Could a Scotland-NI bridge break Brexit impasse?Why is having border controls in Ireland so problematic for Irish nationalists?Is there a clear statement from the DUP on their position on the post-Brexit border with Ireland?What treaties or (written) agreements would a hard border in Ireland breach, post-Brexit?A vote on the Brexit backstopAmong all parties in Parliament, is there sufficient support for a hard border in the Irish Sea?Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?Will the DUP agree to a Northern Ireland Referendum?How important is the DUP support (at the moment) to the current ruling party in UK?
Job offer without any details but asking me to withdraw other applications - is it normal?
Why did it become so much more expensive to start a university?
Why do sellers care about down payments?
The Planck constant for mathematicians
Has SHA256 been broken by Treadwell Stanton DuPont?
Is low emotional intelligence associated with right-wing and prejudiced attitudes?
Does my opponent need to prove his creature has morph?
Why is Kirchoff's loop rule true in a DC circuit?
How to help my 2.5-year-old daughter take her medicine when she refuses to?
Relocation error, error code (127) after last updates
Telling my mother that I have anorexia without panicking her
Resume: How to quantify my contributions as a software engineer?
How can I locate a missing person abroad?
Can the UK veto its own extension request?
What exactly is a marshrutka (маршрутка)?
What is a realistic time needed to get a properly trained army?
A medieval fantasy adventurer lights a torch in a 100% pure oxygen room. What happens?
Will replacing a fake visa with a different fake visa cause me problems when applying for a legal study permit?
Why would "an mule" be used instead of "a mule"?
Is there a reliable way to hide/convey a message in vocal expressions (speech, song,...)
Can I conceal an antihero's insanity - and should I?
My research paper filed as a patent in China by my Chinese supervisor without me as inventor
Glue or not to glue boots
Is there any way to land a rover on the Moon without using any thrusters?
Could a Scotland-NI bridge break Brexit impasse?
Why is having border controls in Ireland so problematic for Irish nationalists?Is there a clear statement from the DUP on their position on the post-Brexit border with Ireland?What treaties or (written) agreements would a hard border in Ireland breach, post-Brexit?A vote on the Brexit backstopAmong all parties in Parliament, is there sufficient support for a hard border in the Irish Sea?Why don't hard Brexiteers insist on a hard border to prevent illegal immigration after Brexit?Will the DUP agree to a Northern Ireland Referendum?How important is the DUP support (at the moment) to the current ruling party in UK?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
According to Channel 4:
The DUP, the party supporting the Conservatives in Parliament, believes a bridge [between Scotland and Northern Ireland] could break the Brexit impasse by removing the need for a border in the Irish Sea.
Is there an explanation of how building such a bridge would remove any need for a border in the Irish sea?
united-kingdom brexit borders northern-ireland
|
show 3 more comments
According to Channel 4:
The DUP, the party supporting the Conservatives in Parliament, believes a bridge [between Scotland and Northern Ireland] could break the Brexit impasse by removing the need for a border in the Irish Sea.
Is there an explanation of how building such a bridge would remove any need for a border in the Irish sea?
united-kingdom brexit borders northern-ireland
5
No, of course it doesn't. It's also an idea that's been repeatedly rejected as infeasible.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
1
You could then have a border between Scotland and England instead.
– chirlu
9 hours ago
@chrlu so the plan would be for England to pay for a bridge between NI and an independent Scotland? That seems ... illogical.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
@pjc50, if one assumes that the Republic of Ireland stays in the EU27 common market, that there is no hard border in Ireland, and that England is out of the EU27 common market, the answers are unpalatable for an United Kingdom.
– o.m.
8 hours ago
1
If it's not named after Fionn mac Cumhaill, I don't want to hear about it.
– Rupert Morrish
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
According to Channel 4:
The DUP, the party supporting the Conservatives in Parliament, believes a bridge [between Scotland and Northern Ireland] could break the Brexit impasse by removing the need for a border in the Irish Sea.
Is there an explanation of how building such a bridge would remove any need for a border in the Irish sea?
united-kingdom brexit borders northern-ireland
According to Channel 4:
The DUP, the party supporting the Conservatives in Parliament, believes a bridge [between Scotland and Northern Ireland] could break the Brexit impasse by removing the need for a border in the Irish Sea.
Is there an explanation of how building such a bridge would remove any need for a border in the Irish sea?
united-kingdom brexit borders northern-ireland
united-kingdom brexit borders northern-ireland
edited 34 mins ago
smci
1296 bronze badges
1296 bronze badges
asked 10 hours ago
RedGrittyBrickRedGrittyBrick
5,6642 gold badges18 silver badges34 bronze badges
5,6642 gold badges18 silver badges34 bronze badges
5
No, of course it doesn't. It's also an idea that's been repeatedly rejected as infeasible.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
1
You could then have a border between Scotland and England instead.
– chirlu
9 hours ago
@chrlu so the plan would be for England to pay for a bridge between NI and an independent Scotland? That seems ... illogical.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
@pjc50, if one assumes that the Republic of Ireland stays in the EU27 common market, that there is no hard border in Ireland, and that England is out of the EU27 common market, the answers are unpalatable for an United Kingdom.
– o.m.
8 hours ago
1
If it's not named after Fionn mac Cumhaill, I don't want to hear about it.
– Rupert Morrish
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
5
No, of course it doesn't. It's also an idea that's been repeatedly rejected as infeasible.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
1
You could then have a border between Scotland and England instead.
– chirlu
9 hours ago
@chrlu so the plan would be for England to pay for a bridge between NI and an independent Scotland? That seems ... illogical.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
@pjc50, if one assumes that the Republic of Ireland stays in the EU27 common market, that there is no hard border in Ireland, and that England is out of the EU27 common market, the answers are unpalatable for an United Kingdom.
– o.m.
8 hours ago
1
If it's not named after Fionn mac Cumhaill, I don't want to hear about it.
– Rupert Morrish
6 hours ago
5
5
No, of course it doesn't. It's also an idea that's been repeatedly rejected as infeasible.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
No, of course it doesn't. It's also an idea that's been repeatedly rejected as infeasible.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
1
1
You could then have a border between Scotland and England instead.
– chirlu
9 hours ago
You could then have a border between Scotland and England instead.
– chirlu
9 hours ago
@chrlu so the plan would be for England to pay for a bridge between NI and an independent Scotland? That seems ... illogical.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
@chrlu so the plan would be for England to pay for a bridge between NI and an independent Scotland? That seems ... illogical.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
@pjc50, if one assumes that the Republic of Ireland stays in the EU27 common market, that there is no hard border in Ireland, and that England is out of the EU27 common market, the answers are unpalatable for an United Kingdom.
– o.m.
8 hours ago
@pjc50, if one assumes that the Republic of Ireland stays in the EU27 common market, that there is no hard border in Ireland, and that England is out of the EU27 common market, the answers are unpalatable for an United Kingdom.
– o.m.
8 hours ago
1
1
If it's not named after Fionn mac Cumhaill, I don't want to hear about it.
– Rupert Morrish
6 hours ago
If it's not named after Fionn mac Cumhaill, I don't want to hear about it.
– Rupert Morrish
6 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The "border in the Irish Sea" refers to a regulatory border, namely a customs border, that would require customs inspections of vehicles traveling between Northern Ireland and rest of the United Kingdom. More specifically, it refers to a plan to have Northern Ireland be a separate customs territory from the rest of the UK so it can remain in the EU customs union, thereby being in customs union with the Republic of Ireland. This would prevent the introduction of customs controls on the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
Creating a new mode of transportation between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK, including a bridge allowing people to drive vehicles from one place to another without putting them on a ferry, would change none of that. Bridges cross customs borders all over the world. When they do, there are customs posts at one end or both. If Northern Ireland becomes a separate customs territory from the rest of the UK, there will need to be customs controls on ships and aircraft traveling between them, as well as on any bridge that might be built.
2
The main change would be that instead of having a border in the Irish Sea, you would have a border on the Irish Bridge.
– Evargalo
6 hours ago
6
@Evargalo well, not "instead of," but "in addition to": I doubt the bridge would replace all ferry traffic; it probably wouldn't replace much other sea cargo traffic. Air traffic would probably see little change as well.
– phoog
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
I'm not sure the DUP has actually said something like that. Channel4 may have misinterpreted the following not-so-recent statement of Paul Girvan, MP for South Antrim and DUP transport spokesperson:
As we leave the European Union, the DUP has been clear that there should be no border erected down the Irish Sea. Instead of placing barriers between parts of the United Kingdom we should be building bridges.
According to the same source, the DUP did have a feasibility study for the bridge across the North Channel in its 2015 general election manifesto. (Which Boris Johnson is now fulfilling, in that respect.)
I read that as the DUP doesn't want an Irish Sea border and they want a bridge (to Scotland), i.e. the bridge is the cherry on the cake, not a mitigating/consolation thingy.
Likewise, Arlene Foster was quoted by the BBC saying
"Whilst some foolishly attempt to use Brexit to build a border between Scotland and Northern Ireland, we are more progressive, we want to build a bridge", she said.
Now, it is possible that Boris Johnson may have obtained some concessions from the DUP in return for his support for the feasibility study for the bridge... but I haven't been able to find any confirmation or details on that. Conceivably, such concessions could be related to Brexit terms, but they could also relate to reopening Stormont, which Johnson is trying to do in order to avoid direct rule in case of a no-deal Brexit.
add a comment
|
No it couldn't (and that's neglecting the fact that any hypothetical bridge couldn't even be built in time, in unprecedented 1000ft deep water
and somehow clearing the 1.5 million tons of WWII munitions that were dumped in the Beaufort Dyke. But those aren't even the relevant issue, they don't magically solve the issues or nullify the UK's 1998 Belfast Agreement treaty obligations to Ireland, which is what this piece of theatre is dancing around).
This is just a pre-election soundbite, not a rational engineering proposal. For a rebuttal of the technical requirements and £20++ bn estimate, see https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2018/10/08/news/bridge-to-scotland-about-as-feasible-as-building-a-bridge-to-the-moon--1453026/
- You have to stop seeing Boris Johnson as a politician, and start seeing him as an unprincipled conman in a tight spot, whose career is living on borrowed time, temporarily pandering to his junior coalition partner (DUP). He only needs people to believe this until an October 2019 election. Other billion-pound promises he made recently include NHS funding and other borrowing.
- The DUP (and their Eurosceptic allies in the Tory party) want to create "facts on the ground" (to borrow the American phrase used about Iraq) to allow England to undermine and eventually violate the Belfast Agreement in the near future by reimposing border controls (both customs and immigration) with the Republic of Ireland. But a bridge cannot undo that treaty.
- The current Cons-DUP coalition has been throwing billions at the DUP since they briefly gained the balance-of-power in former PM Theresa May's disastrous 2017 election which wiped out her majority. Expect this to end the day the DUP stops holding the balance of power in Westminster, presumably Nov 2019.
- Asking the electorate to close their eyes and wish the Agreement away would be about as successful (and infinitely cheaper).
New contributor
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "475"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45475%2fcould-a-scotland-ni-bridge-break-brexit-impasse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The "border in the Irish Sea" refers to a regulatory border, namely a customs border, that would require customs inspections of vehicles traveling between Northern Ireland and rest of the United Kingdom. More specifically, it refers to a plan to have Northern Ireland be a separate customs territory from the rest of the UK so it can remain in the EU customs union, thereby being in customs union with the Republic of Ireland. This would prevent the introduction of customs controls on the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
Creating a new mode of transportation between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK, including a bridge allowing people to drive vehicles from one place to another without putting them on a ferry, would change none of that. Bridges cross customs borders all over the world. When they do, there are customs posts at one end or both. If Northern Ireland becomes a separate customs territory from the rest of the UK, there will need to be customs controls on ships and aircraft traveling between them, as well as on any bridge that might be built.
2
The main change would be that instead of having a border in the Irish Sea, you would have a border on the Irish Bridge.
– Evargalo
6 hours ago
6
@Evargalo well, not "instead of," but "in addition to": I doubt the bridge would replace all ferry traffic; it probably wouldn't replace much other sea cargo traffic. Air traffic would probably see little change as well.
– phoog
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
The "border in the Irish Sea" refers to a regulatory border, namely a customs border, that would require customs inspections of vehicles traveling between Northern Ireland and rest of the United Kingdom. More specifically, it refers to a plan to have Northern Ireland be a separate customs territory from the rest of the UK so it can remain in the EU customs union, thereby being in customs union with the Republic of Ireland. This would prevent the introduction of customs controls on the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
Creating a new mode of transportation between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK, including a bridge allowing people to drive vehicles from one place to another without putting them on a ferry, would change none of that. Bridges cross customs borders all over the world. When they do, there are customs posts at one end or both. If Northern Ireland becomes a separate customs territory from the rest of the UK, there will need to be customs controls on ships and aircraft traveling between them, as well as on any bridge that might be built.
2
The main change would be that instead of having a border in the Irish Sea, you would have a border on the Irish Bridge.
– Evargalo
6 hours ago
6
@Evargalo well, not "instead of," but "in addition to": I doubt the bridge would replace all ferry traffic; it probably wouldn't replace much other sea cargo traffic. Air traffic would probably see little change as well.
– phoog
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
The "border in the Irish Sea" refers to a regulatory border, namely a customs border, that would require customs inspections of vehicles traveling between Northern Ireland and rest of the United Kingdom. More specifically, it refers to a plan to have Northern Ireland be a separate customs territory from the rest of the UK so it can remain in the EU customs union, thereby being in customs union with the Republic of Ireland. This would prevent the introduction of customs controls on the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
Creating a new mode of transportation between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK, including a bridge allowing people to drive vehicles from one place to another without putting them on a ferry, would change none of that. Bridges cross customs borders all over the world. When they do, there are customs posts at one end or both. If Northern Ireland becomes a separate customs territory from the rest of the UK, there will need to be customs controls on ships and aircraft traveling between them, as well as on any bridge that might be built.
The "border in the Irish Sea" refers to a regulatory border, namely a customs border, that would require customs inspections of vehicles traveling between Northern Ireland and rest of the United Kingdom. More specifically, it refers to a plan to have Northern Ireland be a separate customs territory from the rest of the UK so it can remain in the EU customs union, thereby being in customs union with the Republic of Ireland. This would prevent the introduction of customs controls on the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
Creating a new mode of transportation between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK, including a bridge allowing people to drive vehicles from one place to another without putting them on a ferry, would change none of that. Bridges cross customs borders all over the world. When they do, there are customs posts at one end or both. If Northern Ireland becomes a separate customs territory from the rest of the UK, there will need to be customs controls on ships and aircraft traveling between them, as well as on any bridge that might be built.
edited 7 hours ago
answered 7 hours ago
phoogphoog
4,9721 gold badge16 silver badges32 bronze badges
4,9721 gold badge16 silver badges32 bronze badges
2
The main change would be that instead of having a border in the Irish Sea, you would have a border on the Irish Bridge.
– Evargalo
6 hours ago
6
@Evargalo well, not "instead of," but "in addition to": I doubt the bridge would replace all ferry traffic; it probably wouldn't replace much other sea cargo traffic. Air traffic would probably see little change as well.
– phoog
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
2
The main change would be that instead of having a border in the Irish Sea, you would have a border on the Irish Bridge.
– Evargalo
6 hours ago
6
@Evargalo well, not "instead of," but "in addition to": I doubt the bridge would replace all ferry traffic; it probably wouldn't replace much other sea cargo traffic. Air traffic would probably see little change as well.
– phoog
5 hours ago
2
2
The main change would be that instead of having a border in the Irish Sea, you would have a border on the Irish Bridge.
– Evargalo
6 hours ago
The main change would be that instead of having a border in the Irish Sea, you would have a border on the Irish Bridge.
– Evargalo
6 hours ago
6
6
@Evargalo well, not "instead of," but "in addition to": I doubt the bridge would replace all ferry traffic; it probably wouldn't replace much other sea cargo traffic. Air traffic would probably see little change as well.
– phoog
5 hours ago
@Evargalo well, not "instead of," but "in addition to": I doubt the bridge would replace all ferry traffic; it probably wouldn't replace much other sea cargo traffic. Air traffic would probably see little change as well.
– phoog
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
I'm not sure the DUP has actually said something like that. Channel4 may have misinterpreted the following not-so-recent statement of Paul Girvan, MP for South Antrim and DUP transport spokesperson:
As we leave the European Union, the DUP has been clear that there should be no border erected down the Irish Sea. Instead of placing barriers between parts of the United Kingdom we should be building bridges.
According to the same source, the DUP did have a feasibility study for the bridge across the North Channel in its 2015 general election manifesto. (Which Boris Johnson is now fulfilling, in that respect.)
I read that as the DUP doesn't want an Irish Sea border and they want a bridge (to Scotland), i.e. the bridge is the cherry on the cake, not a mitigating/consolation thingy.
Likewise, Arlene Foster was quoted by the BBC saying
"Whilst some foolishly attempt to use Brexit to build a border between Scotland and Northern Ireland, we are more progressive, we want to build a bridge", she said.
Now, it is possible that Boris Johnson may have obtained some concessions from the DUP in return for his support for the feasibility study for the bridge... but I haven't been able to find any confirmation or details on that. Conceivably, such concessions could be related to Brexit terms, but they could also relate to reopening Stormont, which Johnson is trying to do in order to avoid direct rule in case of a no-deal Brexit.
add a comment
|
I'm not sure the DUP has actually said something like that. Channel4 may have misinterpreted the following not-so-recent statement of Paul Girvan, MP for South Antrim and DUP transport spokesperson:
As we leave the European Union, the DUP has been clear that there should be no border erected down the Irish Sea. Instead of placing barriers between parts of the United Kingdom we should be building bridges.
According to the same source, the DUP did have a feasibility study for the bridge across the North Channel in its 2015 general election manifesto. (Which Boris Johnson is now fulfilling, in that respect.)
I read that as the DUP doesn't want an Irish Sea border and they want a bridge (to Scotland), i.e. the bridge is the cherry on the cake, not a mitigating/consolation thingy.
Likewise, Arlene Foster was quoted by the BBC saying
"Whilst some foolishly attempt to use Brexit to build a border between Scotland and Northern Ireland, we are more progressive, we want to build a bridge", she said.
Now, it is possible that Boris Johnson may have obtained some concessions from the DUP in return for his support for the feasibility study for the bridge... but I haven't been able to find any confirmation or details on that. Conceivably, such concessions could be related to Brexit terms, but they could also relate to reopening Stormont, which Johnson is trying to do in order to avoid direct rule in case of a no-deal Brexit.
add a comment
|
I'm not sure the DUP has actually said something like that. Channel4 may have misinterpreted the following not-so-recent statement of Paul Girvan, MP for South Antrim and DUP transport spokesperson:
As we leave the European Union, the DUP has been clear that there should be no border erected down the Irish Sea. Instead of placing barriers between parts of the United Kingdom we should be building bridges.
According to the same source, the DUP did have a feasibility study for the bridge across the North Channel in its 2015 general election manifesto. (Which Boris Johnson is now fulfilling, in that respect.)
I read that as the DUP doesn't want an Irish Sea border and they want a bridge (to Scotland), i.e. the bridge is the cherry on the cake, not a mitigating/consolation thingy.
Likewise, Arlene Foster was quoted by the BBC saying
"Whilst some foolishly attempt to use Brexit to build a border between Scotland and Northern Ireland, we are more progressive, we want to build a bridge", she said.
Now, it is possible that Boris Johnson may have obtained some concessions from the DUP in return for his support for the feasibility study for the bridge... but I haven't been able to find any confirmation or details on that. Conceivably, such concessions could be related to Brexit terms, but they could also relate to reopening Stormont, which Johnson is trying to do in order to avoid direct rule in case of a no-deal Brexit.
I'm not sure the DUP has actually said something like that. Channel4 may have misinterpreted the following not-so-recent statement of Paul Girvan, MP for South Antrim and DUP transport spokesperson:
As we leave the European Union, the DUP has been clear that there should be no border erected down the Irish Sea. Instead of placing barriers between parts of the United Kingdom we should be building bridges.
According to the same source, the DUP did have a feasibility study for the bridge across the North Channel in its 2015 general election manifesto. (Which Boris Johnson is now fulfilling, in that respect.)
I read that as the DUP doesn't want an Irish Sea border and they want a bridge (to Scotland), i.e. the bridge is the cherry on the cake, not a mitigating/consolation thingy.
Likewise, Arlene Foster was quoted by the BBC saying
"Whilst some foolishly attempt to use Brexit to build a border between Scotland and Northern Ireland, we are more progressive, we want to build a bridge", she said.
Now, it is possible that Boris Johnson may have obtained some concessions from the DUP in return for his support for the feasibility study for the bridge... but I haven't been able to find any confirmation or details on that. Conceivably, such concessions could be related to Brexit terms, but they could also relate to reopening Stormont, which Johnson is trying to do in order to avoid direct rule in case of a no-deal Brexit.
edited 2 hours ago
answered 4 hours ago
FizzFizz
23.6k3 gold badges60 silver badges136 bronze badges
23.6k3 gold badges60 silver badges136 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
No it couldn't (and that's neglecting the fact that any hypothetical bridge couldn't even be built in time, in unprecedented 1000ft deep water
and somehow clearing the 1.5 million tons of WWII munitions that were dumped in the Beaufort Dyke. But those aren't even the relevant issue, they don't magically solve the issues or nullify the UK's 1998 Belfast Agreement treaty obligations to Ireland, which is what this piece of theatre is dancing around).
This is just a pre-election soundbite, not a rational engineering proposal. For a rebuttal of the technical requirements and £20++ bn estimate, see https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2018/10/08/news/bridge-to-scotland-about-as-feasible-as-building-a-bridge-to-the-moon--1453026/
- You have to stop seeing Boris Johnson as a politician, and start seeing him as an unprincipled conman in a tight spot, whose career is living on borrowed time, temporarily pandering to his junior coalition partner (DUP). He only needs people to believe this until an October 2019 election. Other billion-pound promises he made recently include NHS funding and other borrowing.
- The DUP (and their Eurosceptic allies in the Tory party) want to create "facts on the ground" (to borrow the American phrase used about Iraq) to allow England to undermine and eventually violate the Belfast Agreement in the near future by reimposing border controls (both customs and immigration) with the Republic of Ireland. But a bridge cannot undo that treaty.
- The current Cons-DUP coalition has been throwing billions at the DUP since they briefly gained the balance-of-power in former PM Theresa May's disastrous 2017 election which wiped out her majority. Expect this to end the day the DUP stops holding the balance of power in Westminster, presumably Nov 2019.
- Asking the electorate to close their eyes and wish the Agreement away would be about as successful (and infinitely cheaper).
New contributor
add a comment
|
No it couldn't (and that's neglecting the fact that any hypothetical bridge couldn't even be built in time, in unprecedented 1000ft deep water
and somehow clearing the 1.5 million tons of WWII munitions that were dumped in the Beaufort Dyke. But those aren't even the relevant issue, they don't magically solve the issues or nullify the UK's 1998 Belfast Agreement treaty obligations to Ireland, which is what this piece of theatre is dancing around).
This is just a pre-election soundbite, not a rational engineering proposal. For a rebuttal of the technical requirements and £20++ bn estimate, see https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2018/10/08/news/bridge-to-scotland-about-as-feasible-as-building-a-bridge-to-the-moon--1453026/
- You have to stop seeing Boris Johnson as a politician, and start seeing him as an unprincipled conman in a tight spot, whose career is living on borrowed time, temporarily pandering to his junior coalition partner (DUP). He only needs people to believe this until an October 2019 election. Other billion-pound promises he made recently include NHS funding and other borrowing.
- The DUP (and their Eurosceptic allies in the Tory party) want to create "facts on the ground" (to borrow the American phrase used about Iraq) to allow England to undermine and eventually violate the Belfast Agreement in the near future by reimposing border controls (both customs and immigration) with the Republic of Ireland. But a bridge cannot undo that treaty.
- The current Cons-DUP coalition has been throwing billions at the DUP since they briefly gained the balance-of-power in former PM Theresa May's disastrous 2017 election which wiped out her majority. Expect this to end the day the DUP stops holding the balance of power in Westminster, presumably Nov 2019.
- Asking the electorate to close their eyes and wish the Agreement away would be about as successful (and infinitely cheaper).
New contributor
add a comment
|
No it couldn't (and that's neglecting the fact that any hypothetical bridge couldn't even be built in time, in unprecedented 1000ft deep water
and somehow clearing the 1.5 million tons of WWII munitions that were dumped in the Beaufort Dyke. But those aren't even the relevant issue, they don't magically solve the issues or nullify the UK's 1998 Belfast Agreement treaty obligations to Ireland, which is what this piece of theatre is dancing around).
This is just a pre-election soundbite, not a rational engineering proposal. For a rebuttal of the technical requirements and £20++ bn estimate, see https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2018/10/08/news/bridge-to-scotland-about-as-feasible-as-building-a-bridge-to-the-moon--1453026/
- You have to stop seeing Boris Johnson as a politician, and start seeing him as an unprincipled conman in a tight spot, whose career is living on borrowed time, temporarily pandering to his junior coalition partner (DUP). He only needs people to believe this until an October 2019 election. Other billion-pound promises he made recently include NHS funding and other borrowing.
- The DUP (and their Eurosceptic allies in the Tory party) want to create "facts on the ground" (to borrow the American phrase used about Iraq) to allow England to undermine and eventually violate the Belfast Agreement in the near future by reimposing border controls (both customs and immigration) with the Republic of Ireland. But a bridge cannot undo that treaty.
- The current Cons-DUP coalition has been throwing billions at the DUP since they briefly gained the balance-of-power in former PM Theresa May's disastrous 2017 election which wiped out her majority. Expect this to end the day the DUP stops holding the balance of power in Westminster, presumably Nov 2019.
- Asking the electorate to close their eyes and wish the Agreement away would be about as successful (and infinitely cheaper).
New contributor
No it couldn't (and that's neglecting the fact that any hypothetical bridge couldn't even be built in time, in unprecedented 1000ft deep water
and somehow clearing the 1.5 million tons of WWII munitions that were dumped in the Beaufort Dyke. But those aren't even the relevant issue, they don't magically solve the issues or nullify the UK's 1998 Belfast Agreement treaty obligations to Ireland, which is what this piece of theatre is dancing around).
This is just a pre-election soundbite, not a rational engineering proposal. For a rebuttal of the technical requirements and £20++ bn estimate, see https://www.irishnews.com/news/northernirelandnews/2018/10/08/news/bridge-to-scotland-about-as-feasible-as-building-a-bridge-to-the-moon--1453026/
- You have to stop seeing Boris Johnson as a politician, and start seeing him as an unprincipled conman in a tight spot, whose career is living on borrowed time, temporarily pandering to his junior coalition partner (DUP). He only needs people to believe this until an October 2019 election. Other billion-pound promises he made recently include NHS funding and other borrowing.
- The DUP (and their Eurosceptic allies in the Tory party) want to create "facts on the ground" (to borrow the American phrase used about Iraq) to allow England to undermine and eventually violate the Belfast Agreement in the near future by reimposing border controls (both customs and immigration) with the Republic of Ireland. But a bridge cannot undo that treaty.
- The current Cons-DUP coalition has been throwing billions at the DUP since they briefly gained the balance-of-power in former PM Theresa May's disastrous 2017 election which wiped out her majority. Expect this to end the day the DUP stops holding the balance of power in Westminster, presumably Nov 2019.
- Asking the electorate to close their eyes and wish the Agreement away would be about as successful (and infinitely cheaper).
New contributor
New contributor
answered 40 mins ago
smcismci
1296 bronze badges
1296 bronze badges
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f45475%2fcould-a-scotland-ni-bridge-break-brexit-impasse%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
5
No, of course it doesn't. It's also an idea that's been repeatedly rejected as infeasible.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
1
You could then have a border between Scotland and England instead.
– chirlu
9 hours ago
@chrlu so the plan would be for England to pay for a bridge between NI and an independent Scotland? That seems ... illogical.
– pjc50
9 hours ago
@pjc50, if one assumes that the Republic of Ireland stays in the EU27 common market, that there is no hard border in Ireland, and that England is out of the EU27 common market, the answers are unpalatable for an United Kingdom.
– o.m.
8 hours ago
1
If it's not named after Fionn mac Cumhaill, I don't want to hear about it.
– Rupert Morrish
6 hours ago