A reccomended structured approach to self studying music theory for songwritingUse of Music Theory in CompositionWhat makes graduate-level music theory different from undergraduate-level music theory?Help with understanding ABRSM grades?Guide to Applying Music Theory to GuitarDoes composing and learning music theory solely on DAWs restrict one's learning experience?can music theory sabotage creativityHow long does Grade 6 music theory take?Is it better to learn scales or chords first in Music Theory?Music theory for Bach's Inventions
How to render "have ideas above his station" into German
Get the full text of a long request
What is the purpose/function of this power inductor in parallel?
Would getting a natural 20 with a penalty still count as a critical hit?
When does The Truman Show take place?
Do predators tend to have vertical slit pupils versus horizontal for prey animals?
Can anybody tell me who this Pokemon is?
Adjective or adverb before another adjective
Are there any OR challenges that are similar to kaggle's competitions?
Why don't modern jet engines use forced exhaust mixing?
Regression when x and y each have uncertainties
What if a restaurant suddenly cannot accept credit cards, and the customer has no cash?
How can I change the movement to Linear?
Why should I pay for an SSL certificate?
Are unaudited server logs admissible in a court of law?
Build a mob of suspiciously happy lenny faces ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Get file name and directory in .vimrc file
Is this bar slide trick shown on Cheers real or a visual effect?
Heyawacky: Ace of Cups
Number of matrices with bounded products of rows and columns
Do I need to start off my book by describing the character's "normal world"?
global variant of csname…endcsname
May the tower use the runway while an emergency aircraft is inbound?
How should you gracefully leave a company you helped start?
A reccomended structured approach to self studying music theory for songwriting
Use of Music Theory in CompositionWhat makes graduate-level music theory different from undergraduate-level music theory?Help with understanding ABRSM grades?Guide to Applying Music Theory to GuitarDoes composing and learning music theory solely on DAWs restrict one's learning experience?can music theory sabotage creativityHow long does Grade 6 music theory take?Is it better to learn scales or chords first in Music Theory?Music theory for Bach's Inventions
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
A bit of background information: My piano level is levelled with the Trinity Level 1 Diploma and my music theory knowledge is from the ABRSM Grade 5 exam.
I want to become a songwriter and I need more knowledge of music theory
If you were to teach me all the music theory in the world for songwriting then what textbooks would you use? What things would you advise me to do whilst going through these books? Anything to be mindful of, habits to get into/avoid, etc...
_______ Down below is my random rant. Apologies! :/
I've looked at alot of answers similar to this question and it always goes along the lines of.... " Don't study music theory because it inhibits creativity & expression! Instead you should dissect the songs themselves and see what you like and don't like!".
Without any idea of what tools there are, then what tools can I use in the first place? What if I used them unconventionally? What would happen if I mixed X and Y when X was supposedly only supposed to go with Z? This is why I want to learn music theory, because I want to have more tools to mess around with. In this sense I firmly believe that music theory does not inhibit creativity rather gives you an opportunity to be even more creative.
I don't want to go through and rediscover these tools on my own when its clearly out there in a 200 page book.
So any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks! :)
theory
New contributor
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
A bit of background information: My piano level is levelled with the Trinity Level 1 Diploma and my music theory knowledge is from the ABRSM Grade 5 exam.
I want to become a songwriter and I need more knowledge of music theory
If you were to teach me all the music theory in the world for songwriting then what textbooks would you use? What things would you advise me to do whilst going through these books? Anything to be mindful of, habits to get into/avoid, etc...
_______ Down below is my random rant. Apologies! :/
I've looked at alot of answers similar to this question and it always goes along the lines of.... " Don't study music theory because it inhibits creativity & expression! Instead you should dissect the songs themselves and see what you like and don't like!".
Without any idea of what tools there are, then what tools can I use in the first place? What if I used them unconventionally? What would happen if I mixed X and Y when X was supposedly only supposed to go with Z? This is why I want to learn music theory, because I want to have more tools to mess around with. In this sense I firmly believe that music theory does not inhibit creativity rather gives you an opportunity to be even more creative.
I don't want to go through and rediscover these tools on my own when its clearly out there in a 200 page book.
So any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks! :)
theory
New contributor
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
A [very valid] part of the argument that "you don't need an education" is that you only need 2 chords to make a good song - guitarplayerbox.com/two/chord/guitar/songs You could argue [easily] that Eleanor Rigby isn't really 2 chords, but the point still stands.
– Tetsujin
7 hours ago
add a comment |
A bit of background information: My piano level is levelled with the Trinity Level 1 Diploma and my music theory knowledge is from the ABRSM Grade 5 exam.
I want to become a songwriter and I need more knowledge of music theory
If you were to teach me all the music theory in the world for songwriting then what textbooks would you use? What things would you advise me to do whilst going through these books? Anything to be mindful of, habits to get into/avoid, etc...
_______ Down below is my random rant. Apologies! :/
I've looked at alot of answers similar to this question and it always goes along the lines of.... " Don't study music theory because it inhibits creativity & expression! Instead you should dissect the songs themselves and see what you like and don't like!".
Without any idea of what tools there are, then what tools can I use in the first place? What if I used them unconventionally? What would happen if I mixed X and Y when X was supposedly only supposed to go with Z? This is why I want to learn music theory, because I want to have more tools to mess around with. In this sense I firmly believe that music theory does not inhibit creativity rather gives you an opportunity to be even more creative.
I don't want to go through and rediscover these tools on my own when its clearly out there in a 200 page book.
So any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks! :)
theory
New contributor
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
A bit of background information: My piano level is levelled with the Trinity Level 1 Diploma and my music theory knowledge is from the ABRSM Grade 5 exam.
I want to become a songwriter and I need more knowledge of music theory
If you were to teach me all the music theory in the world for songwriting then what textbooks would you use? What things would you advise me to do whilst going through these books? Anything to be mindful of, habits to get into/avoid, etc...
_______ Down below is my random rant. Apologies! :/
I've looked at alot of answers similar to this question and it always goes along the lines of.... " Don't study music theory because it inhibits creativity & expression! Instead you should dissect the songs themselves and see what you like and don't like!".
Without any idea of what tools there are, then what tools can I use in the first place? What if I used them unconventionally? What would happen if I mixed X and Y when X was supposedly only supposed to go with Z? This is why I want to learn music theory, because I want to have more tools to mess around with. In this sense I firmly believe that music theory does not inhibit creativity rather gives you an opportunity to be even more creative.
I don't want to go through and rediscover these tools on my own when its clearly out there in a 200 page book.
So any guidance would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks! :)
theory
theory
New contributor
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
Ethan CrockettEthan Crockett
141 bronze badge
141 bronze badge
New contributor
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
A [very valid] part of the argument that "you don't need an education" is that you only need 2 chords to make a good song - guitarplayerbox.com/two/chord/guitar/songs You could argue [easily] that Eleanor Rigby isn't really 2 chords, but the point still stands.
– Tetsujin
7 hours ago
add a comment |
A [very valid] part of the argument that "you don't need an education" is that you only need 2 chords to make a good song - guitarplayerbox.com/two/chord/guitar/songs You could argue [easily] that Eleanor Rigby isn't really 2 chords, but the point still stands.
– Tetsujin
7 hours ago
A [very valid] part of the argument that "you don't need an education" is that you only need 2 chords to make a good song - guitarplayerbox.com/two/chord/guitar/songs You could argue [easily] that Eleanor Rigby isn't really 2 chords, but the point still stands.
– Tetsujin
7 hours ago
A [very valid] part of the argument that "you don't need an education" is that you only need 2 chords to make a good song - guitarplayerbox.com/two/chord/guitar/songs You could argue [easily] that Eleanor Rigby isn't really 2 chords, but the point still stands.
– Tetsujin
7 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
"What would happen if I mixed X and Y when X was supposedly only supposed to go with Z?"
Well, that's what you're MEANT to do, mix things up and find YOUR style :-)
However:
Sounds like you're OK on rudiments. You read the language. Now you look at songs.
Study the 'Golden Age' American composers - Kern, Gershwin, Porter, Berlin. You shouldn't have too much problem with harmonic analysis - they're pretty well based in Common Practice. A bit of Blues creeps in, and they can be (over)fond of the Chromatic Mediant (ii, V, I in C followed by ii, V, I in Eb got to be a bit of a cliche). But they don't go in for much that's too off-the-wall. But look at the craft. The rhyme-schemes in the lyrics. The fit of music to lyric - "But how strange the change from major to minor" (and if you don't recognise that quote, I question your interest in Popular Song!)
Then, in the 50s and 60s the prevailing style simplified. The 'Three chord trick' (well, actually it was often a 'Four chord trick' - C, Am, F, G7).
Then Bacharach and The Beatles. They shared a liking for the ♭VII chord - something that still unsettles a lot of users here who have been brainwashed into the idea that anything non-diatonic MUST imply a change of key!
Then the reaction against traditional melody and harmony. The Top 100 filled up with chanted lyrics over a repetitive, looped 'beat'. And the guitar-strummers, stringing chords together in ways that defy structured harmonic analysis.
And more. But that'll do for now! Is there anything above that is alien to you? Anything that you couldn't look at the sheet music and recognise what I'm talking about? Anything that makes you say 'Yes! THAT's the sort of song I want to write!'? Answer those questions, we may have some specific advice. But, given that you're already musically literate, I'm afraid the advice will very likely be a list of songs to study, dissect and try to copy. Precisely what you DIDN'T ask for. Sorry!
1
'Major to minor'. I've always played major IV to bVII9. But then the words wouldn't fit quite as well...
– Tim
6 hours ago
As long as that note flattens, it's no big difference! On another point - Ella's version is lovely, but look at what 'The Sassy, Sophisticated, Sentimental Cole Porter' actually wrote in the fourth bar. Long note on 'die', throw-away 8ths on 'a little'. I die - but only a little! Life goes on.
– Laurence Payne
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Songwriting is a lot different from knowing theory.
Knowing a lot of theory won't necessarily make you a good (or any sort of) songwriter.
There have been many, many people who have little or no theory, but have written some brilliant songs. There have been many, many people who have vast theory knowledge who have written some awful songs.
With grade V theory under your belt, it's more than enough to use to write songs (theoretically!), but there's a heck of a lot more to it than knowing that a B♭ chord works well after an F7. And putting X with Y or Z is part of the journey. If every songwriter kept to 'the rules' (whatever they might be) we'd still be driving cars with square wheels, if that makes sense!
And there's always the 'read all about it, therefore I can now do it' approach. It often isn't true. Have a go at it, and after a while it'll get easier is maybe a better way to regard things.
Do you sit at the piano and doodle? What comes out? Sometimes it may be good - others mediocre. But at least record it, either in sound or on paper.
Listen to a lot of songs in a style you'd like to emulate. Do what the writer of 'How to become a Good Songwriter' would do. Analyse, swap bits round, change a few notes/chords. Throw a bit of theory in if you must - the chord usually contains the main note/s sung, etc.
Above all, remember - you have to kiss a lot of frogs. A bit like shooting a film - ten days work for ten minutes in the can - if you're lucky. Sorry, can't recommend any books - mostly 'cos it isn't allowed on this site!
add a comment |
If you were to teach me all the music theory in the world for songwriting then what textbooks would you use?
Taking the question literally - all of them!
Of course the problem with that is that reading all the books won't leave you any time for writing songs...
Even answering your question a bit more sensibly - I'm not aware of any single theory book that covers a large percentage of what you could usefully know as a songwriter. Most theory books are written from a specific perspective, either in terms of level, or style, or degree of abstraction.
As a couple of random recommendations on the music side...
What makes music sound good?
Music Theory through Performance and Composition
But I think the harder thing in song writing is the lyrics!
Without any idea of what tools there are, then what tools can I use in the first place?
There's an almost infinite number of tools you could use. Again, the problem is that if you spend your whole life learning about all the possible perspectives you could take on music, it doesn't leave much time for actually making any.
This is why the approach of looking at particular songs is a good one, because it provides more focus - you can take that particular song, and ask yourself whether you have the ability to make sense of how and why it works. If not - that's your cue to learn a bit more theory.
I've looked at a lot of answers similar to this question and it always goes along the lines of.... "Don't study music theory because it inhibits creativity & expression!"
Well, knowing theory won't limit creativity - but taking the approach that you can only do things in music that are 'allowed' by some rule or other might limit you. On the other hand, if you're not finding any inspiration from elsewhere, following some 'rules' could be inspiring - and of course 'rules' are arguably what define existing genres.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87827%2fa-reccomended-structured-approach-to-self-studying-music-theory-for-songwriting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
"What would happen if I mixed X and Y when X was supposedly only supposed to go with Z?"
Well, that's what you're MEANT to do, mix things up and find YOUR style :-)
However:
Sounds like you're OK on rudiments. You read the language. Now you look at songs.
Study the 'Golden Age' American composers - Kern, Gershwin, Porter, Berlin. You shouldn't have too much problem with harmonic analysis - they're pretty well based in Common Practice. A bit of Blues creeps in, and they can be (over)fond of the Chromatic Mediant (ii, V, I in C followed by ii, V, I in Eb got to be a bit of a cliche). But they don't go in for much that's too off-the-wall. But look at the craft. The rhyme-schemes in the lyrics. The fit of music to lyric - "But how strange the change from major to minor" (and if you don't recognise that quote, I question your interest in Popular Song!)
Then, in the 50s and 60s the prevailing style simplified. The 'Three chord trick' (well, actually it was often a 'Four chord trick' - C, Am, F, G7).
Then Bacharach and The Beatles. They shared a liking for the ♭VII chord - something that still unsettles a lot of users here who have been brainwashed into the idea that anything non-diatonic MUST imply a change of key!
Then the reaction against traditional melody and harmony. The Top 100 filled up with chanted lyrics over a repetitive, looped 'beat'. And the guitar-strummers, stringing chords together in ways that defy structured harmonic analysis.
And more. But that'll do for now! Is there anything above that is alien to you? Anything that you couldn't look at the sheet music and recognise what I'm talking about? Anything that makes you say 'Yes! THAT's the sort of song I want to write!'? Answer those questions, we may have some specific advice. But, given that you're already musically literate, I'm afraid the advice will very likely be a list of songs to study, dissect and try to copy. Precisely what you DIDN'T ask for. Sorry!
1
'Major to minor'. I've always played major IV to bVII9. But then the words wouldn't fit quite as well...
– Tim
6 hours ago
As long as that note flattens, it's no big difference! On another point - Ella's version is lovely, but look at what 'The Sassy, Sophisticated, Sentimental Cole Porter' actually wrote in the fourth bar. Long note on 'die', throw-away 8ths on 'a little'. I die - but only a little! Life goes on.
– Laurence Payne
6 hours ago
add a comment |
"What would happen if I mixed X and Y when X was supposedly only supposed to go with Z?"
Well, that's what you're MEANT to do, mix things up and find YOUR style :-)
However:
Sounds like you're OK on rudiments. You read the language. Now you look at songs.
Study the 'Golden Age' American composers - Kern, Gershwin, Porter, Berlin. You shouldn't have too much problem with harmonic analysis - they're pretty well based in Common Practice. A bit of Blues creeps in, and they can be (over)fond of the Chromatic Mediant (ii, V, I in C followed by ii, V, I in Eb got to be a bit of a cliche). But they don't go in for much that's too off-the-wall. But look at the craft. The rhyme-schemes in the lyrics. The fit of music to lyric - "But how strange the change from major to minor" (and if you don't recognise that quote, I question your interest in Popular Song!)
Then, in the 50s and 60s the prevailing style simplified. The 'Three chord trick' (well, actually it was often a 'Four chord trick' - C, Am, F, G7).
Then Bacharach and The Beatles. They shared a liking for the ♭VII chord - something that still unsettles a lot of users here who have been brainwashed into the idea that anything non-diatonic MUST imply a change of key!
Then the reaction against traditional melody and harmony. The Top 100 filled up with chanted lyrics over a repetitive, looped 'beat'. And the guitar-strummers, stringing chords together in ways that defy structured harmonic analysis.
And more. But that'll do for now! Is there anything above that is alien to you? Anything that you couldn't look at the sheet music and recognise what I'm talking about? Anything that makes you say 'Yes! THAT's the sort of song I want to write!'? Answer those questions, we may have some specific advice. But, given that you're already musically literate, I'm afraid the advice will very likely be a list of songs to study, dissect and try to copy. Precisely what you DIDN'T ask for. Sorry!
1
'Major to minor'. I've always played major IV to bVII9. But then the words wouldn't fit quite as well...
– Tim
6 hours ago
As long as that note flattens, it's no big difference! On another point - Ella's version is lovely, but look at what 'The Sassy, Sophisticated, Sentimental Cole Porter' actually wrote in the fourth bar. Long note on 'die', throw-away 8ths on 'a little'. I die - but only a little! Life goes on.
– Laurence Payne
6 hours ago
add a comment |
"What would happen if I mixed X and Y when X was supposedly only supposed to go with Z?"
Well, that's what you're MEANT to do, mix things up and find YOUR style :-)
However:
Sounds like you're OK on rudiments. You read the language. Now you look at songs.
Study the 'Golden Age' American composers - Kern, Gershwin, Porter, Berlin. You shouldn't have too much problem with harmonic analysis - they're pretty well based in Common Practice. A bit of Blues creeps in, and they can be (over)fond of the Chromatic Mediant (ii, V, I in C followed by ii, V, I in Eb got to be a bit of a cliche). But they don't go in for much that's too off-the-wall. But look at the craft. The rhyme-schemes in the lyrics. The fit of music to lyric - "But how strange the change from major to minor" (and if you don't recognise that quote, I question your interest in Popular Song!)
Then, in the 50s and 60s the prevailing style simplified. The 'Three chord trick' (well, actually it was often a 'Four chord trick' - C, Am, F, G7).
Then Bacharach and The Beatles. They shared a liking for the ♭VII chord - something that still unsettles a lot of users here who have been brainwashed into the idea that anything non-diatonic MUST imply a change of key!
Then the reaction against traditional melody and harmony. The Top 100 filled up with chanted lyrics over a repetitive, looped 'beat'. And the guitar-strummers, stringing chords together in ways that defy structured harmonic analysis.
And more. But that'll do for now! Is there anything above that is alien to you? Anything that you couldn't look at the sheet music and recognise what I'm talking about? Anything that makes you say 'Yes! THAT's the sort of song I want to write!'? Answer those questions, we may have some specific advice. But, given that you're already musically literate, I'm afraid the advice will very likely be a list of songs to study, dissect and try to copy. Precisely what you DIDN'T ask for. Sorry!
"What would happen if I mixed X and Y when X was supposedly only supposed to go with Z?"
Well, that's what you're MEANT to do, mix things up and find YOUR style :-)
However:
Sounds like you're OK on rudiments. You read the language. Now you look at songs.
Study the 'Golden Age' American composers - Kern, Gershwin, Porter, Berlin. You shouldn't have too much problem with harmonic analysis - they're pretty well based in Common Practice. A bit of Blues creeps in, and they can be (over)fond of the Chromatic Mediant (ii, V, I in C followed by ii, V, I in Eb got to be a bit of a cliche). But they don't go in for much that's too off-the-wall. But look at the craft. The rhyme-schemes in the lyrics. The fit of music to lyric - "But how strange the change from major to minor" (and if you don't recognise that quote, I question your interest in Popular Song!)
Then, in the 50s and 60s the prevailing style simplified. The 'Three chord trick' (well, actually it was often a 'Four chord trick' - C, Am, F, G7).
Then Bacharach and The Beatles. They shared a liking for the ♭VII chord - something that still unsettles a lot of users here who have been brainwashed into the idea that anything non-diatonic MUST imply a change of key!
Then the reaction against traditional melody and harmony. The Top 100 filled up with chanted lyrics over a repetitive, looped 'beat'. And the guitar-strummers, stringing chords together in ways that defy structured harmonic analysis.
And more. But that'll do for now! Is there anything above that is alien to you? Anything that you couldn't look at the sheet music and recognise what I'm talking about? Anything that makes you say 'Yes! THAT's the sort of song I want to write!'? Answer those questions, we may have some specific advice. But, given that you're already musically literate, I'm afraid the advice will very likely be a list of songs to study, dissect and try to copy. Precisely what you DIDN'T ask for. Sorry!
answered 7 hours ago
Laurence PayneLaurence Payne
42.6k24 silver badges84 bronze badges
42.6k24 silver badges84 bronze badges
1
'Major to minor'. I've always played major IV to bVII9. But then the words wouldn't fit quite as well...
– Tim
6 hours ago
As long as that note flattens, it's no big difference! On another point - Ella's version is lovely, but look at what 'The Sassy, Sophisticated, Sentimental Cole Porter' actually wrote in the fourth bar. Long note on 'die', throw-away 8ths on 'a little'. I die - but only a little! Life goes on.
– Laurence Payne
6 hours ago
add a comment |
1
'Major to minor'. I've always played major IV to bVII9. But then the words wouldn't fit quite as well...
– Tim
6 hours ago
As long as that note flattens, it's no big difference! On another point - Ella's version is lovely, but look at what 'The Sassy, Sophisticated, Sentimental Cole Porter' actually wrote in the fourth bar. Long note on 'die', throw-away 8ths on 'a little'. I die - but only a little! Life goes on.
– Laurence Payne
6 hours ago
1
1
'Major to minor'. I've always played major IV to bVII9. But then the words wouldn't fit quite as well...
– Tim
6 hours ago
'Major to minor'. I've always played major IV to bVII9. But then the words wouldn't fit quite as well...
– Tim
6 hours ago
As long as that note flattens, it's no big difference! On another point - Ella's version is lovely, but look at what 'The Sassy, Sophisticated, Sentimental Cole Porter' actually wrote in the fourth bar. Long note on 'die', throw-away 8ths on 'a little'. I die - but only a little! Life goes on.
– Laurence Payne
6 hours ago
As long as that note flattens, it's no big difference! On another point - Ella's version is lovely, but look at what 'The Sassy, Sophisticated, Sentimental Cole Porter' actually wrote in the fourth bar. Long note on 'die', throw-away 8ths on 'a little'. I die - but only a little! Life goes on.
– Laurence Payne
6 hours ago
add a comment |
Songwriting is a lot different from knowing theory.
Knowing a lot of theory won't necessarily make you a good (or any sort of) songwriter.
There have been many, many people who have little or no theory, but have written some brilliant songs. There have been many, many people who have vast theory knowledge who have written some awful songs.
With grade V theory under your belt, it's more than enough to use to write songs (theoretically!), but there's a heck of a lot more to it than knowing that a B♭ chord works well after an F7. And putting X with Y or Z is part of the journey. If every songwriter kept to 'the rules' (whatever they might be) we'd still be driving cars with square wheels, if that makes sense!
And there's always the 'read all about it, therefore I can now do it' approach. It often isn't true. Have a go at it, and after a while it'll get easier is maybe a better way to regard things.
Do you sit at the piano and doodle? What comes out? Sometimes it may be good - others mediocre. But at least record it, either in sound or on paper.
Listen to a lot of songs in a style you'd like to emulate. Do what the writer of 'How to become a Good Songwriter' would do. Analyse, swap bits round, change a few notes/chords. Throw a bit of theory in if you must - the chord usually contains the main note/s sung, etc.
Above all, remember - you have to kiss a lot of frogs. A bit like shooting a film - ten days work for ten minutes in the can - if you're lucky. Sorry, can't recommend any books - mostly 'cos it isn't allowed on this site!
add a comment |
Songwriting is a lot different from knowing theory.
Knowing a lot of theory won't necessarily make you a good (or any sort of) songwriter.
There have been many, many people who have little or no theory, but have written some brilliant songs. There have been many, many people who have vast theory knowledge who have written some awful songs.
With grade V theory under your belt, it's more than enough to use to write songs (theoretically!), but there's a heck of a lot more to it than knowing that a B♭ chord works well after an F7. And putting X with Y or Z is part of the journey. If every songwriter kept to 'the rules' (whatever they might be) we'd still be driving cars with square wheels, if that makes sense!
And there's always the 'read all about it, therefore I can now do it' approach. It often isn't true. Have a go at it, and after a while it'll get easier is maybe a better way to regard things.
Do you sit at the piano and doodle? What comes out? Sometimes it may be good - others mediocre. But at least record it, either in sound or on paper.
Listen to a lot of songs in a style you'd like to emulate. Do what the writer of 'How to become a Good Songwriter' would do. Analyse, swap bits round, change a few notes/chords. Throw a bit of theory in if you must - the chord usually contains the main note/s sung, etc.
Above all, remember - you have to kiss a lot of frogs. A bit like shooting a film - ten days work for ten minutes in the can - if you're lucky. Sorry, can't recommend any books - mostly 'cos it isn't allowed on this site!
add a comment |
Songwriting is a lot different from knowing theory.
Knowing a lot of theory won't necessarily make you a good (or any sort of) songwriter.
There have been many, many people who have little or no theory, but have written some brilliant songs. There have been many, many people who have vast theory knowledge who have written some awful songs.
With grade V theory under your belt, it's more than enough to use to write songs (theoretically!), but there's a heck of a lot more to it than knowing that a B♭ chord works well after an F7. And putting X with Y or Z is part of the journey. If every songwriter kept to 'the rules' (whatever they might be) we'd still be driving cars with square wheels, if that makes sense!
And there's always the 'read all about it, therefore I can now do it' approach. It often isn't true. Have a go at it, and after a while it'll get easier is maybe a better way to regard things.
Do you sit at the piano and doodle? What comes out? Sometimes it may be good - others mediocre. But at least record it, either in sound or on paper.
Listen to a lot of songs in a style you'd like to emulate. Do what the writer of 'How to become a Good Songwriter' would do. Analyse, swap bits round, change a few notes/chords. Throw a bit of theory in if you must - the chord usually contains the main note/s sung, etc.
Above all, remember - you have to kiss a lot of frogs. A bit like shooting a film - ten days work for ten minutes in the can - if you're lucky. Sorry, can't recommend any books - mostly 'cos it isn't allowed on this site!
Songwriting is a lot different from knowing theory.
Knowing a lot of theory won't necessarily make you a good (or any sort of) songwriter.
There have been many, many people who have little or no theory, but have written some brilliant songs. There have been many, many people who have vast theory knowledge who have written some awful songs.
With grade V theory under your belt, it's more than enough to use to write songs (theoretically!), but there's a heck of a lot more to it than knowing that a B♭ chord works well after an F7. And putting X with Y or Z is part of the journey. If every songwriter kept to 'the rules' (whatever they might be) we'd still be driving cars with square wheels, if that makes sense!
And there's always the 'read all about it, therefore I can now do it' approach. It often isn't true. Have a go at it, and after a while it'll get easier is maybe a better way to regard things.
Do you sit at the piano and doodle? What comes out? Sometimes it may be good - others mediocre. But at least record it, either in sound or on paper.
Listen to a lot of songs in a style you'd like to emulate. Do what the writer of 'How to become a Good Songwriter' would do. Analyse, swap bits round, change a few notes/chords. Throw a bit of theory in if you must - the chord usually contains the main note/s sung, etc.
Above all, remember - you have to kiss a lot of frogs. A bit like shooting a film - ten days work for ten minutes in the can - if you're lucky. Sorry, can't recommend any books - mostly 'cos it isn't allowed on this site!
answered 6 hours ago
TimTim
112k11 gold badges110 silver badges283 bronze badges
112k11 gold badges110 silver badges283 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
If you were to teach me all the music theory in the world for songwriting then what textbooks would you use?
Taking the question literally - all of them!
Of course the problem with that is that reading all the books won't leave you any time for writing songs...
Even answering your question a bit more sensibly - I'm not aware of any single theory book that covers a large percentage of what you could usefully know as a songwriter. Most theory books are written from a specific perspective, either in terms of level, or style, or degree of abstraction.
As a couple of random recommendations on the music side...
What makes music sound good?
Music Theory through Performance and Composition
But I think the harder thing in song writing is the lyrics!
Without any idea of what tools there are, then what tools can I use in the first place?
There's an almost infinite number of tools you could use. Again, the problem is that if you spend your whole life learning about all the possible perspectives you could take on music, it doesn't leave much time for actually making any.
This is why the approach of looking at particular songs is a good one, because it provides more focus - you can take that particular song, and ask yourself whether you have the ability to make sense of how and why it works. If not - that's your cue to learn a bit more theory.
I've looked at a lot of answers similar to this question and it always goes along the lines of.... "Don't study music theory because it inhibits creativity & expression!"
Well, knowing theory won't limit creativity - but taking the approach that you can only do things in music that are 'allowed' by some rule or other might limit you. On the other hand, if you're not finding any inspiration from elsewhere, following some 'rules' could be inspiring - and of course 'rules' are arguably what define existing genres.
add a comment |
If you were to teach me all the music theory in the world for songwriting then what textbooks would you use?
Taking the question literally - all of them!
Of course the problem with that is that reading all the books won't leave you any time for writing songs...
Even answering your question a bit more sensibly - I'm not aware of any single theory book that covers a large percentage of what you could usefully know as a songwriter. Most theory books are written from a specific perspective, either in terms of level, or style, or degree of abstraction.
As a couple of random recommendations on the music side...
What makes music sound good?
Music Theory through Performance and Composition
But I think the harder thing in song writing is the lyrics!
Without any idea of what tools there are, then what tools can I use in the first place?
There's an almost infinite number of tools you could use. Again, the problem is that if you spend your whole life learning about all the possible perspectives you could take on music, it doesn't leave much time for actually making any.
This is why the approach of looking at particular songs is a good one, because it provides more focus - you can take that particular song, and ask yourself whether you have the ability to make sense of how and why it works. If not - that's your cue to learn a bit more theory.
I've looked at a lot of answers similar to this question and it always goes along the lines of.... "Don't study music theory because it inhibits creativity & expression!"
Well, knowing theory won't limit creativity - but taking the approach that you can only do things in music that are 'allowed' by some rule or other might limit you. On the other hand, if you're not finding any inspiration from elsewhere, following some 'rules' could be inspiring - and of course 'rules' are arguably what define existing genres.
add a comment |
If you were to teach me all the music theory in the world for songwriting then what textbooks would you use?
Taking the question literally - all of them!
Of course the problem with that is that reading all the books won't leave you any time for writing songs...
Even answering your question a bit more sensibly - I'm not aware of any single theory book that covers a large percentage of what you could usefully know as a songwriter. Most theory books are written from a specific perspective, either in terms of level, or style, or degree of abstraction.
As a couple of random recommendations on the music side...
What makes music sound good?
Music Theory through Performance and Composition
But I think the harder thing in song writing is the lyrics!
Without any idea of what tools there are, then what tools can I use in the first place?
There's an almost infinite number of tools you could use. Again, the problem is that if you spend your whole life learning about all the possible perspectives you could take on music, it doesn't leave much time for actually making any.
This is why the approach of looking at particular songs is a good one, because it provides more focus - you can take that particular song, and ask yourself whether you have the ability to make sense of how and why it works. If not - that's your cue to learn a bit more theory.
I've looked at a lot of answers similar to this question and it always goes along the lines of.... "Don't study music theory because it inhibits creativity & expression!"
Well, knowing theory won't limit creativity - but taking the approach that you can only do things in music that are 'allowed' by some rule or other might limit you. On the other hand, if you're not finding any inspiration from elsewhere, following some 'rules' could be inspiring - and of course 'rules' are arguably what define existing genres.
If you were to teach me all the music theory in the world for songwriting then what textbooks would you use?
Taking the question literally - all of them!
Of course the problem with that is that reading all the books won't leave you any time for writing songs...
Even answering your question a bit more sensibly - I'm not aware of any single theory book that covers a large percentage of what you could usefully know as a songwriter. Most theory books are written from a specific perspective, either in terms of level, or style, or degree of abstraction.
As a couple of random recommendations on the music side...
What makes music sound good?
Music Theory through Performance and Composition
But I think the harder thing in song writing is the lyrics!
Without any idea of what tools there are, then what tools can I use in the first place?
There's an almost infinite number of tools you could use. Again, the problem is that if you spend your whole life learning about all the possible perspectives you could take on music, it doesn't leave much time for actually making any.
This is why the approach of looking at particular songs is a good one, because it provides more focus - you can take that particular song, and ask yourself whether you have the ability to make sense of how and why it works. If not - that's your cue to learn a bit more theory.
I've looked at a lot of answers similar to this question and it always goes along the lines of.... "Don't study music theory because it inhibits creativity & expression!"
Well, knowing theory won't limit creativity - but taking the approach that you can only do things in music that are 'allowed' by some rule or other might limit you. On the other hand, if you're not finding any inspiration from elsewhere, following some 'rules' could be inspiring - and of course 'rules' are arguably what define existing genres.
edited 3 hours ago
answered 3 hours ago
topo mortotopo morto
33.4k2 gold badges53 silver badges127 bronze badges
33.4k2 gold badges53 silver badges127 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Ethan Crockett is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87827%2fa-reccomended-structured-approach-to-self-studying-music-theory-for-songwriting%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
A [very valid] part of the argument that "you don't need an education" is that you only need 2 chords to make a good song - guitarplayerbox.com/two/chord/guitar/songs You could argue [easily] that Eleanor Rigby isn't really 2 chords, but the point still stands.
– Tetsujin
7 hours ago