Isometric Heyacrazy - Now In 3D!Heyacrazy: CrossesHeyawake: An Introductory PuzzleHeyacrazy: CrossesHeyacrazy: ForksHeyacrazy: “LMI”Heyacrazy: CareeningHeyacrazy: No DiagonalsHeyacrazy: Empty SpaceHeyacrazy: DissectionToroidal Heyacrazy: RainstormHeyacrazier: Big Three

Can a network vulnerability be exploited locally?

Necessity of tenure for lifetime academic research

'Horseshoes' for Deer?

Get contents before a colon

Spicing up a moment of peace

Codewars - Highest Scoring Word

Why does Sauron not permit his followers to use his name?

What's the difference between a variable and a memory location?

Historical Daf Yomi calendar

Why does the weaker C–H bond have a higher wavenumber than the C=O bond?

Are sweatpants frowned upon on flights?

What caused the end of cybernetic implants?

Where should I draw the line on follow up questions from previous employer

Why did Starhopper's exhaust plume become brighter just before landing?

I feel cheated by my new employer, does this sound right?

Should I use the words "pyromancy" and "necromancy" even if they don't mean what people think they do?

Under GDPR, can I give permission once to allow everyone to store and process my data?

Has the number of the tribes of Israel anything to do with the universe/stars/planets?

Create a list of snaking numbers under 50,000

Can this planet in a binary star system exist?

Did ancient peoples ever hide their treasure behind puzzles?

What is this "opened" cube called?

Did the Apollo Guidance Computer really use 60% of the world's ICs in 1963?

Moscow SVO airport, how to avoid scam taxis without pre-booking?



Isometric Heyacrazy - Now In 3D!


Heyacrazy: CrossesHeyawake: An Introductory PuzzleHeyacrazy: CrossesHeyacrazy: ForksHeyacrazy: “LMI”Heyacrazy: CareeningHeyacrazy: No DiagonalsHeyacrazy: Empty SpaceHeyacrazy: DissectionToroidal Heyacrazy: RainstormHeyacrazier: Big Three






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








9












$begingroup$


This is a Heyacrazy puzzle on an isometric grid.



Rules of Heyacrazy:




  • Shade some cells of the grid.


  • Shaded cells cannot be orthogonally adjacent; unshaded cells must be orthogonally connected.


  • When the puzzle is solved, you must not be able to draw a line segment that passes through two borders, and does not pass through any shaded cells or grid vertices.


For an example puzzle and its solution, see this question.




Special rules for the isometric grid:




  • This grid is a three-dimensional structure, not a hexagon. Lines should be interpreted as paths on that structure. So in the below image, the blue path is a straight line (going diagonally across a 1x2 rectangle), and the red path is not (because it bends about a third of the way down).
    enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Pretty clear, but just to be 100%: "lines [are] paths on that structure" means that the lines run along the 3D surface, not through the 3D structure itself, yeah? So the blue line is "straight" on the unfolded mesh, not straight in 3D space and we don't need to consider lines leaving the surface.
    $endgroup$
    – Alconja
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Alconja Yes, that's correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    6 hours ago

















9












$begingroup$


This is a Heyacrazy puzzle on an isometric grid.



Rules of Heyacrazy:




  • Shade some cells of the grid.


  • Shaded cells cannot be orthogonally adjacent; unshaded cells must be orthogonally connected.


  • When the puzzle is solved, you must not be able to draw a line segment that passes through two borders, and does not pass through any shaded cells or grid vertices.


For an example puzzle and its solution, see this question.




Special rules for the isometric grid:




  • This grid is a three-dimensional structure, not a hexagon. Lines should be interpreted as paths on that structure. So in the below image, the blue path is a straight line (going diagonally across a 1x2 rectangle), and the red path is not (because it bends about a third of the way down).
    enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Pretty clear, but just to be 100%: "lines [are] paths on that structure" means that the lines run along the 3D surface, not through the 3D structure itself, yeah? So the blue line is "straight" on the unfolded mesh, not straight in 3D space and we don't need to consider lines leaving the surface.
    $endgroup$
    – Alconja
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Alconja Yes, that's correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    6 hours ago













9












9








9





$begingroup$


This is a Heyacrazy puzzle on an isometric grid.



Rules of Heyacrazy:




  • Shade some cells of the grid.


  • Shaded cells cannot be orthogonally adjacent; unshaded cells must be orthogonally connected.


  • When the puzzle is solved, you must not be able to draw a line segment that passes through two borders, and does not pass through any shaded cells or grid vertices.


For an example puzzle and its solution, see this question.




Special rules for the isometric grid:




  • This grid is a three-dimensional structure, not a hexagon. Lines should be interpreted as paths on that structure. So in the below image, the blue path is a straight line (going diagonally across a 1x2 rectangle), and the red path is not (because it bends about a third of the way down).
    enter image description here



enter image description here










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




This is a Heyacrazy puzzle on an isometric grid.



Rules of Heyacrazy:




  • Shade some cells of the grid.


  • Shaded cells cannot be orthogonally adjacent; unshaded cells must be orthogonally connected.


  • When the puzzle is solved, you must not be able to draw a line segment that passes through two borders, and does not pass through any shaded cells or grid vertices.


For an example puzzle and its solution, see this question.




Special rules for the isometric grid:




  • This grid is a three-dimensional structure, not a hexagon. Lines should be interpreted as paths on that structure. So in the below image, the blue path is a straight line (going diagonally across a 1x2 rectangle), and the red path is not (because it bends about a third of the way down).
    enter image description here



enter image description here







logical-deduction grid-deduction three-dimensional






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 8 hours ago









DeusoviDeusovi

74k7 gold badges255 silver badges325 bronze badges




74k7 gold badges255 silver badges325 bronze badges














  • $begingroup$
    Pretty clear, but just to be 100%: "lines [are] paths on that structure" means that the lines run along the 3D surface, not through the 3D structure itself, yeah? So the blue line is "straight" on the unfolded mesh, not straight in 3D space and we don't need to consider lines leaving the surface.
    $endgroup$
    – Alconja
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Alconja Yes, that's correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    6 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Pretty clear, but just to be 100%: "lines [are] paths on that structure" means that the lines run along the 3D surface, not through the 3D structure itself, yeah? So the blue line is "straight" on the unfolded mesh, not straight in 3D space and we don't need to consider lines leaving the surface.
    $endgroup$
    – Alconja
    6 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Alconja Yes, that's correct.
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    6 hours ago















$begingroup$
Pretty clear, but just to be 100%: "lines [are] paths on that structure" means that the lines run along the 3D surface, not through the 3D structure itself, yeah? So the blue line is "straight" on the unfolded mesh, not straight in 3D space and we don't need to consider lines leaving the surface.
$endgroup$
– Alconja
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
Pretty clear, but just to be 100%: "lines [are] paths on that structure" means that the lines run along the 3D surface, not through the 3D structure itself, yeah? So the blue line is "straight" on the unfolded mesh, not straight in 3D space and we don't need to consider lines leaving the surface.
$endgroup$
– Alconja
6 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Alconja Yes, that's correct.
$endgroup$
– Deusovi
6 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Alconja Yes, that's correct.
$endgroup$
– Deusovi
6 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















7













$begingroup$

I've been really enjoying these puzzles. This was the best one yet.




Done!




Reasoning:




Step 1
The first thing we notice is that we have a ton of opposite-color pairs. This observation gives us one unshaded cell immediately, the lowest colored cell in this picture:
Step 2
Now, let's suppose that middle cell is shaded. We can fill in a little neighborhood, but before long, we find ourselves unable to both both of the blue lines. So our supposition was wrong.
Step 3
Another little neighborhood. There's another cell that must be shaded. Also, examining both possible configurations of the bottom part gives us a few more unshaded cells.
Step 4
Another unshaded cell comes from the observation that one of those two must be shaded.
Step 5
We have two options for filling in those two center cells to block that horizontal line through them. Let's give one of them a try. In the upper left, there must be two diagonally-adjacent shaded cells, but either option cuts some unshaded ones off from the rest. So of those center cells, it's the left one that must be shaded.
Step 6
Once more, two diagonally-adjacent shaded cells. No contradiction this time; we merely realize that a couple nearby cells must be unshaded.
Step 7
Consider a line through those blue cells. Clearly, one must be shaded. If it's the leftmost one, then its lower-right neighbor must be as well—any of these three will block off the top. The unshaded cells must therefore connect around the bottom. Also, no two of those three cells can be shaded.
Step 8
Here, I hit a wall. Couldn't figure out the next step for a good ten minutes. But eventually, I saw it:
Step 9
Sneaky, sneaky isometric stuff! Now, the rest of the puzzle falls into place.
Step 10
Only one way to block both of these without cutting anything off:
Done!
Nice.







share|improve this answer








New contributor



Khuldraeseth na'Barya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    That's correct - nicely done! (And I'm glad you've been enjoying them!)
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    4 hours ago














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87558%2fisometric-heyacrazy-now-in-3d%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7













$begingroup$

I've been really enjoying these puzzles. This was the best one yet.




Done!




Reasoning:




Step 1
The first thing we notice is that we have a ton of opposite-color pairs. This observation gives us one unshaded cell immediately, the lowest colored cell in this picture:
Step 2
Now, let's suppose that middle cell is shaded. We can fill in a little neighborhood, but before long, we find ourselves unable to both both of the blue lines. So our supposition was wrong.
Step 3
Another little neighborhood. There's another cell that must be shaded. Also, examining both possible configurations of the bottom part gives us a few more unshaded cells.
Step 4
Another unshaded cell comes from the observation that one of those two must be shaded.
Step 5
We have two options for filling in those two center cells to block that horizontal line through them. Let's give one of them a try. In the upper left, there must be two diagonally-adjacent shaded cells, but either option cuts some unshaded ones off from the rest. So of those center cells, it's the left one that must be shaded.
Step 6
Once more, two diagonally-adjacent shaded cells. No contradiction this time; we merely realize that a couple nearby cells must be unshaded.
Step 7
Consider a line through those blue cells. Clearly, one must be shaded. If it's the leftmost one, then its lower-right neighbor must be as well—any of these three will block off the top. The unshaded cells must therefore connect around the bottom. Also, no two of those three cells can be shaded.
Step 8
Here, I hit a wall. Couldn't figure out the next step for a good ten minutes. But eventually, I saw it:
Step 9
Sneaky, sneaky isometric stuff! Now, the rest of the puzzle falls into place.
Step 10
Only one way to block both of these without cutting anything off:
Done!
Nice.







share|improve this answer








New contributor



Khuldraeseth na'Barya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    That's correct - nicely done! (And I'm glad you've been enjoying them!)
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    4 hours ago
















7













$begingroup$

I've been really enjoying these puzzles. This was the best one yet.




Done!




Reasoning:




Step 1
The first thing we notice is that we have a ton of opposite-color pairs. This observation gives us one unshaded cell immediately, the lowest colored cell in this picture:
Step 2
Now, let's suppose that middle cell is shaded. We can fill in a little neighborhood, but before long, we find ourselves unable to both both of the blue lines. So our supposition was wrong.
Step 3
Another little neighborhood. There's another cell that must be shaded. Also, examining both possible configurations of the bottom part gives us a few more unshaded cells.
Step 4
Another unshaded cell comes from the observation that one of those two must be shaded.
Step 5
We have two options for filling in those two center cells to block that horizontal line through them. Let's give one of them a try. In the upper left, there must be two diagonally-adjacent shaded cells, but either option cuts some unshaded ones off from the rest. So of those center cells, it's the left one that must be shaded.
Step 6
Once more, two diagonally-adjacent shaded cells. No contradiction this time; we merely realize that a couple nearby cells must be unshaded.
Step 7
Consider a line through those blue cells. Clearly, one must be shaded. If it's the leftmost one, then its lower-right neighbor must be as well—any of these three will block off the top. The unshaded cells must therefore connect around the bottom. Also, no two of those three cells can be shaded.
Step 8
Here, I hit a wall. Couldn't figure out the next step for a good ten minutes. But eventually, I saw it:
Step 9
Sneaky, sneaky isometric stuff! Now, the rest of the puzzle falls into place.
Step 10
Only one way to block both of these without cutting anything off:
Done!
Nice.







share|improve this answer








New contributor



Khuldraeseth na'Barya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$










  • 3




    $begingroup$
    That's correct - nicely done! (And I'm glad you've been enjoying them!)
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    4 hours ago














7














7










7







$begingroup$

I've been really enjoying these puzzles. This was the best one yet.




Done!




Reasoning:




Step 1
The first thing we notice is that we have a ton of opposite-color pairs. This observation gives us one unshaded cell immediately, the lowest colored cell in this picture:
Step 2
Now, let's suppose that middle cell is shaded. We can fill in a little neighborhood, but before long, we find ourselves unable to both both of the blue lines. So our supposition was wrong.
Step 3
Another little neighborhood. There's another cell that must be shaded. Also, examining both possible configurations of the bottom part gives us a few more unshaded cells.
Step 4
Another unshaded cell comes from the observation that one of those two must be shaded.
Step 5
We have two options for filling in those two center cells to block that horizontal line through them. Let's give one of them a try. In the upper left, there must be two diagonally-adjacent shaded cells, but either option cuts some unshaded ones off from the rest. So of those center cells, it's the left one that must be shaded.
Step 6
Once more, two diagonally-adjacent shaded cells. No contradiction this time; we merely realize that a couple nearby cells must be unshaded.
Step 7
Consider a line through those blue cells. Clearly, one must be shaded. If it's the leftmost one, then its lower-right neighbor must be as well—any of these three will block off the top. The unshaded cells must therefore connect around the bottom. Also, no two of those three cells can be shaded.
Step 8
Here, I hit a wall. Couldn't figure out the next step for a good ten minutes. But eventually, I saw it:
Step 9
Sneaky, sneaky isometric stuff! Now, the rest of the puzzle falls into place.
Step 10
Only one way to block both of these without cutting anything off:
Done!
Nice.







share|improve this answer








New contributor



Khuldraeseth na'Barya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





$endgroup$



I've been really enjoying these puzzles. This was the best one yet.




Done!




Reasoning:




Step 1
The first thing we notice is that we have a ton of opposite-color pairs. This observation gives us one unshaded cell immediately, the lowest colored cell in this picture:
Step 2
Now, let's suppose that middle cell is shaded. We can fill in a little neighborhood, but before long, we find ourselves unable to both both of the blue lines. So our supposition was wrong.
Step 3
Another little neighborhood. There's another cell that must be shaded. Also, examining both possible configurations of the bottom part gives us a few more unshaded cells.
Step 4
Another unshaded cell comes from the observation that one of those two must be shaded.
Step 5
We have two options for filling in those two center cells to block that horizontal line through them. Let's give one of them a try. In the upper left, there must be two diagonally-adjacent shaded cells, but either option cuts some unshaded ones off from the rest. So of those center cells, it's the left one that must be shaded.
Step 6
Once more, two diagonally-adjacent shaded cells. No contradiction this time; we merely realize that a couple nearby cells must be unshaded.
Step 7
Consider a line through those blue cells. Clearly, one must be shaded. If it's the leftmost one, then its lower-right neighbor must be as well—any of these three will block off the top. The unshaded cells must therefore connect around the bottom. Also, no two of those three cells can be shaded.
Step 8
Here, I hit a wall. Couldn't figure out the next step for a good ten minutes. But eventually, I saw it:
Step 9
Sneaky, sneaky isometric stuff! Now, the rest of the puzzle falls into place.
Step 10
Only one way to block both of these without cutting anything off:
Done!
Nice.








share|improve this answer








New contributor



Khuldraeseth na'Barya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor



Khuldraeseth na'Barya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








answered 5 hours ago









Khuldraeseth na'BaryaKhuldraeseth na'Barya

1715 bronze badges




1715 bronze badges




New contributor



Khuldraeseth na'Barya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




New contributor




Khuldraeseth na'Barya is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    That's correct - nicely done! (And I'm glad you've been enjoying them!)
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    4 hours ago













  • 3




    $begingroup$
    That's correct - nicely done! (And I'm glad you've been enjoying them!)
    $endgroup$
    – Deusovi
    4 hours ago








3




3




$begingroup$
That's correct - nicely done! (And I'm glad you've been enjoying them!)
$endgroup$
– Deusovi
4 hours ago





$begingroup$
That's correct - nicely done! (And I'm glad you've been enjoying them!)
$endgroup$
– Deusovi
4 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f87558%2fisometric-heyacrazy-now-in-3d%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

Кастелфранко ди Сопра Становништво Референце Спољашње везе Мени за навигацију43°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.5588543°37′18″ СГШ; 11°33′32″ ИГД / 43.62156° СГШ; 11.55885° ИГД / 43.62156; 11.558853179688„The GeoNames geographical database”„Istituto Nazionale di Statistica”проширитиууWorldCat156923403n850174324558639-1cb14643287r(подаци)