anchor point. If there is a line of sight to the belayer, the leader may also show both hands as a clear signal that they don't need them to climb anymore.

                      2. Leader to belay: "Alice, belay on" (German: "Nachkommen!") when the leader is ready to belay the second climber.

                      All other commands are redundant.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 9 hours ago

























                      answered 9 hours ago









                      JasperJasper

                      9192 silver badges14 bronze badges




                      9192 silver badges14 bronze badges










                      • 1





                        I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                        – imsodin
                        9 hours ago







                      • 1





                        Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                        – Jasper
                        9 hours ago











                      • The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                        – Jasper
                        7 hours ago












                      • 1





                        I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                        – imsodin
                        9 hours ago







                      • 1





                        Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                        – Jasper
                        9 hours ago











                      • The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                        – Jasper
                        7 hours ago







                      1




                      1





                      I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                      – imsodin
                      9 hours ago






                      I very much disagree about the parentheses. It may not be intended, but they can be interpreted as signifying that the name is option. However the name is a non-optional part of any command, if you do give a command. I am pretty sure that Pit Schubert would agree: I don't have my copy of his Sicherheit und Risiko at hand, but I'd wager you find a case of an accident due to command mix-ups in there.

                      – imsodin
                      9 hours ago





                      1




                      1





                      Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                      – Jasper
                      9 hours ago





                      Agreed. It's on pages 202/203 :)

                      – Jasper
                      9 hours ago













                      The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                      – Jasper
                      7 hours ago





                      The parentheses were around "Alice", I've removed them.

                      – Jasper
                      7 hours ago











                      0














                      @BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).



                      There's two safety-critical moments:



                      1. Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.


                      2. Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.


                      Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?



                      1. Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.


                      2. The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.


                      Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).






                      share|improve this answer





























                        0














                        @BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).



                        There's two safety-critical moments:



                        1. Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.


                        2. Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.


                        Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?



                        1. Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.


                        2. The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.


                        Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).






                        share|improve this answer



























                          0












                          0








                          0







                          @BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).



                          There's two safety-critical moments:



                          1. Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.


                          2. Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.


                          Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?



                          1. Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.


                          2. The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.


                          Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).






                          share|improve this answer













                          @BenCrowell describes the sequence nicely and @Jasper brings up reducing commands. Due to circumstances (no visual contact and out of earshot) and simply to reduce the yelling on the mountain (both for the pleasure of silence and security, as there is less that could be misunderstood, especially on crowded sections) it is beneficial to do so. I'll give an explanation why you need no signals in the cycle to stay save (and also which signals I consider still beneficial and why).



                          There's two safety-critical moments:



                          1. Leader reaches next belay, sets it up and secures themselves -> can be taken off belay.


                          2. Leader takes second on belay after pulling up rope, such that they can clean the previous belay.


                          Now lets assume you can't give a signal as you can't see or hear each other. Rope tugging signals aren't reliable either due to rope drag. How can you ensure swift continuation of the climb while staying save?



                          1. Second just keeps belaying until the rope is up. Tedious, but save. This reduces calling "off belay" to an efficiency measure.


                          2. The leader sets up everything for the belay before pulling the rope up. Then once they feel the end of the rope, they purposely leave some slack. Then finish setting up the belay with the rope and pull in the remaining slack, tightening the rope strongly. Thus the second knows they are on belay once the rope is constantly taught. This is good practice even if you use a command, as it reduces the time the second could make a mistake without being on belay.


                          Essentially if I can give a signal, I always give the "off-belay" command, as it speeds up pulling up the rope. I don't give "on-belay" commands (except of course my rope partner explicitly requests it, in which they'll have to listen to a sermon about the virtues of not doing so after the climb :) ).







                          share|improve this answer












                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer










                          answered 9 hours ago









                          imsodinimsodin

                          19.6k2 gold badges67 silver badges122 bronze badges




                          19.6k2 gold badges67 silver badges122 bronze badges






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded
















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to The Great Outdoors Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid


                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2foutdoors.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f22858%2fcycle-of-actions-and-voice-signals-on-a-multipitch-climb%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                              Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                              Черчино Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију46°09′29″ СГШ; 9°30′29″ ИГД / 46.15809° СГШ; 9.50814° ИГД / 46.15809; 9.5081446°09′29″ СГШ; 9°30′29″ ИГД / 46.15809° СГШ; 9.50814° ИГД / 46.15809; 9.508143179111„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”Званични веб-сајтпроширитиуу