Four-velocity of radially infalling gas in Schwarzschild metricWhat is the Schwarzschild metric with proper radial distance?Schwarzschild metric in Isotropic coordinatesSchwarzschild metric circular orbits and kepler's 3rd lawThe spatial Schwarzschild metricFour-velocity in General-relativistic geodesic equationEnergy of a circular orbit in the Schwarzschild metric?On the embedding of the Schwarzschild metric in six dimensionsAre the space and time axes of Schwarzschild metric uncurved?Freely falling observer in Schwarzschild metricVelocity of a photon according to a stationary observer in Schwarzschild metric

A Checkmate of Dubious Legality

“The Fourier transform cannot measure two phases at the same frequency.” Why not?

Plotting Autoregressive Functions / Linear Difference Equations

What percentage of campground outlets are GFCI or RCD protected?

How do I show and not tell a backstory?

Awk to get all my regular users in shadow

Drawing arrowtips at the end of each segment in a polygonal path

Has J.J.Jameson ever found out that Peter Parker is Spider-Man?

Write The Shortest Program To Check If A Binary Tree Is Balanced

Is a switch from R to Python worth it?

foot-pounds of energy?

…down the primrose path

GFCI tripping on overload?

Are the related objects in an SOQL query shared?

A verb for when some rights are not violated?

Why do dragons like shiny stuff?

Generate random number in Unity without class ambiguity

Why do proponents of guns oppose gun competency tests?

Properties: Left of the colon

Would the shaking of an earthquake be visible to somebody in a low-flying aircraft?

Can the Cauchy product of divergent series with itself be convergent?

Can attackers change the public key of certificate during the SSL handshake

Why is it to say 'paucis post diebus'?

What do "unsettled funds" mean?



Four-velocity of radially infalling gas in Schwarzschild metric


What is the Schwarzschild metric with proper radial distance?Schwarzschild metric in Isotropic coordinatesSchwarzschild metric circular orbits and kepler's 3rd lawThe spatial Schwarzschild metricFour-velocity in General-relativistic geodesic equationEnergy of a circular orbit in the Schwarzschild metric?On the embedding of the Schwarzschild metric in six dimensionsAre the space and time axes of Schwarzschild metric uncurved?Freely falling observer in Schwarzschild metricVelocity of a photon according to a stationary observer in Schwarzschild metric






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1












$begingroup$


I am reading this paper by Thorne, Flammang & Zytkow (1981), which discusses the dynamics of spherical accretion onto a black hole in the Schwarzschild metric ($c=G=1$ units):



$$ds^2=-(1-2M/r)dt^2+(1-2M/r)^-1dr^2+r^2(dtheta^2+sin^2theta dphi^2)$$



For a gas with inward velocity $v$ (as measured by an observer at rest in this metric), equations 2-3 of the paper give this expression for the four-velocity:
$$mathbfu=y(1-2M/r)^-1fracpartialpartial t-vyfracpartialpartial r$$
$$yequivmathbfucdotfracpartialpartial t=(1-2M/r)^1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$$
$y$ is the so-called energy parameter, and it would be a constant if the trajectory was a geodesic.



I am having trouble understanding how to obtain this expression. Here is what I tried so far:



  • The velocity is $v=-fracdrdt$ (minus sign because the gas is moving inward)

  • The four-velocity components are usually written as $U^mu=fracdx^mudtau$, where $tau$ is the proper time

  • By the chain rule, $fracdrdtau=fracdrdtfracdtdtau=-vfracdtdtau$

  • The four-velocity as a vector is $mathbfu=U^mupartial_mu=U^mufracpartialpartial x^mu$

So that:
$$mathbfu=fracdtdtaufracpartialpartial t+fracdrdtaufracpartialpartial r quad\=fracdtdtauleft(fracpartialpartial t-vfracpartialpartial rright)$$



Further, since $ds^2=-dtau^2$, we have:
$$-1=-(1-2M/r)left(fracdtdtauright)^2+(1-2M/r)^-1left(fracdrdtauright)^2\
=left(fracdtdtauright)^2left(-(1-2M/r)+(1-2M/r)^-1v^2right)
$$



I don't see how this can lead to the expression for the four-velocity from the paper, so I must be making a mistake somewhere. Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$


    I am reading this paper by Thorne, Flammang & Zytkow (1981), which discusses the dynamics of spherical accretion onto a black hole in the Schwarzschild metric ($c=G=1$ units):



    $$ds^2=-(1-2M/r)dt^2+(1-2M/r)^-1dr^2+r^2(dtheta^2+sin^2theta dphi^2)$$



    For a gas with inward velocity $v$ (as measured by an observer at rest in this metric), equations 2-3 of the paper give this expression for the four-velocity:
    $$mathbfu=y(1-2M/r)^-1fracpartialpartial t-vyfracpartialpartial r$$
    $$yequivmathbfucdotfracpartialpartial t=(1-2M/r)^1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$$
    $y$ is the so-called energy parameter, and it would be a constant if the trajectory was a geodesic.



    I am having trouble understanding how to obtain this expression. Here is what I tried so far:



    • The velocity is $v=-fracdrdt$ (minus sign because the gas is moving inward)

    • The four-velocity components are usually written as $U^mu=fracdx^mudtau$, where $tau$ is the proper time

    • By the chain rule, $fracdrdtau=fracdrdtfracdtdtau=-vfracdtdtau$

    • The four-velocity as a vector is $mathbfu=U^mupartial_mu=U^mufracpartialpartial x^mu$

    So that:
    $$mathbfu=fracdtdtaufracpartialpartial t+fracdrdtaufracpartialpartial r quad\=fracdtdtauleft(fracpartialpartial t-vfracpartialpartial rright)$$



    Further, since $ds^2=-dtau^2$, we have:
    $$-1=-(1-2M/r)left(fracdtdtauright)^2+(1-2M/r)^-1left(fracdrdtauright)^2\
    =left(fracdtdtauright)^2left(-(1-2M/r)+(1-2M/r)^-1v^2right)
    $$



    I don't see how this can lead to the expression for the four-velocity from the paper, so I must be making a mistake somewhere. Any help would be appreciated.










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$
















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      I am reading this paper by Thorne, Flammang & Zytkow (1981), which discusses the dynamics of spherical accretion onto a black hole in the Schwarzschild metric ($c=G=1$ units):



      $$ds^2=-(1-2M/r)dt^2+(1-2M/r)^-1dr^2+r^2(dtheta^2+sin^2theta dphi^2)$$



      For a gas with inward velocity $v$ (as measured by an observer at rest in this metric), equations 2-3 of the paper give this expression for the four-velocity:
      $$mathbfu=y(1-2M/r)^-1fracpartialpartial t-vyfracpartialpartial r$$
      $$yequivmathbfucdotfracpartialpartial t=(1-2M/r)^1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$$
      $y$ is the so-called energy parameter, and it would be a constant if the trajectory was a geodesic.



      I am having trouble understanding how to obtain this expression. Here is what I tried so far:



      • The velocity is $v=-fracdrdt$ (minus sign because the gas is moving inward)

      • The four-velocity components are usually written as $U^mu=fracdx^mudtau$, where $tau$ is the proper time

      • By the chain rule, $fracdrdtau=fracdrdtfracdtdtau=-vfracdtdtau$

      • The four-velocity as a vector is $mathbfu=U^mupartial_mu=U^mufracpartialpartial x^mu$

      So that:
      $$mathbfu=fracdtdtaufracpartialpartial t+fracdrdtaufracpartialpartial r quad\=fracdtdtauleft(fracpartialpartial t-vfracpartialpartial rright)$$



      Further, since $ds^2=-dtau^2$, we have:
      $$-1=-(1-2M/r)left(fracdtdtauright)^2+(1-2M/r)^-1left(fracdrdtauright)^2\
      =left(fracdtdtauright)^2left(-(1-2M/r)+(1-2M/r)^-1v^2right)
      $$



      I don't see how this can lead to the expression for the four-velocity from the paper, so I must be making a mistake somewhere. Any help would be appreciated.










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      I am reading this paper by Thorne, Flammang & Zytkow (1981), which discusses the dynamics of spherical accretion onto a black hole in the Schwarzschild metric ($c=G=1$ units):



      $$ds^2=-(1-2M/r)dt^2+(1-2M/r)^-1dr^2+r^2(dtheta^2+sin^2theta dphi^2)$$



      For a gas with inward velocity $v$ (as measured by an observer at rest in this metric), equations 2-3 of the paper give this expression for the four-velocity:
      $$mathbfu=y(1-2M/r)^-1fracpartialpartial t-vyfracpartialpartial r$$
      $$yequivmathbfucdotfracpartialpartial t=(1-2M/r)^1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$$
      $y$ is the so-called energy parameter, and it would be a constant if the trajectory was a geodesic.



      I am having trouble understanding how to obtain this expression. Here is what I tried so far:



      • The velocity is $v=-fracdrdt$ (minus sign because the gas is moving inward)

      • The four-velocity components are usually written as $U^mu=fracdx^mudtau$, where $tau$ is the proper time

      • By the chain rule, $fracdrdtau=fracdrdtfracdtdtau=-vfracdtdtau$

      • The four-velocity as a vector is $mathbfu=U^mupartial_mu=U^mufracpartialpartial x^mu$

      So that:
      $$mathbfu=fracdtdtaufracpartialpartial t+fracdrdtaufracpartialpartial r quad\=fracdtdtauleft(fracpartialpartial t-vfracpartialpartial rright)$$



      Further, since $ds^2=-dtau^2$, we have:
      $$-1=-(1-2M/r)left(fracdtdtauright)^2+(1-2M/r)^-1left(fracdrdtauright)^2\
      =left(fracdtdtauright)^2left(-(1-2M/r)+(1-2M/r)^-1v^2right)
      $$



      I don't see how this can lead to the expression for the four-velocity from the paper, so I must be making a mistake somewhere. Any help would be appreciated.







      general-relativity black-holes






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      Simon G.Simon G.

      165 bronze badges




      165 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The velocity $v$ is not $dr/dt$. What the paper says is




          $vquad$ inward velocity of gas as measured by an observer at fixed $r$ in his local proper reference frame




          This means that you need to build an orthonormal frame from the $partial/partial^mu$ vectors at a given spacetime point. Well, you can check that the vectors



          $$mathbfe_hatt = frac1sqrt1-2M/r partial_t quad textand quad mathbfe_hatr = sqrt1 - 2M/r partial_r$$



          are orthonormal, satisfying $mathbfe_hatt cdot mathbfe_hatt = -1$ and $mathbfe_hatr cdot mathbfe_hatr = 1$. In terms of these, the four-velocity is



          $$mathbfu = fracysqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_hatt - fracvysqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_hatr = u^hatmu mathbfe_hatmu,$$



          and we have that $v = -u^hatr/u^hatt$. Or, to put it another way, the four-velocity has the $mathbfu = (gamma, -gamma v)$ structure we expect from special relativity.




          What if we want to go the other way and write down an expression for the four-velocity? We start with our expressions for the orthonormal basis vectors $mathbfe_hatmu$ and the four-velocity $mathbfu = u^hatt mathbfe_hatt + u^hatr mathbfe_hatr$. From the special relativistic formula $mathbfu = gamma(v) mathbfe_hatt - gamma(v) v mathbfe_hatr$ (which holds since we're in an orthonormal basis), we get that $u^hatt = gamma(v)$ and $u^hatr = -gamma(v) v$. Finally, going back to the $partial_mu$ basis, we find



          $$mathbfu = fracgamma(v)sqrt1-2M/r partial_t - gamma(v) v sqrt1-2M/r partial_r.$$



          This is the same as the given expression if we define $y = - mathbfu cdot partial_t = - g_tt u^t$, which works out to $y = gamma(v) sqrt1-2M/r$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I did have a misconception about which velocity v is. I see how this leads to the expression in the paper, but could you explain how to get the u components in this basis?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @SimonG. I just replaced the $partial_mu$ vectors in terms of the $mathbfe_hatmu$, using that $partial_t = sqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_t$ and so on.
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            But how would I get the expression for the four-velocity in the first place? Where do $y$ and $v$ come from if I'm starting from this orthonormal basis?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            @SimonG. I've updated my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, I did not know that this connection between orthonormal bases and special relativity could be made. It makes sense!
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Javier's answer is correct, but here's another way of seeing it: An observer's "local radial coordinate" $tilder$ and "local time coordinate" $tildet$ are defined such that the metric is (locally) $ds^2 = - dtildet^2 + dtilder^2$ (suppressing angular coordinates). It is evident that under this definition, $dtildet = dt sqrt1 - 2M/r $ and $d tilder = dr / sqrt1 - 2M/r$. Thus,
          $$
          -v = fracdtilderdtildet = frac11 - 2M/r fracdrdt.
          $$

          This implies that
          $$
          u^mu = fracdtdtau left( 1, fracdrdt , 0, 0 right) = fracdtdtau left( 1, -left(1 - frac2Mrright) v, 0, 0 right).
          $$

          Further requiring that $u^mu u_mu = -1$ then leads to
          $$
          fracdtdtau = sqrtfrac1(1 - 2M/r)(1 - v^2),
          $$

          which is equivalent to the expressions provided.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Although this is correct, one has to be careful, because the equations with the differentials don't necessarily define actual coordinate functions $tildet$ and $tilder$. The quotation marks around "local coordinates" are very important!
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer is more intuitive to me. The fact that local coordinates are equivalent to flat spacetime is only true exactly at point $p$ where the observer is, correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Michael. Just a small correction, $dt/dtau = (1-2M/r)^-1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$.
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            5 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "151"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f495383%2ffour-velocity-of-radially-infalling-gas-in-schwarzschild-metric%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          The velocity $v$ is not $dr/dt$. What the paper says is




          $vquad$ inward velocity of gas as measured by an observer at fixed $r$ in his local proper reference frame




          This means that you need to build an orthonormal frame from the $partial/partial^mu$ vectors at a given spacetime point. Well, you can check that the vectors



          $$mathbfe_hatt = frac1sqrt1-2M/r partial_t quad textand quad mathbfe_hatr = sqrt1 - 2M/r partial_r$$



          are orthonormal, satisfying $mathbfe_hatt cdot mathbfe_hatt = -1$ and $mathbfe_hatr cdot mathbfe_hatr = 1$. In terms of these, the four-velocity is



          $$mathbfu = fracysqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_hatt - fracvysqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_hatr = u^hatmu mathbfe_hatmu,$$



          and we have that $v = -u^hatr/u^hatt$. Or, to put it another way, the four-velocity has the $mathbfu = (gamma, -gamma v)$ structure we expect from special relativity.




          What if we want to go the other way and write down an expression for the four-velocity? We start with our expressions for the orthonormal basis vectors $mathbfe_hatmu$ and the four-velocity $mathbfu = u^hatt mathbfe_hatt + u^hatr mathbfe_hatr$. From the special relativistic formula $mathbfu = gamma(v) mathbfe_hatt - gamma(v) v mathbfe_hatr$ (which holds since we're in an orthonormal basis), we get that $u^hatt = gamma(v)$ and $u^hatr = -gamma(v) v$. Finally, going back to the $partial_mu$ basis, we find



          $$mathbfu = fracgamma(v)sqrt1-2M/r partial_t - gamma(v) v sqrt1-2M/r partial_r.$$



          This is the same as the given expression if we define $y = - mathbfu cdot partial_t = - g_tt u^t$, which works out to $y = gamma(v) sqrt1-2M/r$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I did have a misconception about which velocity v is. I see how this leads to the expression in the paper, but could you explain how to get the u components in this basis?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @SimonG. I just replaced the $partial_mu$ vectors in terms of the $mathbfe_hatmu$, using that $partial_t = sqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_t$ and so on.
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            But how would I get the expression for the four-velocity in the first place? Where do $y$ and $v$ come from if I'm starting from this orthonormal basis?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            @SimonG. I've updated my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, I did not know that this connection between orthonormal bases and special relativity could be made. It makes sense!
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago















          3












          $begingroup$

          The velocity $v$ is not $dr/dt$. What the paper says is




          $vquad$ inward velocity of gas as measured by an observer at fixed $r$ in his local proper reference frame




          This means that you need to build an orthonormal frame from the $partial/partial^mu$ vectors at a given spacetime point. Well, you can check that the vectors



          $$mathbfe_hatt = frac1sqrt1-2M/r partial_t quad textand quad mathbfe_hatr = sqrt1 - 2M/r partial_r$$



          are orthonormal, satisfying $mathbfe_hatt cdot mathbfe_hatt = -1$ and $mathbfe_hatr cdot mathbfe_hatr = 1$. In terms of these, the four-velocity is



          $$mathbfu = fracysqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_hatt - fracvysqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_hatr = u^hatmu mathbfe_hatmu,$$



          and we have that $v = -u^hatr/u^hatt$. Or, to put it another way, the four-velocity has the $mathbfu = (gamma, -gamma v)$ structure we expect from special relativity.




          What if we want to go the other way and write down an expression for the four-velocity? We start with our expressions for the orthonormal basis vectors $mathbfe_hatmu$ and the four-velocity $mathbfu = u^hatt mathbfe_hatt + u^hatr mathbfe_hatr$. From the special relativistic formula $mathbfu = gamma(v) mathbfe_hatt - gamma(v) v mathbfe_hatr$ (which holds since we're in an orthonormal basis), we get that $u^hatt = gamma(v)$ and $u^hatr = -gamma(v) v$. Finally, going back to the $partial_mu$ basis, we find



          $$mathbfu = fracgamma(v)sqrt1-2M/r partial_t - gamma(v) v sqrt1-2M/r partial_r.$$



          This is the same as the given expression if we define $y = - mathbfu cdot partial_t = - g_tt u^t$, which works out to $y = gamma(v) sqrt1-2M/r$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I did have a misconception about which velocity v is. I see how this leads to the expression in the paper, but could you explain how to get the u components in this basis?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @SimonG. I just replaced the $partial_mu$ vectors in terms of the $mathbfe_hatmu$, using that $partial_t = sqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_t$ and so on.
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            But how would I get the expression for the four-velocity in the first place? Where do $y$ and $v$ come from if I'm starting from this orthonormal basis?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            @SimonG. I've updated my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, I did not know that this connection between orthonormal bases and special relativity could be made. It makes sense!
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          The velocity $v$ is not $dr/dt$. What the paper says is




          $vquad$ inward velocity of gas as measured by an observer at fixed $r$ in his local proper reference frame




          This means that you need to build an orthonormal frame from the $partial/partial^mu$ vectors at a given spacetime point. Well, you can check that the vectors



          $$mathbfe_hatt = frac1sqrt1-2M/r partial_t quad textand quad mathbfe_hatr = sqrt1 - 2M/r partial_r$$



          are orthonormal, satisfying $mathbfe_hatt cdot mathbfe_hatt = -1$ and $mathbfe_hatr cdot mathbfe_hatr = 1$. In terms of these, the four-velocity is



          $$mathbfu = fracysqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_hatt - fracvysqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_hatr = u^hatmu mathbfe_hatmu,$$



          and we have that $v = -u^hatr/u^hatt$. Or, to put it another way, the four-velocity has the $mathbfu = (gamma, -gamma v)$ structure we expect from special relativity.




          What if we want to go the other way and write down an expression for the four-velocity? We start with our expressions for the orthonormal basis vectors $mathbfe_hatmu$ and the four-velocity $mathbfu = u^hatt mathbfe_hatt + u^hatr mathbfe_hatr$. From the special relativistic formula $mathbfu = gamma(v) mathbfe_hatt - gamma(v) v mathbfe_hatr$ (which holds since we're in an orthonormal basis), we get that $u^hatt = gamma(v)$ and $u^hatr = -gamma(v) v$. Finally, going back to the $partial_mu$ basis, we find



          $$mathbfu = fracgamma(v)sqrt1-2M/r partial_t - gamma(v) v sqrt1-2M/r partial_r.$$



          This is the same as the given expression if we define $y = - mathbfu cdot partial_t = - g_tt u^t$, which works out to $y = gamma(v) sqrt1-2M/r$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          The velocity $v$ is not $dr/dt$. What the paper says is




          $vquad$ inward velocity of gas as measured by an observer at fixed $r$ in his local proper reference frame




          This means that you need to build an orthonormal frame from the $partial/partial^mu$ vectors at a given spacetime point. Well, you can check that the vectors



          $$mathbfe_hatt = frac1sqrt1-2M/r partial_t quad textand quad mathbfe_hatr = sqrt1 - 2M/r partial_r$$



          are orthonormal, satisfying $mathbfe_hatt cdot mathbfe_hatt = -1$ and $mathbfe_hatr cdot mathbfe_hatr = 1$. In terms of these, the four-velocity is



          $$mathbfu = fracysqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_hatt - fracvysqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_hatr = u^hatmu mathbfe_hatmu,$$



          and we have that $v = -u^hatr/u^hatt$. Or, to put it another way, the four-velocity has the $mathbfu = (gamma, -gamma v)$ structure we expect from special relativity.




          What if we want to go the other way and write down an expression for the four-velocity? We start with our expressions for the orthonormal basis vectors $mathbfe_hatmu$ and the four-velocity $mathbfu = u^hatt mathbfe_hatt + u^hatr mathbfe_hatr$. From the special relativistic formula $mathbfu = gamma(v) mathbfe_hatt - gamma(v) v mathbfe_hatr$ (which holds since we're in an orthonormal basis), we get that $u^hatt = gamma(v)$ and $u^hatr = -gamma(v) v$. Finally, going back to the $partial_mu$ basis, we find



          $$mathbfu = fracgamma(v)sqrt1-2M/r partial_t - gamma(v) v sqrt1-2M/r partial_r.$$



          This is the same as the given expression if we define $y = - mathbfu cdot partial_t = - g_tt u^t$, which works out to $y = gamma(v) sqrt1-2M/r$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 6 hours ago

























          answered 7 hours ago









          JavierJavier

          15.5k8 gold badges46 silver badges84 bronze badges




          15.5k8 gold badges46 silver badges84 bronze badges














          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I did have a misconception about which velocity v is. I see how this leads to the expression in the paper, but could you explain how to get the u components in this basis?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @SimonG. I just replaced the $partial_mu$ vectors in terms of the $mathbfe_hatmu$, using that $partial_t = sqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_t$ and so on.
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            But how would I get the expression for the four-velocity in the first place? Where do $y$ and $v$ come from if I'm starting from this orthonormal basis?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            @SimonG. I've updated my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, I did not know that this connection between orthonormal bases and special relativity could be made. It makes sense!
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago
















          • $begingroup$
            Thanks, I did have a misconception about which velocity v is. I see how this leads to the expression in the paper, but could you explain how to get the u components in this basis?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @SimonG. I just replaced the $partial_mu$ vectors in terms of the $mathbfe_hatmu$, using that $partial_t = sqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_t$ and so on.
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            But how would I get the expression for the four-velocity in the first place? Where do $y$ and $v$ come from if I'm starting from this orthonormal basis?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago











          • $begingroup$
            @SimonG. I've updated my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Thank you, I did not know that this connection between orthonormal bases and special relativity could be made. It makes sense!
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago















          $begingroup$
          Thanks, I did have a misconception about which velocity v is. I see how this leads to the expression in the paper, but could you explain how to get the u components in this basis?
          $endgroup$
          – Simon G.
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Thanks, I did have a misconception about which velocity v is. I see how this leads to the expression in the paper, but could you explain how to get the u components in this basis?
          $endgroup$
          – Simon G.
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @SimonG. I just replaced the $partial_mu$ vectors in terms of the $mathbfe_hatmu$, using that $partial_t = sqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_t$ and so on.
          $endgroup$
          – Javier
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @SimonG. I just replaced the $partial_mu$ vectors in terms of the $mathbfe_hatmu$, using that $partial_t = sqrt1-2M/r mathbfe_t$ and so on.
          $endgroup$
          – Javier
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          But how would I get the expression for the four-velocity in the first place? Where do $y$ and $v$ come from if I'm starting from this orthonormal basis?
          $endgroup$
          – Simon G.
          6 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          But how would I get the expression for the four-velocity in the first place? Where do $y$ and $v$ come from if I'm starting from this orthonormal basis?
          $endgroup$
          – Simon G.
          6 hours ago













          $begingroup$
          @SimonG. I've updated my answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Javier
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @SimonG. I've updated my answer.
          $endgroup$
          – Javier
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Thank you, I did not know that this connection between orthonormal bases and special relativity could be made. It makes sense!
          $endgroup$
          – Simon G.
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Thank you, I did not know that this connection between orthonormal bases and special relativity could be made. It makes sense!
          $endgroup$
          – Simon G.
          6 hours ago













          3












          $begingroup$

          Javier's answer is correct, but here's another way of seeing it: An observer's "local radial coordinate" $tilder$ and "local time coordinate" $tildet$ are defined such that the metric is (locally) $ds^2 = - dtildet^2 + dtilder^2$ (suppressing angular coordinates). It is evident that under this definition, $dtildet = dt sqrt1 - 2M/r $ and $d tilder = dr / sqrt1 - 2M/r$. Thus,
          $$
          -v = fracdtilderdtildet = frac11 - 2M/r fracdrdt.
          $$

          This implies that
          $$
          u^mu = fracdtdtau left( 1, fracdrdt , 0, 0 right) = fracdtdtau left( 1, -left(1 - frac2Mrright) v, 0, 0 right).
          $$

          Further requiring that $u^mu u_mu = -1$ then leads to
          $$
          fracdtdtau = sqrtfrac1(1 - 2M/r)(1 - v^2),
          $$

          which is equivalent to the expressions provided.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Although this is correct, one has to be careful, because the equations with the differentials don't necessarily define actual coordinate functions $tildet$ and $tilder$. The quotation marks around "local coordinates" are very important!
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer is more intuitive to me. The fact that local coordinates are equivalent to flat spacetime is only true exactly at point $p$ where the observer is, correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Michael. Just a small correction, $dt/dtau = (1-2M/r)^-1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$.
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            5 hours ago















          3












          $begingroup$

          Javier's answer is correct, but here's another way of seeing it: An observer's "local radial coordinate" $tilder$ and "local time coordinate" $tildet$ are defined such that the metric is (locally) $ds^2 = - dtildet^2 + dtilder^2$ (suppressing angular coordinates). It is evident that under this definition, $dtildet = dt sqrt1 - 2M/r $ and $d tilder = dr / sqrt1 - 2M/r$. Thus,
          $$
          -v = fracdtilderdtildet = frac11 - 2M/r fracdrdt.
          $$

          This implies that
          $$
          u^mu = fracdtdtau left( 1, fracdrdt , 0, 0 right) = fracdtdtau left( 1, -left(1 - frac2Mrright) v, 0, 0 right).
          $$

          Further requiring that $u^mu u_mu = -1$ then leads to
          $$
          fracdtdtau = sqrtfrac1(1 - 2M/r)(1 - v^2),
          $$

          which is equivalent to the expressions provided.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Although this is correct, one has to be careful, because the equations with the differentials don't necessarily define actual coordinate functions $tildet$ and $tilder$. The quotation marks around "local coordinates" are very important!
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer is more intuitive to me. The fact that local coordinates are equivalent to flat spacetime is only true exactly at point $p$ where the observer is, correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Michael. Just a small correction, $dt/dtau = (1-2M/r)^-1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$.
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            5 hours ago













          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          Javier's answer is correct, but here's another way of seeing it: An observer's "local radial coordinate" $tilder$ and "local time coordinate" $tildet$ are defined such that the metric is (locally) $ds^2 = - dtildet^2 + dtilder^2$ (suppressing angular coordinates). It is evident that under this definition, $dtildet = dt sqrt1 - 2M/r $ and $d tilder = dr / sqrt1 - 2M/r$. Thus,
          $$
          -v = fracdtilderdtildet = frac11 - 2M/r fracdrdt.
          $$

          This implies that
          $$
          u^mu = fracdtdtau left( 1, fracdrdt , 0, 0 right) = fracdtdtau left( 1, -left(1 - frac2Mrright) v, 0, 0 right).
          $$

          Further requiring that $u^mu u_mu = -1$ then leads to
          $$
          fracdtdtau = sqrtfrac1(1 - 2M/r)(1 - v^2),
          $$

          which is equivalent to the expressions provided.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          Javier's answer is correct, but here's another way of seeing it: An observer's "local radial coordinate" $tilder$ and "local time coordinate" $tildet$ are defined such that the metric is (locally) $ds^2 = - dtildet^2 + dtilder^2$ (suppressing angular coordinates). It is evident that under this definition, $dtildet = dt sqrt1 - 2M/r $ and $d tilder = dr / sqrt1 - 2M/r$. Thus,
          $$
          -v = fracdtilderdtildet = frac11 - 2M/r fracdrdt.
          $$

          This implies that
          $$
          u^mu = fracdtdtau left( 1, fracdrdt , 0, 0 right) = fracdtdtau left( 1, -left(1 - frac2Mrright) v, 0, 0 right).
          $$

          Further requiring that $u^mu u_mu = -1$ then leads to
          $$
          fracdtdtau = sqrtfrac1(1 - 2M/r)(1 - v^2),
          $$

          which is equivalent to the expressions provided.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 2 hours ago

























          answered 7 hours ago









          Michael SeifertMichael Seifert

          17.7k2 gold badges33 silver badges60 bronze badges




          17.7k2 gold badges33 silver badges60 bronze badges










          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Although this is correct, one has to be careful, because the equations with the differentials don't necessarily define actual coordinate functions $tildet$ and $tilder$. The quotation marks around "local coordinates" are very important!
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer is more intuitive to me. The fact that local coordinates are equivalent to flat spacetime is only true exactly at point $p$ where the observer is, correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Michael. Just a small correction, $dt/dtau = (1-2M/r)^-1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$.
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            5 hours ago












          • 1




            $begingroup$
            Although this is correct, one has to be careful, because the equations with the differentials don't necessarily define actual coordinate functions $tildet$ and $tilder$. The quotation marks around "local coordinates" are very important!
            $endgroup$
            – Javier
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer is more intuitive to me. The fact that local coordinates are equivalent to flat spacetime is only true exactly at point $p$ where the observer is, correct?
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            6 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @Michael. Just a small correction, $dt/dtau = (1-2M/r)^-1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$.
            $endgroup$
            – Simon G.
            5 hours ago







          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          Although this is correct, one has to be careful, because the equations with the differentials don't necessarily define actual coordinate functions $tildet$ and $tilder$. The quotation marks around "local coordinates" are very important!
          $endgroup$
          – Javier
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Although this is correct, one has to be careful, because the equations with the differentials don't necessarily define actual coordinate functions $tildet$ and $tilder$. The quotation marks around "local coordinates" are very important!
          $endgroup$
          – Javier
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          This answer is more intuitive to me. The fact that local coordinates are equivalent to flat spacetime is only true exactly at point $p$ where the observer is, correct?
          $endgroup$
          – Simon G.
          6 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          This answer is more intuitive to me. The fact that local coordinates are equivalent to flat spacetime is only true exactly at point $p$ where the observer is, correct?
          $endgroup$
          – Simon G.
          6 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          @Michael. Just a small correction, $dt/dtau = (1-2M/r)^-1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$.
          $endgroup$
          – Simon G.
          5 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          @Michael. Just a small correction, $dt/dtau = (1-2M/r)^-1/2(1-v^2)^-1/2$.
          $endgroup$
          – Simon G.
          5 hours ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f495383%2ffour-velocity-of-radially-infalling-gas-in-schwarzschild-metric%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

          Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

          Smell Mother Skizze Discussion Tachometer Jar Alligator Star 끌다 자세 의문 과학적t Barbaric The round system critiques the connection. Definition: A wind instrument of music in use among the Spaniards Nasty Level 이상 분노 금년 월급 근교 Cloth Owner Permissible Shock Purring Parched Raise 오전 장면 햄 서투르다 The smash instructs the squeamish instrument. Large Nosy Nalpure Chalk Travel Crayon Bite your tongue The Hulk 신호 대사 사과하다 The work boosts the knowledgeable size. Steeplump Level Wooden Shake Teaching Jump 이제 복도 접다 공중전화 부지런하다 Rub Average Ruthless Busyglide Glost oven Didelphia Control A fly on the wall Jaws 지하철 거