Semantic difference between regular and irregular 'backen'Looking for ALL german verbs database“Fehlen” weak, “empfehlen” strong. But “finden” and “empfinden” both strong. Cases when [some_verb] conjugates differently from [prefix+some_verb]?Most common Präteritum / Imperfekt forms in written German?Non-natives using strong verbs as they were weak: would this compromise understanding?How come there are two ways to conjugate the same verb? (e.g. erschrecken)Why do irregular verb lists not show present tense changes?Is “erinnern” irregular?Irregular Verbs in first and third person pluralIs “wissen” the only verb in German to have an irregular present tense?
Papers on arXiv solving the same problem at the same time
Joining lists with same elements
How can I unambiguously ask for a new user's "Display Name"?
Is gzip atomic?
"Opusculum hoc, quamdiu vixero, doctioribus emendandum offero."?
Command "root" and "subcommands"
How were medieval castles built in swamps or marshes without draining them?
How do we tell which part of kinetic energy gives rise to temperature?
Semantic difference between regular and irregular 'backen'
Prove your innocence
Why doesn't 'd /= d' throw a division by zero exception?
European language movie, people enter a church but find they can't leave
Rent contract say that pets are not allowed. Possible repercussions if bringing the pet anyway?
Why do proofs of Bernoulli's equation assume that forces on opposite ends point in different directions?
What is the loud noise of a helicopter when the rotors are not yet moving?
How to gently end involvement with an online community?
What should come first—characters or plot?
How do proponents of Sola Scriptura address the ministry of those Apostles who authored no parts of Scripture?
Can an ISO file damage—or infect—the machine it's being burned on?
Does ostensible/specious make sense in this sentence?
When one problem is added to the previous one
Removal of て in Japanese novels
Can $! cause race conditions when used in scripts running in parallel?
Was the Boeing 2707 design flawed?
Semantic difference between regular and irregular 'backen'
Looking for ALL german verbs database“Fehlen” weak, “empfehlen” strong. But “finden” and “empfinden” both strong. Cases when [some_verb] conjugates differently from [prefix+some_verb]?Most common Präteritum / Imperfekt forms in written German?Non-natives using strong verbs as they were weak: would this compromise understanding?How come there are two ways to conjugate the same verb? (e.g. erschrecken)Why do irregular verb lists not show present tense changes?Is “erinnern” irregular?Irregular Verbs in first and third person pluralIs “wissen” the only verb in German to have an irregular present tense?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
Is there a difference in meaning between the preterite buk, from backen, and backte?
If so what is it?
Thanks
irregular-verb
New contributor
tom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Is there a difference in meaning between the preterite buk, from backen, and backte?
If so what is it?
Thanks
irregular-verb
New contributor
tom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I feel that answers should at least mention duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_herstellen_garen vs duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_festhaengen_ankleben. Source: I have had German classes at school.
– Carsten S
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Is there a difference in meaning between the preterite buk, from backen, and backte?
If so what is it?
Thanks
irregular-verb
New contributor
tom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Is there a difference in meaning between the preterite buk, from backen, and backte?
If so what is it?
Thanks
irregular-verb
irregular-verb
New contributor
tom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
tom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 8 hours ago
David Vogt
9,1401 gold badge10 silver badges43 bronze badges
9,1401 gold badge10 silver badges43 bronze badges
New contributor
tom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 hours ago
tomtom
161 bronze badge
161 bronze badge
New contributor
tom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
tom is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I feel that answers should at least mention duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_herstellen_garen vs duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_festhaengen_ankleben. Source: I have had German classes at school.
– Carsten S
2 hours ago
add a comment |
I feel that answers should at least mention duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_herstellen_garen vs duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_festhaengen_ankleben. Source: I have had German classes at school.
– Carsten S
2 hours ago
I feel that answers should at least mention duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_herstellen_garen vs duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_festhaengen_ankleben. Source: I have had German classes at school.
– Carsten S
2 hours ago
I feel that answers should at least mention duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_herstellen_garen vs duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_festhaengen_ankleben. Source: I have had German classes at school.
– Carsten S
2 hours ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The text Backte oder buk, haute oder hieb? - Schwache oder starke Flexion by Jacqueline Kubczak (published in Sprachreport, Jg. 32 (2016), H. 4, S. 24-31) goes into great detail about backte vs. buk. Quoting its gist:
Die Formen buk/buken sind im heutigen geschriebenen Deutsch noch lebendig. Man findet sie nicht nur in literarischen, sondern auch in eher umgangssprachlich geschriebenen Texten. In der alltäglichen gesprochenen Sprache muten die starken Formen von backen aber doch altmodisch oder gestelzt an.
So, apart from the fact that buk is considered archaic in some contexts there is no difference in meaning.
New contributor
xebeche is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
"buk" is just an archaic form of "backte", both are past tense of "backen"
Source: I am German
New contributor
openend is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
For those verbs which have both a strong and a weak Präteritum form, there is generally no difference in meaning. That's true for backen et al.
Be careful however, as there are a lot of verbs which have very similar cousins:
liegen, es lag, gelegen
legen, es legte, gelegt
lügen, es log, gelogen
lugen, es lugte, gelugt
laugen, es laugte, gelaugt (auslaugen and entlaugen are meaningful)
For such verbs, you may misidentify the weak form as a modern replacement of the strong form, when it's actually two different verbs. The legen←→liegen misinterpretation is especially common as those verbs mean a very similar thing.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "253"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
tom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54008%2fsemantic-difference-between-regular-and-irregular-backen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The text Backte oder buk, haute oder hieb? - Schwache oder starke Flexion by Jacqueline Kubczak (published in Sprachreport, Jg. 32 (2016), H. 4, S. 24-31) goes into great detail about backte vs. buk. Quoting its gist:
Die Formen buk/buken sind im heutigen geschriebenen Deutsch noch lebendig. Man findet sie nicht nur in literarischen, sondern auch in eher umgangssprachlich geschriebenen Texten. In der alltäglichen gesprochenen Sprache muten die starken Formen von backen aber doch altmodisch oder gestelzt an.
So, apart from the fact that buk is considered archaic in some contexts there is no difference in meaning.
New contributor
xebeche is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The text Backte oder buk, haute oder hieb? - Schwache oder starke Flexion by Jacqueline Kubczak (published in Sprachreport, Jg. 32 (2016), H. 4, S. 24-31) goes into great detail about backte vs. buk. Quoting its gist:
Die Formen buk/buken sind im heutigen geschriebenen Deutsch noch lebendig. Man findet sie nicht nur in literarischen, sondern auch in eher umgangssprachlich geschriebenen Texten. In der alltäglichen gesprochenen Sprache muten die starken Formen von backen aber doch altmodisch oder gestelzt an.
So, apart from the fact that buk is considered archaic in some contexts there is no difference in meaning.
New contributor
xebeche is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The text Backte oder buk, haute oder hieb? - Schwache oder starke Flexion by Jacqueline Kubczak (published in Sprachreport, Jg. 32 (2016), H. 4, S. 24-31) goes into great detail about backte vs. buk. Quoting its gist:
Die Formen buk/buken sind im heutigen geschriebenen Deutsch noch lebendig. Man findet sie nicht nur in literarischen, sondern auch in eher umgangssprachlich geschriebenen Texten. In der alltäglichen gesprochenen Sprache muten die starken Formen von backen aber doch altmodisch oder gestelzt an.
So, apart from the fact that buk is considered archaic in some contexts there is no difference in meaning.
New contributor
xebeche is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The text Backte oder buk, haute oder hieb? - Schwache oder starke Flexion by Jacqueline Kubczak (published in Sprachreport, Jg. 32 (2016), H. 4, S. 24-31) goes into great detail about backte vs. buk. Quoting its gist:
Die Formen buk/buken sind im heutigen geschriebenen Deutsch noch lebendig. Man findet sie nicht nur in literarischen, sondern auch in eher umgangssprachlich geschriebenen Texten. In der alltäglichen gesprochenen Sprache muten die starken Formen von backen aber doch altmodisch oder gestelzt an.
So, apart from the fact that buk is considered archaic in some contexts there is no difference in meaning.
New contributor
xebeche is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
xebeche is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 7 hours ago
xebechexebeche
1333 bronze badges
1333 bronze badges
New contributor
xebeche is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
xebeche is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
"buk" is just an archaic form of "backte", both are past tense of "backen"
Source: I am German
New contributor
openend is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
"buk" is just an archaic form of "backte", both are past tense of "backen"
Source: I am German
New contributor
openend is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
"buk" is just an archaic form of "backte", both are past tense of "backen"
Source: I am German
New contributor
openend is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
"buk" is just an archaic form of "backte", both are past tense of "backen"
Source: I am German
New contributor
openend is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
openend is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 8 hours ago
openendopenend
1493 bronze badges
1493 bronze badges
New contributor
openend is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
openend is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
For those verbs which have both a strong and a weak Präteritum form, there is generally no difference in meaning. That's true for backen et al.
Be careful however, as there are a lot of verbs which have very similar cousins:
liegen, es lag, gelegen
legen, es legte, gelegt
lügen, es log, gelogen
lugen, es lugte, gelugt
laugen, es laugte, gelaugt (auslaugen and entlaugen are meaningful)
For such verbs, you may misidentify the weak form as a modern replacement of the strong form, when it's actually two different verbs. The legen←→liegen misinterpretation is especially common as those verbs mean a very similar thing.
add a comment |
For those verbs which have both a strong and a weak Präteritum form, there is generally no difference in meaning. That's true for backen et al.
Be careful however, as there are a lot of verbs which have very similar cousins:
liegen, es lag, gelegen
legen, es legte, gelegt
lügen, es log, gelogen
lugen, es lugte, gelugt
laugen, es laugte, gelaugt (auslaugen and entlaugen are meaningful)
For such verbs, you may misidentify the weak form as a modern replacement of the strong form, when it's actually two different verbs. The legen←→liegen misinterpretation is especially common as those verbs mean a very similar thing.
add a comment |
For those verbs which have both a strong and a weak Präteritum form, there is generally no difference in meaning. That's true for backen et al.
Be careful however, as there are a lot of verbs which have very similar cousins:
liegen, es lag, gelegen
legen, es legte, gelegt
lügen, es log, gelogen
lugen, es lugte, gelugt
laugen, es laugte, gelaugt (auslaugen and entlaugen are meaningful)
For such verbs, you may misidentify the weak form as a modern replacement of the strong form, when it's actually two different verbs. The legen←→liegen misinterpretation is especially common as those verbs mean a very similar thing.
For those verbs which have both a strong and a weak Präteritum form, there is generally no difference in meaning. That's true for backen et al.
Be careful however, as there are a lot of verbs which have very similar cousins:
liegen, es lag, gelegen
legen, es legte, gelegt
lügen, es log, gelogen
lugen, es lugte, gelugt
laugen, es laugte, gelaugt (auslaugen and entlaugen are meaningful)
For such verbs, you may misidentify the weak form as a modern replacement of the strong form, when it's actually two different verbs. The legen←→liegen misinterpretation is especially common as those verbs mean a very similar thing.
answered 7 hours ago
JankaJanka
39.4k2 gold badges33 silver badges73 bronze badges
39.4k2 gold badges33 silver badges73 bronze badges
add a comment |
add a comment |
tom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
tom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
tom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
tom is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to German Language Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fgerman.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f54008%2fsemantic-difference-between-regular-and-irregular-backen%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I feel that answers should at least mention duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_herstellen_garen vs duden.de/rechtschreibung/backen_festhaengen_ankleben. Source: I have had German classes at school.
– Carsten S
2 hours ago