String routinesString BuildingIterating string characters and passing them to a BIOS APIString length calculation implementation in Assembly (NASM)Check whether string ends with stringConvert string array to string with separatorAssembly 8086 program to input a 16-bit signed number (in string form) and output its binary equivalentE820 display using X86 legacy boot sector or DOS 6.22 com fileMIPS assembly string to int functionPrinting binary string in assemblystring length in x64 assembly (fasm)

Are there any cons in using rounded corners for bar graphs?

Set theory with antielements?

Change the default Bookmarks Folder In Firefox

Physical Interpretation of an Overdamped Pendulum

Is there a word for returning to unpreparedness?

Why do aircraft leave cruising altitude long before landing just to circle?

Doesn't the speed of light limit imply the same electron can be annihilated twice?

Why won't the Republicans use a superdelegate system like the DNC in their nomination process?

Unconventional examples of mathematical modelling

How do I answer an interview question about how to handle a hard deadline I won't be able to meet?

Short comic about alien explorers visiting an abandoned world with giant statues that turn out to be alive but move very slowly

How to render "have ideas above his station" into German

Did Michelle Obama have a staff of 23; and Melania have a staff of 4?

How do I pass a "list of lists" as the argument to a function of the form F[x,y]?

What would it take to get a message to another star?

Knights and Knaves on a (Not So) Deserted Island

What does 〇〇〇〇 mean when combined with おじさん?

The space of cusp forms for GL_2 over F_q(T)

Has the speed of light ever been measured in vacuum?

Who owns content posted at Paizo.com forums?

global variant of csname…endcsname

Why do so many people play out of turn on the last lead?

Java methods to add and authenticate users in MySQL

Minimum population for language survival



String routines


String BuildingIterating string characters and passing them to a BIOS APIString length calculation implementation in Assembly (NASM)Check whether string ends with stringConvert string array to string with separatorAssembly 8086 program to input a 16-bit signed number (in string form) and output its binary equivalentE820 display using X86 legacy boot sector or DOS 6.22 com fileMIPS assembly string to int functionPrinting binary string in assemblystring length in x64 assembly (fasm)






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4












$begingroup$


These are a few string routines (just the mem* ones). I've tried to optimize them the best I can without having them be too big, but I'm unsure if I've done a good job.



I'd prefer size over speed unless it's just a few bytes, in which case that would be fine. I would also prefer not to sacrifice simplicity for speed.



memchr.S (related):



.globl memchr
memchr:
mov %rdx, %rcx
movzbl %sil, %eax
repne scasb
lea -1(%rdi), %rax
test %rcx, %rcx
cmove %rcx, %rax
ret


memcmp.S:



.globl memcmp
memcmp:
mov %rdx, %rcx
repe cmpsb
movzbl -1(%rdi), %eax
movzbl -1(%rsi), %edx
sub %edx, %eax
ret


memcpy.S:



.globl memcpy
memcpy:
mov %rdx, %rcx
mov %rdi, %rax
rep movsb
ret


memmove.S:



.globl memmove
memmove:
mov %rdx, %rcx
mov %rdi, %rax
cmp %rdi, %rsi
jge 0f
dec %rdx
add %rdx, %rdi
add %rdx, %rsi
std
0: rep movsb
cld
ret


memrchr.S:



.globl memrchr
memrchr:
mov %rdx, %rcx
add %rdx, %rdi
movzbl %sil, %eax
std
repne scasb
cld
lea 1(%rdi), %rax
test %rcx, %rcx
cmove %rcx, %rax
ret


memset.S:



.globl memset
memset:
mov %rdx, %rcx
mov %rdi, %rdx
movzbl %sil, %eax
rep stosb
mov %rdx, %rax
ret


As usual for Stack Exchange sites, this code is released under CC/by-sa 3.0, but any future changes can be accessed here.










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$


    These are a few string routines (just the mem* ones). I've tried to optimize them the best I can without having them be too big, but I'm unsure if I've done a good job.



    I'd prefer size over speed unless it's just a few bytes, in which case that would be fine. I would also prefer not to sacrifice simplicity for speed.



    memchr.S (related):



    .globl memchr
    memchr:
    mov %rdx, %rcx
    movzbl %sil, %eax
    repne scasb
    lea -1(%rdi), %rax
    test %rcx, %rcx
    cmove %rcx, %rax
    ret


    memcmp.S:



    .globl memcmp
    memcmp:
    mov %rdx, %rcx
    repe cmpsb
    movzbl -1(%rdi), %eax
    movzbl -1(%rsi), %edx
    sub %edx, %eax
    ret


    memcpy.S:



    .globl memcpy
    memcpy:
    mov %rdx, %rcx
    mov %rdi, %rax
    rep movsb
    ret


    memmove.S:



    .globl memmove
    memmove:
    mov %rdx, %rcx
    mov %rdi, %rax
    cmp %rdi, %rsi
    jge 0f
    dec %rdx
    add %rdx, %rdi
    add %rdx, %rsi
    std
    0: rep movsb
    cld
    ret


    memrchr.S:



    .globl memrchr
    memrchr:
    mov %rdx, %rcx
    add %rdx, %rdi
    movzbl %sil, %eax
    std
    repne scasb
    cld
    lea 1(%rdi), %rax
    test %rcx, %rcx
    cmove %rcx, %rax
    ret


    memset.S:



    .globl memset
    memset:
    mov %rdx, %rcx
    mov %rdi, %rdx
    movzbl %sil, %eax
    rep stosb
    mov %rdx, %rax
    ret


    As usual for Stack Exchange sites, this code is released under CC/by-sa 3.0, but any future changes can be accessed here.










    share|improve this question









    $endgroup$
















      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$


      These are a few string routines (just the mem* ones). I've tried to optimize them the best I can without having them be too big, but I'm unsure if I've done a good job.



      I'd prefer size over speed unless it's just a few bytes, in which case that would be fine. I would also prefer not to sacrifice simplicity for speed.



      memchr.S (related):



      .globl memchr
      memchr:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      movzbl %sil, %eax
      repne scasb
      lea -1(%rdi), %rax
      test %rcx, %rcx
      cmove %rcx, %rax
      ret


      memcmp.S:



      .globl memcmp
      memcmp:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      repe cmpsb
      movzbl -1(%rdi), %eax
      movzbl -1(%rsi), %edx
      sub %edx, %eax
      ret


      memcpy.S:



      .globl memcpy
      memcpy:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      mov %rdi, %rax
      rep movsb
      ret


      memmove.S:



      .globl memmove
      memmove:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      mov %rdi, %rax
      cmp %rdi, %rsi
      jge 0f
      dec %rdx
      add %rdx, %rdi
      add %rdx, %rsi
      std
      0: rep movsb
      cld
      ret


      memrchr.S:



      .globl memrchr
      memrchr:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      add %rdx, %rdi
      movzbl %sil, %eax
      std
      repne scasb
      cld
      lea 1(%rdi), %rax
      test %rcx, %rcx
      cmove %rcx, %rax
      ret


      memset.S:



      .globl memset
      memset:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      mov %rdi, %rdx
      movzbl %sil, %eax
      rep stosb
      mov %rdx, %rax
      ret


      As usual for Stack Exchange sites, this code is released under CC/by-sa 3.0, but any future changes can be accessed here.










      share|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      These are a few string routines (just the mem* ones). I've tried to optimize them the best I can without having them be too big, but I'm unsure if I've done a good job.



      I'd prefer size over speed unless it's just a few bytes, in which case that would be fine. I would also prefer not to sacrifice simplicity for speed.



      memchr.S (related):



      .globl memchr
      memchr:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      movzbl %sil, %eax
      repne scasb
      lea -1(%rdi), %rax
      test %rcx, %rcx
      cmove %rcx, %rax
      ret


      memcmp.S:



      .globl memcmp
      memcmp:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      repe cmpsb
      movzbl -1(%rdi), %eax
      movzbl -1(%rsi), %edx
      sub %edx, %eax
      ret


      memcpy.S:



      .globl memcpy
      memcpy:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      mov %rdi, %rax
      rep movsb
      ret


      memmove.S:



      .globl memmove
      memmove:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      mov %rdi, %rax
      cmp %rdi, %rsi
      jge 0f
      dec %rdx
      add %rdx, %rdi
      add %rdx, %rsi
      std
      0: rep movsb
      cld
      ret


      memrchr.S:



      .globl memrchr
      memrchr:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      add %rdx, %rdi
      movzbl %sil, %eax
      std
      repne scasb
      cld
      lea 1(%rdi), %rax
      test %rcx, %rcx
      cmove %rcx, %rax
      ret


      memset.S:



      .globl memset
      memset:
      mov %rdx, %rcx
      mov %rdi, %rdx
      movzbl %sil, %eax
      rep stosb
      mov %rdx, %rax
      ret


      As usual for Stack Exchange sites, this code is released under CC/by-sa 3.0, but any future changes can be accessed here.







      strings assembly x86






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 8 hours ago









      JL2210JL2210

      2059 bronze badges




      2059 bronze badges























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          The code looks straight-forward and really optimized for size and simplicity.



          There's a small detail that I would change, though: replace cmove with cmovz, to make the code more expressive. It's not that "being equal" would be of any interest here, it's the zeroness of %ecx that is interesting.



          I like the omitted second jmp in memmove. It's obvious after thinking a few seconds about it.



          According to this quote it's ok to rely on the direction flag being always cleared.



          I still suggest to write a few unit tests to be on the safe side.








          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














          • $begingroup$
            See my answer for a bug that I found on my own (found by writing unit tests).
            $endgroup$
            – JL2210
            5 hours ago


















          2












          $begingroup$

          There's a bug in your code if memchr finds %sil in the last byte of %rdi; if %rcx tests to be zero and yet the byte has been found, it will incorrectly return zero.



          To fix that, do something like this:



          .globl memchr
          memchr:
          mov %rdx, %rcx
          movzbl %sil, %eax
          repne scasb
          sete %cl
          lea -1(%rdi), %rax
          test %cl, %cl
          cmovz %rcx, %rax
          ret


          The same applies to memrchr.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$

















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "196"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f226285%2fstring-routines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            2












            $begingroup$

            The code looks straight-forward and really optimized for size and simplicity.



            There's a small detail that I would change, though: replace cmove with cmovz, to make the code more expressive. It's not that "being equal" would be of any interest here, it's the zeroness of %ecx that is interesting.



            I like the omitted second jmp in memmove. It's obvious after thinking a few seconds about it.



            According to this quote it's ok to rely on the direction flag being always cleared.



            I still suggest to write a few unit tests to be on the safe side.








            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              See my answer for a bug that I found on my own (found by writing unit tests).
              $endgroup$
              – JL2210
              5 hours ago















            2












            $begingroup$

            The code looks straight-forward and really optimized for size and simplicity.



            There's a small detail that I would change, though: replace cmove with cmovz, to make the code more expressive. It's not that "being equal" would be of any interest here, it's the zeroness of %ecx that is interesting.



            I like the omitted second jmp in memmove. It's obvious after thinking a few seconds about it.



            According to this quote it's ok to rely on the direction flag being always cleared.



            I still suggest to write a few unit tests to be on the safe side.








            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$














            • $begingroup$
              See my answer for a bug that I found on my own (found by writing unit tests).
              $endgroup$
              – JL2210
              5 hours ago













            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            The code looks straight-forward and really optimized for size and simplicity.



            There's a small detail that I would change, though: replace cmove with cmovz, to make the code more expressive. It's not that "being equal" would be of any interest here, it's the zeroness of %ecx that is interesting.



            I like the omitted second jmp in memmove. It's obvious after thinking a few seconds about it.



            According to this quote it's ok to rely on the direction flag being always cleared.



            I still suggest to write a few unit tests to be on the safe side.








            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The code looks straight-forward and really optimized for size and simplicity.



            There's a small detail that I would change, though: replace cmove with cmovz, to make the code more expressive. It's not that "being equal" would be of any interest here, it's the zeroness of %ecx that is interesting.



            I like the omitted second jmp in memmove. It's obvious after thinking a few seconds about it.



            According to this quote it's ok to rely on the direction flag being always cleared.



            I still suggest to write a few unit tests to be on the safe side.









            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago









            JL2210

            2059 bronze badges




            2059 bronze badges










            answered 7 hours ago









            Roland IlligRoland Illig

            14.7k2 gold badges23 silver badges56 bronze badges




            14.7k2 gold badges23 silver badges56 bronze badges














            • $begingroup$
              See my answer for a bug that I found on my own (found by writing unit tests).
              $endgroup$
              – JL2210
              5 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              See my answer for a bug that I found on my own (found by writing unit tests).
              $endgroup$
              – JL2210
              5 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            See my answer for a bug that I found on my own (found by writing unit tests).
            $endgroup$
            – JL2210
            5 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            See my answer for a bug that I found on my own (found by writing unit tests).
            $endgroup$
            – JL2210
            5 hours ago













            2












            $begingroup$

            There's a bug in your code if memchr finds %sil in the last byte of %rdi; if %rcx tests to be zero and yet the byte has been found, it will incorrectly return zero.



            To fix that, do something like this:



            .globl memchr
            memchr:
            mov %rdx, %rcx
            movzbl %sil, %eax
            repne scasb
            sete %cl
            lea -1(%rdi), %rax
            test %cl, %cl
            cmovz %rcx, %rax
            ret


            The same applies to memrchr.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



















              2












              $begingroup$

              There's a bug in your code if memchr finds %sil in the last byte of %rdi; if %rcx tests to be zero and yet the byte has been found, it will incorrectly return zero.



              To fix that, do something like this:



              .globl memchr
              memchr:
              mov %rdx, %rcx
              movzbl %sil, %eax
              repne scasb
              sete %cl
              lea -1(%rdi), %rax
              test %cl, %cl
              cmovz %rcx, %rax
              ret


              The same applies to memrchr.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$

















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                There's a bug in your code if memchr finds %sil in the last byte of %rdi; if %rcx tests to be zero and yet the byte has been found, it will incorrectly return zero.



                To fix that, do something like this:



                .globl memchr
                memchr:
                mov %rdx, %rcx
                movzbl %sil, %eax
                repne scasb
                sete %cl
                lea -1(%rdi), %rax
                test %cl, %cl
                cmovz %rcx, %rax
                ret


                The same applies to memrchr.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                There's a bug in your code if memchr finds %sil in the last byte of %rdi; if %rcx tests to be zero and yet the byte has been found, it will incorrectly return zero.



                To fix that, do something like this:



                .globl memchr
                memchr:
                mov %rdx, %rcx
                movzbl %sil, %eax
                repne scasb
                sete %cl
                lea -1(%rdi), %rax
                test %cl, %cl
                cmovz %rcx, %rax
                ret


                The same applies to memrchr.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 1 hour ago

























                answered 5 hours ago









                JL2210JL2210

                2059 bronze badges




                2059 bronze badges






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f226285%2fstring-routines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    19. јануар Садржај Догађаји Рођења Смрти Празници и дани сећања Види још Референце Мени за навигацијуу

                    Israel Cuprins Etimologie | Istorie | Geografie | Politică | Demografie | Educație | Economie | Cultură | Note explicative | Note bibliografice | Bibliografie | Legături externe | Meniu de navigaresite web oficialfacebooktweeterGoogle+Instagramcanal YouTubeInstagramtextmodificaremodificarewww.technion.ac.ilnew.huji.ac.ilwww.weizmann.ac.ilwww1.biu.ac.ilenglish.tau.ac.ilwww.haifa.ac.ilin.bgu.ac.ilwww.openu.ac.ilwww.ariel.ac.ilCIA FactbookHarta Israelului"Negotiating Jerusalem," Palestine–Israel JournalThe Schizoid Nature of Modern Hebrew: A Slavic Language in Search of a Semitic Past„Arabic in Israel: an official language and a cultural bridge”„Latest Population Statistics for Israel”„Israel Population”„Tables”„Report for Selected Countries and Subjects”Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone„Distribution of family income - Gini index”The World FactbookJerusalem Law„Israel”„Israel”„Zionist Leaders: David Ben-Gurion 1886–1973”„The status of Jerusalem”„Analysis: Kadima's big plans”„Israel's Hard-Learned Lessons”„The Legacy of Undefined Borders, Tel Aviv Notes No. 40, 5 iunie 2002”„Israel Journal: A Land Without Borders”„Population”„Israel closes decade with population of 7.5 million”Time Series-DataBank„Selected Statistics on Jerusalem Day 2007 (Hebrew)”Golan belongs to Syria, Druze protestGlobal Survey 2006: Middle East Progress Amid Global Gains in FreedomWHO: Life expectancy in Israel among highest in the worldInternational Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2011: Nominal GDP list of countries. Data for the year 2010.„Israel's accession to the OECD”Popular Opinion„On the Move”Hosea 12:5„Walking the Bible Timeline”„Palestine: History”„Return to Zion”An invention called 'the Jewish people' – Haaretz – Israel NewsoriginalJewish and Non-Jewish Population of Palestine-Israel (1517–2004)ImmigrationJewishvirtuallibrary.orgChapter One: The Heralders of Zionism„The birth of modern Israel: A scrap of paper that changed history”„League of Nations: The Mandate for Palestine, 24 iulie 1922”The Population of Palestine Prior to 1948originalBackground Paper No. 47 (ST/DPI/SER.A/47)History: Foreign DominationTwo Hundred and Seventh Plenary Meeting„Israel (Labor Zionism)”Population, by Religion and Population GroupThe Suez CrisisAdolf EichmannJustice Ministry Reply to Amnesty International Report„The Interregnum”Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs – The Palestinian National Covenant- July 1968Research on terrorism: trends, achievements & failuresThe Routledge Atlas of the Arab–Israeli conflict: The Complete History of the Struggle and the Efforts to Resolve It"George Habash, Palestinian Terrorism Tactician, Dies at 82."„1973: Arab states attack Israeli forces”Agranat Commission„Has Israel Annexed East Jerusalem?”original„After 4 Years, Intifada Still Smolders”From the End of the Cold War to 2001originalThe Oslo Accords, 1993Israel-PLO Recognition – Exchange of Letters between PM Rabin and Chairman Arafat – Sept 9- 1993Foundation for Middle East PeaceSources of Population Growth: Total Israeli Population and Settler Population, 1991–2003original„Israel marks Rabin assassination”The Wye River Memorandumoriginal„West Bank barrier route disputed, Israeli missile kills 2”"Permanent Ceasefire to Be Based on Creation Of Buffer Zone Free of Armed Personnel Other than UN, Lebanese Forces"„Hezbollah kills 8 soldiers, kidnaps two in offensive on northern border”„Olmert confirms peace talks with Syria”„Battleground Gaza: Israeli ground forces invade the strip”„IDF begins Gaza troop withdrawal, hours after ending 3-week offensive”„THE LAND: Geography and Climate”„Area of districts, sub-districts, natural regions and lakes”„Israel - Geography”„Makhteshim Country”Israel and the Palestinian Territories„Makhtesh Ramon”„The Living Dead Sea”„Temperatures reach record high in Pakistan”„Climate Extremes In Israel”Israel in figures„Deuteronom”„JNF: 240 million trees planted since 1901”„Vegetation of Israel and Neighboring Countries”Environmental Law in Israel„Executive branch”„Israel's election process explained”„The Electoral System in Israel”„Constitution for Israel”„All 120 incoming Knesset members”„Statul ISRAEL”„The Judiciary: The Court System”„Israel's high court unique in region”„Israel and the International Criminal Court: A Legal Battlefield”„Localities and population, by population group, district, sub-district and natural region”„Israel: Districts, Major Cities, Urban Localities & Metropolitan Areas”„Israel-Egypt Relations: Background & Overview of Peace Treaty”„Solana to Haaretz: New Rules of War Needed for Age of Terror”„Israel's Announcement Regarding Settlements”„United Nations Security Council Resolution 497”„Security Council resolution 478 (1980) on the status of Jerusalem”„Arabs will ask U.N. to seek razing of Israeli wall”„Olmert: Willing to trade land for peace”„Mapping Peace between Syria and Israel”„Egypt: Israel must accept the land-for-peace formula”„Israel: Age structure from 2005 to 2015”„Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 306 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 188 countries, 1990–2013: quantifying the epidemiological transition”10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61340-X„World Health Statistics 2014”„Life expectancy for Israeli men world's 4th highest”„Family Structure and Well-Being Across Israel's Diverse Population”„Fertility among Jewish and Muslim Women in Israel, by Level of Religiosity, 1979-2009”„Israel leaders in birth rate, but poverty major challenge”„Ethnic Groups”„Israel's population: Over 8.5 million”„Israel - Ethnic groups”„Jews, by country of origin and age”„Minority Communities in Israel: Background & Overview”„Israel”„Language in Israel”„Selected Data from the 2011 Social Survey on Mastery of the Hebrew Language and Usage of Languages”„Religions”„5 facts about Israeli Druze, a unique religious and ethnic group”„Israël”Israel Country Study Guide„Haredi city in Negev – blessing or curse?”„New town Harish harbors hopes of being more than another Pleasantville”„List of localities, in alphabetical order”„Muncitorii români, doriți în Israel”„Prietenia româno-israeliană la nevoie se cunoaște”„The Higher Education System in Israel”„Middle East”„Academic Ranking of World Universities 2016”„Israel”„Israel”„Jewish Nobel Prize Winners”„All Nobel Prizes in Literature”„All Nobel Peace Prizes”„All Prizes in Economic Sciences”„All Nobel Prizes in Chemistry”„List of Fields Medallists”„Sakharov Prize”„Țara care și-a sfidat "destinul" și se bate umăr la umăr cu Silicon Valley”„Apple's R&D center in Israel grew to about 800 employees”„Tim Cook: Apple's Herzliya R&D center second-largest in world”„Lecții de economie de la Israel”„Land use”Israel Investment and Business GuideA Country Study: IsraelCentral Bureau of StatisticsFlorin Diaconu, „Kadima: Flexibilitate și pragmatism, dar nici un compromis în chestiuni vitale", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 71-72Florin Diaconu, „Likud: Dreapta israeliană constant opusă retrocedării teritoriilor cureite prin luptă în 1967", în Revista Institutului Diplomatic Român, anul I, numărul I, semestrul I, 2006, pp. 73-74MassadaIsraelul a crescut in 50 de ani cât alte state intr-un mileniuIsrael Government PortalIsraelIsraelIsraelmmmmmXX451232cb118646298(data)4027808-634110000 0004 0372 0767n7900328503691455-bb46-37e3-91d2-cb064a35ffcc1003570400564274ge1294033523775214929302638955X146498911146498911

                    Smell Mother Skizze Discussion Tachometer Jar Alligator Star 끌다 자세 의문 과학적t Barbaric The round system critiques the connection. Definition: A wind instrument of music in use among the Spaniards Nasty Level 이상 분노 금년 월급 근교 Cloth Owner Permissible Shock Purring Parched Raise 오전 장면 햄 서투르다 The smash instructs the squeamish instrument. Large Nosy Nalpure Chalk Travel Crayon Bite your tongue The Hulk 신호 대사 사과하다 The work boosts the knowledgeable size. Steeplump Level Wooden Shake Teaching Jump 이제 복도 접다 공중전화 부지런하다 Rub Average Ruthless Busyglide Glost oven Didelphia Control A fly on the wall Jaws 지하철 거