SQL Server Always-On Availability Groups PatchingPatching SQL Server 2012patching SQL Server with Availability Group and Secondary ReplicaLogin in Always On Availability GroupsSQL 2014 Always On Availability Groups - Read ReplicaDoes SQL Server 2017 CU1 break clusterless availability groups?

Applications of mathematics in clinical setting

How do rulers get rich from war?

Plausibility and performance of a composite longbow

What is this WWII four-engine plane on skis?

Microservices and Stored Procedures

How far away from you does grass spread?

Should the pagination be reset when changing the order?

Can Brexit be undone in an emergency?

Is this adjustment to the Lucky feat underpowered?

Could the Orion project pusher plate model be used for asteroid deflection?

What if I don't know whether my program will be linked to a GPL library or not?

Cube around 2 points with correct perspective

Why do we need to use transistors when building an OR gate?

Cassiopeia Sleeper Train Japan - Tours?

Unpredictability of Stock Market

Can we have a C++ function with multiple return types? ( C++11 and above)

All numbers in a 5x5 Minesweeper grid

What is the origin of the “clerics can create water” trope?

Can I separate garlic into cloves for storage?

Is it possible that the shadow of The Moon is a single dot during solar eclipse?

Delete empty subfolders, keep parent folder

Name of example of irrationality of proportional and absolute cost

What is Cousin Itt in The Addams Family?

Why do things cool off?



SQL Server Always-On Availability Groups Patching


Patching SQL Server 2012patching SQL Server with Availability Group and Secondary ReplicaLogin in Always On Availability GroupsSQL 2014 Always On Availability Groups - Read ReplicaDoes SQL Server 2017 CU1 break clusterless availability groups?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















My SQL server farm has been neglected with patching OS level & SQL server level (because they are critical systems, outages are hard to come by).



An option is to patch the secondary nodes of our AOAG clusters up to the latest patch one month, then the next month the business agree to schedule a fail over out of hours.. I can then patch the new secondary (old primary). This will mean the nodes wont be on the same patch level for a month.. is this “a no no”?










share|improve this question





















  • 3





    What is the reasoning for patching in different months? If you plan a date for a failover, why not patch the secondaries just before the scheduled failover? This would significantly reduce the amount of time that you are running different versions of SQL Server.

    – Taryn
    8 hours ago











  • how long do your failovers take? are you seeing connection issues when you fail over? you shouldn't be seeing much of a down time when failing over. we patch on a monthly cycle and we're basically a 24/7 shop.

    – DForck42
    26 mins ago












  • also, how many ag's and how many nodes? are they all sync? mix of sync and async?

    – DForck42
    25 mins ago

















3















My SQL server farm has been neglected with patching OS level & SQL server level (because they are critical systems, outages are hard to come by).



An option is to patch the secondary nodes of our AOAG clusters up to the latest patch one month, then the next month the business agree to schedule a fail over out of hours.. I can then patch the new secondary (old primary). This will mean the nodes wont be on the same patch level for a month.. is this “a no no”?










share|improve this question





















  • 3





    What is the reasoning for patching in different months? If you plan a date for a failover, why not patch the secondaries just before the scheduled failover? This would significantly reduce the amount of time that you are running different versions of SQL Server.

    – Taryn
    8 hours ago











  • how long do your failovers take? are you seeing connection issues when you fail over? you shouldn't be seeing much of a down time when failing over. we patch on a monthly cycle and we're basically a 24/7 shop.

    – DForck42
    26 mins ago












  • also, how many ag's and how many nodes? are they all sync? mix of sync and async?

    – DForck42
    25 mins ago













3












3








3








My SQL server farm has been neglected with patching OS level & SQL server level (because they are critical systems, outages are hard to come by).



An option is to patch the secondary nodes of our AOAG clusters up to the latest patch one month, then the next month the business agree to schedule a fail over out of hours.. I can then patch the new secondary (old primary). This will mean the nodes wont be on the same patch level for a month.. is this “a no no”?










share|improve this question
















My SQL server farm has been neglected with patching OS level & SQL server level (because they are critical systems, outages are hard to come by).



An option is to patch the secondary nodes of our AOAG clusters up to the latest patch one month, then the next month the business agree to schedule a fail over out of hours.. I can then patch the new secondary (old primary). This will mean the nodes wont be on the same patch level for a month.. is this “a no no”?







sql-server availability-groups patching






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 6 hours ago









Ross

538 bronze badges




538 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









Daniel NashDaniel Nash

786 bronze badges




786 bronze badges










  • 3





    What is the reasoning for patching in different months? If you plan a date for a failover, why not patch the secondaries just before the scheduled failover? This would significantly reduce the amount of time that you are running different versions of SQL Server.

    – Taryn
    8 hours ago











  • how long do your failovers take? are you seeing connection issues when you fail over? you shouldn't be seeing much of a down time when failing over. we patch on a monthly cycle and we're basically a 24/7 shop.

    – DForck42
    26 mins ago












  • also, how many ag's and how many nodes? are they all sync? mix of sync and async?

    – DForck42
    25 mins ago












  • 3





    What is the reasoning for patching in different months? If you plan a date for a failover, why not patch the secondaries just before the scheduled failover? This would significantly reduce the amount of time that you are running different versions of SQL Server.

    – Taryn
    8 hours ago











  • how long do your failovers take? are you seeing connection issues when you fail over? you shouldn't be seeing much of a down time when failing over. we patch on a monthly cycle and we're basically a 24/7 shop.

    – DForck42
    26 mins ago












  • also, how many ag's and how many nodes? are they all sync? mix of sync and async?

    – DForck42
    25 mins ago







3




3





What is the reasoning for patching in different months? If you plan a date for a failover, why not patch the secondaries just before the scheduled failover? This would significantly reduce the amount of time that you are running different versions of SQL Server.

– Taryn
8 hours ago





What is the reasoning for patching in different months? If you plan a date for a failover, why not patch the secondaries just before the scheduled failover? This would significantly reduce the amount of time that you are running different versions of SQL Server.

– Taryn
8 hours ago













how long do your failovers take? are you seeing connection issues when you fail over? you shouldn't be seeing much of a down time when failing over. we patch on a monthly cycle and we're basically a 24/7 shop.

– DForck42
26 mins ago






how long do your failovers take? are you seeing connection issues when you fail over? you shouldn't be seeing much of a down time when failing over. we patch on a monthly cycle and we're basically a 24/7 shop.

– DForck42
26 mins ago














also, how many ag's and how many nodes? are they all sync? mix of sync and async?

– DForck42
25 mins ago





also, how many ag's and how many nodes? are they all sync? mix of sync and async?

– DForck42
25 mins ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















6
















This is an unsupported configuration as per the docs




Mixing versions of SQL Server instances in the same AG is not supported outside of a rolling upgrade and should not exist in that state for extended periods of time as the upgrade should take place quickly. The other option for upgrading SQL Server 2016 and later is through the use of a distributed availability group.




What does this mean practically? It might be completely fine - there may be zero compatibility issues and it could go swimmingly. It also might not. Microsoft has not tested the configuration you are running if you choose to mix versions between instances. At that point for me personally, the risks far outweigh the advantages.



It's also worth noting that using the rolling upgrade process as defined in the link I posted reduces downtime to a minimal figure anyway. If that's still not good enough, why not build two new servers and a new AG, and migrate to them, rather than patching? It's a lot more work but you should be able to minimise downtime even further.






share|improve this answer


































    1
















    Patch your secondary server, on the day of your down time, but finish before your down time.



    Failover to it as scheduled.



    Patch the primary server, as soon as you complete the failover and are stable.



    Both servers should be built the same, so it really should not matter which one is primary. But if you care, fail back at a different down time window.



    Or better yet, add a listener to your AG, have the application point to the Listener (not all applications can do this), you can patch the servers one after the other every month, and the only down time is the first time the application re-points to the listener.






    share|improve this answer
































      0

















      An option is to patch the secondary node of AOAG clusters up to the latest patch, then the next month the business agree to schedule a fail over out of hours.. I can then patch the new secondary (old primary).




      When you plan for patch update you must plan it for all replicas in AG to keep solution really Always On, it's one of core advantage of Availability Groups that server maintenance can be done without downtime.



      In your approach your breaking the term of Always-on business continuity, for example, when you update secondary replica, leave primary replica without updating. For some-reason you wanted to fail-over to the secondary, that moment on-wards it may not fail-back over to the original primary again - one of the reason that the databases always upgraded to newer version but never be downgraded, there must be some workaround (scripting out) to downgrade the DB version, in this case when you cannot fail-back over to primary replica it's not Always On, thus, it's recommended to schedule patch update for all replicas together with recommended order..



      Although, there is no down-time, the better time to perform patch updated is during less overload on the servers. Before proceeding, you may want to consider (if not configured already) Node and fail-share majority quorum configuration at WSFC as it's recommended when there are even number of nodes in WSFC, so the file-share witness maintain a vote to keep healthy quorum and cluster resources healthy (listeners) especially when secondary node is offline which normal during patch update.



      Following query would be helpful to see the synchronization health (it's essential before and after doing patch update), some info cannot be available in the availability group dashboard but you can get it though DMVs (as follows):



      select db.name, 
      db.database_id,
      ag.name as GroupName,
      state_desc,
      recovery_model_desc,
      log_reuse_wait_desc,
      AGDB.truncation_lsn,
      Rep.replica_server_name,
      rep.endpoint_url,
      DBRepStats.is_primary_replica,
      DBRepStats.synchronization_health_desc,
      DBRepStats.database_state_desc,
      (redo_queue_size / 1024.0) as redo_queue_size_MB,
      last_redone_time,
      last_redone_lsn,
      DBRepStats.end_of_log_lsn,
      DBRepStats.last_sent_lsn,
      DBRepStats.last_sent_time,
      DBRepStats.last_received_lsn,
      DBRepStats.last_received_time,
      DBRepStats.last_hardened_lsn,
      DBRepStats.last_hardened_time
      from sys.databases as db
      left outer join sys.availability_databases_cluster as AGDB on db.group_database_id = AGDB.group_database_id
      left outer join sys.dm_hadr_database_replica_states as DBRepStats on db.group_database_id = DBRepStats.group_database_id
      left outer join sys.availability_replicas as Rep on DBRepStats.group_id = Rep.group_id and DBRepStats.replica_id = Rep.replica_id
      left outer join sys.availability_groups as AG on DBRepStats.group_id = AG.group_id
      where db.database_id > 4





      share|improve this answer



























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "182"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );














        draft saved

        draft discarded
















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f248866%2fsql-server-always-on-availability-groups-patching%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        6
















        This is an unsupported configuration as per the docs




        Mixing versions of SQL Server instances in the same AG is not supported outside of a rolling upgrade and should not exist in that state for extended periods of time as the upgrade should take place quickly. The other option for upgrading SQL Server 2016 and later is through the use of a distributed availability group.




        What does this mean practically? It might be completely fine - there may be zero compatibility issues and it could go swimmingly. It also might not. Microsoft has not tested the configuration you are running if you choose to mix versions between instances. At that point for me personally, the risks far outweigh the advantages.



        It's also worth noting that using the rolling upgrade process as defined in the link I posted reduces downtime to a minimal figure anyway. If that's still not good enough, why not build two new servers and a new AG, and migrate to them, rather than patching? It's a lot more work but you should be able to minimise downtime even further.






        share|improve this answer































          6
















          This is an unsupported configuration as per the docs




          Mixing versions of SQL Server instances in the same AG is not supported outside of a rolling upgrade and should not exist in that state for extended periods of time as the upgrade should take place quickly. The other option for upgrading SQL Server 2016 and later is through the use of a distributed availability group.




          What does this mean practically? It might be completely fine - there may be zero compatibility issues and it could go swimmingly. It also might not. Microsoft has not tested the configuration you are running if you choose to mix versions between instances. At that point for me personally, the risks far outweigh the advantages.



          It's also worth noting that using the rolling upgrade process as defined in the link I posted reduces downtime to a minimal figure anyway. If that's still not good enough, why not build two new servers and a new AG, and migrate to them, rather than patching? It's a lot more work but you should be able to minimise downtime even further.






          share|improve this answer





























            6














            6










            6









            This is an unsupported configuration as per the docs




            Mixing versions of SQL Server instances in the same AG is not supported outside of a rolling upgrade and should not exist in that state for extended periods of time as the upgrade should take place quickly. The other option for upgrading SQL Server 2016 and later is through the use of a distributed availability group.




            What does this mean practically? It might be completely fine - there may be zero compatibility issues and it could go swimmingly. It also might not. Microsoft has not tested the configuration you are running if you choose to mix versions between instances. At that point for me personally, the risks far outweigh the advantages.



            It's also worth noting that using the rolling upgrade process as defined in the link I posted reduces downtime to a minimal figure anyway. If that's still not good enough, why not build two new servers and a new AG, and migrate to them, rather than patching? It's a lot more work but you should be able to minimise downtime even further.






            share|improve this answer















            This is an unsupported configuration as per the docs




            Mixing versions of SQL Server instances in the same AG is not supported outside of a rolling upgrade and should not exist in that state for extended periods of time as the upgrade should take place quickly. The other option for upgrading SQL Server 2016 and later is through the use of a distributed availability group.




            What does this mean practically? It might be completely fine - there may be zero compatibility issues and it could go swimmingly. It also might not. Microsoft has not tested the configuration you are running if you choose to mix versions between instances. At that point for me personally, the risks far outweigh the advantages.



            It's also worth noting that using the rolling upgrade process as defined in the link I posted reduces downtime to a minimal figure anyway. If that's still not good enough, why not build two new servers and a new AG, and migrate to them, rather than patching? It's a lot more work but you should be able to minimise downtime even further.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 9 hours ago

























            answered 9 hours ago









            George.PalaciosGeorge.Palacios

            4,40611 silver badges33 bronze badges




            4,40611 silver badges33 bronze badges


























                1
















                Patch your secondary server, on the day of your down time, but finish before your down time.



                Failover to it as scheduled.



                Patch the primary server, as soon as you complete the failover and are stable.



                Both servers should be built the same, so it really should not matter which one is primary. But if you care, fail back at a different down time window.



                Or better yet, add a listener to your AG, have the application point to the Listener (not all applications can do this), you can patch the servers one after the other every month, and the only down time is the first time the application re-points to the listener.






                share|improve this answer





























                  1
















                  Patch your secondary server, on the day of your down time, but finish before your down time.



                  Failover to it as scheduled.



                  Patch the primary server, as soon as you complete the failover and are stable.



                  Both servers should be built the same, so it really should not matter which one is primary. But if you care, fail back at a different down time window.



                  Or better yet, add a listener to your AG, have the application point to the Listener (not all applications can do this), you can patch the servers one after the other every month, and the only down time is the first time the application re-points to the listener.






                  share|improve this answer



























                    1














                    1










                    1









                    Patch your secondary server, on the day of your down time, but finish before your down time.



                    Failover to it as scheduled.



                    Patch the primary server, as soon as you complete the failover and are stable.



                    Both servers should be built the same, so it really should not matter which one is primary. But if you care, fail back at a different down time window.



                    Or better yet, add a listener to your AG, have the application point to the Listener (not all applications can do this), you can patch the servers one after the other every month, and the only down time is the first time the application re-points to the listener.






                    share|improve this answer













                    Patch your secondary server, on the day of your down time, but finish before your down time.



                    Failover to it as scheduled.



                    Patch the primary server, as soon as you complete the failover and are stable.



                    Both servers should be built the same, so it really should not matter which one is primary. But if you care, fail back at a different down time window.



                    Or better yet, add a listener to your AG, have the application point to the Listener (not all applications can do this), you can patch the servers one after the other every month, and the only down time is the first time the application re-points to the listener.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 hours ago









                    James JenkinsJames Jenkins

                    2,7782 gold badges25 silver badges52 bronze badges




                    2,7782 gold badges25 silver badges52 bronze badges
























                        0

















                        An option is to patch the secondary node of AOAG clusters up to the latest patch, then the next month the business agree to schedule a fail over out of hours.. I can then patch the new secondary (old primary).




                        When you plan for patch update you must plan it for all replicas in AG to keep solution really Always On, it's one of core advantage of Availability Groups that server maintenance can be done without downtime.



                        In your approach your breaking the term of Always-on business continuity, for example, when you update secondary replica, leave primary replica without updating. For some-reason you wanted to fail-over to the secondary, that moment on-wards it may not fail-back over to the original primary again - one of the reason that the databases always upgraded to newer version but never be downgraded, there must be some workaround (scripting out) to downgrade the DB version, in this case when you cannot fail-back over to primary replica it's not Always On, thus, it's recommended to schedule patch update for all replicas together with recommended order..



                        Although, there is no down-time, the better time to perform patch updated is during less overload on the servers. Before proceeding, you may want to consider (if not configured already) Node and fail-share majority quorum configuration at WSFC as it's recommended when there are even number of nodes in WSFC, so the file-share witness maintain a vote to keep healthy quorum and cluster resources healthy (listeners) especially when secondary node is offline which normal during patch update.



                        Following query would be helpful to see the synchronization health (it's essential before and after doing patch update), some info cannot be available in the availability group dashboard but you can get it though DMVs (as follows):



                        select db.name, 
                        db.database_id,
                        ag.name as GroupName,
                        state_desc,
                        recovery_model_desc,
                        log_reuse_wait_desc,
                        AGDB.truncation_lsn,
                        Rep.replica_server_name,
                        rep.endpoint_url,
                        DBRepStats.is_primary_replica,
                        DBRepStats.synchronization_health_desc,
                        DBRepStats.database_state_desc,
                        (redo_queue_size / 1024.0) as redo_queue_size_MB,
                        last_redone_time,
                        last_redone_lsn,
                        DBRepStats.end_of_log_lsn,
                        DBRepStats.last_sent_lsn,
                        DBRepStats.last_sent_time,
                        DBRepStats.last_received_lsn,
                        DBRepStats.last_received_time,
                        DBRepStats.last_hardened_lsn,
                        DBRepStats.last_hardened_time
                        from sys.databases as db
                        left outer join sys.availability_databases_cluster as AGDB on db.group_database_id = AGDB.group_database_id
                        left outer join sys.dm_hadr_database_replica_states as DBRepStats on db.group_database_id = DBRepStats.group_database_id
                        left outer join sys.availability_replicas as Rep on DBRepStats.group_id = Rep.group_id and DBRepStats.replica_id = Rep.replica_id
                        left outer join sys.availability_groups as AG on DBRepStats.group_id = AG.group_id
                        where db.database_id > 4





                        share|improve this answer





























                          0

















                          An option is to patch the secondary node of AOAG clusters up to the latest patch, then the next month the business agree to schedule a fail over out of hours.. I can then patch the new secondary (old primary).




                          When you plan for patch update you must plan it for all replicas in AG to keep solution really Always On, it's one of core advantage of Availability Groups that server maintenance can be done without downtime.



                          In your approach your breaking the term of Always-on business continuity, for example, when you update secondary replica, leave primary replica without updating. For some-reason you wanted to fail-over to the secondary, that moment on-wards it may not fail-back over to the original primary again - one of the reason that the databases always upgraded to newer version but never be downgraded, there must be some workaround (scripting out) to downgrade the DB version, in this case when you cannot fail-back over to primary replica it's not Always On, thus, it's recommended to schedule patch update for all replicas together with recommended order..



                          Although, there is no down-time, the better time to perform patch updated is during less overload on the servers. Before proceeding, you may want to consider (if not configured already) Node and fail-share majority quorum configuration at WSFC as it's recommended when there are even number of nodes in WSFC, so the file-share witness maintain a vote to keep healthy quorum and cluster resources healthy (listeners) especially when secondary node is offline which normal during patch update.



                          Following query would be helpful to see the synchronization health (it's essential before and after doing patch update), some info cannot be available in the availability group dashboard but you can get it though DMVs (as follows):



                          select db.name, 
                          db.database_id,
                          ag.name as GroupName,
                          state_desc,
                          recovery_model_desc,
                          log_reuse_wait_desc,
                          AGDB.truncation_lsn,
                          Rep.replica_server_name,
                          rep.endpoint_url,
                          DBRepStats.is_primary_replica,
                          DBRepStats.synchronization_health_desc,
                          DBRepStats.database_state_desc,
                          (redo_queue_size / 1024.0) as redo_queue_size_MB,
                          last_redone_time,
                          last_redone_lsn,
                          DBRepStats.end_of_log_lsn,
                          DBRepStats.last_sent_lsn,
                          DBRepStats.last_sent_time,
                          DBRepStats.last_received_lsn,
                          DBRepStats.last_received_time,
                          DBRepStats.last_hardened_lsn,
                          DBRepStats.last_hardened_time
                          from sys.databases as db
                          left outer join sys.availability_databases_cluster as AGDB on db.group_database_id = AGDB.group_database_id
                          left outer join sys.dm_hadr_database_replica_states as DBRepStats on db.group_database_id = DBRepStats.group_database_id
                          left outer join sys.availability_replicas as Rep on DBRepStats.group_id = Rep.group_id and DBRepStats.replica_id = Rep.replica_id
                          left outer join sys.availability_groups as AG on DBRepStats.group_id = AG.group_id
                          where db.database_id > 4





                          share|improve this answer



























                            0














                            0










                            0










                            An option is to patch the secondary node of AOAG clusters up to the latest patch, then the next month the business agree to schedule a fail over out of hours.. I can then patch the new secondary (old primary).




                            When you plan for patch update you must plan it for all replicas in AG to keep solution really Always On, it's one of core advantage of Availability Groups that server maintenance can be done without downtime.



                            In your approach your breaking the term of Always-on business continuity, for example, when you update secondary replica, leave primary replica without updating. For some-reason you wanted to fail-over to the secondary, that moment on-wards it may not fail-back over to the original primary again - one of the reason that the databases always upgraded to newer version but never be downgraded, there must be some workaround (scripting out) to downgrade the DB version, in this case when you cannot fail-back over to primary replica it's not Always On, thus, it's recommended to schedule patch update for all replicas together with recommended order..



                            Although, there is no down-time, the better time to perform patch updated is during less overload on the servers. Before proceeding, you may want to consider (if not configured already) Node and fail-share majority quorum configuration at WSFC as it's recommended when there are even number of nodes in WSFC, so the file-share witness maintain a vote to keep healthy quorum and cluster resources healthy (listeners) especially when secondary node is offline which normal during patch update.



                            Following query would be helpful to see the synchronization health (it's essential before and after doing patch update), some info cannot be available in the availability group dashboard but you can get it though DMVs (as follows):



                            select db.name, 
                            db.database_id,
                            ag.name as GroupName,
                            state_desc,
                            recovery_model_desc,
                            log_reuse_wait_desc,
                            AGDB.truncation_lsn,
                            Rep.replica_server_name,
                            rep.endpoint_url,
                            DBRepStats.is_primary_replica,
                            DBRepStats.synchronization_health_desc,
                            DBRepStats.database_state_desc,
                            (redo_queue_size / 1024.0) as redo_queue_size_MB,
                            last_redone_time,
                            last_redone_lsn,
                            DBRepStats.end_of_log_lsn,
                            DBRepStats.last_sent_lsn,
                            DBRepStats.last_sent_time,
                            DBRepStats.last_received_lsn,
                            DBRepStats.last_received_time,
                            DBRepStats.last_hardened_lsn,
                            DBRepStats.last_hardened_time
                            from sys.databases as db
                            left outer join sys.availability_databases_cluster as AGDB on db.group_database_id = AGDB.group_database_id
                            left outer join sys.dm_hadr_database_replica_states as DBRepStats on db.group_database_id = DBRepStats.group_database_id
                            left outer join sys.availability_replicas as Rep on DBRepStats.group_id = Rep.group_id and DBRepStats.replica_id = Rep.replica_id
                            left outer join sys.availability_groups as AG on DBRepStats.group_id = AG.group_id
                            where db.database_id > 4





                            share|improve this answer














                            An option is to patch the secondary node of AOAG clusters up to the latest patch, then the next month the business agree to schedule a fail over out of hours.. I can then patch the new secondary (old primary).




                            When you plan for patch update you must plan it for all replicas in AG to keep solution really Always On, it's one of core advantage of Availability Groups that server maintenance can be done without downtime.



                            In your approach your breaking the term of Always-on business continuity, for example, when you update secondary replica, leave primary replica without updating. For some-reason you wanted to fail-over to the secondary, that moment on-wards it may not fail-back over to the original primary again - one of the reason that the databases always upgraded to newer version but never be downgraded, there must be some workaround (scripting out) to downgrade the DB version, in this case when you cannot fail-back over to primary replica it's not Always On, thus, it's recommended to schedule patch update for all replicas together with recommended order..



                            Although, there is no down-time, the better time to perform patch updated is during less overload on the servers. Before proceeding, you may want to consider (if not configured already) Node and fail-share majority quorum configuration at WSFC as it's recommended when there are even number of nodes in WSFC, so the file-share witness maintain a vote to keep healthy quorum and cluster resources healthy (listeners) especially when secondary node is offline which normal during patch update.



                            Following query would be helpful to see the synchronization health (it's essential before and after doing patch update), some info cannot be available in the availability group dashboard but you can get it though DMVs (as follows):



                            select db.name, 
                            db.database_id,
                            ag.name as GroupName,
                            state_desc,
                            recovery_model_desc,
                            log_reuse_wait_desc,
                            AGDB.truncation_lsn,
                            Rep.replica_server_name,
                            rep.endpoint_url,
                            DBRepStats.is_primary_replica,
                            DBRepStats.synchronization_health_desc,
                            DBRepStats.database_state_desc,
                            (redo_queue_size / 1024.0) as redo_queue_size_MB,
                            last_redone_time,
                            last_redone_lsn,
                            DBRepStats.end_of_log_lsn,
                            DBRepStats.last_sent_lsn,
                            DBRepStats.last_sent_time,
                            DBRepStats.last_received_lsn,
                            DBRepStats.last_received_time,
                            DBRepStats.last_hardened_lsn,
                            DBRepStats.last_hardened_time
                            from sys.databases as db
                            left outer join sys.availability_databases_cluster as AGDB on db.group_database_id = AGDB.group_database_id
                            left outer join sys.dm_hadr_database_replica_states as DBRepStats on db.group_database_id = DBRepStats.group_database_id
                            left outer join sys.availability_replicas as Rep on DBRepStats.group_id = Rep.group_id and DBRepStats.replica_id = Rep.replica_id
                            left outer join sys.availability_groups as AG on DBRepStats.group_id = AG.group_id
                            where db.database_id > 4






                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 7 hours ago









                            Shekar KolaShekar Kola

                            7021 silver badge13 bronze badges




                            7021 silver badge13 bronze badges































                                draft saved

                                draft discarded















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f248866%2fsql-server-always-on-availability-groups-patching%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

                                Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

                                19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу