How do we calculate energy of food?Entropy and how it applies to everyday activities like eating foodRelation between Newtons and KilogramsHow much information about the scale of a waterfall can be obtained from its sound?Does ABS shorten stopping distance of a car?How do you keep a fridge full of food cooler?Can we detect whether food has previously been heated in a microwave oven?Why is ascending some stairs more exhausting than descending?Solenoid and the magnet in outer spaceElectron falling into proton approaches infinite kinetic energy why?

Thank God it's Friday, tomorrow is THE weekend. Why the definite article?

Disambiguation of "nobis vobis" and "nobis nobis"

Are there any elected officials in the U.S. who are not legislators, judges, or constitutional officers?

Would the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland be interested in reuniting?

Remarkable applications of Dickson's lemma

If all stars rotate, why was there a theory developed that requires non-rotating stars?

Is there any way to keep a player from killing an NPC?

LeetCode: Group Anagrams C#

What to say to a student who has failed?

Dealing with an extrovert co-worker

How should I face my manager if I make a mistake because a senior coworker explained something incorrectly to me?

How do I request a longer than normal leave of absence period for my wedding?

SQL Server Management Studio - Why is Dark Theme Disabled by Default?

Did a flight controller ever answer Flight with a no-go?

Immutable builder and updater

Why did this happen to Thanos's ships at the end of "Avengers: Endgame"?

How to gently end involvement with an online community?

An interview question: What's the number of String objects being created?

How to find out the average duration of the peer-review process for a given journal?

Couple of slangs I've heard when watching anime

How to make Ubuntu support single display 5120x1440 resolution?

Anatomically Correct Whomping Willow

Did the British navy fail to take into account the ballistics correction due to Coriolis force during WW1 Falkland Islands battle?

Is it possible to perform a regression where you have an unknown / unknowable feature variable?



How do we calculate energy of food?


Entropy and how it applies to everyday activities like eating foodRelation between Newtons and KilogramsHow much information about the scale of a waterfall can be obtained from its sound?Does ABS shorten stopping distance of a car?How do you keep a fridge full of food cooler?Can we detect whether food has previously been heated in a microwave oven?Why is ascending some stairs more exhausting than descending?Solenoid and the magnet in outer spaceElectron falling into proton approaches infinite kinetic energy why?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


Here is the problem, according to me:



In a classic hamburger, according to my internet research, approximately 906 kJ are contained.



Now take a car of 1 000 kilograms, and push it to 30 m/s. It has a certain kinetic energy, which is:
1 000 * 30² = 900 kJ



So does it mean that the work (in a physical sense) needed to stop the car is equivalent to the energy brought by the hamburger, so a human just have to eat an hamburger to be able to stop the car?



It is very hard to imagine, as even with the strength of an human and the possibility to brake the car very slowly, I think a human will need a lot of energy.



So how it is possible to compare the energy brought by food and the mechanical/kinetic energy?



Because on the other hand, it could also mean that with the energy brought by one hamburger (approximately 15% of the food energy is used by the human body, and the value I gave take into account this 85% factor), I am able to put push a car to 30 m/s!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



totalMongot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    youtu.be/49EaMd1fu-E
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    " It has a certain kinetic energy, which is: 1 000 * 30² = 900 kJ" The kinetic energy is actually given by $K=frac12 mv^2$. So it's 450 kJ, not 900.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Note that strength isn't the same as work. Also, work doesn't specify a time period to perform that work.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    6 hours ago


















5












$begingroup$


Here is the problem, according to me:



In a classic hamburger, according to my internet research, approximately 906 kJ are contained.



Now take a car of 1 000 kilograms, and push it to 30 m/s. It has a certain kinetic energy, which is:
1 000 * 30² = 900 kJ



So does it mean that the work (in a physical sense) needed to stop the car is equivalent to the energy brought by the hamburger, so a human just have to eat an hamburger to be able to stop the car?



It is very hard to imagine, as even with the strength of an human and the possibility to brake the car very slowly, I think a human will need a lot of energy.



So how it is possible to compare the energy brought by food and the mechanical/kinetic energy?



Because on the other hand, it could also mean that with the energy brought by one hamburger (approximately 15% of the food energy is used by the human body, and the value I gave take into account this 85% factor), I am able to put push a car to 30 m/s!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



totalMongot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    youtu.be/49EaMd1fu-E
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    " It has a certain kinetic energy, which is: 1 000 * 30² = 900 kJ" The kinetic energy is actually given by $K=frac12 mv^2$. So it's 450 kJ, not 900.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Note that strength isn't the same as work. Also, work doesn't specify a time period to perform that work.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    6 hours ago














5












5








5


1



$begingroup$


Here is the problem, according to me:



In a classic hamburger, according to my internet research, approximately 906 kJ are contained.



Now take a car of 1 000 kilograms, and push it to 30 m/s. It has a certain kinetic energy, which is:
1 000 * 30² = 900 kJ



So does it mean that the work (in a physical sense) needed to stop the car is equivalent to the energy brought by the hamburger, so a human just have to eat an hamburger to be able to stop the car?



It is very hard to imagine, as even with the strength of an human and the possibility to brake the car very slowly, I think a human will need a lot of energy.



So how it is possible to compare the energy brought by food and the mechanical/kinetic energy?



Because on the other hand, it could also mean that with the energy brought by one hamburger (approximately 15% of the food energy is used by the human body, and the value I gave take into account this 85% factor), I am able to put push a car to 30 m/s!










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



totalMongot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




Here is the problem, according to me:



In a classic hamburger, according to my internet research, approximately 906 kJ are contained.



Now take a car of 1 000 kilograms, and push it to 30 m/s. It has a certain kinetic energy, which is:
1 000 * 30² = 900 kJ



So does it mean that the work (in a physical sense) needed to stop the car is equivalent to the energy brought by the hamburger, so a human just have to eat an hamburger to be able to stop the car?



It is very hard to imagine, as even with the strength of an human and the possibility to brake the car very slowly, I think a human will need a lot of energy.



So how it is possible to compare the energy brought by food and the mechanical/kinetic energy?



Because on the other hand, it could also mean that with the energy brought by one hamburger (approximately 15% of the food energy is used by the human body, and the value I gave take into account this 85% factor), I am able to put push a car to 30 m/s!







energy everyday-life estimation food






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



totalMongot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor



totalMongot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Qmechanic

113k13 gold badges219 silver badges1336 bronze badges




113k13 gold badges219 silver badges1336 bronze badges






New contributor



totalMongot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 8 hours ago









totalMongottotalMongot

1261 bronze badge




1261 bronze badge




New contributor



totalMongot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




totalMongot is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • $begingroup$
    youtu.be/49EaMd1fu-E
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    " It has a certain kinetic energy, which is: 1 000 * 30² = 900 kJ" The kinetic energy is actually given by $K=frac12 mv^2$. So it's 450 kJ, not 900.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Note that strength isn't the same as work. Also, work doesn't specify a time period to perform that work.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    6 hours ago

















  • $begingroup$
    youtu.be/49EaMd1fu-E
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    " It has a certain kinetic energy, which is: 1 000 * 30² = 900 kJ" The kinetic energy is actually given by $K=frac12 mv^2$. So it's 450 kJ, not 900.
    $endgroup$
    – Gert
    7 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Note that strength isn't the same as work. Also, work doesn't specify a time period to perform that work.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    6 hours ago
















$begingroup$
youtu.be/49EaMd1fu-E
$endgroup$
– Gert
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
youtu.be/49EaMd1fu-E
$endgroup$
– Gert
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
" It has a certain kinetic energy, which is: 1 000 * 30² = 900 kJ" The kinetic energy is actually given by $K=frac12 mv^2$. So it's 450 kJ, not 900.
$endgroup$
– Gert
7 hours ago




$begingroup$
" It has a certain kinetic energy, which is: 1 000 * 30² = 900 kJ" The kinetic energy is actually given by $K=frac12 mv^2$. So it's 450 kJ, not 900.
$endgroup$
– Gert
7 hours ago












$begingroup$
Note that strength isn't the same as work. Also, work doesn't specify a time period to perform that work.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
6 hours ago





$begingroup$
Note that strength isn't the same as work. Also, work doesn't specify a time period to perform that work.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
6 hours ago











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4













$begingroup$

There's something you're overlooking that makes the whole thing somewhat counter-intuitive: the maximum force the human can exert on the car.



In order to reach the kinetic energy of $450mathrmkJ$ that same amount of work $W$ has to be done on the car by the human, according to:



$$W=K$$



where:



$$mathbfdW=Fmathbfdx$$



Here $F$ is the force exerted by the human (we'll assume it constant, for simplicity's sake) and $mathbfdx$ the displacement (considered linear, for simplicity's sake). Integrating we get:



$$W=FDelta x$$



and:



$$FDelta x=frac12 mv^2$$



Or:



$$Delta x=fracm v^22F$$



Obviously if $F$ is relatively small compared to $mv^2$, $Delta x$ will be large. However that doesn't mean the human won't get the car up to speed: it just takes quite a long time.



It's similar if we made the car tow a fully loaded $20$ tonnes HGV: the car can do it but it would take an impractical amount of time because the maximum amount of force it can deliver is small compared to that of an HGV tractor.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$






















    1













    $begingroup$

    It isn't so far fetched as it might appear. A gallon of gas will accelerate the car to speed and keep it there for perhaps 30 miles. The energy in gas comes from chemical bonds. The bonds in gas are not totally different from the bonds in a hamburger.



    Burning a gallon of gas produces 132,000 BTU, or $1.39 times 10^8$ J. That is ~150 times more than the 900,000 J from burning a hamburger. Given the relative sizes, it sounds like gas has more energy per pound. So a hamburger has enough energy to run a car for about 0.2 miles.



    Eating a hamburger for lunch produces enough energy to run a human until dinner. Over the course of an afternoon, a human could do enough work to push the car up to speed. Perhaps he could pedal a bicycle connected to a generator, and store the energy in batteries. Then the batteries might well have enough charge to get an electric car up to speed.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$














    • $begingroup$
      Interesting. But the way the hamburger is "burnt" in the human body is not the same as a gallon of gas is literrally "burnt" in a motor But my understanding is that there are some bounds more or less stable: gas bounds are less stable than hamburger bounds so more energy could be extracted from. So is there any reason that could be added to say that the energy at the end would not be the same?
      $endgroup$
      – totalMongot
      6 hours ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      It actually isn't that different. In both cases, fuel is combined with oxygen to produce CO2 and H2O. It just happens slower in a human. It produces heat, which keeps our body temperature at 98.6. But not the flame you get from running the reactions faster, or the explosion from faster still.
      $endgroup$
      – mmesser314
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy he got from the processing and use them at a time to push to 30 m/s the car?
      $endgroup$
      – totalMongot
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Sure. He could use a bicycle connected to a generator as mentioned in the answer.
      $endgroup$
      – mmesser314
      6 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy Not strictly all of it because some is needed for vital functions. But energy is energy is energy....
      $endgroup$
      – Gert
      6 hours ago


















    0













    $begingroup$

    The whole scenario seems to be implausible when you consider that in order for the person to accelerate the vehicle to a speed of 30 m/s at the end the person would have to run at a pace of 70 mph!



    As to the food calories burned:



    According to one site an average person's straight pushing force is 60-80 N. Assuming 80 N and a 1000 kg car (2200 lb), which is a fairly light compared to the average, and negligible friction between the car and road, the car's acceleration would be 0.08$fracms^2$. That means it would take 6.26 minutes to reach 30 m/s and do 450 kJ of mechanical work.



    Another site mentioned that human energy efficiency in converting food energy into mechanical output is about 25%. So the required food energy would be 450/.25, or 1800 kJ.



    Hope this helps.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$






















      0













      $begingroup$

      A calorimeter is a device that you can use to measure energy of food, You put a small amount of the food in a calorimeter. Then you submerge the calorimeter in a known quantity of water. Now you vaporize the food and measure the increase in temperature of the water. By careful measurements one can determine the energy required to heat the water. That amount of heat is the caloric content of that food.



      Once you know the energy of the food you can compare it to other material objects just by calculating the energy of the objects. Kinetic energy is just $$(1/2) mv^2$$






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "151"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        totalMongot is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f498379%2fhow-do-we-calculate-energy-of-food%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        4













        $begingroup$

        There's something you're overlooking that makes the whole thing somewhat counter-intuitive: the maximum force the human can exert on the car.



        In order to reach the kinetic energy of $450mathrmkJ$ that same amount of work $W$ has to be done on the car by the human, according to:



        $$W=K$$



        where:



        $$mathbfdW=Fmathbfdx$$



        Here $F$ is the force exerted by the human (we'll assume it constant, for simplicity's sake) and $mathbfdx$ the displacement (considered linear, for simplicity's sake). Integrating we get:



        $$W=FDelta x$$



        and:



        $$FDelta x=frac12 mv^2$$



        Or:



        $$Delta x=fracm v^22F$$



        Obviously if $F$ is relatively small compared to $mv^2$, $Delta x$ will be large. However that doesn't mean the human won't get the car up to speed: it just takes quite a long time.



        It's similar if we made the car tow a fully loaded $20$ tonnes HGV: the car can do it but it would take an impractical amount of time because the maximum amount of force it can deliver is small compared to that of an HGV tractor.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



















          4













          $begingroup$

          There's something you're overlooking that makes the whole thing somewhat counter-intuitive: the maximum force the human can exert on the car.



          In order to reach the kinetic energy of $450mathrmkJ$ that same amount of work $W$ has to be done on the car by the human, according to:



          $$W=K$$



          where:



          $$mathbfdW=Fmathbfdx$$



          Here $F$ is the force exerted by the human (we'll assume it constant, for simplicity's sake) and $mathbfdx$ the displacement (considered linear, for simplicity's sake). Integrating we get:



          $$W=FDelta x$$



          and:



          $$FDelta x=frac12 mv^2$$



          Or:



          $$Delta x=fracm v^22F$$



          Obviously if $F$ is relatively small compared to $mv^2$, $Delta x$ will be large. However that doesn't mean the human won't get the car up to speed: it just takes quite a long time.



          It's similar if we made the car tow a fully loaded $20$ tonnes HGV: the car can do it but it would take an impractical amount of time because the maximum amount of force it can deliver is small compared to that of an HGV tractor.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$

















            4














            4










            4







            $begingroup$

            There's something you're overlooking that makes the whole thing somewhat counter-intuitive: the maximum force the human can exert on the car.



            In order to reach the kinetic energy of $450mathrmkJ$ that same amount of work $W$ has to be done on the car by the human, according to:



            $$W=K$$



            where:



            $$mathbfdW=Fmathbfdx$$



            Here $F$ is the force exerted by the human (we'll assume it constant, for simplicity's sake) and $mathbfdx$ the displacement (considered linear, for simplicity's sake). Integrating we get:



            $$W=FDelta x$$



            and:



            $$FDelta x=frac12 mv^2$$



            Or:



            $$Delta x=fracm v^22F$$



            Obviously if $F$ is relatively small compared to $mv^2$, $Delta x$ will be large. However that doesn't mean the human won't get the car up to speed: it just takes quite a long time.



            It's similar if we made the car tow a fully loaded $20$ tonnes HGV: the car can do it but it would take an impractical amount of time because the maximum amount of force it can deliver is small compared to that of an HGV tractor.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            There's something you're overlooking that makes the whole thing somewhat counter-intuitive: the maximum force the human can exert on the car.



            In order to reach the kinetic energy of $450mathrmkJ$ that same amount of work $W$ has to be done on the car by the human, according to:



            $$W=K$$



            where:



            $$mathbfdW=Fmathbfdx$$



            Here $F$ is the force exerted by the human (we'll assume it constant, for simplicity's sake) and $mathbfdx$ the displacement (considered linear, for simplicity's sake). Integrating we get:



            $$W=FDelta x$$



            and:



            $$FDelta x=frac12 mv^2$$



            Or:



            $$Delta x=fracm v^22F$$



            Obviously if $F$ is relatively small compared to $mv^2$, $Delta x$ will be large. However that doesn't mean the human won't get the car up to speed: it just takes quite a long time.



            It's similar if we made the car tow a fully loaded $20$ tonnes HGV: the car can do it but it would take an impractical amount of time because the maximum amount of force it can deliver is small compared to that of an HGV tractor.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 6 hours ago









            GertGert

            18.6k5 gold badges32 silver badges64 bronze badges




            18.6k5 gold badges32 silver badges64 bronze badges


























                1













                $begingroup$

                It isn't so far fetched as it might appear. A gallon of gas will accelerate the car to speed and keep it there for perhaps 30 miles. The energy in gas comes from chemical bonds. The bonds in gas are not totally different from the bonds in a hamburger.



                Burning a gallon of gas produces 132,000 BTU, or $1.39 times 10^8$ J. That is ~150 times more than the 900,000 J from burning a hamburger. Given the relative sizes, it sounds like gas has more energy per pound. So a hamburger has enough energy to run a car for about 0.2 miles.



                Eating a hamburger for lunch produces enough energy to run a human until dinner. Over the course of an afternoon, a human could do enough work to push the car up to speed. Perhaps he could pedal a bicycle connected to a generator, and store the energy in batteries. Then the batteries might well have enough charge to get an electric car up to speed.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$














                • $begingroup$
                  Interesting. But the way the hamburger is "burnt" in the human body is not the same as a gallon of gas is literrally "burnt" in a motor But my understanding is that there are some bounds more or less stable: gas bounds are less stable than hamburger bounds so more energy could be extracted from. So is there any reason that could be added to say that the energy at the end would not be the same?
                  $endgroup$
                  – totalMongot
                  6 hours ago







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  It actually isn't that different. In both cases, fuel is combined with oxygen to produce CO2 and H2O. It just happens slower in a human. It produces heat, which keeps our body temperature at 98.6. But not the flame you get from running the reactions faster, or the explosion from faster still.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mmesser314
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy he got from the processing and use them at a time to push to 30 m/s the car?
                  $endgroup$
                  – totalMongot
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  Sure. He could use a bicycle connected to a generator as mentioned in the answer.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mmesser314
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy Not strictly all of it because some is needed for vital functions. But energy is energy is energy....
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gert
                  6 hours ago















                1













                $begingroup$

                It isn't so far fetched as it might appear. A gallon of gas will accelerate the car to speed and keep it there for perhaps 30 miles. The energy in gas comes from chemical bonds. The bonds in gas are not totally different from the bonds in a hamburger.



                Burning a gallon of gas produces 132,000 BTU, or $1.39 times 10^8$ J. That is ~150 times more than the 900,000 J from burning a hamburger. Given the relative sizes, it sounds like gas has more energy per pound. So a hamburger has enough energy to run a car for about 0.2 miles.



                Eating a hamburger for lunch produces enough energy to run a human until dinner. Over the course of an afternoon, a human could do enough work to push the car up to speed. Perhaps he could pedal a bicycle connected to a generator, and store the energy in batteries. Then the batteries might well have enough charge to get an electric car up to speed.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$














                • $begingroup$
                  Interesting. But the way the hamburger is "burnt" in the human body is not the same as a gallon of gas is literrally "burnt" in a motor But my understanding is that there are some bounds more or less stable: gas bounds are less stable than hamburger bounds so more energy could be extracted from. So is there any reason that could be added to say that the energy at the end would not be the same?
                  $endgroup$
                  – totalMongot
                  6 hours ago







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  It actually isn't that different. In both cases, fuel is combined with oxygen to produce CO2 and H2O. It just happens slower in a human. It produces heat, which keeps our body temperature at 98.6. But not the flame you get from running the reactions faster, or the explosion from faster still.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mmesser314
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy he got from the processing and use them at a time to push to 30 m/s the car?
                  $endgroup$
                  – totalMongot
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  Sure. He could use a bicycle connected to a generator as mentioned in the answer.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mmesser314
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy Not strictly all of it because some is needed for vital functions. But energy is energy is energy....
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gert
                  6 hours ago













                1














                1










                1







                $begingroup$

                It isn't so far fetched as it might appear. A gallon of gas will accelerate the car to speed and keep it there for perhaps 30 miles. The energy in gas comes from chemical bonds. The bonds in gas are not totally different from the bonds in a hamburger.



                Burning a gallon of gas produces 132,000 BTU, or $1.39 times 10^8$ J. That is ~150 times more than the 900,000 J from burning a hamburger. Given the relative sizes, it sounds like gas has more energy per pound. So a hamburger has enough energy to run a car for about 0.2 miles.



                Eating a hamburger for lunch produces enough energy to run a human until dinner. Over the course of an afternoon, a human could do enough work to push the car up to speed. Perhaps he could pedal a bicycle connected to a generator, and store the energy in batteries. Then the batteries might well have enough charge to get an electric car up to speed.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                It isn't so far fetched as it might appear. A gallon of gas will accelerate the car to speed and keep it there for perhaps 30 miles. The energy in gas comes from chemical bonds. The bonds in gas are not totally different from the bonds in a hamburger.



                Burning a gallon of gas produces 132,000 BTU, or $1.39 times 10^8$ J. That is ~150 times more than the 900,000 J from burning a hamburger. Given the relative sizes, it sounds like gas has more energy per pound. So a hamburger has enough energy to run a car for about 0.2 miles.



                Eating a hamburger for lunch produces enough energy to run a human until dinner. Over the course of an afternoon, a human could do enough work to push the car up to speed. Perhaps he could pedal a bicycle connected to a generator, and store the energy in batteries. Then the batteries might well have enough charge to get an electric car up to speed.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 6 hours ago

























                answered 7 hours ago









                mmesser314mmesser314

                9,8282 gold badges19 silver badges34 bronze badges




                9,8282 gold badges19 silver badges34 bronze badges














                • $begingroup$
                  Interesting. But the way the hamburger is "burnt" in the human body is not the same as a gallon of gas is literrally "burnt" in a motor But my understanding is that there are some bounds more or less stable: gas bounds are less stable than hamburger bounds so more energy could be extracted from. So is there any reason that could be added to say that the energy at the end would not be the same?
                  $endgroup$
                  – totalMongot
                  6 hours ago







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  It actually isn't that different. In both cases, fuel is combined with oxygen to produce CO2 and H2O. It just happens slower in a human. It produces heat, which keeps our body temperature at 98.6. But not the flame you get from running the reactions faster, or the explosion from faster still.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mmesser314
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy he got from the processing and use them at a time to push to 30 m/s the car?
                  $endgroup$
                  – totalMongot
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  Sure. He could use a bicycle connected to a generator as mentioned in the answer.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mmesser314
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy Not strictly all of it because some is needed for vital functions. But energy is energy is energy....
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gert
                  6 hours ago
















                • $begingroup$
                  Interesting. But the way the hamburger is "burnt" in the human body is not the same as a gallon of gas is literrally "burnt" in a motor But my understanding is that there are some bounds more or less stable: gas bounds are less stable than hamburger bounds so more energy could be extracted from. So is there any reason that could be added to say that the energy at the end would not be the same?
                  $endgroup$
                  – totalMongot
                  6 hours ago







                • 1




                  $begingroup$
                  It actually isn't that different. In both cases, fuel is combined with oxygen to produce CO2 and H2O. It just happens slower in a human. It produces heat, which keeps our body temperature at 98.6. But not the flame you get from running the reactions faster, or the explosion from faster still.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mmesser314
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy he got from the processing and use them at a time to push to 30 m/s the car?
                  $endgroup$
                  – totalMongot
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  Sure. He could use a bicycle connected to a generator as mentioned in the answer.
                  $endgroup$
                  – mmesser314
                  6 hours ago










                • $begingroup$
                  But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy Not strictly all of it because some is needed for vital functions. But energy is energy is energy....
                  $endgroup$
                  – Gert
                  6 hours ago















                $begingroup$
                Interesting. But the way the hamburger is "burnt" in the human body is not the same as a gallon of gas is literrally "burnt" in a motor But my understanding is that there are some bounds more or less stable: gas bounds are less stable than hamburger bounds so more energy could be extracted from. So is there any reason that could be added to say that the energy at the end would not be the same?
                $endgroup$
                – totalMongot
                6 hours ago





                $begingroup$
                Interesting. But the way the hamburger is "burnt" in the human body is not the same as a gallon of gas is literrally "burnt" in a motor But my understanding is that there are some bounds more or less stable: gas bounds are less stable than hamburger bounds so more energy could be extracted from. So is there any reason that could be added to say that the energy at the end would not be the same?
                $endgroup$
                – totalMongot
                6 hours ago





                1




                1




                $begingroup$
                It actually isn't that different. In both cases, fuel is combined with oxygen to produce CO2 and H2O. It just happens slower in a human. It produces heat, which keeps our body temperature at 98.6. But not the flame you get from running the reactions faster, or the explosion from faster still.
                $endgroup$
                – mmesser314
                6 hours ago




                $begingroup$
                It actually isn't that different. In both cases, fuel is combined with oxygen to produce CO2 and H2O. It just happens slower in a human. It produces heat, which keeps our body temperature at 98.6. But not the flame you get from running the reactions faster, or the explosion from faster still.
                $endgroup$
                – mmesser314
                6 hours ago












                $begingroup$
                But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy he got from the processing and use them at a time to push to 30 m/s the car?
                $endgroup$
                – totalMongot
                6 hours ago




                $begingroup$
                But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy he got from the processing and use them at a time to push to 30 m/s the car?
                $endgroup$
                – totalMongot
                6 hours ago












                $begingroup$
                Sure. He could use a bicycle connected to a generator as mentioned in the answer.
                $endgroup$
                – mmesser314
                6 hours ago




                $begingroup$
                Sure. He could use a bicycle connected to a generator as mentioned in the answer.
                $endgroup$
                – mmesser314
                6 hours ago












                $begingroup$
                But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy Not strictly all of it because some is needed for vital functions. But energy is energy is energy....
                $endgroup$
                – Gert
                6 hours ago




                $begingroup$
                But is a human able to concentrate all the heat/energy Not strictly all of it because some is needed for vital functions. But energy is energy is energy....
                $endgroup$
                – Gert
                6 hours ago











                0













                $begingroup$

                The whole scenario seems to be implausible when you consider that in order for the person to accelerate the vehicle to a speed of 30 m/s at the end the person would have to run at a pace of 70 mph!



                As to the food calories burned:



                According to one site an average person's straight pushing force is 60-80 N. Assuming 80 N and a 1000 kg car (2200 lb), which is a fairly light compared to the average, and negligible friction between the car and road, the car's acceleration would be 0.08$fracms^2$. That means it would take 6.26 minutes to reach 30 m/s and do 450 kJ of mechanical work.



                Another site mentioned that human energy efficiency in converting food energy into mechanical output is about 25%. So the required food energy would be 450/.25, or 1800 kJ.



                Hope this helps.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



















                  0













                  $begingroup$

                  The whole scenario seems to be implausible when you consider that in order for the person to accelerate the vehicle to a speed of 30 m/s at the end the person would have to run at a pace of 70 mph!



                  As to the food calories burned:



                  According to one site an average person's straight pushing force is 60-80 N. Assuming 80 N and a 1000 kg car (2200 lb), which is a fairly light compared to the average, and negligible friction between the car and road, the car's acceleration would be 0.08$fracms^2$. That means it would take 6.26 minutes to reach 30 m/s and do 450 kJ of mechanical work.



                  Another site mentioned that human energy efficiency in converting food energy into mechanical output is about 25%. So the required food energy would be 450/.25, or 1800 kJ.



                  Hope this helps.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$

















                    0














                    0










                    0







                    $begingroup$

                    The whole scenario seems to be implausible when you consider that in order for the person to accelerate the vehicle to a speed of 30 m/s at the end the person would have to run at a pace of 70 mph!



                    As to the food calories burned:



                    According to one site an average person's straight pushing force is 60-80 N. Assuming 80 N and a 1000 kg car (2200 lb), which is a fairly light compared to the average, and negligible friction between the car and road, the car's acceleration would be 0.08$fracms^2$. That means it would take 6.26 minutes to reach 30 m/s and do 450 kJ of mechanical work.



                    Another site mentioned that human energy efficiency in converting food energy into mechanical output is about 25%. So the required food energy would be 450/.25, or 1800 kJ.



                    Hope this helps.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The whole scenario seems to be implausible when you consider that in order for the person to accelerate the vehicle to a speed of 30 m/s at the end the person would have to run at a pace of 70 mph!



                    As to the food calories burned:



                    According to one site an average person's straight pushing force is 60-80 N. Assuming 80 N and a 1000 kg car (2200 lb), which is a fairly light compared to the average, and negligible friction between the car and road, the car's acceleration would be 0.08$fracms^2$. That means it would take 6.26 minutes to reach 30 m/s and do 450 kJ of mechanical work.



                    Another site mentioned that human energy efficiency in converting food energy into mechanical output is about 25%. So the required food energy would be 450/.25, or 1800 kJ.



                    Hope this helps.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 5 hours ago









                    Bob DBob D

                    12k3 gold badges10 silver badges36 bronze badges




                    12k3 gold badges10 silver badges36 bronze badges
























                        0













                        $begingroup$

                        A calorimeter is a device that you can use to measure energy of food, You put a small amount of the food in a calorimeter. Then you submerge the calorimeter in a known quantity of water. Now you vaporize the food and measure the increase in temperature of the water. By careful measurements one can determine the energy required to heat the water. That amount of heat is the caloric content of that food.



                        Once you know the energy of the food you can compare it to other material objects just by calculating the energy of the objects. Kinetic energy is just $$(1/2) mv^2$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$



















                          0













                          $begingroup$

                          A calorimeter is a device that you can use to measure energy of food, You put a small amount of the food in a calorimeter. Then you submerge the calorimeter in a known quantity of water. Now you vaporize the food and measure the increase in temperature of the water. By careful measurements one can determine the energy required to heat the water. That amount of heat is the caloric content of that food.



                          Once you know the energy of the food you can compare it to other material objects just by calculating the energy of the objects. Kinetic energy is just $$(1/2) mv^2$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            0














                            0










                            0







                            $begingroup$

                            A calorimeter is a device that you can use to measure energy of food, You put a small amount of the food in a calorimeter. Then you submerge the calorimeter in a known quantity of water. Now you vaporize the food and measure the increase in temperature of the water. By careful measurements one can determine the energy required to heat the water. That amount of heat is the caloric content of that food.



                            Once you know the energy of the food you can compare it to other material objects just by calculating the energy of the objects. Kinetic energy is just $$(1/2) mv^2$$






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            A calorimeter is a device that you can use to measure energy of food, You put a small amount of the food in a calorimeter. Then you submerge the calorimeter in a known quantity of water. Now you vaporize the food and measure the increase in temperature of the water. By careful measurements one can determine the energy required to heat the water. That amount of heat is the caloric content of that food.



                            Once you know the energy of the food you can compare it to other material objects just by calculating the energy of the objects. Kinetic energy is just $$(1/2) mv^2$$







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 3 hours ago









                            jmhjmh

                            1,4091 gold badge5 silver badges11 bronze badges




                            1,4091 gold badge5 silver badges11 bronze badges























                                totalMongot is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                totalMongot is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                totalMongot is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                totalMongot is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f498379%2fhow-do-we-calculate-energy-of-food%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                                Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                                19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу