Does Q ever actually lie?Do the Borg ever lie?Geordi La Forge: Human Lie DetectorCan and did the Q ever give their powers to mortal beings (aside from Riker)?When did young Picard actually meet the Nausicaans in the bar?Are the people created by Q actually real people or are they just illusions and/or fantasy?Were there ever plans for a TNG movie with Q as the main antagonist?Does Q know about the prophets, from DS9?Does Q perform “magic,” or does he actually know how to do everything?Does Worf ever admit to being afraid?Does Q ever appear when an admiral is onboard?

Given a specific computer system, is it possible to estimate the actual precise run time of a piece of Assembly code

How to investigate an unknown 1.5GB file named "sudo" in my Linux home directory?

Heavy Box Stacking

Why don't "echo -e" commands seem to produce the right output?

How does the search space affect the speed of an ILP solver?

How to load files as a quickfix window at start-up

How many possible file types in the output `ls -l` command?

Received email from ISP saying one of my devices has malware

How to get frequency counts using column breaks by row?

How to draw a true pie chart?

Why do motor drives have multiple bus capacitors of small value capacitance instead of a single bus capacitor of large value?

Can two aircraft be allowed to stay on the same runway at the same time?

Is the net torque changed when a partner on a seesaw stands or hangs from her end instead of sitting?

Is Borg adaptation only temporary?

Do universities maintain secret textbooks?

'spazieren' - walking in a silly and affected manner?

Create a list of snaking numbers under 50,000

Ideas behind the 8.Bd3 line in the 4.Ng5 Two Knights Defense

LINQ Extension methods MinBy and MaxBy

How smart contract transactions work?

A word for the urge to do the opposite

Am I required to correct my opponent's assumptions about my morph creatures?

When you have to wait for a short time

My colleague treats me like he's my boss, yet we're on the same level



Does Q ever actually lie?


Do the Borg ever lie?Geordi La Forge: Human Lie DetectorCan and did the Q ever give their powers to mortal beings (aside from Riker)?When did young Picard actually meet the Nausicaans in the bar?Are the people created by Q actually real people or are they just illusions and/or fantasy?Were there ever plans for a TNG movie with Q as the main antagonist?Does Q know about the prophets, from DS9?Does Q perform “magic,” or does he actually know how to do everything?Does Worf ever admit to being afraid?Does Q ever appear when an admiral is onboard?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








3















In the episode Deja-Q, Picard openly accuses Q of being dishonest:




Q: I have no powers. Q the ordinary.



PICARD: Q the liar. Q the misanthrope.




And in the DS9 episode Q-Less, Vash claims that Q was known as "the god of lies" on at least one planet in the Gamma Quadrant




And they weren't exactly thrilled to see you on Brax either. What did they call you? The God of Lies?




However, I can't recall any specific instance of Q being dishonest. He was far from benevolent most of the time and certainly didn't share ALL of his knowledge with the lesser races he encountered but, to my knowledge, he never lied. So why would Picard and others claim he was a liar?










share|improve this question


























  • Apparently Memory Alpha has pages on Lie and Liar. Because why not.

    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago











  • They do and both articles mention the "god of lies" bit but I'm interested in actual instances where Q says or does something dishonest

    – geewhiz
    8 hours ago











  • Define lie. If an omission is a lie, Q does tend to omit things.

    – Jeeped
    8 hours ago











  • Yeah, my comment doesn't answer your question. I just thought it was interesting.

    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago











  • You could argue that his "omnipotence" claim is a lie ("Deja Q"), since he presumably couldn't destroy the rest of the Q with a thought. Maybe he means omnipotence as far as non-Q go.

    – Ham Sandwich
    6 hours ago

















3















In the episode Deja-Q, Picard openly accuses Q of being dishonest:




Q: I have no powers. Q the ordinary.



PICARD: Q the liar. Q the misanthrope.




And in the DS9 episode Q-Less, Vash claims that Q was known as "the god of lies" on at least one planet in the Gamma Quadrant




And they weren't exactly thrilled to see you on Brax either. What did they call you? The God of Lies?




However, I can't recall any specific instance of Q being dishonest. He was far from benevolent most of the time and certainly didn't share ALL of his knowledge with the lesser races he encountered but, to my knowledge, he never lied. So why would Picard and others claim he was a liar?










share|improve this question


























  • Apparently Memory Alpha has pages on Lie and Liar. Because why not.

    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago











  • They do and both articles mention the "god of lies" bit but I'm interested in actual instances where Q says or does something dishonest

    – geewhiz
    8 hours ago











  • Define lie. If an omission is a lie, Q does tend to omit things.

    – Jeeped
    8 hours ago











  • Yeah, my comment doesn't answer your question. I just thought it was interesting.

    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago











  • You could argue that his "omnipotence" claim is a lie ("Deja Q"), since he presumably couldn't destroy the rest of the Q with a thought. Maybe he means omnipotence as far as non-Q go.

    – Ham Sandwich
    6 hours ago













3












3








3








In the episode Deja-Q, Picard openly accuses Q of being dishonest:




Q: I have no powers. Q the ordinary.



PICARD: Q the liar. Q the misanthrope.




And in the DS9 episode Q-Less, Vash claims that Q was known as "the god of lies" on at least one planet in the Gamma Quadrant




And they weren't exactly thrilled to see you on Brax either. What did they call you? The God of Lies?




However, I can't recall any specific instance of Q being dishonest. He was far from benevolent most of the time and certainly didn't share ALL of his knowledge with the lesser races he encountered but, to my knowledge, he never lied. So why would Picard and others claim he was a liar?










share|improve this question
















In the episode Deja-Q, Picard openly accuses Q of being dishonest:




Q: I have no powers. Q the ordinary.



PICARD: Q the liar. Q the misanthrope.




And in the DS9 episode Q-Less, Vash claims that Q was known as "the god of lies" on at least one planet in the Gamma Quadrant




And they weren't exactly thrilled to see you on Brax either. What did they call you? The God of Lies?




However, I can't recall any specific instance of Q being dishonest. He was far from benevolent most of the time and certainly didn't share ALL of his knowledge with the lesser races he encountered but, to my knowledge, he never lied. So why would Picard and others claim he was a liar?







star-trek star-trek-tng star-trek-ds9 star-trek-q






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 8 hours ago









Jenayah

30.8k10 gold badges141 silver badges186 bronze badges




30.8k10 gold badges141 silver badges186 bronze badges










asked 9 hours ago









geewhizgeewhiz

3,6921 gold badge14 silver badges35 bronze badges




3,6921 gold badge14 silver badges35 bronze badges















  • Apparently Memory Alpha has pages on Lie and Liar. Because why not.

    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago











  • They do and both articles mention the "god of lies" bit but I'm interested in actual instances where Q says or does something dishonest

    – geewhiz
    8 hours ago











  • Define lie. If an omission is a lie, Q does tend to omit things.

    – Jeeped
    8 hours ago











  • Yeah, my comment doesn't answer your question. I just thought it was interesting.

    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago











  • You could argue that his "omnipotence" claim is a lie ("Deja Q"), since he presumably couldn't destroy the rest of the Q with a thought. Maybe he means omnipotence as far as non-Q go.

    – Ham Sandwich
    6 hours ago

















  • Apparently Memory Alpha has pages on Lie and Liar. Because why not.

    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago











  • They do and both articles mention the "god of lies" bit but I'm interested in actual instances where Q says or does something dishonest

    – geewhiz
    8 hours ago











  • Define lie. If an omission is a lie, Q does tend to omit things.

    – Jeeped
    8 hours ago











  • Yeah, my comment doesn't answer your question. I just thought it was interesting.

    – Rand al'Thor
    8 hours ago











  • You could argue that his "omnipotence" claim is a lie ("Deja Q"), since he presumably couldn't destroy the rest of the Q with a thought. Maybe he means omnipotence as far as non-Q go.

    – Ham Sandwich
    6 hours ago
















Apparently Memory Alpha has pages on Lie and Liar. Because why not.

– Rand al'Thor
8 hours ago





Apparently Memory Alpha has pages on Lie and Liar. Because why not.

– Rand al'Thor
8 hours ago













They do and both articles mention the "god of lies" bit but I'm interested in actual instances where Q says or does something dishonest

– geewhiz
8 hours ago





They do and both articles mention the "god of lies" bit but I'm interested in actual instances where Q says or does something dishonest

– geewhiz
8 hours ago













Define lie. If an omission is a lie, Q does tend to omit things.

– Jeeped
8 hours ago





Define lie. If an omission is a lie, Q does tend to omit things.

– Jeeped
8 hours ago













Yeah, my comment doesn't answer your question. I just thought it was interesting.

– Rand al'Thor
8 hours ago





Yeah, my comment doesn't answer your question. I just thought it was interesting.

– Rand al'Thor
8 hours ago













You could argue that his "omnipotence" claim is a lie ("Deja Q"), since he presumably couldn't destroy the rest of the Q with a thought. Maybe he means omnipotence as far as non-Q go.

– Ham Sandwich
6 hours ago





You could argue that his "omnipotence" claim is a lie ("Deja Q"), since he presumably couldn't destroy the rest of the Q with a thought. Maybe he means omnipotence as far as non-Q go.

– Ham Sandwich
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















4















On Q's second visit to the Enterprise, he tells a complete untruth.




PICARD: Pay off your wager.



Q: I recall no wager!



TNG: Hide and Q




During his third visit, he lies again since (we later learn) humanity has remained on trial throughout the entire voyage of the Enterprise-D




RIKER: The good times? The first time we met you, you put us on trial for the crimes of humanity.



Q: Of which you were exonerated.



TNG: Q, Who?




He tells a fib in his 6th encounter, stating that Amanda's parents died in an accident when in fact they were murdered.




TROI: What happened to Amanda's parents?



Q: They died in an accident.



TNG: True Q




He lies to Vash in TNG: Q Less. Clearly the inhabitants of Brax hate his guts.




VASH: You're the one who almost got me killed on Errikang Seven. And they weren't exactly thrilled to see you on Brax either. What did they call you? The God of Lies?



Q: They meant it affectionately.



DS9: Q-less




He lies to Janeway in VOY: The Q and the Grey. There's no evidence that he's actually ordered anything at all from the kitchen.




JANEWAY: Janeway to security. Intruder alert.



Q: There's no need to call room service, Kathy. I've already ordered.



The Q and the Grey







share|improve this answer






















  • 5





    To be fair, we don't know that they didn't mean it affectionately

    – geewhiz
    7 hours ago











  • I''ll give you the first one. Q was trying to buy time by lying about forgetting the wager. The third one is dubious. They DID die in an accident regardless of the underlying cause. The second point is murky as the "trial" that Q was referring to seems to be development and evolution. Also, the Q were not going to destroy humanity, humanity-specifically Picard-was.

    – geewhiz
    7 hours ago











  • @geewhiz - It's pretty clear that the "accident" was no accident and that the Braxians didn't mean it affectionately.

    – Valorum
    7 hours ago











  • Concerning the first one, maybe Q's memory isn't like it used to be.

    – Ham Sandwich
    6 hours ago











  • @Valorum I was joking about the Braxians. Good answer!

    – geewhiz
    3 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f218309%2fdoes-q-ever-actually-lie%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









4















On Q's second visit to the Enterprise, he tells a complete untruth.




PICARD: Pay off your wager.



Q: I recall no wager!



TNG: Hide and Q




During his third visit, he lies again since (we later learn) humanity has remained on trial throughout the entire voyage of the Enterprise-D




RIKER: The good times? The first time we met you, you put us on trial for the crimes of humanity.



Q: Of which you were exonerated.



TNG: Q, Who?




He tells a fib in his 6th encounter, stating that Amanda's parents died in an accident when in fact they were murdered.




TROI: What happened to Amanda's parents?



Q: They died in an accident.



TNG: True Q




He lies to Vash in TNG: Q Less. Clearly the inhabitants of Brax hate his guts.




VASH: You're the one who almost got me killed on Errikang Seven. And they weren't exactly thrilled to see you on Brax either. What did they call you? The God of Lies?



Q: They meant it affectionately.



DS9: Q-less




He lies to Janeway in VOY: The Q and the Grey. There's no evidence that he's actually ordered anything at all from the kitchen.




JANEWAY: Janeway to security. Intruder alert.



Q: There's no need to call room service, Kathy. I've already ordered.



The Q and the Grey







share|improve this answer






















  • 5





    To be fair, we don't know that they didn't mean it affectionately

    – geewhiz
    7 hours ago











  • I''ll give you the first one. Q was trying to buy time by lying about forgetting the wager. The third one is dubious. They DID die in an accident regardless of the underlying cause. The second point is murky as the "trial" that Q was referring to seems to be development and evolution. Also, the Q were not going to destroy humanity, humanity-specifically Picard-was.

    – geewhiz
    7 hours ago











  • @geewhiz - It's pretty clear that the "accident" was no accident and that the Braxians didn't mean it affectionately.

    – Valorum
    7 hours ago











  • Concerning the first one, maybe Q's memory isn't like it used to be.

    – Ham Sandwich
    6 hours ago











  • @Valorum I was joking about the Braxians. Good answer!

    – geewhiz
    3 hours ago















4















On Q's second visit to the Enterprise, he tells a complete untruth.




PICARD: Pay off your wager.



Q: I recall no wager!



TNG: Hide and Q




During his third visit, he lies again since (we later learn) humanity has remained on trial throughout the entire voyage of the Enterprise-D




RIKER: The good times? The first time we met you, you put us on trial for the crimes of humanity.



Q: Of which you were exonerated.



TNG: Q, Who?




He tells a fib in his 6th encounter, stating that Amanda's parents died in an accident when in fact they were murdered.




TROI: What happened to Amanda's parents?



Q: They died in an accident.



TNG: True Q




He lies to Vash in TNG: Q Less. Clearly the inhabitants of Brax hate his guts.




VASH: You're the one who almost got me killed on Errikang Seven. And they weren't exactly thrilled to see you on Brax either. What did they call you? The God of Lies?



Q: They meant it affectionately.



DS9: Q-less




He lies to Janeway in VOY: The Q and the Grey. There's no evidence that he's actually ordered anything at all from the kitchen.




JANEWAY: Janeway to security. Intruder alert.



Q: There's no need to call room service, Kathy. I've already ordered.



The Q and the Grey







share|improve this answer






















  • 5





    To be fair, we don't know that they didn't mean it affectionately

    – geewhiz
    7 hours ago











  • I''ll give you the first one. Q was trying to buy time by lying about forgetting the wager. The third one is dubious. They DID die in an accident regardless of the underlying cause. The second point is murky as the "trial" that Q was referring to seems to be development and evolution. Also, the Q were not going to destroy humanity, humanity-specifically Picard-was.

    – geewhiz
    7 hours ago











  • @geewhiz - It's pretty clear that the "accident" was no accident and that the Braxians didn't mean it affectionately.

    – Valorum
    7 hours ago











  • Concerning the first one, maybe Q's memory isn't like it used to be.

    – Ham Sandwich
    6 hours ago











  • @Valorum I was joking about the Braxians. Good answer!

    – geewhiz
    3 hours ago













4














4










4









On Q's second visit to the Enterprise, he tells a complete untruth.




PICARD: Pay off your wager.



Q: I recall no wager!



TNG: Hide and Q




During his third visit, he lies again since (we later learn) humanity has remained on trial throughout the entire voyage of the Enterprise-D




RIKER: The good times? The first time we met you, you put us on trial for the crimes of humanity.



Q: Of which you were exonerated.



TNG: Q, Who?




He tells a fib in his 6th encounter, stating that Amanda's parents died in an accident when in fact they were murdered.




TROI: What happened to Amanda's parents?



Q: They died in an accident.



TNG: True Q




He lies to Vash in TNG: Q Less. Clearly the inhabitants of Brax hate his guts.




VASH: You're the one who almost got me killed on Errikang Seven. And they weren't exactly thrilled to see you on Brax either. What did they call you? The God of Lies?



Q: They meant it affectionately.



DS9: Q-less




He lies to Janeway in VOY: The Q and the Grey. There's no evidence that he's actually ordered anything at all from the kitchen.




JANEWAY: Janeway to security. Intruder alert.



Q: There's no need to call room service, Kathy. I've already ordered.



The Q and the Grey







share|improve this answer















On Q's second visit to the Enterprise, he tells a complete untruth.




PICARD: Pay off your wager.



Q: I recall no wager!



TNG: Hide and Q




During his third visit, he lies again since (we later learn) humanity has remained on trial throughout the entire voyage of the Enterprise-D




RIKER: The good times? The first time we met you, you put us on trial for the crimes of humanity.



Q: Of which you were exonerated.



TNG: Q, Who?




He tells a fib in his 6th encounter, stating that Amanda's parents died in an accident when in fact they were murdered.




TROI: What happened to Amanda's parents?



Q: They died in an accident.



TNG: True Q




He lies to Vash in TNG: Q Less. Clearly the inhabitants of Brax hate his guts.




VASH: You're the one who almost got me killed on Errikang Seven. And they weren't exactly thrilled to see you on Brax either. What did they call you? The God of Lies?



Q: They meant it affectionately.



DS9: Q-less




He lies to Janeway in VOY: The Q and the Grey. There's no evidence that he's actually ordered anything at all from the kitchen.




JANEWAY: Janeway to security. Intruder alert.



Q: There's no need to call room service, Kathy. I've already ordered.



The Q and the Grey








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 8 hours ago









ValorumValorum

441k122 gold badges3242 silver badges3414 bronze badges




441k122 gold badges3242 silver badges3414 bronze badges










  • 5





    To be fair, we don't know that they didn't mean it affectionately

    – geewhiz
    7 hours ago











  • I''ll give you the first one. Q was trying to buy time by lying about forgetting the wager. The third one is dubious. They DID die in an accident regardless of the underlying cause. The second point is murky as the "trial" that Q was referring to seems to be development and evolution. Also, the Q were not going to destroy humanity, humanity-specifically Picard-was.

    – geewhiz
    7 hours ago











  • @geewhiz - It's pretty clear that the "accident" was no accident and that the Braxians didn't mean it affectionately.

    – Valorum
    7 hours ago











  • Concerning the first one, maybe Q's memory isn't like it used to be.

    – Ham Sandwich
    6 hours ago











  • @Valorum I was joking about the Braxians. Good answer!

    – geewhiz
    3 hours ago












  • 5





    To be fair, we don't know that they didn't mean it affectionately

    – geewhiz
    7 hours ago











  • I''ll give you the first one. Q was trying to buy time by lying about forgetting the wager. The third one is dubious. They DID die in an accident regardless of the underlying cause. The second point is murky as the "trial" that Q was referring to seems to be development and evolution. Also, the Q were not going to destroy humanity, humanity-specifically Picard-was.

    – geewhiz
    7 hours ago











  • @geewhiz - It's pretty clear that the "accident" was no accident and that the Braxians didn't mean it affectionately.

    – Valorum
    7 hours ago











  • Concerning the first one, maybe Q's memory isn't like it used to be.

    – Ham Sandwich
    6 hours ago











  • @Valorum I was joking about the Braxians. Good answer!

    – geewhiz
    3 hours ago







5




5





To be fair, we don't know that they didn't mean it affectionately

– geewhiz
7 hours ago





To be fair, we don't know that they didn't mean it affectionately

– geewhiz
7 hours ago













I''ll give you the first one. Q was trying to buy time by lying about forgetting the wager. The third one is dubious. They DID die in an accident regardless of the underlying cause. The second point is murky as the "trial" that Q was referring to seems to be development and evolution. Also, the Q were not going to destroy humanity, humanity-specifically Picard-was.

– geewhiz
7 hours ago





I''ll give you the first one. Q was trying to buy time by lying about forgetting the wager. The third one is dubious. They DID die in an accident regardless of the underlying cause. The second point is murky as the "trial" that Q was referring to seems to be development and evolution. Also, the Q were not going to destroy humanity, humanity-specifically Picard-was.

– geewhiz
7 hours ago













@geewhiz - It's pretty clear that the "accident" was no accident and that the Braxians didn't mean it affectionately.

– Valorum
7 hours ago





@geewhiz - It's pretty clear that the "accident" was no accident and that the Braxians didn't mean it affectionately.

– Valorum
7 hours ago













Concerning the first one, maybe Q's memory isn't like it used to be.

– Ham Sandwich
6 hours ago





Concerning the first one, maybe Q's memory isn't like it used to be.

– Ham Sandwich
6 hours ago













@Valorum I was joking about the Braxians. Good answer!

– geewhiz
3 hours ago





@Valorum I was joking about the Braxians. Good answer!

– geewhiz
3 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f218309%2fdoes-q-ever-actually-lie%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

ParseJSON using SSJSUsing AMPscript with SSJS ActivitiesHow to resubscribe a user in Marketing cloud using SSJS?Pulling Subscriber Status from Lists using SSJSRetrieving Emails using SSJSProblem in updating DE using SSJSUsing SSJS to send single email in Marketing CloudError adding EmailSendDefinition using SSJS

Кампала Садржај Географија Географија Историја Становништво Привреда Партнерски градови Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију0°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.340°11′ СГШ; 32°20′ ИГД / 0.18° СГШ; 32.34° ИГД / 0.18; 32.34МедијиПодациЗванични веб-сајту

19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу