Reverse dots and boxes, swastika editionWhat is the name of this line-connecting game?Optimal play for 2 by 2 dots and boxesWhat's a good Boxes Strategy?Name of dots and lines gamePlacing dominoes on a 3x100 checkerboardSquic Squac SquoOct - Dots and Boxes on Steroids!A Tic-Tac-Toe variant with three marks - winning strategy and chancesPaper, pencil and a bunch of barsReverse dots and boxes
Managing and organizing the massively increased number of classes after switching to SOLID?
Why are they 'nude photos'?
What steps should I take to lawfully visit the United States as a tourist immediately after visiting on a B-1 visa?
Do you know your 'KVZ's?
Storming Area 51
Is Trump personally blocking people on Twitter?
Optimization terminology: "Exact" v. "Approximate"
Keep milk (or milk alternative) for a day without a fridge
How can one write good dialogue in a story without sounding wooden?
Is "I do not want you to go nowhere" a case of "DOUBLE-NEGATIVES" as claimed by Grammarly?
Why isn't there research to build a standard lunar, or Martian mobility platform?
Are randomly-generated passwords starting with "a" less secure?
Reverse dots and boxes, swastika edition
How to tell someone I'd like to become friends without letting them think I'm romantically interested in them?
How did the hit man miss?
How were Martello towers supposed to work?
Integer Lists of Noah
Misspelling my name on my mathematical publications
What is a solution?
Terry Pratchett book with a lawyer dragon and sheep
Are neural networks prone to catastrophic forgetting?
How would my creatures handle groups without a strong concept of numbers?
When casting Eldritch Blast with the Agonizing Blast eldritch invocation, what do I add to my damage roll?
Single word for "refusing to move to next activity unless present one is completed."
Reverse dots and boxes, swastika edition
What is the name of this line-connecting game?Optimal play for 2 by 2 dots and boxesWhat's a good Boxes Strategy?Name of dots and lines gamePlacing dominoes on a 3x100 checkerboardSquic Squac SquoOct - Dots and Boxes on Steroids!A Tic-Tac-Toe variant with three marks - winning strategy and chancesPaper, pencil and a bunch of barsReverse dots and boxes
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Alistair and Roberta are playing a game of reverse dots and boxes.
- The players take turns adding one horizontal or vertical line in one free spot on the grid (marked with light gray lines in the below image). Alistair goes first.
- If a move completes a $1times1$ box, the player gets one point and has to make another move. If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move. The player keeps making moves until they make a move which does not complete a $1times1$ box.
- The game ends when all possible lines have been drawn.
- Since this is a reverse game, the player with the most points loses.
Which of the players can win the game played in the above grid? What strategy should they use?
strategy game game-theory pencil-and-paper-games dots-and-boxes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alistair and Roberta are playing a game of reverse dots and boxes.
- The players take turns adding one horizontal or vertical line in one free spot on the grid (marked with light gray lines in the below image). Alistair goes first.
- If a move completes a $1times1$ box, the player gets one point and has to make another move. If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move. The player keeps making moves until they make a move which does not complete a $1times1$ box.
- The game ends when all possible lines have been drawn.
- Since this is a reverse game, the player with the most points loses.
Which of the players can win the game played in the above grid? What strategy should they use?
strategy game game-theory pencil-and-paper-games dots-and-boxes
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Alistair and Roberta are playing a game of reverse dots and boxes.
- The players take turns adding one horizontal or vertical line in one free spot on the grid (marked with light gray lines in the below image). Alistair goes first.
- If a move completes a $1times1$ box, the player gets one point and has to make another move. If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move. The player keeps making moves until they make a move which does not complete a $1times1$ box.
- The game ends when all possible lines have been drawn.
- Since this is a reverse game, the player with the most points loses.
Which of the players can win the game played in the above grid? What strategy should they use?
strategy game game-theory pencil-and-paper-games dots-and-boxes
$endgroup$
Alistair and Roberta are playing a game of reverse dots and boxes.
- The players take turns adding one horizontal or vertical line in one free spot on the grid (marked with light gray lines in the below image). Alistair goes first.
- If a move completes a $1times1$ box, the player gets one point and has to make another move. If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move. The player keeps making moves until they make a move which does not complete a $1times1$ box.
- The game ends when all possible lines have been drawn.
- Since this is a reverse game, the player with the most points loses.
Which of the players can win the game played in the above grid? What strategy should they use?
strategy game game-theory pencil-and-paper-games dots-and-boxes
strategy game game-theory pencil-and-paper-games dots-and-boxes
asked 9 hours ago
jafejafe
32.5k5 gold badges89 silver badges329 bronze badges
32.5k5 gold badges89 silver badges329 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First player wins
Capture two squares from three of the four wings, then cut off the last wing. Player two can no longer make any moves that don't result in a capture.
This wins, 6-7.
Example:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yep, you are right.
$endgroup$
– user3294068
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Found the same, but with the last move one square to the left. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Bass
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is wrong: the second player will necessarily finish two squares simultaneously and hence have only one more move after that, so they won't get 7 points in the end.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ArnaudMortier can you provide an example? I can't find a move that can be made that won't complete a box
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I quote the OP: If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Second player wins.
First player's first move, assuming they don't take any squares, can only be to split an arm with two on the end or cut off an arm, taking one of the sides on the middle square.
After that,
If first player split an arm, second player cuts off that arm, taking one square. If first player cut off an arm, second player ignores it. Now the center square has one edge filled.
Then,
Second player takes an entire arm. That leaves the center with two edges marked. There are no more branches, just a chain of 2 or 3, and a chain of 7. Second player reduces the chain of 7 by taking the end of an untouched arm. Now there's a chain of 6. They split that in two.
On first player's second turn,
They face chains of length 2,3,3 or 3,3,3. Either way, every move they take completes a square, so they take all remaining squares.
In the end,
The second player has taken 4 or 5 squares, and first player has taken 8 or 9.
Alternately,
First player can force the second player to end the game on their turn. They take two entire arms and take the end of one arm, leaving a single chain of 6. They then split that chain in half, leaving the second player with chains of length 3,3. Second player must then take all the rest. First player still loses with 7 squares to second player's 6. But this strategy allows them to lose by the least amount.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f86066%2freverse-dots-and-boxes-swastika-edition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
First player wins
Capture two squares from three of the four wings, then cut off the last wing. Player two can no longer make any moves that don't result in a capture.
This wins, 6-7.
Example:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yep, you are right.
$endgroup$
– user3294068
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Found the same, but with the last move one square to the left. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Bass
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is wrong: the second player will necessarily finish two squares simultaneously and hence have only one more move after that, so they won't get 7 points in the end.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ArnaudMortier can you provide an example? I can't find a move that can be made that won't complete a box
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I quote the OP: If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
First player wins
Capture two squares from three of the four wings, then cut off the last wing. Player two can no longer make any moves that don't result in a capture.
This wins, 6-7.
Example:
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yep, you are right.
$endgroup$
– user3294068
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Found the same, but with the last move one square to the left. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Bass
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is wrong: the second player will necessarily finish two squares simultaneously and hence have only one more move after that, so they won't get 7 points in the end.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ArnaudMortier can you provide an example? I can't find a move that can be made that won't complete a box
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I quote the OP: If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
First player wins
Capture two squares from three of the four wings, then cut off the last wing. Player two can no longer make any moves that don't result in a capture.
This wins, 6-7.
Example:
$endgroup$
First player wins
Capture two squares from three of the four wings, then cut off the last wing. Player two can no longer make any moves that don't result in a capture.
This wins, 6-7.
Example:
answered 8 hours ago
SconibulusSconibulus
15.2k1 gold badge29 silver badges103 bronze badges
15.2k1 gold badge29 silver badges103 bronze badges
$begingroup$
Yep, you are right.
$endgroup$
– user3294068
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Found the same, but with the last move one square to the left. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Bass
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is wrong: the second player will necessarily finish two squares simultaneously and hence have only one more move after that, so they won't get 7 points in the end.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ArnaudMortier can you provide an example? I can't find a move that can be made that won't complete a box
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I quote the OP: If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Yep, you are right.
$endgroup$
– user3294068
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Found the same, but with the last move one square to the left. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Bass
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is wrong: the second player will necessarily finish two squares simultaneously and hence have only one more move after that, so they won't get 7 points in the end.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ArnaudMortier can you provide an example? I can't find a move that can be made that won't complete a box
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I quote the OP: If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yep, you are right.
$endgroup$
– user3294068
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Yep, you are right.
$endgroup$
– user3294068
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Found the same, but with the last move one square to the left. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Bass
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
Found the same, but with the last move one square to the left. Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Bass
8 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is wrong: the second player will necessarily finish two squares simultaneously and hence have only one more move after that, so they won't get 7 points in the end.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
This is wrong: the second player will necessarily finish two squares simultaneously and hence have only one more move after that, so they won't get 7 points in the end.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ArnaudMortier can you provide an example? I can't find a move that can be made that won't complete a box
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
@ArnaudMortier can you provide an example? I can't find a move that can be made that won't complete a box
$endgroup$
– Sconibulus
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I quote the OP: If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
$begingroup$
I quote the OP: If two boxes are completed with a single move, the player gets two points but only has to make one additional move.
$endgroup$
– Arnaud Mortier
7 hours ago
|
show 4 more comments
$begingroup$
Second player wins.
First player's first move, assuming they don't take any squares, can only be to split an arm with two on the end or cut off an arm, taking one of the sides on the middle square.
After that,
If first player split an arm, second player cuts off that arm, taking one square. If first player cut off an arm, second player ignores it. Now the center square has one edge filled.
Then,
Second player takes an entire arm. That leaves the center with two edges marked. There are no more branches, just a chain of 2 or 3, and a chain of 7. Second player reduces the chain of 7 by taking the end of an untouched arm. Now there's a chain of 6. They split that in two.
On first player's second turn,
They face chains of length 2,3,3 or 3,3,3. Either way, every move they take completes a square, so they take all remaining squares.
In the end,
The second player has taken 4 or 5 squares, and first player has taken 8 or 9.
Alternately,
First player can force the second player to end the game on their turn. They take two entire arms and take the end of one arm, leaving a single chain of 6. They then split that chain in half, leaving the second player with chains of length 3,3. Second player must then take all the rest. First player still loses with 7 squares to second player's 6. But this strategy allows them to lose by the least amount.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Second player wins.
First player's first move, assuming they don't take any squares, can only be to split an arm with two on the end or cut off an arm, taking one of the sides on the middle square.
After that,
If first player split an arm, second player cuts off that arm, taking one square. If first player cut off an arm, second player ignores it. Now the center square has one edge filled.
Then,
Second player takes an entire arm. That leaves the center with two edges marked. There are no more branches, just a chain of 2 or 3, and a chain of 7. Second player reduces the chain of 7 by taking the end of an untouched arm. Now there's a chain of 6. They split that in two.
On first player's second turn,
They face chains of length 2,3,3 or 3,3,3. Either way, every move they take completes a square, so they take all remaining squares.
In the end,
The second player has taken 4 or 5 squares, and first player has taken 8 or 9.
Alternately,
First player can force the second player to end the game on their turn. They take two entire arms and take the end of one arm, leaving a single chain of 6. They then split that chain in half, leaving the second player with chains of length 3,3. Second player must then take all the rest. First player still loses with 7 squares to second player's 6. But this strategy allows them to lose by the least amount.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Second player wins.
First player's first move, assuming they don't take any squares, can only be to split an arm with two on the end or cut off an arm, taking one of the sides on the middle square.
After that,
If first player split an arm, second player cuts off that arm, taking one square. If first player cut off an arm, second player ignores it. Now the center square has one edge filled.
Then,
Second player takes an entire arm. That leaves the center with two edges marked. There are no more branches, just a chain of 2 or 3, and a chain of 7. Second player reduces the chain of 7 by taking the end of an untouched arm. Now there's a chain of 6. They split that in two.
On first player's second turn,
They face chains of length 2,3,3 or 3,3,3. Either way, every move they take completes a square, so they take all remaining squares.
In the end,
The second player has taken 4 or 5 squares, and first player has taken 8 or 9.
Alternately,
First player can force the second player to end the game on their turn. They take two entire arms and take the end of one arm, leaving a single chain of 6. They then split that chain in half, leaving the second player with chains of length 3,3. Second player must then take all the rest. First player still loses with 7 squares to second player's 6. But this strategy allows them to lose by the least amount.
$endgroup$
Second player wins.
First player's first move, assuming they don't take any squares, can only be to split an arm with two on the end or cut off an arm, taking one of the sides on the middle square.
After that,
If first player split an arm, second player cuts off that arm, taking one square. If first player cut off an arm, second player ignores it. Now the center square has one edge filled.
Then,
Second player takes an entire arm. That leaves the center with two edges marked. There are no more branches, just a chain of 2 or 3, and a chain of 7. Second player reduces the chain of 7 by taking the end of an untouched arm. Now there's a chain of 6. They split that in two.
On first player's second turn,
They face chains of length 2,3,3 or 3,3,3. Either way, every move they take completes a square, so they take all remaining squares.
In the end,
The second player has taken 4 or 5 squares, and first player has taken 8 or 9.
Alternately,
First player can force the second player to end the game on their turn. They take two entire arms and take the end of one arm, leaving a single chain of 6. They then split that chain in half, leaving the second player with chains of length 3,3. Second player must then take all the rest. First player still loses with 7 squares to second player's 6. But this strategy allows them to lose by the least amount.
edited 8 hours ago
answered 8 hours ago
user3294068user3294068
5,97417 silver badges29 bronze badges
5,97417 silver badges29 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f86066%2freverse-dots-and-boxes-swastika-edition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown