Variation in the spelling of word-final MThe Latin word “Have” rather than “Ave” as a translation of the Greek word Χαῖρε?Were there informal spelling variants in classical Latin?How can I ask the spelling of a word in Latin?What would be the etymologically Greek spelling of 'misogynoir'?Emeo – possibly misspelled wordChurch Latin: when did the orthography change occur?Lex Valeria Horatia de senatus consulta - spelling?Spelling aquaeductus togetherWhich Latin word has the most spelling variants?The spelling of τηλικοῦτος
(algebraic topology) question about the cellular approximation theorem
Why doesn't Anakin's lightsaber explode when it's chopped in half on Geonosis?
Deep Learning based time series forecasting
Too many spies!
What are the arguments for California’s nonpartisan blanket primaries other than giving Democrats more power?
Add region constraint to Graphics
How would someone destroy a black hole that’s at the centre of a planet?
What is the German equivalent of 干物女 (dried fish woman)?
Could the crash sites of the Apollo 11 and 16 LMs be seen by the LRO?
Redox reactions redefined
Confused about 誘われて (Sasowarete)
What caused Windows ME's terrible reputation?
How are "soeben" and "eben" different from one another?
Are L-functions uniquely determined by their values at negative integers?
Do native speakers use ZVE or CPU?
Integral clarification
Why does Hellboy file down his horns?
Is this more than a packing puzzle?
Why linear regression uses "vertical" distance to the best-fit-line, instead of actual distance?
Basic example of a formal affine scheme, functorial point of view
Does optical correction give a more aesthetic look to the SBI logo?
As a DM, how to avoid unconscious metagaming when dealing with a high AC character?
Does ability to impeach an expert witness on science or scholarship go too far?
Is this a Lost Mine of Phandelver Plot Hole?
Variation in the spelling of word-final M
The Latin word “Have” rather than “Ave” as a translation of the Greek word Χαῖρε?Were there informal spelling variants in classical Latin?How can I ask the spelling of a word in Latin?What would be the etymologically Greek spelling of 'misogynoir'?Emeo – possibly misspelled wordChurch Latin: when did the orthography change occur?Lex Valeria Horatia de senatus consulta - spelling?Spelling aquaeductus togetherWhich Latin word has the most spelling variants?The spelling of τηλικοῦτος
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I recently visited the museum of the main monastery of the Carthusian order near Grenoble.
I saw this in an open book on display in a former chamber of a monk:
What took me by surprise is the variation in word-final m.
Sometimes it is spelled as a tilde on top of the last vowel, sometimes as a proper m.
For example, the third line has both saltem and vitã.
The tilde only appears in the first stanza in this sample.
This leads me to a more general question:
When both variants of word-final m are available, when are the two options used?
Is one preferred over the other in some cases?
Or is it completely free variation depending on chance and availability of space?
Is there any division of roles between the two when they appear in the same text?
medieval-latin new-latin orthography spelling
add a comment |
I recently visited the museum of the main monastery of the Carthusian order near Grenoble.
I saw this in an open book on display in a former chamber of a monk:
What took me by surprise is the variation in word-final m.
Sometimes it is spelled as a tilde on top of the last vowel, sometimes as a proper m.
For example, the third line has both saltem and vitã.
The tilde only appears in the first stanza in this sample.
This leads me to a more general question:
When both variants of word-final m are available, when are the two options used?
Is one preferred over the other in some cases?
Or is it completely free variation depending on chance and availability of space?
Is there any division of roles between the two when they appear in the same text?
medieval-latin new-latin orthography spelling
add a comment |
I recently visited the museum of the main monastery of the Carthusian order near Grenoble.
I saw this in an open book on display in a former chamber of a monk:
What took me by surprise is the variation in word-final m.
Sometimes it is spelled as a tilde on top of the last vowel, sometimes as a proper m.
For example, the third line has both saltem and vitã.
The tilde only appears in the first stanza in this sample.
This leads me to a more general question:
When both variants of word-final m are available, when are the two options used?
Is one preferred over the other in some cases?
Or is it completely free variation depending on chance and availability of space?
Is there any division of roles between the two when they appear in the same text?
medieval-latin new-latin orthography spelling
I recently visited the museum of the main monastery of the Carthusian order near Grenoble.
I saw this in an open book on display in a former chamber of a monk:
What took me by surprise is the variation in word-final m.
Sometimes it is spelled as a tilde on top of the last vowel, sometimes as a proper m.
For example, the third line has both saltem and vitã.
The tilde only appears in the first stanza in this sample.
This leads me to a more general question:
When both variants of word-final m are available, when are the two options used?
Is one preferred over the other in some cases?
Or is it completely free variation depending on chance and availability of space?
Is there any division of roles between the two when they appear in the same text?
medieval-latin new-latin orthography spelling
medieval-latin new-latin orthography spelling
edited 5 hours ago
Joonas Ilmavirta
asked 8 hours ago
Joonas Ilmavirta♦Joonas Ilmavirta
50.9k12 gold badges73 silver badges305 bronze badges
50.9k12 gold badges73 silver badges305 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I'm afraid my answer is the boring one: free variation, based on the amount of space available.
The tilde originally arose purely as an abbreviation: instead of writing an n or m in line with the text, it could be written above the vowel instead, saving a bit of space. Eventually its form got simplified into the tiny squiggle we use nowadays.
But the meaning was always simply an orthographic one: "there should be an n or m after this letter". It didn't necessarily indicate anything about the pronunciation, or about the grammar: it could be used in prefixes or roots just as well as suffixes. For example, the following shows ĩperpetuũ (i.e. imperpetuum), with two nasals removed in different places:
So in instances like this, the choice of whether to use a letter or a tilde comes down purely to how much space is available. On the second line, writing civium would have compressed the other words in an unpleasant way; on the third line, using both saltem and vitam would have led to too much compression, while both saltẽ and vitã would have left too much empty space. So saltem was written out in full, and vitã abbreviated.
If possible, such as when there's all the space in the world available, final letters are generally included: you can see that there are no abbreviations in the other verses, where there was more freedom to adjust the kerning and spacing (since it didn't have to line up with the notes). But in manuscript documents, where scribal effort and space are at a premium, abbreviations will often be used wherever the scribe can get away with them.
(P.S. The tilde's use eventually expanded to cover other removed letters, apart from n and m. But nasals were always one of the more popular uses for the symbol.)
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "644"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11136%2fvariation-in-the-spelling-of-word-final-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I'm afraid my answer is the boring one: free variation, based on the amount of space available.
The tilde originally arose purely as an abbreviation: instead of writing an n or m in line with the text, it could be written above the vowel instead, saving a bit of space. Eventually its form got simplified into the tiny squiggle we use nowadays.
But the meaning was always simply an orthographic one: "there should be an n or m after this letter". It didn't necessarily indicate anything about the pronunciation, or about the grammar: it could be used in prefixes or roots just as well as suffixes. For example, the following shows ĩperpetuũ (i.e. imperpetuum), with two nasals removed in different places:
So in instances like this, the choice of whether to use a letter or a tilde comes down purely to how much space is available. On the second line, writing civium would have compressed the other words in an unpleasant way; on the third line, using both saltem and vitam would have led to too much compression, while both saltẽ and vitã would have left too much empty space. So saltem was written out in full, and vitã abbreviated.
If possible, such as when there's all the space in the world available, final letters are generally included: you can see that there are no abbreviations in the other verses, where there was more freedom to adjust the kerning and spacing (since it didn't have to line up with the notes). But in manuscript documents, where scribal effort and space are at a premium, abbreviations will often be used wherever the scribe can get away with them.
(P.S. The tilde's use eventually expanded to cover other removed letters, apart from n and m. But nasals were always one of the more popular uses for the symbol.)
add a comment |
I'm afraid my answer is the boring one: free variation, based on the amount of space available.
The tilde originally arose purely as an abbreviation: instead of writing an n or m in line with the text, it could be written above the vowel instead, saving a bit of space. Eventually its form got simplified into the tiny squiggle we use nowadays.
But the meaning was always simply an orthographic one: "there should be an n or m after this letter". It didn't necessarily indicate anything about the pronunciation, or about the grammar: it could be used in prefixes or roots just as well as suffixes. For example, the following shows ĩperpetuũ (i.e. imperpetuum), with two nasals removed in different places:
So in instances like this, the choice of whether to use a letter or a tilde comes down purely to how much space is available. On the second line, writing civium would have compressed the other words in an unpleasant way; on the third line, using both saltem and vitam would have led to too much compression, while both saltẽ and vitã would have left too much empty space. So saltem was written out in full, and vitã abbreviated.
If possible, such as when there's all the space in the world available, final letters are generally included: you can see that there are no abbreviations in the other verses, where there was more freedom to adjust the kerning and spacing (since it didn't have to line up with the notes). But in manuscript documents, where scribal effort and space are at a premium, abbreviations will often be used wherever the scribe can get away with them.
(P.S. The tilde's use eventually expanded to cover other removed letters, apart from n and m. But nasals were always one of the more popular uses for the symbol.)
add a comment |
I'm afraid my answer is the boring one: free variation, based on the amount of space available.
The tilde originally arose purely as an abbreviation: instead of writing an n or m in line with the text, it could be written above the vowel instead, saving a bit of space. Eventually its form got simplified into the tiny squiggle we use nowadays.
But the meaning was always simply an orthographic one: "there should be an n or m after this letter". It didn't necessarily indicate anything about the pronunciation, or about the grammar: it could be used in prefixes or roots just as well as suffixes. For example, the following shows ĩperpetuũ (i.e. imperpetuum), with two nasals removed in different places:
So in instances like this, the choice of whether to use a letter or a tilde comes down purely to how much space is available. On the second line, writing civium would have compressed the other words in an unpleasant way; on the third line, using both saltem and vitam would have led to too much compression, while both saltẽ and vitã would have left too much empty space. So saltem was written out in full, and vitã abbreviated.
If possible, such as when there's all the space in the world available, final letters are generally included: you can see that there are no abbreviations in the other verses, where there was more freedom to adjust the kerning and spacing (since it didn't have to line up with the notes). But in manuscript documents, where scribal effort and space are at a premium, abbreviations will often be used wherever the scribe can get away with them.
(P.S. The tilde's use eventually expanded to cover other removed letters, apart from n and m. But nasals were always one of the more popular uses for the symbol.)
I'm afraid my answer is the boring one: free variation, based on the amount of space available.
The tilde originally arose purely as an abbreviation: instead of writing an n or m in line with the text, it could be written above the vowel instead, saving a bit of space. Eventually its form got simplified into the tiny squiggle we use nowadays.
But the meaning was always simply an orthographic one: "there should be an n or m after this letter". It didn't necessarily indicate anything about the pronunciation, or about the grammar: it could be used in prefixes or roots just as well as suffixes. For example, the following shows ĩperpetuũ (i.e. imperpetuum), with two nasals removed in different places:
So in instances like this, the choice of whether to use a letter or a tilde comes down purely to how much space is available. On the second line, writing civium would have compressed the other words in an unpleasant way; on the third line, using both saltem and vitam would have led to too much compression, while both saltẽ and vitã would have left too much empty space. So saltem was written out in full, and vitã abbreviated.
If possible, such as when there's all the space in the world available, final letters are generally included: you can see that there are no abbreviations in the other verses, where there was more freedom to adjust the kerning and spacing (since it didn't have to line up with the notes). But in manuscript documents, where scribal effort and space are at a premium, abbreviations will often be used wherever the scribe can get away with them.
(P.S. The tilde's use eventually expanded to cover other removed letters, apart from n and m. But nasals were always one of the more popular uses for the symbol.)
answered 7 hours ago
DraconisDraconis
23.4k2 gold badges32 silver badges98 bronze badges
23.4k2 gold badges32 silver badges98 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Latin Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2flatin.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f11136%2fvariation-in-the-spelling-of-word-final-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown