What kind of action are dodge and disengage?Two-Weapon Fighting & Bonus Action in 5eCan a Beastmaster Ranger riding his Animal Companion take the Dash action every turn in addition to his action?When do you receive a bonus action and reaction?“Ready” and “Reaction” and “Uncanny Dodge”How does the disengage action work against a monster with the reactive heads ability, such as a hydra?What is the correct way to use Disengage or Dash as a bonus action?Can a character react to an action and take a regular action in the same round?Can you ready actions?What are the basic limitations for using a Reaction to move? Does movement used on your Turn matter?What can the 2019 UA Artificer's Alchemical Homunculus do outside of combat?

Why would someone open a Netflix account using my Gmail address?

Promotion comes with unexpected 24/7/365 on-call

Geometric inspiration behind Hal(irutan)'s Wolf(ram Language Logo)

Could there be something like aerobatic smoke trails in the vacuum of space?

Were any toxic metals used in the International Space Station?

Understanding Python syntax in lists vs series

Is my test coverage up to snuff?

Would life always name the light from their sun "white"

Meaning of "legitimate" in Carl Jung's quote "Neurosis is always a substitute for legitimate suffering."

How would you translate "grit" (personality trait) to Chinese?

Why are goodwill impairments on the statement of cash-flows of GE?

Why did the metro bus stop at each railway crossing, despite no warning indicating a train was coming?

Should I communicate in my applications that I'm unemployed out of choice rather than because nobody will have me?

Were any of the books mentioned in this scene from the movie Hackers real?

How to handle professionally if colleagues has referred his relative and asking to take easy while taking interview

How does a permutation act on a string?

Which creature is depicted in this Xanathar's Guide illustration of a war mage?

Why is the marginal distribution/marginal probability described as "marginal"?

What color to choose as "danger" if the main color of my app is red

Why is Drogon so much better in battle than Rhaegal and Viserion?

Why are lawsuits between the President and Congress not automatically sent to the Supreme Court

​Cuban​ ​Primes

Why did Varys remove his rings?

Does it matter what way the tires go if no directional arrow?



What kind of action are dodge and disengage?


Two-Weapon Fighting & Bonus Action in 5eCan a Beastmaster Ranger riding his Animal Companion take the Dash action every turn in addition to his action?When do you receive a bonus action and reaction?“Ready” and “Reaction” and “Uncanny Dodge”How does the disengage action work against a monster with the reactive heads ability, such as a hydra?What is the correct way to use Disengage or Dash as a bonus action?Can a character react to an action and take a regular action in the same round?Can you ready actions?What are the basic limitations for using a Reaction to move? Does movement used on your Turn matter?What can the 2019 UA Artificer's Alchemical Homunculus do outside of combat?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


Question about Actions vs Bonus Actions, vs Reactions:



In a game I was DMing recently (5e), the cleric had 2 ghouls on him. He took his reaction to dodge the attacks of the ghouls, and on his turn he took his action to try to use turn undead, then used his bonus action to dash from the ghouls. If he was able to do this, that was some pretty smart use of all of his actions, but I thought it seemed like using a reaction to keep dodging every attack that comes near you would make you really strong in combat.



Can you can even use disengage as a bonus action, or maybe even dodge?



From what I've read you could only use Dodge or Disengage as an action, unless you had some class feature that worked otherwise. He argues, though, that dodging is a bonus action, and thus he is able to do it.



Sorry that there's a lot to cover, but anything would really help me with this before my next game comes up.










share|improve this question









New contributor



N4V3H3114 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Just to be extra clear, when you say "dodge" in the question you are referring to the Dodge action, correct? Did they ever say how they were doing that as a reaction?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What level and domain is this Cleric? Have they possibly multiclassed into Rogue? And how did they "dodge" on their reaction?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also, what race is the Cleric?
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    2 hours ago

















1












$begingroup$


Question about Actions vs Bonus Actions, vs Reactions:



In a game I was DMing recently (5e), the cleric had 2 ghouls on him. He took his reaction to dodge the attacks of the ghouls, and on his turn he took his action to try to use turn undead, then used his bonus action to dash from the ghouls. If he was able to do this, that was some pretty smart use of all of his actions, but I thought it seemed like using a reaction to keep dodging every attack that comes near you would make you really strong in combat.



Can you can even use disengage as a bonus action, or maybe even dodge?



From what I've read you could only use Dodge or Disengage as an action, unless you had some class feature that worked otherwise. He argues, though, that dodging is a bonus action, and thus he is able to do it.



Sorry that there's a lot to cover, but anything would really help me with this before my next game comes up.










share|improve this question









New contributor



N4V3H3114 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Just to be extra clear, when you say "dodge" in the question you are referring to the Dodge action, correct? Did they ever say how they were doing that as a reaction?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What level and domain is this Cleric? Have they possibly multiclassed into Rogue? And how did they "dodge" on their reaction?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also, what race is the Cleric?
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    2 hours ago













1












1








1





$begingroup$


Question about Actions vs Bonus Actions, vs Reactions:



In a game I was DMing recently (5e), the cleric had 2 ghouls on him. He took his reaction to dodge the attacks of the ghouls, and on his turn he took his action to try to use turn undead, then used his bonus action to dash from the ghouls. If he was able to do this, that was some pretty smart use of all of his actions, but I thought it seemed like using a reaction to keep dodging every attack that comes near you would make you really strong in combat.



Can you can even use disengage as a bonus action, or maybe even dodge?



From what I've read you could only use Dodge or Disengage as an action, unless you had some class feature that worked otherwise. He argues, though, that dodging is a bonus action, and thus he is able to do it.



Sorry that there's a lot to cover, but anything would really help me with this before my next game comes up.










share|improve this question









New contributor



N4V3H3114 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






$endgroup$




Question about Actions vs Bonus Actions, vs Reactions:



In a game I was DMing recently (5e), the cleric had 2 ghouls on him. He took his reaction to dodge the attacks of the ghouls, and on his turn he took his action to try to use turn undead, then used his bonus action to dash from the ghouls. If he was able to do this, that was some pretty smart use of all of his actions, but I thought it seemed like using a reaction to keep dodging every attack that comes near you would make you really strong in combat.



Can you can even use disengage as a bonus action, or maybe even dodge?



From what I've read you could only use Dodge or Disengage as an action, unless you had some class feature that worked otherwise. He argues, though, that dodging is a bonus action, and thus he is able to do it.



Sorry that there's a lot to cover, but anything would really help me with this before my next game comes up.







dnd-5e actions






share|improve this question









New contributor



N4V3H3114 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










share|improve this question









New contributor



N4V3H3114 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









V2Blast

29.1k5105177




29.1k5105177






New contributor



N4V3H3114 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








asked 2 hours ago









N4V3H3114N4V3H3114

91




91




New contributor



N4V3H3114 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




N4V3H3114 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Just to be extra clear, when you say "dodge" in the question you are referring to the Dodge action, correct? Did they ever say how they were doing that as a reaction?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What level and domain is this Cleric? Have they possibly multiclassed into Rogue? And how did they "dodge" on their reaction?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also, what race is the Cleric?
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    2 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Just to be extra clear, when you say "dodge" in the question you are referring to the Dodge action, correct? Did they ever say how they were doing that as a reaction?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 hours ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What level and domain is this Cleric? Have they possibly multiclassed into Rogue? And how did they "dodge" on their reaction?
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    2 hours ago






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also, what race is the Cleric?
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    2 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
Just to be extra clear, when you say "dodge" in the question you are referring to the Dodge action, correct? Did they ever say how they were doing that as a reaction?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 hours ago





$begingroup$
Just to be extra clear, when you say "dodge" in the question you are referring to the Dodge action, correct? Did they ever say how they were doing that as a reaction?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 hours ago





1




1




$begingroup$
What level and domain is this Cleric? Have they possibly multiclassed into Rogue? And how did they "dodge" on their reaction?
$endgroup$
– linksassin
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
What level and domain is this Cleric? Have they possibly multiclassed into Rogue? And how did they "dodge" on their reaction?
$endgroup$
– linksassin
2 hours ago




3




3




$begingroup$
Also, what race is the Cleric?
$endgroup$
– Miniman
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
Also, what race is the Cleric?
$endgroup$
– Miniman
2 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5












$begingroup$

The Dodge and Disengage actions are primarily considered as an option to take as your primary Action (PHB p.192):




Dodge



When you take the Dodge action, you focus entirely on avoiding attacks. Until the start of your next turn, any attack roll made against you has disadvantage if you can see the attacker, and you make Dexterity saving throws with advantage.



Disengage



If you take the Disengage action, your movement doesn't provoke opportunity attacks for the rest of the turn.




There are some classes however, that allow you to "Dodge", but these class features aren't the same as the Dodge action. For example, the Rogue's Uncanny Dodge feature halves damage, as a reaction (PHB p.96):




Starting at 5th level, when an attacker that you can see hits you with an attack, you can use your reaction to halve the attack's damage against you.




The Monk does gain a feature to allow them to Dodge as a bonus action, at the cost of a Ki Point (PHB p.78):




Patient Defense



You can spend 1 ki point to take the Dodge action as a bonus action on your turn




And then a feature similar to the Rogue's Uncanny Dodge (PHB p.78):




Starting at 3rd level, you can use your reaction to deflect or catch the missile when you are hit by a ranged weapon attack.




Outside of this, there is very little that allows a player to make these actions as a reaction, or a bonus action.



The only other suggestion I might make is that Matt Mercer's Critical Role series allowed players to use their Bonus Action as "another Action", to basically make things more cinematic. This was generally a spur of the moment decision to keep things moving, rather than to stop the game and check the rules, however.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also Mercer did not allow player to "use their Bonus Action as 'another Action'". He just rolls with "rules of cool" a lot and doesn't take awesome moments away from players on technicalities. He sometimes lets it slide if they didn't do a lot with their turn anyway. But most of the time he will enforce it.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    1 hour ago


















2












$begingroup$

Let's refer to this handy chart.



Dash (PHB 192), Disengage (PHB 192), Dodge (PHB 192), Ready (PHB 193), and Cast a Spell (PHB 192) are all Actions. You get to use one of those per turn during ordinary cases. Note that Turn Undead is an Action.



The only Reactions possible are an Opportunity Attack (PHB 195), a Readied Action (PHB 193, must have used Ready on their most recent turn), or a Cast (PHB 192) spell that has a casting time of a Reaction. You get at most one of these a round (so, it is refreshed only when their initiative comes up).



Bonus Actions can be an Offhand Attack (PHB 192,194-195), when using the Two-Weapon Fighting rule, a Cast (PHB 192) spell that has a casting time of one Bonus Action, or a Class Feature (PHB, see specific Class Features) with a time of Bonus Action. You get one Bonus Action per turn.



So, given this information, it appears that your intrepid Cleric took three Actions in a single turn. Short of any Class Feature or Racial Feature that might provide an explanation for this, this was definitely an abuse of the action economy.



To be sure though, check to see if they're using a particular Race, Feat, or Class Feature that might have allowed this action economy. I'm not aware of any such items that would match this, since action economy is tightly regulated to avoid the sort of balance problems you witnessed in that encounter.



The Cleric could probably still have won, but it would be a lot more challenging. Turn Undead on one, hopefully kill the other within 10 rounds, do some healing, if possible, then deal with the other. Or, use every single Action to Dash in the opposite direction to safety, whatever that might mean.



It'd be worth your time to reread the rules and refresh your memory, and maybe even find a handy chart like the one I've linked for moments like this. Also, whenever a player does something that seems genuinely Too Good To Be True, it never hurts to double-check the rules, just in case.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To be pedantic, there's no such thing in the 5e rules as an "offhand attack". The feature that part of the chart's referring to is the bonus-action attack from the Two-Weapon Fighting rule: dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/combat#TwoWeaponFighting
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    59 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast True enough. It doesn't materially affect this answer, but it's good to be technically correct. I'll edit.
    $endgroup$
    – phyrfox
    33 mins ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






N4V3H3114 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148059%2fwhat-kind-of-action-are-dodge-and-disengage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5












$begingroup$

The Dodge and Disengage actions are primarily considered as an option to take as your primary Action (PHB p.192):




Dodge



When you take the Dodge action, you focus entirely on avoiding attacks. Until the start of your next turn, any attack roll made against you has disadvantage if you can see the attacker, and you make Dexterity saving throws with advantage.



Disengage



If you take the Disengage action, your movement doesn't provoke opportunity attacks for the rest of the turn.




There are some classes however, that allow you to "Dodge", but these class features aren't the same as the Dodge action. For example, the Rogue's Uncanny Dodge feature halves damage, as a reaction (PHB p.96):




Starting at 5th level, when an attacker that you can see hits you with an attack, you can use your reaction to halve the attack's damage against you.




The Monk does gain a feature to allow them to Dodge as a bonus action, at the cost of a Ki Point (PHB p.78):




Patient Defense



You can spend 1 ki point to take the Dodge action as a bonus action on your turn




And then a feature similar to the Rogue's Uncanny Dodge (PHB p.78):




Starting at 3rd level, you can use your reaction to deflect or catch the missile when you are hit by a ranged weapon attack.




Outside of this, there is very little that allows a player to make these actions as a reaction, or a bonus action.



The only other suggestion I might make is that Matt Mercer's Critical Role series allowed players to use their Bonus Action as "another Action", to basically make things more cinematic. This was generally a spur of the moment decision to keep things moving, rather than to stop the game and check the rules, however.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also Mercer did not allow player to "use their Bonus Action as 'another Action'". He just rolls with "rules of cool" a lot and doesn't take awesome moments away from players on technicalities. He sometimes lets it slide if they didn't do a lot with their turn anyway. But most of the time he will enforce it.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    1 hour ago















5












$begingroup$

The Dodge and Disengage actions are primarily considered as an option to take as your primary Action (PHB p.192):




Dodge



When you take the Dodge action, you focus entirely on avoiding attacks. Until the start of your next turn, any attack roll made against you has disadvantage if you can see the attacker, and you make Dexterity saving throws with advantage.



Disengage



If you take the Disengage action, your movement doesn't provoke opportunity attacks for the rest of the turn.




There are some classes however, that allow you to "Dodge", but these class features aren't the same as the Dodge action. For example, the Rogue's Uncanny Dodge feature halves damage, as a reaction (PHB p.96):




Starting at 5th level, when an attacker that you can see hits you with an attack, you can use your reaction to halve the attack's damage against you.




The Monk does gain a feature to allow them to Dodge as a bonus action, at the cost of a Ki Point (PHB p.78):




Patient Defense



You can spend 1 ki point to take the Dodge action as a bonus action on your turn




And then a feature similar to the Rogue's Uncanny Dodge (PHB p.78):




Starting at 3rd level, you can use your reaction to deflect or catch the missile when you are hit by a ranged weapon attack.




Outside of this, there is very little that allows a player to make these actions as a reaction, or a bonus action.



The only other suggestion I might make is that Matt Mercer's Critical Role series allowed players to use their Bonus Action as "another Action", to basically make things more cinematic. This was generally a spur of the moment decision to keep things moving, rather than to stop the game and check the rules, however.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also Mercer did not allow player to "use their Bonus Action as 'another Action'". He just rolls with "rules of cool" a lot and doesn't take awesome moments away from players on technicalities. He sometimes lets it slide if they didn't do a lot with their turn anyway. But most of the time he will enforce it.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    1 hour ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$

The Dodge and Disengage actions are primarily considered as an option to take as your primary Action (PHB p.192):




Dodge



When you take the Dodge action, you focus entirely on avoiding attacks. Until the start of your next turn, any attack roll made against you has disadvantage if you can see the attacker, and you make Dexterity saving throws with advantage.



Disengage



If you take the Disengage action, your movement doesn't provoke opportunity attacks for the rest of the turn.




There are some classes however, that allow you to "Dodge", but these class features aren't the same as the Dodge action. For example, the Rogue's Uncanny Dodge feature halves damage, as a reaction (PHB p.96):




Starting at 5th level, when an attacker that you can see hits you with an attack, you can use your reaction to halve the attack's damage against you.




The Monk does gain a feature to allow them to Dodge as a bonus action, at the cost of a Ki Point (PHB p.78):




Patient Defense



You can spend 1 ki point to take the Dodge action as a bonus action on your turn




And then a feature similar to the Rogue's Uncanny Dodge (PHB p.78):




Starting at 3rd level, you can use your reaction to deflect or catch the missile when you are hit by a ranged weapon attack.




Outside of this, there is very little that allows a player to make these actions as a reaction, or a bonus action.



The only other suggestion I might make is that Matt Mercer's Critical Role series allowed players to use their Bonus Action as "another Action", to basically make things more cinematic. This was generally a spur of the moment decision to keep things moving, rather than to stop the game and check the rules, however.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The Dodge and Disengage actions are primarily considered as an option to take as your primary Action (PHB p.192):




Dodge



When you take the Dodge action, you focus entirely on avoiding attacks. Until the start of your next turn, any attack roll made against you has disadvantage if you can see the attacker, and you make Dexterity saving throws with advantage.



Disengage



If you take the Disengage action, your movement doesn't provoke opportunity attacks for the rest of the turn.




There are some classes however, that allow you to "Dodge", but these class features aren't the same as the Dodge action. For example, the Rogue's Uncanny Dodge feature halves damage, as a reaction (PHB p.96):




Starting at 5th level, when an attacker that you can see hits you with an attack, you can use your reaction to halve the attack's damage against you.




The Monk does gain a feature to allow them to Dodge as a bonus action, at the cost of a Ki Point (PHB p.78):




Patient Defense



You can spend 1 ki point to take the Dodge action as a bonus action on your turn




And then a feature similar to the Rogue's Uncanny Dodge (PHB p.78):




Starting at 3rd level, you can use your reaction to deflect or catch the missile when you are hit by a ranged weapon attack.




Outside of this, there is very little that allows a player to make these actions as a reaction, or a bonus action.



The only other suggestion I might make is that Matt Mercer's Critical Role series allowed players to use their Bonus Action as "another Action", to basically make things more cinematic. This was generally a spur of the moment decision to keep things moving, rather than to stop the game and check the rules, however.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago









V2Blast

29.1k5105177




29.1k5105177










answered 1 hour ago









BenBen

11.5k1569142




11.5k1569142







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also Mercer did not allow player to "use their Bonus Action as 'another Action'". He just rolls with "rules of cool" a lot and doesn't take awesome moments away from players on technicalities. He sometimes lets it slide if they didn't do a lot with their turn anyway. But most of the time he will enforce it.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    1 hour ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Also Mercer did not allow player to "use their Bonus Action as 'another Action'". He just rolls with "rules of cool" a lot and doesn't take awesome moments away from players on technicalities. He sometimes lets it slide if they didn't do a lot with their turn anyway. But most of the time he will enforce it.
    $endgroup$
    – linksassin
    1 hour ago







3




3




$begingroup$
Also Mercer did not allow player to "use their Bonus Action as 'another Action'". He just rolls with "rules of cool" a lot and doesn't take awesome moments away from players on technicalities. He sometimes lets it slide if they didn't do a lot with their turn anyway. But most of the time he will enforce it.
$endgroup$
– linksassin
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Also Mercer did not allow player to "use their Bonus Action as 'another Action'". He just rolls with "rules of cool" a lot and doesn't take awesome moments away from players on technicalities. He sometimes lets it slide if they didn't do a lot with their turn anyway. But most of the time he will enforce it.
$endgroup$
– linksassin
1 hour ago













2












$begingroup$

Let's refer to this handy chart.



Dash (PHB 192), Disengage (PHB 192), Dodge (PHB 192), Ready (PHB 193), and Cast a Spell (PHB 192) are all Actions. You get to use one of those per turn during ordinary cases. Note that Turn Undead is an Action.



The only Reactions possible are an Opportunity Attack (PHB 195), a Readied Action (PHB 193, must have used Ready on their most recent turn), or a Cast (PHB 192) spell that has a casting time of a Reaction. You get at most one of these a round (so, it is refreshed only when their initiative comes up).



Bonus Actions can be an Offhand Attack (PHB 192,194-195), when using the Two-Weapon Fighting rule, a Cast (PHB 192) spell that has a casting time of one Bonus Action, or a Class Feature (PHB, see specific Class Features) with a time of Bonus Action. You get one Bonus Action per turn.



So, given this information, it appears that your intrepid Cleric took three Actions in a single turn. Short of any Class Feature or Racial Feature that might provide an explanation for this, this was definitely an abuse of the action economy.



To be sure though, check to see if they're using a particular Race, Feat, or Class Feature that might have allowed this action economy. I'm not aware of any such items that would match this, since action economy is tightly regulated to avoid the sort of balance problems you witnessed in that encounter.



The Cleric could probably still have won, but it would be a lot more challenging. Turn Undead on one, hopefully kill the other within 10 rounds, do some healing, if possible, then deal with the other. Or, use every single Action to Dash in the opposite direction to safety, whatever that might mean.



It'd be worth your time to reread the rules and refresh your memory, and maybe even find a handy chart like the one I've linked for moments like this. Also, whenever a player does something that seems genuinely Too Good To Be True, it never hurts to double-check the rules, just in case.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To be pedantic, there's no such thing in the 5e rules as an "offhand attack". The feature that part of the chart's referring to is the bonus-action attack from the Two-Weapon Fighting rule: dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/combat#TwoWeaponFighting
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    59 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast True enough. It doesn't materially affect this answer, but it's good to be technically correct. I'll edit.
    $endgroup$
    – phyrfox
    33 mins ago















2












$begingroup$

Let's refer to this handy chart.



Dash (PHB 192), Disengage (PHB 192), Dodge (PHB 192), Ready (PHB 193), and Cast a Spell (PHB 192) are all Actions. You get to use one of those per turn during ordinary cases. Note that Turn Undead is an Action.



The only Reactions possible are an Opportunity Attack (PHB 195), a Readied Action (PHB 193, must have used Ready on their most recent turn), or a Cast (PHB 192) spell that has a casting time of a Reaction. You get at most one of these a round (so, it is refreshed only when their initiative comes up).



Bonus Actions can be an Offhand Attack (PHB 192,194-195), when using the Two-Weapon Fighting rule, a Cast (PHB 192) spell that has a casting time of one Bonus Action, or a Class Feature (PHB, see specific Class Features) with a time of Bonus Action. You get one Bonus Action per turn.



So, given this information, it appears that your intrepid Cleric took three Actions in a single turn. Short of any Class Feature or Racial Feature that might provide an explanation for this, this was definitely an abuse of the action economy.



To be sure though, check to see if they're using a particular Race, Feat, or Class Feature that might have allowed this action economy. I'm not aware of any such items that would match this, since action economy is tightly regulated to avoid the sort of balance problems you witnessed in that encounter.



The Cleric could probably still have won, but it would be a lot more challenging. Turn Undead on one, hopefully kill the other within 10 rounds, do some healing, if possible, then deal with the other. Or, use every single Action to Dash in the opposite direction to safety, whatever that might mean.



It'd be worth your time to reread the rules and refresh your memory, and maybe even find a handy chart like the one I've linked for moments like this. Also, whenever a player does something that seems genuinely Too Good To Be True, it never hurts to double-check the rules, just in case.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To be pedantic, there's no such thing in the 5e rules as an "offhand attack". The feature that part of the chart's referring to is the bonus-action attack from the Two-Weapon Fighting rule: dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/combat#TwoWeaponFighting
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    59 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast True enough. It doesn't materially affect this answer, but it's good to be technically correct. I'll edit.
    $endgroup$
    – phyrfox
    33 mins ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

Let's refer to this handy chart.



Dash (PHB 192), Disengage (PHB 192), Dodge (PHB 192), Ready (PHB 193), and Cast a Spell (PHB 192) are all Actions. You get to use one of those per turn during ordinary cases. Note that Turn Undead is an Action.



The only Reactions possible are an Opportunity Attack (PHB 195), a Readied Action (PHB 193, must have used Ready on their most recent turn), or a Cast (PHB 192) spell that has a casting time of a Reaction. You get at most one of these a round (so, it is refreshed only when their initiative comes up).



Bonus Actions can be an Offhand Attack (PHB 192,194-195), when using the Two-Weapon Fighting rule, a Cast (PHB 192) spell that has a casting time of one Bonus Action, or a Class Feature (PHB, see specific Class Features) with a time of Bonus Action. You get one Bonus Action per turn.



So, given this information, it appears that your intrepid Cleric took three Actions in a single turn. Short of any Class Feature or Racial Feature that might provide an explanation for this, this was definitely an abuse of the action economy.



To be sure though, check to see if they're using a particular Race, Feat, or Class Feature that might have allowed this action economy. I'm not aware of any such items that would match this, since action economy is tightly regulated to avoid the sort of balance problems you witnessed in that encounter.



The Cleric could probably still have won, but it would be a lot more challenging. Turn Undead on one, hopefully kill the other within 10 rounds, do some healing, if possible, then deal with the other. Or, use every single Action to Dash in the opposite direction to safety, whatever that might mean.



It'd be worth your time to reread the rules and refresh your memory, and maybe even find a handy chart like the one I've linked for moments like this. Also, whenever a player does something that seems genuinely Too Good To Be True, it never hurts to double-check the rules, just in case.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Let's refer to this handy chart.



Dash (PHB 192), Disengage (PHB 192), Dodge (PHB 192), Ready (PHB 193), and Cast a Spell (PHB 192) are all Actions. You get to use one of those per turn during ordinary cases. Note that Turn Undead is an Action.



The only Reactions possible are an Opportunity Attack (PHB 195), a Readied Action (PHB 193, must have used Ready on their most recent turn), or a Cast (PHB 192) spell that has a casting time of a Reaction. You get at most one of these a round (so, it is refreshed only when their initiative comes up).



Bonus Actions can be an Offhand Attack (PHB 192,194-195), when using the Two-Weapon Fighting rule, a Cast (PHB 192) spell that has a casting time of one Bonus Action, or a Class Feature (PHB, see specific Class Features) with a time of Bonus Action. You get one Bonus Action per turn.



So, given this information, it appears that your intrepid Cleric took three Actions in a single turn. Short of any Class Feature or Racial Feature that might provide an explanation for this, this was definitely an abuse of the action economy.



To be sure though, check to see if they're using a particular Race, Feat, or Class Feature that might have allowed this action economy. I'm not aware of any such items that would match this, since action economy is tightly regulated to avoid the sort of balance problems you witnessed in that encounter.



The Cleric could probably still have won, but it would be a lot more challenging. Turn Undead on one, hopefully kill the other within 10 rounds, do some healing, if possible, then deal with the other. Or, use every single Action to Dash in the opposite direction to safety, whatever that might mean.



It'd be worth your time to reread the rules and refresh your memory, and maybe even find a handy chart like the one I've linked for moments like this. Also, whenever a player does something that seems genuinely Too Good To Be True, it never hurts to double-check the rules, just in case.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 30 mins ago









V2Blast

29.1k5105177




29.1k5105177










answered 1 hour ago









phyrfoxphyrfox

1,04669




1,04669







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To be pedantic, there's no such thing in the 5e rules as an "offhand attack". The feature that part of the chart's referring to is the bonus-action attack from the Two-Weapon Fighting rule: dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/combat#TwoWeaponFighting
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    59 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast True enough. It doesn't materially affect this answer, but it's good to be technically correct. I'll edit.
    $endgroup$
    – phyrfox
    33 mins ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    To be pedantic, there's no such thing in the 5e rules as an "offhand attack". The feature that part of the chart's referring to is the bonus-action attack from the Two-Weapon Fighting rule: dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/combat#TwoWeaponFighting
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    59 mins ago











  • $begingroup$
    @V2Blast True enough. It doesn't materially affect this answer, but it's good to be technically correct. I'll edit.
    $endgroup$
    – phyrfox
    33 mins ago







1




1




$begingroup$
To be pedantic, there's no such thing in the 5e rules as an "offhand attack". The feature that part of the chart's referring to is the bonus-action attack from the Two-Weapon Fighting rule: dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/combat#TwoWeaponFighting
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
59 mins ago





$begingroup$
To be pedantic, there's no such thing in the 5e rules as an "offhand attack". The feature that part of the chart's referring to is the bonus-action attack from the Two-Weapon Fighting rule: dndbeyond.com/sources/basic-rules/combat#TwoWeaponFighting
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
59 mins ago













$begingroup$
@V2Blast True enough. It doesn't materially affect this answer, but it's good to be technically correct. I'll edit.
$endgroup$
– phyrfox
33 mins ago




$begingroup$
@V2Blast True enough. It doesn't materially affect this answer, but it's good to be technically correct. I'll edit.
$endgroup$
– phyrfox
33 mins ago










N4V3H3114 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















N4V3H3114 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












N4V3H3114 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











N4V3H3114 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148059%2fwhat-kind-of-action-are-dodge-and-disengage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу