Fight a biblical flood apart from building barriersHow to Escape an Impossible Situation Using Minimal Magic?Colonizing a fresh Earth : where to place the first settlements?How to bring water and heat to an isolated and poor mountain village with extremely low costs?Human population vs. rising ocean levelsWater supply on an mountain fortressWould it be possible to have fresh water in a world where there was a major volcanic eruption which destroyed all civilisation apart from one city?How to prevent allies from acting in an organized manner?Plausible weapon or other cause for a space-stage civilization to shatter and revert to primitive societiesWhat would a medieval war against an aquatic race look like?
How can I discourage sharing internal API keys within a company?
Make 1998 using the least possible digits 8
Is there any way to land a rover on the Moon without using any thrusters?
Eccentric keepers
Will replacing a fake visa with a different fake visa cause me problems when applying for a legal study permit?
How are chord ratios developed exactly?
A shy person in a queue
Are Democrats more likely to believe Astrology is a science?
I asked for a graduate student position from a professor. He replied "welcome". What does that mean?
Is there an inconsistency about Natasha Romanoff's middle name in the MCU?
How are aircraft depainted?
Might have gotten a coworker sick, should I address this?
How to work with a technician hired with a grant who argues everything
What is a realistic time needed to get a properly trained army?
The Planck constant for mathematicians
Why would "an mule" be used instead of "a mule"?
"Literally" Vs "In the true sense of the word"
Can I conceal an antihero's insanity - and should I?
Linear Programming with additional "if-then"/"Default to zero" constraints?
Are scroll bars dead in 2019?
How to help my 2.5-year-old daughter take her medicine when she refuses to?
Why do sellers care about down payments?
Is a suit against a Univeristy Dorm for changing policies on a whim likely to succeed (USA)?
What officially disallows US presidents from driving?
Fight a biblical flood apart from building barriers
How to Escape an Impossible Situation Using Minimal Magic?Colonizing a fresh Earth : where to place the first settlements?How to bring water and heat to an isolated and poor mountain village with extremely low costs?Human population vs. rising ocean levelsWater supply on an mountain fortressWould it be possible to have fresh water in a world where there was a major volcanic eruption which destroyed all civilisation apart from one city?How to prevent allies from acting in an organized manner?Plausible weapon or other cause for a space-stage civilization to shatter and revert to primitive societiesWhat would a medieval war against an aquatic race look like?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
In a medieval setting, which methods of fighting a rising sea level exist apart from building barriers? The idea is that a civilization has to fight the flood just long enough to finish their ark.
The civilization has access to iron, coal, stone and wood but is not limited just to those four. Maybe some little magic is possible. The water can come from just one side but it is also be possible that a villiage is located on an island and has to fight the water from all directions. The villiage is always located on the coast and moving into higher altitudes is not possible dua to the speed of the rising sea level.
Edit:
The reason for the flood is unknown so therfore it cannot be prevented by religion or something like that. The ark is used to save the civilization and to get to a save place when the flood is over or maxed out.
medieval earth water
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
In a medieval setting, which methods of fighting a rising sea level exist apart from building barriers? The idea is that a civilization has to fight the flood just long enough to finish their ark.
The civilization has access to iron, coal, stone and wood but is not limited just to those four. Maybe some little magic is possible. The water can come from just one side but it is also be possible that a villiage is located on an island and has to fight the water from all directions. The villiage is always located on the coast and moving into higher altitudes is not possible dua to the speed of the rising sea level.
Edit:
The reason for the flood is unknown so therfore it cannot be prevented by religion or something like that. The ark is used to save the civilization and to get to a save place when the flood is over or maxed out.
medieval earth water
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This whole 'ark' thing isn't a trick to get rid of the telephone sanitizers, account executives, hairdressers, TV producers, insurance salesmen, personnel officers, security guards, public relations executives, and management consultants, right?
$endgroup$
– user535733
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have to admit that the word biblical was probably a bad choice but it was a short succinct word which saved me a lot of explanation. The reason for the flood is unknown so therfore it cannot be prevented by religion or something like that. The ark is used to save the civilization and to get to a save place when the flood is over.
$endgroup$
– Gistiv
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv It probably would have been better to say "a global flood or something that would seem global to them". But I think we get the point.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv If we are to assume that the flood was known about in advance (else why build an ark) why would they not build it on higher-ground with a launch ramp? This all seems not-well-defined and therefore opinion-based. When you say "maybe some little magic is possible", unless you tell us what you are allowing and disallowing in your world, why would "The ark and materials and town was all levitated out the way" not be a valid answer? Maybe it is. Please edit your question to provide some clarity as to what it is that you want to know.
$endgroup$
– Chickens are not cows
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
In a medieval setting, which methods of fighting a rising sea level exist apart from building barriers? The idea is that a civilization has to fight the flood just long enough to finish their ark.
The civilization has access to iron, coal, stone and wood but is not limited just to those four. Maybe some little magic is possible. The water can come from just one side but it is also be possible that a villiage is located on an island and has to fight the water from all directions. The villiage is always located on the coast and moving into higher altitudes is not possible dua to the speed of the rising sea level.
Edit:
The reason for the flood is unknown so therfore it cannot be prevented by religion or something like that. The ark is used to save the civilization and to get to a save place when the flood is over or maxed out.
medieval earth water
$endgroup$
In a medieval setting, which methods of fighting a rising sea level exist apart from building barriers? The idea is that a civilization has to fight the flood just long enough to finish their ark.
The civilization has access to iron, coal, stone and wood but is not limited just to those four. Maybe some little magic is possible. The water can come from just one side but it is also be possible that a villiage is located on an island and has to fight the water from all directions. The villiage is always located on the coast and moving into higher altitudes is not possible dua to the speed of the rising sea level.
Edit:
The reason for the flood is unknown so therfore it cannot be prevented by religion or something like that. The ark is used to save the civilization and to get to a save place when the flood is over or maxed out.
medieval earth water
medieval earth water
edited 8 hours ago
Gistiv
asked 9 hours ago
GistivGistiv
2432 silver badges9 bronze badges
2432 silver badges9 bronze badges
1
$begingroup$
This whole 'ark' thing isn't a trick to get rid of the telephone sanitizers, account executives, hairdressers, TV producers, insurance salesmen, personnel officers, security guards, public relations executives, and management consultants, right?
$endgroup$
– user535733
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have to admit that the word biblical was probably a bad choice but it was a short succinct word which saved me a lot of explanation. The reason for the flood is unknown so therfore it cannot be prevented by religion or something like that. The ark is used to save the civilization and to get to a save place when the flood is over.
$endgroup$
– Gistiv
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv It probably would have been better to say "a global flood or something that would seem global to them". But I think we get the point.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv If we are to assume that the flood was known about in advance (else why build an ark) why would they not build it on higher-ground with a launch ramp? This all seems not-well-defined and therefore opinion-based. When you say "maybe some little magic is possible", unless you tell us what you are allowing and disallowing in your world, why would "The ark and materials and town was all levitated out the way" not be a valid answer? Maybe it is. Please edit your question to provide some clarity as to what it is that you want to know.
$endgroup$
– Chickens are not cows
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
1
$begingroup$
This whole 'ark' thing isn't a trick to get rid of the telephone sanitizers, account executives, hairdressers, TV producers, insurance salesmen, personnel officers, security guards, public relations executives, and management consultants, right?
$endgroup$
– user535733
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have to admit that the word biblical was probably a bad choice but it was a short succinct word which saved me a lot of explanation. The reason for the flood is unknown so therfore it cannot be prevented by religion or something like that. The ark is used to save the civilization and to get to a save place when the flood is over.
$endgroup$
– Gistiv
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv It probably would have been better to say "a global flood or something that would seem global to them". But I think we get the point.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv If we are to assume that the flood was known about in advance (else why build an ark) why would they not build it on higher-ground with a launch ramp? This all seems not-well-defined and therefore opinion-based. When you say "maybe some little magic is possible", unless you tell us what you are allowing and disallowing in your world, why would "The ark and materials and town was all levitated out the way" not be a valid answer? Maybe it is. Please edit your question to provide some clarity as to what it is that you want to know.
$endgroup$
– Chickens are not cows
5 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
This whole 'ark' thing isn't a trick to get rid of the telephone sanitizers, account executives, hairdressers, TV producers, insurance salesmen, personnel officers, security guards, public relations executives, and management consultants, right?
$endgroup$
– user535733
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This whole 'ark' thing isn't a trick to get rid of the telephone sanitizers, account executives, hairdressers, TV producers, insurance salesmen, personnel officers, security guards, public relations executives, and management consultants, right?
$endgroup$
– user535733
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have to admit that the word biblical was probably a bad choice but it was a short succinct word which saved me a lot of explanation. The reason for the flood is unknown so therfore it cannot be prevented by religion or something like that. The ark is used to save the civilization and to get to a save place when the flood is over.
$endgroup$
– Gistiv
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have to admit that the word biblical was probably a bad choice but it was a short succinct word which saved me a lot of explanation. The reason for the flood is unknown so therfore it cannot be prevented by religion or something like that. The ark is used to save the civilization and to get to a save place when the flood is over.
$endgroup$
– Gistiv
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv It probably would have been better to say "a global flood or something that would seem global to them". But I think we get the point.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv It probably would have been better to say "a global flood or something that would seem global to them". But I think we get the point.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv If we are to assume that the flood was known about in advance (else why build an ark) why would they not build it on higher-ground with a launch ramp? This all seems not-well-defined and therefore opinion-based. When you say "maybe some little magic is possible", unless you tell us what you are allowing and disallowing in your world, why would "The ark and materials and town was all levitated out the way" not be a valid answer? Maybe it is. Please edit your question to provide some clarity as to what it is that you want to know.
$endgroup$
– Chickens are not cows
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv If we are to assume that the flood was known about in advance (else why build an ark) why would they not build it on higher-ground with a launch ramp? This all seems not-well-defined and therefore opinion-based. When you say "maybe some little magic is possible", unless you tell us what you are allowing and disallowing in your world, why would "The ark and materials and town was all levitated out the way" not be a valid answer? Maybe it is. Please edit your question to provide some clarity as to what it is that you want to know.
$endgroup$
– Chickens are not cows
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you rule out barriers (which the Dutch have been using for a very long time), the only thing you can do is go up.
You can float it (as @JRodge01 said) or jack things up on stilts. Though both of those would take much more work and time than a barrier.
By the time you build something big enough to float the arc while it's being constructed, you've built the arc.
The effort of jacking things up (town, construction site, etc) would also boarder on the ridiculous.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Bottom line - find a higher ground for the ark's construction site.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Digging holes
More specifically, channels. Give the water somewhere to run that isn’t where your ark is. Piling the earth up as extra barriers (not to resist the water but to force it into other channels) is an excellent idea.
If your ark is on a slope then digging channels so the water rushes around it and down the hill will buy you time until the water level rises. Not a permanent measure, but it helps you survive.
This tactic is used all the time in flood management in times of great rainfall. Channels are opened up and used to selectI rly flood areas where the water will cause less damage, thus giving the more important areas (your ark) longer until they are overwhelmed.
Just try not to flood anything you need before you don’t need it any more.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't see channels working any better than barriers. Against an ocean's worth of water, any channel they could build would be nothing.
$endgroup$
– ShadoCat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This could work for a small flood, but if we're assuming a flood that covers the world or as much of the world as these people can reach, I'd think any channels you dig would simply overflow.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Shadocat: the same is true of all defences bar building... well, an ark. The channels merely give you an extra few hours or days to complete the job while the water is diverted elsewhere.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Jay: depends on how quickly the flood comes in. If it’s a flood due to, say, 40 days and nights of rain: you can assume that as long as your channels can divert the initial volume of water they’ll be good until they collapse or the reservoir you’re diverting to floods up to your level. If the ark is on a slope above a floodplain you could buy yourself days in a 40 days and nights style flood.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoeBloggs Alright, fair enough. I guess the question is, How much water do you have to be able to deal with? If the answer is "1 inch", then a solution is "wear boots". If the answer is "2000 feet", it's probably hopeless. In the middle I suppose there are a number of possibilities.
$endgroup$
– Jay
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
A village on an island presumably has boats or other sort of sea-faring devices. Perhaps some sort of floating construction platform that isn't sustainable long-term, but able to be sustained long enough for construction to finish.
For the coastal village you could have walls that angle the water elsewhere as a stalling tactic until the water goes over the wall. Very old civilizations use qanats as a way to bring water from one place to another. I'd assume that this could also be used as a way to divert flood water.
Channals or trenches to divert water to the other side of a walled village, or utilizing local ravines and valleys to carry off water would also provide time.
That said, unless major foresight existed prior to the beginning of the ark's construction, I don't believe there'd be any solution that would buy more time than contributing to the are.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Cave.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/biggest-longest-five-amazing-caves-visit-180952892/
Your people move the ark into the cave. As the shipwrights work, stonemasons wall off the entrance. The stonemasons were relegated to making sandwiches and giving backrubs during the ark project, and are happy to be back to work making things out of stone.
When the ark is done they break the wall and the water rushes in. The ark is lifted up to the entrance and leaves.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Better still, a cave that starts low and travels up; it will form a natural moonpool when it floods and the upper levels of the cave will stay dry. Probably won't be big enough to build an ark though, and you'll want a snorkel from the top of the cave to the top of the floodwater.
$endgroup$
– Logan Pickup
40 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I would think that building a wall to hold back the water would be more work than finishing the ark. The wall would have to be at least as big as the ark.
You could build a floating dock for your ark, but again, that's probably more work than finishing the ark.
I presume if the society is medieval we're ruling out aircraft or traveling to the Moon.
I'm hard pressed to think of what you could do that would be faster or easier than finishing the ark.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "579"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f155930%2ffight-a-biblical-flood-apart-from-building-barriers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If you rule out barriers (which the Dutch have been using for a very long time), the only thing you can do is go up.
You can float it (as @JRodge01 said) or jack things up on stilts. Though both of those would take much more work and time than a barrier.
By the time you build something big enough to float the arc while it's being constructed, you've built the arc.
The effort of jacking things up (town, construction site, etc) would also boarder on the ridiculous.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Bottom line - find a higher ground for the ark's construction site.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
If you rule out barriers (which the Dutch have been using for a very long time), the only thing you can do is go up.
You can float it (as @JRodge01 said) or jack things up on stilts. Though both of those would take much more work and time than a barrier.
By the time you build something big enough to float the arc while it's being constructed, you've built the arc.
The effort of jacking things up (town, construction site, etc) would also boarder on the ridiculous.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Bottom line - find a higher ground for the ark's construction site.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
If you rule out barriers (which the Dutch have been using for a very long time), the only thing you can do is go up.
You can float it (as @JRodge01 said) or jack things up on stilts. Though both of those would take much more work and time than a barrier.
By the time you build something big enough to float the arc while it's being constructed, you've built the arc.
The effort of jacking things up (town, construction site, etc) would also boarder on the ridiculous.
$endgroup$
If you rule out barriers (which the Dutch have been using for a very long time), the only thing you can do is go up.
You can float it (as @JRodge01 said) or jack things up on stilts. Though both of those would take much more work and time than a barrier.
By the time you build something big enough to float the arc while it's being constructed, you've built the arc.
The effort of jacking things up (town, construction site, etc) would also boarder on the ridiculous.
answered 8 hours ago
ShadoCatShadoCat
16.2k21 silver badges56 bronze badges
16.2k21 silver badges56 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Bottom line - find a higher ground for the ark's construction site.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Bottom line - find a higher ground for the ark's construction site.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Bottom line - find a higher ground for the ark's construction site.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
Bottom line - find a higher ground for the ark's construction site.
$endgroup$
– Alexander
6 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Digging holes
More specifically, channels. Give the water somewhere to run that isn’t where your ark is. Piling the earth up as extra barriers (not to resist the water but to force it into other channels) is an excellent idea.
If your ark is on a slope then digging channels so the water rushes around it and down the hill will buy you time until the water level rises. Not a permanent measure, but it helps you survive.
This tactic is used all the time in flood management in times of great rainfall. Channels are opened up and used to selectI rly flood areas where the water will cause less damage, thus giving the more important areas (your ark) longer until they are overwhelmed.
Just try not to flood anything you need before you don’t need it any more.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't see channels working any better than barriers. Against an ocean's worth of water, any channel they could build would be nothing.
$endgroup$
– ShadoCat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This could work for a small flood, but if we're assuming a flood that covers the world or as much of the world as these people can reach, I'd think any channels you dig would simply overflow.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Shadocat: the same is true of all defences bar building... well, an ark. The channels merely give you an extra few hours or days to complete the job while the water is diverted elsewhere.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Jay: depends on how quickly the flood comes in. If it’s a flood due to, say, 40 days and nights of rain: you can assume that as long as your channels can divert the initial volume of water they’ll be good until they collapse or the reservoir you’re diverting to floods up to your level. If the ark is on a slope above a floodplain you could buy yourself days in a 40 days and nights style flood.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoeBloggs Alright, fair enough. I guess the question is, How much water do you have to be able to deal with? If the answer is "1 inch", then a solution is "wear boots". If the answer is "2000 feet", it's probably hopeless. In the middle I suppose there are a number of possibilities.
$endgroup$
– Jay
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Digging holes
More specifically, channels. Give the water somewhere to run that isn’t where your ark is. Piling the earth up as extra barriers (not to resist the water but to force it into other channels) is an excellent idea.
If your ark is on a slope then digging channels so the water rushes around it and down the hill will buy you time until the water level rises. Not a permanent measure, but it helps you survive.
This tactic is used all the time in flood management in times of great rainfall. Channels are opened up and used to selectI rly flood areas where the water will cause less damage, thus giving the more important areas (your ark) longer until they are overwhelmed.
Just try not to flood anything you need before you don’t need it any more.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't see channels working any better than barriers. Against an ocean's worth of water, any channel they could build would be nothing.
$endgroup$
– ShadoCat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This could work for a small flood, but if we're assuming a flood that covers the world or as much of the world as these people can reach, I'd think any channels you dig would simply overflow.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Shadocat: the same is true of all defences bar building... well, an ark. The channels merely give you an extra few hours or days to complete the job while the water is diverted elsewhere.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Jay: depends on how quickly the flood comes in. If it’s a flood due to, say, 40 days and nights of rain: you can assume that as long as your channels can divert the initial volume of water they’ll be good until they collapse or the reservoir you’re diverting to floods up to your level. If the ark is on a slope above a floodplain you could buy yourself days in a 40 days and nights style flood.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoeBloggs Alright, fair enough. I guess the question is, How much water do you have to be able to deal with? If the answer is "1 inch", then a solution is "wear boots". If the answer is "2000 feet", it's probably hopeless. In the middle I suppose there are a number of possibilities.
$endgroup$
– Jay
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Digging holes
More specifically, channels. Give the water somewhere to run that isn’t where your ark is. Piling the earth up as extra barriers (not to resist the water but to force it into other channels) is an excellent idea.
If your ark is on a slope then digging channels so the water rushes around it and down the hill will buy you time until the water level rises. Not a permanent measure, but it helps you survive.
This tactic is used all the time in flood management in times of great rainfall. Channels are opened up and used to selectI rly flood areas where the water will cause less damage, thus giving the more important areas (your ark) longer until they are overwhelmed.
Just try not to flood anything you need before you don’t need it any more.
$endgroup$
Digging holes
More specifically, channels. Give the water somewhere to run that isn’t where your ark is. Piling the earth up as extra barriers (not to resist the water but to force it into other channels) is an excellent idea.
If your ark is on a slope then digging channels so the water rushes around it and down the hill will buy you time until the water level rises. Not a permanent measure, but it helps you survive.
This tactic is used all the time in flood management in times of great rainfall. Channels are opened up and used to selectI rly flood areas where the water will cause less damage, thus giving the more important areas (your ark) longer until they are overwhelmed.
Just try not to flood anything you need before you don’t need it any more.
answered 9 hours ago
Joe BloggsJoe Bloggs
39.4k20 gold badges108 silver badges198 bronze badges
39.4k20 gold badges108 silver badges198 bronze badges
$begingroup$
I don't see channels working any better than barriers. Against an ocean's worth of water, any channel they could build would be nothing.
$endgroup$
– ShadoCat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This could work for a small flood, but if we're assuming a flood that covers the world or as much of the world as these people can reach, I'd think any channels you dig would simply overflow.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Shadocat: the same is true of all defences bar building... well, an ark. The channels merely give you an extra few hours or days to complete the job while the water is diverted elsewhere.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Jay: depends on how quickly the flood comes in. If it’s a flood due to, say, 40 days and nights of rain: you can assume that as long as your channels can divert the initial volume of water they’ll be good until they collapse or the reservoir you’re diverting to floods up to your level. If the ark is on a slope above a floodplain you could buy yourself days in a 40 days and nights style flood.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoeBloggs Alright, fair enough. I guess the question is, How much water do you have to be able to deal with? If the answer is "1 inch", then a solution is "wear boots". If the answer is "2000 feet", it's probably hopeless. In the middle I suppose there are a number of possibilities.
$endgroup$
– Jay
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I don't see channels working any better than barriers. Against an ocean's worth of water, any channel they could build would be nothing.
$endgroup$
– ShadoCat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This could work for a small flood, but if we're assuming a flood that covers the world or as much of the world as these people can reach, I'd think any channels you dig would simply overflow.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Shadocat: the same is true of all defences bar building... well, an ark. The channels merely give you an extra few hours or days to complete the job while the water is diverted elsewhere.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Jay: depends on how quickly the flood comes in. If it’s a flood due to, say, 40 days and nights of rain: you can assume that as long as your channels can divert the initial volume of water they’ll be good until they collapse or the reservoir you’re diverting to floods up to your level. If the ark is on a slope above a floodplain you could buy yourself days in a 40 days and nights style flood.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoeBloggs Alright, fair enough. I guess the question is, How much water do you have to be able to deal with? If the answer is "1 inch", then a solution is "wear boots". If the answer is "2000 feet", it's probably hopeless. In the middle I suppose there are a number of possibilities.
$endgroup$
– Jay
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don't see channels working any better than barriers. Against an ocean's worth of water, any channel they could build would be nothing.
$endgroup$
– ShadoCat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don't see channels working any better than barriers. Against an ocean's worth of water, any channel they could build would be nothing.
$endgroup$
– ShadoCat
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This could work for a small flood, but if we're assuming a flood that covers the world or as much of the world as these people can reach, I'd think any channels you dig would simply overflow.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
This could work for a small flood, but if we're assuming a flood that covers the world or as much of the world as these people can reach, I'd think any channels you dig would simply overflow.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Shadocat: the same is true of all defences bar building... well, an ark. The channels merely give you an extra few hours or days to complete the job while the water is diverted elsewhere.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Shadocat: the same is true of all defences bar building... well, an ark. The channels merely give you an extra few hours or days to complete the job while the water is diverted elsewhere.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Jay: depends on how quickly the flood comes in. If it’s a flood due to, say, 40 days and nights of rain: you can assume that as long as your channels can divert the initial volume of water they’ll be good until they collapse or the reservoir you’re diverting to floods up to your level. If the ark is on a slope above a floodplain you could buy yourself days in a 40 days and nights style flood.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Jay: depends on how quickly the flood comes in. If it’s a flood due to, say, 40 days and nights of rain: you can assume that as long as your channels can divert the initial volume of water they’ll be good until they collapse or the reservoir you’re diverting to floods up to your level. If the ark is on a slope above a floodplain you could buy yourself days in a 40 days and nights style flood.
$endgroup$
– Joe Bloggs
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoeBloggs Alright, fair enough. I guess the question is, How much water do you have to be able to deal with? If the answer is "1 inch", then a solution is "wear boots". If the answer is "2000 feet", it's probably hopeless. In the middle I suppose there are a number of possibilities.
$endgroup$
– Jay
5 hours ago
$begingroup$
@JoeBloggs Alright, fair enough. I guess the question is, How much water do you have to be able to deal with? If the answer is "1 inch", then a solution is "wear boots". If the answer is "2000 feet", it's probably hopeless. In the middle I suppose there are a number of possibilities.
$endgroup$
– Jay
5 hours ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
A village on an island presumably has boats or other sort of sea-faring devices. Perhaps some sort of floating construction platform that isn't sustainable long-term, but able to be sustained long enough for construction to finish.
For the coastal village you could have walls that angle the water elsewhere as a stalling tactic until the water goes over the wall. Very old civilizations use qanats as a way to bring water from one place to another. I'd assume that this could also be used as a way to divert flood water.
Channals or trenches to divert water to the other side of a walled village, or utilizing local ravines and valleys to carry off water would also provide time.
That said, unless major foresight existed prior to the beginning of the ark's construction, I don't believe there'd be any solution that would buy more time than contributing to the are.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
A village on an island presumably has boats or other sort of sea-faring devices. Perhaps some sort of floating construction platform that isn't sustainable long-term, but able to be sustained long enough for construction to finish.
For the coastal village you could have walls that angle the water elsewhere as a stalling tactic until the water goes over the wall. Very old civilizations use qanats as a way to bring water from one place to another. I'd assume that this could also be used as a way to divert flood water.
Channals or trenches to divert water to the other side of a walled village, or utilizing local ravines and valleys to carry off water would also provide time.
That said, unless major foresight existed prior to the beginning of the ark's construction, I don't believe there'd be any solution that would buy more time than contributing to the are.
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
A village on an island presumably has boats or other sort of sea-faring devices. Perhaps some sort of floating construction platform that isn't sustainable long-term, but able to be sustained long enough for construction to finish.
For the coastal village you could have walls that angle the water elsewhere as a stalling tactic until the water goes over the wall. Very old civilizations use qanats as a way to bring water from one place to another. I'd assume that this could also be used as a way to divert flood water.
Channals or trenches to divert water to the other side of a walled village, or utilizing local ravines and valleys to carry off water would also provide time.
That said, unless major foresight existed prior to the beginning of the ark's construction, I don't believe there'd be any solution that would buy more time than contributing to the are.
New contributor
$endgroup$
A village on an island presumably has boats or other sort of sea-faring devices. Perhaps some sort of floating construction platform that isn't sustainable long-term, but able to be sustained long enough for construction to finish.
For the coastal village you could have walls that angle the water elsewhere as a stalling tactic until the water goes over the wall. Very old civilizations use qanats as a way to bring water from one place to another. I'd assume that this could also be used as a way to divert flood water.
Channals or trenches to divert water to the other side of a walled village, or utilizing local ravines and valleys to carry off water would also provide time.
That said, unless major foresight existed prior to the beginning of the ark's construction, I don't believe there'd be any solution that would buy more time than contributing to the are.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 8 hours ago
JRodge01JRodge01
1511 bronze badge
1511 bronze badge
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Cave.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/biggest-longest-five-amazing-caves-visit-180952892/
Your people move the ark into the cave. As the shipwrights work, stonemasons wall off the entrance. The stonemasons were relegated to making sandwiches and giving backrubs during the ark project, and are happy to be back to work making things out of stone.
When the ark is done they break the wall and the water rushes in. The ark is lifted up to the entrance and leaves.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Better still, a cave that starts low and travels up; it will form a natural moonpool when it floods and the upper levels of the cave will stay dry. Probably won't be big enough to build an ark though, and you'll want a snorkel from the top of the cave to the top of the floodwater.
$endgroup$
– Logan Pickup
40 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Cave.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/biggest-longest-five-amazing-caves-visit-180952892/
Your people move the ark into the cave. As the shipwrights work, stonemasons wall off the entrance. The stonemasons were relegated to making sandwiches and giving backrubs during the ark project, and are happy to be back to work making things out of stone.
When the ark is done they break the wall and the water rushes in. The ark is lifted up to the entrance and leaves.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Better still, a cave that starts low and travels up; it will form a natural moonpool when it floods and the upper levels of the cave will stay dry. Probably won't be big enough to build an ark though, and you'll want a snorkel from the top of the cave to the top of the floodwater.
$endgroup$
– Logan Pickup
40 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Cave.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/biggest-longest-five-amazing-caves-visit-180952892/
Your people move the ark into the cave. As the shipwrights work, stonemasons wall off the entrance. The stonemasons were relegated to making sandwiches and giving backrubs during the ark project, and are happy to be back to work making things out of stone.
When the ark is done they break the wall and the water rushes in. The ark is lifted up to the entrance and leaves.
$endgroup$
Cave.
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/biggest-longest-five-amazing-caves-visit-180952892/
Your people move the ark into the cave. As the shipwrights work, stonemasons wall off the entrance. The stonemasons were relegated to making sandwiches and giving backrubs during the ark project, and are happy to be back to work making things out of stone.
When the ark is done they break the wall and the water rushes in. The ark is lifted up to the entrance and leaves.
answered 6 hours ago
WillkWillk
138k34 gold badges262 silver badges573 bronze badges
138k34 gold badges262 silver badges573 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Better still, a cave that starts low and travels up; it will form a natural moonpool when it floods and the upper levels of the cave will stay dry. Probably won't be big enough to build an ark though, and you'll want a snorkel from the top of the cave to the top of the floodwater.
$endgroup$
– Logan Pickup
40 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
Better still, a cave that starts low and travels up; it will form a natural moonpool when it floods and the upper levels of the cave will stay dry. Probably won't be big enough to build an ark though, and you'll want a snorkel from the top of the cave to the top of the floodwater.
$endgroup$
– Logan Pickup
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
Better still, a cave that starts low and travels up; it will form a natural moonpool when it floods and the upper levels of the cave will stay dry. Probably won't be big enough to build an ark though, and you'll want a snorkel from the top of the cave to the top of the floodwater.
$endgroup$
– Logan Pickup
40 mins ago
$begingroup$
Better still, a cave that starts low and travels up; it will form a natural moonpool when it floods and the upper levels of the cave will stay dry. Probably won't be big enough to build an ark though, and you'll want a snorkel from the top of the cave to the top of the floodwater.
$endgroup$
– Logan Pickup
40 mins ago
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I would think that building a wall to hold back the water would be more work than finishing the ark. The wall would have to be at least as big as the ark.
You could build a floating dock for your ark, but again, that's probably more work than finishing the ark.
I presume if the society is medieval we're ruling out aircraft or traveling to the Moon.
I'm hard pressed to think of what you could do that would be faster or easier than finishing the ark.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I would think that building a wall to hold back the water would be more work than finishing the ark. The wall would have to be at least as big as the ark.
You could build a floating dock for your ark, but again, that's probably more work than finishing the ark.
I presume if the society is medieval we're ruling out aircraft or traveling to the Moon.
I'm hard pressed to think of what you could do that would be faster or easier than finishing the ark.
$endgroup$
add a comment
|
$begingroup$
I would think that building a wall to hold back the water would be more work than finishing the ark. The wall would have to be at least as big as the ark.
You could build a floating dock for your ark, but again, that's probably more work than finishing the ark.
I presume if the society is medieval we're ruling out aircraft or traveling to the Moon.
I'm hard pressed to think of what you could do that would be faster or easier than finishing the ark.
$endgroup$
I would think that building a wall to hold back the water would be more work than finishing the ark. The wall would have to be at least as big as the ark.
You could build a floating dock for your ark, but again, that's probably more work than finishing the ark.
I presume if the society is medieval we're ruling out aircraft or traveling to the Moon.
I'm hard pressed to think of what you could do that would be faster or easier than finishing the ark.
answered 6 hours ago
JayJay
11.1k1 gold badge21 silver badges37 bronze badges
11.1k1 gold badge21 silver badges37 bronze badges
add a comment
|
add a comment
|
Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f155930%2ffight-a-biblical-flood-apart-from-building-barriers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
This whole 'ark' thing isn't a trick to get rid of the telephone sanitizers, account executives, hairdressers, TV producers, insurance salesmen, personnel officers, security guards, public relations executives, and management consultants, right?
$endgroup$
– user535733
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
I have to admit that the word biblical was probably a bad choice but it was a short succinct word which saved me a lot of explanation. The reason for the flood is unknown so therfore it cannot be prevented by religion or something like that. The ark is used to save the civilization and to get to a save place when the flood is over.
$endgroup$
– Gistiv
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv It probably would have been better to say "a global flood or something that would seem global to them". But I think we get the point.
$endgroup$
– Jay
6 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Gistiv If we are to assume that the flood was known about in advance (else why build an ark) why would they not build it on higher-ground with a launch ramp? This all seems not-well-defined and therefore opinion-based. When you say "maybe some little magic is possible", unless you tell us what you are allowing and disallowing in your world, why would "The ark and materials and town was all levitated out the way" not be a valid answer? Maybe it is. Please edit your question to provide some clarity as to what it is that you want to know.
$endgroup$
– Chickens are not cows
5 hours ago